Moss & T.O.?

by Starred4Life on Feb 25, 2008 4:32 PM CST Comment 9 comments

Thought this was interesting, and might provoke some discussion:

FoxSports.com's John Czarnecki writes that Randy Moss and the Patriots aren't really close on a new contract.

The Czar is known for some off the wall stuff, but this makes enough sense. Patriots reportedly believe that Moss will give them a chance to match any offer. It's uncertain who might go after Moss, but Denver and Dallas have been mentioned.

Source: http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7...

Now there's a WR who could stretch the field for us!

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

0 recs | Comment 9 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Do a little research, Czar

There is no way that the Boys could sign Moss and even a cursory glance at cap room would tell him that. Classic lazy "journalism."

by grapejoos on Feb 25, 2008 4:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

why can't fans understand you can't pay

top dollar to 2 players at the same position, it would kill your cap. We don't need Moss, we need a solid speed guy who will keep T.O. from being double covered.

You can't have all pros at every position.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Feb 25, 2008 7:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

Unless you consistently draft them

You can't have all pros at every position.

Not necessarily voted all pro (popularity contest), but players who have "all pro" talent.

If you successfully hit on 4 of your draft picks every year, occationally re-signed a few, you could have all 22 starters with "all-pro" talent in about 6 years.

I can dream, can't I ?

by DeRat on Feb 25, 2008 10:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

hittin on most of your draft picks is dreamin

as Parcells says, its a 50-50 proposition at best.

I have yet to see a team successfully hit on 4 of their draft picks every year. I've seen teams very successful at hitting on their first rd picks on a consistent basis (Colts, Steelers, Ravens) but not 4 per year.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Feb 26, 2008 9:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs