Simplify the D
I was watching a bit of that Bears game last night and something stood out in an interview they ran with Urlacher. He talked about how they only run a few kinds of blitzes, but they are a good defense because everyone knows their assignments well and knows what to do. Watching them, that seemed to be true. Even when they gave up a few yards, there were about 5 guys there to make the tackle. Contrast with the massacre yesterday and some of the bad defensive performances this year.
It seems like we could use some of that simplification philosophy. The Cowboys have the talent on D to play a lot better than they do--not Bears good, but better than we've seen. When big plays or long drives happen against them, it seems that half the guys don't seem to know where they should be (ahem, Roy) or who they are covering. The blitzes almost never seem to work.
Maybe it's time to simplify and emulate what is by far the most impressive D I've seen since the Ravens a few years ago.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
0 recs |
3 comments
Comments
defense
by Terry on Dec 19, 2005 9:43 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Urlacher was impressive
We need better linebackers, Ware has not learned how to play the run yet, he better by next year. I'm not buying Scott Shanle, and the jury is out on Fujita. In a 3-4 defense, you have to have better production out of your LB's than we are getting.
by Dave Halprin on Dec 19, 2005 6:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
linebackers
by Terry on Dec 19, 2005 8:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs


















