Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: On returning Clemson/South Carolina to National Importance

Time to shackle Tony Romo

I'll get two things out of the way first:

First, there was an absolute clusterf*** of mistakes against the Eagles by a number of parties.  But the tone of the game on the field has to be set by the QB, and Romo just doesn't have that personality.  Giggling while the game is falling apart and then sitting on the bench with his head in his hands is just not going to do it.  Turnover after turnover, mistake after mistake, leading momentous changes in the flow of the game also will not do.

Second, it's not all his fault.  Really.  Our vaunted O Line is a sham, an absolute disgrace -- no doubt about it.  But they're not at fault for every single moronic play that Romo makes.  Sure, he has some inconsistent receivers and some shoddy coaching, but again, sometimes it's difficult to tell what the hell our savior is doing out there.

I'm convinced he can't help being the goofball who makes you avert your eyes, just like Wade can't help being Mr. Aw Shucks.  This image is further reinforced by his post-game quotes that basically tell me that Romo is more interested in going home and banging hot celebrities or being an all-around nice guy.  Hey, this is fine, except he's getting paid to quarterback the Dallas Cowboys, and that's kind of a big deal to me.

Star-divide

All right, so what do we do?  There's no better option than Romo, and Romo seems incorrigible.  Quite a dilemma, but a solution is in sight.

In a nutshell, this team needs to adopt the playcalling of the Tennessee Titans, and Tony Romo needs to be treated like Kyle Orton. 

Romo can't help trying to make the highlight play, and he's not going to help it.  So, the offense needs to take the option away from him.  The gunslinger mentality needs to be discouraged -- honestly, it's not working -- and Romo needs to be forced into busdriver mode.  If he's not already hit his ceiling, which is not unthinkable anymore, maybe he can develop a healthy balance in a few years.  For now, think about the following:

  • The downfield passing game has got to go.  Garrett is just enabling Romo's worst tendencies.  Short- to mid-range passes, quick slants and outs, and relying on the receivers to gain the necessary YAC.
  • Receivers:  We really ought to consider moving T.O. to the slot at least 50% of the time.  Yes, this makes Crayton expendable, but we already have superb outside receivers in Austin and RW2.  T.O. is not the prototypical slot receiver, but he has all the requisite qualities needed for the position.  Think of a bigger, stronger, meaner and tanner Wes Welker.  Let Romo just dump passes off to these guys.  Hopefully, this will also take some pressure off the line.
  • Run, run, run, run, run the ball.  Mix MB3 and Felix in the first and fourth quarters.  Choice and Felix in the second and third.  The ball needs to be run at least 35 times a game.  This is going to take some tweaking of the O Line, but the return of Kosier should be a big step forwards.

Romo should not need to throw the ball more than 20 times a game, and his game needs to handled like he's a rookie. For a kid who can't keep his hands out of the cookie jar, the best solution is to keep the jar out of reach until the child starts to behave.

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

6 recs  |  Comment 238 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

We have to find another QB to push Romo

It could come down to benching him to prove a point. We can’t do that until we get a decent QB that is capable of winning games.

by Boyzfan94 on Dec 30, 2008 7:53 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

yup......it's called competition..

If he can’t handle a little competition than he shouldn’t be playing in the NFL….

by Boyzfan94 on Dec 31, 2008 9:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

as long as Garrett is here, that will never happen

plus, Jerry is going to pay a franchise qb 11 million per year, and 2 of the highest paid WRs in the league to only involve them in less than 50% of the plays?

Yeah, that will never happen…Jerry would never allow it.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 30, 2008 8:02 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

outsider....

wheres your “Romo is the greatest” nonsense, terry? Accidental, great post. I posted elsewhere on here that this certainly isnt a problem of no talent. its poor coaching. changing a game plan when it isnt working isn on the players. its on the coaches. tony should be a “bus driver.” he needs to use checkdowns. thats one thing (if almost to a fault) that mcnabb does. he looks deep, and then checks down. doesnt force a play, or need to hit a HR on every play. i think Tony could learn something more positive watching Mcnabb, than his hero Brett Favre of late….

by GreenInBaltimore on Dec 30, 2008 8:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're saying

Jerry will never allow the Cowboys to adopt a winning strategy? The right decision is always the hardest even when it is the most obvious.

I will not criticize Jerry Jones, but if what you say is true, then he and Romo should double-date with Mark Cuban and Dirk — another pair of perennial chokers in love.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Dec 30, 2008 8:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

our offense in 2007 won 13 games

when our OL played well until the playoff game. You protect Romo and he’ll bring you home a championship.

QB is only as good as his OL protecting his ass.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 30, 2008 8:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

so....

did the O line blow it in the playoffs? Or was it Romo? And what about the year before? Romo? O line?

by GreenInBaltimore on Dec 30, 2008 8:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're kidding right?

You obviously didn’t watch that Giants playoff game. Romo spent almost as much time on his back as Brady did against that defense.

by mhuff13 on Dec 30, 2008 9:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

if you watched the games

if was obvious our protection broke down tremendously in the playoffs. Like I said, you give Romo time and he’ll pick you apart every bit as good as Brady or Manning.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 31, 2008 7:22 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

i agree 100%… look at the few games earlier in the year, when our line actually protected (aka. when cp wasn’t playing guard)

give Romo time, and he’ll dominate a game…

by CowboysFan4Life on Dec 31, 2008 8:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Romo didnt play bad in either game.

I dont care about a 4th and 25 desperation interception. Or a snap he never should have been handling. Check the numbers.

Cris Carter....you're dead to me.

by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Dec 31, 2008 7:27 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

i also agree…

people make that pick out to be some huge mistake… like you said, it was 4th and 25… he really had no other option….

and the snap… i mean, cmon… it was his first year starting, in the playoffs, and he’s holding the ex point? get out of here

by CowboysFan4Life on Dec 31, 2008 8:01 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sparano was the Oline coach last year

I think we miss him more then we imagined.. That Miami line was money.

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Dec 30, 2008 9:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Too to tell for December

since we wrapped up early.. Jan. they failed, but nothing like what we saw the 2nd half of this season..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Dec 30, 2008 9:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The only option for Jerry is for the Cowboys to win HIS way and your odds of succeeding drop substantially when anyone takes that sort of approach.

by macvechkin on Dec 31, 2008 2:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Romo is a goofball

and he’ll never bring a championship to Dallas.
He doesn’t have the patience,self control or motivation
to get better.
He’s not the answer….he’s a turnover waiting to happen……
Maybe we should start calling Tony……T.O. (Turnover)

BTW….Our OLine is a good run blocking line
Pass blocking…Not very good at all.

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Dec 30, 2008 10:11 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

O Line issues

If you notice last year, the line looked better pass blocking than run blocking. This contributed to the end of the Julius Jones era — a back that needs a hole opened for him for full effect.

Why the flip flop this year?

- Kosier’s injury
- Flozell no longer in contract year
- Davis standing around like an idiot

It’s not all Romo, but he defintely looks like he’s lost patience, motivation and self-control even when the protection has been adequate.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Dec 30, 2008 10:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1 on the line's reversal

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Dec 30, 2008 10:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It was obvious

The looked good with Kosier and Holland then struggled making up for Proctor.

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Dec 30, 2008 11:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

-1

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 31, 2008 7:23 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I might agree with some of it...

If not for the “motivation to get better.” part.

The dude supposedly spends the entire offseason throwing the ball to whomever or “whatever” he sees.

I’m going to call this a sophomore slump, because its only his seconde whole year as a starter.

Next year in my eyes will be the litmus test. Year 3 as a starter is a critical year.

by AirforceBat on Dec 31, 2008 10:32 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought

The playoff loss to the giants…
The Steelers loss
The Ravens loss
And the Philly debacle……were all supposed to be “defining moments”….but Romo keeps getting a free pass….and then of course throwing it to the other teams favorite DB…..LOL

I don’t think Romo is a big game QB and don’t think he ever will be.

Romo = Danny white
If he can ever make it to the NFC championship…LOL

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Dec 31, 2008 2:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

nahh...i haven't lost hope...he gets a pass from me...that o line was pathetic..

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Dec 31, 2008 6:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What about the Giants game

And the second skins games. Those would have been defining if he lost, but the fact that we won he gets no credit.

by witten82 on Jan 1, 2009 7:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Romo haters

always ignore his clutch performances, you should know that by now.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 8:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Just as you

ignore his mistakes and numerous flaws

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 1, 2009 11:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

obviously goes both ways

Romo has great stats and record. Has one knock on him and that he isn’t clutch, same knock Peyton has..

I will continue to be patient, I understand how truly difficult the NFL IS..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 1, 2009 11:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Same knock Payton had

He has gotten past in by winning big games

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 1, 2009 11:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

exactly too bad it took

him 6 yrs starting.. Romo is going 3rd full yr

patience.

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 1, 2009 11:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I would love for you to keep Tony...

I really, really would. I would love for you to keep someone who absolutely buckles under pressure and turns the ball over again and again. 3 years in row he has buckled in clutch performances (Bad hold in ‘06, Giants game ’07, and of course the Eagles game ’08), and usually he’s not the one bailing the team out, the Defense is bailing him out.

You should draft high for a QB this year or next, someone to put this franchise on. This year and next year should be great QB draft classes and I think you’re best served to do that. Romo is not the answer for you. Going 13-3 and then 9-7 should be unacceptable, I just don’t understand why you can’t get rid of him.

Furthermore, the reason he’s on his back all the time is because he refuses to get rid of the football on time. He just sits back there and waits, or tries to move around and gets pummeled half the time. You need a guy who will consistently dump it after a 3- or 5- step drop. I’ll take your OLine for next year, how bout that. I’ll take those guys and work em in. Your OLine rules, your WRs are good* (ugh…), and you have great RB’s…so where’s the problem????

by thwalls on Jan 2, 2009 8:36 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Dude, you are so far off

He didn’t choke in the Giants game first of all, he did choke in the eagles but so did the rest of the team! No one showed up to play! Our o-line was garbage. The running game didn’t do anything, so obviously either the backs or the line isn’t good. I’ve heard way better arguments against romo than that.

by witten82 on Jan 2, 2009 9:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Run, run, run, run, run the ball

mentality is fine by me. But you’ve got to realize that we’re going to need a consistently dominant defense because we will score an average of 17 points a game. Strong special teams play is also necessary. Did you all forget, running the ball and holding the huge edge in time of possession was the game plan in the playoff game against the Giants last year. Yet our defense gave up a quick touchdown before halftime. Special teams gave up a critical return in the 2nd half and the defense could not limit the damage to just a field goal. This defense has never been the shutdown type and it’s lack of consistent play is as mind blowing as Romo’s errant throws.

by troysboys on Dec 31, 2008 12:10 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I agree the ST part is iffy

Hopefully, a new coach can make progress.

But I honestly feel that our defense now has most of the pieces to play along with a run-first offense. Noone is going to drive down the field picking on Jacque Reeves anymore.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Dec 31, 2008 8:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Noone is going to drive down the field picking on Jacque Reeves anymore.

Maybe not. Teams will just run 70+ yards for touchdowns on ‘em. This defense just hasn’t shown that they are a consistent shutdown type over a full season. I’m all for a run first oriented offense but I would rather have it 52/48 run pass ratio. Of course, TO will never endorse the idea.

by troysboys on Dec 31, 2008 9:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Time for Romo to stop watching films of Tom Brady and start watchng films of himself

When he was palyng well, he got rid of the ball quickly or made some extra time by scrambling before slinging the ball down the field or just took off. This year it seemed like he tried to be a pocket passer too much and his decision making suffered. Time to shcakle his inner Tom Brady and unleash the real Tony Romo

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Dec 31, 2008 6:35 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I think you're on the money

I think if he watched himself more, he’d see that when he was successful, the pace of the whole offense was quicker. A big reason that he replaced Bledsoe at that time was he got the ball out of his hands faster. He holds onto the ball too long now and the defense just waits for him to make a mistake.

by illcowboy on Dec 31, 2008 9:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Receivers

I don’t see the receivers that way. I don’t think Owens has the hands to be a reliable slot-type receiver. His value will still be as a deep threat (which is a why a poor offensive line hurt his numbers so badly; less time to throw affects deep routes the most). I’d rather see the quick slants and such to RW2.

by jrduncans on Dec 31, 2008 6:38 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

RW2

Is a bum. He really disappointed me this year. He isn’t a team player and has an attitude problem. I thought the trade was good at first but now I’m thinking we could really use that 1st rounder.

by witten82 on Jan 1, 2009 7:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 8:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

don't overanalyze

The is much better chance Roy kills this year, then any rookie WR you bring..

Patience

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 1, 2009 11:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He might have talent

But he has a real attitude

by witten82 on Jan 2, 2009 8:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe I'm optimistic but...

(Yeah I know I’m reviving a long-dead conversation)

He may not have had a helpful attitude, but I didn’t see signs it was any worse than the rest of the group, and when things aren’t going well, and the people around you have a bad attitude, plenty of people will turn negative. I’m hopeful enough to say the jury’s out; a healthy RW2 with a training camp and time for Jason Garrett to include RW2 in planning properly should provide a chance to be very successful.

by jrduncans on Jan 6, 2009 6:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's the deal with Romo

Tony is like an untamed maverick who if left free to do what he wants will become very wild at times and its because he’s one of those rare athletes who really wants the ball in their hands and wants to win the game when the game is on the line. The problem is this isn’t basketball where one player, ie Jordon, can push his teammates to the side with 30 seconds left and win the game. In football you absolutely need 10 other players to perform their jobs as well.

In big games, Tony tends to try to put the game on his back and win it by himself…thats really what I love about the kid…he has a competitiveness and fire in his belly to win like no other. Just because he doesn’t go ballistic during press conferences doesn’t mean he doesn’t take losing very hard, some guys deal with losses better than others.

The bottom line is that the Cowboys don’t need to bring in another player to push Romo because they’re not going to find a better QB than him, what they need to do is bring in a coach like Parcells that will tame him and try to control his impulsive tendencies to win games by himself. Romo doesn’t need to be shackled, he just needs to be controlled and tamed. Its obvious Garrett or Wade didn’t do that with Tony, after Parcells left his wild side slowing began to rear it ugly head. We need a coach who will constantly prevent that wild side from appearing too much, especially in bigger game where Tony thinks its all on him.

Romo is a special player capable of making very special plays that can win championships, but he also needs that liontamer to crack the whip on him when he starts getting a little bit too wild and undisciplined. Garrett if he stays has to become that guy or we have to hire a guy to become that guy.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 31, 2008 8:03 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

This is why I made the suggestions above

He is not, and may never be, capable of carrying the Dallas Cowboys on his own. Yet, he continues to try. Fine, A+ for effort, and F for results. There is no controlling Tony Turnover, the stupid plays are a part of him.

So take the ball out of his hands and the pressure off his back. One day, he might learn to balance his wild theatrics with some solid, if unspectacular, quarterbacking. I’ll wait, but until then, he needs his leash shortened.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Dec 31, 2008 8:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

not true

If his OL blocks for him and his WRs get open, he certainly is more than capable of carrying this team. Its when his teammates fail him, and he tries to be superman, thats when he gets in trouble.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 31, 2008 8:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's silly

So every other player on the offense has to be perfect for Romo to do his job?

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Dec 31, 2008 9:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

not perfect, but just do their jobs

I guarantee you they do on the Colts and Pats when Manning and Brady are successful.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 31, 2008 10:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What mediocre QB

couldn’t carry a team if their line blocks and WRs get open?

by bryangene on Dec 31, 2008 9:04 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Terry....

I think this is the most accurate thing you have ever said about Romo. Maybe the board is to aggressive in their criticism and maybe you are too quick to defend him at time, but the truth is the guy has good skills and tools. I think the problem is that JJ has re-instituted his policy of placing himself between the star players and the coach, leaving the coach unable to discipline him.

I think Romo needs a coach who tears into him for INT’s, fumbles and other risky plays.

I think his career hinges on it.

by 325424 on Dec 31, 2008 9:04 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1 and -1

Terry,

I am in general agreement with your assessment of Romo’s strengths and weaknesses. I’m also in agreement that the o-line let Romo (and the team) down this year. Finally, I think Garrett made a lot of bonehead play calls in key situations throughout the year and put Romo in unneccessarily difficult situations.

Here is where I differ;

After Peyton Manning threw for 48 TD’s and broke Marino’s record without winning the Super Bowl, he went into his offseason with one thing in mind…lower the number of turnovers (interceptions) to give his defense a chance to do their thing. The result was his best year as a QB and a Super Bowl victory.

The thing I see in Manning and Brady that I don’t see in Romo (and, based on your comments, I think you dont see it either) is that Manning made that decision on his own. HE made the choice to go be a better QB for his team. No one was saying, “hey Peyton, you need to do this or do that!”. That is completely different than learning to throw the ball at different arm angles. Peyton assumed the role of leader through his actions. Romo has yet to do that.

Your contention that he needs a lion tamer is the mark of a QB who lacks the maturity and self-awareness to go fix what is broken. I’m talking about the things you have said are wrong with Romo.

No team has ever won a Super Bowl because something external changed their mentality and approach. The Colts won a championship because Manning matured and became the guy the best QB and leader that he could be.

Romo has to man up to his flaws and go fix them HIMSELF. Waiting for mommy or daddy to help him with is homework this offseason is a sickening state of affairs for a guy who has 67 million of the fans’ dollars invested in him.

No, I can no longer accept the Romo Apologist’s viewpoint as correct. Romo, just like Flozell, Newman, RW2 and others have to do the things neccessary this off season to help elevate the level of play on this team to what we all know it should have been in 2008 and needs to be in 2009.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Dec 31, 2008 11:25 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I certainly agree he still is in a maturation process

Why do fans keep forgetting he hasn’t even started 3 full seasons yet, as I stated earlier, he still is in his infancy as an NFL qb.

I think in time, with proper coaching, Romo can mature and do special things the likes of which this league has never seen.

Romo hasn’t even come close to reaching his potential as a QB in this league, the best has yet to come…and I said that last season when he put up MVP type numbers.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 31, 2008 12:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

tough to improve

When you are beat up, Romo spent most of the week trying to get healthy enough to go..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Dec 31, 2008 2:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Being beat up doesn't interfere with reading defenses

Or decision making.

I’ll concede, for the sake of argument, that b/c he was banged up he couldn’t help all those interceptions and fumbles, the other 2 glaring deficiencies in his game.

Nah, noob.

by Brian Thomas on Dec 31, 2008 2:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Dec 31, 2008 4:05 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If your hand is broken and back is stiff

You don’t think that would throw of your mechanics? It will be tough to hold on the football with a healing hand.. The strength just will not be the same..

Tough to not fumble when you are getting blasted from the blind side..

Plus if you are not practicing how can you work on timing with your WR’s?

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Dec 31, 2008 4:04 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What part of concede was unclear?

For your edification:

*con⋅cede*   /kənˈsid/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [kuhn-seed] Show IPA Pronunciation
verb, -cedâ‹…ed, -cedâ‹…ing.
–verb (used with object) 1. to acknowledge as true, just, or proper; admit: He finally conceded that she was right.
2. to acknowledge (an opponent’s victory, score, etc.) before it is officially established: to concede an election before all the votes are counted.
3. *to grant as a right or privilege; yield: *to concede a longer vacation for all employees.
–verb (used without object) 4. to make concession; yield; admit: She was so persistent that I conceded at last.

Back to my question: In what facet of his game is Romo 08 any better than Romo 09? It is a serious question, no shennanigans.

Is he a better field general than last year?

Does he make better decisions when pressed?

A great deal of reading defenses comes before the snap. Could perhaps some of those times he was “running for his life” be anticipated by a more prepared, more studious quarterback?

Did his answers during press conferences after big losses reassure you that he knew what the problem was and how to fix it?

Did you get the impression from his 1st half play in the Ravens or Eagles games, our playoffs, that he played with a sense of urgency, or that he didn’t wake the f up until we were nearly out of it?

Do you really, seriously, with a straight face, think all or even most of his fumbles are the fault of the offensive line? That we’d have the same result with any other QB, even though most don’t scramble with each arm at bird’s mast?

Most important, if there was a team squabble of some import, what role do you think Tony, if any, would play in squashing said beef? Would he be more like Meredith, Staubach, Aikman, White, Hogeboom, Hutchinson or QBOYC?

Do you think leadership is a critical component of NFL quarterbacking?

To be clear, I think Romo is a tremendous talent. But it is starting to look like that is all he is. I don’t get the sense that he has a problem solving, or even particularly curious, nature. After every failure, we just end up with an aw shucks, that sucks, dee to dee me-dunno.

Final question for you two and whoever else: I heard this exact same excuse-laden spiel last year after the ugly meltdown in Dec./Jan. If, in Dec. 2009, we have another collapse along these lines, w/ Romo’s Dec. QB rating dipping like my 401K, are you still driving the everything’s fine/it’s the OL’s fault/his receivers suck/Garret is clueless/Tony for 1st ballot HOF bandwagon?

Nah, noob.

by Brian Thomas on Dec 31, 2008 7:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

like I said

His INT% has improved each year he’s played and will continue to do so.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 1:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I hope his fumble ratio will improve.

I can take the INT’s if he could just secure the ball in traffic. He seems to have a 6th sense about pressure at times, but he also seems to lose focus and awareness almost as often when in obvious passing situations. I mean he can scramble well, but he also lets the defenders get close enough to swat the ball out way too much.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Jan 3, 2009 6:45 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I know

And the defenders know he’s easy to strip the ball from so they go after the ball even more. He has got to fix this problem.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Jan 3, 2009 11:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 31, 2008 2:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

But his fumble count increased while he was sacked only 20 times

Granted, he is good at evading pressure because certain members of the o-line are turnstiles, but that is an alarming number of fumbles considering he played only 13 games.

And you cannot attribute all of those to an injured hand, because he had the problem since the MNF game against the Eagles.

Seattle, the world's worst sports city.

by SSreporters on Dec 31, 2008 7:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

In 2008 he fumbled 10 times

He was lucky that the team recovered 8 of them and so only 2 tunrovers. This year 14 fumbles and 7 recovered by the other team so he gave it up 7 times.

Fumble recovery is mostly luck so unless he can figure out how not ot fumble it 10-14 times a year he is going to turn in over 5-7 times a year verse fumbles, which is very poor number.

by Trey, on Jan 2, 2009 12:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

the only reason his INT% went down

is he missed 3 games
Hell he coulda gotten another 5-6 INTs if healthy….

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Dec 31, 2008 10:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

wow

now he is throwing 2 a game?

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Dec 31, 2008 11:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah there is no way Romo would have thrown 6 picks in the games he missed.

They were before December and he plays well then

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Dec 31, 2008 11:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A back-handed compliment

…if I ever saw one. Nice.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Jan 1, 2009 6:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, he has a hot girlfriend.

That’s not backhanded.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Jan 2, 2009 2:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

not true at all

% has nothing to do with games played

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 1:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Great write up Bling.....your on a role...keep it up...lol

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Dec 31, 2008 12:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hey

Whatever it takes to Romo to fix it he needs to fix it.. Don’t forget Peyton and Belichick are some of the greatest coaches of all time, Wade is not, and it shows in his QB’s play..

I do think Jason G. and Romo will fix it this off-season.

Mike McCarthy had to reel in Favre and he came back with a great season, I see the same thing for Romo next year. If Favre can be reeled in, Romo can be reeled in..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Dec 31, 2008 12:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 31, 2008 1:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice 5Blings!

This is by far the best post I have seen on this site in quite some time. Congrats, you get my vote for the 2008 BTB Pulitzer Prize for blogging.

While Romo may have the physical skill set that rivals that of Peyton Manning and Brady, those two guys have maturity level and leadership skills that are far, far beyond what Romo brings to the table. Tony Romo is not a young guy anymore. He is a 28 year old grown up adult and he will be starting his SEVENTH NFL season in 2009. Exactly when is he going to develop maturity and leadership skills if he hasn’t by now? When he is 33? Those traits tend to emerge in great quarterbacks early on – often times well before the stats and wins pile up. This pile on nonsense that he has only been starting three years has worn out. Flacco and Ryan are about 23 years and have exactly one NFL season under their belt. Yet through maturity they have learned to be patient and manage games so their teams are usually in a position to win.

We cannot count on having a coach, mentor or anyone else push Romo. He needs to take it on himself. The reason I have left the Romo camp is because I just don’t think he will develop the maturity needed to manage games and the leadership skill needed to make the team better. He will continue to put up good numbers and be very entertaining to watch. But he will also continue to fold down the stretch and keep the Cowboys from ever having any real post-season success.

I joke a lot about Romo on this board, calling him names like Fools Gold and the Cabo Cowboy. But I’m dead serious when I say that if there isn’t a major improvement in Romo next season in the areas that DON’T show up in the qb statistics, then Dallas needs to move in a different direction. That is why it is critical THIS off-season to begin grooming one or (preferrably) two guys who can slide into the qb slot in 2010 if Romo continues to regress.

I will continue to hope for the best but I’m now prepared for, and perhaps resigned to, the worst.

by Cowboy Louie on Dec 31, 2008 3:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1 I hear that Louie...and agree totally...THIS off-season should be the time to think security blanket...

Let’s face it….like in the past few years, there is no reason to think we are actually drafting for first year starters, we are more or less upgrading at positions or perceived need….but there is nobody we are going to draft this spring that will come right in and start….Here in lines my theory that we really should be using our 2nd round selection on a QB…not to take over for Romo, but to learn behind him, to groom for future use in case of injury, or eventual starting replacement if Romo doesn’t continue to progress and mature……..We can NOT play the odds that he won’t get injured again, and we can’t have an empty cookie jar if he decides to have a mental breakdown or completely loses his mojo……

There are quite a few quality college QB’s that may enter this years draft, and there are not too many teams in a real need to use a first day pick on a QB, so THIS has to be the year to stock the QB cupboard for the future…This QB should have poise in the pocket, accuracy, a quick release, toughness, maturity, and above all else intelligence and leadership qualities…….Many scouts will have their favorites. Many have no clue what it really takes to be a leader. Many just poke and prod, and measure and time, but you have to know if the guy is up for the challenge, and you must be able to project future progression…Some QB’s may not fit all the measurables, but have a huge heart and desire to be the best. Some may have a quirk in their delivery, or release point. Some just played in a gimmicky scheme, but it all boils down to is the man a leader, Is he respected by his peers, Is he tough and determined enough to overcome flaws in his game, Is he coachable, and willing to put forth the effort to become the best he can be. Well, we all know that drafting an eventual starting QB can be a daunting task, and many top selections fail, and some succeed. But if I was to fail in selecting the wrong QB, It wouldn’t be because the player lacked heart and determination…..

That being said….Tim Tebow would be my selection to run my team in the future, as there is not a tougher, more intelligent, determined, leader anywhere in college football today…He’s not just a QB, he’s a damn football player, and a player i’d go into battle with anyday…If any of you missed his post game press conference after their only loss to Ole Miss, you missed one of the most inspirational speachs and proclaimations ever witnessed…period…He took this team on HIS shoulders, and drove them through the rest of the season completely demolishing whoever stood in their way……He already has what Romo will never have, respect, conviction, drive, devotion, and the unparralled leadership of HIS team.

Of course many scouts are already projecting him at HB/TE, cuz he doesn’t have a quick release or stealth physique, or he’s coming from a spread offense, not accurate enough, and he runs too much…….GIVE ME A FRIGGIN BREAK……when he leads U of Florida to their 2nd National Championship…You’ll be witnessing one of the greatest college QB’s of all time…..oh btw…the Heisman voting is a shame, cuz Tebow was the most deserving this year as well…………enjoy…

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 1, 2009 1:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I would also love Tebow on the Cowboys

But we have so many other needs that need filling. Btw, he did deserve the Heisman — I thought so too.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Jan 1, 2009 7:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good info

but, you don’t think we need to draft a safety with our 1st selection? What about ILB?

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 1, 2009 10:16 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Several Safeties and LB's available in rounds 3-4, in which we have at least 3 picks in those 2 rounds..

There is no way of knowing right now where any player may project UNTIL the underclassmen declare….Tebow may very well go anywhere between late 1st to early 4th, depending on which junior QB’s declare….Same can be true for Safeties, LB’s, and O Linemen, and D Linemen….Our ONLY 5 needs…It’s alot easier finding a quality LB or S in the mid rounds than it is selecting a top 5 QB….

I see only about 3-4 QB’s going on day one…NOT due to lack of talent at the position, BUT the need for Franchise type QB’s is low this year ( Minny, San Fran, Detroit, Kansas City) are the ONLY teams i think would even entertain using a day 1 pick at QB…, ….Matt Cassel being the only legit FA available for teams looking to upgrade their QB spot…Now Cassels gets signed, leaving maybe 3 teams looking to draft a QB early….I like our odds…IF pick 50 comes rolling around and there are still 3-5 really good QB’s hanging around, we can defer to the 3rd to pick one up, and take a look to see what’s out there for OL, DL,S,and LB………….BUT round 4 will open the flood gates to all remaining top tier QB prospects…..and we aren’t looking for a damn clip board holder…WE NEED a QB with the attributes, skills, and ability to start right away if neccessary, pending injury or replacement of the starter……NO…It’s not wasting a pick……..our roster is set to select at best available player mode….. YES…It is a severe position on NEED…..more so than any other position because good ones don’t grow on trees……we’ll see how it all plays out….

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 1, 2009 4:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

not going to happen

this team has more important needs, we can draft a developmental qb in the 4th, 5th rd area

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 1:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

here's the paranoid obsessed man crusher calling the shots..

developmental ????? dude…The guy either has it, or he don’t……You don’t draft raw, obscure, mediocre QB’s and hope to develope them……Tony Romo’s are far and few between…..and it took him over 3 years to break the starting lineup….and according to you, he’s still developing, and maturing….We don’t have 4 more years to wait for him to mature…We obtain a top notch QB now to groom over the next two seasons, in case your boy regresses like he clearly did this year…..Cuz Romo has two more years to go from Gary Hogaboom to Danny White…choker or hero….loser to winner…“oh golly gee” to “let’s go”………If we go the next two years without a championship, I assure you Romo will not be around much longer…..and I for one want to have his replacement on hand….not some late round flyer…

Another thing…I assure you the top 5 QB’s draft grades are far superior to any LB or Safety or DL or OL we can obtain at pick 50……….IF the QB’s slide, I’d be all for waiting til the 3rd round to grab one….But it’s simply a crap shoot if we wait til the 5th round or later to select a QB…….

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 1, 2009 4:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

3rd Round QB sounds very reasonable.

Besides even if Romo shows himself to be the long term answer, there’s a fair chance the QB you take in the 3rd round is enough of a commodity that you can at least recoup the pick and probably gain some extra picks the way the Packers did with Mark Brunell and Matt Hasselbeck.

by MadMick on Jan 1, 2009 8:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1 exactly Mick....that's why it's a no brainer...

and we certainly have enough talent on this roster to be selecting “Best Available Player” , rather than selecting a supposed position of need like OL, DL, LB, or S in rounds 2 or 3 that wouldn’t be starting for a year or two anyhow……ummmm…like ‘06-Carpenter and ’07-Spencer…1st rounders mind you……….Knowing Jerry, and his earlier days of lacking foresight to make such moves…I can’t count on us even drafting a QB………but we damn well should.

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 1, 2009 9:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Does that award come with a new car?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Jan 2, 2009 2:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think

this is Romo’s last year to prove himself.

by bryangene on Dec 31, 2008 9:05 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

He's already done that

he just needs to tone down his flare for being reckless and wild and it can be done.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 31, 2008 10:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He hasn't proven anything

Tony is getting a rep around the league as a screwup a goofball and a choke artist.
He did nothing this year to disprove his rep.

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Dec 31, 2008 10:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

only among idiots who don't know what they're talking about

3 staright years with a qb rating over 90 tells me he’s the real deal and the only ones choking are his teammates around him.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 1:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Who really cares?

Sorry man, forget QB rating and realize that if you do NOT WIN, then all positive stats go out the door.

But just for fun, let’s look at his December and January stats:


2008

84-150 (56% completion rate), 889 yards, 4 touchdowns and 6 interceptions, 12 sacks, a 70.1 QB rating which was aided by his 1 good performance against the Giants, a 113.7 QB rating. A record of 1-3..


2007 (Games 13-15 and the Giants playoff game, because the Redskins game meant nothing)

94-158 (59%), 974 yards, 4 touchdowns and 5 interceptions, 9 sacks, a 69.6 QB rating that saw a fantastic performance against Detroit but a dud against Philly. A record of 2-2.

2006 (Games 12-16 and playoff game against the Seahawks)

112-186 (60%), 1436 yards, 7 touchdowns and 9 interceptions, 15 sacks, 9 fumbles. A 79.6 QB rating. Most importantly, a 2-4 record.

A 5-9 record in meaningful December/January games, a 73.1 QB rating, 15 touchdowns and 18 interceptions.

You’re right Terry, he isn’t choking at all.

Seattle, the world's worst sports city.

by SSreporters on Jan 1, 2009 3:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

isn't it funny how his Dec and Jan stats

correlate to the OL falling apart during those times.

But I guess you just think thats a coincidence since you’re convinced its all on him.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 4:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So basically every sack allowed is the offensive line's fault?

Have you not heard of coverage sacks? Have you not heard of holding onto the ball too long?

Please look at his interceptions this December and you tell me if it’s because he was under pressure……

Seattle, the world's worst sports city.

by SSreporters on Jan 1, 2009 5:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Romo rarely took coverage sacks

watch the games and you’ll see our OL allowed jailbreaks in Dec and Jan, just horrid blocking.

His INTs were the result of him trying to make plays after the intial play broke down because of horrid pass blocking.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 5:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So throw the ball the heck away!

I love Romo’s ability to try and make a big play but it’s a double edged sword and he makes too many stupid mistakes.

If the same thing happens over and over again surely he’s heard of changing the play?

Seattle, the world's worst sports city.

by SSreporters on Jan 1, 2009 5:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

he's a playmaker and gambler

he takes chances and thinks he can make something out of nothing. I’m sure as he grows more mature as a qb he’ll start to play a little more conservative.

He’s still very young yet in terms of being a starting NFL qb…he’ll learn.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 5:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree to some extent

But if you’re going to be elite you cannot be stupid with the football. It took Peyton Manning 2 years to transform an awful team to a 13-3 team and an annual playoff contender.

Nowadays it no longer takes you 4 years to transform into a great QB.

I will however give him at most 2 years to improve his game.

Seattle, the world's worst sports city.

by SSreporters on Jan 1, 2009 5:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

It takes a while to become a truly great NFL qb. Manning wasn’t a great qb until he was in the league for 5-6 years.

Playing qb in the nfl is the hardest position to play in any sport.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 6:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're high, dude.

Peyton was an All Pro by his 2nd season.

by MadMick on Jan 1, 2009 8:04 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no he wasn't

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 8:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He had a 90+ QB rating in his 2nd year and they finished 13-3.

It did take him 4 tries to win his first playoff game but by year #2 he was playing great football.

I guess the problem with this argument is we expected Manning to be great, he was the top pick.

Seattle, the world's worst sports city.

by SSreporters on Jan 1, 2009 8:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Romo had 90+ rating

in his second year starting and finished 13-3 so I don’t understand your point unless you’re saying Romo is great.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 8:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

U can’t ignore this fact.

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 1, 2009 11:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm talking about actual greatness; not Super Terry's sliding scale.

Or is it because that’s when the Colts finally won a playoff game? Which basically means you’re admitting Romo hasn’t achieved anything resembling greatness yet.

If Peyton Manning wasn’t great pretty much year besides his rookie season when even then he had 26 TD passes, I would like you to name me who the great QB’s actually were.

by MadMick on Jan 1, 2009 8:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

-1

You cannot judge Romo entirely on how the team does.

Brees had an amazing year and still couldn’t get the defense to stop opposing teams. I don’t blame Brees for that.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Jan 2, 2009 2:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

great post....right on the money on all counts....just need a new OC

With our 3 headed moster in (MBIII,Cat,Choice) we should be running 35+ times a game….throwing 20+ times a game…Think NYG and Carolina………..Ball control, 3 step drops, rythmic short and intermediate pass plays, and TO in the slot with RWII and Austin outside…..with much use of TE’s and RB’s on check downs……it’s an easy solution to our problems……..

IF some how , some way, Jerry and Wade could entice Mike Shanahan into coming here just to coach the offense (which i think he would do) this whole problem would go away…Cuz obviously 2 career back up QB’s(Garrett & Wilson) aren’t getting through to Romo….Shanahan loves Romo, and would hone his skills and help him progress, and play smarter sound football.

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Dec 31, 2008 9:27 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Shanahan is a WC guy so I'm not sure how that will fly.....

He will land on his feet somwhere…..Maybe the Jets…I think he would want to stay in the AFC.

by Boyzfan94 on Dec 31, 2008 9:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

WHAT

why in the world would a head coach with 16 years of head coaching experience would accept a job as OC? this guy is getting a $20mm buyout. can you come with an example of ANYTHING like that ever happening?

why not get cowher to come be DC?

or jj to be position coach?

by 325424 on Dec 31, 2008 10:32 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You hit the nail on the head genius....

He is recieving a 20 million buy out….so OBVIOUSLY money will not decide where he goes…and I am sure Jerry would rather hand Garrett’s 3 million over to Shanahan…….Shanahan would command no personel power here, he would simply run the offense……..that’s it……no pressure, no media distractions, no frills….just kick back and call plays….I think most coaches out there would actually perfer that position……You think Wade is happy having to go to a podium every day and talk to these azzclowns that think they know it all called the media ??? …I’m saying Shanahan WOULD come here just to coach the O, but he SHOULD……If you look at his record over the past 4-5 years…he isn’t exactly fairing well as a GM/HC…..His passion is coaching offense…not being a dictator or overseer of the whole show…….

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Dec 31, 2008 12:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

working for his son..

Different circumstance. When your son calls you have to go..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Dec 31, 2008 12:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

PLUS...

his style doesn’t fit our personell.

You would have to almost completely re-do the offensive line.

by AirforceBat on Dec 31, 2008 10:34 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

AND

he was an awful personnel guy, very JJ like in that he liked to sign trouble makers, make splashes, etc.
i think they would royally mess up the roster together

by 325424 on Dec 31, 2008 10:45 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I really think Romo has the physical tools to be a great quarterback. I’m really concerned he doesn’t have the mental make up to be one. Not to he’s not intelligent; quite the contrary. Learning an NFL offense would probably be a big undertaking for us out here.

But he very relaxed attitude isn’t what makes for a great QB. Yes, I want him to enjoy the game and not lose that enthusiasm, but sometimes he needs to be less play ground and more office. There is a time to act like the world is your oyster and there is a time to act like this is life and death. He doesn’t have the attitude that football is important enough to truly get worked up about. That’s fine in our civilian desk jobs, for the QB of an NFL team it won’t work.

So while I do believe he’ll find a slightly higher degree of success than he’s had so far, he won’t ever be a champion until he decides he wants to put everything else aside and devote his life to that goal. Being of single mind with football is critical. He can’t spend a few months honing his golf game in the off season to qualify for the US Open. He has to dedicate himself to winning with the Cowboys.

I’d like to think he has it in him and will maybe draw that aspect of his personality out this year. Who knows. But until he finds that fire, the results we have seen the last two years are probably not going to change in regards to his play and laziness with the football.

by Tech92 on Dec 31, 2008 3:03 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

He does devote his life to football

but everyone needs down time away from their profession. I doubt you’ll find a more dedicated player to football than Romo, he’s a gym rat for sure.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 31, 2008 3:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

do they have a gym in Cabo????

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Dec 31, 2008 10:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ouch

In hindsight, that little vacation speaks volumes about his desire. It’s only a non-issue if he wins, and unfortunately, he didn’t.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Jan 1, 2009 7:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They made too big of a deal about that

But you’re right. He won’t shake that until he wins something.

by illcowboy on Jan 1, 2009 9:18 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

lol...please...in between the pina friggin colada's ???????????????

gotta love the delusional devotion though….to the likes i’ve never seen…

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 1, 2009 4:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

its true though

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 7:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That has to be a joke!

Either way, I wouldn’t lead with that…

:-)

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Jan 2, 2009 2:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

That’s funny stuff.

I don’t want to hear about Romo and Witten practicing plays down in Cabo, or Catalina or Belize or etc….

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Jan 3, 2009 6:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

False

Romo is less dedicated to football than I am to my career, and likely you to yours. I guarantee you I put in more hours (and you) each week and year doing what I do than Romo does being a football player. And it’s not even close. By getting away, yes, go take a week or 10 vacation. But months? Seriously? Daily rounds of golf? He does it because his job doesn’t require 40 hr work weeks and he has a lot of money to play with.

I work out a couple of hours every few days…some would call me a gym rat. Does not qualify me to be an NFL quarterback. I want to hear about him finding a group of high school kids and throwing for three hours…I want to read about him working with R. Williams and the guys to get on the same page…I want to hear him say golf is a nice hobby, but it can wait a few more years…I want to hear about how he spent a week with Jason Garrett hunkered down and fine tuning the offense. Does he do this stuff? Don’t know, but I do know we don’t hear about it if he does. We do hear about his golf and his girlfriend and his vacations and his night life.

by Tech92 on Jan 1, 2009 9:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

absolutely not true at all

you have no clue what Romo does in the off season so get a clue before spouting off on something you have no idea what you’re talking about.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 1:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Right

And you do.

Seattle, the world's worst sports city.

by SSreporters on Jan 1, 2009 2:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Off-season reporting bonanza

I’m sure Tech92 has plenty of information on what Tony Romo does in the off-season. I know my wife does. She likes Romo for non-football reasons and is constantly reading stories from the paparazzi about the latest coming and goings of Tony Romo. He loves the spotlight and therefore makes it very easy to stay in touch with what he does. His girlfriend makes her living by staying in the limelight.

Just because Romo’s off-season activities do not fit neatly into your bizarre picture-perfect view of The Greatest Player to Ever Play Football doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Try a Google search on Tony Romo once a week during the off-season. You might find it harder to pretend all his non-football activities don’t exist.

Tech92 wrote: “We do hear about his golf and his girlfriend and his vacations and his night life.” to which you responded “you have no clue what Romo does in the off season so get a clue before spouting off on something you have no idea what you’re talking about.”

I (or anyone else) could write a thesis on Tony Romo’s golf game (hint: it’s really good), his girlfriend (hint: she’s really hot) and his vacations (hint: he likes Mexico). It is you that needs to quit spouting off as if you are the sole keeper of The Truth regarding Tony Romo. It’s really quite pathetic.

by Cowboy Louie on Jan 1, 2009 3:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

whats pathetic is your hatred for the kid

you hear about Romo so much because he’s the qb of the Dallas Cowboys, Troy Aikman’s off season life was just as publicized.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 4:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I never recall hearing anyting about Aikman, besides the fact he led a quiet, simply, out of the public life....

so please…don’t go making stuff…..Aikman was once perceived to be gay cuz he was nowhere to be seen in public, especially with bimbo bleached blondes…

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 1, 2009 5:04 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

then you have an awful memory Boyz

Aikman was always in the news back in the 90’s about dating celebrites (Laurie Morgan) and the like, but of course back then there wasn’t the internet or blogs either.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 5:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Al Gore didn't invent the internet yet.

Seattle, the world's worst sports city.

by SSreporters on Jan 1, 2009 5:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He is a celebrity quarterback, which Parcells advised against

and before I get accused of being a Romo Hater, I love the guy. I named my dog ‘Romo’ in his honor, and I think he is the Cowboys’ franchise QB for the foreseeable. I’d just be happier if he dumped that dumb ass blonde and her creepy father, and stopped trying to qualify for the US Open

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Jan 1, 2009 5:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no he's not

he’s preceived to be a celebrity qb, he’s on record many times as saying he hates the spotlight.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 5:33 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

yet he always seems to find it

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Jan 1, 2009 5:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're joking, Terry.

Romo: I’m gonna date Jessica Simpson……oh that darn spotlight is at it again.

He is star struck when he forgets he hasn’t done squat in the big games and he was a backup not too long ago.

Seattle, the world's worst sports city.

by SSreporters on Jan 1, 2009 5:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

how can he help who he falls for?

celebrity or no celebrity.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 5:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Does he NOT know what he is going into dating a celebrity?

He’s getting commercials, dates with celebrities, but he doesn’t like the spotlight.

Seattle, the world's worst sports city.

by SSreporters on Jan 1, 2009 5:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Manning makes tons of commercials

I guess you consider him to be a celebrity qb too?

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 7:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

and he doesn't date a string of actresses and singers

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Jan 1, 2009 8:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Carrie Underwood, then Sophia Bush, then Jessica Simpson...if you only go out with celebrities, you are going to fall for celebrities

Like I said, I named my dog for the guy, so I like him, and I share at least some of your optimism regarding his future, but the guy likes the spotlight a bit too much, despite his protests to the contrary.

And WTF is going on with trying to qualify for the US Open?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Jan 1, 2009 6:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

he's a great golfer...why not

If you think manning is working out 24/7 in the off season you’re mistaken.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 7:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

so what??

Focus in June on what? get a clue

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 7:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Being a better QB.

Seattle, the world's worst sports city.

by SSreporters on Jan 1, 2009 7:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

he does that all the time

I’m sure playing a few rounds of golf isn’t to detract from that..absurd.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 8:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Trying to qualify for the US Open is not "playing a few rounds of golf"

Trying to qualify is a serious investment in time and energy, time and energy which could have spent practicing holding on to the ball, for example

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Jan 1, 2009 9:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Focus on Football, not golf

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Jan 1, 2009 8:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no you're not

you’re going to OTAs and working out and Romo never missed one OTA or workout because of golf…get a clue already.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 9:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

wow

Now you are trying to tell him how to live his life. Who he can date, what he can do in his spare time, how he should feel after a big loss..

I feel for Romo.. He is under a bigger microscope then any other qb..

Wasn’t green bay 13-3 last year? How they do this year?

do you realize how many QB’s are near scratch golfers?

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 1, 2009 11:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, now I have to stop you...

That is just plain ridiculous.

She’s dumber than a fart and he has the keys to America’s most important and valuable sports franchise. Then, you say, “he cant help who he FALLS for” after saying he hates the limelight?

Why do I feel like you are really his brother or something?

Is there something you’re not telling the BTB crowd?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Jan 2, 2009 2:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Enough!!!

I’ve had enough of this embarrassing football season. I just hope that Tank Johnson knocks that stupid grin off Romo’s face on his way out…let the blackouts begin.

by El Jofre on Dec 31, 2008 6:55 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

El Jof....cruel man..

funny though……

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 1, 2009 1:53 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

mate thse guys are paid to put a positive spin on everything Cowboys.

Whats your excuse?

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 1, 2009 11:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You won't find a bigger Romosexual than me but...

there does seem to be quite a contrast between how Roger Staubach prepared and practiced and competed and the way that Romo does. We’ve all heard how Staubach played football even while IN VIETNAM, and how he would utilize his R ‘n’ R by visiting the Cowboys minicamps! This is before he started his pro career in 1969. That’s simply amazing.

I usually think that Romo reminds me of Staubach in their style of play and last-minute comebacks, but maybe Romo is more like Don Meredith – laid-back and carefree, and a player who didn’t have his best games in the playoffs (save for the 1967 divisional game against the Browns). But then again, Meredith had a reputation for being a tremendous leader, which Romo does not particualrly seem to be. Maybe Romo is more like Craig Morton, who according to Mel Renfro was giggling with and goosing his girlfriend in the back of the bus after their loss after Super Bowl V.

I get it that football is “just a game.” And I get it that you aren’t a leader just because you yell at your linemen or marginal receivers (hi Troy!). But man, I’d love to see Romo appear to care about winning and losing, and to STOP sitting by himself on the sidelines, apparently moping. Geez, I kind of like what Phillip Rivers does, getting all jacked up, even if he is an as*hole.

by DavidH22 on Jan 1, 2009 8:42 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

absolute myth

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 8:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Explain the constant turnovers (specifically fumbles) without blaming the offensive line.

Explain the dead ducks he threw against the Ravens with no pressure in his face.

Seattle, the world's worst sports city.

by SSreporters on Jan 1, 2009 9:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

obviously you didn't watch the game

because he had tremendous pressure on both of those plays. Whether you want to believe or not the lack of protection is the reason for the vast majority of his turnovers. I’ll let Mickey explain it.

Think about it: When does Romo fumble most? When he’s running around. So why is he running around in the first place?

When does Romo get intercepted the majority of the time? When he’s making impulse throws. What causes these impulses to kick in? In-your-face pressure.

http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/news.cfm?id=9433EF4C-E123-D1CB-AF15808A397F7858

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 9:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

lol.....tooo funny.....we've only seen it every game of his career.....but hey...don't believe the myths..

Terry will defend Romo til he goes down in flames..I love Romo, but i’m also objective and able to critic him when he’s not playing to the standards he’s already established for himself…In fact, the most disheartening news i’ve heard all year is how many of his teammates have come forward questioning his devotion and work ethics….And from his in game play, sideline demeanor, and post game interviews…I have every reason to believe he hadn’t taken the steps forward needed to build on a foundation laid to make him a better QB or leader…………..That’s the last thing i wanted to hear in a season that totally ripped away my insides put me in a serious state of depression….

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 1, 2009 9:50 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I don't listen to media nonsense....It was my own assessment being collaberated by media reports.
And from his in game play, sideline demeanor, and post game interviews…I have every reason to believe he hadn’t taken the steps forward needed to build on a foundation laid to make him a better QB or leader

I really really really want Tony Romo here for the next 6-8+ years winning us 2+ SB’s…..He was the brightest prospect, with the most exciting style of play out of a QB here in Dallas since I first starting football in the mid 70’s….Nobody is pulling for Tony Romo any more than me…beleve that…I don’t expect perfection from him, but I do hope and pray for progression, and this year he he let me down.
 I truely expect his BEST year will be this upcoming season…….but if i’m here 12 months from now, and nothings changed, then i’ll be left wondering what ever went wrong with him.

.

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 1, 2009 11:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Its hard to progress

When your OL can’t block and your receivers run sloppy routes. I’m not saying Romo was without fault, I never have, but he can’t do it all my himself, especially as inexperienced as he is as a starter.

If Jerry ever figures out how to get a good, solid OL on the field and our receivers start becoming more disciplined route runners, you will see Romo ecxel for the next 6-8 years and win multiple championships.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 2, 2009 6:35 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

to a very great degree, yes

I don’t know how a qb is supposed to progress when his teammates around are failing and the OC is not making necessary adjustments to correct anything.

Romo prepares and plays as hard as anyone, but he is only one player.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 2, 2009 1:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe some myths there

but we’ve all seen Romo sulking on the sidelines when things aren’t going well. That’s the last thing I want my QB doing after he makes a bad play or when the team is losing. I want him encouraging people and getting himself psyched up or…something!

And I am getting tired of hearing him say things like “if the worst thing that happens to me is that I play poorly or that we lose a game, then life is pretty good” or words to that effect. That makes me want to retch.

Somebody who posts here has a signature line that says “You have to hate to lose more than you want to win” or something like that. I love that! That sounds like something Ray Lewis would say. It definitely does not sound like something Tony Romo would say.

by DavidH22 on Jan 1, 2009 10:12 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

not maybe

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 10:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I daresay we're a little off-topic

I’m just saying Tony Romo is not ready to carry the Cowboys to the Superbowl next year. And maybe he shouldn’t be asked to shoulder the responsibility.

A season or two being restricted as a busdriver QB might force him to better himself. As it is, just like Terry keeps parroting, Romo seems to be hoping that everyone around him gets better so he can have “some fun out there.”

He’s got great skills and superb instincts, but I think he’s let the praise get to his head.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Jan 1, 2009 10:25 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

don't think so

when his OL protects him and his receivers get open, he’s obviously capable of taking this to the SB.

I got news for you, there isn’t a qb in the league that could take this current team to the SB the way they played this season, including P Manning.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2009 11:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

disagree

Manning had no running game and an o-line just as bad as ours for most of the season and his team is still playing in January.

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 1, 2009 11:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

not true at all

Indy’s OL is 10 times better than ours, obviously you don’t watch many of their games. If Romo had Indy’s OL and receivers, he’d win MVP as well.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 2, 2009 6:37 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Romo can't be a bus driver

If the line isn’t blocking for the run game(Marion averaged less then 4 yds a carry).. And the D for most of the season was giving up 21+ points a game..

Dallas isn’t set-up for a bus driver QB.

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 1, 2009 11:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

not only that

you would be taking away his biggest strength as a qb.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 2, 2009 6:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And his biggest weakness

Lately, that’s been the sharper edge of the sword.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Jan 2, 2009 8:34 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think Jason G.

Should use his friendship with Troy and bring Troy in this off-season to work with Romo..

We need to turn Romo’s scramble ability to our benefit, shorter routes, more roll-outs, more slant routes for the WR’s, move the pocket to adjust for blitzs. More screens.. More Felix..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 2, 2009 10:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Big assumptions that may not be correct

WMillion, you are assuming (1) that Romo wants to be in Dallas during the offseason working on his game and that (2) Romo wants to and is willing to be mentored.

I’m not so sure about the first assumption. Tony likes his high profile life away from football that is filled with hot women, beautiful golf courses and lots of media attention. Who wouldn’t like that life?

In comparison, being stuck at Valley Ranch, under the radar working on your football game sounds like a drag to me. Only the most dedicated of professionals who are focused solely on improving their game would make that choice – especially after signing that career contract that provides financial stability for life. Is Romo that guy or will he reside in Hollywood during the off-season with his knockout girlfriend? The answer will be very telling.

by Cowboy Louie on Jan 2, 2009 12:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

boy, are you delusional regarding Romo

He practically lives at Valley Ranch during the off season.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 2, 2009 12:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ahem...

It’s been a while, but I remember being 27 years old. I was making more money than I should have been and I was living on the beach in L.A.

I am not going to fault Romo for wanting to hook up with Jessica or Giselle or both at the same time. He’s a guy with a $67 million dollar gig and he SHOULD be able to live it up a bit. These guys have become the media stars of sports. No one cares about the thugs in basketball or the A-Rod’s of the world. It is ALL about Romo and Brady and all the other big, young camera-ready QB’s in the NFL.

What I will fault him with is how he rallies (or sometimes fails to) his team together. Once again, we’ve seen Manning win with a shoddy, injury-riddled o-line. We’ve seen him win without his favorite target.

We’ve also seen Romo look very average without T.O. in the lineup and we’ve seen him play poorly when the o-line was struggling.

Let’s make sure I am clear; I believe in Tony Romo. I’ve said this before; Tony Romo gives me hope as a fan, in ways I have not had since Aikman left.

Even so, I want to see him step it up. He’s been through adversity now. He can’t make any more excuses. He’s got more talent on his side of the ball than any other QB in the NFL. He needs to protect the football. He needs to learn how to take a sack. He has to get stronger.

Until he does those things, he will also have to suffer the criticisms from the fans.

And, before Terry chimes in, he also needs his supporting cast to do their freakin’ jobs! and that includes the RHD (Red Headed Doofus)!

Now I’m done.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Jan 6, 2009 7:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

you have never seen Manning win

with a shody OL, thats has never happened. Manning needs protection because he’s as mobile as a statue.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 6, 2009 9:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure it is ....If you call the proper plays, formations, and allignments...

If you can’t gain 4 yards with a 225lb RB, behind a line averaging 330lbs, two TE’s listed at 265lbs, and a fullback pushing 250lbs….then you shouldn’t be calling plays in the NFL.

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 2, 2009 12:01 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Bottom line with this team...

Jerry made a mistake by not keeping this team hungry. Last year start Romo was hungry, JJ could have let the season play out… before giving Romo all “THAT CASH”. Maybe his agent would have made it a little harder… but the bottom line is everybody got paid. I believe last year he dosen’t take that vacation trip before the playoffs if he didn’t have an extenstion.

by starstatus on Jan 2, 2009 2:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think we should start an "Over-reactors Anonymous"

Founding members know who they are.

Duane Thomas, Calvin Hill, Tony Dorsett, Emmitt Smith ... and now BOTH Marion Barber and Felix Jones

by DalaiLuke on Jan 2, 2009 11:38 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

44-6

React to that…

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Jan 2, 2009 3:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Truth about Romo

He plain and simple is more physically talented than mentally. He doesn’t learn. He forces himself to get away with the risky throw under pressure regardless of the consequences. He admitted so much when asked about his golf game…..going into the final round, ahead on the leaderboard he refuses to lay up and manage the green. Then as pressure is mounting, his lead surmounted ,he continues to force shots rather than play it safe.

His thoughts, expressed to Cowboys writer, was that he wants to make himself perform under those situations to prepare himself mentally for similar situations in football.

There are two ways to look at this of course;

A. You want your QB to play confident and take chances.
B. You want your QB to play it safe, minimize risks to manage the game.

Romo has made the cliche comment (after a win) that he’s just taking what the defense gives him. That’s not always true. In big games, late in the year he is more prone to take more than he’s being given.

I don’t believe there are any options at QB outside of the current roster, starting over is foolish at this point. But if this team is ever going to live up to expectations – The time shackle Romois now. Make him play within himself until he can be trusted thru December into January. If you just go back to 2003, when he got some time against the Cardinals he was making the same mistakes then that he’s making today. The only difference was a coach that wouldn’t put up with it.

http://www.dallasdesperados.com/docs/scouting_report_romo.html

“I don’t think he was much different than the others when they went in,” Parcells said. “He missed a sight adjust and decided to make that impulse throw down there in the red zone. When the play called was open he didn’t throw it. I don’t know what he was looking at. You’d have to ask him that.”

Consistency is key for any quarterback, but especially a young quarterback trying to make a name for himself. After completing his first three passes Saturday, Romo had three-straight incompletions. He did respond immediately, however, connecting with tight end Jason Witten on fourth-and-10 for 20 yards and a first down.

But, then came the interception and the Cowboys last hope at avoiding their first preseason shutout since 1994.

“It was just impulse play and that’s what I’m trying to get away from,” Romo said. “Coach Parcells talks about it, he doesn’t want the impulse throws and that’s exactly what it was. It was just a bonehead mistake and I’ve got to learn from it. He chewed me out pretty good.”

by Doomsday on Jan 3, 2009 9:01 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

disagree

Romo is highly intelligent…implulsive doesn’t equal dumb.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 3, 2009 5:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What's dumb is...

Continuing to be unnecessarily impulsive.

He’s like a dog that won’t stop peeing on the carpet. You gotta whack the dog with a newspaper, and sometimes you stick the dog’s nose in the pee to make your point.

Someone needs to whack Romo upside the head on the sideline after every boneheaded play.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Jan 3, 2009 7:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd call it instinctive

Bottom line is that if the play doesn’t break down because of shoddy OL play, he wouldn’t be in that position to begin with.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 4, 2009 12:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Pennington shows you what a good baltimore D

To a QB who prides himself on not turning the football over.

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 4, 2009 3:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

exactly

the quality of the defenses Romo had to face in December were beyond tough. Don’t see too many qbs performing well against thoses defenses with a poor pass blocking line.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 4, 2009 4:07 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

out of the teams fighting for a spot

by far we had the toughest schedule. 4 playoff teams all in contention, #1 seed and another #2 seed.

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 4, 2009 5:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Although my dog was dumb and impulsive. so one is not exclusive to the other.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Jan 6, 2009 7:07 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

describes it himself as boneheaded...last time i knew...BONEHEAD = DUMB

5 years later…..still boneheaded…..hmmmm…

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 3, 2009 7:31 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Is Cutler, and Ben R dumb?

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 3, 2009 10:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ben yes, Jury still out on Cutler

Ben gets away with it having that defense to bail him out….

Cutler is obviously home watching the playoffs from the couch but he’s progressing. Before Shanahan got fired I think he would have matured next season – now it’s in the air. Making proclomations that he’s got a better arm than whatever QB is immature and definitely and “dumb” indicator.

But along the same lines, Jake Plummer was exactly what we’re talking about here, great athleticism but could not learn from his mistakes and take care of the ball.

by Doomsday on Jan 4, 2009 11:25 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Question

If were up to you who would you draft Rhett Bomar, Graham Harrell, or Chase Daniels?

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 5, 2009 4:15 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I like Bomar the most

But I wouldn’t mind Harrell either.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Jan 5, 2009 9:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, because Texas Tech QB's have always done so well in the NFL

If you want to waste a pick, take a Texas Tech QB.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Jan 6, 2009 7:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

lol

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 6, 2009 9:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Harrell is the best fit for our system.....but he's on the light side....puts on about 10-15 lbs of muscle....he'd be perfect here as our #2

Bomar has to be the most overated i’ve seen in many years…….

Daniels is the grittiest, but too short……..but he’s a football player..and i’d take a shot at him if still there in rounds 6-7..

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 7, 2009 1:34 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

It's the Juniors that will be making all the waves....btw

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 7, 2009 1:35 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Tony Romo is Jake Plummer

Romo is good – about as good as Plummer was, you will think he can take you where you want to be, but he never will. He is good enough to fool you into thinking he is an elite QB, but he lacks a couple championship qualities. 1) He isnt a natural leader like an Aikman or a Staubach 2) He thinks its a game and plays it that way, he will never care about the game as much as you do 3) He is whimpy and careless, when it gets cold, he degrades, when he gets tired he gets careless with the football. Tony Romo is our Jake Plummer, and it will be 5 or 6 years before we all agree this is true.

by sam0807 on Jan 7, 2009 11:32 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Romo's numbers blow away Plummer's..its not even close

whimpy?? thats why he was wearing short sleeves in 7 degree weather…get a clue.

BTW, it is a game!

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 7, 2009 12:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Romo has much better weapons

He’d be worse than Plummer if he had worse numbers with players like T.O., Witten and RW11.

And he probably should’ve worn longer sleeves in Pittsburgh.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Jan 7, 2009 12:33 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

T.O. and RW are overrated as great weapons, they sure didn’t play like it this season regardless of the reason.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 7, 2009 12:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Save it

We saw what happened to the mighty Cowboys offense without T.O. last season, even when the O Line was humming — it absolutely came to a sputtering stop.

And I remember YOU, of all people, arguing that it was T.O. that made this offense go, otherwise Romo had noone open to throw to, waaah, waaah, ad infinitum. Boy, you backtrack quick, don’t you?

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Jan 7, 2009 1:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

he did last year, bit not this year

If anyone regressed this year, it was him.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 7, 2009 2:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The comparison is valid today

Let’s hope Romo has a better season next year, otherwise the label might stick.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Jan 7, 2009 12:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

-1

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 7, 2009 12:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Captain_small
NFL Power Rankins - Week 12 - Final Edition
Blue-koolaid_small
We've Got A Bully...It's Time To "Go Ralphie"
09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Why a Win is Not a Win
Captain_small
Seven Statistical Nuggets As December Looms
Mom_s_camera_081_small
A Special 'Thank You' to Grizz.

Recent FanPosts

Cowboy_small
"6 more games" or "Are we really the worst 7-3 team?"
Lil-00007305-sm_small
Oakland @ Dallas - A Trap Game if I ever saw one
Darren_woodson-the_real_hammer_2_small
What weaknesses do you see in this Pass Offense of ours?
Small
Remember...The only thing that matters is how we're playing heading into January.
Small
Two Questions for Vela and Grizz
Small
New Captain Comeback?
Tom-landry-at_small
Is Cowboys' Close Victory Over Redskins Reason To Worry?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher