Extremely long thoughts on the game
I wrote this and I figured I would post here to see if yall agree/disagree and get your thoughts. This loss was just soul crushing and probably the most down I've ever been after a loss. I must be a masochist for wanting to go back and go over all the little things that went wrong. My focus is mostly on the 2nd half and what happened offensively.
Most times after a loss you can go back and point at one thing and say, yep, thats what did us in. After a loss like yesterday's, I'm so shell shocked because it was myriad of breakdowns whether it was a component of the team that didn't play well or a singular plays that you want to point out that greatly affected the outcome. Immediately after the game I was stunned. I couldn't put my finger on it. How exactly did we lose a game where late in the 3rd quarter I still felt extremely confident without a doubt in my mind that they would be fine? Then I thought about it. It was a laundry list of items that if one play went differently or one team unit played differently then maybe we'd be looking at an NFC championship game in Dallas next week. Thats what makes this one so tough to swallow. It took so much to go wrong for us to lose by 4 points. Those are always the toughest games to take.
You can say well this team just went into cruise control through December and you can't flip on the switch. I don't buy into that stuff. A wise ex-coach of this team once said "you are what are". I think this teams performance through the last month was more indicative of a regression to the mean, a team showing its true colors. The Cowboys aren't as good as they looked through the first part of the season, nor are they as bad as they looked through the last 5 games, Giants game included. It wasn't about turning off any switch and then fumbling to find that switch later on. Thats all BS to me.
Whereas the defense completely failed this team last year down the stretch, the high flying offense let the Cowboys down this time around. This doesn't absolve the defense of anything, because they certainly had their issues yesterday and have issues that need to be addressed in the off-season. Things like how can we get rid of Roy Williams, is Jacques Reeves really the best we can do at the nickel corner, and why isn't our front 7 capable of imposing their will on another team in terms of a suffocating pass rush (ala the Giants in the 2nd half) like we had hoped? However, lets be honest, this team is about its offense and when you average 15.4 points through your last 5 games, there will be problems. If you want to take out the Skins game, 17.75 ppg. Still unacceptable. Jason Garrett is clearly a rising star but his play calling in the latter part of the year needs to brought into question. Selfishly and truthfully, I'm not sure he's ready to be an NFL head coach.
I'm not an X's and O's expert but I don't believe Garrett managed the game effectively in the 2nd half. With the Giants secondary literally counting on practice squad players, we never took advantage. Credit the Giants for recognizing their problem and saying F it, we're coming after you and hopefully you can't get the ball away. Garrett and the Cowboys never made them pay for that. I assume the lack of throws to TO meant he was being doubled. The Giants manned up/doubled the crucial receivers, the D-line pinned their ears back, and said find a way to beat us. No other receivers stepped up and made plays. There are ways to thwart a blitz and there are ways to get your receivers in single coverage situations and the Cowboys didn't do it.
However, having said all that, two other things really killed the Cowboys offensively which limited Garrett's options and never allowed the offense to get into a rhythm offensively. Pass protection and mental mistakes. These two items put the Cowboys in poor down and distance situations. A good offense is all about getting yourself into manageable down and distances. If you don't, it makes it easy on the opposing defense. The Cowboys D deserves its share of the blame, especially for the 50 second drive at the end of the 1st half which changed the complexion of the game. However, the D gave the offense opportunities to extend or take lead in the 2nd half and it never happened because the offense put themselves in a bad situation on every one of its 2nd half drives.
I'll address the mental mistakes first. The dropped passes, the false starts, the personal foul on Davis, the intentional grounding that never should have been flagged but could have been avoided, and taking sacks when you really shouldn't have. All things poised and prepared teams do not do. The two biggest drops that stand out to me: Crayton's drop on 3rd and long, and Fasano's paddle hands in the endzone on our first drive in the 2nd half. If Fasano catches that ball then the Cowboys are up a TD early in the 2nd half. He didn't, then the Cowboys false started (mental mistake), Romo flutters a pass behind TO and we kick a FG. The defense holds with the help of a big sack from Ware and the offense has a chance to take a 10 point lead and force Eli to make plays. As a side note, I'm really annoyed at all this talk about how Eli has turned the corner and how hes made it now. Give him props for managing the game and driving the bus but if all you're asking for is Trent Dilfer thats awfully low expectations for a number 1 pick. He was never forced to make plays but thats the Cowboys fault. Back to the 2nd drive. Leonard's penalty puts the Cowboys at 2nd and 18. Romo finds Crayton streaking across the middle for a 1st down and then some if you consider the YAC... but he drops it. Who knows what would have been the end result of that drive but that drop prevented the Cowboys from taking control of that game. That play was with 1:18 left in the 3rd quarter. Before that I was still extremely confident. After that, fear started to creep in that we were letting them hang around. The Giants scored on their ensuing drive and then I'm flat out scared. Our next drive we moved into Giants territory but it was stamped out by Romo taking an ill advised sack when he could have and should have gotten the ball away. I don't have many qualms with how Romo played yesterday besides the two sacks that he took. Beyond that, he wasn't really given a chance by his O-line's shoddy pass protection. This leads to the other downfall of the Cowboy's yesterday.
The O-line has been brought into question this year over their run blocking but the pass blocking has been stellar for the most part. My theory for what happened yesterday was a lack of conditioning. We moved down the field in the 1st half with some epicly long drives. Commonly accepted notion would be that the effects of this would really wear on the Giants D in the 2nd half. What seemed to happen instead was that the O-line looked slow coming out of their stances and too gassed to effectively move around and protect Romo in the 2nd half. Perhaps if the Cowboys had the opportunity to pound the ball more in the 2nd half then we could have really worn on the Giants D. However, as mentioned before, our down and distance situations dictated otherwise. Its debatable though because MBIII actually looked tired in the 2nd half as well. Romo was under duress in all of the Cowboys last 3 drives. Two times he had TO and Austin deep but wasn't able to get enough on it because of a defender in his face. The false starts coupled with incompletions due to pressure repeatedly put the Cowboys in 3rd and long. The pass protection was so bad that Witten was forced to stay in on several occasions to help on rush pickup, including the Cowboys last offensive play.
Back to Garrett's playcalling one last time. The decision to run the ball on 2nd and 1 on the last drive ended up being fatal for the Cowboys. I suppose the rationale was to surprise them a bit with a draw, take advantage of the Giants aggressiveness, maybe pick up 10 yards, then spike the ball. What ended up happening was there seemed to be some space for him to run, but a tired Barber got arm tackled, ran into his lineman, lost the ball after hitting the ground, a bit of a scrum ensued... and the clock kept ticking. Even if he picked up a nice chunk of yards, the end result of the play was almost inevitably the clock still running. The Cowboys started on the 48 with 1 TO and 1:50 left, an extremely manageable situation. The Cowboys managed to run only 3 plays in the next 1:19. The Giants managed to accomplish much more in 50 seconds to end the 1st half. Suddenly, :31 left, no timeouts and on the 22 yard line. A false start, a receiver quitting on his route, and a desperation heave into the endzone later, that was all she wrote. Theres a lot to look forward to with this team and we're definitely trending up, but this one sucked... more than any other Cowboys game I've ever watched.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
0 recs |
8 comments
Comments
yeah, the Crayton drop was the one for me
at that point we had the momentum and if that catch is made, I'm sure we at least kick a FG on that drive and are up by 6 instead of 3. Heck, we might have even scored a TD on that drive.
It was at that point in the game where I thought, oh, no, the mo is turning. All season long we make plays like that, it was really guy wrenching to see us fall apart at the seams after that drop.
by Terry on Jan 14, 2008 3:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
albyman32....great write up..
in fact, it's as if you read my mind completely...I would have written the same exact posting....thanks for saving me the time....you were dead on with your assessment...
and yeah...I guess we all could agree it came down to Crayton not handling that easily catchable ball..which from what i saw, surely would have been a TD, or put us very deep into Giants territory.
We needed him to come up strong for us yesturday, with TG and TO hobbled..fresh off a new contract extention, show the world you deserved it...He failed miserably. I wonder what everyone would think of Crayton being resigned, if he hadn't already ? I will never think of him as a #1 or #2 receiver...that's for sure.What kills me, IMO he has/had the best hands on the team.
I'm not pinning this lose solely on him though, It was a team failure....from coaches on down...heck, can even put blame on Jerry too, for not aquiring better depth in the secondary prior to the season.
I foresee wholesale changes....hopefully Jerry see's exactly what I see wrong with this team. I know Wade does not want Roy and Reeves...I can clearly sense this...I am sure he will ask for something to be done with them. Reeves is a free agent, so that problem will be easily released. As hard as it may be to take a cap hit, Roy must be let go, or somehow package him in a trade.
We MUST aquire a top cover CB in the mold of Asante Samuels or Nnamdi Asomugha. These two CB's are better than T Newman, and i'd surely give ethier one of them Clements type money or more to aquire them. Just to let you in on a interesting note, Asomugha has been thrown at a total of 27 passes to the receiver he was covering, and the opposition has completed a total of --->> 7 <<-----passes through the first 15 games this past season...NOW THAT <br> IS A SHUT DOWN CORNER. The guy has given up seven completions allllllll year...Pay the man. He's 6'2" 210lbs...He may very well get franchised, and I'd give up our #30/1st pick this year, and next years #30/1st for him. That's how badly this CB problem needs to be addressed.
We need a CB that can actually line up across the receiver, instead of lining up 7-12 yards off the line of scrimmage like ours do.It drives me nuts to watch a game and can't even see our corners on the TV screen when they show the beginning of plays at the line....enough already.
If we don't draft "2" top CB's within the first 2-3 rounds, I'll be assured that Jerry has no friggin' glue how to run a team. That would give us, counting Newman, Henry, and top tier FA CB, and the two rookies, 5 very good defensive backs, eventually moving Henry to FS or flat out releasing him down the road.
MBIII finally was given a chance to see what he can do as a starter, and by golly...he sure looked great for 30 minutes. Of course 'ole reliable JuJO tried to spell him, but at 2.8 yards a carry, why even bother running ? MBIII was out of gas in the second half, no doubt, he gave it his all, and I was so excited to see what a real running game looks like. That being said, He needs a back of equal or better ability to come in and take some of the load. Someone that if MBIII should go down with a bruised knee, or another ailment can come in and take over the game/s in his absense...ummm...kinda like Michael Turner, who I've wanted badly for years.. With the amount of RB's entering the draft, His value may not surge as much as one expected. Any team looking for a franchise/ feature back, may be inclined to select a top rookie, in the first or second rounds. If we would be able to sign Turner for a reasonable contract, I'd be inclined to take him to share RB duties with MBIII as well as return kicks. He is a "proven" commodity, career 5-6 yards a carry guy, bigger than MBIII and faster. This would give us the option to go CB and WR in the first few rounds. IF we don't go that route, then Felix Jones is a must have back.
WHY OH WHY can't the Dallas Cowboys run an effective screen play? for the life of me, i'll never uderstand how I see every other team in the league pull it off, yet we never able to...cuz our lineman are so damn big and fat and aren't adept to get out front and lead a surge into the second phase? None of our lineman are built for run blocking, big immovable objects that do fine pass blocking against smaller Dlineman, We need a road gradder at LG with qickness to get to the second level, or pull outside on an off tackle play....
I'd sure love me some Alan Fanaca, may cost alot..but if we don't upgrade at CB in FA, we sure the heck will have the money for another top flight O lineman, who has at least 3 great years left in him. I don't know if we are resigning Flo or not.. I say we put the franchise tag on him and use him for one more year. I am not confident enough to hand the reigns over to Free or McQuistan quite yet.
Roy Williams, and/or Bobby
Carpenter, and/or a
forth round pick to either Cincy or Detroit for Chad Johnson or Roy Williams WR....I think it's all but a done deal that Terry Glenn will not be here next year, he clutched a handful of turf, as he was the last player off the field after the game, which is exactly what i did my last game....that spells retirement, I will surely miss TG....he was a great player and model citizen...
OH yeah...can we actually draft a top level FB to maybe put a dent in the line so we don't run up the back of our lineman each play...Owen Schmitt in the 3rd round would make me one happy guy... How much productivity do you expect to get out of a converted linbacker that can't run, pass,run block, or pass protect ??? enough already....trade up in the third if we have to....He will be there in the 3rd round...watch...
Even if we make some of these moves that I suggested, we will be a much better team..If we don't do any of these things....look for much of the same in '08.
by BoyzRback07 on Jan 14, 2008 5:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
i like that
idea of picking up turner and a FA cb and/or OG. those could change the whole perception of the team's strengths/weaknesses. i like that. owen schmitt... also a good idea. the name hadnt come to mind until i just read it but he's a solid fb and should be at the next level. at least (as you put it) better than a converted linebacker. well said..
by eMBe3 on Jan 14, 2008 7:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Samuels and Asomugha aren't better than TNewman
by Terry on Jan 14, 2008 8:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
paying up
paying up for free agent corners is the quickest way to salary cap hell
we'd be better off drafting a CB every round and trying to find WR, RB, OG from free agency and walk ons
Not that i reccomend that...
by 325424 on Jan 14, 2008 9:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ok....if we take that route...
We sign Michael Turner-RB, Alan Fanaca-OLG, and Bryant Johnson-WR in free angency...then draft CB's with our top 3 picks...FB in the third and a SS in the fourth....I'm all for it...
by BoyzRback07 on Jan 14, 2008 10:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Take your blinders off ....geeez...
They certainly are better, Not only in my opinion, you'll see that TNew will get less of a contract than either one of them....how can you explain that ?...Both statistically, and through voting of NFLPA, and Football Writers of America, and fan Pro Bowl balloting....Ask any player, coach, or GM who's better...if YOU don't want to believe it.
Should change your screen name to "Homer"
by BoyzRback07 on Jan 14, 2008 10:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on our needs
We must must must address RB and DB in the draft. A WR would be nice too. If we're lucky that WR will surprise us and be capable of being a no. 2. If not, I think there are bigger problems on the team to worry about than Crayton being our number 2 receiver. Luckily for us, RB, DB, and WR are all deep positions in a very deep draft. A change of pace RB ala Jamaal Charles, Felix Jones, Steve Slaton, or Anthony Aldridge would be excellent. We can address this need in the draft. I'd prefer to address our needs in the secondary through FA or trade but I fear that may be too costly with all the impending FAs the Cowboys have coming up. I have a hard time trusting a rookie DB with a crucial role.
Flozell will probably be the toughest roster decision the Cowboys have to make this offseason. Hes gettin up there in age but can we really trust McQuistan or Free at LT. A decision like that could be crippling for this offense as we all know how crucial LT is. Would be a shame if that handicaps us so I'm on board with the idea of franchising Flo. I think its the smart move.
by albyman32 on Jan 14, 2008 9:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















