Blueprint for success spells disaster
I am so disappointed when sportswriters I respect turn out drivel like Rick Gosselin did in this article. Gosselin jumps to a conclusion faster than Paris Hilton jumps on a table. I wonder if he used a Tom Smykowski "Jump to Conclusions Mat" for this preposterously un-prescient prediction.
His premise is the rest of the league can use the New York Giants 2007 season that resulted in a Super Bowl win as a blueprint for future success. Balderdash! To anybody who wants to try this method, I would also recommend walking a tight-rope across two forty-story buildings without a balancing pole in the middle of a hurricane while sloppy drunk. Your chances of success are about the same.
Goose makes the claim that you win in the NFL by being a team, not by collecting stars. On the surface that seems reasonable enough. The NFL is the ultimate team sport so the idea sounds like a good theory. But when he tries to make the New York Giants of 2007 the prime example and uses the Cowboys 13 Pro-Bowlers as the counterweight it all comes crashing down like a house built with a faulty blueprint.
Here’s the recommendation according to Goose’s plan. Get yourself a coach who is within minutes of being fired over the offseason and early in the season. Don’t sign any prominent free-agents to fill in your holes. Have a QB who led the league in turnovers. Play mediocre ball for most of the season. Then wait for that team to turn it all round heading into the playoffs. Watch them reel off four straight victories in the playoffs (three of them on the road), pulling-off improbable upsets against the #1 and #2 seed in their own conference then do it again against the most dominant team in the NFL for that season in the Super Bowl. Yep, that happens all the time. I mean, what idiot wouldn’t believe that’s the full-proof way to win a Super Bowl? It’s so logical that I can’t believe no franchise ever thought of it before. So start your engines NFL teams and jump on the bandwagon, this is the way to go.
Don’t be fooled by big free-agent signings like Bigg Davis, who helped turn the Cowboys from a 9-7 team to a 13-3 team. That’s dumb, instead keep a broken-down guard like Marco Rivera and watch your team miraculously turn into Super Bowl Champs. Don’t fool around with playmakers and the like, that’s just asking for trouble. Instead, make sure you only have one Pro-Bowler because that’s how Super Bowl champions are made. Don’t bother me with facts like the Colts winning the year before with over five Pro-Bowlers and a bunch of superstars, ditto the Pittsburgh Steelers the year before, or the New England Patriots the years before that. That’s for suckers. Nope, the new way is too ride the lightning and hope you don’t get toasted.
This isn’t to take anything away from what the New York Giants did this year. When the chips were down they came together and played inspired football. There was nothing lucky about it, they earned everything they got. But do you really think that it’s a good idea to try and mimic what they did this year as a blueprint? How many teams over the years do you think were in similar situations as the Giants who crashed-and-burned and were swept into the dustbin of history. Probably more than you can count. This kind of thinking reminds me of last year when after the Super Bowl it was all the rage to say that getting a nice, lovable, player’s coach is the blueprint of the future because Tony Dungy and Lovie Smith took their teams to the ultimate game. Yeah, how’d that work out this year? Bill Belichick and Tom Coughlin, those noted teddy-bears, sure made that theory look good. You can counter that Coughlin lightened-up this year but I can tell you he wasn’t Teddy Ruxpin.
If you want to say that having a team is more important than collecting superstars, you may have a point. But if you’re going to point to this year’s Giants as some kind of blueprint for success in future seasons and as a GM or coach actually try it, then you’ll probably be asking customers if they'd like to super-size that after the season is over. The NFL will truly stand for "Not For Long" as the ever-quotable Jerry Glanville once stated.
Don’t hire Goose Gosselin to build your house with his blueprint unless living under 6-feet of tumbling bricks is your idea of a good time.

Nick Eatman details the wait for our final assistant coaches.
Tim Cowlishaw says the Cowboys are truly lamenting an opportunity lost this year.
0 recs |
19 comments
Comments
I'll be happy
when all this talk of 'blueprints' is put to rest. While the NFL is a copycat league, every single team cannot and should not mimic what the current SB winner did. A different type of team wins it all nearly every year. The 2007 Giants are different than the 2006 Colts, as well at the 2005 Steelers, as well as the 2004-2003 Patriots, as well as the 2002 Buccaneers, and so on...
It's like during the regular season when Philly and Baltimore nearly beat NE, people said that all the other teams should do what they did. Well, easier said than done. Every team doesn't use the same defensive schemes as those two teams, nor do they have the same personnel (players, coaches) as those two teams.
by Nelson on Feb 5, 2008 11:10 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Most important blueprint step...
by mleklund on Feb 5, 2008 11:54 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I happen to agree to some extent
The Giants line had a lot to do with Brady's poor performance, but there were a handful of throws that Brady usually makes with ease that were awful. And these throws came when he wasn't under pressure. He also didn't seem to be throwing the intermediate to deep balls as well as he usually does.
Again, the Giants defense was fantastic and had a lot to do with Brady's poor performance. But I also think his ankle wasn't right and he was having trouble pushing off on it.
by Dave Halprin on Feb 5, 2008 11:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I concur
The Giants D line, especially Tuck, was spectacular, but there were missed chances on throws that Brady usually makes. And with a 3 point difference, probably a healthy Brady makes all the difference.
And while were on the subject, how do you get the oposing coach to go for it on 4th and 13 instead of taking the field goal?
by mleklund on Feb 5, 2008 12:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
any blueprint
involves a QB who doesnt choke and makes the most of his talents. probably helps that trips to cabo with a bimbo during the playoffs are avoided too.
by GoBigD on Feb 5, 2008 12:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
boy somebody is really jealous of Jessica
by Terry on Feb 5, 2008 12:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I couldn't have said it better myself!
All of this talk about blueprints is pure hogwash! there is no blueprint, except for the one that says don't commit stupid penalties, don't turn the ball over and tackle well. Oh, and catch the ball when it hits you in the hands!
by John Boy on Feb 5, 2008 12:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The Giants were lucky Shockey got injured
I think if he plays in the playoffs, they aren't the same team and the Giants crash and burn.
Shockey I think always intimidated Eli to the point Eli felt it necessary to always look his way when Shockey would whine for the ball. Without Sheckey, Eli could take command of the huddle and the offense and play within himself.
The Giants are a feel good story right now and idiots like Gooselin are being sucked in to all of this nonsense. The fact is the Giants will again struggle to make the playoffs like the do every year and next year will be no different. The Giants are the 2005 Steelers and we all know what has happened to them since their championship.
by Terry on Feb 5, 2008 12:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
A couple of things
- If Patrick Crayton keeps running on that now infamous play this entire article makes him look silly for wanting to blue print a team that lost to the Cowboys three times in one season.
- If the Patriots CB's could catch a football his article would have been all about the idea that mixing the right players into a scheme can make unbeatable.
- The Cowboys would beat the Giants 70% of the time if they played them everyday for the next year.
- Eli Manning is still a dufus.
by DCFanatic on Feb 5, 2008 12:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Gosselin wears an NFL jersey comprised of every
team's logo and colors. This guy is spread so thin around the league that it's a wonder than he doesn't snap.
by Wharter on Feb 5, 2008 12:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Greggo: "Fuhgettaboutit!!!"
Just came across this...
Jacksonville radio station 1010XL is reporting that the Jaguars have added former Redskins assistant head coach-defense Gregg Williams to their coaching staff.
Williams will reportedly get the title of defensive coordinator and assistant head coach. He replaces Mike Smith, who left Jacksonville to become head coach of the Atlanta Falcons.
For the rest of the story, click below:
http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumor...
by kcbrett5 on Feb 5, 2008 1:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You have to love this guys
Five weeks ago Eli Manning was a no good, dopey bust of a quarterback. Now, after having a good, not great Super Bowl he is a GREAT QB..LMAO!!
If Eli turns into the Eli we really know after the first month of next season than the cry's of bust will come once again.
by Cowboys81 on Feb 5, 2008 2:57 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
One blueprint from the Gmen
that I like is drafting quality cornerbacks. I think four decent CB's is better than 1 shutdown and 3 mediocre CB's. They have four servicable CB's who were all drafted in the first two rounds. Granted some were veteran signings, but it seems like you need three if not four decent CB's now. Why do we have a penchant for 6th, 7th and free agent CB's? How many of those hit? And don't say Mario Edwards.
by BigE on Feb 5, 2008 3:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I have to say those guys really stepped up
in the playoffs. Looked nothing like they did in the regular season.
by Terry on Feb 5, 2008 3:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Is it safe to say
that Rick has got to be one of the most overrated sports "journalists" out there? I cannot honestly say that I have ever read one of his articles and come away feeling like I knew more after reading it than I did beforehand. For some reason, people tend to hold this guy up as some great journalist - I think he's a hack.
To think that he is the guy responsible for "fighting" for Cowboys to get into the Hall of Fame makes me sick to my stomach. Shouldn't that guy, in some sense, be a homer? How can we get Spags into that role? Don't you have to, at least, like your team to be resonsible for footballs' greatest honor? Jeez.....no wonder the Hall has so few Cowboys in it - this guy is our frontman?
by huslinone on Feb 5, 2008 4:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You summed up that jerk's resume' in
a nutshell.
by Wharter on Feb 5, 2008 5:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Goose
Does the media report insightful articles anymore or is it just shock journalism? DCFanatic makes good points but what I take from the Giants is this:
Their 1st pick of a few years ago (manning) played well.
Their BIG free agent pickup from a few years past (plax) played well.
Their money ends (strahan, Osi) made a big difference.
Just as important, top end draft picks played well (webster, steve smith)
Let's not kid ourselves. Once they start losing again, Coughlin's stuff will get old. Let's not overanalyze. If we had a WR (any receiver beyond TO) that could catch and a decent 3rd corner, we'd be talking about the Cowboys blueprint.
by JMan on Feb 5, 2008 4:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Fantastically written Grizz
I could feel the venom in that post! I too am sooo tired of hearing how great the Giants' 'blueprint' is now.
But a small part of me is glad this happened, as false success can be very damaging for a long time.
To me, Super Bowl XLII Eli was the same Eli he's been his entire career. If not for two dropped INTs, Eli would have had his requisite 3 INTs for the game. I'll just go ahead and say it: outside of Trent Dilfer, Eli Manning is the worst QB I've ever seen win the Super Bowl (to clarify, I can only claim to have intelligently watched 22 SBs).
I say, "sign that kid to an extension now!," because I just can't believe the Giants will ever pull-off anything remotely close to what they did this year with Eli at the helm. In my opinion, Eli is the type of QB that just hamstrings franchises for years due to his on again/off again performances. I know he just won a ring, but I hardly credit Eli as the reason.
Sure, it's a fantastic story, but is so because what they did this year was so improbable and--more importantly--hardly repeatable.
by Starred4Life on Feb 5, 2008 6:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Absurdly simplistic analysis
Hi all, first time poster... and a die-hard Giants fan. Had to sign up for an account here after I read this post and the linked article.
Just who is this fool Gosselin, anyway? Is he really soft in der kopf or is he simply a lazy SOB who just likes to mail in his columns?
So "teamwork" was the key to Big Blue's success this year? Wow, I guess all those after practice Kumbaya-aroud-the-campfire-sessions really paid off for Coughlin and Spagnuolo this year. Or, maybe it was the team field trip to Six Flags after the Minnesota loss this year...
Look, it's real simple, you don't win in this league without good player personnel - and lots of it. Superstars will help you win so long as they're healthy. Which is why depth is actually just as important. And if there is one striking difference between this year's Giants and last year's, it's depth. My God, they just had a draft for the ages. Every one of the eight players drafted by first year GM Jerry Reese made the roster. Five of them made significant contributions late in the year and during New York's playoff run: 1st round CB Aaron Ross; 2nd round WR Steve Smith; 3rd round NT Jay Alford; 5th round TE Kevin Boss; 7th round RB Ahmad Bradshaw. Without any one of those guys, the Giants probably don't even make it to the Big Dance, let alone win it all.
So you wanna draw up a blueprint from the Giants success, here it it is: Draft lots of guys who can play. If they're good enough, they'll stick on the roster and should be able to step in and produce when one of your main guys gets hurt. Wow! Wotta revolutionary concept! Man, I probably shouldn't even be posting this in case your owner/GM Jerrah reads this blog. I certainly wouldn't want this secret to fall into his hands!
And, oh yeah, Strahan was right. You guys were by far and away our toughest opponent this year. You pounded the snot out of us twice before losing a squeaker in the playoffs. Next year's matchups should be fun. But we'll be ready - and so will I for any smack talk that I'm sure you'll be flinging my way!
by bigblueblood on Feb 5, 2008 10:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 























