Davis contract terms; Gramatica could sign by Monday
Davis visited the Cowboys on Friday before meeting with the Redskins on Saturday. With guys like Eric Steinbach and Derrick Dockery getting $17 and $18 million guaranteed, look for Davis to be in that neighborhood.
The DMN says the contract is for 7 years and $50 million, with $18 million guaranteed.
[snip]
Davis’ total money and guaranteed money falls in line with what Cleveland gave Eric Steinbach (seven years, $49.5 million, $17 million guaranteed) and Buffalo gave Derrick Dockery (seven years, $49 million, $18 million guaranteed) so far in free agency.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Pardon me while I heave
There was not much to choose from out there and Davis at least wants to be here. Now announce Colombo signing so Davis can at least play guard.
I guess Jerry's back to his old ways again.
Lee, Deke -- I'm next in line to blow chunks... pass me the bucket when you're both done.
Sounds like Flo
by Longhorn @ Blogging The Boys on Mar 4, 2007 4:30 PM CST up reply actions
we signed gurode for peanuts
by Burt D @ Blogging The Boys on Mar 4, 2007 2:54 PM CST reply actions
ESPN story
Updated: March 4, 2007, 11:23 AM ET
Cowboys to add Davis to offensive line
By Michael Smith
ESPN.com
The Dallas Cowboys are finalizing an agreement with free agent offensive lineman Leonard Davis, the second pick in the 2001 NFL draft who has played the last six seasons for the Arizona Cardinals, a source with knowledge of the negotiations told ESPN.com.
Davis, 6-feet-6, 366 pounds, is expected to play either right tackle or right guard for the Cowboys, depending on the resolution of contract talks with current Cowboys right tackle Marc Columbo, an unrestricted free agent the Cowboys hope to re-sign.
Davis' contract is expected to exceed the free agent deals of Bills guard Derrick Dockery (7 years, $49 million) and Browns guard Eric Steinbach (7 years, $49.5 million).
Davis visted the Washington Redskins and was considering a visit to the New York Giants, but decided on the Cowboys due to a desire to stay close to his hometown of Wortham, Texas, just south of Dallas.
Davis was an All-America tackle at the University of Texas, and played his first three seasons at guard for the Cardinals before switching to tackle the last three seasons.
Adam Schefter on NFL.com says:
This is $100,000 more than Eric Steinbach received. One-upmanship anyone?
Profootballtalk.com is reporting
They also make the comment that Davis now makes four O-line players (and none a LT) (Davis, Steinbach, Dielman and Dockery) signing for huge money and none have ever been to the Pro Bowl. We better hope Davis makes it for the next 5 years.
Our old friend Jacob Rogers
Ex-Cowboys in Denver
Ebenezer Ekuban
Michael Myers
Quincy Morgan
and now possibly Jacob Rogers... if he makes "da cut."
Shanahan will take risks on anybody
Ugh!
I know some have pointed out that the salary cap is going up, but that doesn't mean you can spend indiscriminately (as Grizz explains). I thought that the whole advantage to signing Davis was that he would be a BARGAIN compared to the other guard options. The ONLY way this makes sense is if Davis grades out as a better guard than the guys that were being mentioned as the best guards in free agency. This seems doubtful to me because switching positions (yes, he's had some experience at guard, but not a lot) almost certainly requires a strong work ethic, one of Davis' noteable weak points.
I was not completely against the idea of Davis mainly because I thought he would be a cheap alternative that filled in one of the Cowboys' last holes so that they could take the best player available in the draft (assuming you sign Colombo). But this contract is just TERRIBLE. A seven year deal to a 29 year old? I realize we're talking NFL contract here, but since when is it a good idea to sign guys to contracts where you hope they're productive for half of it!? Does anyone really expect Mr. Underacheiver to be a quality guard in 4 years at age 33? And then 7 million a year? Again, this 7 million/year isn't the same as Flozell's 6 million/year because of the difference in cap when the two contracts were signed (2007 vs 2003), but it's still gets back to this idea of how much you are willing to pay for average players.
Finally, I would like to point out that this is an effect of the Cowboys inability to consistently think ahead and develop their own O-linemen. I understand that much of Parcells time here was spent trying to quickly fill as many holes as possible and that in that time Pettiti, Gurode and Johnson were added to Flo as O-linemen we developed. You could add Colombo to the list as well I suppose, even though that's more scouting than developing. That still means that about half of the O-line has to be brought in through free agency. Also, it should be pointed out how differently the Cowboys build an O-line compared to how the elite teams like the Chargers, Colts, or Patriots build an O-line. Do you realize that San Diego had a rookie LT in addition to a rookie QB (with a couple years of bench time) on their way to the league's best record? And that they drafted him with the 50th overall pick? I understand that this is the ideal and that picks don't always work out, but shouldn't this be the model? And are we not in a place that we can try to implement this model? All we had to do is resign Colombo and then draft an OG with one of the first two picks.
The Texas Rangers have said that their goal is to develop one new pitcher a year so that they're not held hostage in free agency (it hasn't worked, so they've had to overspend in free agency). Unless you get a singular talent at a position, shouldn't that be the goal for the O-Line as well? That way you always have some form of continuity AND depth. This means you can use your growing cap space to re-sign your own guys who you know a lot about and occasionally playmakers (for example: Adalius Thomas with the Pats, Keyshawn Johnson with the Panthers last year, maybe Drew Brees with NO, even someone like TO).

by 




















