More opinion on Romo's contract
If you haven’t signed-in on the roll call in the previous post, go ahead and do it. It’s a good opportunity for everyone here to get to know each other and to make the BTB community a little livelier. So take a moment if you’re a regular or semi-regular to sign-in, and if you’re a lurker, this is the opportunity to jump into the fray. And I can guarantee your safety unless you say something bad about Tony Romo, and then all bets are off.
Also, there was a mention about a BTB fantasy football league. I would play in one, but I don’t have the inclination to be the commissioner. So if one of you guys wants to set a league up for BTB readers, I’m in as a participant. I’ll even cover the league on the front-page during the season.

Speaking of the man, the myth, The Romo; Pat Kirwan has his own take on Romo getting a new contract.
Tony Romo is the next quarterback who could be difficult to compare to other veterans. His election into the Pro Bowl last season complicates the whole issue. Had Donovan McNabb never gotten hurt and missed a significant part of the season, Romo likely would not have been voted into the Hawaii game but he was, and that changed everything.
Kirwan goes on to detail that even though Romo had a very good start to his burgeoning career, but it’s simply not enough game experience to justify a blockbuster contract. Because of that, the Cowboys probably wouldn’t offer the kind of contract that Romo would accept before the season. His conclusion:
The only way [Romo] does a deal now is if it includes big escalators or voids so they don't have to predict the future now. This preseason deal is even harder to do than the [Marc] Bulger deal. I predict both sides will wind up waiting until midseason at the earliest.
That’s been my guess too.

Some of you suggested that I do a series on the assistant coaches since so many of them are new to the Cowboys, or at least different from the Parcells regime. I was seriously thinking about doing it, and even started researching the guys. But then I saw that DC.com was doing a series on the assistants, and they have actual quotes from the coaches, so I’ll defer to them. They start with QB coach Wade Wilson.
Wade Wilson and Jason Garrett combined to back up a Cowboys quarterback once, and it worked out pretty well, seeing as Troy Aikman led the Cowboys to a Super Bowl XXX win in Wilson's first year as a player in Dallas.
And now they're backing up a new Cowboys starting quarterback, Tony Romo, in a different way: Having his back. That means keeping Romo's confidence up if he throws three interceptions in a game, fumbles a ball in crunch time or miss-reads a defense. Virtually everything Romo-related, save grief-counseling in the event Romo becomes the ex-Mr. American Idol.
Nice opening to the article.

The DMN blog was killing time in this, the depths of the dead season, by speculating on trading for RB Larry Johnson. BTB-regular Burt-D posted it in a diary, here. It’s led to some good discussion. Even though I like Larry Johnson a lot as a RB, he’s got power and moves, I think I’d rather take my chances with the JJ/MB3 duo this year, then set my sights on DMac in the draft next year.

Also making an appearance in the diaries is MysterD’s post about SI.com ranking the top 25 receivers in the game. Terrell comes in at #5:
- Terrell Owens, Dallas Cowboys: The controversial superstar led the league in touchdown receptions in 2006, but suffered a down year by his standards. Though his season totals should have earned him Pro Bowl accolades, his high number of drops diverted attention away from his positive impact on the Dallas offense. Fully recovered from a wrist injury and playing in an offense that will accentuate his strengths, he will have a big season as Tony Romo's favorite target in 2007.
And no Terry Glenn in the top 25. Hey, that’s OK, keep missing out on the Cowboys other receiver and let him continue to produce big for the Boys. Our silent, secret weapon.
0 recs |
24 comments
Comments
Jones is playing with fire
either way on the Romo contract issue. If he doesn't wrap up Romo now, not wanting to risk huge money if he fails, then Romo will wait out the season and demand really huge money after a successful season.
Jerry has always been a gambler, so I would be surprised if he doesn't gamble and try to get Romo locked into a contract that will be much less expensive than one which he would sign in the future and could save him millions under the cap.
My prediction is if Romo doesn't sign before the season, then Jones will have to pay a really huge contract to him at some point after the season, I'm talking at least 100 million compared to 60 or 70 million.
by Terry on Jun 26, 2007 9:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It is a risk
either way. QBs are top money guys and you can kill your franchise for years to come if you make a mistake. On the other hand, Romo looks like the real deal and Jones has already committed a lot to him - coaching staff, this past year's draft (as in not taking a possible replacement), big money on linemen and WRs...
I think Jones is a smart business guy and will look to mitigate his risk and maximize the financial benefit of signing earlier. So my money - OK his money - is on a mid-season signing after Romo has cemented his status, but before others can enter into a bidding war. It will be lucrative but not ludicrous. Romo will accept slightly less-than-market out of loyalty and royalty. Loyalty because the team took a chance on him and believed in him. Royalty because a high profile team will add immensely to his off-field opportunities, much as P. Manning has been able to do with endorsements.
by dunkman on Jun 26, 2007 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really don't quite understand how
Glenn gets overlooked either, except maybe the insane media focus on TO. He is both fast and shifty, has fantastic hands, runs great routes and makes plays. To me he is the Dallas version of Santana Moss, who gets at least some props. But Grizz is right. Forget about him at your own risk...
by dunkman on Jun 26, 2007 10:22 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not even going to touch the Romo contract...
because your damned if you do and damned if you don't!
Romo does seem willing to accept coaching so lets hope Wilson is a good one. The stent at Chicago does not impress me, but then again the qbs he was working with don't have Romo talent. The part about keeping his confidence up in the event of multiple fumbles, or interceptions well that's ok,...I guess; but should this become part of his resume then, hey guess there will be another completely different line of thinking in contract negotiations, ( Chill Terry, I don't expect this to happen, but you always have to consider Murphy's Law. ).
Larry Johnson? How bad would it have to get in KC for them to trade this guy? However, then again who wants a malcontent? Good back, don't know if I want him on my team. If he leaves I hope he doesn't come to the NFC East.
Top 25 receivers? I guess this kind of ranking might be useful in drafting fantasy football teams; although I'm not sure I would go from this list.
I'm sure that defensive coordinators will pay attention to Terry, but then again can the defensive backs cover Glenn, Owens, Whitten, Crayton possibly Barber ( and possibly someone else )along with covering the run and draw and if they do does Romo go for 10 or 15? I'm hopeful the line can hold its own this year and more receivers will be available to Romo.
by Badknees on Jun 26, 2007 10:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Man
I gave you at least two Johnny Cochran lines on the contract. Use them, that's what they're here for!
by dunkman on Jun 26, 2007 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he doesn't fit, he don't get ......?
by Badknees on Jun 26, 2007 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats what I am talking about
I think I’d rather take my chances with the JJ/MB3 duo this year, then set my sights on DMac in the draft next year.
by Arkcowboys on Jun 26, 2007 2:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Johnson
We get Larry Johnson we are instantly the clear cut favorite in the NFC, hands down.
But we also maybe sacrifice ourselves in 3-4 years.
So ask yourself this question. Would you trade a Super Bowl this year or next year for having to look for another RB in 3-4 years??
by mhuff13 on Jun 26, 2007 3:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
But
that assumes that RB is a clear area of weakness. I think it's not. In my (admittedly tiny) mind, places to spend money/draft picks to get to the Super Bowl would be:
- Safety
- D-line
- O-line
- LB
- CB
I recognize any or all MIGHT be good to go this year, but they might not be.
by dunkman on Jun 26, 2007 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why is everybody worried about safety?
Come on you can take a fast second CB and make him a top notch FS and you can take a bigger second level CB or a smaller faster (faster than Roy) LB and make him him a strong saftey ( I tend to lean toward the bigger CB route). NT is legit need. But if those late round CB don't come through then thats up there with it. RB depends on what happens with who we have now, but honestly I would break the bank for either of them.
by Badknees on Jun 26, 2007 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Safety
because it was so bad last year and Hamlin and Watkins have a question mark or two tied to them. CB can be coverted, but not in time for this season.
by dunkman on Jun 26, 2007 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh man, your talking about this season?
We are set this season! Were we are thin is CB and NT if something happens there we are in trouble! More the former than the latter.
by Badknees on Jun 26, 2007 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hamlin
I really think Hamlin will do well for us this year. For me, by far, DT and WR will be our needs next year. Fergy can't do it all himself, and TO/TG are getting up there in age. You want to draft a stud WR now that won't have to be the #1 for a few years.
by mhuff13 on Jun 26, 2007 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I totally disagree
Getting LJ doesn't make us anymore favorites than we are right now as JJ and MB3 can certainly match LJ's production, just look at last season.
Larry Johnson 1,789 ru yds 17 ru TD's
JJ/MB3 1,738 ru yds 18 ru TD's
With an improved line, the combo of JJ/MB3 should even be more productive.
by Terry on Jun 26, 2007 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure
They matched the production, and honestly a 2 headed monster is probably better. Then the RB wont have to carry the load LJ has had to.
But Terry, can you really say KC's offense is anywhere near the potential of Dallas's?
Sure Gonzo > Witten, but not by much these days.
Green is decent, but I'm with you on Romo and I think he's going to be a superstar.
Patrick Crayton would have been the Chief's #1 WR, let alone TO and TG.
LJ in this offense, with the other weapons around him...and the potential of this defense...is frightening. 2000 yards and 20+ TD would be a real possibility.
I think it would make us instant favorites in the NFC. But then again, I don't want to salvage the future for a 2-3 year rental.
by mhuff13 on Jun 26, 2007 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only problem is that production could be so
much higher with MB3 getting majority of the carries
by Burt D on Jun 26, 2007 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crystal Ball
There's no way to look into it and see if MB3 could carry the load himself. Anyone who says he could/could not is kidding themselves.
by mhuff13 on Jun 26, 2007 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What
and you think we are going to the SB this and next - LOL
unproven coach
unproven play caller
unproven QB
unproven O line
and if we Draft Dmac
by Arkcowboys on Jun 26, 2007 6:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tom Brady & Belichick
were also unproven when they won SB XXXVI
by Terry on Jun 28, 2007 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What
and you think we are going to the SB this and next - LOL
unproven coach
unproven play caller
unproven QB
unproven O line
by Arkcowboys on Jun 26, 2007 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















