Terry is a Romo-sexual...

by Chad on Nov 21, 2006 1:41 PM CST Comment 60 comments

Talk about man crush!!

I got really tired of destroying you at the Colts blog and thought I would take the argument over here for all your Cowboy friends to see.

Sure, they say, 'don't mess with Texas', but I'm a gonna!

So bring it on Terry. Let's discuss your bizarre affinity for Tony Romo and also your man love for a old #2 wide receiver that your coach once glossed as 'she'.

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

0 recs | Comment 60 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

and proud of it!

Hey, you didn't destroy anyone over at Stapede Blue, just sounded like a fool, thats all. When Rex Grossman becomes half the qb Romo already is, give me a call, which will be...NEVER!

Face it Chad, you're just envious that the Cowboys have a much better qb than your overrated Bears signal caller and thats an absolute fact. Romo is just going to keep getting better and better each game while Grossman is going to wallow in mediocrity preventing your Bears from reaching the SB.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 21, 2006 2:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

Now who sounds foolish?

Rex Grossman, since coming back from injury last year is 11 - 3 as a starter. Until Romo plays, say, I dunno, ten games? as starter, he has proven NOTHING! He maybe the next Joe Montana from all we know but he may be the next Joe Dirt too.

Try to keep your enthusiasm in check. Let him actually prove something before you crown him the next Aikman.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 21, 2006 3:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

I guess you dont watch the games

Grossman has been up and down all year, did you watch the cardinal/Bears game. Did you watch the Bears/Jets games, the jets should of won that game also. What we do know about Grossman, he's accident prone and has been up and down so far in his career. Right now, I'd take Romo since he's played four pretty good games thus far.

What exactly has Grossman proved again????

by Deke on Nov 21, 2006 3:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

11 - 3 as a starter

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 21, 2006 3:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

hey, I never said he was the next Aikman

I only said he has the potential to be really great. So far, he has been really good. The sky is the limit for this kid, he's only begun to tap into what he's capable of doing, which is why I, along with so many other Cowboy fans, are very excited. It's been a long time since the Cowboys had a really good qb.

BTW, Grossman's record is more a reflection on the Bears great D than his ability, ie Arizona game, but once Romo gets some games under his belt, he'll surely match Grossamn's W/L record, and more than likely surpass it.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 21, 2006 3:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Hey Terry

Your first paragraph describes both Romo and Grossman. Potential, really good, sky is the limit, and a reason to be excited. It's been a long time since we've had a really good QB. Very similar optimism.
There is no doubt Romo is better than Drew and Rex is better than the last fifteen or so we've had. They are both likely to be around for a while, the future is bright for both.
You guys run a good blog over here, lots of info. See you in the playoffs.

Go BEARS

by draftday on Nov 21, 2006 6:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

JUDAS!!!

After 4 NFL starts you can honestly say that Romo is better than Grossman!!!!! I would so ban you from WCG if I could!!!!!!!!!!!

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 21, 2006 6:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Calm down, take your meds.

Romo is better than Drew. End.
Rex is better than we've had. End.
Similar situations. End.

Go BEARS

by draftday on Nov 21, 2006 6:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

hmmmmmmmm.....

Good answer. I'm watching you....

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 21, 2006 7:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Now THAT's funny,,,,

by Tuna Helper on Nov 21, 2006 7:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

as for TG

he can beat any corner with ease on the Bears, so when he's blowing by them in the playoffs, I'll just have to laugh, just like I did at the Colt fans when he smoked their corners and beat them. Christ, their one corner had to actually grab the back of his jersey he was beat so bad.

So don't give #83 the respect he deserves, he'll just keep beating you and smile.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 21, 2006 2:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

Do you watch the Bears play?

"he can beat any corner with ease on the Bears"

Like Plaxico Burress did? You know Plaxico, the guy who is a lot better than Terry Glenn's old ass.

Glenn is a nice little #2 receiver.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 21, 2006 3:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

you're delusional Chad

Burress couldn't carry Glenn's jock strap. TG is so much better than Burress its absolutely comical you even mention him in the same sentence as TG.

Yeah, I suppose your ancient relic, Muhummad, and one year wonder Berrian, are better than TG too?

You're really delusional. Plaxico, thats funny.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 21, 2006 3:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

No one agrees with you...

Plaxico already, in four less years, has as many 1000 yard seasons as Glenn. Every one besides blind Cowboy fans would take Plax over Glenn. Anyday.

WRs who are better than Terry Glenn in the NFC EAST!:

Owen
Burress
Moss
Toomer (5 1000 yard seasons in same years)
Reggie Brown
Donte Stallworth

That's just in YOUR division.

Get over your man crush on Glenn. Not to mention did you know that our "ancient relic" is the same age as Terry Glenn and has had a better career than Terry Glenn. The only thing Glenn has over Moose is overall speed.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 21, 2006 3:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

first of all, you're wrong as usual

Glenn is 32 and "moose" is 34, so get your facts straight. Second, like I said, if you judge a wr simply by stats, then you'll be wrong in most cases.

The reason Glenn never compiled great stats throughout his career is because he was either hurt or had other off the filed issues. From a pure talent and ability standpoint, Glenn has no peers in terms of hands, route running, separation, break away speed amd moves. He simply cannot be covered one on one. Those "average" wr you mention, except for Owens, can easily be covered one on one.

Your Moose has nothing on Glenn except size, trust me, I've seen both play, a lot.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 21, 2006 4:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Sorry but you are wrong...

According to cbs.sportsline.com Glenn is only one year younger but more importantly, played in the league since 1996. that was the same year as Moose entered the league. So really that is what I was getting at.

"The reason Glenn never compiled great stats throughout his career is because he was either hurt or had other off the filed issues. From a pure talent and ability standpoint, Glenn has no peers in terms of hands, route running, separation, break away speed amd moves."

Well damn lets put him in the Hall of Fame. You're thinking is so retarded. Like a school child. Being hurt or having off field issues links directly to how you judge a player's career. Take a baseball example for instance, of one of my favorite players Kerry Wood (Texas native, btw). He has some of the best stuff I have ever seen. His pure talent is matched by no one in the league. The problem is that he can't stay healthy. IF he were to be healthy for his whole career, he probably would have approached Nolan Ryan territory but he won't.

Hell, if you want to judge people based on pure talent, then let's put Ryan Leaf in the Hall of Fame too.

In sports the rule is not what you could have or should have done, it's what you did do that matters.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 21, 2006 4:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

you think Ryan Leaf had talent??

Chad if you believe that you truly are a misguided soul.

I never said Glenn was as productive in terms of numbers, I've always conceded that obviously, but my point has always been Glenn is as agood as any wr in the game in terms of talent and ability and he has definitely proven that time and time again. Numbers don't mean anything when he makes a great clutch catch to beat the Colts or any other team for that matter.

So I guess using your logic you're going to have to admit Emmitt was the greatest of all time, even better than Sweetness because he has the most yards. Throw out Sanders and Brown too, because its what you did, not what you should have done, right?

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 21, 2006 8:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Wrong...

Ryan Leaf had worlds of talent. He was big and had a hell of an arm. But he was a world class jerk off. He was unable to make his brain utilize the gifts that God had given him. Anyone who knows anything about football knows that. Another more pointed example would be Mike Vick. The guy is one of the best athletes on the planet yet he is not a good quarterback.

Next, I never said whomever has the best stats was the best player. I said you need great stats to be considered great. Emmitt Smith was an EXCELLENT running back. He was big strong and fast enough. No, he was not better than Sweetness but Emmitt is a first ballot unanimous hall of famer and has the stats to back it up. Once again, you miss the point.

"but my point has always been Glenn is as agood as any wr in the game in terms of talent and ability"

This sentence means NOTHING. I don't care how much 'ability' you have. I doesn't make you a good football player. You need to produce to be considered a top player and he never has produced the way many many many guys around him have.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 21, 2006 8:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

first of all

Emmitt was better than Sweetness, truly the greatest back of all time, but Payton is a close second.

Second, Glenn's numbers will be decent enough to warrant him great player status. He doesn't need HOF numbers to be considered great. I think Drew Pearson was a great wr, but he doesn't have HOF numbers.

You're wrong about being great, you don't need impressive stats. You need ability, talent and heart and Glenn has all three in spades.

And you're wrong about Leaf, he might have great size and a strong arm, but that means nothing. He didn't have ability or heart, so he didn't have anything.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 21, 2006 8:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Wrong

Put Emmitt on those Bears teams and he gains squat. Put Walter behind that line you had and he gets 2500 yards a year.
Emmitt padded his stats by staying way longer than he was any good. You know it, did you still want him on your team when he left? Nope.
Hang your hat on him if you want, I'll take Walter any day.

Go BEARS

by draftday on Nov 21, 2006 9:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

not true draftday

Emmitt's running ability was ever bit as good as Payton's. They were both great and you can make an argument either one was the greatest. I obviously feel Emmitt was the best, not only in terms of running, but receiving and blocking and producing. Nobody was better.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 21, 2006 10:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

You're lost!!!!

Terry Glenn has been doubled teamed most of his career, why do you think that is.I dont see too many teams play bump and run coverage with hm.

its clear how good he is when other teams head coaches are asked, who on the cowboys are you are most worried about when you play them, they all say Terry Glenn.

Its not always about producing, it does have a lot to do with schemes teams run on offense.
Many say troy Aikman doesn't have the numbers to be in the Hall of Fame, but if you watched the Cowboys in the 90's, you know why he deserves to be there.

by Deke on Nov 21, 2006 9:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Aikman Hall Of Fame

If Steve Young can get in than Troy is a for sure thing. How that happened I'll never know. Blue light special Super Bowl.

And it's all about producing, it's all numbers in the NFL. Winning is everything.

Go BEARS

by draftday on Nov 21, 2006 9:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

You didn't read my posts...

1. Double teamed? NO. Not an argument. All the best wide receivers get double teamed. You know the real top wide receivers of the game, like Chad Johnson, Randy Moss, TO, Roy Williams, Plaxico Burress, Steve Smith, Santana Moss, Marvin Harrison.

And now that TO is on the team, why isn't Glenn lighting the world on fire.

You think they never double teamed Jerry Rice? Or Michael Irvin? Sure.

2. I never talked about QBs. QBs bring intangables to the game that a running back or wide receiver does not. Aikman was the leader of that team and 3 time Super Bowl Champ and a super bowl MVP. That is hall of fame credentials.

No one, besides blind Cowboy fans, would call Terry Glenn great. He's a very decent player. A nice little possesion receiver. Good speed, but just can't be a playmaker.

Sorry but you're dead wrong.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 22, 2006 12:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

no Chad, you're dead wrong

Terry Glenn is absolutely a play maker, a big time play maker and if you would ever watch a Cowboy game you would see that. You don't think those plays he made in the 4th qrt against the Colts were great plays? They won the game for the Cowboys and he did something no other player could do all season against the Colts.

Your statements about Glenn are ludicrous, saying Terry isn't a play maker is like saying your boy Urlacher is just a decent LB.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 22, 2006 9:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

PLAYMAKER!?!?!?!?!?!?!!??!?!

You don't know what a play maker is. He caught a slant pattern to win the game. I say it. Thats not what playmakers do. Thats what Wayne Chrebet used to do. That is being a possession receiver. You have a play maker on your team and his name is Terrell Owens. You just refuse to admit it. The next thing you are about to do is split hairs and say catching that slant pattern was 'making a big play'. Sure. That was a big play because of the situation. But over all, catching a six yard slant for a first down is run of the mill AT BEST! Being a playamaker is catching six yard slant and going 65 yards for a touchdown. Let's examine some stats:

Year    Team    G    GS    Rec    Yds    Avg    Lg    TD    20+    40+    1st
TOTAL    Glenn    130    122    565    8310    14.7    86    42    120    31    399
16 game ave                    1022.76            5.16    14.76    3.81    49.10
TOTAL    Owens    152    137    769    11259    14.6    91    108    171    42    532
                    1185.15            11.36    18    4.42    56
TOTAL    Harrison    164    162    987    13144    13.3    80    115    171    37    675
                    1282.34            11.21    16.68    3.608    65.85
TOTAL    Ocho Cinqo    86    73    436    6488    14.9    82    41    80    29    325
                    1207.06            7.62    14.88    5.39    60.46
TOTAL    Randy Moss    135    129    667    10602    15.9    82    101    162    57    474
                    1256.53            11.97    19.2    6.75    56.17

Based on a 16 games per year (which Glenn is prone NOT to play) he is behind every one of these real playmakers.

Glenn is a good wide receiver. He is no superstar no playmaker and no hall of famer. He's not even the best wide receiver on your team. Give it up already.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 22, 2006 1:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

no, you give it up

I don't care how many stats you throw in my face, I know for a fact that Glenn can make as may big plays as any receiver you listed. If you don't think Glenn can't catch a slant and take to the house, then you never watched him play, which is obvious.

Dude, you can't change my opinion, so give up already. Your stats mean nothing to me, I judge a wr on what I see, not numbers.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 22, 2006 1:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

OK...

Then what you see is a guy who does NOT make big plays (i.e. catches for touch downs, catches for 20+ yards or 40+ yards.)

You see a guy who does NOT catch the ball as much as the better wide receiver on his team or others in the league.

You see a guy who does a decent job on a daily basis.

You do NOT see a superstar, well, unless you're watching TO.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 22, 2006 1:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

not true

most of the catches Glenn makes are big plays, last season he lead the league with a 18 yd per catch average, so more than not, the catches he makes are big time, although being the great playmaker he is, he makes all kinds of catches to help the Cowboys win games.

So when I watch TG, I see a guy who makes all kinds of really difficult catches, a hell of a lot more than just a decent job.

You're opinion of T.O. and Glenn are backwards as Glenn doesn't drop passes. He comes through in the clutch when a big play is needed. Whether it be a simple 10 yd slant to seal the game, or a 70 yard bomb, he can do it all. Terry Glenn is by far the best wr on the Cowboys, the most underrated wr in the league and T.O. is by far the most overrtaed wr in the game.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 22, 2006 2:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

You're drunk.

Santana Moss cannot be easily covered by one person. I shouldn't have to say that on a Cowboy's blog, as you know pretty well what happened in the 1st Redskins/Cowboys game last year -- two players chasing Santana Moss.

Hogs Haven

by Skin Patrol on Nov 21, 2006 4:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Newman blanketed him this year

your just lucky he wasn't covering him last season.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 21, 2006 8:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Go Terry!!!

You were right about Romo when almost everyone else doubted, and you had the guts to trash talk the Colts fans all week, before the Boys beat'em.

Grizz is still "The Man", but you are definitely
climbing fast.

When some guy from the last team we beat, follows you over to our blog, you know you've arrived.

Keep up the great work.

by APerfectStar on Nov 21, 2006 3:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

Chad, Yes it is true!!

Terry has a serious man crush on Romo and among other Cowboy players, one being roy Williams. Terry is also a major Homer when it comes to the cowboys, and sometimes that blinds him, but that fine, but the fact is, he was right when it came to Tony Romo wanting him to start from the start of the season, Tony Romo has completely changed this offense, our team seems to have a swagger now on offense, I'm not going to compare him to MANNING this early in his career, well maybe Eli, he certainly looks alot better than that first round draft pick. Romo has made some questionable throws, but he has been impressive moving this offense. No one expected an undrafted Qb to come in and do what he's done, we all hope he continues to develop and that the bubble doesn't burst and finally becomes the starting Qb this team has been looking for since Aikman retired.

Terry Glenn is our number one receiver by the way, not the number two, that would be buckethead. Glenn cant be covered one on one, hence the double teams he sees on a constant basis throughout his career. Bill has a really good relationship with Tery Glenn, he's one of his favorite players he's coached, thats why he called him SHE, a motivation tool.

by Deke on Nov 21, 2006 3:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

#1 really?

You mean with less receptions, less yards and less touchdowns than Terrell Owens? You mean the guy who has notched 3 1000 yard receiving years in his 11 years. You mean the guy who never has had double digit touchdown receptions in one year? As opposed to Owens who, if not for a devastating injury would be working on his 7th straight and 8 out of ninth year with 1000 + yards. You mean the same Owens that has had 5 seasons with 10+ tds and probably will have another this year?

You guys don't even know the best players on your own team.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 21, 2006 3:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

well

if you only measure a player's worth just by his stats, then you obviously don't know anything about football....which was always obvious anyway.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 21, 2006 3:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

To tell you the truth...

Wide receiver and running back are the only two positions on the field that can be judged by stats. Perhaps linebackers and total tackles.

But overall, with quarterbacks, stats don't tell the whole story but they give you a damned good idea. But pretty much, great players have great stats (running backs and wide receivers) and not so great players don't have great stats. You can't find one great running back or wide receiver who didn't have great stats.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 21, 2006 3:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Well before Romo, Glenn was #1

But since Romo, I think it might have switched. He does throw to Eldorado more than Bledsoe did (or at least completes more).

But the great thing about Romo is how he spreads the ball pretty evenly. Glenn, Eldorado, and Witten, who ever is open.

by APerfectStar on Nov 21, 2006 6:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

try Gale Sayers

how does he rank in stats with the all time greats? Not too good, but you can't tell me he wasn't great.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 21, 2006 8:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Perfect example...

I was going to use Sayers myself.

First, Gayle Sayers DOMINATED when he was healthy. In his healthy years, he led the league in rushing twice and finished in the top 5 in rushing every year of his healthy period.

Sayers is a hall of famer. Glenn NEVER will be a hall of famer.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 21, 2006 8:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

don't count your chickens too soon

2 things get you into the HOF, numbers and rings. If Glenn can get a few rings with the Cowboys, he might have an outside shot. It is tougher with wr because there are still so many great ones out there not in the HOF, so to me, just because you don't make the HOF as a wr, doesn't mean you weren't truly great.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 21, 2006 9:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

What a clown you are...

"If Glenn can get a few rings with the Cowboys, he might have an outside shot."

Michael Irvin isn't getting in the Hall. And I don't care how many rings Glenn gets he will NEVER make the hall.

Don't get me wrong. 88 was freakin' awesome. I loved that guy. Now that was a GREAT wide receiver. Not Terry Glenn.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 22, 2006 12:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

You're so full of it Chad

its seeping out your ears. Michael Irvin will make the HOF, maybe not this year, but he'll get in, he has to as one of the greatest wr of all time. If he wasn't a Cowboy he would already be in since the HOF certainly has a bias against Cowboy players. The fact that it took so long to induct one of the greatest OL to ever play, Rayfield Wright, the best ever of his era, and the fact Bob Hayes isn't in, which is a travesty, since he revolutionized the wr position. Irvin is a HOF player, no question about it.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 22, 2006 9:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

I think Irvin will get in the HoF

But I think he shouldn't be allowed in until they let Art Monk in. That's a travesty.

Hogs Haven

by Skin Patrol on Nov 22, 2006 11:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

no doubt they both were truly great players

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 22, 2006 12:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

The 'real' Playmaker...

Won't make the hall cause his career was cut short. What a great player, though.

Art Monk should be in the hall.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 22, 2006 1:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

There is no anti-cowboy bias...

Bob Hayes doesn't belong in the hall of fame by any stretch of the imagination. Lightning fast? Yes. Good football player? sure. Hall of Fame? You're nuts.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 22, 2006 1:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Bullet Bob definitely deserves to be in the HOF

as much as any player because he totally revolutionized the position and if you knew anything about fottball, which you don't, you would realize that. He caused defense cooridinators to invent zone coverages because of his speed and if a player can have that kind of impact on the game, he belongs as one of the best to ever play.

Of course you won't understand that because you're simple minded and have no clue. I'm beginning to think I'm conversing with a 10 year old.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 22, 2006 1:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

That all really means nothing.

We was fast. Defensive coordinators figured him out and then they stopped him. Go ahead and look how his stats declined year to year. He was a fad. A track guy. Puhleeeze. No one agrees with you and your lame takes and homerism. That is why he's not in the hall. It would appear to me that people who understand this game agree with me. While whackos like you do not.

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 22, 2006 1:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

there are a lot of people

who agree Bob Hayes should be in the HOF that aren't Cowboy fans for your information. The reason he isn't because of the Cowboy biasness.

Then again a simple minded idiot like you wouldn't know or understand that.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 22, 2006 2:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

there is no anti-cowboy bias...

The Cowboys are "America's Team" remember that whole thing?

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 22, 2006 2:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

The Playmaker WILL be in the HOF

You're way wrong on that one Chad.

by APerfectStar on Nov 22, 2006 2:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

You wanna bet on that one?

How bout this, if #88 makes the Hall, I will write a post here talking about how great #88 was (won't be hard as I really liked him) and talk about how underrated he was and how Jerry Rice got all the press but quietly #88 was better yada..yada..yada...

But he he doesn't, you come to WindyCityGridIron and post a column on how I know football. I know it so damn well, its hard to understand why I'm not a GM.

Deal?

Windy City Gridiron the place for REAL football talk

by Chad on Nov 22, 2006 2:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

are you talking about this year

or ever? Because I know there is a possibility he won't get in this year, but I know he will someday. So I'll take the bet unless it has to be this year.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Nov 22, 2006 3:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

I don't know if The Playmaker makes it this year..

but I'm 100% sure he will be in the HOF soon, regardless of his off-field problems.

by APerfectStar on Nov 22, 2006 9:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

the funny thing is...

you couldn't give away either one of these guys in fantasy football before the beginning of the season.....now both are like hotcakes and sausage.....everybody wants some!!!

you put romo on the bears and they're probably undefeated....

by Tuna Helper on Nov 21, 2006 4:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

yeah

you put Rex on the Cowboys and he would have won at least one more game.
He wouldn't just stand there watching the rush come with a look on his face that told the world he had no idea what to do. Don't throw it away, don't run away, just stand there. After that one play I knew Drew had no future in the NFL.

Go BEARS

by draftday on Nov 21, 2006 6:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

Yeah,

that stellar come-from-behind-game-winning performance against the Arizona Cardinals really instilled my faith in Rex Grossman. Oh, wait... ;)

If Romo had started the year we probably would have won the Jacksonville game, the Phillie game and quite possibly the Giants game. Sadly shoulda, woulda, couldas don't mean squat in this league. Hopefully we'll meet you guys in the playoffs and expose how great a qb Romo is and how average at best Grossman is.

by Tristan on Nov 22, 2006 3:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs