Wade Phillips press conference 10/13/08
Summary of Wade Phillips' press conference today.
Bobby Carpenter still has a groin strain and didn't practice. Felix Jones didn't practice. Isaiah Stanback popped out his shoulder so were waiting to see on him...
(Lost the feed here, when the feed came back I thought he was talking about Stanback's shoulder) If it calms down again it will be fine, don't know about the long-term for surgery.
Brad Johnson will hold for us, we have the most confidence in him. He'll have to be the #2 QB or we'll need to keep three QB's active. Mat McBriar could have done it but we lost him as the backup holder. We're leaning towards two QB's active. With Carpenter looking like he may be down, special teams is a concern first, having enough people is a concern.
(Receivers and corners were going against each individually before practice in press coverage drills?) We've seen a lot of press coverage the last four or five games, we try to work on it, we've been doing that drill in practice. Also, teams we play who play press coverage we do the drill in practice for the offense and it helps our defensive players too, working on their press technique.
Terence Newman seems fine, he looks to be back, he has a purpose and that is to play well this game, he feels comfortable. It gives us an opportunity to do some things we weren't doing before on defense.
The pass rush is good, we got a good rush team. I thought the last couple of games they've been very good. Against Tampa Bay we got to him a couple of times and got some pressure. Eli Manning had only been sacked six times before we played them and we sacked him four times and put pressure on him. We're getting stronger in that area. That's something we wanted to establish, that's needed for good pass defense and just good defense.
(John Madden said that besides Ware and Ratliff nobody else gets a pass rush on this team?) I don't know what he said but if we're not as good as the numbers show I don't know what can be said. We were fourth in the league last year and we're up there again in sacks and we play in a division were there aren't a lot of sacks on QB's. We have some good individual rushers and we try to put them in good situations. The numbers are there.
Anthony Spencer has developed on the line of scrimmage as a run player, he's hard to block, he's learned the techniques we wanted and does them efficiently. He has a quick start from the 2-point stance and is very athletic. He has caught on to playing all out on every play, sometimes it takes young guys longer to figure that out. He came on in training camp and he's played like that. We brought him back one game for six plays and he made three tackles before he got hurt again. He will be a good player for us. His transition from defensive end in college to OLB is complete, in my experience he's made that transition. We may spell Ware some with him and keep Ellis in the game some. It just depends on DeMarcus. He's had sacks at the end of games that have been important, so he can give it all out the whole game. But if he needs a break we can do it now.
I don't really know what impact DeAngelo Hall will have this week, it just depends. It's kind of like us getting Pacman and it was hard to do a lot with him then, just tell him to go cover this guy. Talent-wise he's talented. It will be interesting to see how much he plays.
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
hmmmm...
still queasy about keeping three QBs active….but I guess I’m not going to raise hell about it until something happens. hopefully it won’t….
"They need security in the world, Craig!"
I see Shawn Springs didn’t practice again today. The more responsibilities DeAngelolife has the better. He’s toast in man coverage; especially against Roy or T.O. I would only be weary of him if he was on the field as a nickelback or even 4th CB and was allowed to freelance and possibly jump a route or two which could be disastrous for a rusty Romo.
Anthony Spencer
What will it take for him to lineup opposite Ware all the time? What is the coaching staff’s fascination with Ellis? He made a few pro bowls back in his prime? He is old, over the hill, and he should definitely should be replaced by Spencer, let the better man win the job.
co-sign on that
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
Ellis' first Pro Bowl was last year
Spencer is good but he’s not yet Ellis. I like the fact that we have 3 pass rushers in Ware, Ellis and Spencer. Lets see if the coaches can get them all in the game at the same time to confuse the offense. No need to knock Ellis to promote Spencer. Ellis is a long-time top contributor and still is.
by Kansas Cowboy on Nov 13, 2008 7:12 PM CST up reply actions
I disagree
I don’t think Ellis is Ellis from last year.. He blew his wad last year. He can’t consistently beat one one blocking.
"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"
I think its good to rotate all of them (Ellis ,Ware ,Spencer)
Not only to give different looks but to rest our best defensive player every once in a while. You thought our d sucked w/o newman imagine without Ware.
I understand what you're saying
I just meant Spencer and Ware should be the full time starters. Rotate who you will to rest players, that is fine. Even if Ellis is a different look to an offense, I don’t think he is as good as Spencer.
More Spencer, less Ellis in the rotation
I’m a fan of Ellis’ (except for the annual off season whining) but he’s either not being used the right way or he’s starting to decline. All I know is I’ve seen Spencer cause more disruption than Greg so far this season, and he’s missed a few games.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Nov 13, 2008 9:15 PM CST up reply actions
Heck
Line them up the the SAME side. RDE, ROLB
yeah. they should give da Skins O a lot of new looks on Defense
creative chaos to confuse Campbell.
don’t make it so easy for Washington to read.
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
Emergency QB
What’s the rule with regard to the emergency QB? I know that if the QB1 and the QB2 both get hurt, the QB3 can play even if he’s not on the 45-man active roster, but what’s the definition of “hurt”? ;)
I saw we make Brad the #2 and leave Bollinger inactive. If God forbid Romo has to leave the game, Brad “pulls” a hammy on the very first snap he takes. Presto-change-o, Bollinger is in. Of course, that leaves us without a holder, I guess… which is the problem we’re trying to deal with.
My understanding
is that if the #3 plays a single snap the #1 & #2 cannot go back into the game. I don’t think anything prevents Bollinger coming in immediately without explanation if Romo goes down. However, as you stated, then Johnson cannot re-enter the game and therefore we rely on a 2nd holder (Crayton or Palescua). The challenge would be if something then happened to Bollinger. In that case, I’m not sure if the rules allow Johnson to re-enter or if you have to go to Crayton. Not likely but 2 QB injuries in one game has happened before.
by Kansas Cowboy on Nov 13, 2008 7:15 PM CST up reply actions
the holder issue
i suppose the beneift there is that with Long-Tooth Johnson or Brooks Bollinger in at QB, we really don’t need a holder.
by bulldog jeeper on Nov 14, 2008 4:51 AM CST up reply actions
Stanback
For crying outloud, just have the surgery and get it over with. The shoulder will never be the same until you get the surgery and this type of thing will just keep happening over and over again.
Cowboys fan since 1978.. I was 3 years old
I agree,
I mean, what’s the point? He’s generally inactive anyway, just get yourself right as quickly as possible so that you don’t miss any offseason work.
"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee (I know he wasn't a Cowboy, but that's gotta be my favorite football quote)
He will lose ROM in the shoulder
After the surgery but the stability will be almost 100%
Cowboys fan since 1978.. I was 3 years old
so what?
Who cares how many sacks they’re getting? Are they generating turnovers? Are they forcing QB pressure/sacks on critical 3rd downs? Do they stop drives? Do they force oppositional gameplanning? Are they generating Wins?
Um… no to all that? OK, let’s discuss why the pass coverage sucks and ditto the run D. To discuss the numerical total of sacks by the D is to obfuscate and cherry pick data.
it depends on the game
against the Bucs, a decent offense, the answer was yes to all of the above except the turnovers (the one we got was on ST). The Bucs 3rd down efficiency was 6/17 or 35%. Held them out of the end zone on all three times in the red zone. They got only two sacks against Garcia’s quick release, but got 12 QB hits and through the pressure forced a number of incomplete passes. And that win was directly attributable to the defense, along with BJ not making any mistakes.
so all I’m saying is they are capable but inconsistent. I will take inconsistent over consistently bad, but of course we’d all prefer consistently good. But that game showed that they can do it, if only they would do it consistently.
Regurgitation
Now that bloggers are in the paraphrasing business… according to the Montecito Journal, Tex was seen out on the town with with cougar magnet Fred Couples, dining at Lucky’s, a sophisticated steakhouse owned by Gene Montesano, who is renowned for co-creating vintage-inspired Lucky Brand Jeans.
Huh?
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
so what
Joey2zs,
Spot on. Show me the stat that indicates getting the offense off the field on 3rd down when it counts allowing the offense to get on the field. I don’t want to hear about 4 sacks a game when the defense couldn’t get the stops on third when they needed it. I beleive Wade gets to caught up on stats to justify his teams poor play. That trickle down mentality doesn’t encourage accountability.
so what?
Hmm, if the defense didn’t have to be on the field for what, 40+ minutes per game they might perform somewhat better. Our offense has been our defensive problem.
Offense does affect Defensive performance
I don’t recall exactly which year it was but in one of the 90’s Superbowl years, Emmit held out the first 2 weeks of the season. The defense was gouged those 2 weeks. When he returned and suddenly the Offense had rhythm and moved the ball the defense improved. Why? The defense was rested and they faced fewer opponent’s drives. In that case it was an RB that enabled the Offense to perform. This year its actually an OL; Kosier who will make that difference. In the Green Bay game, Kosier’s only game this season, the Boys controlled the clock. Look for that to come back to form Sunday night. Romo’s return helps too because he’ll help the running game by forcing no more than 7 in the box with the threat of a pass down the field to TO, Williams or Witten.
Precisely
I’ve got a post publishing a little later about that.
Stop the Madness - Enshrine Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
by Raul Villaronga on Nov 13, 2008 8:55 PM CST up reply actions
Must win Game
I see the Boys making the playoffs, but all the scenarios in my head start with kicking the sh*t out of the Redskins! If they lose this one, I can’t convince myself that they will over come this lose. I certainly see us winning and building off this win. Can’t wait!
Way too many muscles
pulls and strains. Not enough running in the summer is my guess. I think its time for the Stanbach experiment to end…..He has so much talent but cant stay on the field its time. I say we go on fourth down on anything less than 6yds if we are in FG range and Forgett the the holder. This is a big game for us time to put as many points on the board as possible. We need to play this game as if our season depends on it…….because it does

by 


















