Cowboys vs. Bengals: What They're Saying
Welcome to a conflicted edition of What They're Saying. In the broad sense, I'm happy we won, but not particularly happy with the way we played. Sometimes we get caught up in having a black-and-white view of things, where something is either this, or it's that, with no in-between. Human beings are quite capable of holding two opposing views in their head at one time. In an effort not to seem wishy-washy, we occasionally place all our eggs in one basket, even though we know that's blocking out part of the story. For instance, I can love having Tony Romo as our QB, but I can also hate the turnovers and inconsistent play during games. I can love T.O.'s big-play ability but I can hate the way he constantly draws attention to himself (and he's no longer the pod-person of last year, but much more emotionally complex this year). I can love the record Wade Phillips has put up as a head coach, but I can hate the laissez-fare attitude he projects and the sometimes uninspired football his team plays. These things are possible and we'll see them in this edition of What They're Saying.
Let's start with Tony Romo. We're used to Romo playing it cool in interviews with an aw-shucks attitude that belies his competitive fire. Rarely does he seem ruffled after the game but his comments after the maddeningly close win on Sunday show a hint of frustration. For example, when asked about limiting his turnovers that include a string of eight straight games.
"You wish you could, but you're just not going to see 11 defensive players on every play," he said. "If you never turn the ball over as a quarterback, you probably aren't going to be that good. There's no way you are going to make plays sometimes if you don't trust it and let it go."
There's truth in that. Risk-takers tend to be the stars in sports. The belief in your abilities is one of the things that allow a talented player to go beyond the norm. We might as well stamp "Take the good with the bad" on Romo's forehead. But the constant questioning does seem to be getting under what is a very thick-skin.
"During the game, you always want things to be perfect," said quarterback Tony Romo, who threw three touchdown passes for the third time this season. "I don't know what standard everybody wants it to be. We want to get every first down and score every time we touch the ball. Is it unrealistic? Probably, but we're going to strive for that. Are we disappointed or something? I mean all we can do is work as hard as we can. What else can we do?"
The inflated expectations for this Cowboys team has set a very high standard. Rightly or wrongly, a team with this much talent is expected to put away a 0-4 team with much less difficulty that the Cowboys did on Sunday. Part of that difficulty was the two turnovers and some passes that were far off target. After getting up 17-0, the Cowboys faltered.
"You get up 17-0 with a chance to put a team away, and you can't do that," tight end Jason Witten said. "You have to learn from that."
I think that's what the point is, not that the Cowboys didn't win the exact way we wanted. But that the Cowboys clearly showed they are a far superior team early and still managed to let an out-manned Bengals team stay in the game. Romo is taking the long-view.
"You don't get crowned champions for being the best looking team right now," Romo said. "You just keep continuing to get better and keep stacking up wins."
You don't, but champions tend to keep their foot on the neck of an inferior opponent and don't let up. Sure it's early in the season but the excuse of not peaking now but later in the season is a weak one. It's a post-game rationalization that doesn't hold up. Why? Well, the general point is true, you want to peak in the playoffs. But just because you're not peaking now doesn't guarantee you'll peak later. Somehow it's just assumed when it's clearly not the case. It might happen, but there is no correlation that it will happen. Jerry Jones gets the fact that you need to deliver the knockout punch when you have an opponent staggered.
"I was so disappointed and upset that we didn't go up 24-3," Jerry said. "We dwelled on not getting the 24-3 lead a little too much and forgot how much football was left."
On the other hand, we did win the game and the Cowboys are 4-1. Generally, anytime a team is 4-1, the fan-base would be ecstatic. So there is something to be said about the unrealistically high expectations that have been placed on this team. I've fallen prey to that as have a lot of the media. But I think the Cowboys themselves have been a part of that too, and when reality doesn't match the expectations, people get defensive. Such as when Wade Phillips was asked about his team "stinking" after they got up 17 points.
"'You stink', I mean, jeez," Phillips said a little while later. "I didn't think it was that bad. People want you to make excuses for winning. I don't make excuses for losing."
Agreed, the Cowboys didn't stink after getting the lead. They did make plays later in the game that allowed them to get to 31 points and to win the game. Still, even Wade realizes there seemed to be a letdown after the excellent opening play of the Cowboys.
"I think it's a concern anytime you are up 17 points and somebody gets back in the game," Phillips said. "But they didn't get back enough to win. That's the big thing."
I guess a win is a win. You don't get style points on your record like you do in college football rankings.
Click the link below, there's plenty more of What They're Saying.

The Cowboys defense is one of those units who aren't getting style points. My number one issue with the defense on Sunday was the absolute lack of a pass rush. Carson Palmer had all day to throw in the pocket, and with the talent they have at receiver, the results were inevitable. We couldn't cover them. Yes, the secondary is not performing up to the expectations that were placed on it coming into the year but they could certainly have benefited from some kind of pass rush. Palmer is not a mobile QB yet the Dallas pass rush never exploited that. The defense does get some credit for holding the Bengals to FG's when they were handed a short-field, and at the end of the game they finally managed to look like they should have throughout the game.
"At the end of the day, when it's time to make plays, the defense is there," DeMarcus Ware said. "But I think the thing is we've got to make more plays at the beginning instead of the end."
Indeed. Yes you do. One guy on defense who made a big play later in the game was substitute Keith Davis. He prevented a 2-pt. conversion that would have tied the game at 24.
"I didn't see the ball. I was watching his eyes," Davis said. "When his hands went up for the ball, I just put my hands between his hands and tried to get the ball out of there."
Nice play, but overall this defense has yet to reach anything approaching championship form. Too often they are relying on the offense to bail them out. Says the sage-one:
"I don't know if we got better today, including myself," Zach Thomas said. "We've got to go back to the drawing board. ... At least we're getting our wins."
At least the Cowboys didn't fall into the trap that they did last week on offense. Offensive coordinator Jason Garrett called a much better game this week, allowing the Cowboys to take advantage of some of their best weapons - a massive offensive line and a pair of running backs who can get the job done. Garrett should be applauded for not making the same mistake twice and also for the fact that he got Felix Jones involved early and often.
"I just think he is too effective to not have [Felix] in critical situations," Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said. "To Jason's credit, he's coming in on critical situations. Today, arguably his plays were at [as] critical times as you could have."
Yes, El Gato is providing the perfect complement to Marion Barber and Garrett realized he needs them both in this offense. Last week's travesty of hardly any running plays and no touches for Felix was turned into a run-heavy offense that exploited the Bengals defense. And Felix is a classy guy, giving credit to the blockers and understanding that his time will come.
"I had some great blocks out there," Jones said. "[Marc] Colombo made a great block. It was pretty much just get to the end zone."
"I was very anxious," Jones said. "I'm a football player and I want to have the ball in my hands. But I'm patient."
And then there's T.O. He of the overblown media controversy all week leading up to the game. He only caught a couple of passes, although one of them was probably the biggest play of the game. What did he have to say after the game? Not much, he clearly wasn't interested in reviving last week's brouhaha.
"It was frustrating out there, but I kept with it; my teammates stuck with it," Owens said. "I'm more [than] being a number 81. I'm more about ... it's more than about a star being on my helmet."
After his big play, many observers noted that he put a towel over his head on the bench and let out a cry. Not sure what to make of that, but here's one teammate's observation.
"He's an emotional player," receiver Patrick Crayton said. "He knows he wears his heart on his sleeve. You will get that stuff. I love it, dude. He wants to win."
No one has ever doubted that T.O. wants to win.
So there you have it. Plenty of conflicted emotions and observations that are at cross-currents with each other. Romo made plays that won the game, but made mistakes that allowed the other team to hang around. A defense that held together at crucial times to make stops never was able to dominate the game. A team that won a football game, but didn't look that great doing it. All these things occurred so it's possible for the players and fans to be simultaneously pleased with the win but not so pleased with the play on the field.
Still, as the great Ebby Calvin "Nuke" LaLoosh once said: "I love winning...It's like, you know, better than losing!"
Wade Phillips and Tony Romo have a little "Nuke" LaLoosh in them.
"The bottom line is whether you win or not," Phillips said. "I think some teams would have lost this game."
"I'm sorry that I'm not sorry that we won," Romo said. "An ugly win is sometimes more important than a 50-7 win."
Comments
We have to be concerned when the Redskins and the Giants are playing much better ball than we are. They have fire and discipline. We have neither.
by Philosopher on
Oct 6, 2008 11:28 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The Giants looked dominating over the Seahawks, but remember only two weeks ago this winless team that we were supposed to have beaten up on and not let back into the game took the Giants to overtime and almost beat them. where was their fire and discipline that game? And the Skins didn’t look so fired up and disciplined during the first part of yesterday’s game when they went down 14-0 to the Iggles.
I would love to see the Boys dominate in all three phases, and they’re not doing so consistently. And the Skins and Giants are indeed playing great football overall and the NFC East is the beast. But there is no team in the league right now that has looked fired up and disciplined through every quarter of every game, including the Skins and Giants.
by scottmaui on
Oct 6, 2008 12:09 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Still WAY too early...
…to be talking about how other teams are playing. We’re not even close to the playoffs.
While I agree we should be crushing teams like the Bengals, remember all the neck-stepping the Patriots were inflicting on their opponents this time last year?
On a related note, was anyone else confused as to what the Bengals were trying to accomplish in their last drive of the game? Seems like Palmer should have been repeatedly heaving it down the field, instead it looked like they thought they had all the time in the world to score. When time finally ran out I actually felt bad that they didn’t put up more of a fight…
by Pete222 on
Oct 6, 2008 12:18 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
8 striaght games
in which Romo has an INT. The longest streak in the league. The part that bothers me the most is it came when the game was still in doubt. Is this something we as fans are just going to have to accept about Tony???
plus another fumble
he’s got to take better care of the football
those two turn overs lead two 2 field goals
could have been TD’s
then Terry would really be crying opps I mean we
because we would have lost that game
"May the wind always be at your back and the sun upon your face. And may the wings of destiny carry you aloft to dance with the stars
by GimmyJ on
Oct 6, 2008 11:44 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Lack of number 2 reciever is hurting us
There is a lot of double teaming of T.O and Witten going on and with the exception of the Green Bay game, nobody is stepping up to make them pay for it.
by mleklund on
Oct 6, 2008 12:01 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Give Austin time
that pass yesterday I doubt in any reciever comes down with it – TR had some heat on it
Crayton is playing much worse than expected
"May the wind always be at your back and the sun upon your face. And may the wings of destiny carry you aloft to dance with the stars
by GimmyJ on
Oct 6, 2008 12:04 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You mean the one that went through his hands??
Cowboys fan since 1978.. I was 3 years old
by Mullin on
Oct 6, 2008 12:04 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
rhythm
Austin needs to get in to a rhythm like any other WR.. He needs more balls in his direction.. How about some slants to show off his speed?
"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"
by Wmillion on
Oct 6, 2008 1:27 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
He looks smooth when he makes plays for big gains. Just needs more repetition.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on
Oct 6, 2008 6:14 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Romo
As much as I love what Tony does with the football and how sometimes he creates something out of nothing, I get very frustrated and pissed when he tries to force things that aren’t there. If a guy is triple covered, someone else HAS to be open. It may not be for the huge play, but it keeps Dallas on offense and enables us to score on the next play, maybe.
Cowboys fan since 1978.. I was 3 years old
by Mullin on
Oct 6, 2008 12:10 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Wade and Stewart better get this defense together
We are not playing up to expectations with all the talent on defense. We are regressing on defense for whatever reason. There has been no pass rush by this defense. We don’t create turnovers. We are allowing receivers too much cushion. Maybe the expectations are set too high for this defense and maybe this team. We haven’t beat a team with a winning record this season. This team is in trouble fellows and it started last week. TO better get his emotional head together and Wade better get his act together or his ticket out of town will be after the season. My patience is growing thin for easy Wade. This team is soft, especially on defense.
I don’t want to be a hater, but Nick and Nate Newton said today Zach doesn’t make plays. They said Miami knew what they were doing. Zach is a 4-3 LB, not a 3-4 ILB. I’m starting to agree with that. Bradie doesn’t make plays either as a matter of fact. Our run defense has suffered and I think part of that has something to do with those two.
While I’m hating……another player is Crayton. He doesn’t make plays. In the Irvin years when teams doubled him Alvin Harper made them pay for doubling him. John Taylor was that guy in SF with Jerry Rice. Crayton is not that guy. He is not running by anyone. That’s why we need a legite threat at the #2 spot. It’s that simple. Crayton hasn’t done squat in 4 weeks. That fact of the matter is we need another threat with speed. Boldin and Williams have to be on the radar in the off season.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Oct 6, 2008 12:13 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Are you going for the title of King of Haters?
You need to let go of the obsession with a stud #2 WR. Not happening this season. Maybe they find someone in the off-season, but I’d rather they lock up Colombo, Burnett and Ware.
Running game, Witten, Romo eliminating mistakes and TO’s explosiveness are the offense’s keys this season.
Crayton, Hurd, Austin, Bennett are the supporting cast.
As for slamming the ILB’s, that’s really hilarious coming from a guy who wants Carp to start.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on
Oct 6, 2008 6:25 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
King of Haters, Tom thats beautiful, LOL!!
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Oct 6, 2008 6:42 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hows your boy Stanback doing? That's right he's INACTIVE....
He is king of the inactives…lol So I was right when I said he would be on IR or Inactive for much of the season. Another waste…….
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Oct 6, 2008 6:45 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
of course he's inactive
I never ever said he would do anything this season, I said he’s the future at the WR position and thats true. To expect him to produce now is ridiculous.
You have to give him a few more years and you’ll be looking at a star, patience grasshopper, patience.
The only waste I see on team is your boy Barbie Carpenter, now there is a waste.
Also, I never said he wouldn’t be inactive but you said IR, not IR or inactive. Nice try, but you weren’t right.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Oct 6, 2008 6:52 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Terry he doesn't have two or three years.
We don’t have the depth for him sit the pine for that long.
He will be lucky to be on the team next year.
Sorry, I did say IR or Inactive. I first said IR then I said IR or Inactive.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Oct 6, 2008 6:59 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
One of these WRs
will be gone next year, because Jerry will go out and get a legite #2 in the offseason.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Oct 6, 2008 7:01 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hurd will be the WR gone after this season....count on it..
His contract is up, as is his chance to prove he’s better than Crayton……Your making a somewhat foolish argument about Stanback’s inactive status, when it’s known that only 4 WR’s are activated for each game, and he had sustained an injury.
…I have lost all faith in Crayton…I used to defend him because he at one time appeared to have the best hands of all the WR’s……now he’s just a slow, small, receiver with no seperation ability, and inconsistant hands….If we indeed aquire a top flight WR in the near future, I can see Crayton sent packing as well…..as I was not on board with his extension either…
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
"If you don’t take him off the field as a coach, he will just about die out there," Jerry Jones said. "That impacted my decision. It’s a Michael Irvin-type work ethic. That’s what we are talking about with Felix Jones."
- Owner/G.M of the Dallas Cowboys , Jerry Jones
by BoyzRback on
Oct 8, 2008 1:01 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Your right about not this season
but, your not in touch with reality if you don’t think Jerry doesn’t go after Williams, Boldin or another Wr in the offseason.
Like I said and knowbody can dispute it. When we had Irvin, Harper was on the other side to make defenses pay for doubling him. Crayton IS NOT that player. We NEED that player. It doesn’t have to be Boldin or Williams, but a player a heck of alot faster and talented than Crayton. Heck, everyone knows it to be true. Nick Eatman, Nate Newton said the exact same thing today on DC. com. Larry Brown and Norm said it last night on the Ticket. I know it, you know it.. everyone knows it. Crayton is and has been a non-factor in 4 weeks. The once sure handed WR, now has butter hands. He doesn’t seperate from CBs or make plays like we need him to.
As far as slamming our ILB’s. I always thought Bradie James was a average LB the reason he has never made a Pro Bowl. Our rushing defense has had some problems this season and alot of that points to James and Thomas as the ILBs. It’s there job to make the tackles and create pressure when they blitz. I’m just pointing out what Nate and Nick were talking about today that Zach is more suited as a 4-3 LB, not a 3-4 ILB. I would say so far they are onto something. Zach is a good player, but I’m not sure he is right for this team and I’m not the only one thinking it. I’m not even saying Carpenter is that guy, but we need to seriously think about drafting a ILB or trading for one in the off season.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Oct 6, 2008 6:42 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not saying Crayton is great
I’m just saying he’s at least average, and that between him, Hurd, Austin, (and even Stanback if one of those 3 gets injured) are good enough to fill in the gaps. Plus I think El Gato will get more pass plays as the season goes on.
In the off season (can we enjoy this season 1st?) I would be shocked if Jerry didn’t make another attempt to grab a guy who could step up at WR to be the #2 and be able to take over when TO leaves. Not disagreeing there. I’m sure he tried to get Williams and Javon Walker, maybe Boldin too this past off season, but it didn’t work out.
As far as the ILB play, I disagree with you. James does what Wade’s defense calls for him to do, take out the blockers on run plays if he can’t get to the ball carrier, and Thomas is supposed to lead the team in tackles from his spot, and I think he’s doing that. The defense is hard to run against. Aside from Portis at the end of the WAS game, they’ve kept teams from using the running game to control the clock. They haven’t blitzed often with BJ, and not often enough with ZT (he can still get it done).
But, I do agree Dallas needs to draft one of these top LB’s coming out in ‘09. Thomas has one or two good years left probably, and if Burnett isn’t re-signed, Dallas will be really thin at that position.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on
Oct 6, 2008 7:29 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We need to draft a big time ILB
is what it comes down to.
While were talking about WRs. I was DEAD WRONG about Deshawn Jackson and what he can do to defenses. He looks like the real deal. I think he was BoyzRback’s boy. He is exactly what we needed here to stretch out the field.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Oct 6, 2008 7:36 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
umm....exactly.....and to think I wanted Felix Jones all along at #22, and would have selected Jackson over Jenkins at #28 in a heartbeat...
but what do i know ?? IF we had indeed selected DeSean Jackson at #28, this offense would had been simply unstoppable….no doubles on TO or Witten, no 8 in the box to shut down the running game………There hasn’t been a receiver with his intangibles, hands, route running abilities, and pure speed since the likes of Terry Glenn, Joey Galloway, or Steve Smith came out of college…..Shame on those who were spitting out the Ted Ginn comparisons….Hopefully next time Jerry Rice touts a player and his skills, these dip sh*t scouts will listen….The dude did run a 4.33 combine….and was far and away the best receiver available…Gotta give the Philly staff credit…they allways do a stellar job scouting…..Next year watch out for LB-Andy Studerbaker on their practice squad…..
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
"If you don’t take him off the field as a coach, he will just about die out there," Jerry Jones said. "That impacted my decision. It’s a Michael Irvin-type work ethic. That’s what we are talking about with Felix Jones."
- Owner/G.M of the Dallas Cowboys , Jerry Jones
by BoyzRback on
Oct 8, 2008 1:18 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jerry did see what the price was for Roy
but it was way to expensive to even think about. They wanted Ware or two 1st round picks. Maybe now that Millen is gone the price will go down, but I’m not sure it’ll be lowered by enough. He’s another butterfingers and isn’t worth what they want for him
by strobman on
Oct 6, 2008 11:34 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, but the difference next year is he will be a UFA
We won’t have to trade for him
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Oct 7, 2008 9:59 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I blame the DL.
There’s no denying that Ratliff is a beast at DT in the nickel, but I don’t know that he’s getting it done in the 3-4. The NT is supposed to demand double teams every single down in a 3-4, or else crush the middle. That’s not happening, allowing guards to get to our LBs, and running backs to be at full speed when they get to the line, which is why we always give up a good 4 every carry. And is Chris Canty in a contract year or what? I don’t think I’ve heard his name all year, same with Spears, Bowen, Hatcher, etc. Tank hadn’t done anything until that forced fumble. If the DEs were doing better, that would help Ware tremendously. But when those guys can be handles one on one by any lineman in the league, we get zero pass rush and zero negative plays. The whole point of the 3-4 is having 2 300 pound DEs and a monster at NT that demand all 5 of your lineman to move or stop. Then you can send in a 4th rusher from any linebacker spot basically untouched by a lineman. If that guy can beat a back or TE, then he will wreak havoc in the backfield. They get most of their sacks and pressures at the end of the game because they go to the 4 man line.
by Baked Potato Soup on
Oct 6, 2008 11:14 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
BP, BP... the glass might actually be half full!
First, this defense is not playing all that poorly. Are we dominating teams? No. But consider the offenses we have come up against; they are some of the better ones in the league. Packers, Cleveland, Cinci, Eagles, Washington … they are all decent teams. And while we have given up some big plays, overall this defense does not look all that bad. Give the guys a chance to correct mistakes. PacMan is rusty, Newman has not been 100%, we have 2 rookies getting their first time… and while I’d like to see more of a pass rush, give a little credit to the Cinci line, McNabb, etc…
We’ll get our sacks, the overall rush will improve… I remain optimistic about this D.
Tar Heels football will surprise this year
by DalaiLuke on
Oct 7, 2008 1:53 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can't remember where,
But after both the Philly game and this game, I gave credit to the defense. I think they are doing better than perceived, but to be dominant, the DL has to play better. I disagree that we have played decent teams though. Other than Washington, who beat us, all of our opponents have losing records. Pacman is our best defensive player right now, in my opinion, so I’m definitely not blaming him. As soon as he holds onto half of the picks that he drops, some QBs and OCs are going to start getting real scared. At least Spears is one of the few that seem mad about how he and the team have played. I think turnovers and special teams have put this D in some bad spots, but I still think the D could play better once in that spot.
I think our secondary is doing okay, and most of their mistakes have been scheme, not personnel. On the DL, though, I think that the players are not getting it done often enough.
by Baked Potato Soup on
Oct 7, 2008 10:54 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
expectations
i guess for me it’s a matter of expectations…. with all the hype i was kind of expecting us to win most every game…. now i knew we would not go undefeated, but i figured we would win most…
and that we would absolutely dominate any inferior opponent…
no bigge, we need to play better and i am sure they know that, we are in the toughest division in football, you could probably combine two division take the top four teams from that combonation and still not be as tough as the NFC East…
we are 4 and 1, with some ‘winable’ games coming up before a rough two weeks of division games on the road…
as long as we get a little better each week…
by stephena on
Oct 6, 2008 12:15 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Romo's quote hit the nail on the head
"you don’t get crowned champions for being the best looking team right now
I disagree with Grizz, the peaking too early theory is not weak at all. Last season the Pats and Cowboys were clearly the best 2 teams in the league from Sept through Nov, but they peaked too early and as a result lost in the end. Indy was by far and away the best team in 2005 throughout the season, only to lose to a red hot Steelers team. The Colts that year peaked too early. The next season, they struggled defensively all season, but peaked late and won it all.
While its true that there is no guarantee if you don’t peak now you will peak later, its also true that if you peak now, you definitely will not later as it’s impossible to peak twice.
All you have to do is look at the last three SB winners to see that the “peak late in the season” theory definitely holds water. Pittsburgh, Indy and GMen all looked like we do now if not worse in the middle of their SB season, but caught fire in December and January.
Bottom line is that if you’re playing your best football now, you won’t be in January if the current trend in today’s NFL holds true. This is something all Cowboys fans should be happy about.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Oct 6, 2008 12:46 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
This teams mental makeup is starting to scare me
Tony only problem coming out of college was his shoot from the hip style which created turnovers and I remember Parcells talking about that while he was the back up QB. It looks like noone is talking to Tony about making smart decisions without effecting his agressiveness. I blame that on coaching……Thank God for the win because I dont like the body language of the team specifically the Offensive superstars ie…TO and Romo during the game. If this team loses a couple of games in a row and TO doesn’t get his touches all hell is going to break lose and I don’t think Wade can control it……Jerry might be able to but then that would make Wade useless in the eyes of the players…..This could get ugly…..as long as the wins keep coming all should be well…..
by jvw on
Oct 6, 2008 1:14 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
we're all conflicted Grizz...
great post. i like that romo is getting kinda edgy. he takes so much crap man. that’s my quarterback. sniff. it’s unfair. sniff……
"They need security in the world, Craig!"
by Tuna Helper on
Oct 6, 2008 2:06 PM CDT
reply
actions
1 recs
Good God
Come on, people.
Yes, Romo fumbled after he ran to get the first down.
He learned and tucked the ball away the next times he ran.
Yes, Romo threw that INT with what appeared to be three Bengals around Witten… and as much as I didn’t like it, that was the only pic the threw in the game.
Our D held on and only allowed FGs — NOT touchdowns.
He’s only been a starter for barely two seasons, and he’s led us to the playoffs twice. Would you rather have that or the three consecutive 5-11 years with the likes of Bledsoe, Testaverde, Carter, Hutchinson, Wright, Leaf?
And didn’t he come through in the clutch — when we needed it most? The media and some of the fans won’t talk about that.
Our last two drives, Romo was MONEY with a CAPITAL BLING!!!
And we got the “W.”
The mediots aren’t harping on that. If it was Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Eli Manning, Ben Roethlisberger, or Donovan McNabb, the common reports would’ve been:
________ shook off a bad game to come through with two game-clinching touchdown drives, leading the _____________ to victory.
But because it’s Tony Romo AND the Dallas Cowboys, you’re NOT gonna hear that.
Why hasn’t anyone talked about that?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
"I'll give anybody a loan here if you bet against the Cowboys." - Jerry Jones, with sarcasm dripping from his voice.
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on
Oct 6, 2008 3:53 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
preach it brother SB!
Romo is always money when we need him, yet fans always want to over look that and just hate, why I’ll never know.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Oct 6, 2008 4:07 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think I have a reason, Ter,
And it has something to do with the taste of victory.
When I lived through the early 90’s, it seemed like the Cowboys team could do nothing wrong. Sure, a win was good, but when they lost, I knew they’d bounce back. The only losses that hurt were the ones in the playoffs.
Then, the Switzer years, followed by a period of time I have chosen to forget. When the Tuna came, he got the Boys turned around, but couldn’t get it done in the post-season.
Now, every time we win, true fans are reliving the good ‘ol days, but when the Boys lose, there has to be a reason. It can’t be b/c we are looking back at the past with rose-colored glasses, NO! It has to be that Romo < Aikman, TO < Irvin, etc etc. Our memories can’t be wrong, it must be the team that is failing us. If only WE were the coaches.
How Bout Them Cowboys!
by sprprsnmn on
Oct 6, 2008 4:58 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
to compare this team to the greatest dynasty of all time
is so unfair and any Cowboys fans doing it should be ashamed of themselves.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Oct 6, 2008 6:44 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1 SB
Man, it is bad enough with the all the analyst and reporters who hate us.. Now are own fans are turning against a player who ranks 10th Completion %, 5th Qb rating, 3rd in yards, 2nd in TD’s. I was concerned during the game, but after taking a step back, and watching other QB’s operate- I am ecstatic to have Romo..
I think Tom Brady’s season last year threw off expectations..
"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"
by Wmillion on
Oct 6, 2008 4:58 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I just want them to get mad.
I don’t care if they play poorly and win, but I don’t want them to act like that’s good enough. I realize they are going to lose, but I expect them to be mad as hell when they do. I just want to see this team fired up and fighting mad at some point soon, because they haven’t been so far. Maybe it’s the hangover from last season and the realization that it doesn’t matter what they do in the regular season anymore, so they aren’t going all out right now.
by Baked Potato Soup on
Oct 6, 2008 11:19 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
that may be too close to the truth to admit!
the realization that it doesn’t matter what they do in the regular season anymore, so they aren’t going all out right now.
Tar Heels football will surprise this year
by DalaiLuke on
Oct 7, 2008 1:56 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah
The more I think about it, the more I really think that that’s what it is.
by Baked Potato Soup on
Oct 7, 2008 10:56 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
dallas vs cincinati
Why is it that when the Giants have to take the Bengals to overtime to beat them,
there the best team in the nfl(as iluded to by nfl network last week) . But dallas beats
them by 9 in regulation everone starts taking shots at the defense. You cant expect
our rookies to come in and play like “pro bowlers”. Hey, they may get there, but don’t
expect it this year. Remember with the number of rookies making contributions,
You’ve got to consider the secondary a work inprogress.DON"T WORR,THEY WILL
FIND THERE GROOVE (maybe right about the time the giants did last year . would’nt
that be nice ! ! !)
by Dallas cowboy family 08 on
Oct 8, 2008 7:37 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs












