Dallas Cowboys still on the outside looking in
The Cowboys didn't get any help today in their quest to slide into one of the two NFC wildcard spots. Currently the NFC South is foiling the Cowboys' hopes as Carolina (9-3), Tampa Bay (9-3) and Atlanta(8-4) are all ahead of Dallas in the conference. Dallas and Atlanta have the same record, but Atlanta holds the tie-breaker due to a better conference winning percentage.
Green Bay, New Orleans and San Diego all had a chance to win their games in the last minute but fell on their faces in the end. Most frustrating was watching Drew Brees, the darling quarterback of all media, force a bad throw on second down with plenty of time left to drive for the game tying field goal. Aaron Rodgers also forced a throw into coverage while attempting to lead his team from behind. So much for the NFC quarterbacks poised to overtake Romo as a Pro Bowl quarterback. Tony Romo now has the best quarterback rating in the NFC and trails Philip Rivers for the NFL lead by just a tenth of a point. [Note by Brandon W, 12/01/08 6:55 AM EST ] I guess the stats guys at NFL.com took a while to update Rivers' numbers....Romo now is the highest rated QB in the league.
But I digress.
The good news is that the NFC South contenders still have a couple of games against each other. Here is a breakdown of their final four games:
Carolina - vs. Tampa Bay, vs. Denver, at NY Giants, at New Orleans
Atlanta - at New Orleans, vs. Tampa Bay, at Minnesota, vs. St. Louis
Tampa Bay - at Carolina, at Atlanta, vs. San Diego, vs. Oakland
So mathematics tell us these teams will have to lose at least one more game this season. The best to hope for is for Carolina to win out and for Atlanta to lose to Tampa Bay, dropping Atlanta behind Dallas and putting the Cowboys ahead of Tampa Bay due to head to head tie-breakers. New Orleans winning out would help out a lot as well.
All this hinges on Dallas winning the rest of their games this season. The Cowboys hold the keys to their own destiny and at this point it is looking like 10-6 would mean missing the playoffs. 11-5 does not necessarily assure Dallas a wildcard berth either but it sure helps things. If the Cowboys lose only five games and miss the tournament, that loss to the Rams will hurt, hurt, hurt.
All they have to do is go 4-0 in December during the toughest four game stretch the team has faced in a very long time.
That's not too tough a thing to ask is it?
0 recs |
107 comments
|
Comments
Just posted this on the previous thread...
But assuming we don’t go 4-0 and go 3-1
We need at least one of the following to happen:
Atlanta to lose 2 (@NO, TB, @MIN, STL)
Tampa Bay to lose 2 (@CAR, @ATL, SD, OAK)
or
Carolina to lose 3 (TB, DEN, @NYG, @NO)
…and…
Washington to lose 1 (@BAL, @CIN, PHI, @SF)
if we do run the table take a game off for each team.
by Cosby Sweater on Nov 30, 2008 8:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Well, if this team really really wants to win a Super Bowl....
then we should be able to win these four. Easier said than done, I know. But we don’t have much of a choice at this point. We count on other teams to lose, and they all freaking win.
That’s what we get for blowing 4 NFC games.
Come and whisper in my ear, give us dirty laundry - ESPN
by Nelson... on Nov 30, 2008 8:55 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
It is a serious challenge
and our secondary worries me a lot but the Giants laid out the blueprint last year. IF this team is truly hungry and really wants that ring, time to bring the A game to pittsburgh and never look back.
by Billito on Nov 30, 2008 9:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think with Pacman coming back and Jenkins getting healthy
It won’t be long until one of them are playing right corner. And once that happens, the only weakness is at SS, which we should be able to cover, its not like we’re the only team with a marginal starter somewhere in the secondary.
"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee
by BigDinSC on Nov 30, 2008 9:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude, is your avatar Drew Henson?
Where will you be when the Sixers hoist the Larry O'Brien trophy? Hopefully Liberty Ballers.
by jsams on Nov 30, 2008 9:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey give Henry some love
You know Henry is getting the same treatment that Kevin Smith got when Deion came. If you were the other team who would you throw the ball at Newman or Henry?
by dallasfansince75 on Dec 1, 2008 5:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Atlanta, Freaking Atlanta?
Going into this season I didn’t think we would be fighting Atlanta for a wild card spot! What a crazy game. I have no doubts we will make the playoffs! I mean they haven’t even played thier best games yet. Go Boys!
by rocj55 on Nov 30, 2008 9:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm with Nelson and Billito on this one.
Our ultimate goal is the Super Bowl and we’re going to have to beat teams just like these 4 to get there, so might as well start not. Not to mention the fact that we’re going to have to win on the road.
If this team plays up to their potential they can beat anyone in the NFL. One game at a time guys. Pittsburgh here we come.
Where will you be when the Sixers hoist the Larry O'Brien trophy? Hopefully Liberty Ballers.
by jsams on Nov 30, 2008 9:15 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Another Blog pointed out a sceneraio under which Dallas, Tampa, Atlanta and Carolina can be 12-4 and Dallas missing the playoffs. This has Tampa winning its division by beating Carolina and losing to Atlanta. We lose the tiebreaker to Carolina and Atlanta.
by CBfan on Nov 30, 2008 9:31 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don't see 'em all being 12-4.
That’d be ridiculous.
Where will you be when the Sixers hoist the Larry O'Brien trophy? Hopefully Liberty Ballers.
by jsams on Nov 30, 2008 9:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
more than ridiculous... impossible
They play THREE games amongst themselves, so at least one of these teams will have 5 losses. Minnesota, the Giants and New Orleans (twice) should also help add to the losses. Mathematically, at least one team will have 5 losses.
Duane Thomas, Calvin Hill, Tony Dorsett, Emmitt Smith ... and now BOTH Marion Barber and Felix Jones
by DalaiLuke on Dec 1, 2008 5:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
my bad...
Carolina does not play Atlanta… they could, mathematically, all end up at 12-4
The Cowboys likely need to win AT LEAST 3 of 4 to make the playoffs. Given the current scenario, an 11-5 team could easily miss out. I believe it’s happened in the AFC recently, so don’t be surprised if it happens again.
Duane Thomas, Calvin Hill, Tony Dorsett, Emmitt Smith ... and now BOTH Marion Barber and Felix Jones
by DalaiLuke on Dec 1, 2008 5:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The math possibility of 3 teams from the South going 12-4:
Tampa now 9-3: loses to Atlanta, beats Carolina, SD, Oakland
Atlanta now 8-4: Beats Tampa,NO, MN, Rams
Carolina now 9-3: loses to Tampa, wins Denver, NYG and NO
I am not saying this will happen. But if it happens, Dallas will be sitting home even with 12-4!
by CBfan on Dec 1, 2008 6:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it won't happen
all three teams won’t even be 11-5
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Dec 1, 2008 7:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A Dallas Cowboy Quarterback
has not led the NFL in passing since 1979. If Romo does so (although I’d say chances are slim considering the defenses he has to face the last four weeks) that would be just another feather in his cap.
Speaking of caps, did anyone see that hat he was wearing at the post-Seattle game press conference? And the thick gold chain? Is Jessica dressing him or something? I had to turn it off, I didn’t want my kids to see what their hero #9 was wearing.
by DavidH22 on Nov 30, 2008 9:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Romo need a makeover
what is with all the gold chains and hats? Is he hoping to become a 70s porn star after his QB career? All he’s missing is the mustache.
by Cosby Sweater on Nov 30, 2008 9:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I really think Dallas has to go 3-1 at the very least
and the one loss cannot be to one of the NFC teams, Giants and philly..
by Deke on Nov 30, 2008 9:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
This week at Pittsburgh is huge.
Where will you be when the Sixers hoist the Larry O'Brien trophy? Hopefully Liberty Ballers.
by jsams on Nov 30, 2008 9:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Every game is huge in December
Cowboys fan since 1978.. I was 3 years old
by Mullin on Dec 1, 2008 2:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Really Offensive
As one of the coaches and others here have said “We will go as far as our offensive line will take us.” The Cowboys will live and die by the offensive line. And, no one ever thought there would be a 3 way tie for the Big XII South Either, but some computer put OU in the championship game.
by GunsUp on Nov 30, 2008 9:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The BCS really needs to be blown up.
That is no way to determine a Conference Champion OR a National Champion.
Come and whisper in my ear, give us dirty laundry - ESPN
by Nelson... on Nov 30, 2008 10:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If all the networks got together and demanded a change in the system
then you’d see some sort of playoff, but unless that happens, I wouldn’t count on a playoff system anytime soon, The current system is a joke…
by Deke on Nov 30, 2008 10:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Would a playoff really help?
Wouldn’t we have as much arguing about who makes the last couple seeds?
by Cosby Sweater on Nov 30, 2008 11:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, even if you could debate the last few seeds
At least you wouldn’t have undefeated teams on the outside anymore, and in a situation like this year, Texas, Oklahoma, and Texas Tech would all get a crack, rather than just one, when they are 3 of the top 6 teams in the country in terms of talent.
"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee
by BigDinSC on Nov 30, 2008 11:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Besides, it makes college football interesting and gives it a human element.
But although I’m against it, I would like to see a playoff just so I don’t have to hear about it anymore!
Whatever, Roll Tide! I can’t believe the situation Bama is in, I wasn’t counting on anything from them this year. I don’t honestly think they can hang w/ Florida’s offense, but if they can keep it lowscoring and grab a turnover….
by Realist Larry on Nov 30, 2008 11:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
SEC has a built-in formula for three-way ties.
The lowest ranked team of the trio (Texas Tech in this case) is taken out of the equation and whoever owns the head-to-head between the two remaining teams get the nod. I guess the geniuses who run the Big XII lacked the foresight to install such a tiebreaker.
by MadMick on Dec 1, 2008 1:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But that's why a playoff would be better
If three teams finish tied atop the best conference in college football, isn’t it logical to deduct that all three of them should get some chance to prove themselves? Also the BCS makes late season losses more important than early season losses. USC is ranked higher than Penn State for no other reason than their loss occurred earlier in the season.
"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee
by BigDinSC on Dec 1, 2008 1:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Pitt's Defense
has not allowed any opponent to reach 300 yards of total offense this season.
I suspect that Flo will have some trouble with their OLBs. Flo often struggles against speed rushers, and they have good ones. Columbo a bit as well. Their corners can be beaten though. So if we can give Romo time, we’ll have a good chance.
Likewise, their oline has been average at best. We should be able to pressure Rothlesberger.
The game will be won in the trenches. Who can protect better?
by Ridgelake on Nov 30, 2008 10:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
We'll likely see much more of Romo's escape tricks.
Come and whisper in my ear, give us dirty laundry - ESPN
by Nelson... on Nov 30, 2008 10:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
DELUSION
First of all PLEASE let the division go. I think there are those who still harbor illusions. Win the rest of your games or you will likely be out. I think the ’Boys will take a hard hit next week in Pittsburgh.
by Jinks on Nov 30, 2008 10:36 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
December
since before the season started many have said the true test of this team will come in December, where we have faltered in recent seasons. Now December is here. And it is not only a test of how well we are playing heading into the playoffs, but whether we make the playoffs at all. These four games will measure the worth of this team. We are heading December playing well. Now it is time for the December swoon to end.
by scottmaui on Nov 30, 2008 10:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
agreed
I think the current circumstances could work in our favor.. This team is forced to be hungry..
Everyone has to step up from the top down.. This Pittsburgh game is about to be a dawg fight..
"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"
by Wmillion on Dec 1, 2008 1:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A win in pitt would propel us to the playoffs
all 4 games are huge but getting this win in pitt would really do the trick…The confidence a win a pitt would give this team cannot even be calculated…hugeeee…lets hope for the best
by canty99 on Nov 30, 2008 11:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
More than talent of Pittsburgh
I hope this team is ready to get smacked and to smack back. The style of football Pitt and Balt, and also the Giants to an extent, play is going to be a real adjustment for the Boys.
They’ve had a stretch of games, and the bye, where, except for Wash., they really haven’t been challenged. Not just by playing untalented teams, but in not really having a team that will try to intimidate and bully them.
I hope Witten is healthy, we’ll definitely need Barber more than ever, and that Columbo brings some of that attitude!
And if we get a sack, I want to see Rothlisberger thrown down like we mean it. Doesn’t it seem that almost all of our sacks are so polite, the QB falls in slow motion? I’m not talking penalties, but please, strip the ball, fall on the guy, make it hurt! A “Haley” sack instead of the normal “Ware” sack!
by Realist Larry on Nov 30, 2008 11:36 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
As far as the zebras are concerned, any impolite sack is a penalty.
I think the Steelers are much more capable of running the ball against the Cowboys defense than the opposite is true. This is one defense Barber isn’t going to be able to bludgeon. The key will definitely be forcing Roethlisberger into turnovers and not just sacking him but stripping the ball when the opportunity presents itself.
by MadMick on Dec 1, 2008 1:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Rams, Dude...
Is going to cost us in the end.
~Texas Massacre 08~
by TheHeat on Dec 1, 2008 1:44 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
so you predict we will not make the playoffs?
wow
Duane Thomas, Calvin Hill, Tony Dorsett, Emmitt Smith ... and now BOTH Marion Barber and Felix Jones
by DalaiLuke on Dec 1, 2008 5:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
IF Dallas...
Can manage to at least 3 games, then no.
~Texas Massacre 08~
by TheHeat on Dec 1, 2008 3:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I Meant...
If they manage to win at least 3 games in December.
~Texas Massacre 08~
by TheHeat on Dec 1, 2008 3:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Rams game wasn't even close
It’s the Cardinals game I wish we had back.
by Cosby Sweater on Dec 1, 2008 8:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
one play in that game I wish we had back
The missed block cost us Romo and McBriar..
"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"
by Wmillion on Dec 1, 2008 11:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's not the play I want back ...
The one I want back is the MISSED FG in regulation!!!
Stop the Madness - Enshrine Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
by Raul Villaronga on Dec 1, 2008 1:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Whodathunk?
In the end, it was Folk that cost us.
In-YOUR-endo
by accidental innuendo on Dec 1, 2008 1:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I Prefer...
To have back that kickoff TD return that Dallas gave up in the beginning of the game.
~Texas Massacre 08~
by TheHeat on Dec 1, 2008 3:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Friggin ST killed Dallas in that game.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Dec 1, 2008 3:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
good point..
"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"
by Wmillion on Dec 1, 2008 6:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
To paraphrase the great Mel Renfro, circa 1970
“I’ll take 12-4 and let them shoot at me.”
There’s no way the Cowboys miss the playoffs at 12-4. If they do it would be the greatest injustice in the history of the world…okay, maybe not that bad, but still.
Even missing the playoffs at 11-5 would suck. How many 11-5 teams have ever missed the playoffs, expecially with the latest expanded version of the playoffs? All I can think of is the 1985 Broncos.
Of course, if the Cowboys stumble to a 2-2 or 1-3 finish, then they really don’t deserve to make the playoffs.
by DavidH22 on Dec 1, 2008 6:28 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget Washington
They have a very easy schedule. @ Bal, @ Cin, @SF, Phil @ Wash. They could run the table on those and end up 11-5. Dallas needs to win all 4 and take the mystery out of things. Considering remaining game schedules for all the teams ahead of us and Washington, this does not look good.
by StillHateTheGiants on Dec 1, 2008 7:25 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Easy?
That is interesting because I think they are going to drop two of those, to the Ravens because the Skins can’t score against an average defense and really won’t be able to score against the Ravens. And I think they will lose to the Eageles for a similar reason, they can’t score enough to even come close to scoring enough to win that game. Which is awesome because that means 9-7 and takes them out of the picture completely. Now we just have to worry about the NFC South.
First to six!!!
by sduncan24 on Dec 1, 2008 8:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Is that in order, because phi plays wk 17 @ phi against dal
I also doubt they have three road games in a row.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Dec 1, 2008 8:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's out of order
Here is Washington’s remaining schedule.
@BAL, @CIN, PHI, @SF
by Cosby Sweater on Dec 1, 2008 9:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
BAL will beat them
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Dec 1, 2008 12:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"I'm out of order?"
You’re out of order! The whole court’s out of order!
8^)
Stop the Madness - Enshrine Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
by Raul Villaronga on Dec 1, 2008 1:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We’re in this mess because we lost to St. Louis. The other loses count, too, but we had no business losing to St. Louis.
by ym on Dec 1, 2008 7:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
We can rightfully fault the players, but this "mess" starts at the top
It was the organization that decided the Cowboys could go into a SB run year with a totally incompetent backup QB. It was also the organization that decided Brian Stewart should be allowed to be the D Coordinator. For the knee jerk reactions about this always being Wade’s defense, explain to me why it has improved so much since he actively took it over. I’m also not sold on J Garrett or Wade. Tony Sparano should be the head coach of this team.
by StillHateTheGiants on Dec 1, 2008 7:44 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Agree 80%
Not having an adequate backup QB bit Dallas in the behind. That was inexcusable considering all the backups were bad from the very beginning, way back in TC. Dallas had plenty of time to correct that, but for whatever reason they chose not to address it.
2nd and 3rd on the list of beefs with the coaching are: Bruce Read being left in charge of ST, and the failure to reduce Stewart’s role as DC quicker. They should have put Wade in charge of calling the defense much earlier.
I’m still a Garrett fan, and think he’s done a good job for the most part, with the exception of the 1st WAS game.( It’s hard to imagine looking back at that game, that a healthy Felix Jones stood on the sidelines and got zero carries. )
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Dec 1, 2008 1:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Garrett has potential
He’s brilliant at times, or at least he was last year. I blame his faults mostly on inexperience. To your list I would add not using Choice more since Felix went down and forcing the ball to TO too much. I think TO intimidates him.
by StillHateTheGiants on Dec 1, 2008 3:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The rollercoaster keeps rollin
and my sanity keeps slippin.
by sublimezg on Dec 1, 2008 8:11 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Even if Dallas finishes 11-5 they could miss the playoffs…
It’s not probable but it is mathematically possible.
Here’s how…
The NFC south ends in a 3 way tie w/ Carolina, Tampa Bay and Atlanta all finishing 12-4.
Atlanta wins out beating New Orleans, Tampa Bay, Minnesota, & St. Louis
Tampa wins 3 out of 4 beating Carolina, San Diego, & Oakland while dropping one to Atlanta.
Carolina also wins 3 out of 4 beating Denver, NY Giants, & New Orleans while losing one to Tampa Bay.
The team I’m rooting for to fail is Carolina. All 3 of their loses are in the NFC and any 4th and 5th losses they might have would also most likely be in the conference. So if the Cowboys drop one to say Pittsburgh a subsequent tie w/ Carolina would be theirs due to a better NFC winning percentage.
It almost makes my head spin just trying to figure out all the various scenarios. The best solution is for the ‘boys to just win out and finish 12-4, (and none of the remaining games will be any tougher than this Sunday’s).
Honestly, even as a fan I have to take this thing one game at a time from here. I certainly hope the ‘boys are doing the same.
by gee-roj on Dec 1, 2008 9:11 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
11 wins will get Cowboys in the playoffs
There is no way 3 NFC South teams will all finish with at least 11 wins, it won’t happen.
I personally think Atlanta will tail off looking at their schedule. I see a 2-2 finish for them at best.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Dec 1, 2008 9:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Need to win them all to be sure.
The dooms day scenario above would result in Dallas missing the playoffs even if they went 12-4. A 12-4 team has never missed the playoffs in the NFL and it will not happen this year. The fact that it is possible after 12 games speaks of the competitiveness of the NFC wildcard race.
An 11-5 NFC team missing the playoffs this year is not that unlikely; in fact there are decent odds that it happens in the NFC this year. If Atlanta wins 3 out of 4 then they are going to take a spot. All that takes is one more upset by a team that has been producing upsets all year long. Even if Carolina and Tampa both lose two games and Dallas only loses one then there will be an 11-5 team missing the playoffs. The good news is, in that case the team would be Tampa Bay. If Tampa Bay also wins 3 of 4 the 11-5 team missing the playoffs would be Dallas.
I hope the NFC south teams keep wining and the Cowboys win them all. It would not be a bad thing if Dallas needs a win in Philly to make the playoffs. As Rafael has pointed out, this team does not perform well when they are the front runners. They go in on a seven must-win game streak and no one other then Cowboys fans will want to see them come playoff time.
by Trey, on Dec 1, 2008 11:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just worried about Pittsburgh
They are coming off a huge road win over a tough NE team and they have been scrapping all year long. The cowboys had better leave it all out on the field because if they lose in Pitts, I don’t see them making the playoffs.
I know it is mathmatically possible, but getting beat up in Pitts would make this team crumble whereas a big win would be a huge boost and help them regain all of their swagger.
Big one this sunday!!
by Billito on Dec 1, 2008 9:31 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
not true at all
Of all the games the Cowboys can afford to lose, it would be the Steelers game simply because it would be a loss out of conference which would hurt us they least.
If they lose to Pittsburgh and win their last 3 games, they would still make the playoffs at 11-5, no doubt.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Dec 1, 2008 9:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
All the games count Terry......
Conference or non-conference. Remember strength of schedule could come into play when deciding if we make the playoffs. I told you our poor conference record would hurt us and it appears it will if it comes down to a tie.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on Dec 1, 2008 10:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
conference games count for tie breaking purposes
thats why beating the GMen and Eagles is more important. Cowboys then need to beat EITHER Pittsburgh or Baltimore, not both.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Dec 1, 2008 12:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed that it could be a loss that would be easiest to let go
However, Terry, the Cowboys don’t play each game in a vacuum. And if they lose this one, who knows what the effect will be on the players’ psyche. And of course the media will pile on saying that it’s the beginning of another December swoon.
It’ll be tough, but they gotta win in Pittsburgh.
In-YOUR-endo
by accidental innuendo on Dec 1, 2008 10:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's what I'm saying
Forget the math, if they can’t win this game sunday, they aren’t going anywhere this year.
by Billito on Dec 1, 2008 12:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
With all the injuries, I don’t know if the team has enough to recover if they lose to Pitt.
In-YOUR-endo
by accidental innuendo on Dec 1, 2008 12:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Just heard Wade
Doesn’t sound like Jenkins will be able to go this week.
Ware sounds like a go and will practice.
ughhh…..he didn’t sound confident MB3 will be able to go this week.
Austin sounds like he will need another week.
PACMAN is back!!!…. Wade said he will be a go this week.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on Dec 1, 2008 10:22 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Nick just came from practice
Ware and MB3 didn’t practice. Ware might wear a knee brace this week. Austin was rehabbing on the sideline.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on Dec 1, 2008 11:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Anything can happen
We need a little luck and a lot of grit and wins to get in this year. The odds are against us getting in but there is a chance. Keep on playing for that chance, one game at a time. Sure does make for an interesting year.
by torchindefenses on Dec 1, 2008 10:40 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
WE are good team..
We need choice on his A game blocking..
"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"
by Wmillion on Dec 1, 2008 11:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I watched all of the Steelers-Pats yesterday...
and Pittsburgh didn’t impress at all. Yes, they won on the road in crappy weather against a decent team, but the score was deceiving. NE gave that game away in the 2nd half with turnover after turnover (NE committed a turnover the last 4 times it touched the ball). Pitt was only able to score it’s 2 second half TDs because it got the ball inside the 10 twice due to turnovers. It was a tie game at the half, and NE moved the ball in the first half, but it’s receivers got a serious case of the dropsies – Moss dropped several balls, including a sure TD, and Gaffney dropped a sure TD as well.
The Steelers O-line is a sieve, at least from a pass-blocking perspective (although they are pretty good run-blockers). Their WRs are shaky outside of Ward – their TE Miller is probably their best receiver. They had great difficulty moving the ball against a very banged up NE defense with one of the worst secondaries in football. Now, it is true that the Steelers D is a beast, especially the run D. But we can move the ball on them through the air – NE could have easily put up 24 yesterday, even with all of the turnovers, if not for dropping two sure TDs. If we can protect Romo and take care of the ball I think we’re a better team.
by DannyWhite on Dec 1, 2008 12:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
absolutely, Pittsburgh can be beat at Heinz Field
GMen did it, Indy did it and the Chargers, who stink, only lost by one point.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Dec 1, 2008 12:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I seriously hope we go in there and win.
Come and whisper in my ear, give us dirty laundry - ESPN
by Nelson... on Dec 1, 2008 1:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
really?
The Steelers are probably the best team in the AFC, if it’s not the Titans.
It was windy and rainy, and that is why there were turnovers and poor tackling. Many of the turnovers had to do with Pittsburgh LBs pounding the S out of Cassell. Those aren’t gifts. They were forced.
Go ahead, expect this to be a walk through a daisy meadow. You’re going to be disappointed.
by Joey2zs on Dec 1, 2008 1:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I completely disagree with you.
The Steelers defense is a monster. A lot of those Patriot turnovers were caused by the Steelers D. The cowboys are going to have a hard time doing some of the things they like to do this Sunday, especially if Barber can’t go.
by gee-roj on Dec 1, 2008 1:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I have confidence in Tarshard
He was the main guy at GT and did rather well. He can carry the load for one game if required.
by quincyyyyy on Dec 1, 2008 2:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Never said they weren't a monster...
in fact, I called the Steeler D a beast above. We will have a hard time running on them, no doubt. But we should be able to throw the ball on them unless the weather is terrible. And yes, the Steelers D “caused” 3 of those turnovers, but they didn’t cause the game-changing one, which was the muffed KO return that started the ball rolling. And they didn’t really cause the last one, which was just a very poor throw by Cassel who wasn’t even under pressure at the time. I guess you could argue that they “caused” it by the jittery feeling that Cassel was probably feeling at the time, but hopefully Romo can avoid that sensation. The middle two turnovers they caused are a bit troublesome – both were sack-fumbles caused by Harrison. One was a blitz, and one was a straight 4-man rush where Harrison beat Matt Light like a rented mule.
Like I said – if we can protect Romo and take care of the ball we should win. I don’t think Pittsburgh is going to be able to put many points up on us unless we give them a short field. If we can shut down the running game on 1st and 2nd and force them into “& long” situations, then we should be able to take advantage of their pass-blocking deficiencies. They were only able to muster up one long drive against a banged up NE D that can’t cover anyone, and I don’t think they can move the ball consistently against us.
The key, probably, is going to be how well our pass-blocking holds up against the standard PItt rush package. They were getting pressure with only 4 rushers yesterday – much like the Giants – so they could still drop people into coverage. If we can stand up to the 4-man rush and force them to have to bring extra rushers to try and get to Romo, then we should be able to make some plays. Hopefully our line play has been solidified now that Procter is out and Holland is in.
by DannyWhite on Dec 1, 2008 2:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not totally sold on Dallas’ pass coverage right now.
For one they haven’t really played anyone over these past 3 games. The Redskins offense is abysmal right now and Seattle is even worse. San Francisco should have been up 14-0 in that game and a better team would have been.
Further more, Jenkins won’t be playing this Sunday and Ware most likely will not be 100%. I’m mostly concerned about them getting off the field on 3rd down because the longer they’re out there the harder it will be to stop the Pitt running game.
Pittsburgh also had plenty of drops in that New England game and the weather was a huge culprit in that. But regardless of how it was done they did a great job of ball control in that 2nd half, and held a team that had scored 31 & 48 points in their previous two games, (with over 400 yards passing in each) to just 10. In fact their opponents have reached 20 or better in 4 games all year and in their last 3 games the opponent has been held to 10 each time.
by gee-roj on Dec 2, 2008 10:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Would love to see H. Ward try one of those cutback blocks on Demarcus Ware, only to have Ware light him up
ala Ray Lewis / Houszmanzadah
by DieSlowKeyshawn on Dec 1, 2008 1:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hines is still tough but not as fast as he once was
I was wondering if we could stick Henry on him, Newman on Holmes and Scandrick/Pacman on Washington to start the game.
But you’re right, Ware would eat him up.
In-YOUR-endo
by accidental innuendo on Dec 1, 2008 1:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I basically just said that
to bring up convo regarding that hit. You expect these linebackers to be blindsided by skinny WRs running at full stem, not Ray-Ray, absolutely destroyed TJ at the last second yesterday. Between that and the Steelers hit on Wes Walker, wow… what a day.
by DieSlowKeyshawn on Dec 1, 2008 1:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's what we need
Players that can put the fear of god into runty WRs like Santana Moss. That’s what Roy Williams used to be able to do.
In-YOUR-endo
by accidental innuendo on Dec 1, 2008 2:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Najeh Davenport?
Just released by the Steelers for the 3rd time this season. Sounds like Barber MAY HAVE (don’t jump down my throat) to sit out this weekend, I think it makes perfect sense to sign Davenport, he can provide “trade secrets” about his former employer while spelling Choice and helping out with KR as he has experience there as well. Check out my fanpost.
by DieSlowKeyshawn on Dec 1, 2008 2:15 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
i like it.
make it so
I commented. You're welcome.
another transplant from The Blue & Silver Report
by bulldog jeeper on Dec 1, 2008 2:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Right? Saw the headline on espn, I think it makes perfect sense
Especially since we are playing them THIS WEEK. Bring him in, have him tell us EVERYTHING he knows about an organization that has treated him like crap this year! We’ll have a whole week of extra game planning thanks to him and of course, spell Choice and help on Kick Returns.
by DieSlowKeyshawn on Dec 1, 2008 2:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i do, however, worry about agreeing with you...lol
most of the time we’re on different ends of the spectrum
I commented. You're welcome.
another transplant from The Blue & Silver Report
by bulldog jeeper on Dec 1, 2008 2:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Understood.
A lot of people have a beef with me due to how I react (admittedly sometimes extremely) to injuries. This is a byproduct of this 2008 team and the spin machine that is Coach Jerry Jones and company. combined with our lack of injuries luck in 2008 (minus Glenn and Ellis.)
With that being said, the earlier Jerry signs him, the better! I’ll be on the Najeh high horse all week! If Marion looks good tomorrow though, I’ll let Coach Jones pass.
by DieSlowKeyshawn on Dec 1, 2008 2:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the advantage Romo brings to the table against pittsburgh
is he is used to playing in cold weather. I’m not too considered about the weather, as long as there is no precipitation.
I don’t think our D needs to do anything exotic on sunday, since there o-line is sub par. We just need to focus on covering their receivers and for the front seven to beat their man, which I think they should be able to do.
Our O on the other hand is going to need to establish the air attack early, which is usually hard to do in cold weather, but like I said Romo should be able to do his thing in cold weather and for that matter Roy Williams after playing in the NFC North for so long. And for the run game I think it might be a good idea to run those swing passes we saw so much of against the Redskins, as I don’t see us successfully running up the gut against this team.
by quincyyyyy on Dec 1, 2008 2:19 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wes Welker
Got lit up by Ryan Clark yesterday
Cowboys fan since 1978.. I was 3 years old
by Mullin on Dec 1, 2008 3:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
If the Oline plays well......
Dallas should score plenty of points, even against Pitts. Bennett has emerged and Roy Williams seems to have some timing with Romo. It’s just not possible to match up with so many weapons. 3 wide, 2 te, 1 rb. pick your poison
by StillHateTheGiants on Dec 1, 2008 3:19 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Agree with you
The biggest concern I have about this game is James Harrison vs Flo. If they keep Romo fairly clean, they should win. He’s probably going to need to move around more than normal for that to happen.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Dec 1, 2008 3:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Weather will be a factor
Weather.com indicates a few snow showers in Pittsburg on nine of the next ten days. Too bad the game is not on Wednesday.
- I know, i know…10 day weather reports are not worth the bits they are written on
by Trey, on Dec 1, 2008 10:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
it will definitely be cold 30-35 degrees
whether we’ll see snow or not is still up in the air, no pun intended.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Dec 2, 2008 8:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















