Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Cowboys @ Giants: What They're Saying

Welcome to a very sullen and dejected edition of What They're Saying. Not that losing to the Giants was surprising. I predicted a Cowboys victory with my heart, to keep my own spirits up going into the game...but did my head really believe we would win? Not really, I knew we were out-gunned going into the game and that the Giants are a better football team at this point in the season. So losing wasn't a shock to the system. But losing in the way we did, that was kind of sickening. We looked like a Pop Warner team out there and while the injuries were certainly a factor in losing, there was more going on than just that in the way we performed. Tony Romo returning will certainly help this team but it's not a magic elixir that will cure all our woes. The players better understand that and the coaches better understand that. If they don't then our season will not end up in the playoffs but on the scrap-heap. And that will be one ignoble fall for a team that had such high expectations.

From the start, the Cowboys couldn't stop the Giants. The first drive of the game ended with the Giants celebrating in our endzone. Still, Eli and company were determined to keep us in the game by making their own mistakes. Unfortunately, Brad Johnson was too busy returning the favor to do anything about it.

"We never really put ourselves in position to be in the game tonight," [Brad] Johnson said. "We didn't play as good as we needed to . . . I didn't do my part."

That slant pass that was picked-off when the Cowboys were driving was just the beginning of a long downward spiral. Almost every observer of the game knew that that was the point when you pull Brad and go with Brooks Bollinger. When Brad is turning the ball over, he's basically useless as a QB. Still, Wade couldn't pull the trigger. I don't want to hear that it was Jason Garrett's fault that we didn't change QB's then, Wade Phillips is the head coach, he is the guy who has to make the decision, he has ultimate authority on the field and he failed. Instead we get lame quotes like:

"We're playing from behind, which when you have your backup quarterbacks in there it's not a good position."

And this on Brooks Bollinger:

"Just another quarterback," the head coach said, pretty much summing up his alternatives.

I don't know, Wade is starting to lose me as a fan. I'm wondering if he's starting to lose the players. This "golly-gee what do you want me to do" act is wearing very thin.

Of course, when they finally made the change at halftime, it didn't exactly work out. Bollinger immediately dropped an INT on us.

"It's a tough one. It's disappointing," Bollinger said of the pass intended for tight end Jason Witten,... "I was just in a little bit of a hurry and it was a little quick for Witt. Poor decision."

As I wrote earlier this week, the Cowboys left themselves with no good options at QB once Romo was out. This falls squarely on the shoulders of the GM of this team, Jerry Jones.

"Looking at it in hindsight," Jerry Jones sheepishly said of his choices in backup quarterbacks, "we might have done things differently."

Ya think! I know it's easy to use hindsight to pick apart the failings of a football team, but the reason NFL GM's are in the position they are in is because they are supposed to use foresight to see these things. In our case, the GM is in the position he's in not because of foresight but because he owns the team.

When Tony Romo returns, things should improve on the offensive side of the ball, we should at least become competitive again. Unless he doesn't return immediately after the bye which still isn't a certainty - just ask Romo - who was asked that question after the game.

"Don't know," he said after the game. "Haven't tested anything yet."

"That begins this week," Tony said. "We will know more then."

Oh lordy, he better come back for the Washington game. The Cowboys managed to keep themselves in contention by winning the Tampa Bay game but their margin of error is razor-thin and going to Washington without Romo would probably be more than we could overcome.

To tell you the truth though, I'm tired of the Romo excuse. The rest of this team is supposed to be of championship caliber but they sure don't play like it and they sure don't seem to have the fire and fight needed to make a run. Patrick Crayton can say the wrong things at the wrong times, but he definitely had some accurate quotes after this game. 

"It's time for us to stop letting people take shots at us," Patrick Crayton said. "They're taking power shots at us, and we're just trying to get up against the ropes and survive. I'm tired of using the Romo injury as an excuse."

I think that quote may be the most compelling thing any Cowboy has said in a while. The rest of the team needs to pick it up when major injuries come, but it hasn't really happened for us.

"I don't have any answers," Ellis said, when asked if the injuries had sapped the Cowboys' competitiveness. "You would hope not.

"They don't cancel the season just because you lost your starting quarterback."

No they don't but I don't think the Cowboys players and coaches got that memo.

Click below to keep reading as the Cowboys players talk about what comes next.

Star-divide

In the Giants game, most of the fault lies with an offense that couldn't score and continually turned the ball over, putting the defense in difficult situations. Still, the defense wasn't blameless, they allowed the first drive of the game to be a demoralizing march right down the field for a TD. That basically set the tone and the Giants racked up impressive totals in the run game. Our defense was soft for the most part. 

"We knew we had to hold it together," inside linebacker Bradie James said. "We gave up seven points. If we could have given up three points, it could have been a different dynamic. We ended up getting some sacks and turnovers but it still wasn't enough, no matter what we were able to do. It still wasn't enough to win the game."

Right now, the Cowboys are teetering on the edge of a major disappointment. They have the bye week to get some injured players back and they have the bye week to get their minds right about how they want this season to end. They don't need just an infusion of healthy players back on the field, they need a complete overhaul of they're attitudes and their performances on the field. At least they're saying the right things.

Keith Davis:

"It's very frustrating," safety Keith Davis said. "We just got to go back to the drawing board. It's not over by any means. We're going to keep fighting and keep competing and get this bye week and get some people we need to get healthy, and some other guys are banged up. We have to refocus, and we'll have a tough one against Washington next week."

Jason Witten: 

"It's not where we thought we'd be after nine games, but I don't think anybody is panicking and saying the season is over," said tight end Jason Witten, who played Sunday after receiving two pain-killing injections around his broken rib. "We've got to make a run at this, and we all have got to understand we have to get better. It's not just going to happen because Tony [Romo] is coming back."

Terrell Owens: 

"The bye couldn't have come at a better time," Owens said. "It gives us time to reflect and clear our minds. When we come back after the bye, we better be ready to play. It's a test of character. But no one is giving up hope. It's not how you start, it's how you finish."

Zach Thomas: 

"We better be good quick," Thomas said. "We've got no room for error. But give them credit. They won in every category. You just gotta keep having faith and hopefully it will come together for the second half of the season."

We are now out of excuses. Whatever comes our way over the next seven games we have to make it work. Injury excuses are over, Wade Phillips protecting the players is over, the players not getting the job done is over. Every single thing you can think of that can be pointed to as a contributing factor to this poor first-half of the season has to be over.

"We know where we are and it's not where we planned to be at all," team owner Jerry Jones said. "It's very disappointing. We just didn't look anything like we had hoped to look."

You have seven games to get a new look. Seven games to make us forget about what's transpired so far. Seven games to prove it's not over.

0 recs  |  Comment 52 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Around SB Nation

What they're saying about Utah...

Mar 2009 from Block U - 10 comments

What they're saying

Dec 2008 from Block U - 4 comments

Trade Deadline Open Thread

Feb 2007 from Japers' Rink - 0 comments

Comments

Display:

Nailed it Grizz
To tell you the truth though, I’m tired of the Romo excuse. The rest of this team is supposed to be of championship caliber but they sure don’t play like it and they sure don’t seem to have the fire and fight needed to make a run

I could’nt agree more…..Romo can’t solve all are problems..

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 3, 2008 10:33 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Maybe it's because I didn't watch the game, but I think you guys are overreacting

Terry can back me up on this, I said before the Rams game we just needed to win one of the next three games before the bye week. And we did that.

Certainly this loss sucks, but lets wait and see what happens in Washington. If we lose there then I will be the first one to carry the proverbial pitchfork, but lets give our team a chance. And our defense a chance with a QB that won’t put them in horrible field position on every drive.

by quincyyyyy on Nov 3, 2008 10:37 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

It's more the way our team lost -- from an effort and discipline standpoint -- that's most concerning

The turnovers by BJ.

The numerous penalties — especially by our defense. Did Dallas set a record for most defensive penalties in a single game or what yesterday?

The poor tackling on defense.

The inconsistency of the O-line — not just in pass protection, which again was horrible, but also in run blocking. The most effective runs were the sweeps run by MBIII and a couple of delayed handoffs from the shotgun.

I can handle losing if the turnovers, the penalties, and the poor tackling were either minimal or non-existent. But that wasn’t the case. And yes, the players do play the games, but they’re continued bad habits are reflection of poor coaching.

Plain and simple.

"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson

www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]

by silverblue5 on Nov 3, 2008 10:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Tackling, penalties etc. are correctable problems

If Wade doesn’t correct these problems and win in Washington you could see the Jason Garrett era begin sooner rather than later.

by quincyyyyy on Nov 3, 2008 10:57 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What's frustrating as a fan is that...

these “correctable” problems are an ongoing theme in the Wade Phillips era.

It has to be pi**ing da he** out of King Jerry.

"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson

www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]

by silverblue5 on Nov 3, 2008 11:57 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The only thing Garrett may have done to help yesterday

was either to start Brooks or put him in earlier.
Other than that, his playcalling put the Cowboys in the hole. Even when Romo returns with his pinkie, Garrett has got to limit those playcalls that have the WRs running 7-15 yard outs.
And when the running game is excelling on toss plays, keep calling them until the defenses loosen up in the middle. Make them think outside before trying to stuff it in there again, especially when the middle of the line is getting pushed around and making Danny Clark look like Mike Singletary.

Where's Felix?

by Aaron Novinger on Nov 3, 2008 12:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's not overreacting..we have serious problems

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 3, 2008 10:39 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

oh we do I'm not denying that but they are very correctable problems

lets see what happens in Washington. Obviously we should still be able to win without Romo, but should we be able to win with Brad Johnson as QB? If we had a backup QB like Charlie Batch who wouldn’t make costly mistakes (and consequently put our defense in horrible position) and can move a team across the field would things have been different over the past three weeks? I think it might have.

by quincyyyyy on Nov 3, 2008 10:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

well said

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 3, 2008 10:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hideous

This team has so many built-in excuses they can’t remember which ones they’re supposed to use from week to week. From the Top down, they’re bumbling away the best opportunity this team had to win. Jerry mis-managed this place like a chain of Chinese Buffets, hiring al-so rans like Wade “Gimme a Break” Phillips AFTER hiring his prodigy in Red Jesus…..recipe for disaster……totally undermines any authority the Coach is supposed to have.

No Overraction here – the holes in the secondary didn’t get addressed fast enough, The O-line was overhyped a long time ago but Romo pulled so much “magic” out of his butt their weakness was ignored. Now that the “magic” is gone (since week 13 last year) the O-line is exposed as a bunch of easy-to-abuse Marshmallow Men.

by Doomsday on Nov 3, 2008 10:44 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Anthony Spencer if you read these boards...

…please stay healthy so i never have to see #98 on the field again

by BK Arsonist on Nov 3, 2008 10:47 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Amen. Ellis is DONE.

The personification of our whiney, underachieving bunch of overrated chumps on defense.

by GhostofGaryHogeboom on Nov 3, 2008 10:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

lol..agreed

Although, I think Ellis can be used in certain situations, but I don’t think he is a starting OLB anymore. He won’t be here next season I believe.

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 3, 2008 10:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Spencer

I know he’s been hurt, but I think his play shows what the Cowboys need to do to save the season: stick with the young guys.

Our vets are killing us. Keith Davis shoulda popped Hamlin in the mouth yesterday because Eli just threw a perfect pass to Boss. We gotta get someone ready to replace Flozell because I got a stinger in my neck this weekend and it hurts just to turn my head, let alone block Justin Tuck. or Kiwenuka. Maybe just keep Curtis over there permanently and for crying out loud, get Proctor outta there! He’s a backup center and nothing else.

Ellis is a nickel pass rushing DE. He can help this team, but Spencer needs to play alot more—actually he should be starting. Get Courtney Brown a start too.

Where's Felix?

by Aaron Novinger on Nov 3, 2008 1:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Your right Big the Vets are killing us

Ellis, Spears, James are the three that stand out. I’ve been pushing Spencer for awhile and I think if not for him being injured early on he would’ve pushed Ellis right out of the starting lineup, maybe to the bench.

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 3, 2008 4:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Romo will cure what ails this team offensively

and thats where the problem has been over the last three games, not scoring points. Sure the defense didn’t play as well as they did against the Bucs, but when your offense not only does absolutely nothing at all, but also puts the defense in bad spots throughout the game, its tough to put a lot of blame on them.

I don’t think fans would use Romo being out as an excuse if we had NFL caliber backups, but we don’t, so when your team is run by incompetent qbs, you’re going lose and lose bad.

This team will at least be competitive when Romo returns, and if they can refocus and re-energize, they can win at least 5 more games and make the playoffs.

The Cowboys have the talent to overcome Wade’s poor coaching.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 3, 2008 10:50 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I was just about to...

…say something relative to your last line.

It’s to the point where the players have to win IN SPITE of Wade.

"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson

www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]

by silverblue5 on Nov 3, 2008 10:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Couldn't agree more,

other than to say it’s BEEN this way since Wade took over.

I just hate all this B.S. that is spewed by others when trying to protect coaches—not just Wade, but any coach: “it’s up to the players to get motivated to play,” or “the players play”…

Is it just me, or does this sound like a bad idea:

“We HAVE to get motivated, cuz we HAVE to win this game!”

“Who’s responsible for that?”

“The players, they get paid either way—win or lose.”

The days of the majority of players caring about team success first are gone; that’s been apparent for at least a decade now.

Until teams begin inserting “win/loss clauses” into contracts, it will ALWAYS be on the coach to motivate the players.

by Starred4Life on Nov 3, 2008 11:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with Terry

I don’t think Romo will be the cure all, but I think he will work a lot of magic. Our defense sucks. They have sucked and they still suck. Remember last season? I think we all agreed in the off season that we needed to do something to fix the defense. However, with Romo leading the offense and getting us wins, we weren’t focusing on the crappy defense. Now that Romo is out and our offense is not playing well, the failures of the defense are becoming glaringly obvious. I think at the end of the season we need to get rid of Wade, Stewart, and clean house on defense.

"So you can’t stiff arm at all? What about the throat?"- Marion "Barbarian" Barber

by DC_fan on Nov 3, 2008 12:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

jeez, remember last game?

the Bucs game was only a week ago, when the D held a playoff contender who was averaging 23 points per game prior to that out of the end zone and to only 9 points. one big difference in that game is that, while the offense wasn’t doing anything great, they managed to avoid turning the ball over and forcing the D to defend a short field, which happened repeatedly against both the Rams and the Giants.

The defense is far from consistent and I have a lot of concerns about them too, but they have shown they have the potential to be good, and just last week everyone (even BSPN) was praising how good the D looked. I think when we get an offense that can sustain a drive again, the D will have a fighting chance as well.

by scottmaui on Nov 3, 2008 12:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well said Scott

That is the defenses problem: consistency. It boggles my mind how many 1st round picks that we have on that side of the ball, but they can not consistently play a good game. They tease us with visions of what they can accomplish (the TB game) but then they completely lay down for other games. I know Romo doesn’t tackle or block, but I think his play can help hide some of the more obvious problems on both sides of the ball.

"So you can’t stiff arm at all? What about the throat?"- Marion "Barbarian" Barber

by DC_fan on Nov 3, 2008 12:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1 Completely

Our defense isn’t the greatest in the world, but how can they be. They’re given an incredibly short field on a regular basis and asked to keep all drives less than 20 yards or they’re at least giving up a field goal. I certainly think there’s plenty of room for improvement, but they need a little help. Additionally, our anemic offense is keeping them on the field for 45 minutes/game…

by AikmanNailedMySis on Nov 4, 2008 6:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not only the talent

but they also come out swingin in games, which shows they have the heart. All this talk of lack of motivation and energy and switching up the head coach does nothing to get first downs.
Getting our QB back will certainly help get first downs and even score, but I don’t think the playcalling just base itself off of how to beat the 90’s Packers during Thanksgiving.
Ball control is the key to this season. That will save the defense from getting killed, and that will keep our QB healthy. For once, I’d like to see Garrett run the ball on 1st AND 2nd. Romo is more than capable of picking up 3rd and longs, but that was last year. This offense needs to adjust from being a big play threat to fighting for 4 yards every play.
Barber runs best outside.
Tashard is the best inside runner on this team, even outta the shotgun.
Felix just needs to be on the field when he gets back.

Where's Felix?

by Aaron Novinger on Nov 3, 2008 1:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

lol...I love it Terry keep preaching Romo...

Too bad he can’t help the other 100 problems we have….

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 3, 2008 10:51 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Wade's time is up.

Never seen a head coach look as lost as he does on the sidelines. And I am not trying to say he is not in the game in the least bit, but his whole demeaner when this team is not winning is so sorry….no fire at all in this guy. I am not sure getting rid of him right now whould do more good than bad, but I am ready to find out. Thanks Wade for the 13 wins last season and the first round playoff win as well. Now get out!

by goat3000 on Nov 3, 2008 11:21 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

That solution just sounds so easy, doesn't it?

Then maybe Wade can play NT and eat up some blockers!

Where's Felix?

by Aaron Novinger on Nov 3, 2008 1:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

According to Ed Werder

Romo still can’t grip a football or throw it with any velocity

Cowboys fan since 1978.. I was 3 years old

by Mullin on Nov 3, 2008 12:16 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Well, since it's Werder reporting

I will assume that Romo is almost back to normal and would be able to play this Sunday if we didn’t have the bye.

"So you can’t stiff arm at all? What about the throat?"- Marion "Barbarian" Barber

by DC_fan on Nov 3, 2008 12:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I was just printing what was reported

LOL

Cowboys fan since 1978.. I was 3 years old

by Mullin on Nov 3, 2008 12:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Time for Cowher in 2009

Grizz

I agree, Wade looks lost to me.

Time to bring in a tough nosed coach who will motivate the players.

That spells Bill Cowher to me. Jerry has too much tied up in the new stadium to not field a competitive team , so I don’t see him sitting still,

He’s got the equity in the franchise to spend on a new coach so I don’t think he’ll hold back due to $$$$

We have the talent to compete, they just don’t have the fire in them to do it…..

P.S. My delightful surprise would be that Jimmy J returns…………………….

by oldtimer on Nov 3, 2008 12:24 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

No! to Jimmy J

we would have to start from square one on our defense, I don’t want to start over

by quincyyyyy on Nov 3, 2008 12:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Cowher would be nice...

Some of these guys need to wake up out there and I think some spit in the face would do it….
And I think we all initially gave Wade the benefit of the doubt once we seen pics of his daughter but does she even atttend the games???

by goat3000 on Nov 3, 2008 12:31 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Not making excuses for the Defense

But, we get killed in the time of possession battle. The first half was ridiculous yesterday. You just knew that was a ticking bomb, especially with Jacobs. We need an offense that can sustain drives. Romo will at least provide that. If we can even out Time of Possession, we can be more competetive.

by King Man on Nov 3, 2008 12:37 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

I keep making this same point.

Our first nine drives of the game had an average time of possession of 1:29, average number of plays of 3.33, and average yards of 8. Four of those nine drives ended in turnovers.

The D does have it’s problems, but having an O that can’t stay on the field at all and turns the ball over repeatedly makes it really tough on a D.

Last week the O didn’t turn the ball over, and the D actually looked quite good.

by scottmaui on Nov 3, 2008 1:05 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought they looked good yesterday, too, Scott until...

they ended up being the only Cowboys team on the field for the majority of the game. It was the Giants offense AND defense against the Cowboys defense.

2 against 1=no contest.

Where's Felix?

by Aaron Novinger on Nov 3, 2008 1:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

As far as the offense goes...

We saw the tip of the iceberg with Felix Jones. His return will be HUGE for us. As good as MB3 has been, he’ll certainly benefit from the breaks that Felix can give. And lord knows that WE benefit from 9 yards a carry haha. I really was pissed when he went down, and his return, on top of Romo, Kosier, and RW2’s addition should almost assuredly bring our offense back to the top of the league. Like I said earlier, this will give the defense more rest and a bigger field to work with.

by AikmanNailedMySis on Nov 4, 2008 7:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I put this on Wade and Garrett

I knew winning this game was a long shot but you had to put a game plan together that gave you a chance to win. Lettting BJ sling the ball around was a bad move. I was expecting a very conservative approach to the game with the D keeping us in the game. I would of ran the ball 40 times in this game. I would have used both running backs. two series and switch unless we were in the red zone then Barber is in. I wouldnt care if we had 3 and out, the one thing we couldnt afford was turnovers and sacks. We played right into the Giants strength. I would have used play action on 1st down to keep them honest…..on third and long I would have thrown screens and ran drawes……Our hope would be for the D to step up and get a few turnovers( which they did) and keep the score close……..then put together 2 maybe 3 drives to use some clock and kick some field goals and try to steal the game. If this game would have been close in the 4th quarter, say 13-17 Giants. They would have started pressing because they wanted to punish us. The Coaches have to learn who their players are and what they are capable of doing, dont put them in the position to fail like they did with BJ and Brooks. The D came out and played well for a half, if we didnt turn the ball over and give them short fields we are in this game. In a game like this it’s not so much that you lost but how you lost………This could have been a confidence booster game win or a loss instead its a blow out with the team starting to point fingers and yell at each other on the sidelines because no one else is holding people accountable……which brings me to what a player said a few days ago from another team…….when they see one of there teamates make a mistake and watch him get chewed out by the coaching staff it makes you go over there and lift his spirits because there is no sense in piling on, pat on the butt and say its ok and lets get him next time. This is the reason your seeing players starting to yell and scream at guys who keep making mistakes…….noone else is going to do it……thats not how you build teamwork………I felt these 3 games (without Romo) would show us the character of this team…….sad to say it don’t look good……….

by jvw on Nov 3, 2008 1:16 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Disciplinarian Coaching

I wonder what the virtues of a Jimmy Johnson/Bill Cowher would be in the NFL today. These players are probably more prima donna than they were 10-15 years ago—would they really perform better? Many of them complained about the Tuna, but would he have gotten the 13-3 last year and maybe more in the playoffs? I think it’s tough to say whether a tough coach would motivate or just make people check out. Thoughts?

by SB2008 on Nov 3, 2008 3:16 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

JJT wrote an interesting article

on his blog at DMN. He theorizes that Parcells established a strong work ethic and winning culture in which all players were accountable for their play. If you didn’t produce, you were benched or even cut. Players who didn’t follow the rules were punished and held accountable.

Wade came in and the player accountability stopped. T.O. is always late to meeting because he knows Wade isn’t going to do anything about it. All the players know Jerry is really in charge and has no respect for Wade. If you make the team and earn a starting spot, you’re now part of the Cowboys family no matter how bad you play.

Very interesting read and he makes a lot of good points.

http://jacquestaylorblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/11/wade-and-jerry-have-wrecked-th.html

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 3, 2008 3:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Reminds me of when I was in high school

and went to live with my Dad because he let me party more with my friends than my Mom did.

Where's Felix?

by Aaron Novinger on Nov 3, 2008 5:07 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, Wade is like the softy parent

that all kids take advantage of.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 3, 2008 6:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's interesting

But would Cowher or Parcells really cut TO for missing meetings? Jimmy cut Curvin Richards, but what would he have done if Emmitt had dogged it in practice, which many said he did.

I think the issue is more respect than anything else; maybe yelling at the players and not acknowledging their accomplishments (Parcells) isn’t the best way to generate respect, but neither is the “aw-shucks-we-lost-again” crap we see from Wade.

Part of the problem in my opinion is that teams just can’t afford to cut expensive but non-performing players because of the cap hit.

by SB2008 on Nov 3, 2008 3:40 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I don't think JJT was implying T.O. should be cut

for being late to team meetings, but Parcells would fine him and if necessary not start him or suspend if it became a problem.

The point is with Parcells and other good coaches, there is player accountability. If players don’t practice hard and produce on Sundays, follow rules, there are consequences for their poor play or effort.

With Wade, there is none of that, if a player performs poorly, Wade just says, “well, we’ll work on that”.
No accountability which leads to poor play.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 3, 2008 3:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That makes sense

You think Jason Garrett could get respect?

by SB2008 on Nov 3, 2008 3:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think he would command more accountability than Wade

hell, I think anyone would command more accountability than Wade.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 3, 2008 4:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I also think that the players would have more respect for JG

He was a player in the league and I think that means quite a bit to players. But I also think JG needs to show that he still has what it takes to be considered a good OC as you also have to be good with the X’s and O’s.

"So you can’t stiff arm at all? What about the throat?"- Marion "Barbarian" Barber

by DC_fan on Nov 3, 2008 4:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What sucks about Wade

is he has little say in the offense. JG practically coaches that side of the ball by himself. I know that Wade Wilson is there, but Garrett is young. He needs another offensive mind to bounce ideas off of. Seems like he does that with Romo.

Where's Felix?

by Aaron Novinger on Nov 3, 2008 5:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

giants game

Forget about the back up qb, forget about the offence, forget about the defense.
The biggest thing that would have kept us in of that game aside for those things
was DON’T TURN THE BALL OVER Cause we did cause some turnovers of our own.
Had we held on to the ball and maybe then inserted Bollinger a little earlier who knows the game might have been a little closer. But i belive the dicision to bring in Bollinger
in the 3rd quarter 21 point blow out was to little to late . your thoughts?

by Dallas cowboy family 08 on Nov 4, 2008 5:15 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I know if I was HC

I would have given Brooks some more work in practice and then told Brad, look, you throw an INT, I’m bringing in Brooks, its as simple as that.

If there are no INTs by us in this game, then the game automatically becomes much more competitive because our defense wouldn’t have been put in those tough situations.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 4, 2008 7:23 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Way to take that sack Romo!
Captain_small
Seven Statistical Nuggets From The Land Of Sunshine
09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Why The Eagles Game Is Not About Romo
Small
Cowboy / Eagle game analysis - using Drives instead of pure stats
Captain_small
NFL Power Rankings - Week 9 - Final Edition

Recent FanPosts

Small
FOX coverage from Afghanistan
Bitty-p_small
The new media-darlings?
09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Dallas’ "Knockout" Player
Porkchop_small
Thumbs Up, Thumbs Down -- First Half of the 2009 Season
Sb_xliv_ring_small
Humble Pie is Yummy!
Ept_sports_nfl_experts-348355349-1231708620_small
Good game..
Dirkn_270_060605_small
Anthony Spencer Won This Game
Small
9 Points Shy of Undefeated: A Comparison

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mobile Live
Eagles fall to Cowboys 20-16
Mobile Live
Washington's Signs Of Life Confiscated By Falcons In 31-17 Defeat
Mobile Live
'Kudos & Wet Willies:' Rough day for Giants fans edition

SPONSORS


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher