Switch to 4-3 BTB petition
Another poster got me thinking, I think this little 3-4 experiment should be over. It's not that I don't think it's a good scheme; it can be an excellent scheme given the right players, but I don't think we have the right players, however. It's time for a change, and I think Garrett when he becomes head coach would agree as well. He has spent so much time around 4-3 D's that I would hope that he might have a preference for them.
Here is how I see our new front seven panning out:
Spencer Tank Ratliff Ware
Carp Thomas Burnett
Any co-signers?
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
2 recs |
99 comments
Comments
no
"You can be a leader or follower.... Or you can be elite...." - Me
by miles on
Nov 5, 2008 2:49 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
i think that if we switched it would be ellis at de and ware at olb over carp
by jack dein on
Nov 5, 2008 2:55 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
forget Carp
unless you want our defense to become more of a sieve than it already is.
Bradie James has to play OLB in that scheme.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 5, 2008 2:58 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm loathe to switch back to the 4-3 exclusively
Because I honestly think it puts our best players in the best positions to make plays. But I think we are doing ourselves a disservice by not bringing it out occasionally during the game. It’s clear some of our defensive players have deficiencies in the 3-4. It wouldn’t hurt to try them out at the 4-3 at certain points in the game.
by accidental innuendo on
Nov 5, 2008 2:59 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
I wouldn’t be against it because there are players on this team that are more suited as 4-3 players. James, Zach, Tank, Spears are not 3-4 players. Spears and Tank would be ideal 4-3 DT’s.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Nov 5, 2008 3:29 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
wait a sec...
correct me if im wrong, but wasn’t Zach in a 4-3 with Miami for all those years?
by AikmanNailedMySis on
Nov 6, 2008 7:24 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think they switched to a 3-4 the last couple years he was there.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 6, 2008 10:53 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't think that we necessarily need to switch to a 4-3
But I do think something need to happen with the front 7. We either need to blow it up and bring in lots of new personnel or blow it up and switch everyone around.
"So you can’t stiff arm at all? What about the throat?"- Marion "Barbarian" Barber
by DC_fan on
Nov 5, 2008 3:00 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Middle Linebacker?
We simply don’t have a middle linebacker that could excel in a 4-3. Sure Bradie and Zach have both played and been somewhat productive in a 4-3 what we need is a more dynamic defense with all the athletes we have. The problem is not the 3-4 but what we’re doing with it.
The whole point of a 3-4 defense is to disguise where the pass rush is coming from. We rush the same 4-5 guys all the time from all the same spots. We need to get more creative with our scheme and more aggressive. That has nothing to do with 4-3/3-4.
by D Rock 76 on
Nov 5, 2008 3:03 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Zach could but he's getting long in the tooth
I say we draft Scott McKillop from Pitt. I’m a season ticket holder and watch every game and this kid is simply a tackling machine. Unlike Jenkins, when a player is anywhere near this kid, he’s going down and hard.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 5, 2008 3:08 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah I think I saw somewhere he had a 150 tackles last year
Don’t know if I recalled the stat correctly, that seems really high.
by quincyyyyy on
Nov 5, 2008 3:11 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
no, you're right, he did
He averages well over 10 tackles a game. He’s fun to watch because he loves to hit people and he can actually tackle guys with great technique.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 5, 2008 3:21 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think we're going to see a lot more disguise
We’ve already seen a bit more CB blitzes and safety blitzes with Hamlin since Wade got more involved.
Also, and I might be crazy, but it seemed like there was a bit more pre-snap motion on D for the Tampa game. Didn’t notice as much against the Giants.
Plus, I think Spencer being a lot more involved is really gonna help. We’ll get a strong youthful guy who’ll be what Ellis used to be: great pass-rusher who’s also great against the run. Ware has always been good against the run on his side so if our linemen step up, we may be able to clamp back down on run D again. We’ll sure find out soon enough.
by KaceOFbass on
Nov 5, 2008 5:43 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Creative Pass Rush?
we don’t know the meaning of the phrase. Isn’t that what Wade was supposed to bring to this highly vaunted 3-4? Maybe they have gotten the wrong players for this scheme, but they do have the right players for a 4-3, I’m sure of it. If this 4-3 can’t pressure the quarterback consistently and effectively, it needs to be scrapped for the Cowboys original defense, the 4-3. Something tells me our personnel is designed for a 4-3.
"Amongst the enemy's Liar, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on
Nov 6, 2008 8:21 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
not that it matters
but i think you mean lair…
by 325424 on
Nov 9, 2008 1:59 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jenkins...
…missed tackle may have looked worse than it was. Especially on a low motion replay. I don’t know. I couldn’t see what he was looking at, but maybe he was actually being disciplined and holding his lane (for once on this whole team). If he collapsed on Ward, and got juked, Ward would’ve had the whole sideline to walk in anyway. Just trying to look at it from another angle that I haven’t heard anyone mention yet. The inside help was WAY late getting to that lane.
by D Rock 76 on
Nov 5, 2008 3:13 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
+1 kinda
I actually thought the same thing when watching it, and your right, him holding that lane was good defense …. but the thing was once he was close enough to close in on ward, he never even took a step at him. That is what bothers me, it was almost like everything else on this defense, so overcoached that they no longer play with instinct and fire, but are trying to think the whole time.
by cowboyfan on
Nov 6, 2008 9:43 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Silly suggestion
No offense, but this is one of those “seems like an obvious silver bullet to fans” suggestions that is totally ridiculous. For one thing, the linemen in a 4-3 and a 3-4 use totally different techniques in the base defense. It’s not just a matter of arranging and rearranging bodies, it’s a matter of how they engage blockers, how they rush, how they hold lanes, etc. It would be the equivalent of saying “TO and Roy are big receivers well suited for the West Coast offense, and Romo’s quick release is WCO friendly, so let’s switch mid-season to the West Coast offense!”
It doesn’t work that way.
by TimSchultz36 on
Nov 5, 2008 4:01 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't assume
I didn’t mean that we would change now. This off season would seem like a good time to switch.
by quincyyyyy on
Nov 5, 2008 4:05 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, not a silly suggestion Tim....
It’s nice to talk about puristic Philosiphy on the differences between the 4-3 and the 3-4, but the reality of this Dallas Cowboys team is that they have taken MANY players from a 4-3 and converted them into positions in a 3-4 and coached them on the fly. It’s not like the players in question never played in a 4-3 and are unfamiliar with the assignments and responsibilities. In fact, it is the reverse- they have a lifetime of experience in the 4-3, and are more unfamiliar with the 3-4 and have needed time to get acclimated. I don’t consider changing from a 3-4 to a 4-3 as being anything like the analogy you used in regards to the west coast offense though, simply by merit that we really aren’t talking about having offensive deficiencies. Don’t you worry, our offense will be the most lethal there is VERY shortly.
"Amongst the enemy's Liar, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on
Nov 6, 2008 7:29 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It could work
DT: Tank, Ratliff, Spears
DE: Ware, Canty, Spencer, Ellis
Weakside OLB: Burnett, Barbie
Strongside OLB: James, Spencer
MLB: Thomas, James
by Squishmytomato on
Nov 5, 2008 4:05 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I personally feel that Jerry is committed to the 3-4
I think Parcells influenced him that it was a better scheme than the 4-3 which is why he hired Phillips in the first place.
I seriously doubt he’ll s@#% can it now, no matter who he hires in the off season and for all those who want Cowher as our next HC, if that happens, he’s a 3-4 guy as well.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 5, 2008 4:17 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
Someone needs to keep things consistent year-to-year.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 5, 2008 4:25 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I prefer the 3-4
because I’m a big fan of LBs. I do think that a hybrid version of the 3-4/4-3 would be great. Here are some other 3-4 D-lines:
The Ravens
DE Ngata 6’4" 345—yes, Ngata plays End now
NT Bannon 6’3 310
DE Price 6’5 295
The Browns
DE C.Williams 6’4 320
NT S.Rogers 6’4" 350
DE S.Smith 6’2 325
The Pats
DE T.Warren 6’5" 300
NT V. Wilfork 6’2" 325
DE Seymore 6’6’ 310
Our beloved Cowboys
DE Canty 6’7" 304
NT Ratliff 6’4 302
DE Spears 6’4" 315
Each of those teams have 2 pretty good playmakers on their D-line and each has one HUGE, FAT dude that can make plays. The other guys are more athletic. Rat is an athletic playmaker with a motor, and Canty can be sometimes.
Maybe we should be petitioning for Spears to move inside—or else bye bye 1st rounder.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 5, 2008 4:24 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I think they rotate Ngata from DE to NT
Because I just saw a Ravens game and he was in at NT on alot of plays. We need a 6’4 340 lb. NT in our defense. That’s what missing.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Nov 5, 2008 7:03 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nose Tackle....
The foundation of a 3-4 scheme is the big, beefy NT. I love Ratliff and Tank, but against the run we need that big body in the middle…..
by thejanusman on
Nov 5, 2008 8:00 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We had one...
…and we traded him to Miami cause we figured Ratliff and Tank could do just as well or better.
by KaceOFbass on
Nov 5, 2008 8:48 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, I'm really regretting him leaving now
At the time, it seemed like a good move because his contract was pricey, and Rat did such an admirable job filling in.
by accidental innuendo on
Nov 6, 2008 5:48 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
Fergie coulda really helped this year.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 6, 2008 10:54 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fergie is 6'4" 305 lbs.....not exactly beefy either...or any beefier than what we have...
Of course it was me who brought up us aquiring Shaun Rodgers from the Lions, or Kris Jenkins from Carolina…and was soundly shot down by 95% of the BTB faithful…..hmmm…both are up for ALL Pro/Pro Bowl considerations and surely would have made a major difference here at NT….Ratliff and Johnson are NOT 3-4 NT’s…and there won’t be any high quality replacements coming here anytime soon…….oh well……
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
"If you don’t take him off the field as a coach, he will just about die out there," Jerry Jones said. "That impacted my decision. It’s a Michael Irvin-type work ethic. That’s what we are talking about with Felix Jones."
- Owner/G.M of the Dallas Cowboys , Jerry Jones
by BoyzRback on
Nov 7, 2008 4:55 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
Ratliff and Johnson are NOT 3-4 NT’s
I couldn’t agree more with that statement. They had something going in training camp with Ratliif at DE and Spears at NT. They shouldn’t have hesitated and rolled with it the first game of the season.
Fergy may be only 305 lbs., but he played alot heavier.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Nov 7, 2008 10:37 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fergie is built more compact
whereas Ratliff, who plays alot like LaRoi Glover, looks more lean and Tank looks kinda tiny at NT.
It’s not always about what the guy is listed at in the team program.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 8, 2008 11:23 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Baltimore is a hybrid defense.
They give the offense so many different looks.
by houseofprime on
Nov 5, 2008 8:51 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1, but also...
They’ve had the same core of guys on that D for a long time. And OF COURSE I want my defense to be like the number one defense in the league haha
by AikmanNailedMySis on
Nov 6, 2008 7:33 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you forgot San Diego
"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"
by Wmillion on
Nov 6, 2008 5:39 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and Pitt
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 8, 2008 11:25 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm a 3-4 guy
and hope we never change, just continue to get better personnel at certain positions. I think with some of the guys we got, 3-4 or 4-3 wouldn’t matter, they just aren’t playing well.
by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on
Nov 5, 2008 4:33 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
well said Grizz
just look at the very best defense in football, the Stillers, they have run the 3-4 since Cowher was there and during the years Dick LeBeau was their DC, their defenses have always been, year in and year out, among the very best defenses in the league.
Hell, Tomlin was weened on the 4-3 cover 2 defense, but he was smart enough not to mess up a good defense.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 5, 2008 6:00 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey Grizz...
I don’t agree with you Grizz… Respectfully, though. Why?
Simple- I like the 3-4, but it can’t work well the way our scheme is. alot of times we go after a qb on 1st and 2nd down and they have incompletions. Then on 3rd they back off and then there is a completion for 10-20 yards (1st down for the other team)
Is this what the 3-4 is all about?
We can’t win with a 3-4 that consistently let’s teams get yards running the ball up the middle, no matter how much you tell me Bradie James is good against the run
My personal assesmet goes as follows-
Bradie James seems hesitant alot, waits for the play to come to him, rather than go after the play and smack it down before it develops. He lacks the speed to catch up to a play most of the time after he lets it develop. And also i notice that he is not good at all against the pass. We don’t really need LB’ers that are one-dimensional, especially if we are running a 3-4. The linebackers have to be able to do everything well.
Our NT’s, although good D-lineman, are not the NT for a 3-4 D. Tank is a DT in the 4-3, and so is Spears. Ratliff is playing out of position in our 3-4, because he is an awesome DE in the 4-3. Ware would be the other DE.
Our LB’s would be Spencer SSLB, Thomas as MLB, and Burnett. Bradie James would back up Zach Thomas in the 4-3.
That’s how I believe our team should be on Defense on the field right now. I believe it would be a nightmare to play against our defense when it is set up this way, because we would be utilizing our talents to the FULLEST POTENTIAL.
"Amongst the enemy's Liar, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on
Nov 5, 2008 10:05 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
agreed…
rat tank spears ware
spencer zach burnett
newman jenkins/orlando
henry hamlin
sickness
by CowboysFan4Life on
Nov 6, 2008 9:37 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No way Spencer could play OLB in a 4-3 scheme
He’s definitely a DE.
by Mandmeisterx on
Nov 6, 2008 10:03 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ok...good point
rat tank spears spencer
burnet zach dware
god thats scarey dware and spencer on the same side
by CowboysFan4Life on
Nov 6, 2008 1:30 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bradie James =OVERRATED!
He is a below average 3-4 ILB. As much as I like Zach he is also not a 3-4 ILB. Until we get two ILB’s that can play the 3-4 those positions will be inconsistant. The only thing that may help them is if we had a big 3-4 NT.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Nov 6, 2008 10:31 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
James is a great run defender
but a poor pass defender, whether that makes him overrated, I’m not sure.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 6, 2008 10:40 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He's great in run defense 6 yards downfield. Sure, he's a tackle machine,
but all of his tackles are after the runner gains significant yards. ILB’s in the 3-4 have to attack and make plays. They can’t let the play come to them. Everytime you see James, it’s him chasing a play down and tackling from behind. I just want to see the guy step up and fill some gaps.
by Mandmeisterx on
Nov 6, 2008 10:53 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bradie would have to play the SAM in a 4-3
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 6, 2008 10:56 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree
if we could find a massive NT who commands double and triple teams and let Rat move.. Rat would dominate if he was blocked one on one all game..
"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"
by Wmillion on
Nov 6, 2008 5:55 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Then we'll be seeing that Beast Slam Dance more often!
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 8, 2008 11:26 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Flex Flex, Flex! Oh Landry do you hear me?
by bad knees on
Nov 5, 2008 6:33 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
dude thats such an archaic defense
this just proves your as old or older than I am, lol.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 5, 2008 6:58 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well, ya I am a old fart!
I still remember when the Cowboys were a real team.
by bad knees on
Nov 5, 2008 7:15 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
thats was only 13 years ago
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 5, 2008 10:12 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
3-4 effin sucks
4-3 is the best kind of defense. 3-4 is for sellouts.
Jindal '12
by Longhorn on
Nov 5, 2008 7:37 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
thats why the best D in the league is a 3-4
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 5, 2008 10:13 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Any post that has Barbie Friggin Carpenter as a potential starter, and thinks this improves are defensive situation goes completely ignored...
i’m out..
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
"If you don’t take him off the field as a coach, he will just about die out there," Jerry Jones said. "That impacted my decision. It’s a Michael Irvin-type work ethic. That’s what we are talking about with Felix Jones."
- Owner/G.M of the Dallas Cowboys , Jerry Jones
by BoyzRback on
Nov 5, 2008 9:38 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, the Steelers 3-4....
Works because of Casey Hampton. Chargers Defense works because of Jamaal Williams (NT), and the Patriots Defense works because of Wilfork (NT), and the Ravens defense works because of they’re nose tacklle. But why does they’re 3-4 defenses work well and ours just okay to bad? simple- nothing agains Rat and Tank, but they ain’t big enough to take on 2 blockers at the same time consistently and power them. I’ve always said Spears should be our NT because he is the only one that takes on 2 blockers effectively, but he’s small too. Go look at the size of all the NT’s the other teams that run a 3-4 have compared to our NT size. This 3-4 of ours is doomed to failure until we do something about that and Bradie James in the middle. Teams beat us by running up the middle- just think of what Portis did to win that first Skins game. If teams can’t run the ball up the middle, it’s over for them. If they can run the ball, it’s over for us. I want the 4-3 to come back because no one has the courage to speak out against this comical version of the 3-4. That is why I want the 4-3, not because I am against the 3-4- I’m not. But until one of the coaches steps up and actually does something about it, we will just keep going along and say “oh well, things will get better” and they won’t. Put Campo as D coordinator and run a 4-3, and watch the pressure on the QB’s make them wilt and through alot of incomplete passes, and teams won’t be able to run either. Either that, or get a big NT and put him in there to clog up the middle if we stay with 3-4, but this damned indecisiveness is killing us on D.
"Amongst the enemy's Liar, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on
Nov 5, 2008 9:39 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
no, the 3-4 Steelers D works because of Dick LeBeau
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 5, 2008 10:14 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No Terry...
Dick Lebeau is just a great defensive mind in the 3-4, and he knows the importance of that big beefy take on 2 blockers type nose tackle that we don’t have, and without such an animal (well put, eh?) then he can be mastermind all he wants, it won’t matter, cause a good offensive line would control that smaller NT and be able to get 3-5 yards every time. But Terry, I will give you that he is a mastermind so that is why they have a player like that to begin with!
"Amongst the enemy's Liar, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on
Nov 6, 2008 7:36 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
all I know is when he has been their DC
they’ve had great defenses and when he went to be the HC for the Bengals several years ago, their defenses sucked until he was fired at Cincy and came back to become their DC again, then their defense was among the league’s best again.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 6, 2008 7:51 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If anyone knows anything about the 3-4 Dick Lebeau is the Godfather of it....
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Nov 7, 2008 10:38 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
If Rat is doubled, then that pretty much nullifies our DLine.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 6, 2008 10:57 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't agree with you Grizz...
Respectfully, though. Why?
Simple- I like the 3-4, but it can’t work well the way our scheme is. alot of times we go after a qb on 1st and 2nd down and they have incompletions. Then on 3rd they back off and then there is a completion for 10-20 yards (1st down for the other team)
Is this what the 3-4 is all about?
We can’t win with a 3-4 that consistently let’s teams get yards running the ball up the middle, no matter how much you tell me Bradie James is good against the run
My personal assesmet goes as follows-
Bradie James seems hesitant alot, waits for the play to come to him, rather than go after the play and smack it down before it develops. He lacks the speed to catch up to a play most of the time after he lets it develop. And also i notice that he is not good at all against the pass. We don’t really need LB’ers that are one-dimensional, especially if we are running a 3-4. The linebackers have to be able to do everything well.
Our NT’s, although good D-lineman, are not the NT for a 3-4 D. Tank is a DT in the 4-3, and so is Spears. Ratliff is playing out of position in our 3-4, because he is an awesome DE in the 4-3. Ware would be the other DE.
Our LB’s would be Spencer SSLB, Thomas as MLB, and Burnett. Bradie James would back up Zach Thomas in the 4-3.
That’s how I believe our team should be on Defense on the field right now. I believe it would be a nightmare to play against our defense when it is set up this way, because we would be utilizing our talents to the FULLEST POTENTIAL.
"Amongst the enemy's Liar, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on
Nov 5, 2008 10:02 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Good post, but I think it has a flaw
You write:
Simple- I like the 3-4, but it can’t work well the way our scheme is. alot of times we go after a qb on 1st and 2nd down and they have incompletions. Then on 3rd they back off and then there is a completion for 10-20 yards (1st down for the other team)
Is this what the 3-4 is all about?
The problem with that statement is we generally don’t run the 3-4 on third down passing situations, we run what is considered a version of the 4-3 because we use 4 down lineman. More precisely, it’s a 4-2-5 or 4-1-6 depending on whether we bring in a secondary player to play the hybrid LB/SS position. So our problems on third down actaully come against a modified 4-3.
Those 4-down lineman are generally Ware, Canty, Rat/Tank and Ellis. We do rotate in other guys there also.
I don’t like the idea of playing Spencer as an OLB in a 4-3. That would force him into coverage way too often which is not his strong suit. He needs to be attacking the QB as much as possible, he was a DE in college and that is what he’s best at. I also don’t like having DeMarcus Ware as a down lineman DE, this puts him in position to be engulfed by tackles and TE’s on double teams and limits his freedom to move his attack angles around. Because he would be extremely light as a down DE, he could have trouble in the run game and his superior speed could become less of an advantage.
by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on
Nov 6, 2008 10:38 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree
we shouldn’t have 4 down linemen on 3rd downs, we should still be in the 3-4 and zone blitz like the Steelers, there is a reason they have the best defense in the league and it’s certainly not because they have the best 3-4 talent.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 6, 2008 10:43 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There LB's are alot more talented which makes them alot better
James Farrior and Larry Foote are a heck of alot better ILB’s than Bradie and Zach
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Nov 6, 2008 10:54 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Keep in mind they also have Lawerence Timmons as a ILB and he aint no slouch...
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Nov 6, 2008 10:55 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and Lamar Woodley
was a monster draft choice—a real linebacker, not a switched up DE.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 6, 2008 10:59 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
oh yeah, I agree.....
He was all over the place the other night..
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Nov 6, 2008 11:00 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
thats not true
Steelers OLB make their 3-4 work, Farrior and Foote are very average players and certainly no better than James and Thomas.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 6, 2008 12:23 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Foote maybe,
but Farrior is outstanding. He even managed to be a really good player for the Jets before he came over. That, in itself, is an accomplishment.
by Mandmeisterx on
Nov 6, 2008 12:31 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Farrior is getting old like Ellis
His best days are far behind him.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 6, 2008 12:37 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They are good both
but they have and outstanding young ILB named Timmons also. There ILB’s are far and beyond better than ours. You need good 3-4 ILB’s to make the defense work. The problem is we don’t and it shows. Pitts ILB’s are all over the place as everyone saw on Monday night.
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Nov 6, 2008 1:03 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I personally don't think they're that much better
the difference is minimal. The Steelers OLBs are the players on that defense that fly and around and make the plays.
Harrison and Woodley are the real stud LBs on that defense who are the playmakers.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 6, 2008 1:20 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They are Terry...there ILB's were all over the place on Monday night
making tackles and getting sacks…..
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on
Nov 7, 2008 10:40 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
their numbers say otherwise
Tac Sks
Woodley 37 9.5
Harrison 51 10
Foote 29 1.5
Farrior 63 2
Ware 49 10
Ellis 22 3
James 55 3
Thomas 66 1
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 7, 2008 12:14 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This also shows that
perhaps Bradie is turning into a mighty fine pass rusher for us from the middle.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 8, 2008 11:27 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
A great scheme can beat great talent anyday.
by Mandmeisterx on
Nov 6, 2008 10:54 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry Grizz....
Never paid attention to whether they are in 3-4 or 4-3 on 3rd, just usually disappointed at the fact that they went to some sort of “prevent” and stopped putting pressure on the qb, and allowed a first too many times that it has almost become commonplace, and I am just an old Cowboy fan wanting to find an answer for this problem. I would not want to stop putting pressure on the qb (just the way I am), and the more pressure on the qb, the less likely he will complete a pass. Just look at the Giants super bowl victory and what they’re D-line did to Brady, and you’ll know what I expect.
True, maybe Spencer isn’t a good lb in the 4-3, but it’s not like the cowboys are lacking in personnel either. They are the one team that is the closest to being able to morph from 3-4 to 4-3, and if we had the defensive coach to implement such morphing, boy talk about confusing and giving the offenses alot of different looks. But I do feel that we would be able to run a 4-3 defense effectively, and we would be alot stronger team in the middle right now with the personnel we have running it than the 3-4 we run. We are getting killed by the running game.
Grizz, there was one theme to the Steelers Redskins game that shouldn’t go unnoticed to Cowboy fans, and it’s this…..
“Shut down Portis and they’re running game, and they don’t have anyone else to beat you, but if they can run on you, everyone else on they’re offense will get involved, and then it’s over”
That pretty what my take is, and I believe in it firmly. If we did that to Jacobs, then the Giants would have problems too.
"Amongst the enemy's Liar, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on
Nov 6, 2008 7:50 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
thanks Grizz...saved me alot of time writing that up to prove it's not the 3-4 that's killing us...
and that our personel changes wouldn’t quite cut it in the 4-3…
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
"If you don’t take him off the field as a coach, he will just about die out there," Jerry Jones said. "That impacted my decision. It’s a Michael Irvin-type work ethic. That’s what we are talking about with Felix Jones."
- Owner/G.M of the Dallas Cowboys , Jerry Jones
by BoyzRback on
Nov 7, 2008 5:06 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I cannot believe
That this post does not have a poll.
by accidental innuendo on
Nov 6, 2008 10:09 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
It's not too late to add one.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 6, 2008 10:59 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Those of you who watched the Pitt/Wash game
did you notice that their ENTIRE defense just looked super duper fast and was flying all over the place to the ball carrier, or at the QB.
We need a hustler guy like Polamalu that helps pick up the other guys’ game from the defensive backfield.
Without the Roy of old, this defense has continued to underperform. With the offenses of today, a playmaking Safety is a necessity for a top defense.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 6, 2008 11:03 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
The Cowboys
just do not have the NT to be a good 3-4 team. They need to address this issue in the off season.
by gee-roj on
Nov 6, 2008 1:10 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
+1000
yes, getting a true NT and moving Ratliff to DE would make the defense much better.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on
Nov 6, 2008 1:21 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dear Terry...
Even saying things like this gets me riled up, angry, upset, and miserable. Why? because we already know this about our 3-4 defense, went and got a very good 3-4 NT, and then let him go to Miami with the Tuna so they can run a 3-4 the way the Tuna wants too. We get Thomas in return, but he’s no 3-4 lb, don’t kid yourself. If we went to 4-3, he would be a great MLB in the 4-3.
You want to talk about just as dumb a move? Getting rid of Fasano, then picking a TE in the 2nd rd (nothing against Martellus) and not drafting a OG, NT, or ILB with the 2nd rd pick.
"Amongst the enemy's Liar, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on
Nov 6, 2008 8:04 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1001.....and I felt it was a major NEED going into the season...
Until we find an athletic 325lb+ monster in the middle…this defense will have deficiencies, and lack any sort of inside push or stoutness at point of attack…Ratliff would be awesome as a DE….
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
"If you don’t take him off the field as a coach, he will just about die out there," Jerry Jones said. "That impacted my decision. It’s a Michael Irvin-type work ethic. That’s what we are talking about with Felix Jones."
- Owner/G.M of the Dallas Cowboys , Jerry Jones
by BoyzRback on
Nov 7, 2008 5:10 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe we can move Bigg to NT.
Nah, he’s too tall.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 8, 2008 11:28 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe Jerry should be reading these BTB blogs
because we discussed the addition of a spaceeating NT during the offseason/draft time.
Fergie for a 6th round pick, who didn’t even make the team. Tsk, tsk.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31) on
Nov 6, 2008 4:20 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I do agree that Jerry got fleeced on the Fergie trade, and we should have gotten more for Fasano/Ayodele trade...
BUT….Fergie is old and expensive and coming off year long surgery…, and i’m glad he was given his walking papers to save money, and to develope our homegrown , younger talent……I’m not all to happy we took some of that saving and threw it at an old and expensive LT or CB, but that’s another story…If we had only traded for Rodgers or Jenkins…we wouldn’t even have this post !!!!!!!!
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
"If you don’t take him off the field as a coach, he will just about die out there," Jerry Jones said. "That impacted my decision. It’s a Michael Irvin-type work ethic. That’s what we are talking about with Felix Jones."
- Owner/G.M of the Dallas Cowboys , Jerry Jones
by BoyzRback on
Nov 7, 2008 5:17 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Our best players fit the 3-4 better than the 4-3
I thought about a switch to the 4-3, and while it would certainly help Rat, Tank, Burnett and Carp, it takes both Ware and Spencer and puts them into positions that don’t suit them. Those guys are prototype 3-4 outside lbs. And they happen to be our most talented front 7 defenders, so you build the defense to suit them. Put them at end, and they might do ok, but they’d be undersized. Our other stud front 7 guy is Rat, and I think he’d work fine as a 3-4 DE.
We need a fat bastard in the middle. I think if you tell Spears in the offseason to load up on the home cooking that he could come back at 340. He’s always battled his weight, lets just give him the green light. If you don’t recall, Ted Washington was a LB out of college! Can you believe that?
by cowboysuberfan on
Nov 8, 2008 11:01 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes, but....
Has our defense produced so far THIS year with our best players? Answer-No. Does our defensive coach have a hamdle on what to do when there is an injury- meaning does he use the right personnel? again, no. It’s got to be one way or another.
You are right about Spears Cowboyssuberfan, he is the only D-lineman that has the strength and speed to play the NT position for us. He is the missing element. He can take on 2 blockers at the same time effectively. If we were dumb enough to not go out and get Shaun Rodgers or Kris Jenkins to fill that role, then that is our best option. Ratliff is being utilized wrong by being NT. He is an exceptional DE in the 3-4.
So if we stay in 3-4, do something about nose tackle, make Ratliff go after the passer and not be a space eater NT, Replace James with Burnett full time, and get Spencer out on the field more. If not, then going back to 4-3 would be smart, since we wouldn’t have as many problems finding the right players for the right positions, since we already seem to have the personnel to do it. Oh, and the coach too (Campo), which may be more important than anything anyway, since Stewart and Phillips seem to be failing Cowboy fans with the Defensive gameplan.
"Amongst the enemy's Liar, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on
Nov 8, 2008 11:28 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs













