Fixing the Cowboys Part II: The defense
Earlier this week, I gave my suggestions for fixing the Dallas Cowboys offense. Now, I turn my attentions to the defense.
- Get the rat out of the maze - I've been saying it since training camp and I'll keep saying it although it's obvious it's not going to happen - Jay Ratliff can do a lot more damage from the defensive end position. He's undersized for the middle and teams are recognizing that if you double-team him, you can get him moved and they are taking advantage. Yeah, he might get double-teamed some out at end but at least he'd have more space to work in. But, on the other hand, if you got him on the same side as DeMarcus Ware, you'd have a hard time putting two guys on each of them. Marcus Spears should move inside and rotate with Tank Johnson. It's not about lack of sacks with Spears, it's about lack of penetration and not disrupting plays in the backfield. The guy just doesn't have what it takes to get it done and The Rat does, but he needs to be freed from that maze in the middle where there's too much traffic.
- Giving up points in bunches - Whatever else we do on defense one thing is a priority; learn to cover the bunch formation. The Bengals abused us with it and the Giants did, too. If I was an offensive coordinator facing the Cowboys, 75% of my pass plays would originate from the bunch formation. The Cowboys have been using a zone-coverage to try and combat the formation but every week it's the same confusion. Guys pass off a receiver but the other guy doesn't take him, or someone sits in between two receivers but doesn't cover either, or two guys go to one area and leave another zone uncovered. It's chaos. Please Wade, Stewie and Campo, figure this out! Play straight-up man if you have to whenever you see the bunch formation but something has to be done. The Giants scored two very easy TD's out of the formation, following a pattern that's been going on all year.
- Youth is served - Anthony Spencer is playing much better than Greg Ellis. So play him, like, a lot! I don't care how much Greg Ellis whines about the situation, we need production and Spencer is producing. Ellis is the past, Spencer is the future. When those two meet in the present, go with the future.
- Please, just please - Please, allow the secondary to attack the receivers instead of waiting for the receivers to catch 8-yard passes then tackling them. If this means less Anthony Henry because he can't play that style, then so be it. Jenkins, Scandrick and Newman all have the ability to run with receivers so they can take more chances. Jenkins especially showed in training camp that he's better pressing receivers at the line than he is playing off. This secondary needs to get aggressive and quit letting offenses dictate the style of play.
- Shop at the Gap - We need to be more aggressive in the secondary, but one thing the run defense needs to understand is that gap responsibility is paramount. Over the last few weeks the defense has been over-pursuing and getting caught out of position leading to some long runs. Whether its guys running too fast to the point of attack and not being in control for the cutback or guys pushing in along the line and leaving the outside uncovered; we've been opening 4-lane highways for the opposition. If guys would just do their jobs instead of trying to be the hero, this defense would be a much better unit.
- Off-tackle - What's up with our lousy tackling skills? I don't know how to fix it but I know it's a problem. I'm just saying.
That's the best I got. It really comes down to the players doing a better job. And no, I didn't consider suggesting a move to a 4-3 defense for two reasons. One, doing it mid-season is never going to happen and for good reason. Second, I don't agree that our personnel fit better in a 4-3, in fact I think it would under-utilize some of our best defensive players.
Feel free to comment below or add your own suggestions.
0 recs |
35 comments
|
Comments
This is excellent stuff
that you can only get at BTB. I second all of the above and add for your consideration –
7. Under Pressure – Stop going conservative on the pass rush on third and long. Bring more guys than they can block and let the secondary lock up on the WRs. Sure they’ll give up an occasional play but more often than not they’ll get a turnover or that rarest of rare three and out.
8. Who are You? - establish a real defensive identity – a hard hitting, fly to the ball mentality. Play with some anger. It’s what the best teams have on defense and come December (assuming that month is relevant to us) the team is going to need it.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 10, 2008 6:00 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Henry (especially) should bump
I don’t understand people saying Henry needs to play 12 yards off because he doesn’t have the speed to bump and run. I think he should bump and run specifically because he can’t run fast.
1. Defenders have figured out that while they can’t normally run with T.O., it becomes easy once they rough him up at the line.
2. Put yourself in Henry’s shoes 10 yards off the receiver. You have to worry about quick slants or outs so you wait on the receiver to get to you. Then, if he runs a go, you have to accellerate to catch up with a guy who is already running full speed.
3. Henry is a big, physical corner (like the guys in GB who aren’t superfast either). He is perfect for holding receivers up at the line.
by JimmyJohnson on Nov 10, 2008 6:29 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
A+++
Exactly, Henry needs to play at the line and jam the wideouts. He’s one of the more physical CB’s in the league and also one of the slowest. He should never be giving up 10 yards of cushion to anyone.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Nov 10, 2008 8:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The reason they are cautious about Henry jamming at the line
is becasue if he misses, he’s toast. He has no recovery speed. So they would have to play a safety over the top on his side to guard against that. It’s the same thing as the way teams play T.O., press him at the line and keep a safety over the top. The problem with Henry is that even an average WR with good speed could beat him badly if he the jam at the line doesn’t work. I think they’re trying to keep from having to put a safety to his side all the time. The other CB’s we have possess good recovery speed so it’s less of a gamble.
by Dave Halprin on Nov 10, 2008 8:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point Grizz
But I’d still rather see him do a lot more jams at the LOS, especially if the defensive pressure is stepped up by the front 7. I think he’s better at jamming, than he is at playing with a big cushion (which negates any pressure since it’s an easy bailout to dump the pass off to his WR.)
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Nov 11, 2008 12:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree on the personnel.
They don’t have the true 3-4 NT that is needed and it shows….BIG TIME.
by fivetwos on Nov 10, 2008 6:37 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
the boys at DC.com disagree with you Grizz
regarding Spears.
ROBERT FERGUSON, SACHSE, TX: It sounds like Spencer will be taking significant snaps from Ellis. I know he doesn’t fit the traditional mold of a DE in a 3-4 scheme, but can we at least try Ellis at DE? I mean we are getting nothing from Spears. Your thoughts?
Mickey: My thoughts are you haven’t been watching Marcus Spears this season. He’s playing really well. For a guy who is not used on the nickel, he’s seventh on the team with 40 tackles and is tied for the team lead with three tackles for a loss and leads all the defensive linemen with four passes defensed. Greg Ellis is not a defensive end in a 3-4 defense. Those guys are run stoppers first and foremost, and need to be 300pounders, not 260. Ellis would get blown off the line of scrimmage playing inside like that. Crazy idea.
Nick: : That’s a tough one because Ellis has completely transformed his body to being a 3-4 linebacker. So to tell him to go inside as the 4-3 end, is quite a stretch. Those guys are forced to take on double-teams for most of the game. And you say nothing from Spears, but I think he’s providing a little more than Canty is right now. Those two players, rarely garner a lot of stats. I just don’t think that’s the right spot for Ellis. I think there is a way to get everyone on the field. Wade has been quoted as saying “you can’t ever have enough pass-rushers.” So maybe, it’s time he can prove that.
Josh: First of all I disagree that you’re getting nothing from Spears. I think he’s been the Cowboys best defensive lineman aside from Jay Ratliff. Now, playing Ellis at end is something you could have considered before the season, and maybe ask him to put on weight and change his body for. Now that he’s slimmed to linebacker size, though, there’s no way he can hold up against the run with offensive linemen double-teaming him.
Rob: The reason Ellis (6-6, 262)moved to linebacker in the first place was because he’s not big enough for end in this scheme. 3-4 ends need to be around 300 pounds to survive against the run, which is a very underrated part of Spears’ game. Don’t just look at sacks when evaluating his play.
http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/news.cfm?id=77FE7E9B-D2AC-F82B-C861BC6C2D332B5B&contentType=5
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 10, 2008 7:15 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think Grizz's problem with him is that he doesn't disrupt the backfield enough
Being a run stopper is not enough. I expect to see more in the passing game.
I personally think we would be better off switching Spears and Ratliff. Spears is slightly bigger and we even played Spears at NT quite a bit in training camp, so it wouldn’t be totally new to him. And Ratliff would be more disruptive at the DE position.
by quincyyyyy on Nov 10, 2008 9:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think there's any chance
Wade switches these player’s positions in mid season, won’t happen. If we see Rat at DE, it will be next year.
That being said, I agree we need a bigger wide body at NT and Rat at DE where IMO, he’d be an all-pro.
Just won’t happen this year.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 10, 2008 9:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Like I said we played him at NT quite a bit in TC
Of course we would ease him in game by game, but I think that would be the best option for our d-line.
by quincyyyyy on Nov 10, 2008 9:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree but we all know
Wade is very opposed to change.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 10, 2008 10:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well Wade may not have a job very much longer
so he should change his stance on change
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on Nov 10, 2008 10:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I usually agree with some of these guys, but they need new glasses
Spears made some plays the first few games of the season, but has done nothing since. Spears being the best DL right now is not saying much because they all have been bad. That said, Spears is not playing better than Canty….
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on Nov 10, 2008 10:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Mickey is always full of crap.
Spears has 22 tackles, not 40, and is tied for 11th on the team, not 7th. He’s always spewing numbers, but most are inaccurate, and he never gives corresponding data to put them in perspective.
I definitely agree that Ellis would be a disaster at end in the 3-4, but Spears is mediocre at best. The upgrade from moving Ratliff to his DE spot is greater than the downgrade of whomever moves into the NT spot.
Of course, a real 3-4 NT would solve most of this team’s defensive problems. Since Rat is not that guy, put him where he is best. We have to get the best players at their best positions. Aces in their places.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 10, 2008 11:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It seems NT has been a position of need for the past couple of seasons
but Jerry has yet to address it. I am actually a fan of his GM work, unlike most fans, but this problem is squarely on him.
by quincyyyyy on Nov 10, 2008 11:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In the 2008 off season...
NT, OLB, ILB, O-line, and backup QB have to be priorities.
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on Nov 10, 2008 11:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
whoops. i meant in the 2009 off season. my bust. sorry.
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on Nov 10, 2008 11:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They should have never let Ferguson and Fasano go.
I still don’t understand the logic of that move, especially with what we got for them. I think Bennett can be a great weapon, but he is not going to take Witten’s spot, so I doubt he ever really gets used. If you are going to just have a backup, stick with the one you’ve got. Ferguson in the middle and Ratliff at the end would solve so many problems for this D, and you could rotate Spears and Canty at the other spot. Ferguson could rest in the nickel, and Tank and Ratliff could be DT in those situations. I’m not quite ready to say we’re done for the year, but this team must have a legitimate 3-4 NT to have a truly dominant defense.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 10, 2008 11:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That was definitely a dumb move
Jerry must be kicking himself for that.
by quincyyyyy on Nov 10, 2008 12:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cowboys run a 2 TE set a lot
so a second TE is a necessity which is why Fasano was let go, he just wasn’t that good.
I agree with Fergy though, we certainly miss his presense in the middle.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 10, 2008 12:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
co-sign
i can’t understand why Wade doesn’t try Spears at the Nose, Canty & Rat at ends, with D-Ware & Spencer @OLB and Bradie & Zach @ ILBs.
Rat would be able to wreak more havoc at DE and add another pressure player on passing downs.
You’re dead on when you said…
We have to get the best players at their best positions. Aces in their places.
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on Nov 10, 2008 11:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Totally in agreement with you SB
That would be the best line-up to create havoc and still protect against the run.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Nov 10, 2008 8:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
DC.com Pumps Sunshine Like Jerry Jones
Because he signs their paychecks. Marcus Spears is a bust, pure and simple. Good to hear he’s had 40 tackles and managed to get behind the line for a tackle THREE WHOLE TIMES. Is this his contract season? If so you’ll never see him get this good again, and that’s a sad statement.
by GhostofGaryHogeboom on Nov 10, 2008 2:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not but let's hope this is his last
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on Nov 10, 2008 6:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He's only had 22 tackles.
He’s had 14 solo and 8 assists, which makes 22. That’s the numbers on NFL.com, which is accessed by clicking on the Statistics link on DallasCowboys.com. Mickey just makes stats up when he needs to support his arguments. Spears is actually tied for 11th on the team, with Ellis and Canty.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 10, 2008 9:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This is some excellent analysis here
And nicely summarizes a lot of what I’ve been screaming at my television since the beginning of the Wade Phillips era, (especially what you’re saying about the coverage). I’ve been screaming for press coverage for 2 years now.
It’s just another example of how terrible this coaching staff really is. I have felt all season long that Cowboys have the players of 14-2 team w/ the coaching staff of a 2-14 team. This staff, over the past two years has shown zero ability to adjust, especially on defense.
by gee-roj on Nov 10, 2008 7:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Again, Grizz is right on the money
But here’s the thing: This, and by this I mean discerning problems and fixing them ASAP, is not how we operate in Dallas.
Instead, we let things simmer until it’s painfully, unavoidably obvious that something must be done, then we wait some more, and then we get to it. See: MBIII and JuJo.
Or, we talk about the issue, wait till training camp, show tantalizing hints of what is possible and then completely ignore or forget the solution by the time the new season rolls around. See: Rat at DE.
by accidental innuendo on Nov 10, 2008 8:38 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Isn't that the damnedest thing
Also, of all the suggestions my priorities would be
- More press coverage
- Start Spencer
- Rat to the outside
If Spears has been as good as some people think at DE (Mickey and co.), then perhaps he’d be even better at NT. After all, he is bigger than Rat and Tank, and could potentially be the best of the bunch at holding his ground there in the middle. While I don’t think we’d see an enormous difference in production from Rat at DE, I do think he’d be better overall. Even if it’s a slight upgrade it’s well worth doing IMO. Every inch counts in this game and it’s time the coaches start taking every inch every time one’s available.
by sublimezg on Nov 10, 2008 9:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree with you that we don't have the personnel to play in a 4-3
In fact Carp, Tank, Thomas, and Burnett would do much better in a 4-3 IMO. We may need an offseason to pick up a couple of guys to fit our scheme, but I think with players we have a 4-3 would be a better fit for us IMO.
by quincyyyyy on Nov 10, 2008 9:26 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Dead on....
Jay Ratliff can do a lot more damage from the defensive end position. He’s undersized for the middle and teams are recognizing that if you double-team him
I’ve been saying this since the start of the season. He makes plays, but he is too inconsistant to be a good NT.
Marcus Spears should move inside and rotate with Tank Johnson. It’s not about lack of sacks with Spears, it’s about lack of penetration and not disrupting plays in the backfield. The guy just doesn’t have what it takes to get it done
I can’t agree more with this quote. I’ve been on the Spears hater train for some time going back to last season when I thought Hatcher should replace him. I also wasn’t fooled in preseason like many were with his good play against 2nd, 3rd and 4th stringers. I knew he would revert back to the same mediocre DE we have seen the past 3 seasons. I’m all for giving him a shot at NT, but I think he could be cut in the offseason.
Anthony Spencer is playing much better than Greg Ellis. So play him, like, a lot! I don’t care how much Greg Ellis whines about the situation, we need production and Spencer is producing. Ellis is the past, Spencer is the future. When those two meet in the present, go with the future.
I believe this would’ve happened alot sooner if not for Spencer getting injured. This is the last year of Ellis no doubt about it. Jerry would be better served going out and drafting a OLB to back up Spencer or sign a FA in the offseason.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on Nov 10, 2008 10:06 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
i certainly agree with no. 4...
they also need to blitz better. we really need to take advantage of matchups. overload one side. force a lineman to choose who to block. attack the tight end. bring more DBs off the corner. what, exactly, do we have to lose?
good stuff tho. never thought about moving around Rat. but it makes sense.
"They need security in the world, Craig!"
by Tuna Helper on Nov 10, 2008 12:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Really?
never thought about moving around Rat.
I think about that every day (yes I know I’m a little obssessed). Hopefully Wade thinks about it as well.
by quincyyyyy on Nov 10, 2008 1:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Fixing The Tackling Problem
Practice like you play. I saw Hard Knocks and saw Barbie Carpenter and his golden blonde locks fly into kick return wedges, but I also saw a camp that was pretty soft by comparison to others. The ultimate team coach has let his team become soft, undisciplined and with no accountability (which starts with the GM).
Let’s turn this thing around. We have more on-paper talent than any team in the NFL. It’s time we start playing like it.
by GhostofGaryHogeboom on Nov 10, 2008 2:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Not to say that this team is not soft
but what other team training camps did you see that showed enough access to make that determination. I am not disagreeing with you statement but I would like to know what teams you are referring to.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Nov 10, 2008 3:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
not to steal Ghost's thunder
but I’ve been to a few of the Steelers camps and they’re in full pads almost every practice and have specific drills for tackling and hitting. Very physical camp I thought and they play that way on Sundays.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 10, 2008 3:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















