Cowboys roster evaluation: OT
Dallas Cowboys offensive tackle roster evaluation.
OT
Starter: Flozell Adams – Flozell Adams has a long history with the Cowboys but is currently an unrestricted free agent. The Cowboys organization has a decision to make in terms of the amount of money and the length of a possible contract for Flozell and they have to balance that against potential offers he could receive from other teams. Adams has been somewhat of an enigma during his career in Dallas. He possesses a ton of talent and has the physical size to engulf pass rushers; playing left tackle generally leaves him up against the opposing defense’s best pass rusher. Throughout his career he’s had games/seasons when he’s been a dominant left tackle, but he’s also had times – granted much less time - when he looks totally outmatched and unmotivated. Coming off of injury in the 2006 season, it looked like he would never again reach the plateau of great play he had shown previously. Then last year, he turned in an excellent season proving once again that when he’s on his game he can play with the best of them.
Protecting Tony Romo’s blindside is about as important a job as there is on the Cowboys team. If Flozell continues to play like he did last year then the re-signing him would be a no-brainer. But Flozell’s history of inconsistency and his advancing age should give the Cowboys some pause at breaking the bank to get him re-signed. They’ve reached a crossroads, do you go with what you know or do you trust your draft picks – and the Cowboys have spent a couple of draft picks at the tackle position – and go younger? I guess it all depends on what Flozell wants to stay in Dallas and he has said recently he would like to end his career here. But other teams who might be a player or two away from contending could see Flozell as the answer to their left tackle problems and throw a huge contract at him. My gut says re-sign him if it is at all reasonable, but if the price is too high or the length of contract too prohibitive, you have to go with your young players. This is one of the trickiest situations the Cowboys will face this offseason and they need to get it right. The Cowboys also will rely on the advice of new o-line coach Hudson Houck who had Flozell as a young player; this could influence the decision to keep him. Oh yeah, I’m not even going to discuss Flozell’s propensity for jumping offsides, it’s just a given you have to live with if he’s on your team.
Starter: Marc Colombo – Colombo was resurrected off the scrap heap by former coach Bill Parcells and has turned in to quite a find for the Cowboys. Right tackle had been a constant problem for the Cowboys but now that Colombo has settled into the position the Cowboys have a player they can depend on. Colombo is scrapper, the kind of guy who will never give up on a play and will fight the opposing player to the end. His play at right tackle along with Flozell’s on the other side gave Tony Romo the confidence to stand in the pocket and know that he would have time to make his reads and work the ball downfield. Colombo has quietly worked up the ranks of right tackles in the league and seems to have left his devastating knee injuries far behind him. He will go into next season in the final year of a two-year contract he signed before last season. If he plays up to the level he did this year then the Cowboys would be foolish not to lock him into a long-term deal. He’s still relatively young and there’s no reason to assume his play will do anything but improve. He’s regained the strength that was sapped by the knee injury and game experience has allowed him to refine his technique. The Cowboys got a steal when they showed the patience to re-build Colombo’s career.
Doug Free – Free was rookie last year who showed a great deal of promise. I watched him in training camp and in the preseason and came away thoroughly impressed. In training camp during one-on-one drills he was able to hold his own with some of our best pass rushers. He has amazing feet and athleticism and used them to his advantage by staying between the pass rusher and the QB. If for some reason the Cowboys don’t re-sign Flozell Adams I think that Free would be the top-choice to take over at left tackle. (Unless the Cowboys do something silly like move Leonard Davis over to left tackle, an impulse I would hope they'd resist). It’s true that having an untested and relatively young player working at that crucial position would make me nervous but from what I’ve seen out of Free so far, I think that he would be capable of holding the fort while he grows as a player from actual game-experience. It would be risky, we haven’t seen him on a regular basis against some of the best in the league and we haven’t seen him hold up over the course of a regular season, but he shows tremendous potential.
Pat McQuistan – McQ is a solid backup but I’m not sure if he’ll ever be the kind of starter that you want playing on a regular basis. I’ve watched his play through a couple of training camps and preseasons so far and can tell he works very hard and is always trying to improve but I’m not convinced he has the ability to be an everyday starter. I’m not betting the farm on that though; he could be thrust into the starting lineup and perform admirably, but I already think that Doug Free is the superior lineman. It’s possible that McQ might be a better guard than he is tackle and his ability to play both those positions makes him a valuable reserve on gameday.
James Marten – Another rookie tackle selected last year, he had a miserable training camp in which he was beaten on a regular basis by the defense. He seemed slow in the feet and guessed too much about where the defender was going and was slow to recover if he guessed wrong. The coaches were constantly on him trying to get him to use proper technique but from the time I saw him it didn’t seem to improve. A year removed from rookie status and under the tutelage of new coach Hudson Houck may do a lot towards improving his play, but until I see evidence of that in the upcoming training camp/preseason I’m not convinced he will contribute much to the Cowboys. I hope time will prove me wrong on this one.
0 recs |
14 comments
Comments
Franchise Flo
I am starting to think the best option is to make Flozell the "franchise player", which would cost $7.4M. It would let Free have one more year of development without having to make a long-term, very expensive commitment to Flo. I just get the feeling that he is not going to be effective for 4-5 more years.
by cly on Feb 6, 2008 10:53 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree, I would be much more
comfortable with getting Free one more year under his belt before throwing him to the wolves. I trust Grizz in his assessment that Free will be a player someday, but getting one more year out of Flo would be the best option.
by Terry on Feb 6, 2008 1:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Set Flozell Free
Grizz, I have come to trust your judgment on player evaluation. Assuming you are correct on your analysis of Doug Free, then it is time to let Flozell go. The great teams trust their draft choices and know that they must move them into the starting lineup to replace aging veterans, even if it means parting with a guy a year earlier than they would prefer.
It’s so tough making the decision to sign that trusted veteran to a third contract. The second contract is a no-brainer when you have a stud at a critical position. But the third contract should only be offered when you are painted into a corner and have no other viable alternative because it is almost a given that the player’s production will decline over the term of the contract while the salary cap implication is huge from Day One and continues to get bigger each year.
Thanks for your write-up on Doug Free. You have really helped clarify my thinking. I’m now officially in the camp of letting Flozell go. Having an extra $7M in salary cap dollars would be huge to the Cowboys.
by Cowboy Louie on Feb 6, 2008 11:29 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I wish Flo played on the inside...
or even RT, because the decision would be much much easier. LT is just a position that can't be overlooked. It's absolutely crucial for Romo and the Cowboys. Think about the fact that Romo led (or was leading late in the season) the league in the yards per pass attempt. You simply cannot do this without a competent LT. Maybe Free is ready, but it's an uncertaintly that could be the difference between winning the Super Bowl or coming up short again.
The franchise designation is an option, but you also have to take into consideration how this effects a 32-33 year old player looking for one more long-term deal. If Flozell already has motivational issues, then "renting" him (even though it for a huge sum of money) for one year could cause Flo's level of play to drop.
Grizz, I couldn't agree more with you in the area of Marten. I went back and watched the combine tape of him after we drafted him and I was very discouraged. He doesn't drop his hips and plays too upright. His feet and therefore lateral movement are below average. He doesn't look like a natural athlete, so I question how much coaching and/or development is going to improve his play. I was very disappointed with the draft pick, and the fact that Doug Free was available a round later really shows how much of a reach pick this was....not to mention players like Ryan Harris (T-Notre Dame), Marcus McCauley (CB-Fresno St) and Jacoby Jones (WR/KR - Lane College) were still on the board!
by Fargo Cowboys on Feb 6, 2008 12:18 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Options
So as I understand things....
Option 1: Re-sign Flozell for a reasonable price (and w/o a prohibitive contract duration)
If that doesn't work out....
Option 2: Use Free or McQ at LT and determine whether one of them can protect Romo's blindside
Now if that doesn't quite work out, what is the fall back...move Davis to LT and shuffle the whole line?
Before deciding that we can live w/o Flo, I would like to understand what we would do if Free or McQ can't quite cut it.
by lonpatrel on Feb 6, 2008 12:19 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Contingency Plan....
Now Ugoh was a 1st round selection, but I use this example because if Free is thrust into a starting role, he is more than likely going to have growing pains. Therefore, I think you have to know and trust what you have on the roster going into training camp. It's really no different than if Flo would have suffered another season ending injury in early August. Sure, Free and/or McQ would have struggled some, but one would hope that they would continue to improve throughout the season while playing at a reasonable level. With that said, game adjustments are just as important. If Free can't handle a certain DE from Alabama that now wears a blue jersey with the #72, we would have to adjust our protection schemes.
The bottomline is that we'll never keep Flo if he wants market value. Some team out there will pay him more than we can or will offer. But, if he wants to sign a cap friendly deal and finish his career with a star on his helmet, Jerry will find a way to keep him. Simple as that. And if he leaves, we move on trust that we have players on our roster that can fill the void or we consider using one of our first day selections to acquire another LT to compete with our 2nd and 3rd year players.
by Fargo Cowboys on Feb 6, 2008 12:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Flo either signs a 2 year deal or forget 'em...
Maybe I offer 3 year/21 million.....7 million bonus... the absolute most i'd pay him...I am sure other teams will offer even more...Take it or leave it...Need to know before free agency begins...If he sez no....I am on board with franchising him for one more season...I'd like to have his eventual replacement (Free) with one more training camp under his belt....
I would much much rather pay Alan Fanaca the 7-8 million per year to give us the best run mauler in the league, and have LT Free come right in with a warrior like Fanaca on his right wing at least. That would leave Kosier and McQuistan as very good depth...
I knew James Marten was a bust before we drafted him....another wasted OL pick (Rodgers,Perterman,etc,etc).....no more no more top 3 round o line picks please...4th-7th round or later for depth...
This years sleeper Heath Benedict / Newbury College...If he slides to the 4th-5th round......we snag him up....will eventually play guard, or right tackle for Columbo if not resigned. 6'6" 328lbs. keep an eye on him during combine.
by BoyzRback07 on Feb 6, 2008 4:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
McQ could be just like Colombo
NOT the most physically gifted player but someone with a motor that never quits and who never quits on a play. I say have McQ and Free battle it out for LT in camp and the winner gets the position. we need to husband our cap space for when we have to sign Newman and Ware in the near future. Maybe neither one of these guys will be as good as the Hotel BUT I also bet you will get more consistent performance and a LOT FEWER OFFSIDES.
by burmafrd1944 on Feb 6, 2008 5:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You are right, Grizz
Toughest call in the off-season outside of which Hollywood Hottie Romo should take on next. This is when you really rely on the coaches' eyes and hope they have enough information to make the right decision. Like most of you, I'd love for them to be able to release Flo because that would mean that they are pretty sure that Free is ready to go.
by dunkman on Feb 6, 2008 5:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm beginning to drift to the side
by Or Moyal on Feb 6, 2008 6:33 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Let FLO go
Invest the money
Give Free a shot at it and draft a guy at the end of round 1 or trade up in round 2
for one of these guys
Chris Williams, Vanderbilt (1/27)
Height: 6-6. Weight: 320.
40 Time: 5.13.
Arm: 32 7/8.
Projected Round: Top 20 Pick.
Mike Mayock labeled Chris Williams as his No. 3 offensive tackle in this class. After a solid Senior Bowl, Williams very well could be the third tackle taken.
Co-captain of Vanderbilt's football team, Williams simply doesn't allow sacks. His 40 at his size is remarkable.
this kid looked really good at the Senior Bowl
Gosder Cherilus, Boston College
Height: 6-6. Weight: 315.
40 Time: 5.08.
Arm: 35 5/8.
Projected Round: 2.
Rarely injured, Gosder Cherilus could be the third offensive tackle chosen in the top 15
Barry Richardson, Clemson
Height: 6-6. Weight: 331.
40 Time: 5.48.
Arm: 34 1/2.
Projected Round: 2.
A monstrous offensive tackle who has started 32 consecutive games.
by Arkcowboys on Feb 6, 2008 11:31 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Colombo
probably wants a new deal this offseason. When he signed the two year deal last year, Jerry talked about how he'd redo the deal if Colombo played really well again - at least that is what I remember.
by BigE on Feb 6, 2008 11:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Jerrah made a promise
to Colombo that if he played well for a whole season he would redo the deal. Jerrah keeps his promises and I have no problem locking up Colombo. while he is not the most physically gifted, that nasty streak of his is something we really need.
by burmafrd1944 on Feb 7, 2008 6:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
James Marten
Who the hell wanted this guy? The draft gurus hated him and saw little upside, yet we get the clown in the 3rd round? The same gurus loved Free and look at what happened?
How do you draft a guy in the 3rd round with no upside???
by jmangell0830 on Feb 8, 2008 3:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















