Giants destroy the Cowboys 36-22
The Dallas Cowboys imploded tonight at Texas Stadium as the New York Giants blasted them 36-22. Without going into too much detail, here's a quick recap.
Drew Bledsoe - bad. Throws a killer pick right before halftime to kill all momentum and probably his career.
The offensive line - awful. They were tissue, pathetic. They are killing this team.
The defensive secondary - toast. Watkins gets beat early; they never shut down the Giants receivers the rest of the way.
Run defense - ineffective. Tiki Barber and Brandon Jacobs ran over them in an embarrassing display.
Tony Romo - too many interceptions. He made the mistakes that were expected, and ones that he will probably continue to make until he gets more experience.
I don't know if Parcells plans to make the change to Romo permanent - I'm guessing he is - but the Cowboys are clearly in disarray. At 3-3 and on the crest of a 3-game road trip, the season hangs in the balance. The offensive line is not getting the job done. Neither QB got the job done tonight; it's possible that neither will this entire season. The defense isn't as good as we thought. The options seem so limited at the moment.
All the controversy after the game will be about the QB switch. Did we panic too soon, are we beginning the Romo era, can Parcells go back to Bledsoe? But the problems with this team are deeper. The offensive line is a disaster against good defenses. The secondary continues to give up big plays. And now our run defense was exposed. The Cowboys look like a great team against the bad teams, and this fooled many observers - including me - into thinking they are a good team. At this point in the season, we aren't.
Next week brings a chance at redemption, but the confidence of the Cowboys is on the ropes. It's going to take a minor miracle to turn this team around.
0 recs |
82 comments
Comments
Parcells sums it up:
by Parl on Oct 23, 2006 11:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Our season is not over guys
It starts in Carolina.
by Lobo on Oct 23, 2006 11:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I admire your optimism
Some good teams will be fighting for those wild cards.
10 games to go.
by Philosopher on Oct 23, 2006 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
are you watching the games
by Deke on Oct 23, 2006 11:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
deke, you'll be the
by Lobo on Oct 23, 2006 11:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
its not about jumping on and off
Two years ago, we lost our home game after the break against the giants, the season was over.
Last year, we lost to the Skins on Monday night, that game cost us our season.
The good teams, like the cream, starts to rise to the top, our team is getting worse, our three wins have come against three teams with the combined record of 5-14, teams that are in last place in their division, that should say it all.
by Deke on Oct 23, 2006 11:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're talking about the past
and i firmly believe we can do it with Romo.
by Lobo on Oct 23, 2006 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
laid an egg of a game two years ago
laid an egg of a game tonight.
Poor O-line play, gave up too many big plays, get no presssure on the QB, sounds like a three years pattern to me
by Deke on Oct 23, 2006 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the o-line played better in the 2nd half
this was a tough loss, but this team is not dead yet...1-2 in the divison hurts, but we will beat Washington and we have Philly at home....
for christ sakes, the Giants still have a very tough schedule so we'll see what happens...we're only 1 game out
by Lobo on Oct 23, 2006 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Fear
On paper they are great, but the intagibles stink. The Patriots can play a street Rookie Free Agent and a WR and give up fewer deep passes than Dallas does.
Its not that they are bad, just that they find a way to lose when they should find a way to win.
by 325424 on Oct 23, 2006 11:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deke is the eternal pessimist
by APerfectStar on Oct 23, 2006 11:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes we will
by APerfectStar on Oct 23, 2006 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
by jbratch on Oct 24, 2006 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you even watch
How anyone can watch that game and think this team at 3-3 will be able to go 7-3 or better the rest of the way with our tough schdedule is beyond me. With our conference losses, it is probably going to take 10-6 to make the playoffs without getting bumped on the tiebreakers.
All with a freshfaced green quarterback who appears quite turnover prone against a very sad defensive secondary.
It isn't being pessimistic, it's called being REALISTIC!!!!
by Playmaker88 on Oct 23, 2006 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another pessimist
by APerfectStar on Oct 24, 2006 12:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess bill's another pessimist
"I'm ashamed to put a team out there that plays like that," he said
by Deke on Oct 24, 2006 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's refering to the game
by APerfectStar on Oct 24, 2006 12:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our record:
3 losses against NYG at home, Philadelphia, and Jacksonville. Combined records: 11-8
1-2 in the division, a loss at home.
Not much to be optimistic about there.
by Parl on Oct 23, 2006 11:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
THAT DOESN'T F'IN MEAN
YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT WHY WE LOST THESE GAMES
ALL 3 LOSSES COULD OF BEEN WINS VERY EASILY...
It's not like the Cowboys have bad players, we just haven't put it together yet.....STILL 10 GAMES TO GO!
by Lobo on Oct 23, 2006 11:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if the cowboys had bad players
they have good players who play badly.
or who find creative ways to lose.
its a team of charles barkley's we need horry's and jordan's.
by 325424 on Oct 23, 2006 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Romo's post game press conference
by Lobo on Oct 23, 2006 11:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Romo era begins, I believe
A loss is almost never good, but I think this one is an exception. I was still supporting Bledsoe, but by halftime, it was becoming very clear that good teams could shut us down by blitzing him.
Losing itself isn't good, but I think Romo coming in helps start us on our way to the future (I'm assuming he starts next weekend). We may have to adjust our expectations a bit, but I still think the playoffs are a possibility. Romo shows promise.
Look, we have five Super Bowl trophies. Some teams have never made it to the Big Dance. I'm just going to relax, watch history unfold, and root for my Boys.
by Rob Zuber on Oct 23, 2006 11:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Kind of like the Steve Walsh Era, or the Gary Hogeboom Era.
He might turn out okay, but tonight was not at all inspiring.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 23, 2006 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it
by jbratch on Oct 23, 2006 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So Far
It might end up like other recent eras:
Testeverde Era
Carter Era
Hutchinson Era
Leaf Era
or the worst, the Henson Era, which lasted one half of one game.
Then again, maybe it will be more like the Beurlein Era
by Playmaker88 on Oct 24, 2006 12:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and how can you count
by jbratch on Oct 24, 2006 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you watch
Romo came in the game the first series of the second half.
The score was 12-7. One touchdown and the Cowboys are winning the game with half of it left.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 24, 2006 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah I watched the whole game
I pass, and what happended it was picked because a a deflection. Do yuo think that would affect your confidence being as it is your first real playing time in the NFL?
Damn give him a fair shot at least!
Do you think that would have been the call at 0-0?
by jbratch on Oct 24, 2006 12:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
let me get this straight!!!!
by Deke on Oct 24, 2006 12:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It reminded me
They tipped Bledsoe's pass, got an INT, and scored a touchdown on us the first two minutes of the game.
I think it was a bad play call. Parcells should have used Romo as a bus driver if he was going to put him in a situation like this.
Romo got thrown in the fire, but he didn't respond well at all. He has to if he wants to play in this league.
At any moment the last 3 years Romo would have been expected to come into the game and perform if Testeverde or Bledsoe went down to injury. Luckily he never had to.
Now it's all on him the rest of this season.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 24, 2006 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just get what some of these guys are watching
by Deke on Oct 24, 2006 12:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't Forget The Pelleur Era
by kcbrett5 on Oct 24, 2006 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, the Bledsoe era has been a disaster
Bledsoe sucks, that is certain. Romo might keep sucking or might not. He has a learning curve, that is for sure. How fast he learns it is anyone's guess.
I think Bill will go with Drew next week anyway.
by Philosopher on Oct 23, 2006 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
by jbratch on Oct 23, 2006 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Never mind
I was talking about the "Romo Era".
It should last about 10 more weeks barring injury.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 24, 2006 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our O line is our real downfall
As a result, Romo gives us the best chance to succeed because Bledsoe will continue to stand there and take sacks or throw picks. Romo might throw some picks but at least he can make things happen.
The defense is not great, but good enough if we had an offense that could score. It really all comes down to the O line, if they were good, we could score points and control the ball and the defense would look better.
by Terry on Oct 23, 2006 11:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You are right
I was not at all impressed with Romo. Two of those three INT's resulted in Giants touchdowns.
There was also at least 3 or 4 more passes that should have been picked off, but the Giants dropped them.
He does add a bit of a spark, but there are many backups in the league can be said to do the same because it is new energy on the field and a different style the defense has to adjust to.
As of yet, I am far from sold on him. It is entirely possible that Jerry's going to have to draft a qb in the 1st round or rent another free agent next season.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 23, 2006 11:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
terrells PC
by jbratch on Oct 23, 2006 11:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
its tough to imagine a fulfilling season
the best part of the team is punting and the punter dropped a ball early in the first big game of the season and had some crap punt in the next big game.
is vanderjagt our most consistent player. should we all kill ourselves or find italian soccer teams to root for on sundays? ugh
by 325424 on Oct 23, 2006 11:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
well
This is the reason I have changed my mind to think Romo ives us the best shot!
If we can't block the blitz we might as well have a QB that can run from it!
And if we use the Shotgun more it would help, Romo under center is not a whole lot better than Bledsoe under center he can only run so damn fast!
by jbratch on Oct 23, 2006 11:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly right!
by APerfectStar on Oct 23, 2006 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was kind of stoked how he looked for Terrell.
by jbratch on Oct 23, 2006 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
That drop was the final nail in this game.
Dropping the ball when he's WIDE OPEN on 4th and 2 is as bad as a fumble or an intereption. Same result.
Pathetic. Then he dances in the endzone after getting a TD when we're getting our asses kicked.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 24, 2006 12:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he shoulda caught that ball...
by Tuna Helper on Oct 24, 2006 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We were still
I should have said the Giants scoring a touchdown as a result of T.O. turning the ball over on a 4th down drop was the final nail in the game, because after that the game was out of reach.
Unless you mean the pick Romo threw to start the second half. I think we still had a chance after that one though.
The last INT came in garbage time, we were already out of it.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 24, 2006 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
being down 14 with 3 minutes...
even in high school.....
if that's the case, the giants were in garbage time when they came back against the iggles...and the bears were in garbage time against the cards when they came back...
by Tuna Helper on Oct 24, 2006 12:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right
Of course, the Cowboys weren't in the game after the Giants scored off that 4th and 2 drop so that's why they were down two touchdowns in the final minutes.
I can think of 25 million reasons why T.O. should take the blame for this loss more than Romo with that crucial drop.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 24, 2006 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you would be wrong...
this loss rests on our tendency to turn the ball over and our inability to stop the Giants....you can give a little of that blame butter to our secondary, o-line, QBs too....and T.O. can get some of that too for his drop...Glenn can get it for his drop....the backs can get it for their sorry blitz pickups....
but i'm sure many people will try and blame this loss on T.O., which is just ridiculous....
but, hey, it's america and anyone can blame anybody for anything....
what about north korea's nuke test? violence in the middle east? higher unemployment rates?
all happened on T.O.'s watch....
by Tuna Helper on Oct 24, 2006 12:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude
Terry Glenn's drop wasn't on 4th down of the most key drive of the game.
The whole team deserves a lot of blame, no question, but that drop was HUGE and when after they scored off of it I knew the game was over.
He's getting paid a lot of money to make those kind of key catches. He let the whole team and his fans down tonight.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 24, 2006 12:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
read my post again...
basically said don't get tunnel vision when laying the blame around....
by Tuna Helper on Oct 24, 2006 1:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he meant the last Bledsoe INT
by 325424 on Oct 24, 2006 7:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Romo made the correct read
by APerfectStar on Oct 24, 2006 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the rest of the seaon will at least be interesting
On an optimistic note, remember the Cowboys were 4 and 4 midway through the 71 season. Then Roger Staubach became the full time starter. Craig Morton sat. Similar qb's going and coming, both situations. Bledsoe proved tonight he sees a blitz if hit early. I hope Romo, who will most probably not be another Roger, can at least be servicable.
I'm going to the Carolina game Sunday night. Will be either cheering or crying afterwards, don't think it will be close, whatever the outcome.
by dougchar on Oct 23, 2006 11:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Romo
Serviceable is about the best we can hope for, at least this season.
Carolina probably won't be close, objectively speaking. They are going to want to absolutely obliterate us after the way they lost to us last year. With Romo in there, I'm sure they are going to smell the blood in the water.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 23, 2006 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah...
Those INTs at the end of the half and the beginning of the half were killers. But we were gettting dominated by them anyway. We couldn't stop the run, the pass, put pressure on Manning or stop the big play. Just not a good night for the Cowboys.
We got time, though. The season isn't over by a long stretch. But we are in trouble. Make no illusions. 10 wins should get you in the playoffs, which means we need to go 7-3 the rest of the way. Could happen. But don't see it right now.
by Tuna Helper on Oct 23, 2006 11:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
How can people maintain the illusion
What is good about it.
We have a talented defense.
We have a deep defense.
We have an athletic defense.
We do not have a good defense.
We have a defense that has the potential to be good, but that is it.
The Broncos built a better defense using lineman we waived.
by 325424 on Oct 23, 2006 11:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
at least we will
by jbratch on Oct 24, 2006 12:10 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I am
by jbratch on Oct 24, 2006 12:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The game
The score was only 12-7 when Romo came in. Far from out of his hands.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 24, 2006 12:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and the Giants D was injury decimated
by mlibbey on Oct 24, 2006 1:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never said the game was out of hand
by jbratch on Oct 24, 2006 12:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You said
Romo couldn't make the play. Period. He's been warming up on the bench for over 3 years now. We'll see if he can handle it the rest of this season, but he clearly couldn't tonight.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 24, 2006 12:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think either
by jbratch on Oct 24, 2006 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok too many beers
by jbratch on Oct 24, 2006 12:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I also do not think he
by jbratch on Oct 24, 2006 12:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It doesn't make a bit of difference
I dont care if Romo is in there at this point, this team is over rated, the O-line is a complete disaster, the defense is average, we wont make the playoffs, get the youth in there and lets try to get them extended time and try to build a foundation for next year.
If Romo starts next week, he may not make it through the game, and I dont want to go back to Bledsoe now, run with Romo for the rest of the season, the Panthers lost yesterday and that will be a hornets nest next week especially after they watched tonights game
by Deke on Oct 24, 2006 12:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Especially
by Playmaker88 on Oct 24, 2006 12:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude
Get over the Bledsoe thing. He's done, and he ain't coming back.
Rejoice, be happy, you guys have been whining about putting Romo in, now you get to watch the results.
Unfortunately, so do all the rest of us.
by Playmaker88 on Oct 24, 2006 12:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
One thing I think everyone can agree on
by APerfectStar on Oct 24, 2006 12:32 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Our
by jbratch on Oct 24, 2006 12:34 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
its
by jbratch on Oct 24, 2006 12:35 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Just trying to lighten the mood
You never know what will happen from week to week. We dug ourselves a hole tonight. But it's not beyond the realm of possibility that we climb out of it.
If you need an example, just look at last years Steelers, they went from down and out to NFL champions.
by APerfectStar on Oct 24, 2006 12:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly...
i personally hope my feelings are wrong and we turn this thing around....
we played bad. period. damn near everybody. we got whupped. it happens.
but we've got some talent on this team. that's undeniable. this loss just goes to show you that this is a game of matchups against weaknesses. so no matter how good you are, if the other team can exploit your weakness, you're done.
our weakness is our safeties in coverage and pressure on the QB. Getting it and stopping it. NYG exploited them, which covered up their weaknesses in the secondary.
We're all negative after this loss. I know I am. But I believe. We can turn it around. Will we? Who knows. But I know we can. And I won't stand for anything less than that premise.
by Tuna Helper on Oct 24, 2006 12:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The TO drop was
by jbratch on Oct 24, 2006 12:58 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















