Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Penn State Recruiting Roundup Is Set For A Big Junior Day

Wade comes clean: I call the defensive plays

It seems as if the defense has been playing better as of late.

A few weeks back many people wanted Brian Stewart's head-on-a-stick. Wade stepped in and became more involved. But he did so in a way to help Stewart save face and avoid taking all the credit. He was intentionally ambiguous about his role and that drove the media nuts.

Well, he was a little more definitive today.

"Nothing has changed," safety Ken Hamlin said on Oct. 23.

Said Stewart on that day, "If I got demoted, I probably wouldn't be smiling. ... He will spend a little more time on the defense."

Now it's more than a month later, and Phillips admits he has been indeed calling the defenses. He calls what defense he wants to run to Stewart, who relays it to linebacker Bradie James on the field.

"I call all the defenses," Phillips said Wednesday afternoon.

But the agreed-upon lie back then was Stewart was calling the defense. Nothing had changed, etc.

"I said that during the week (after the loss to the Rams) that I was calling defenses," Phillips said.

No. He didn't. All he said was he was going to get more involved.

I guess no good deed goes unpunished. Seems like Wade just tried to handle it with some class.

Imagine the temerity!

Star-divide

Quick look at the playoff race.

Short version: we need to win. Period.

We need to make it happen like yesterday.

Tony Romo plays a game with reporters he can't win.

"Well, I have only two Decembers. This is my third one now. So I don't know if you can really have anything -- if I play about eight years and we stink in December every year, maybe we can talk about it.

"But the first year you are just kind of running around with your head cut off, you don't really know what is going on. When you are playing you are just playing. And I think we went, what, 2-2 last year. But that is also different. I didn't even play but a half in that last game. So I would like to think I had a winning record a little bit except for last year. And we have only played one game [this season] against a good team on the road. So it is what it is. People talk and they come up with stats and a few different things. But the reality of it is if you are a good football team and you are playing games that everyone is playing in, yeah, you will win."

I accept and agree with everything he's saying here. I don't necessarily think a 2-2 December is such a bad thing. And Romo hasn't been here long enough to authoritatively say he always has bad Decembers.

But that's not the point. The point is, you can't win these rationalizations. This is the same thing both Mannings, Steve Young and Aikman went through before they won the big game. It's the same thing McNabb goes through. If you address it, it seems like you're making excuses. The only way to shut people up is to win. That's the only way.

You've got better things to do with your time than to try and explain this rationally to reporters. They're not listening. You think this is going to stop them from asking these questions or writing critical columns? No sir.

Ok. I'm stepping down from my soapbox.

Boy the NFL Network loves to show us when we lose. In all fairness, it was a great game Sunday. (I don't want to spoil it for you but the last seven minutes left a bitter taste in my mouth. Like beer that's been sitting out in the sun for about a week). But I've been seeing replays of the debacle in Pittsburgh left in right.

I would watch the fourth quarter of this game at your own peril. Especially if your like me and you throw stuff when you get angry. But, I must admit, the Game of the Week presentations are always interesting. It's like a hybrid of "Inside the NFL" and classic ESPN highlights. I dig that kind of stuff.

This week the NFL Network is acting like a stalker because they don't know how to quit us. They're like Renee Zellweger in "Jerry McGuire" because we had them at hello. They're like Sanaa Lathan in "Brown Sugar" because ... well ... no reason. I just needed a reason to say her name because she's so fine (that restraining order was unnecessary Ms. Lathan!)

Here's the NFL Networks take on Romo's woes in December, our chances of recovering and how this could be a make-or-break matchup for Romo.

We're running that network.

Justin Tuck talks big and plays even bigger. He'll be in Irving Sunday and if the 'Boys want to run anything resembling a functioning offense, they'll need to block him.

Colombo. Time to earn that big paycheck you just got.

Marc Colombo is the new $22 million man on the Cowboys' offensive line. He must start earning his keep immediately.

The defending Super Bowl champion New York Giants visit Texas Stadium on Sunday, and they bring their NFL Defensive Player of the Year candidate, strongside end Justin Tuck.

At right offensive tackle, Colombo draws Tuck as his blocking assignment – and Tuck wasn't blocked very often in the first meeting between the teams in November. Tuck made a team runner-up six tackles, including 2 ½ sacks, as the Giants handcuffed the Cowboys' offense in a 35-14 romp.

I care about wins way more than statistics. But I do think it's neat that MB3 and T.O. are nearing 1,000 yards. I know the Emmitt and Irvin years spoiled us but there has definitely been years where we didn't have anyone close to 1,000 yards receiving or rushing. There were years when Richie Anderson and Troy Hambrick (just an aside: how weird is it that BOTH of those dudes got in trouble with the law?) were our prime rushing threats and Raghib Ismail and Keyshawn Johnson were oh so close to 1,000 but yet so far. Thank you football gods for delivering us from those days.

Like I said, wins over stats. But the desire to see players reach goals and your team win games is not mutually exclusive. You can wish for both simultaneously.

And I do.

I hope they get it.

They deserve it.

Comment 50 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Cowboys win and Atlanta loss would be great.

Even better would be if the Eagles somehow lose too.

by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 10, 2008 9:26 PM CST reply actions  

I don't really understand what Romo is saying.

Is he saying that his first season should be thrown out, and that his December record for last year should be 2-1.5, resulting in a winning December record? If so, he’s been hanging out with Wade a little too much.

Hey Tony, you’re 3-6 so far in December. Prove everyone wrong by having a 6-6 December record by the end of this year.

by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 10, 2008 9:54 PM CST reply actions  

lol

that is basically what he’s saying. it kinda makes sense in a way, but like Tuna says it just sounds like excuses. Win, Tony, Win!

by scottmaui on Dec 10, 2008 11:32 PM CST up reply actions  

What Romo said makes no sense.

Big time QB’s don’t make excuses and that’s what it sounds like. The fact remains in 3 seasons he has 4 wins out of 9 games in Dec and Jan. Stop creating turnovers and win the big games in Dec and Jan and you will stop the critics.

2009 Draft here we come........

by Boyzfan94 on Dec 11, 2008 12:47 AM CST up reply actions  

Oops, I missed one.

He’s 4-6 in Decembers, so far. They had 5 December games in ‘06. He’s also 0-2 in January.

But, if all goes well, he can end this season with winning records in both months: 7-6 in December and 3-2 in January, plus 1-0 in February.

by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 11, 2008 10:10 AM CST up reply actions  

So, once again, the opportunity is there for him.

I truly believe that if the Defense continues to play the way that they have been since Wade took control of them, all Romo has to do is not play poorly. Everyone is always bus driver this and bus driver that to denigrate what other QBs have accomplished, but if Romo had just been a bus driver this past Sunday instead of playing poorly, the Cowboys probably win easily. If he can curb his impulses and only take big shots if they are clear, while not making costly mistakes, the defense and running game should be able to carry us to a championship.

I guess part of that goes to Garrett, too. I still can’t believe that with some of the most athletic, physical receivers in the game, Witten, Owens, Williams, and Bennett, a reliable, ball control, run down the clock and move the chains passing game can’t be developed.

by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 11, 2008 10:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Romo did make sense

What Romo is basically saying is that he’s only played in TWO Decembers and you can’t judge a QB’s performance late in the season who has only played in TWO Decembers, it’s ridiculous.

If Romo has consistently played bad in Decembers over a period of years, then yes, its a legitimate argument, but to base your judgment over such a short time frame is extremely premature.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 11, 2008 2:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Of Course.

What are you Romo’s translater? We all understood what Romo was saying, we don’t need you to slurp every word and make it sound differently.

~Texas Massacre 08~

by TheHeat on Dec 11, 2008 4:38 PM CST up reply actions  

apprarently not

as some misguided fans thought it sounded like an excuse which it wasn’t.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 11, 2008 4:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Well

whether it was an excuse or not, he needs to prove us all wrong from here on out. Him and the whole team.

~Texas Massacre 08~

by TheHeat on Dec 11, 2008 4:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Is 2 going on 3 not a period of years?

Maybe Romo gave Wade that line about a bye being the same thing as a playoff win. Romo is not a rookie, Romo is not a 3rd year player; he is a 6th year player. Yes, we get that this is his 3rd year starting. Whatever. You have a losing record as a starter in December. Play better and fix it.

It’s so ridiculous that everyone always tries to explain away his reputation, when all he has to do is prove it wrong once. If I didn’t like people saying something about me, I would try my hardest to quit doing the things they are talking about. It’s not as if people are making things up, or just making predictions without basis. They are looking at what he has done in the past and using that as a predictor of what he will do in the same situation. One game into this December, they were right.

Now, all he has to do is have at least 4 good games in a row, hopefully 7, and people won’t say that anymore.

by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 11, 2008 5:33 PM CST up reply actions  

no it isn't, that is a very short time period

Romo sat the bench for 3 years, not the same as playing. Romo is just one player, if this was an individual sport, you’d be correct, but Tony needs other players to play well for the team to win, he can’t do it all by himself.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 11, 2008 8:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I dont want to be negative...........

But what if the cowboys dont make the playoffs. How many people in here would want to fire Wade? I’m guessing a lot. But im not sure i agree. Yes there are some things that Wade does and says that makes me scratch my head but this defense is just starting to come together. I mean, is it really Wade’s fault that Romo was a turnover machine last week or that he was stuck with Brad Johnson and a 3rd string qb that couldnt even make the Vikings roster? The Rams game, yes, i put that on Wade, he did not have his team ready to play that week. But Wade has had to deal with a lot of crap this year. The guy coached us to 13 wins last year (and yes i know we lost in the playoffs) and we are on our way to at least another 10 win season(i hope). I know we all have high expectations for our Cowboys and every year its Super Bowl or bust. But I think it would be a shame to have to start all over with a new head coach and especially a defensive coach who would more than likely want to bring in new position coaches. I just think the defense is really turning into to something special.

I wouldnt be shocked if Jerry fired him. In fact i kind of expect it. But i just wanted to see what the rest of you guys think. And don’t give me the lame stuff about how he doesn’t “light a fire under there butts”. Remember everybody, we had Bill here for four years, and he rode guys to the breaking point and we never won more than 9 games with him.

So lets here it……………

by TARHEEL PAUL on Dec 10, 2008 9:54 PM CST reply actions  

Why do you think he's now taking credit for the Defense?

If he wasn’t fearful for his own job, he wouldn’t bother coming out now and saying he’s the one calling the plays. But now that there’s a good chance that the Cowboys miss the playoffs, he’s making sure that everyone knows exactly what he brings to the table.

by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 10, 2008 9:57 PM CST up reply actions  

I understand your rationale here

But the only person that really matters to Wade keeping his job is Jerry. And I would think that Jerry is aware of Wade’s involvement each week. I really wish there was a way to keep Wade on as D Coordinator even if Jerry wants to go another way. And heck, if any owner was gonna pull a bizarre move like that, it would be ours.

"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee

by BigDinSC on Dec 10, 2008 10:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't buy that argument BPS

Who in the NFL thought Wade wasn’t calling the plays since the Rams debacle? It’s been pretty clear even to the fans, that something changed after that stink-bomb.

It’s a shame if he’s fired, because this is finally the defense we thought we’d see since he was hired.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Dec 10, 2008 10:02 PM CST up reply actions  

shouldn't he...

… be fired for allowing the defense to be absolutely terrible?? I mean, if all he had to do was pay closer attention to the defense for it to improve as much as it has, and he spent half the season with a sh itty defense paying it no mind… well, shouldn’t he be fired for being asleep at the wheel?

by Joey2zs on Dec 11, 2008 12:57 PM CST up reply actions  

That's the tough part

It is infuriating that he let it get so bad before anything was done, but on the flip side, he has the unit playing so well now, that it would be a shame to start over with someone else running them.

"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee

by BigDinSC on Dec 11, 2008 4:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I Agree

He should stay as the D coordinator. But honestly I don’t see anyone that grabs my attention to be headcoach next season. It’s best to leave Wade as HC.

~Texas Massacre 08~

by TheHeat on Dec 11, 2008 4:41 PM CST up reply actions  

The thing of it is,

Wade was one of the few HC’s in the league who wasn’t calling plays on offense or defense. Almost all coaches do.

by Mandmeisterx on Dec 11, 2008 5:23 PM CST up reply actions  

That part is frustrating, I guess he was trying to get Stewie the cred to remain as DC...

in the event Wade stepped down or was fired.

Jerry should have told him to take over much earlier. So in that regard, I can’t see how the owner/GM can fire him for finally taking the reins and getting the defense to play up to expectations.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Dec 11, 2008 8:09 PM CST up reply actions  

You could be right on Baked...........

But Jerry knows all. So he has known all along who is calling plays and who isnt. If you’ve never noticed, when they show him in his luxury suite during the game there is a guy sitting beside him wearing head phones, im sure he’s listening in on the play calling.

by TARHEEL PAUL on Dec 10, 2008 10:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Bill Pacells won 10 games with a garbage of a heap of a roster

He didn’t have a franchise QB, he changed the system from a 4-3 to a 3-4, he reorganized the scouting department. You think he would do a better job with the more experienced talent on this team now, I didn’t like how he micromanaged, but he would have this team playing better than it is

by Deke on Dec 10, 2008 10:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think he ran a 3-4 in 2003

but I may be wrong…I think he started the 3-4 in 2004, and their defense was gawd-awful.

by DavidH22 on Dec 10, 2008 10:06 PM CST up reply actions  

yes he did run the 4-3 for the first two years here

then he switched to the 3-4 but it takes three years to get the players in place and comfortable to play in the 3-4, it just doesn’t happen over night

by Deke on Dec 10, 2008 10:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Your right, my mistake, he did win 10 games with a ton of crap his first year........

But he also won 6 games the next year with the same ton of crap. So in my mind its a wash. And who on this current team is such a big playmaker that wasn’t here when he was here. Roy Williams? Wade won 13 games with the same team Bill won 9 with and they both lost in the playoffs. I’m not arguing against the job Parcells did. He brought this whole franchise back from the depths of hell. There is NO denying that. I was just stating that a lot of fans seem to want a coach that is more in your face like Parcells was. I just dont think that means a hill of beans and to me Parcells was the perfect example of that.

by TARHEEL PAUL on Dec 10, 2008 10:11 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm all for a tough coach that is demanding of their players

demeaning to them, no, but expect accountabilty and demand it. I wasn’t a big fan when the cowboys signed bill Parcells because I knew he would sign aging former players to try to make a run instead of scaping this whole team and start over. He got a false sense when the cowboys went 10-6 the first season with trash and after the house of cards collapsed in the second year, he began to strip this team of his cancers and problem players and went with youth and switched to a 3-4 defense for which he was accustomed too, two year late for me but I was glad he cleaned house in this organization and Jerry put his ego away and let bill run things

Bills biggest problem when here was the fact he didn’t have a franchise QB when he started, that slowed the development of this team and the fact the team was void of talent and he didn’t have mid players, meaning he didn’t have a core of players with 5-8 years of playing experince, the team was either aging players or young developing players, there was no mid core to bridge the gap from the aging players and the youth, there is now when you look at this team. I like coaches like Jimmy and Fisher, they hold their players accountable. And you need a coach that can stand up to Jerry Jones, that’s the problem with this team, you need a coach to stand up to Jerry and say NO, wade isn’t that guy, he’s more of a puppet. We need a coach to say to Jerry we’re not doing that. Jerry has his hand in too much in this organization, the players have to know the buck stops at the coach, if they dont have that understanding, they ignore what the coach says because they believe jerry is who they answer too.

When people say Bill was horrible and over-rated, should of never been hired, they dont know what they’re talking about. His record of building franchises cant be ignored. Just look what he’s done in Miami, with bringing in his kind of coaches and basically the same players with a few castoff cowboy additions, they are contending for a playoff spot after winning one game last year.. The key to their success is the fact they have a QB that isn’t flashy but makes the right reads and good decisions with the football.

With regards to the coaching staff question, I think if Wade doesn’t make the playoffs, he’s gone!!

I think jeryy will make Garrett the headcoach, I believe Jerry promised him that job last year. Norv Turner will be hired as the offensive coordinator, that will help Tony Romo and help with Garrett’s playcalling ability as a offensive coordinator for the future, they could work together well I think. Dom Capers as the defensive coordinator, he’s a 3-4 guru and Joe Avezzano as the special teams coach, Reid is surely gone after this year regardless. That would be my guess

by Deke on Dec 10, 2008 10:49 PM CST up reply actions  

As much as I'd love to see Norv come back

I don’t see him coming back if he can’t call the plays, and I don’t see why Garrett would give up playcalling duties, since that’s what got him to where he is.

"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee

by BigDinSC on Dec 10, 2008 11:17 PM CST up reply actions  

you're probably right, but you never know with Jerry

 personally, I’d like Norv as the offensive playcaller, Garrett could do with some learrning of how to gameplan and call a game. He’s a long way from being a good offensive coordinator. There have been many time of questionable calls and gameplans by him during his tenure here. Garrett would have enough on his plate as the headcoach, so one can hope for norv as the signal caller I guess.

by Deke on Dec 10, 2008 11:29 PM CST up reply actions  

What do you think about?

Having Mike Nolan as DC if Wade is fired? He said he wants to be a cordinator next season and he used to running a 3-4.

"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"

by Wmillion on Dec 11, 2008 1:57 PM CST up reply actions  

other good name.

"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"

by Wmillion on Dec 11, 2008 2:23 PM CST up reply actions  

while we're making Christmas lists

I want TTech’s Leach for OC, and Lebeau for HC overseeing his choice for DC

I commented. You're welcome.

another transplant from The Blue & Silver Report

by bulldog jeeper on Dec 11, 2008 2:38 PM CST up reply actions  

LeBeau coaches the Steelers defense

and will until he retires.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 11, 2008 3:48 PM CST up reply actions  

i didn't say it was a liklihood

just what i would will into existence.

I commented. You're welcome.

another transplant from The Blue & Silver Report

by bulldog jeeper on Dec 12, 2008 4:34 AM CST up reply actions  

I'd love Nolan

He knows what he’s doing defensively, and is creative. He’s also young enough to eventually be a head coach again, and i think he has what it takes to be a solid head coach with a little more experience. I honestly have no faith in Garrett’s ability as head coach, so having a D-Coordinator that might be up to the task in a few years would be my dream scenario.

"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee

by BigDinSC on Dec 11, 2008 4:03 PM CST up reply actions  

There is no question

That Wade is a great defensive coordinator. But there is a missing ingredient here. Some “thing” is missing. Now, I don’t know what it is, but I am not sure it is cured by allowing the current staff to keep running things. On the other hand, I am not sure it is cured by a coaching change. I would hate to be in Jerry’s shoes, because I know he thinks he’s close (he better be because he has already paid for this team).

by dave33 on Dec 11, 2008 9:10 AM CST up reply actions  

What's missing is Cowher...

Haha wouldn’t THAT be nice. I’m all for holding off coaching talks til the season is over. It definitely wouldn’t surprise me if Wade was gone though. He’s soft, but man does our defense look improved. I reeeeeeeally wish he’d stay on as a D-coordinator but I highly highly doubt he’ll take the demotion.

by AikmanNailedMySis on Dec 11, 2008 10:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Latest has Cleveland talking to Schottenheimer(sp?)

"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee

by BigDinSC on Dec 11, 2008 4:04 PM CST up reply actions  

that won't happen

Schottenheimer denies he’s interested.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 11, 2008 4:41 PM CST up reply actions  

That doesn't make sense to me

With the way he was dumped in San Diego, why wouldn’t he want a chance to take another AFC team (that does already have some talent) and show he still has what it takes?

"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee

by BigDinSC on Dec 11, 2008 5:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Wade is doing effing awesome

calling the defensive plays. To wit:

105 points allowed in 6 games
17.2 pts per game
(35 were aginst the Giants when the offense couldn’t hold onto the ball and the Giants had a short field all day long)
23 sacks, nearly 4 per game
Pressure even when not sacking the QB
10 defensive turnovers

I am disappointed in Romo for saying stuff like that. It is totally unseemly.

by DavidH22 on Dec 10, 2008 9:59 PM CST reply actions  

I disagree

It needed to be said and I’m glad he did

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 11, 2008 2:15 PM CST up reply actions  

It Was Pretty Obvious

And not just on the stat sheets. The Cowboys were playing passive, even timid defense. They used 1,000,001 excuses as to why they weren’t producing, but it was obvious something changed pretty substantially when the 4-6 appeared and the corners started playing up. What the hell was Stewart’s deal?

by GhostofGaryHogeboom on Dec 11, 2008 10:26 AM CST reply actions  

messenger boy

and a very well paid one at that..lol!

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 11, 2008 2:15 PM CST up reply actions  

HE HAS PEOPLE SKILLS!!!!!!!!

"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee

by BigDinSC on Dec 11, 2008 4:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

222724_1014143404454_1551120017_30067740_5911_n_small
Jason Garrett: From Process to Promise
Rush_hour_small
Is Doug Free Overpaid?
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Hindsight Games Part 1: J.J. Watt
Rush_hour_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario

Recent FanPosts

Small
Offseason Priorities
Small
Starters, dominant players, and BPA
Dez_bryant_small
What we need is for Jerrah to act like a GM and be proactive and fix the team with $17M under the cap resources
Small
It's Rabble's Fault
Small
Do what Philly did in 2011, only better
Dez_bryant_small
How The Giants GM Would Fix The Cowboys Overnight ... Good Read Jerrah!!!!
Zzzzwww_small
Twitter GM Mock

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui