Cowboys @ Steelers: What They're Saying
Welcome to a somber edition of What They're Saying - but with a dash of optimism. There's no getting away from the feeling that we left money on the table after that game. A record of 9-4 looks miles away from our current 8-5 in this pile-up for the NFC wild card. Heck, we could have even entertained thoughts of catching the Giants in the division by beating them on Sunday night, if we had held on against the Steelers. Then there's the psychological effect on the team, it can go one of two ways. A crushing loss that dashes their season or a galvanizing moment that points to post-season glory. Only the next few weeks will answer that question.
But the Cowboys players answered some questions from reporters after the game, so take the jump below to see what they thought.
Ah, Tony Romo. What to say about the kid from Wisconsin? Right now, I'd probably say think about ball security. The fact that Dallas turned the ball over five times, four by Romo, and was still in the game really speaks to the play on defense. If Romo took care of the ball we win this game. No, this loss isn't solely on Romo, special teams were an issue again, the defense stumbled at the end, the receivers were having issues with some routes and Cory Procter had to play (never a good sign).
We know what Romo can do when he's on his game. So we wait for him to turn it on in December and the playoffs. He's the QB for me, but I can't ignore the problems he's had late in seasons. This year, show something new Tony. Still, you got to love the guy especially when he takes full responsibility for what happened, even the last INT which was the stake through the heart.
"This one's on me," said Romo, who threw three picks and lost a fumble. "As a quarterback, you can't turn the ball over that many times and expect to win, especially in an environment like this."
Romo's best buddy on the team covered for him by taking the blame.
"It's totally on me, completely," said [Jason] Witten, who was the first player to talk in the locker room and repeated the message to a different group of reporters after getting dressed. "Tony trusted me on that, and I slipped coming out of the break. He threw it exactly where it was supposed to go, and I cost us the game.
"You dream about those situations. You want the ball in your hands. We had success on it earlier. The quarterback has confidence to come to you, and you come and slip out of the break.
"It was all on me."
Romo was having none of it.
"It doesn't matter whether it was a slip or a miscommunication," he said. "I threw it where he wasn't. That's on me.
"We didn't win. If I had done a few things differently, we would have won."
He knows, and we can only hope that this was a potent reminder not to get sloppy with the football the rest of the season. We still need him to make plays and occasionally dazzle us like the TD to T.O., but turnovers will beat any team along the way and we can't afford to lose again.
The Cowboys defense managed to cause two turnovers, only to be trumped by the five given way by the offense and special teams. But the defense still managed to hold the Cowboys in the game and made a brilliant goal line stand in the fourth quarter that looked like it might be the game-winner. Even Pittsburgh fans I've talked to thought that was going to be the defining moment in the game. A guy who made a big play on the stand is the same guy whose game has elevated recently. He was involved in both Pittsburgh turnovers. Bradie James has been playing out of his head recently.
"People were talking about their defense, and we weren't getting any credit," Bradie James said. "I definitely think we stepped up to the plate and showed up today and made plays.
"But we didn't make enough plays to win."
Ah, not enough to win. That's the kicker, although you could say they did make the plays to win but the offense and special teams decided to nullify that performance. But these guys aren't saying that.
"It's not enough if you don't win," Marcus Spears said. "There's nothing you can say to make it feel better."
"I think we're finally coming together," Zach Thomas said. "But still, we're inconsistent on a couple of drives. That's it. You can't give up the big play."
Indeed, they gave up a few big plays, including the much talked about third and 16 bomb to Santonio Holmes that revived the Steelers flagging hopes and flipped the field for what was about to come. Terence Newman was the culprit and Wade Phillips was pretty pointed in his frustration over that play.
"That was the one that cost us," Cowboys coach Wade Phillips said. "We could've shut them down. That was the big play that really hurt us, and that was inexcusable."
Marcus Spears:
"It's always in these types of games, it's always one or two plays," Cowboys defensive end Marcus Spears said. "It's back and forth and whoever makes the mistake probably is going to lose. We did. We made the mistake. We did it to ourselves."
He could just as easily be talking about the special teams. The Cowboys resorted to form on special teams by allowing a big punt return, touching the ball on a punt resulting in a turnover and some suspect punting by Sam Paulescu. Plus, as good as Adam Jones was while breaking up passes, he tried to ruin it with below-average returns and one muff that he was lucky to recover. What's he doing fielding a punt at the five for anyway? The Cowboys special teams help us lose a game again, one can only wonder if they will cost us a playoff shot.
Meanwhile, back over on offense, one receiver wasn't happy.
"All I can do is run my routes," T.O. said. "It's [the QB's] job to go out there and assess what the defense is, and he made that decision."
That was in response to questions about the final play, where Romo went to Witten when T.O. thought he had something going on and replays showed that Crayton was also open for the catch. As long as Romo doesn't take the bait, which I'm sure he won't, it's just T.O. being T.O.
More from the animated one:
"We can't allow those things to happen," T.O. said. "The defense played a hell of a ballgame. We stunk it up on the offense. When you have turnovers, it's hard to win the game."
Nothing to see here, just move along you looky-loo's.
I guess the positive surprise of the game besides the defense was the play of rookie Tashard Choice. The kid can ball! 88 yards rushing and 78 yards receiving, all while providing some great blocks in pass protection. When Marion Barber gets back he might find himself sharing time again. Choice was happy with his game, but losing trumps all.
"It don't even mean nothing," Choice said. "It means something as far as the coaches understanding what I can do, but, man, all I care about is winning and losing. I could have had a terrible game, and if we won the game, I would have had a smile on my face. But when you lose, it takes it all out of you. All it makes you want to do is go back and work harder."
The Steelers gave props to the kid, too.
"He's a pretty good back. We knew that," [Lamar] Woodley said. "When he saw a hole he hit it, so you have to give him props. He ain't in the NFL for nothing."
On a tangent of the Barber/Choice combo, what is Jerry Jones doing calling out his own player to the press?
"[Barber] can play with that injured toe," Jones said. "He can play with the soreness and a combination of those things. I see nothing that led us to believe he couldn't."
Just chill, Jerry. Right now, we don't need an internally driven issue to crop up. We need all hands on deck for a playoff drive.
"I would say you needed to win to really be able to affirm it," owner and general manager Jerry Jones said, "but these guys fought and played tough in tough circumstances up here. I would make the argument we would've had to win the next three anyway. That's where we are."
That's more like it.
So we lost a game we easily could have won, we blew a chance at pulling away from the pack in the playoff hunt, we lost out on the incredible momentum that would come from a four-game win streak and threw away the confidence that would come from beating a team like Pittsburgh, on their turf, in the elements. That's the sober truth. But the dash of optimism is that we actually moved up in the playoff race (thanks for losing Atlanta and Washington) and we can still pretty much write our own ending to the season.
"We don't know how the season's going to end," said quarterback Tony Romo, whose third interception of the game was returned for the winning touchdown with 1:40 to play. "Other teams have been in this position and gone on to win the Super Bowl. Other teams have been in this position and not made the playoffs. The story will be written here at the end.
"We have, I think, a chance to write our own story. I don't think it's completely out of our hands."
Start writing next Sunday, Tony.
87 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You know its all well and good to say.......
..It ‘s my fault, from Witten I accept the apology because he is who he is an consistently does what he does: from Tony I do not accept the words and for the same reasons. I’m not a Romo hater, but then again I am a Romo critic and have been waiting for him to take that final step and I’m still waiting. Maybe he needs to quit having so much fun and treat it more like a job? IDK.
…..and as far as the defense goes, yes they played lights out and I give them props, but it wasn’t like they were playing the number 1 offence, but they did good.
The avg starting field position of the steeler's was near mid field almost the entire game,
ironic when they finally score a TD it was from back in their own territory.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
To all who think
that Romo does not have it in him to win in crunch time. The next three games should settle the argument. NY, Bal and Phi all have good Def and will test romo, it will be a playoff atmosphere for the next three weeks. Personally I am wondering health-wise what players will be back for this game? Could M Austin, M Jenkins, M Barber be back? This is going to be the three longest weeks of my life watching how this all plays out.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
Jenkins and Austin
would really help the return game. Gosh that unit blew yesterday!
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:14 PM CST up reply actions
It was playoff atmosphere yesterday
He’s a few yards behind and a bit late to the game if he thinks the first “playoff” game is next week.
Really?
It’s not often you get two guards injured like we did (Holland and Kosier)
The only two needs as I see it are SS and NT. And to be honest SS is not that much of a need. Keith Davis has been a fairly good starter thus far at SS.
Dallas needs for me in the draft
QB, Guard, Nose tackle, Safety,inside Linebacker, corner, receiver, defensive end/linebacker
I say a ballhawking FS
Safety again, G, NT, QB, ILB
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:15 PM CST up reply actions
I think Henry is moving to free safety next year
but i’d still draft another ball hawk safety, and that’s why I think we need another corner to take henry’s spot when Henry moves to free safety full time..
Ratliff should be moved to defensive end, Tank is nothing special, we need a big space eating nose tackle..
NT
I think Ratliff has played the best of anyone
by joey7289 on Dec 8, 2008 12:11 PM CST up reply actions
Yes but I would rather him and Ware play on the same side
that would be impossible for opposing offenses to block. And even if he remains at NT I don’t know if Tank will be here next year.
ok
that would be nice, there are some big NT’s coming out in the draft this year so we’ll see, i hope tank comes back he’s been playing better with every game.
by joey7289 on Dec 8, 2008 12:14 PM CST up reply actions
I feel like he will probably want to test the open market and try to get a
starting job somewhere else
maybe
i just don’t see him getting big money to start, he hasn’t shown enough, but that is just my opinion
by joey7289 on Dec 8, 2008 12:16 PM CST up reply actions
ok ok
i see where your going, who knows, i hope he stays but if he doesn’t oh well
by joey7289 on Dec 8, 2008 12:18 PM CST up reply actions
If we're talking needs...
…which it seems a bit early to do: We need a tackle (even if we re-sign Columbo), and we need a safety, as Raf has said many many times. The only way I see that changing is if we move Henry to safety full-time, and then maybe it’s not as pressing a need.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
Maybe its time to try McQ at guard.
Since Proctor doesnt seem to be able to hold up at the point of attack, maybe we can put McQ in at guard and have Free be the swing tackle during game day. I know they have been looking at McQ at guard for the last couple of training camps. Maybe the time is now for that test.
That's what I'm saying.
I know McQ has played G in the past. He’s got to be better than Proctor. They’ll never know how he’ll do if they don’t give it a shot.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 3:09 PM CST up reply actions
Yes, Your right. they tried him out at guard against Minn.
and your right he looked like pretty bad and so did free at tackle. Others have said it and so have I, our back up O linemen are really sub par. I don’t really know why either because Free and Martin ( who is gone now ) were actually rated pretty high, not first day selections, but well ahead of most. I hope we can find a brute late or a unexpected surprise in UDFA.
Oh... if I saw the play I could try and diagnose the injruy
Cowboys fan since 1978.. I was 3 years old
yeah
i think he limped off the field, probably something like a knee sprain
by joey7289 on Dec 8, 2008 12:15 PM CST up reply actions
He was face down
and looked to be in a ton of pain. No pun intended on “ton”.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:16 PM CST up reply actions
That is what N. Eatman said on the lunch break and that he was
limping badly, probably get an MRI today.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
great
we can’t catch a break injury wise this year
by joey7289 on Dec 8, 2008 12:18 PM CST up reply actions
That's pretty much expected
when you play in Pitt.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:19 PM CST up reply actions
So he should be back by the Superbowl!
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:19 PM CST up reply actions
Wade actually said it was an ankle.
Dunno if he’s mistakin, but it be a pretty foolish mistake to diagnose that wrong.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 3:10 PM CST up reply actions
I would go with WP, what Nick said was a leymans guess
after the plane ride back.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
yes, I am more than just a little concerned , seemed like he ...
actually helped make some running room on the left side.
I saw on one passing play against Harrison
he blocked him when he tried to come inside off of Flo, and then Holland blocked him a 2nd time—pretty relentlessly.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:23 PM CST up reply actions
Accept it
Accept it that this seasons is testing us. Everything that we are doing is falling apart and we still are fighting. That is the spirit. That is the winning attitude and this is what it takes to get where we want to be.
Agree, we have some lapses and some weaknesses but who doesn’t. Show me a perfect football team and I will show you one that has no place in NFL. The Patriots from last year, seemed perfect, but the Giants figured out a way to beat them.
Agree, Romo had a bad day. I am happy that we lost. Call me crazy but now I am excited that we lost and that Newman gave up a big one in the last quarter. As I said during the game blog, “Don’t leave T-New wounded. Either kill him or don’t run past him at all because he sure is going to come back and get it from you”. The next game will be big. Some one has to pay for our loss. It may just be the Giants. I feel bad for them and I am not being nasty here mind you :-)
All said and done, In Romo We Trust!!
by letsgogetonefellas on Dec 8, 2008 12:07 PM CST reply actions
Yup.
Keeps the level of competition up, so we can do something in the playoffs provided we get there.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:22 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah
With the way the defense played, and I feel this defense is here to stay, we will always be in games, that excites me. Just need the Garrett to wake up and we’ll be fine.
by joey7289 on Dec 8, 2008 12:24 PM CST up reply actions
Someone needs to shake him hard to wake him up.
by letsgogetonefellas on Dec 8, 2008 12:32 PM CST up reply actions
yes
because that play calling was worse then bad yesterday, i can’t count how many times we went, run, pass pass. run, pass, pass. just predictable, and he wasn’t suppose to be
by joey7289 on Dec 8, 2008 12:37 PM CST up reply actions
I don't remember the last time I've seen him go
run, run, pass—without it being in garbage time. With our RBs and the D playing the way it has been, you’d think he want to control the ball more, especially since Romo’s accuracy was off yesterday.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:47 PM CST up reply actions
He is just not adaptive. He is good. He is genius. He is not adaptive. It's like he is good in theory but not in practice.
by letsgogetonefellas on Dec 8, 2008 12:52 PM CST up reply actions
Should be running more at this time in the season.
You pass a bunch in practice to keep Romo and the WRs on the same page, and dominate the line of scrimmage on gameday.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:58 PM CST up reply actions
Agreed
Offline friend and I were having the same thoughts. RBX can make a game plan, but cannot adapt live. The way Choice was moving the ball, he should have been calling runs every other down. Hell, take the load OFF of Romo’s shoulders once in while. Problem was, his game plan called for Romo to be the deciding factor and sure enough, he was.
One last time: “having a bad day” is not a viable excuse, nor is it excusable on a championship quality team. “Bad days” on a team with it’s sights set on the playoffs, mean not making the playoffs, or losing the playoff game. That is NOT what champions do. Losers have bad days.
I will call you crazy
When you say you are happy we lost. But I agree with mostly everything you are saying. Last year we coasted through the regular season, and didn’t think we had to do anything differently come playoff time. This year every win is appreciated more, and if we make the playoffs, it will be an extremely hard fought battle that the team will appreciate much more. We are constantly looking on things to improve, making us a more diverse team, rather than last year just steam-rolling everyone in our path, not changing anything.
just wondering
and i know it didn’t cost us the game but on that one punt did anyone else think that ball touched a steeler before it touched a cowboy, i mean yes we shot ourselves in the foot with no time outs, just something that bothered me.
by joey7289 on Dec 8, 2008 12:10 PM CST reply actions
I didn't see that, but would be interested to look again.
I also thought that offsides penalty on Ellis was total B.S.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:20 PM CST up reply actions
agreed
but i am almost 100 percent positive it hit a hand before us, idk for sure, fox showed one replay.
by joey7289 on Dec 8, 2008 12:21 PM CST up reply actions
Still
that’s picky. That happens 1000 times a weekend. He may have been a centimeter over.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:25 PM CST up reply actions
My big question is on the Steelers game tying drive
They hurried to the line to get a play off and we didn’t challenge a pass that I thought hit the dirt. Of course, I never saw a replay but it def came in low…obviously it doesn’t matter now, but I’m curious…
by AikmanNailedMySis on Dec 8, 2008 12:15 PM CST reply actions
Think we were outta challenges at that point.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:21 PM CST up reply actions
What about Spears?
He looks to be upping his level of play and a helluva team leader. I liked that he was the one pumping up the D before the game.
George Teague did it all.
as of now
he’s staying and canty is going bye bye
by joey7289 on Dec 8, 2008 12:27 PM CST up reply actions
He looks to get better leverage than Canty
allowing him to get better penetration. Canty’s so tall though that he can knock down passes at the line with his facemask! I say keep em both if affordable, and start Rat over Canty.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 8, 2008 12:50 PM CST up reply actions
I always liked Spears and I think he is going to make a great leader for this D now or a year down the line.
by letsgogetonefellas on Dec 8, 2008 12:33 PM CST up reply actions
never
really a fan but has certainly grown on me, playing a hell of a lot help.
by joey7289 on Dec 8, 2008 12:38 PM CST up reply actions
Tony Romo - Brett Farve
I think Tony watched too much Farve in the past. JK. Farve was/is an awesome QB but the yips and yikes were always there. Forcing the ball, turnovers, turnovers. When he has a good game, good luck trying to beat him. There are so many times when he lost games by the INT. Romo is following in his footsteps. I really hope Romo can mature past the turnovers, Brett never really did until last year.
He can
I personally don’t believe in choke artists to a certain extent. Some will definitely disagree with me, but I think that is the first time Romo actually choked AS a quarterback (forget the holder situation). Romo did not even have a bad game against the Giants last year, you couldn’t expect him to win that game himself when the giants d-line was in his face all game. Romo is not a choke artist, he will choke once in a while, like every QB. Not to mention, i believe he has about 7 game-winning drives in his career so far.
Jerry Jerry Jerry
What the heck is he doing calling out Barber? Wasn’t it the coaching staff who wanted him to sit?
According to WP it was the training staff who said that barber should sit out
due to calf soreness from trying to run differently.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
Hmmm
No, this loss isn’t solely on Romo..
Really?
special teams were an issue again
Blame that on the offensive play-calling. Why did Garrett call a draw play on 3rd and 6 instead of a passing play?
the defense stumbled at the end
Blame that on the prevent defense being called during the 4th quarter. Why doesn’t Wade trust his defense more?
the receivers were having issues with some routes
Again blame that on Garrett’s play-calling, he doesn’t know how to design good routes for the recievers.
~Texas Massacre 08~
-1
Romo’s inability to throw yesterday hand cuffed JG, if Romo was remotely accurate; we probably throw it on 3rd Down. Perfect example is Romo’s pick 6 at the end of the game.
"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"
Also...
You said
Romo’s inability to throw yesterday hand cuffed JG
…Well then why with 6:35 left in the game on their own 40 yd line, was a pass play called on 2nd and 9? Romo was sacked for a 6 yard loss.
So don’t tell me Romo handcuffed JG’s play-calling.
~Texas Massacre 08~
I think blaming Garrett for our receivers own stupidity is ridiculous
And how do you know Garrett called a draw? Maybe Romo saw something and changed the play. It’s really hard to decide who is to blame for those things sitting where we are at.
yeah, really
ESPN broke down the play and not only did Witten slip and break off the router incorrectly, but Colombo got beat inside allowing a LB to be in Romo’s face so he had to release the ball high.
Romo is to be blamed because he threw the pick, but its not like he had a clean pocket and the receiver ran a perfect route.
In Romo we Trust

by 




















