Film review: Cowboys vs. Bears (offense and special teams)
I can tell you watching the game over again for the film review is much more fun when we are winning. No matter what happens, if we make a bad play, it always turns out OK in the end. So keep winning Cowboys.
Offensive film review
QB – Let me preface this with a note about Tony Romo. He’s been phenomenal and I’m thrilled at the prospect of him being our QB for years to come. Jerry can’t sign him soon enough. So I’m a fan, a huge fan of Romo. But here’s a news flash for members of the Cult of Romo, he does make mistakes. I know; that is blasphemy in some quarters where Romo is the subject of ever-growing Bill Brasky tall tales or Chuck Norris facts. I think I’ll treat him just like any other Cowboy, pointing out what I like and critiquing mistakes I believe he made. OK, enough said on that subject.
In this game, Romo again flashed his ability to make pass rushers miss, to sense when danger is imminent and to hit receivers for big plays at critical times. You can go through all his stats which are magnificent, but the big thing for me is his ball security. He hasn’t fumbled this year and has only thrown two INT’s, including one this week on a high throw that was tipped in the air and picked off. His decision-making was solid and his calm under pressure doomed the Bears who were depending on their pass rush to stop the Cowboys passing game.
Besides the INT, Romo also had some misfires in the first half which seems to be a pattern and his bad passes tend to be high. I don’t know why, but he settles in after a quarter or so and really hits his groove in the second half. The twist in this game was in the first half he actually had better protection than the second half, but he was more accurate and made bigger plays in the second half while on the move from the pass rush. You figure it out.
RB – Julius Jones is cursed. Every time he has a big play in the past few games it’s called back for a penalty. This week he had a long screen pass called back on a phantom penalty against Witten and he had a big run up the gut that ended close to the goal line but Flozell was called for holding. Besides those two plays he had a couple of decent runs, a good run after a pass catch, and a good blitz pick-up that saved Romo. In fact, JJ looked about as good as I’ve seen him in a while during the game, but his numbers don’t reflect his effort. Marion Barber just keeps doing what he does which is run hard, gain yards and score TD’s. MB3 had the last four plays on the Cowboys second TD drive, running three times and catching a swing pass that he turned into a TD by running over Adam Archuleta. In the fourth quarter when Dallas wanted to kill the clock they gave MB3 the ball on eight consecutive runs including his 54-yard jaunt and his second TD. On the negative side, MB3 missed a blitz block that led to pressure and an incomplete pass, and also had confusion on a blitz pick-up assignment with Deon Anderson that led to an Urlacher sack. Tyson Thompson saw limited duty in garbage time.
WR – Terrell Owens dominated the game with crossing patterns and his ability to run after the catch. CB Charles Tillman tried to shadow Owens but was repeatedly burned. Romo and Owens have developed a real chemistry and whenever Romo is in trouble he looks for Owens. Terrell will still bobble a catch every now and then and he picked up two penalties, although one was ridiculous, but he was the dominant offensive player on the field besides Romo. Patrick Crayton had a big, huge, visible blunder. When you drop a sure TD that is right in your hands and with nobody else in the vicinity, it’s a rough night. He was also involved in Romo’s INT, although after watching the play in frame-by-frame replay the ball was high and to his right and he only got the top part of his right hand on the ball and none of his left hand. So that’s more on Romo than Crayton and had little to do with his finger. He did end up with three catches on the evening.
Sam Hurd had two plays in the game and they were noticeable plays. On a T.O. crossing route he blind-sided Archuleta with a block that was a thing of beauty, unless you’re Archuleta. He followed that up with a 25-yard catch against broken coverage in the Bears’ secondary. I never saw Miles Austin line up at receiver and he made no catches or significant contributions.
TE – Jason Witten was the compliment to Owens that made the Bears’coverage pick their poison. Witten had numerous big catches on the evening including a TD pass. He is also much-improved in his blocking since entering the league, he is no longer just a pass-catching TE but a blocking one, too. He got called for a ridiculous block in the back penalty on JJ’s screen pass, which actually was a great block and further shows his skills. Anthony Fasano was used mostly in a blocking role and caught one short pass. He had a chance at a TD catch in the game but Romo overthrew the pass. I didn’t see Tony Curtis play so no report on him.
FB – Deon Anderson was the "starter" but the Cowboys actually used their TE’s in the FB role for most of then night. Only toward the end and on some short-yardage plays did Anderson see the field much. I saw him get a couple of good blocks but he also confused a blitz assignment with MB3 that led to a sack.
OL – The offensive line is getting the job done, but lately they’ve been much better in pass protection than in run blocking. Against the Bears, they just couldn’t produce holes for the backs until later in the game when their size began to dominate. In the passing game, they started to get beat by blitzes in the second half but Romo saved them repeatedly. The guy who hardly made any mistakes was Marc Colombo. He had a few standard missed blocks, but for the most part he played extremely well. Leonard Davis had a few bad errors, he was beat by Tommie Harris on the pass rush causing a Romo scramble-and-throw, he was hit with a holding call, blew a couple of run blocks and was culpable (along with snapper Ladouceur) for the blocked FG. He did have a highly visible pancake block on a JJ screen.
Andre Gurode also had a few problems with Bears interior line, as did Kyle Kosier. Gurode and Kosier left a gap between them on a blitz and the Bears ran right through it for a sack and both had problems on run blocks throughout the game. Gurode did have an excellent blocking picking up Lance Briggs on a full-speed blitz and stoned him. Flozell Adams had problems all night. He led the game off by allowing a Romo sack, he got called for two holding penalties and a false start and he let his man in a couple of times forcing Romo to scramble. Flozell’s game could have been better. But, having said all that, the offensive line had plenty of plays where they gave Romo time and they protected him enough for him to get the job done. Plus, the Bears defense was attacking the run with 8 and 9-men lines while blitzing frequently; and they are a talented group so the Dallas line gets a good grade even though they have looked better.
Special teams review
Kick and punt coverage – Excellent. All week we worried about Devin Hester but he was a total non-factor. Guys like Pat Watkins, Sam Hurd, Keith Davis and Bobby Carpenter made sure Hester went nowhere. Davis poked the ball lose for a fumble and Watkins had a great tackle on coverage. Watkins also was smart enough to cover the guy going out for a pass on the fake FG and let Nate Jones close down on the kicker and snuffed the play.
Kick and punt return – Tyson Thompson bobbled a kickoff out of bounds and finished with a poor night on returns. Miles Austin got a holding penalty on a return and Patrick Crayton caught his punts but didn’t really return them.
Punter – Mat McBriar did a good job of angling his punts to the corner or making Hester fair catch them.
Kicker – Nick Folk had his first bad plays of the season. His first kickoff went out of bounds and he had a kick blocked, even though that wasn’t really his fault. But he hit all his extra-points, made two more FG’s and the rest of his kickoffs were OK.
And a special shout out to Pat McQuistan, who ran across and down the field to knock Archuleta out of bounds after the blocked FG. At first, I thought the Bears were going to score, but big McQ came out of nowhere to make the tackle. Great hustle.
0 recs |
34 comments
Comments
This is how I know you are a genius:
You made a reference to Bill Brasky while talking about Tony Romo. I did the same thing at work today.
I too have been watching the film for my Blue Star review, and was VERY impressed by Julius Jones. I think the Rams game may be his breakout game of the season.
Still love me some MB3 though.
Blue Star Review up later tonight.
by Brandon Worley on Sep 25, 2007 6:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Julius and MB3 bring different things
... to the table.
Julius' speed is a dangerous weapon in open space. He's also a great blocker. Can you say 3rd down weapon?
MB3 is a punishing runner, but missing those blocks is exactly what kept him off the field with Parcells. Why not rotate them within the series, with MB3 in for 1st down, and JJ with longer-play packages. Why does this get so much press/discussion yet you never see it?
by DalaiLuke on Sep 25, 2007 8:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
JJ brings more breakaway threat
that is effective on 1st and 2nd downs - especially out of the red zone. So it's not just which down but field position as well. Since we run different plays for each player (per Coach Phillips) we also might want a particular player for a planned sequence. Finally when one player is smoking you stay with him longer.
by lee3022 on Sep 26, 2007 1:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see where u see this
breakaway threat in Julius...I'd bet Marion has more runs of 20+ per carry than Julius, and that's not saying much. Just don't see Julius as a breakaway threat cuz he rarely breaks away...
I also don't see where Julius' presence helps the passing game as you suggest; he's not that much of a threat, as teams rarely throw 8 in the box against him. Less men in the box means more in secondary, making it more difficult to throw, no?
by Starred4Life on Sep 26, 2007 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
then you obviously haven't watched every game
the last few years or have a poor memory because JJ has broken off 4 or 5 very long runs for TD's in his career so far. I'm not saying thats a lot, but its more than MB3 which is zero.
MB3 had a chance break one off Sunday but didn't have the speed to get it in. If that was JJ, he would have scored very easily.
by Terry on Sep 26, 2007 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
40 and 54 yd runs.
Last year, Jones had 1 40+, and 5 20+ runs. MB3 had 4 20+ and no 40+, but on half the carries.
by mlibbey on Sep 27, 2007 1:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If that was JJ last Sunday
there's no way he shrugs off a diving Urlacher as MB3 did.
Ya know the weird thing about JJ? For a short RB, he runs awfully 'top-heavy'...I can't recall another RB with JJ's shorter body type that ran top-heavy...
by Starred4Life on Sep 27, 2007 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ya know what
Watched the game again last night (I love me some TiVo!), and I saw JJ actually shed Urlacher on a screen pass that was called back.
So JJ may have in fact shed Urlacher as MB3 did cuz he did it earlier...I stand corrected.
by Starred4Life on Sep 28, 2007 8:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Read!!
Good read on the game! I made up a personal blog of my own, everyone feel free to check it out and post a comment on my latest entry concerning my thoughts on the Cowboys!!
by DaveTroll on Sep 25, 2007 7:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Love the Blog, Dave Troll... Keep posting, Bro!!!
by kcbrett5 on Sep 25, 2007 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Offensive Line concerns me...
Trouble with run blocking... and if any other QB than Romo... trouble with pass blocking.
I think that we have decent players, I'd just like to see them start to play better.
I wouldn't mind seeing us go after another top FA as well as use a top draft pick here. A solid O-Line equals long-term success. Look at NE, Pittsburgh, the Colts...
Great read, GRIZZ... best assessment of the game I've read so far.
by DalaiLuke on Sep 25, 2007 8:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I seem to remember
a number of articles over the years about the great O-lines and all of them had been together for many years before achieving greatness. Not sure in the free agency era whether that is even possible anymore. But it is reasonable to expect them to get better each game. They certainly have owned the 4th quarter.
by lee3022 on Sep 26, 2007 1:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It appears to me
that that is the approach they are taking. Free looks a like a keeper, and McQ may also be. certainly I agree that O-line is the second most important factor in the offense after QB.
by dunkman on Sep 26, 2007 9:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought Romo was consistent
throwing the ball in both halfs, the difference being his receivers were catching the ball in the second half.
You can blame Romo for high throws if you want, but pro receivers have to catch anything that hits their hands or fingers and I didn't see any passes that didn't hit a receivers hands. Any other incomplete passes were intentionally overthrown to avert INTs.
You can't complete every pass perfectly, its just not possible. To say Romo made some bad passes considering all the really great ones he makes is really nit picking to me. So what if he throws an incomplete pass every once in a while.
by Terry on Sep 25, 2007 8:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Bears in Man or Zone?
Another really nice article, Grizz. I've heard some mention that the Bears secondary was in zone coverage for most the game, and that was the reason Owens had so much success.
When you watched the game, did you notice if the Bears were mixing up their coverages, or put Vasher or Tillman on him in man coverage?
by kindablue on Sep 25, 2007 8:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It's really hard to tell
not having an all-22 view. Picking out coverages is the hardest thing to do in these reviews because I'm at the mercy of the camera angles. I saw them playing some Cover-2, the hole between the LB's and the safeties was obvious. I also saw Tillman on T.O., whether it was a man-to-man or some kind of combination coverage.
In other words, that's one thing I really don't know.
by Dave Halprin on Sep 25, 2007 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking that last Sunday
How cool it would be if you could get the same tape that the ESPN analysts are scoring.
by dunkman on Sep 26, 2007 9:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah
I would LOVE to be able to watch those tapes, why don't they release them to the public?
by ChrisRichey on Sep 26, 2007 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
article
Thanks, Grizz.
I know people say this all the time to you, but we out here luv these write-ups. It's good to have someone go back over and over the film to lay it all out for us.
"That McQuisten" is my guy!!!
by brushpile on Sep 25, 2007 8:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure it was Deon's fault
but he is a rookie, he'll learn
by Burt D on Sep 25, 2007 8:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
rookie
Yes, he will learn.
We really have some upside on several players that will make our team even better.
Watkins, Anderson, Spencer, "Tank" beginning to play, Newman coming back full time, Spencer(is good now but will get a LOT better, Terry Glenn coming back.
That's a lot!
by brushpile on Sep 25, 2007 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Am I alone in wondering
what Hurd could do with more playing time? I am not trying to start another JJvsMB3 type of never ending argument but it was just a thought.
by BigE on Sep 25, 2007 8:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hurd
I've thought the same thing, but we are already killing them with T.O and Whitten.
I predicted that Hurd and Fasano and other "secret" weapons would be used heavily in the Bears game. I thought we would need them more, but we never needed them much.
I like the way Hurd plays though. I wonder what he could do if we used him more. With the TV you can't see how open a receiver is if he isn't thrown to and we didn't throw to him much so I don't know how open he was. I'd like to know though.
by brushpile on Sep 25, 2007 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
On Hurd's big pass catch
he seemed to line up and go in motion just as Terrell had been doing. So I suspect that was simply rewarding him for the great block and otherwise would have padded Owen's total. I like the guy and know his future with us must be bright.
by lee3022 on Sep 26, 2007 1:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
McQuisten's Play
Really saved the game for us IMO. If he doesn't make that tackle, the game is 10-3 Bears (I think that was when it was 3-3, I'm tired and too lazy to make sure). Regardless, if the Bears get that TD, the crowd is going crazy and who knows...Rex may have fed off that energy and played better.
A game ball surely should have gone to him for that outstanding hustle play.
by mhuff13 on Sep 25, 2007 8:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
reminded me of an allen play
The McQ run down reminded me of a Larry Allen play. From wikipedia, "late 1994, Allen made his first NFL start on Monday night against the New Orleans Saints. Early in the game, Saints cornerback Robert Massey picked off a Troy Aikman pass at the Saints 35-yard line and appeared on his way to an easy return touchdown. Allen, all 326 pounds of him, ran the 210-lb. Massey down from behind and prevented him from scoring."
by mlibbey on Sep 27, 2007 1:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember watching that one
Amazing play.
by dunkman on Sep 27, 2007 6:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Know how I know you're a Romosexual?
Great review.
Romo as long as we've watched him has started slower and gotten better as games go on. Is it the Brett Favre "get the adrenaline down" or the mounting pressure that sharpens his focus? A mystery fer sure.
The Flo holding call looked like he was just being lazy, not wanting to drive his assignment. Not a good thing.
And no more comments on Nick. He was folkin awesome. Nuff said.
by dunkman on Sep 25, 2007 9:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It's Official: Gramatica Kicked to da Curb...
With Nick Folk's early production, it was "automatica" that Martin Gramatica would get the heave-ho.
Click the link to read...
http://cowboys.beloblog.com/archives...
by kcbrett5 on Sep 25, 2007 9:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
for another superb game review, Dave.
Glad someone is pointing out the good work that Julius Jones is doing even though it hasn't been resulting in gaudy stats. MB3 is a thriller, for sure, but I think it helps that he comes in fresh against a fatigued defense. Barber and Jones make a powerful combo, and I hope we don't change it.
McQ is a Cowboy.
by OskieOskie on Sep 25, 2007 10:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice work
There was one running play in the 2nd half I think where MB3 had a big hole and only one player to beat (probably a safety) and that player tackled him for a 4 or 5 yard gain. What I remember was Gurode, I think, down at linebacker level watching MB3 come into the hole and making no effort to get the safety who was an easy target from the side. Anyone else remember that play?
Excellent analysis Dave. Thanks for all your hard work.
by lee3022 on Sep 26, 2007 1:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
One more thing
Time of possession was 35:21 Cowboys and 24:39 Bears. That is a huge discrepancy and any defense on the field that long will be tired at the end. Our guys by contrast were flying around in the 4th quarter feeling fresh.
by lee3022 on Sep 26, 2007 1:40 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















