Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


spread the word

Film review: Defense, Cowboys @ Giants

Here's the first part of the Film Review as promised. This time I start with the defense because that was much more interesting. Why? Because they were on the field so much in the first half, giving me more plays to work on and also because the QB situation really threw off a lot of the evaluation of the offense. I will be doing the review of the offense later.

NT - Jay Ratliff is still pretty active but he isn't making as many plays as he was earlier in the season. Rat was having some problems holding the point of attack in the running game but part of it was the scheme where the one-gap 3-4 defense asks him to slant to a gap in one direction. There were plays where the line over-pursued and the Giants RB's were easily able to cutback and pick up yards. Jay also had an offsides penalty, and a missed tackle that hurt. Only once did he get serious pressure on the QB. The Cowboys also made a huge mistake on a third and 17 play where they only rushed three and dropped Ratliff into coverage on Derrick Ward. There was no way he could keep up and the Giants converted the play. That was bad defensive philosophy. It wasn't Jay's best game. Equally troubling is the lack of production from Tank Johnson. He got a defensive holding call and was in on a few tackles but the only true positive was his one QB pressure.

DE - Another area where the Cowboys defense is getting limited production. When they are at their best they at least shutdown the run game, but they eventually gave way in that area in this game. Marcus Spears was a total non-factor and was even getting moved out occasionally on single blocks. If he isn't commanding double-teams in the running game then the Cowboys defensive scheme breaks down. Teams are free to double up on the NT's and blow open holes. Chris Canty was almost as bad and actually gave up a lot of playing time to Stephen Bowen. Canty did have a sack but it was a gift given to him by the pressure of Kevin Burnett on a blitz. He made a couple of decent tackles in the run game but overall he and Spears are just not creating any disruptive plays from their positions. They don't have to rack up the stats, but they need to at least command double-teams or get penetration into the backfield. On play after the play the front three (DE, NT) were getting stood-up at the line of scrimmage.

Stephen Bowen got a lot of playing time in this game and had a few good moments against the run by penetrating the line and helped out on some tackles in the run game. He also got a QB pressure. But it wasn't anything spectacular. Jason Hatcher has regressed to the point that he's not really bringing anything to the table. The play of the front three, including the backups, has been very disappointing recently (except for the Tampa By game), only Jay Ratliff is active enough to make a real difference in games.

OLB - DeMarcus Ware still remains a force on our defense. I got him down for a couple of QB pressures, one sack and forced fumble and one fumble recovery. He also forced a holding call on a run play and made a few good stops in the run game. But even he wasn't immune to sloppy play; he missed a few tackles he normally makes and he got caught over-pursing inside on a run and left the outside wide open. In the grand scheme though, he was active and did what he could to hold the defense together. Greg Ellis has been a disappointment and this game was no different. The only significant play he made was reading a screen quickly and tying up the running back forcing the QB to throw the ball away. He was beat in coverage by the TE once, but he actually didn't play that much as his time went to Anthony Spencer. Spencer was extremely active in this game and was very disruptive. He got penetration in the run game, clogged up running lanes by taking on a TE or FB, got a QB pressure forcing a holding call, and made a few tackles. It wasn't all good though, he missed an easy tackle, got called for offsides, and was very slow getting his drop into zone coverage on a play that went for good yards. But he and Ware were the few guys who actually made a difference on the defense.

ILB - Bradie James racked up a lot of tackles in the run game, managed to get a sack on a blitz and recovered a fumble. Statistically it was a pretty good effort. Missed tackles though marred his effort and he couldn't cover the TE to save his life. His play was one-dimensional, going forward against the run he made plays, otherwise he wasn't helping the defense. Zach Thomas also made a lot of tackles against the run and penetrated the line for a stop in the backfield. The Cowboys actually blitzed him a few times in the game but he was unable to get to the QB. He also got caught over-pursuing the play on a TD run. Kevin Burnett got pressure on a blitz that caused a sack and he also caused a fumble but the Cowboys couldn't recover it.

CB - Anthony Henry played OK and was better than I've seen him recently. He only got beat a couple of times on pass plays and had a nice tackle on a hitch route. For once, he didn't seem to be the CB the other team was picking on. Mike Jenkins' play consisted of extremes on the spectrum. He made the pick-six that got the Cowboys back in the game briefly, had a couple of tight coverages when the ball came to his guy and made a great tackle on a third and short play stopping the first down. But he also got beat on a deep crossing pattern for a long gain, gave up a TD from the bunch formation where confusion reigned, and made the much-noted and highly-debated non-attempt at a tackle of the last TD run. He also gave up a first down on a third down play.

Orlando Scandrick had a good night except for one notable exception. He was rarely thrown at during the game and had good coverage most of the time when the ball did come his way. He also had a good tackle on a run when he was blitzing. But against the bunch formation he also gave up a TD with some soft coverage and hesitancy about where he should be. Alan Ball was playing the slot the few times I noted his play and the results weren't great. He gave up an easy first down and got called for a illegal contact in the secondary that gave a first down.

S - Ken Hamlin was the culprit on a couple of missed tackles though he did end up with a few tackles and showed good hustle running down one play. He also got called for illegal contact in the endzone but he Giants declined the penalty because they scored anyway. Keith Davis actually played a good game and was very active. What I really liked is that even at the end of the game he was giving maximum effort. He filled the holes nicely on quite a few runs and made good tackles. He did have a missed tackle on a TD run but overall played well. Courtney Brown just doesn't show up much in the game. He did over-pursue on a big run (seems to be a common theme with the defense for the game) and gave a pretty poor effort on a TD run. Pat Watkins only showed up on a punt coverage play which was actually pretty good.

An extra note concerning the defense as it relates to special teams. I love Nick Folk when he kicks FG's but the depth on his kickoffs are a problem. Almost all his kicks in the game were short, starting at the 5-yard line or further out. For instance, when the score was 28-14 and the Cowboys were hoping for a defensive stop to get back in the game, Folk's kickoff went to the 15-yard line and the Giants returned it to the 33-yard line to start their drive that eventually ended up in a TD. That certainly doesn't help the defense and it didn't help them all day.

The Cowboys defense also had crappy production on third down giving up a high conversion percentage. They just couldn't make the stops when they really needed it.

0 recs | Comment 38 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The front 3

These guys always look great in the beginning of games, which shows how important ball control on offense is. I haven’t been paying much attention to Canty, but does anyone see if he is losing leverage because he’s so tall; is he playing too high?

I’d really like to see Rat at End with a rotation of Tank & Spears in the middle. If Bowen is solid against the run, we can expect to see more of him on 1st & 2nds.

Re: Zach—He doesn’t see to be effective on blitzes, but he’s really good in coverage. Surprised he hasn’t got a pick yet.

George Teague did it all.

by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on Nov 5, 2008 11:30 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1 Big

Ratliff is clearly a 3-4 DE. I wish they would make the switch and move Spears out.

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 5, 2008 2:44 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Grizz, do you see that the performance

was a result of poor effort or poor execution of mainatining their gaps. You mentioned a few missed tackles so does that mean you feel that their tackling was adequate and maybe they wore down later in the game? Or do you feel that they might have checked out due to the ineptitude of the off?

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Nov 5, 2008 11:53 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I did not

rule that out but I did not want to make the assumption that overpursuit meant that they were putting forth good effort. I do not feel that effort was an issue.

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Nov 5, 2008 12:28 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

cowboys78, I don't think it was necessarily an effort problem

although the missed tackles become more numerous towards the end of the game. It did look like they wore down against the run. Part of the problem I saw in the game was poor gap responsibilities, that sometimes happens when guys get too aggressive and are trying to make plays instead of remembering where they’re supposed to be on a given play,

by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on Nov 5, 2008 2:15 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thank you for

the reply, your response is on the same page with how I feel that they played. Towards the end I just felt that they had nothing left in the tank and it mirrors what wade said about being too aggressive and paying for it late in the game. I just wanted to get your take.

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Nov 5, 2008 2:18 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You know. Wade talked about that

after the St Louis game. It’s remarkable that they haven’t gotten it fixed yet but I guess we can always hope the bye week will do it.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Nov 5, 2008 5:56 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

3rd down stops

This was a problem for the defense last year. I haven’t felt confident in this team to consistently get stops on 3rd downs in a long time. Is it scheme and/or personnel?

by WestTxHornFan on Nov 5, 2008 11:55 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think it's a combination of both

sometimes guys aren’t making plays, but I think we’re being too passive in some third down situations.

by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on Nov 5, 2008 2:16 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Right

I loved your comment about dropping guys back in coverage and rushing three. My 15 year old is now legally deaf because of that play…

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Nov 5, 2008 5:57 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Great Write-up

Is very clear Tank, Spears, and Canty either don’t fit our scheme or are not very good football players.. I think Tank is 4-3 DT. Not sure what Spears and Canty problem is..

Looks like DL and OL will be biggest needs come this off-season.. Tank will not be back..

"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"

by Wmillion on Nov 5, 2008 11:58 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We are definitely going to need a major overhaul of our d-line this offseason

I’m glad we decided not to sign Canty long term. Remember when Wade kept on saying Canty was disruptive… What the heck was he talking about?

by quincyyyyy on Nov 5, 2008 12:34 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We need a true NT that's one problem

I still think Canty would be a good 3-4 DE if he had a good NT next to him. On the other side It doesn’t matter who Spears has next to him because he clearly doesn’t get the job done.

My fantasy DL lineup for 2009:

Spencer OLB

Ratliff DE

NT??……..probably a FA or Rookie. I would’nt be against giving Spears a shot. I agree, Tank is gone. He seems to be better off as a 4-3 DT.

Canty DE

Ware OLB

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 5, 2008 2:50 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I have to agree

Tank was money, next to Tommie Harris. Tank plays better when someone else is the stud.

"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"

by Wmillion on Nov 5, 2008 1:42 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

at least we did not overpay for him

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Nov 5, 2008 1:46 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If the talent on this team

really is overrated, it’s definitely on the defensive side of the ball, especially the DL. Except for Ratiff, I think the this entire unit needs to be blown up during the off season.

 We need to draft or sign a quality DE and NT and move Rat back to DE, his more natural position. Spears, Canty, Bowen and Hatcher can fight it out for backup spots.

Also, I like all of our LB except for Barbie Carp, but we need to bring in a lot of LBs as well next season.

It’s a shame we traded away that 1st rd pick, we sure could have used all the picks to stock pile more front 7 talent because we lack LB depth and our starting DEs are busts.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 5, 2008 12:52 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yes blew it up..

You can say what you want about coaching, but these guys can’t beat a one on one block..

"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"

by Wmillion on Nov 5, 2008 1:45 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Tank is a 4-3 DT, Spears is a 4-3 DE, as is Hatcher and Ellis. Carpenter is a 4-3 OLB, as is Burnett. James is beginning to look like a 4-3 MLB. Ratliff is either a 3-4 DE or a 4-3 DT. These guys are all outstanding football players (yes, even Carp) who are not being used correctly.

I think Norv had quite a point when he told Jerry he didn’t think we had 3-4 personel.

by fivetwos on Nov 5, 2008 12:52 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Spears is definitely not a 4-3 DE, he is too fat; the guy just sucks

Hatcher just sucks, and Ellis is getting old. I and I agree with you about Tank, Carp and Burnett. James is a 3-4 ILB.

by quincyyyyy on Nov 5, 2008 12:56 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Disagree about James....he is average at best and we need better..

I think he more or a 4-3 LB. He is not a 3-4 ILB. He get’s pushed around way too much and can’t shed blocks. He is horrible against the pass which was evident in the Giants game. If there a overrated player in the starting LB core it is Bradie James and has been for some time. We need to draft a impact 3-4 ILB because James is not it…..

Don’t worry Terry we will have a first round pick because Jerry will have 11 drafts picks to move up. I will say if we finish 8-8 like I predict, we would’ve had a pretty high first round pick. The Lions will be dancing on their heads if that happens……lol

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 5, 2008 2:58 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the point is

Jerry shouldn’t have to trade multiple picks to move into the first rd. We need more than just one or two new players on this defensive front 7.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 5, 2008 3:18 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No sense crying about it Terry, it's done

Like everyone has pointed out already we weren’t getting a Wr with Roy’s talent and ability with a first round pick. Jerry wanted a legit starter that can come in right away, not a rookie. We needed a WR to compliment TO. You know it, Jerry knew it. That’s why he pulled the trigger. Crayton was not getting it done as a #2 Wr. 11 picks won’t make the team next year so the ideal thing to do is package them and move up. I would rather have 4 good players that make the team than 7 or 8 mediocre ones.

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 5, 2008 7:12 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I disagree

Crayton was fine as the #2 WR, we need better players on defense as our front 7 simply isn’t getting it done.

as long as Romo is under center, our offense is fine.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 5, 2008 10:21 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We have plenty of picks

Plus we will have some room to make moves if we don’t bring Canty back.

"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"

by Wmillion on Nov 5, 2008 7:37 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m not on the Wade-must-go-wagon, but if that happens, I’d like to see a 4-3 coach come in and use Ware and Spencer at DE, Ratliff and Tank at DT, Burnett and Carp at OLB with Thomas at MLB. By then Zach can be more of the vocal leader an MLB should, which is apparently too much for James to handle.

by fivetwos on Nov 5, 2008 1:12 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I like the sound of that too

I used to think people who said we should move back to a 4-3 were foolish; I’m starting to rethink my position on that matter now.

by quincyyyyy on Nov 5, 2008 2:03 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My thoughts

I think we should use the bye to experiment with the DL. Move Rat to end (I’m salivating at the pressure problems that could be presented with Rat lining up next to DWare and Spencer rushing from the other side.) Either move Spears to NT or bench him. Maybe experiment with Tank at end or NT next to Rat. I’m at a loss for what to do with Canty as he showed so much promise last year.

I’m concerned that maybe some of these guys are playing out of their natural position (i.e. Rat should be at end.) From what I remember of Tank, he was a force on the Bears DL, so obviously he’s got the talent. I mean, perhaps he’s playing in the wrong scheme (3-4 instead of 4-3) but maybe try him at end. There seems like there has to be something the coaches can do to get these guys to live up to their expectations, there is too much talent for them to be playing so poorly.

"So you can’t stiff arm at all? What about the throat?"- Marion "Barbarian" Barber

by DC_fan on Nov 5, 2008 1:19 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rat to End is the easiest fix for this group

I don’t understand why they don’t do that. Start Tank. He’s fresh. He’s barely played. In Chicago, he never came outta the game. Maybe he plays with rhythm. Spears can back him up.

On the other end, keep rotating Bowen and Canty. Someone will produce.

This is all in vain because Wade just will not make personnel changes, but morphing a 3-4/4-3 is not that hard. Any of us can draw up the lineups and any of us can choose when to deploy which.
Seems that the defense is sooo concerned with the secondary that the only adjustments in the playbook are with the nickel and dime Ds. You know what? We won’t need those alignments as much if our front 7 was playing as a complete group, instead of just the LBs.

Roy is gone. We got new blood on the corners. It’s time to fix the front line.

George Teague did it all.

by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on Nov 5, 2008 1:34 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

At least Wade is finally giving Spencer more playing time

And I think we’ve missed Roy a lot this year in run support.

by Mandmeisterx on Nov 5, 2008 2:34 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

for sure

Roy is definitely missed. He will be back next year.

"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"

by Wmillion on Nov 5, 2008 3:06 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah

Don’t see as many arm tackles or people just trying to throw shoulders…

by ChrisRichey on Nov 6, 2008 1:50 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You also see a lot more people running for over 100 yards too

That only happened once last year, in the throw away game against the ’Skins.

by Mandmeisterx on Nov 6, 2008 7:00 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

Especially when they were experimenting with Ratliff at DE in training camp. I will say that we could see Spencer start in place of Ellis from here on out.

Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!

by Boyzfan94 on Nov 5, 2008 3:00 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Tank

has too many off plays at NT. We need a consistent mountain in the middle.

by accidental innuendo on Nov 5, 2008 3:02 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Terrellowenstonyromo_small
The True Area of Concern
Small
Food for thought
Jessica_simpson_tony_romo_main_small
Romo vs. December
Jessica_simpson_tony_romo_main_small
Romo vs. The Clutch
Profile3_small
For Tarheel Paul...

Recent FanPosts

Bitty-p_small
Playing Philly Twice...
Jessica_simpson_tony_romo_main_small
Wade vs. The Secondary
Stewie_small
Steve McNair dead
050_small
Tarheel pauls family
Small
Tony, Tiger and Me
Picture_6_small
Marvin Harrison rumor — Really? Again?
318039_small
Let's Put Our Heads Together Re: Ed Werder
Pirate2_small
Romo vs. Woods vs. Boehner

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Editor

Profile3_small Dave Halprin (Grizz)

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Michael_irvin1_800_small Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88)

Me70s_small Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31)

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Smile_small Jim Vance

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports