Should Dallas toy with the West Coast Offense
I think that we could pull this off. We have the talent to make it work. What are you thoughts?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Coast_offense
The popular term "West Coast Offense" is more of a philosophy and an approach to the game than it is a set of plays or formations. Traditional offensive thinking argues that a team must establish its running game first, which will draw the defense in and open up vertical passing lanes downfield (i.e., passing lanes that run perpendicular to the line of scrimmage).
Bill Walsh's West Coast Offense, however, differs from traditional offense by instead emphasizing a short, horizontal passing attack to help stretch the defense out, thus opening up running lanes. The West Coast Offense as implemented under Walsh features precisely run pass patterns by the receivers that make up about 65% to 80% of the offensive scheme. With the defense stretched out, the offense is then free to focus the remaining plays on longer throws (more than 14 yards) and mid to long yard rushes.
Walsh's West Coast Offense attempts to open up running and passing lanes for the backs and receivers to exploit, by causing the defense to concentrate on short passes. Since most down and distance situations can be attacked with a pass or a run, the intent is to make offensive play calling unpredictable and thus keep the defense's play "honest".
Beyond the basic principle of passing to set up the run, there are few rules that govern Walsh's West Coast Offense. Originally the offense used two split backs, giving it an uneven alignment in which five players aligned to one side of the ball and four players aligned on the other side (with the quarterback and center directly behind the ball). Although Walsh-influenced teams now commonly use formations with more or fewer than two backs, the offense's unevenness is still reflected in its pass protection philosophy and continues to distinguish it from single back passing offenses. Throughout the years, coaches have added to, adjusted, modified, simplified, and enhanced Bill Walsh's original adaptation of the Paul Brown offense. Formations and plays vary greatly, as does play calling.
Another key part of the Walsh implementation was "pass first, run later." It was Walsh's intention to gain an early lead by passing the ball, then run the ball on a tired defense late in the game, wearing them down further and running down the clock. The San Francisco 49ers under Walsh often executed this very effectively.
Another key element in Walsh's attack was the three step dropback instead of traditional seven step drops or shotgun formations. The three step drop helped the quarterback get the ball out faster resulting in far fewer sacks. "WCO" plays unfold quicker than in traditional offenses and are usually based on timing routes by the receivers. In this offense the receivers also have reads and change their routes based on the coverages presented to them. The quarterback makes three reads and if no opportunity is available after three reads, the QB will then check off to a back or tight end. Five step and even 7 step dropbacks are now implemented in modern day WCO's because defensive speed has increased since the 80's. Some modern WCO's have even used shotgun formations (e.g. Green Bay, Atlanta '04-'06).
The majority of West Coast Offense routes occur within 15 yards of the line of scrimmage. 3-step and 5-step drops by the quarterback to take the place of the run and force the opposing defense to commit their focus solely on those intermediate routes. Contrary to popular belief, the offense also uses the 7-step drop for shallow crosses, deep ins and comebacks. For instance, the Michigan Wolverines utilize the 5- and 7-step drops about 85% of the time with West Coast pass schemes implemented by Quarterbacks Coach Scot Loeffler. Because of the speed of modern defenses, only utilizing the 3- and 5-step pass game would be ineffective since the defense could squat and break hard on short-to-intermediate throws with no fear of a downfield pass.
The original West Coast Offense of Sid Gillman uses some of the same principles (pass to establish the run, quarterback throws to timed spots), but offensive formations are generally less complicated with more wideouts and motion. The timed spots are often farther downfield than in the Walsh-style offense, and the system requires a greater reliance on traditional pocket passing.
A Walsh innovation was scripting the first 15 offensive plays of the game (Walsh went as far as to scripting the first 25 plays but most teams stop at 15). Since the offensive team knew that the first 15 plays would be run as scripted no matter what, they could practice those plays to perfection, minimizing mistakes and penalties. Success of the offense could establish momentum and dictate the flow of the game. Scripting also added an element of surprise, since a defense could be caught off guard by a scripted play that had no relationship to the current situation (e.g., a run play on third-and-long). It also gave the coaching staff an opportunity to run test plays against the defense to gauge their reactions in game situations. Later in the game, an observed tendency in a certain situation by the opposing defense could be exploited.
Finally, the West Coast offense, with its emphasis on quick reactive skills, can be seen to further develop the running quarterback motif, where extremely fast running quarterbacks (Michael Vick, Vince Young) and other notable scrambling quarterbacks (Jake Plummer and Donovan McNabb) are valued, if they are good passers, because in blitz or short-yardage situations, when the West Coast offense's value is negated, the running quarterback can make up this difference by posing a threat to make the first down himself, paralyzing an aggressive defense.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't know...
If you just switch over to an entire different system in one year.
I personally don’t think the entire system is wrong right now. I think that its adapting it to your competition.
I’ve always questioned why Dallas doesn’t just go no huddle sometimes. I mean not a total no huddle, but just sporadically to keep defenses off their toes and not let them change their packages.
I LOVE having two tightends on the field.
Run a two tightend set and go from that and spread it out 4 wide.
I’ll take at least a play or so with safety or a LB having to cover Bennett.
The main weakness is
still there. The OL is still integral to getting the defensive line down to open up throwing lanes. Until our offensive line play improves, the offense will remain stagnant.
there are a lot of ways to run it.
just like there are a lot of ways to run the 3-4.
Philly has run the West Coast with linemen similar to ours.
It would take one of the true West Coast guru’s to make it work in one year though. Someone of Mike Holmgrens type of stature.
Cris Carter....you're dead to me.
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Dec 30, 2008 2:22 AM CST up reply actions
I agree Glory...IF, and from what i see, Wade isn't going anywhere, but IF we were to change HC, I'd take Holmgren over all others..
This team is loaded with west coast style playmakers…but i do question if Romo could pull it off…He has all the skillsets to do so, but his timing, and lack of accuracy this season on the short patterns concerns me……I would think Romo would excel in a west coast offense though….given proper coaching, and him reinventing or establishing himself…
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
Those guys never seemed to have balls batted like Romo does.
He seems to really struggle throwing short passes unless he has a clear line. I also doubt that those two guys played behind a line as tall as ours.
6-7 6-5 6-4 6-6 6-8
by Mandmeisterx on Dec 30, 2008 1:29 PM CST up reply actions
too short??
Romo 6’2
Young 6-2
Garcia 6-1
I’ve always though height was too overrated regarding the qb position.
In Romo we Trust
Montana and Young were the same size or smaller than Romo
so that’s not the issue…
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
Romo needs to stop trying to be Brady
Early in the year a lot was made of Romo watching Tom Brady and trying to emulate him in the pocket. I think that caused a lot of his problems this year (along with the broken finger, bruised back and who knows what else we haven’t heard about yet).
If our line can’t block for 5 and 7 step drops then getting the ball out as quickly as possible is a resonable alternative. We have receivers and backs who could easily adapt to this type of offense.
Maybe if Garrett is lured away by another team we can bring in a coordinator who can implement a “Dallas” variety of the WCO.
Garrett needs to get a clue!
I pray every night for that day to come Bob..
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
I don't think quick drops and timing patterns are Romo's strengths.
by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 30, 2008 8:02 AM CST reply actions
They used to be
He used to get rid of the ball quickly or take off. Not so much anymore
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
He just needs to be less aloof
Romo is a bit too aloof for my taste. he doesn’t value an offensive possession as much as he should, or I don’t think he understands it as well and thus forcing some throws he shouldn’t. Parcells always said if Tony could control his urge to make some throws where he shouldn’t instead throwing it away or take a sack if you have to then he would be a great QB. that would mean giving up on making plays on some broken plays, which means less ESPN highlight, but by the same token it would mean less ESPN low lights.
just controlling that and that’s something that’s doable, its not like he is not accurate, or doesn’t have a strong arm or is stupid and can’t read defenses. its forcing a couple of throws here and there and then kicking himself in the arse. if he controls that, then he will be a top notch QB in the league for a very long time and allow his team to win a superbowl.
until then. its either missing the playoffs, heart breaking the fans and one and out in the playoffs.
facts:
Teams that don’t throw INts win 78% of the time
Teams that throw one Int win 56% of the time
Teams that throw two Ints win 33% of the time.
Tony averages more than one Int per game.

by 




















