Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Dead - Former NFL QB Shot and Killed


spread the word

A 2nd Look at the Tape: Cowboys Are Line Dancing

Dallas' Defensive Linemen are Finally Playing Aggressive, Consistent Football

The play of every defensive lineman who was not Jay Ratliff was the biggest disappointment of the first half.  Chris Canty was so obscure the milk carton people couldn't find him.  Marcus Spears would make a play here and then fade to who knows where.  Tank Johnson was in and out with little injuries.  Jason Hatcher accompanied Canty on his trip around the dark side of the moon.

Now, they're all playing much better and it's letting the inside linebackers, Bradie James in particular, fly to the football and make plays.  Let's call roll on yesterday's solid performance.

 

Star-divide

Canty played perhaps his best game of the year.  He held his point the way he did last year.  He got off blocks and pursued.  Just as important, he kept his lane discipline.  Canty was very aggressive in Washington but was too aggressive at times.  He would chase plays too far and actually run beyond Jay Ratliff in his zeal to make a tackle. 

In a one-gap scheme all front seven guys need to keep their place -- the soccer folks have a phrase called "keeping your shape" that applies here -- so they don't unintentionally create cutback lanes.

Canty also showed some rush skills, especially when Dallas used its 4-2-5 sets or its "chaos" 2-4-5 sets.  Canty lined up over the guards in both packages.  He plays a 5 technique DE in Dallas' 3-4 but he can be a terror as a 3 technique rusher.  Dallas needs this pressure to continue;  Ratliff needs help breaking down pockets.

Which brings us to Marcus Spears.  He's also playing his smartest, most aggressive football.  He was just behind Ratliff on the lineman production sheet in Washington and he kept making plays.  He slanted inside and forced Frank Gore wide on a goal line play.  Demarcus Ware cleaned up, dropping Gore for no gain on Dallas' first goal line stop in the first quarter.  He's been very good at getting off blocks and getting to the ball carrier on any runs to his side of the line.

Spears was also part of a long-delayed line experiment.  In camp, the coaches worked at swapping Spears and Ratliff, moving the thicker Spears to NT and sliding Ratliff to DE, where he would theoretically have more space to rush. 

In the 2nd quarter, when Dallas had the 'Niners backed up at their one, the linemen flopped.  Spears and Tank Johnson played inside and Ratliff and Canty lined up as ends in a 4-4 package, with James and Kevin Burnett playing inside Demarcus Ware and Anthony Spencer.

The Niners tried running right at Spears and he split a double team expertly, dropping to a knee and creating a scrum.  Gore had nowhere to go and was stopped by Spears and friends for no gain.  Spears toughness against the run may encourage Dallas to give Spears more reps inside.  We'll see.

Other Notes:

The Bear Rampages Again -- I hate referring to Buddy Ryan in any context, so I'm going to refer to Wade Phillips' version of the 46 defense as the "Bum" package from now on. 

Wade continued to sprinkle in Bum calls this week and it produced.  On San Francisco's first series, Phillips called it when the Niners had a 3rd and long just inside Dallas territory. Bradie James walked over to Greg Ellis' side on San Francisco's left side.  The 'Niners slid their protection in Ellis' direction which meant that Demarcus Ware was able to come off the right edge unblocked.  He flushed Shaun Hill from the pocket and forced an incompletion.

Early in the 2nd quarter Dallas employed a wrinkle to the Bum set that produced a sack.  The 'Niners were in a 2nd and long just after Dallas had taken a 9-6 lead.  They lined up in a two-TE, one-RB set, with Vernon Davis and Billy Bajema lined up together next to RT Jonas Jennings.    Isaac Bruce and Bryant Johnson were set up wide on the left and right.

Prior to the snap, James lined up next to Anthony Spencer on the strong side.  This time, however, he lined up outside Spencer.  This put James over Bajema and Spencer over Davis.  At the snap, Davis released to go upfield. 

Phillips called for both Spencer and James to blitz off the right edge.  Bajema should have blocked James, leaving Spencer to be picked up by the running back.  The 'Niners blockers were crossed up.  Bajema tried darting inside to cut off Spencer and left James for the back, who slid wide and cut James off.

The reach block was too big of one for Bajema -- Spencer blew past him easily and sacked Hill. 

This package is making things easy for the Cowboys but hard for their opponents.  More Bum rushes, please.  (pun intended!)

Other notes:

-- Dallas continues to use pressure sets in 3rd-and-short situations, because its rush has been strong.  Yesterday the Cowboys put nine men in the box on a 3rd-and-2.  Both Ken Hamlin and Keith Davis were just five yards off the line of scrimmage.  It was the corners, Terence Newman and Anthony Henry, who played deep, at seven yards off the line.  The Niners tried beating the pressure with a wheel route to RB Gore, but Demarcus Ware ran with him and knocked down the pass.

-- Martellus the Brutish:  The Martellus Bennett roll out continues.  He caught his second TD pass in two weeks, a two yarder in the 2nd quarter.  More importantly, he showed solid lead blocking skills.  Bennett got several reps as the FB in off-set I sets and led Marion Barber on isolation plays. 

Bennett cleared out Takeo Spikes each time.  He's showing a consistent ability to hit the right shoulder, get his massive frame low and generate leverage.  He's taking more and more reps from Tony Curtis.  No knock against Curtis, but he lacks the athleticism Bennett has.

-- Deon the Determined:  Dallas is also getting solid blocking from Deon Anderson.  With Kyle Kosier again nursing a sprained foot the Cowboys will need improved TE and FB blocking to compensate for the performance dropoff from Cory Proctor to Kosier.

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 recs | Comment 97 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

1st

"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee

by BigDinSC on Nov 24, 2008 5:03 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Spears is really improving

to line up both inside and outside!
Sorry Raf, just thought you might want to go back and fix that…

"In the 2nd quarter, when Dallas had the ’Niners backed up at their one, the linemen flopped. Spears and Tank Johnson played inside and Spears and Canty lined up as ends "

Or is that part of a big contract push? 8)

by Realist Larry on Nov 24, 2008 5:12 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The development of Martellus just has me dreaming of what this offense can do next year

Imagine running passing plays out of the formation with him and Witten lined up in the backfield with Barber. With T.O. and RW2 on the outside, the mismatches will be endless.

by mhuff13 on Nov 24, 2008 5:14 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

also,

did you mean “give Spears more reps inside”?

Just trying to help.
Great analysis on the DLine, I hope they keep it up-last year they looked great midseason too, then…..

by Realist Larry on Nov 24, 2008 5:15 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ah, Editors

just what my bleary eyes need.

Thanks

by Rafael Vela on Nov 24, 2008 5:21 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How good is San Francisco's o-line?

The Giants will be the true test. And Seattle has a pretty good line I think, who else do they have besides Walter Jones?

by quincyyyyy on Nov 24, 2008 5:17 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The 'Niners Line

is not very good.

But Dallas did what it’s supposed to with a line like that, push them around.
I’d be concerned if they struggled.

by Rafael Vela on Nov 24, 2008 5:20 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Blog Additions

For me, Grizz’s press conf recaps and tape reviews made BTB my favorite Cowboys blog. The addition of Vela’s perceptive analysis only makes it doubly so. Kudos!

by hdc on Nov 24, 2008 5:21 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This is all good news

But the defense still gave up over 300 yards to Shaun Hill.?. The run defense was great but I’m guessing that TO won’t be given free roam in our road games against Pittsburgh and Philly, and in home games against NY and Baltimore.

Good solid win, but this was Sanfran. The playoff race is too close for comfort, and I’m willing to bet we have a harder schedule remaining than most of those challenging us for a wild card spot. This may not end well

by SLIDE 910 on Nov 24, 2008 5:37 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How many of those 300 yards came when the defense went into la dee friggin da mode in the 4th?

The Cowboys did what they had to do early holding the 9ers to field goals and then in the middle part of the game they stopped the 9ers cold. However, against better teams but holding lesser leads, what kind of strategy can we expect Wade to employ in the 4th quarter? Hopefully one not as lax as the one we saw yesterday.

I agree that how T.O. fares the rest of the way is still a curiosity at this point. The 9ers, for some reason, played him exactly in the manner which is most conducive to him lighting it up. I think Pittsburgh is probably the toughest remaining game simply due to the fact that there is no way the Cowboys will be able to run on them; particularly with Corey “light in the loafers” Proctor in the line-up. Also, Romo’s struggled with Jim Johnson defenses at times. What kind of fits will Dick LeBeau’s scheme give him?

by MadMick on Nov 24, 2008 6:08 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A huge chunk of those yards were from the prevent defense

That for some reason we went into during the 3rd quarter…

And I disagree, I think the Ravens defense will be harder to run on than Pittsburgh. They both will be tough though for sure.

And has Romo struggled with Jim Johnson defenses, or has the offensive line? It’s hard to do much against a defense when you’re laying on your back the entire game. Just ask Tom Brady in the Super Bowl.

by mhuff13 on Nov 24, 2008 6:15 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Romo was flat-out horrible in those games.

In addition to being confused, Romo had a horrible game throwing against the Eagles last December. He was the NFL equivalent to a wild pitcher in that game with virtually all of his throws being off the mark besides a deep throw to Crayton that was perfect. He simply had an off game; even before his arm got dinged sometime midway through the game. He was throwing erratically as Wild Thing Rick Vaughn in those Major League movies.

He was pretty shaky too in the game against the Eagles on Christmas day in ‘06. The Brady comparison isn’t accurate either. Brady felt far more pressure in the Super Bowl than Romo felt in either of those games against the Eagles and he had a far better game in the Super Bowl than Romo had in either of those losses; 24-of-39 while Romo wasn’t even able to sniff the 50 percent completion mark. Brady also got the Patsies the lead late in the game in the Super Bowl. Romo had multiple opportunities to still pull out the game against the Eagles last season but blew every chance he had.

As for the Ravens/Steelers, it really doesn’t matter who’s run defense is technically better; the point is with Proctor in the line-up it’s going to be next to impossible to run on either of those defenses. Besides, if you want to know who the better run defense is, compare how many rushing yards the Giants got against the Steelers and Ravens.

The more difficult game wil be against the Steelers because they can run the ball better than the Ravens and even though their passing game has been marred by both Big Ben holding onto ball too long as well as the O-line having breakdwons, they still have more weapons than the Ravens.

by MadMick on Nov 24, 2008 6:29 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sure Romo has had two bad games against Philly

but he’s also had two awesome games against Jim Johnson’s defense as well, going a combined 55-41-637-6-2 and leading the offense to 79 points. And he’s performed pretty well against Steve Spags defense too, even including the playoff debacle.

by DavidH22 on Nov 24, 2008 6:39 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Very true.

I was just pointing out that LeBeau’s defenses have been even more consistent at terrorizing offenses than Jim Johnson’s have over the years so it would be uncharacteristic of Romo NOT to make some mistakes.

I’m one of the bigger Romo backers you’ll find but suggesting his two bad games against the Eagles were mostly the O-line’s fault is a little misleading to say the least.

by MadMick on Nov 24, 2008 6:51 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Just goes back to what I say about QB's getting too much blame

If nobody is being blocked up front, every QB will make mistakes. Believe it or not, the other 51 guys on the team have an effect on a game.

by mhuff13 on Nov 24, 2008 6:53 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You're not going to get me to say Romo is perfect.

He simply had a bad game against the Eagles last year in December. He played even worse than he did in the Bills Monday Night because at least in that game he was making some positive plays.

by MadMick on Nov 24, 2008 6:58 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Lo and behold, what do I find

In 2 wins against Philly Romo is 41-55 75% 636 yards 6 TD and 2 Int, and was sacked ZERO times.

In 2 losses 27-65 42% 356 yards 1 TD 5 INT and 6 sacks.

What’s missing in the first column that is in the second one?

by mhuff13 on Nov 24, 2008 7:01 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So what?

I already knew that and up above you David cited those exact numbers from Romo’s pair of wins over the Eagles. One of Romo’s trademarks is being able to elude the rush. Being sacked six times doesn’t excuse going 27 for 65. If Romo didn’t play bad against the Eagles the past two Decembers, when has he ever played a bad game in his life?

by MadMick on Nov 24, 2008 7:04 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The O-line certainly wasn't to blame.

When Romo threw a pick in the red zone in last year’s loss to the Eagles. That was all on him.

by MadMick on Nov 24, 2008 7:05 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm not saying Romo's perfect

I’m just saying it’s alot easier to get a 75% completion when you have a nice pocket.

by mhuff13 on Nov 24, 2008 7:11 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Peyton Manning is one of the best examples of this. Get pressure on him and he’s nothing like his usual self. That’s how we beat him a couple years back.

by SLIDE 910 on Nov 24, 2008 11:36 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd be willing to go out on a limb

And say that in those 2 games, he rarely got sacked. Which goes back to my OL argument.

by mhuff13 on Nov 24, 2008 6:54 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Romo has been

up and down against Jim Johnson (and his disciples) defenses. This year against Philly he put up monster numbers. Just like last years first game against the Giants.

I think when it comes to beating these teams that pressure, it comes down to the OL doing their job by opening the running lanes and giving the QB time to find the open man.

by desus32 on Nov 24, 2008 6:41 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rafael....I think you were a little off on Hatcher

He nearly had a sack and had a couple of nice pressures. Not bad for a spot player. Spears was his usual no show and Canty wasn’t exactly lighting it up. Ratliff was real good, but as many have pointed out he is playing out of position and should be a DE. Imagine him at DE next year with true wide bodied 3-4 NT…..

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 24, 2008 5:52 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What's the basis of your "no show" comment?

Spears has been stuffing every run in direction lately.

As for Canty “not lighting it up” again, what does that mean? I’m comparing him to his recent games and he’s clearly playing better.

by Rafael Vela on Nov 24, 2008 6:20 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Just get used to it.

He has to make it known every time that someone mentions Marcus Spears that he is horrible and as soon as we get a big NT he is gone so Rat can be an All Pro DE.

by Mandmeisterx on Nov 24, 2008 6:23 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Got it

old line Soviet thinking: Marcus Spears is a friend of the enemy of the people.

Or is that Maoist?

by Rafael Vela on Nov 24, 2008 6:27 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ok, Einstein....

What has Spears shown in nearly 4 season…….notta……Sacks aren’t everything, but he doesn’t create pressure. Yeah, he is decent against the run, but we need more the reason moving Ratliff makes a whole lot of sense. I’’m not even saying Canty is playing much better this season, but in the past he has been clearly better than Spears. Spears, a first round pick should show up more in the games. He is a one dimensional DE and once his contract is up kiss him goodbye. Alot of regulars to BTB, including Grizz have pointed out several times in the past Spears is not getting the job done period!!

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 24, 2008 7:07 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I didn't say I think Spears has been a monster either,

I just saying I got it the first 10,000 times you said the same thing.

by Mandmeisterx on Nov 24, 2008 7:10 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The past is the past....

And as of late, I have to say Spears has looked better than Canty. Plus I think Spears still has another year left on his rookie deal, so he’ll be here next season. I can’t imagine Canty gets resigned in the offseason unless he just explodes over the next few weeks.

In theory, the goal this offseason will be to get a monster NT and play Spears/Rat as the DE’s.

by TLCM on Nov 24, 2008 7:12 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Do you know much about the 3-4?

DE in the 3-4 aren’t sack machines like everyone expects a DE to be. The eat up space so that the LB can make all the plays.

by mhuff13 on Nov 24, 2008 7:13 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

True dat!

Seems like Spears has made a number of plays in the backfield though this year, both in the run and pass

by TLCM on Nov 24, 2008 7:14 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

3-4 DE typically don't..but

He should be more of distrupive force in nearly 4 seasons. 4.5 sacks and hardly any pressures to speak of isn’t very good for a former first round pick…

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 24, 2008 7:19 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'll take what he gives for his price

Sure we could use better, but we’re not going to get it without breaking the bank.

by mhuff13 on Nov 24, 2008 7:21 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Did I Write that Spears Has Been Great the Past Four Years?

No.

Did I say he’s a special player?

No.

I said he’s been playing his best football of late. And he has.

What’s your point, that Spears can’t possibly be playing well because he played poorly in the past?

by Rafael Vela on Nov 24, 2008 7:24 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Raf...

Maybe you weren’t paying attention….or maybe I was smoking crack….but I seem to clearly remember you referring to Spears as the 2nd coming of Richard Seymour several times in your write up…lol

by TLCM on Nov 24, 2008 7:30 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wow..what was he smoking..lol

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 24, 2008 7:45 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sorry...

Couldn’t help it…

by TLCM on Nov 24, 2008 7:46 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Interesting

So, when Dallas gets a big butt NT Ratliff is going to play BOTH DE positions simultaneously?

Awesome

by Rafael Vela on Nov 24, 2008 6:29 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You can't question his motor

very few guys could hold both sides of the line simultaniously

"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee

by BigDinSC on Nov 24, 2008 6:31 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wow!

I knew Rat was good, but I didn’t know he was THAT good! Very impressive, not many players in the league can play 2 positions at once! MVP for sure!

by TLCM on Nov 24, 2008 7:09 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thankfully Romo is a good guy

or he’d tell TO that he can’t throw it and catch it too after one of Owens’ many, many drops…

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Nov 24, 2008 8:33 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Right now I would take Canty over Spears by a mile

Again….Canty isn’t tearing up the stat sheet, but he at least once in awhile he get’s a sack and is a distruptive force in the backfield. If this was Spears contract year he would be out without a shadow of a doubt, but since it’s not he will probably play out his contract and not be signed to an extension. Canty, on the other hand isn’t showing a whole lot to warrant a new deal. I’m a big Canty fan, but I don’t see him being here next year. If it were me…I would draft a NT, move Ratliff to Canty’s DE position and the following off season draft a stud 3-4 DE to replace Spears.

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 24, 2008 7:15 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Draft a stud 3-4 DE?

So you’re expecting us to have a top 10-15 pick in 2010?

And once again. DEFENSIVE ENDS DON’T GET SACKS IN THE 3-4.

Look at Pittsburgh, where they have mastered the 3-4. Their starting ends have a combined 4 sacks.

by mhuff13 on Nov 24, 2008 7:19 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pitt's DE's get a ton of pressure the reason they have the #1 defense

DE Aaron Smith has 4 sacks this season…not 4 for his career like Spears. Smith also has 40 sacks in 10yrs.

Nick Eason has 1 sack this season

Brian Keisel has 1 this season, but 11.5 since 2005.

You really can’t compare their DE’s to ours.

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 24, 2008 7:31 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No the reason they have the #1 defense is their linebackers get to make plays while their DE eat up space

I grew up near Pittsburgh, have been to about a dozen games at Three Rivers. Know them pretty well. Sure their DE’s get more sacks than ours, but the point I’m trying to make is that DE’s in the 3-4 don’t normally get alot of sacks. Smith had 2 seasons of 8 sacks. That’s nowhere near stud 4-3 DE’s.

by mhuff13 on Nov 24, 2008 7:34 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nate on DC.com made a interesting statement the other day and this sums it up

He said that our LB’s will only be as good as the 3 lineman in front of him. So which basically says our starting 3 defensive lineman aren’t very good or inconsistant. Either we need better ILB’s or we need to improve are DE’s.

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 24, 2008 7:41 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm just going to throw this out....

But the defense has been playing very well lately, and as Raf pointed out, its the improved play up front thats making the difference.

Also having the CB’s play more man is playing a part in that as well.

by TLCM on Nov 24, 2008 7:44 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Canty should be proving he is the man this year

since it is his contract year. But instead, he goes into full fledged regression. If you think Canty has outplayed Spears you are blind. Every time I see Canty, save this last game, he’s been blown off the ball and shoved five yards downfield or overpursues and gives up the big cutback. He has just been sad all together.

by Mandmeisterx on Nov 24, 2008 7:21 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1 I agree

He should be tearing it up, but is not. Like I said, I like him alot, but I don’t see how Jerry gives him a new contract based on what he has done this season.

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 24, 2008 7:34 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Canty should be proving he is the man this year

since it is his contract year. But instead, he goes into full fledged regression. If you think Canty has outplayed Spears you are blind. Every time I see Canty, save this last game, he’s been blown off the ball and shoved five yards downfield or overpursues and gives up the big cutback. He has just been sad all together.

by Mandmeisterx on Nov 24, 2008 7:21 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Just give it another season...

Rat’ll play both ends and SS! Now thats motor!

by TLCM on Nov 24, 2008 7:16 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

On another topic...

How does Greg “the whiner” Ellis only have 4 sacks to this point? I mean seriously, Rat’s the NT and he’s got 6!!! (I know he’s playing both DE spots next year, but really?) Hell, Bradie’s only 1 behind Ellis…

He plays opposite D.Ware, who everyone knows you have to stop (not that they can) and who gets all the chips and double teams, seems like the other OLB should be having a field day over there….

by TLCM on Nov 24, 2008 7:27 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ellis is definately having a down year

He’s been invisible for weeks, until this week.

by mhuff13 on Nov 24, 2008 7:31 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Its really too bad....

He had such a great year last season, and not much happening there this time around…

Hope to see Spencer help pick up some slack.

by TLCM on Nov 24, 2008 7:35 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In my ideal world

Spencer takes over full time next year. Ellis is a situational pass rusher at DE in Spear’s place on passing downs. It will make Ellis’s career last much longer.

by mhuff13 on Nov 24, 2008 7:37 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think it will happen...

However, be prepared for an all-time great Ellis whining session in the offseason…lol

by TLCM on Nov 24, 2008 7:39 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In my ideal world...

Next year our base D consists of:
DL Spears, Rat,& a monster NT to be named later
LB’s Ware, Spencer, James & Burnett(if he can stay healthy)
CB’s Newman, Jenkins, Scandrick
S’s Hamlin and a SS to named later

by TLCM on Nov 24, 2008 7:52 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't think Burnett will be here

Burnett will be a UFA and with his injury history I don’t see him getting a new contract. He will get starter money somewhere else. He won’t here as a backup. Look for us to draft another ILB or acquire one via FA.

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 24, 2008 7:55 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

I’ve been saying that all year. It’s a shame, because I think he is probably our second best LB next to Ware when he’s able to stay on the field.

by Mandmeisterx on Nov 24, 2008 8:25 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How's that?

He’s got some talent, but he doesn’t play enough for you to make that statement.

James is clearly having his best year yet and only Ware has turned in a better performance thus far.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Nov 24, 2008 11:39 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Burnett's our only Lb with speed

and we need him. He’s the only one who can cover, and would be valuable even as a 3rd down specialist. He prob. takes over for ZThomas next year, or at least gets lots of plays.

Ask yourself this: With his injury history, why would any OTHER team pay him?? Besides Cowboys blogs, I don’t think the guy has especially made a name for himself around the league. He’d be a 2nd-tier FA for sure. I don’t see him commanding huge money.

If we lose him it’ll hurt our pass D, I think he’s coming into his own and seeing more time, instead of just being situational. I’m thinking the coaches and JJ want to see how he plays the rest of the year, and if he can not get injured.

by Realist Larry on Nov 25, 2008 1:24 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I hope they can keep Burnett on the cheap

I agree with everything you said, he’s the fastest and best coverage ILB. But the injury history is a major concern. If he does replace Thomas, can he make it through an entire season? Can he be more than a nickel LB?
It will probably come down to his market value and if there is a team that would risk offering him a big contract.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Nov 25, 2008 4:14 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bradie James blows,

plain and simple. Does he make a lot of tackles? Yes. Is he always around the ball? Yes. Problem? It’s always six yards downfield. James hardly ever steps up and fills gaps. He NEVER attacks the ball. He can’t cover to save his life. He’s just not that good.

by Mandmeisterx on Nov 25, 2008 7:05 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

I’ve been saying this for awhile. James is a average 3-4 ILB. He would probably be a better 4-3. He get’s blown off the ball way too easy, doesn’t shed blocks very well and is terrible in coverage. I’ve also been saying Zack is not a 3-4 ILB either. Both make tackles, but rarely show up in games. Both are not difference makers or impact players like you see with Pitts ILBs. The reason why Burnett won’t be here is because we can’t pay him starter money to be a nickel LB. Especially not a LB that is injury prone. Imagine if he was starting? He would never see the field…lol

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 25, 2008 10:11 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

LMAO!!! yeah ok....

Foote is a probowl 3-4 ILB James is not…..funny terry..

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 25, 2008 9:33 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Totally wrong

You don’t understand his role in the defense if you think that.

He’s plays the thankless TED position, his responsibility is to clear out the blockers so Thomas can rack up the tackles. He’s also a damn good run stuffer. You’re not going to find guys playing that position that are coverage LB’s. I guarantee if he goes down, the defense would be screwed.

I notice you like to slam him every chance you get, but stats don’t lie.

He’s the leader of the defense.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Nov 25, 2008 3:18 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think his numbers show that he is a solid tackle machine,

which I have never denied. And I have no problem with him occupying blockers so that Thomas can make tackles. What I don’t like is that he’s constantly moving backwards. He isn’t attacking on the snap, heck, I’d even settle for him holding his ground. And most, if not all, of the tackles you see him make are from behind and the runners usually end up falling forward for another 2-3 yards after. I just want to see him be what you say he is. A run stuffer.

by Mandmeisterx on Nov 25, 2008 3:28 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If Thomas was still at his peak

You would have a better appreciation for the job Bradie James is doing. I’m not saying he’s a Pro Bowl LB, he’ll never get to that level. But there isn’t another guy on the defense that could do his job . With the new look 46 defense that Wade has incorporated into the scheme, he’s even more valuable.

I like Burnett, I agree he’s much better in coverage, but he would be manhandled if he was asked to do what James does.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Nov 25, 2008 3:44 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I personally think our ILB corp needs overhauled.

In saying that Burnett has been our 2nd best LB, that was more of an indication of the rest of our LB’s values more than a Burnett endorsement. People talk about all of the holes on this team (S, OL, NT), but not many on here have acknowledged that our LB corp is fairly subpar.

by Mandmeisterx on Nov 25, 2008 3:56 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dallas would also be well served to get space eater NT

That would be a big help to whoever we draft at ILB. OLB is still in need of a 4th guy to rotate.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Nov 25, 2008 4:17 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1 Mandrmeisterx it does need to be overhauled

James and Zach won’t cut it for the long haul. I really think we should draft a stud 3-4 ILB at some point. We are missing a dominate 3-4 ILB on this defense. Most of the other teams that play the 3-4 have at least one ILB that is dominate. We do not.

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 25, 2008 9:37 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sure... he is a good run stuffer 5 yards down field like another poster pointed out.

James is OVERRATED!!! whether you want to believe it or not. He is average against the run, horrible at blitzing and deplorable against the pass. One of these ILB’s needs to be better than average for this defense to be a very good defense. If you want to make James and Zach better ILB’s than we need better players up front. It would hide some of there weaknesses and give them more opportunities to make impact plays.

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 25, 2008 9:47 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I guess my original response was too tough

Let me put it another way. You’re lack of insight is very funny. I don’t think there is another poster that makes worse predictions or as many of them. I hope you enjoyed watching Bradie on Thanksgiving prove you wrong.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Nov 28, 2008 3:44 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If anything....

Our biggest worry at this point should be Kosier’s injury. (wtf is up with the injury bug this year???)

The D is playing well. Special teams actually contributed this week.

Losing Kosier is my biggest concern right now. We’ve seen how big a difference he makes. Can we make a playoff run without him?

by TLCM on Nov 24, 2008 7:46 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Terrellowenstonyromo_small
The True Area of Concern
Small
Food for thought
Jessica_simpson_tony_romo_main_small
Romo vs. December
Jessica_simpson_tony_romo_main_small
Romo vs. The Clutch
Profile3_small
For Tarheel Paul...

Recent FanPosts

Bitty-p_small
Playing Philly Twice...
Jessica_simpson_tony_romo_main_small
Wade vs. The Secondary
Stewie_small
Steve McNair dead
050_small
Tarheel pauls family
Small
Tony, Tiger and Me
Picture_6_small
Marvin Harrison rumor — Really? Again?
318039_small
Let's Put Our Heads Together Re: Ed Werder
Pirate2_small
Romo vs. Woods vs. Boehner

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Editor

Profile3_small Dave Halprin (Grizz)

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Michael_irvin1_800_small Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88)

Me70s_small Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31)

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Smile_small Jim Vance

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports