Cowboys vs. Eagles: Mini-review
I finally got to go back and watch the game again for a film review. But since it’s already Wednesday and the Breerman did an excellent takedown of the game here, I went through it relatively quickly. So below is not a true film review, just some surface observations of the game.
I couldn’t quite figure out what was wrong with Tony Romo. I counted eight passes before his injury that were off-target, some wildly off. He had receivers open but just couldn’t hit them. After he got hurt with 10 minutes to go in the 3rd quarter, he really looked about the same as before. He had a few pass that sailed wildly that probably were influenced by the thumb, but he also made some solid completions after that, too. He really whacked his hand on Leonard Davis’ helmet, in slow-motion you could really see that was the injury moment. One thing I did notice is that he got impatient in the redzone. He had T.O. open on a crossing pattern but he threw it too soon. He needed to wait another half-second for Owens to clear the linebacker and the referee. Another time he threw to Sam Hurd in the corner of the endzone but if had waited a bit longer Jason Witten was one-on-one with a linebacker and was just beating him to the inside.
I thought Bradie James bounced back to have a really good game. He got the sack on a flea-flicker play because he waited to diagnose the play and realized it was a pass and no one was coming through his zone. So he just shot the middle to get the sack. He also had another good middle pass rush combined with some good play against the run game.
It was good to see Anthony Spencer get two big hits on McNabb on third downs to ruin the plays. The kid is going to be a player once he gets more time on the field and little more experience. Like learning when to follow the RB into the flats, he gave up a big play to Westbrook out there.
Jay Ratliff was everywhere, he had a fantastic game. Tank Johnson also had a couple of good plays running down a screen pass and deflecting a pass at the goal line.
Kyle Kosier struggled a little bit in the game. He wiped out a 3rd down conversion with a holding call and got beat into the backfield on a couple of occasions.

The Breerman says that Chris Mortensen says that Bill Parcells will probably take the VP of Football Operations job in Atlanta.
The Breerman’s take:
It should be noted that the Tuna's got a sparkling rep for cleaning up some mighty messy situations. When he took over the Giants, they'd posted just one winning season in the previous decade. The Jets and Pats were long-time laughingstocks, who'd combined to go 3-33 in the year before Parcells. And the Cowboys were 5-11 three years in a row prior the Tuna's arrival, and still feeling the effects of hanging on to a decaying dynasty for too long.
Still, I'm not sure any of those circumstances were quite the disaster that this one in Atlanta is. But history's proven that betting against the big guy in the face of adversity's not real smart.
Update [2007-12-19 15:31:52 by Dave Halprin (Grizz)]: ESPN now says that Parcells won't join the Falcons and indicated that Miami revised an offer to him so he might be leaning towards a job in South Florida. [END UPDATE]

0 recs |
57 comments
Comments
EA Sports
I don't think they think highly of Romo. I was playing Madden 07 the other day and he kept overthrowing receivers like Philadelphia was in town.
I can't wait until 09, when the Cowboys have a sick team.
I hope we get our running game back on track against Carolina. NE showed they can run in bad weather, we need to do the same.
by Parl on Dec 19, 2007 1:40 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Nice to hear from you Parl
For all, Parl is one of the old-time old-school BTB'ers. He goes way back here, but we don't hear from him enough. :-(
by Dave Halprin on Dec 19, 2007 1:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As someone who plays too much madden...
I can say that Romo is plenty good to win super bowls in Madden 08. But he'll be in for a big ratings boost.
BTW, play with NE's defensive playbook and go blitz happy. It's a lot of fun and, like real football, plays to the boys' strengths.
As for reality, agreed re: the running game. I'm expecting heavy doses of both RBs this weekend. JJ always seems to have big games against the Panthers.
by grapejoos on Dec 19, 2007 2:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My son kills
with Romo as QB, even the Pats. I'm just hoping Romo never gets the cover!
by King Man on Dec 19, 2007 2:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
they ran 35 times for 133 yards (3.8 ypc), the NE line was unable to generate a good run game against a team that is 30th in the league against the run. When you look at Brady's stats, they had to turn to the run and that was the best they could do. So with that perspective they were more subpar, against a good run D they will have problems if they do not improve.
by cowboy78 on Dec 19, 2007 2:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sportwriters as a whole are morons
You know, it's one thing for fans to joke about the 'Jessica Simpson Factor'. We're die-hard fans of the team, we don't get paid for what we write, and no one takes us seriously anyway (we don't take ourselves seriously, either).
But when people (FOXSports, ESPN, and MSNBC)who claim to be intelligent write such things (and apparently not in a joking manner), people who are paid for what they write, people who don't even realize that it wasn't Simpson's first home game appearance (she was at both the Jets and Packers games, and Romo was on fire both times), it says a lot. It says a lot about the media that they seriously buy into that nonsense. Clowns.
by Nelson on Dec 19, 2007 2:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think a lot of Romo's problems Sunday
was the fact the team didn't have a very good week of practice. Bigg was interviewed on the NFL Network Tuesday night and said the practices before the Philly game were not very good.
This explains why Romo and T.O. could never get into sync. Hopefully this week's practices go much better.
by Terry on Dec 19, 2007 2:24 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
So
Are you saying Tony was at no fault at all?
by Longhorn on Dec 19, 2007 2:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I never said that or ever even implied that
Obviously if the practices don't go well, he's partly to blame.
He's going to get all the credit when they win and the blame when they lose. So far he's 12-2, pretty good if you ask me.
by Terry on Dec 19, 2007 2:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"he's 12-2"
so i guess he gets all the credit?
by Longhorn on Dec 19, 2007 2:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I assume you understand the english language
what part of "he's 12-2" don't you understand?
by Terry on Dec 19, 2007 2:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
so
he gets all the credit for wins, but it's not his fault for losses. Got ya.
by Longhorn on Dec 19, 2007 2:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess you don't understand english then
because what I said in my previous post was that a qb gets all the credit for the wins and all the blame for losses.
Now do I have to write this one word at a time for you to understand?
by Terry on Dec 19, 2007 3:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
so who do YOU think should get the credit for the wins and losses?
by Longhorn on Dec 19, 2007 3:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
obviously everyone on the team
and the coaching staff.
by Terry on Dec 19, 2007 4:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Also
first it was, he hurt his hand that's why he had a bad game, then it was, oh maybe he hurt it before the game, then it was, hmm, maybe he hurt it during practice and it just wasn't right all week, and now it was, oh, it was the team's fault for not practicing well all week. Get your story straight son...
by Longhorn on Dec 19, 2007 2:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
dude, I was only speculating because at that time
nobody really knew how or when the injury occured.
I'm not saying his bad day was 100% attributable to the injury but it sure as hell was a factor in the second half.
by Terry on Dec 19, 2007 3:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
so i guess
he just sucked in the 1st half? oh wait, nevermind, that was because of the poor practices...
by Longhorn on Dec 19, 2007 3:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why don't you guys take your squabble elsewhere?
Doesn't make for an interesting thread.
by Dave Halprin on Dec 19, 2007 3:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
anywhere else
by Dave Halprin on Dec 19, 2007 3:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Take some Christmas cheer to all of the
UT players in lock-up.
by Wharter on Dec 19, 2007 4:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Quitter does it again
Uses Arther Blank to get a better offer from Miami...
by Longhorn on Dec 19, 2007 2:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
An idea
Quitter takes over for Miami because of the draft picks. And, of course he would trade down (no way he takes a RB 1st overall) to Dallas for the 2 1st rounders and any combination of 'his' players like Carpenter/Fasano/Spears/Kosier/etc...
by Longhorn on Dec 19, 2007 2:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yes
i know he won't pick a RB number 1.
by Longhorn on Dec 19, 2007 2:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That would be sweet
we can give him our number 1 picks, Marbust Spears and Carp for the overall number one. Maybe arkcowboys was right after all...
by Billito on Dec 19, 2007 3:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
After what Marbust said in training camp
about how Bill was holding him back scheme wise, apparently not much as it turned out, because we haven't seen a great deal of improvement from Marbust,I doubt he'll want to go to Miami to play under Bill again.
by Deke on Dec 19, 2007 3:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah its too bad
I wish we could make him take marbust and JuJo as key components for his next team. As I said before, I don't want to start another marathon debate but watching Parcells do all this negotiating in the public eye just really rubs me the wrong way and makes me see how truly egomaniacal he is. Sucks to be a Falcons fan.
by Billito on Dec 19, 2007 4:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I feel bad for Blank
The Falcons organization has really had a tough year, and Blank always from his interviews seems like a class act, just as things seems to be turning around, the whole organization seems to have gone completely off the tracks.
I was hoping Bill would take the Falcons job as VP of player development, a media FOB talked to him this morning as reported in New York and said that he had a deal in place to take over in Atlanta, but I guess Miami countered with a better offer. And when I think about it, I think Miami is a better situation, Bill will want to switch to the 3-4 defense and Atlanta just signed Zimmer this year and he runs the 4-3, I dont think bill would want to fire him, he has respect for Zimmer, but Bill will want a 3-4 defensive coordinator to run the defense. I just hope someone can be brought in and take over the job in Atlanta and get things turned around for the organization and the fans of the Falcons, they have had one of thee worst years in the history of the NFL.
by Deke on Dec 19, 2007 7:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't because anyone who would sign Vick
to that multi million contract is a moron and deserves the mess he has now.
by Terry on Dec 19, 2007 7:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Terry, you have almost everyone on the board
agreeing with your postings. Now, if you could get Deke and Longhorn to come over to your side, you could overthrow Grizz and become Der Blogmeister !
by Wharter on Dec 19, 2007 8:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's lame Terry
So Blank deserves the mess he has because he signed his star player to a multi million dollar contract? Good thing that logic didn't apply to all the bad moves Jerry made in the past 10 years. And he also deserved to be screwed by his new coach who promised to stay to turn the franchise around? And offering BP a job - another move worthy of being screwed? Jesus I hope the guys doesn't give any money to the poor this holiday, by your logic they will come burn his house down.
by Billito on Dec 19, 2007 9:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
his so called star player is a joke
and was the most overrated player in the history of the league, not to mention an animal abuser.
Blank only signed Vick for marketing reasons, not because he was a great qb who could lead his team to a SB.
Never compare Blank to Jerry because Jerry will do whatever it takes to field a winner, unlike Blank.
by Terry on Dec 19, 2007 9:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, Deke
Blank is a decent guy and he doesn't deserve this. Running a successful pro sports franchise in Atlanta is hard to do because the fans don't care (seriously, I lived there, it's true, ask Grizz), and when Vick got there, the Falcons actually mattered. It's asinine to say Blank deserves this for giving Vick a big contract. He was beloved there at one point. I was in Atlanta for 4 years, and until Vick came, home game Sundays were great because you got the game of the week. They would never sell out. When Vick arrived, it completely energized the team and the city.
Blank has basically been stabbed in the back repeatedly this year. Maybe he should have seen it coming from Vick, Petrino, and Parcells, but at least in the case of the first two, he never did anything but do right by them and support them. If his flaw is being too trusting or protective, well, that's not too big a flaw.
I wish he would sell the Falcons and buy the Braves, because the man actually cares about winning. I hope the Falcons can turn it around. I really feel for their fans.
by grapejoos on Dec 19, 2007 8:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You're right grape
For a moment in time there after Vick won the playoff game in Green Bay and the Falcons looked to be on the rise they were the toast of Atlanta. Blank is a good owner and very much cares about winning. He thought he had his franchise QB and could build a winner. 20/20 hindsight leads to blustery proclamations of Vick's incompetence, but that guy had rare skills and football people knew it. I just don't think they could find the best way to utilize those skills.
by Dave Halprin on Dec 19, 2007 9:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I always thought Vick sucked as a qb
sure he has rare skills as a runner, but you're primary responsibility as a QB isn't running, its throwing, which Vick was always horrible.
Like I said, the most overrated player in the history of the league and never once displayed any type of competence within the pocket, only outside of it.
I disagree Blank cares about winning, he only cares about making money and he saw Vick as a cash cow from a marketing standpoint in Atlanta. He filled the seats and sold jerseys, thats all Blank cared about and now its coming back to haunt him.
The only way to ever utilize Vick's skills is definitely not within the pocket as a QB, thats for damn sure. The NFL absolutely demands passing skills from the QB position, something Vick never possessed and never will.
by Terry on Dec 20, 2007 7:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He has a rocket-strong arm, but...
... lacked the accuracy, which never seemed to improve. I always thought that Arthur Blank should've paid Steve Young a boatload of money to tutor/mentor Vick, because I thought their styles were similar.
The difference is that Young ran less with each year of NFL experience and his accuracy improved each season, as well.
Damn shame how Michael Vick flushed his career down the toilet.
And what's interesting is, he'll still be in his early 30s when he gets out of the joint, and if ends up in the right situation and the right organization... he could get another opportunity to right his career ship and future.
by kcbrett5 on Dec 20, 2007 8:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the problem with Vick is that
he really never was a NFL QB, but scouts fell in love with his raw athletic skills, just like scouts fell in love with Jeff George's arm and we all know how that pick turned out.
The fact is the QB position in the NFL is much more about reading defenses and processing a lot information during pre reads and during the play, than it is about having a rocket arm or great athletic ability. Those atrributes obviously help, but its not what makes a QB good.
If a QB doesn't have the mental capacity to play the position he'll never be any good. Not only was Vick very inaccurate, but he could never read defenses or process information fast enough. When his first read was covered, he would rather scramble and run. Good defenses could very easily defense Vick because of these reasons.
Vick's unique athletic skills were fun to watch and filled stands, but were not condusive to playing QB in the NFL. He actually should have played in Canada where he probably would have been a truly great player.
by Terry on Dec 20, 2007 8:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Vick was a transcendent player
I think there is some seriously revisionist history going on here. Does anyone remember Vick in college? He was incredible, a once-in-a-lifetime talent at QB that single-handedly led his team to the national championship. He was the fastest guy on the field and had a rocket arm.
Now, when he got the NFL, what happened? He single-handedly made the Falcons a contender, led them to the NFC championship game and was a terror on the field. Doesn't anyone remember those incredible plays he routinely made his first full year? I admit, most of that was using his feet. But he was incredibly effective and disruptive to defenses. Then, he got hurt, they tried to turn him into a pocket passer to protect him, and things slowly devolved.
It's painfully obvious that Vick wasn't "smart" enough to be a great NFL player. I agree, Terry, that he couldn't read or react to defenses well enough, nor did he improve his accuracy enough. That said, I think that he had the ability to do those things, but he wasn't driven enough to make himself better. The guy had been coddled his whole life, got away with pretty much everything, and seemed to be a pot-head while in the NFL. He wasted his transcendent talent because he didn't have to try as hard as others did.
You can blame Blank for failing to reverse that course in Vick's life or not recognizing it when giving him that contract, but I don't think that makes him deserve his franchise falling into ruins when it turns out the guy is a felon. When Vick was in college and his first couple of years in the NFL, I saw a franchise player, a hall-of-famer, and a big time marketing stud. I am sure I wasn't the only one here to feel that way, either, whether people remember it or not.
by grapejoos on Dec 20, 2007 1:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
! agree 100% grapejoos
and this coming from a cowboys fan who lives 10 miles from the VT campus(even though i'm UNC alum).I still remember the magic that mike vick performed in his college days and his 1st few years in the league.
by TrueBlue24 on Dec 20, 2007 1:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And that's why I felt that...
he should've stayed his final two seasons @ Va Tech. That would have given Vick more experience reading defenses and more experience adjusting to certain schemes.
Plus, Grape made an excellent point about being coddled. Imagine if he was under the tutelage of a proven coach, where he could've maybe sat for a year or two learning the nuances of the QB position in the NFL.
Instead, he never received the proper coaching, he never became a "gym rat," and he never developed. Meanwhile, nobody held him to strict accountability off the field.
VT's Head Coach Frank Beamer warned Vick -- during #7's rookie season -- about not letting old friends bring him down. But the problem, Beamer stated, was that Vick was "too giving" and too nice to say no.
What a waste.
by kcbrett5 on Dec 20, 2007 2:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Vick could have used the experience in staying in school, though I guess he was the #1 overall pick, and that's usually the right time to leave. Though he is certainly fully to blame for his own undoing, his story is a little tragic to me. If his athletic gifts hadn't led people to constantly let him off the hook (he was somewhat notorious at VA Tech for getting away with things from what I've heard), he probably would have been checked long before he got himself in the kind of trouble he is in now, and probably would have made himself a better player in the process. It's a very sad story that should be a cautionary tale for phenom athletes everywhere. If there is a positive with what has happened to him, I think it's that guys in his type of situation (and dogfighters, for that matter) have been given a clear warning of what can happen if they don't discipline themselves and change their ways.
by grapejoos on Dec 20, 2007 4:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tony Romo is indeed Vinnie Chase
Loved the HBO "Entourage" reference (my favorite sitcom by the way -- I have all three DVD volumes) in the foxsports.com Romo article you lined, Grizz.
But I disagree with the writer.
Tony Romo is Vinnie Chase, the lead character and stud actor who gets all the women...
by kcbrett5 on Dec 19, 2007 2:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Roy's appeal denied
according to The Ticket
by voiceofreason on Dec 19, 2007 3:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That's just stupid
Great, we lose a player. I don't get your logic, if there is any.
by APerfectStar on Dec 20, 2007 5:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tom, you have to understand that
longhorn, burt and deke are player haters and their hatred of these players blinds them to really see the true value the player actually has to the team.
Its unfortunate, but true.
by Terry on Dec 20, 2007 7:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No.
We are just realists. Unlike some people like Terry and, well Terry...
by Longhorn on Dec 20, 2007 8:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no
saying that Roy being out is good for the team is not reality.
by Terry on Dec 20, 2007 8:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That video makes me sad
because Roy was so awesome and I don't know what happened to him. I think the rumors are true that he doesn't like to work hard on conditioning and technique because if we had the Roy from that video on the team now - holy cow!
by Billito on Dec 20, 2007 8:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I thought the same thing...
Especially after posting about Vick above, then watching that video, it made me wonder what's up with Roy. I think he's lost his self-confidence or his drive or something. I don't know the guy and I don't pretend to, but he's just not the same animal as in those clips above. Maybe it's just age, but it seems like more than that. He was such an instinctual player, and I wonder if some of that got dulled (of course, getting burned repeatedly down field can do that to a guy -- not a bash!).
Oh and BTW, NICE PASS by that Redskins QB toward the end of the clip. Sheesh.
by grapejoos on Dec 20, 2007 11:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess Kevin Sherrington from DMN
also isn't a realist when he says we really need Roy .
Even if Williams' career clearly isn't headed in the right direction, the Cowboys desperately need him.
He's not so far removed from the safety that Darren Woodson once described as the best football player he'd ever seen.
by Terry on Dec 20, 2007 9:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















