Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Wade Phillips Bears Down

Early in the game, with Washington facing a 1st and 10 at the Dallas 20, Wade Phillips called a special package, in an attempt to break the Redskins' rhythm.  After lining up in their base 3-4, DEs Marcus Spears and Chris Canty slid inside, facing up to the Washington guards.  At the same time, Bradie James walked from his inside linebacker position to a spot on the line of scrimmage inside of SOLB Greg Ellis

In an instant, the Cowboys had moved from their "Phillips 3-4," with speed and gap control, into Buddy Ryan's old "46" scheme, which terrorized defenses in the mid '80s and early '90s.  Ryan called it for the '85 Bears, who are considered one of the best defense ever.  He built another fearsome version in Philadelphia, with Reggie White anchoring a stellar unit.

 

Star-divide

Phillips needed a schematic adjustment to help his run defense, which had been ripped by Clinton Portis, Stephen Jackson and the Giants runners in the last six weeks.

Phillips learned the scheme first hand.  He was Ryan's defensive coordinator from '86 through '88. The scheme creates mismatches along the line of scrimmage.  It's core concept is to take your best pass rusher and put him between the tackles in a 4-3 line, putting three defensive linemen over the three interior offensive linemen. 

The smallest and weakest pass blocker on a line is usually a center and the 46 matches him up against your best rusher without help;  with the guards covered they can't slide inside.  Your star then has the most direct path to the QB. End Dan Hampton thrived in this scheme at Chicago and White tore up pass pockets for the Eagles.

To replace the DE who has moved inside, Ryan moved both his outside linebackers to the strong side, placing one on each side of the tight end.  He then rushed both of them frequently.  The overload compromises a team's passing options.  Teams can use their tight end to block one linebacker and their strong side OT to block the other.  If the tight end goes out on a pattern, however, the running back has to cover the rusher, meaning that the left tackle has not help.

This is the other key rusher in the 46 front.  Richard Dent played this spot for the Bears and Clyde Simmons made several Pro Bowls for the Eagles in this role. 

When Dallas make the adjustments it placed its best rushers in one-on-one match-ups.  Ratliff got to rush against Casey Raback and Demarcus Ware went solo against Chris Samuels.  The only difference is cosmetic:  Dent and Simmons played with their hands down, while Ware plays in a two-point stance. 

The scheme paid immediate dividends.  Ratliff wasted Raback the first time the scheme was called and sacked Jason Campbell for an eight yard loss. Campbell was rushed into incompletions another couple of times.  Washington beat it only once, when Zorn called for an eight-man, max-protection scheme in the 3rd quarter and sent out just two receivers in a post/deep in combination.  Antwaan Randle El beat a gimpy Anthony Henry for 23 yards on the play, but in every other instance the matchups favored Dallas.

The last key personnel switch came at middle linebacker.  The scheme calls for an all-purpose pivotman, who can chase down running plays, drop into the deep middle on zone calls and turn and track tight ends when the secondary plays man-to-man.  Dallas used Kevin Burnett in Zach Thomas' place, because he's the team's best coverage 'backer.  He blanketed Chris Cooley.  The tight end caught several passes, but they were against other packages and were for very short gains.

Burnett lists at 232 lbs. which is light for a 3-4, especially one that lacks a massive nose tackle.  (Ratliff and Tank Johnson list at 290 and 305 respectively.)  With three linemen covering him, his weight is not an issue.  Burnett is free to chase running plays wherever they go.

The 46 was a simple changeup last night.  I counted eight plays where Dallas used it.  Because it worked so effectively, I think we'll see it more in the weeks to come.

 

Tomorrow:  How Terence Newman improved the Cowboys' run defense.

 

2 recs  |  Comment 49 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

If the Cowboys D

can play the 46 defense only half as good as the ‘85 Bears, we’re going to the SB, no doubt.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 17, 2008 7:53 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I love the analysis. Raf you're awesome!

Wow, I love Mike Singletary. If I was rich I'd pay him to follow me around and coach my life. "Get that report done! I won't tolerate slacking!!!", "Do you think the lawn is gong to mow itself? Get out there! GO! GO! GO!"

That would kick ass. - quote from the Internets.

by BLUE_Thru-n-Thru on Nov 18, 2008 2:23 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Geez

what’s wrong with Braylon freaking Edwards. Catch the effing ball!

Jindal '12

by Longhorn on Nov 17, 2008 7:54 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Wow

ESPN’s broadcast sucks…bad everything, bad audio, horrible HD video…pathetic.

Jindal '12

by Longhorn on Nov 17, 2008 7:57 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, they're horrible.

I kept watching for them to replay some plays, like every other broadcast does, and they’d almost never do it. There were several incompletions by Quinn and I kept waiting for them to reshow them ‘cause they looked like good passes that hit Winslow and Edwards in the hands and they never showed them again. It was like a high school broadcast. They’re more interested in turning MNF into ET.

by kameleon_o on Nov 18, 2008 4:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Great write-up Raf

I noticed last night that the man to man coverage was called more than normal.. I think that is when our defense will play their best, and with Newman back, we can trust our defense to get after the QB with less fear because of Newman’s presence in the secondary. I just feel zone isn’t our strong suit.

I wish we could play a formation that got our best 11 on the field in our base package. I feel like Keith Davis being on the field for all of our base packages is such a liability, and I know we can’t just move Henry to safety right now… Do you think Wade is realizing this, and is moving towards the 4-6 because of KD? When you look across the board in that formation compared to our normal 3-4… isn’t the only difference Tank rotates in and Davis rotates out, while Burnett rotates in and Zach Thomas goes out??

by commoncents on Nov 17, 2008 8:06 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Is Keith Davis really that much of a liability?

I thought he had an ok game. I’ve felt for a couple of years he would be better than RW.

by staubachfan on Nov 17, 2008 9:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Same Here...

He has played real well, especially against the run during his time starting as SS.

~Texas Massacre 08~

by TheHeat on Nov 17, 2008 9:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought the same.

I’ve always been a big critic of Davis’ but he’s played well lately. Not the liability RW was and not nearly as bad as I was expecting him to be. He’s been solid.

by kameleon_o on Nov 18, 2008 4:17 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait

for a game with a better/more experienced QB than we’ve seen lately in TB, Skins-given a little time (which Campbell didn’t have much of) they will find Davis out there and exploit him.
That said, he’s held his own by being invisible lately! That’s all I ask of him-don’t make me know you’re in the game!

by Realist Larry on Nov 18, 2008 12:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

True

But one thing that did improve last Sunday night, was that our D put continual pressure on Jason Campbell… and I’m glad they practiced & planned & prepared to do that because he & Santana Moss usually plays well against us.

However, that was when we played that crap zone. Hopefully that’ll be scrapped from here on out.

"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson

www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]

by silverblue5 on Nov 18, 2008 9:17 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Davis is out performing his reputation

Last year, his individual stats were among the worse in the NFL. He has always been a good special teams player but he has been a liability without equal in coverage. Williams was bad, but KD was even worse by a yard or three per attempt. He was cut by a team that was 1-5 last year because they felt their undrafted rookies were better.

This year, especially in the last 3 games he has out performed his past and his reputation. The fear is that he did not suddenly gain a better understanding of pass coverage, but that he is being protected and that sooner or later a offensive coordiator is going to figure out how to get him in match ups that will give up big plays.

I do not know if that will happen, but KD is by far the biggest weakpoint in what otherwsie looks to be a strong coverage unit.

by Trey, on Nov 17, 2008 10:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's all true but

his horrible stats were also put up while playing the FS position. He’s a true SS and is getting to play it. Which he could never do with RW here. I obviously would like an upgrade there but I’ll give the devil his due he’s not playing bad right now.

by kameleon_o on Nov 18, 2008 4:19 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good X's & O's....keep it coming (where's the tip jar?)

It’s great to be able to read about the “hows” of a win (or loss) throughout the week and then watch the game again later in the week.

Sounds like one of the keys was us shifting to the 46 as opposed to lining up in the 46 right out of the huddle. I also like that we ran it with our 3-4 personnel as opposed to bringing in the extra D linemen.

Looking forward to the next write up.

by NateMac on Nov 17, 2008 8:12 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Get used to it

Raf’s gotta be one of the best around at it. Certainly that I’ve seen.

by mdlusk on Nov 18, 2008 12:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Glad to see

the coaches making the necessary adjustments, and copying the ’85 Bears is as good as D gets.

Great stuff, Raf. More, please.

Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.

by OskieOskie on Nov 17, 2008 8:16 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

but let’s sneak in tonight and steal from RedBall-I want to take away his double reverses and the lame WR screen to TO (Uh, they’re pressing him, isn’t that his problem right now? Call it when/if they ever back off 8 yards again)!

by Realist Larry on Nov 18, 2008 1:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

How did I miss the 46?

I wish I had the tape. I never saw it.

by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Nov 17, 2008 9:14 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

So, Let Me Get This Right...

They aren’t “intelligent” enough so Wade had to simplify the defense a few weeks back, but yet they played the 46 real well?

I do hope Wade has more packages this team can employ during the second half of the season, we will need them -especially in December.

~Texas Massacre 08~

by TheHeat on Nov 17, 2008 9:19 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Great write-up.

So if we are going to be employing this more in the coming week, how do teams beat it and how does our opponent’s personnel match up with that gameplan?

by Parl on Nov 17, 2008 9:21 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

They beat it the way the Redskins did on the play he mentioned.

The way to hurt the 46 is to go max protect and beat their corners. Basically, you have to be able to hold up or cover their receivers long enough to allow your pass rush to get to them. That’s how the Dolphins smoked the Bears in ‘85, they had the ideal personnel with their receivers, Duper and Clayton, that could get off the line, and Dan Marino with that lightning release and laser accuracy. Most teams didn’t have 2 receivers that could both get off the line, plus a superstar QB with the perfect skill set that could beat the 46 regularly.

by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 17, 2008 9:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The 85 bears were done in by injuries in 86 & 87, not by the opposition, but West Coast teams made a good living defeating it with quick passes. Mobile and quick throwing QB do well because they can negate some of the presure. Statues with slow deliveries can be in for a long day.

Football is evolving so a 2008 version has wrinkles that the 85 Bear did not. The defense takes a lot of talent in the secondary because it calls for corners to be on an island. The biggest counter three step passes to recievers catching the ball on the run. Marino was able to beat it because his release was amazingly fast at that point in his career.

by Trey, on Nov 17, 2008 10:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And the NFL invented, I believe accidentally, the brand new pass play in the last few years where they purposely underthrow the ball, especially down the sidelines, giving the WR a huge advantage.

Funny, it worked by accident so many times, someone figured why not do it on purpose, and it’s common now.

by Realist Larry on Nov 18, 2008 1:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Raf

sometimes what you write is too much for me to understand, but I see “Chicago” and “46” in a story about the Cowboys defense and that makes me happy. It seems to me the defense has been very disruptive the last three games, even when the Giants scored 35. Is this because Wade has apparently become more involved with the defensive play calling?

My questions are, when is Felix Jones coming back, and what is the status of Pacman Jones? I am not sure how I feel about the latter Jones coming back and possibly messing with a good thing.

by DavidH22 on Nov 17, 2008 9:25 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

How could he????

How can Pacman mess it up? If he comes back, then he comes back and plays….he can be pretty good!!, If he gets suspended again or whatever the hell happens to him, then we’re back to where we are now…..I dont see the issue. I believe Jerry and the coaches felt that way as well, therefore the the Jenkins and Scandrick picks.

by ManTab on Nov 17, 2008 9:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i think the whole Pac thing is kind of a bonus

because of how they structured the deal as so low risk. as you say, they drafted as if they were not depending on him. if they had not done the deal at all, we’d be right where we are (except the rookies would have some more playing time). we got some decent games out of him. And we actually got a pick back already when we got suspended, so in a way maybe that will work out for the best. in fact, that might have freed Jerry up a bit to make the RW11 trade. so overall I’d say the whole thing has been a win even if he doesn’t come back, and he still has the potential to come back and contribute, perhaps for years to come.

by scottmaui on Nov 17, 2008 9:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Disagree

he’s a circus and distraction and should be cut. Period. Or sit on the bench behind Jenkins and Scandrick with Henry, maybe not even be activated unless someone gets hurt. You can’t downplay the mental aspect of this game. This team needs to pull together now, and he’s not that much better to be worth the trouble.

And he SUCKED as a Punt returner! I’d rather see Crayron catch it, run 8 yards, and go down.

by Realist Larry on Nov 18, 2008 12:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

up until the incident, he was not really that big of a distraction, and has always been considered a good teammate and a hard worker. His problems have not been in the locker room or on the field. And even if he sat on the bench, which I could agree with at least in the short term, he still would provide valuable depth.

and on the punt returns, I agree he runs backwards way too often, but he does have much more big play potential, if he could get it together with his blockers and then not try so hard when it isn’t there.

by scottmaui on Nov 18, 2008 1:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He wasn't a distraction, up to the "incident"

Exactly. Now, it’s different. If he comes back there will be a media circus around that.
Right or wrong, I don’t think he deserved what he got, or that any of us even know WTH happened, but what’s done is done.

We don’t need him, but I’d sit him and see how bad he wants it.

by Realist Larry on Nov 18, 2008 11:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

use him or cut him

i know there were a ton on the old BSR that HATED the signing of Pacman. i was not one of them. now, it appears that they either want to cut him or bench him.

here’s my thoughts: he’s a dang good CB. let him knock of the rust and use him on the field. or cut him. don’t keep him and sit him down. for God’s sake, don’t leave him on the bench with gimpy Henry still getting near the field of play.

Wins matter at this point.

personally, i’d keep him and eventually start him again (once his rust wears off) since statistically he’s OUR BEST CORNER! but, i’m more than pleased with the play of our younglings and wouldn’t mind just moving forward with them and TNew.

But if the question is Henry plays or Pac plays, give me the one who isn’t drawing disability and retirement… even if he makes it rain.

I commented. You're welcome.

another transplant from The Blue & Silver Report

by bulldog jeeper on Nov 19, 2008 5:40 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Parl

The Fins and Dan Marino were the only ones who solved that great Bear D of 85-86. They did it with short drops and Marinos very quick release.

by 082288 on Nov 17, 2008 9:58 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

DavidH22

when it comes to the time line of Cowboys injuries just do this…….

Take what the Cowboys say and add 2-4 weeks. So I am guessing Felix will be back in time for the Steeler game :)

I hope soon because MBII can use some plays or series off. And, it does not seem as though JG has much trust in Choice

by 082288 on Nov 17, 2008 10:03 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

If felix is not ready for this game,

then I doubt he comes in before the short week before the seahags game. I think if the team doubts his health they will err to be cautious and make sure he is 100% before the imporatant 4 game run over tougher opposition. Ask yourselves this question, do the next two teams present a def challenge that would require uncle felix; I would say that the current cast should hone what they are doing right now and when felix comes in it will be a bonus not a necessity.

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Nov 17, 2008 10:25 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

and hopefully we can get enough of a lead

that they’ll feel comfortable giving Choice more carries and not put such a huge burden on MB3 game after game

by scottmaui on Nov 17, 2008 10:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

44-0

I’ll never forget the 44-0 game that was the Bears comming out party and the end of the line for Danny White. Tom Landry once said it was a low point in his coaching carreer.

by Trey, on Nov 17, 2008 10:28 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Offenses, Defenses...

yeah, I did. That’ll teach me not to write when I’m fixing dinner.

by Rafael Vela on Nov 18, 2008 1:05 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hope it was as good as my leftover pizza, the #1 dinner in the world!

by Realist Larry on Nov 18, 2008 1:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Swap meals

I remember in college … it was cold beer and warm pizza at night and cold pizza and warm beer in the morning …

Ah, the memories …

Stop the Madness - Enshrine Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes

by Raul Villaronga on Nov 18, 2008 8:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

co-sign

"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson

www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]

by silverblue5 on Nov 18, 2008 9:19 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comon Redball

Bring out the Wildcat formation!!!

by Barberak on Nov 18, 2008 6:49 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

great analysis...

man i love this new formation…..more more more wade……

"They need security in the world, Craig!"

by Tuna Helper on Nov 18, 2008 10:53 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Why The Eagles Game Is Not About Romo
Small
Cowboy / Eagle game analysis - using Drives instead of pure stats
Captain_small
NFL Power Rankings - Week 9 - Final Edition
Sadie_eagles__small
Since we're all looking forward to it:
Captain_small
Seven Statistical Nuggets To Ponder

Recent FanPosts

Captain_small
Pigskin Pundits Predictors Picking Philly
Cowboy_small
We go big or we go home...
Small
great article from Philly writer
Small
Bench Roy Williams
Arnold_small
Matchups? Cowboys and Eagles looking to beat each other
Small
Roy - Your Dirty Laundry Stinks!
Small
10 Keys to the Eagles game
Tom-landry-at_small
Relax Dallas Fans; Roy Williams Isn’t Turning Into T.O.
Small
Should Wade's contract be extended???
Profilepicbtb_small
The true reason I hate Philly more than any other team...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Pats Pulpit
Sunday Fish Fry Part 2: Man the Longboats! Patriots offense v. Dolphin D
Arrowhead Pride
Chiefs Release WR Bobby Engram; RB Kolby Smith to Active Roster
Stampede Blue
Dear Bill Polian: Please sign Jack Williams ASAP

SPONSORS


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher