Second Round Mock Draft and other Cowboy tidbits
I haven’t seen many Second-Round Mock Drafts but Scout.com has one up. Very interesting stuff. Chris Steuber, a draft analyst, has us taking Arkansas RB Felix Jones (first time I’ve seen that) and Virginia Tech WR Eddie Royal. Steuber has this to say about Royal:
The Cowboys have done well in this draft and look to upgrade their offense even further in this round. They got Felix Jones ... and now get the speedy Eddie Royal as their slot receiver and return specialist.
Felix Jones in the second round? Don’t know about that one. Apparently these projections are based on a trade in the first round with Atlanta and the gamble is that Felix Jones will still be available midway through the second round. Don’t know if I agree with that. Jones certainly hasn’t done anything to suggest he's slipped that far. I haven’t heard of Jones’ posting bad 40 times, having low Wonderlic scores or anything of the sort. I may be wrong, but I just don’t see a talent like Jones slipping that far into the second round.
The book on Royal is that he’s fast (he ran a 4.39 in the 40) and he’s strong (he benches over 400 pounds) but he’s small at 5’10" and 184 pounds and the inconsistent quarterback play at Virginia Tech didn’t allow him to show his abilities adequately. He’s a good punt returner and kickoff returner.
Sweet. We need both of those.

So is our boy already married to Jessica? That’s what her mama says. But she could just be pulling the media’s chain. Could they even pull that off? I doubt it. They couldn’t even go to Mexico without the paparazzi following. If they got married somebody would know. They might even interrupt March Madness for exclusive coverage of the reception.
Like I said before in a previous post, she’s kinda part of the family so I gotta defend her. If and when it does happen tell me where to send the wedding gift. I’ll spring for some silverware, a crock pot or something.
The larger point here isn't the secret marriage -- real or imagined -- it's the fact that MSNBC reported this story along with People and Us magazines. Almost anybody could see the wink-and-nudge being played on the media here. No serious person believes they secretly got married. But Tony Romo is big business ladies and gentlemen. He's big news and Romo and Jessica together are starting to rival TomKat and Brangelina.

There’s a new installation in Ray Buck’s Old Boys Club series. Calvin Hill, a longtime consultant, discusses sports and his connections throughout the years. Here's an interesting fact: he hired Theo Epstein, current Red Sox GM, as a public relations assistant when he worked for the Baltimore Orioles. Wow. That’s impressive. He’ll need every one of these prior connections to keep Pacman Jones in line.
Hill also talks about some Cowboy history. He talks about being the first Cowboy to rush for 1,000 yards, playing injured in the Super Bowl and having to play second-fiddle to Duane Thomas during their Super Bowl run.
Hill takes us back to a November game in 1969, a high-scoring victory against the Redskins.
With five games to go, Hill needed to average only 40 yards to become the NFL’s first rookie 1,000-yard rusher. Instead, he ended up with 942.
And Gayle Sayers — with 1,032 — was the NFL’s lone 1,000-yard rusher that season. Oct. 25, 1970 (Cowboys 27, Chiefs 16) — Hill went to KC in a three-way battle (with MacArthur Lane of the Cardinals and Larry Brown of the Redskins) for the NFL rushing lead.
"Second play of the game, I did a cross-over block on [Chiefs linebacker] Willie Lanier, and he kneed me in the back," Hill said. "I couldn’t play after that."
This injury opened the door for Cowboys rookie Duane Thomas, a first-round draft pick from West Texas.
Landry to Hill: "Sit out a couple weeks, then come back."
"So, I sat out two weeks," recalled Hill. "Duane had two 100-yard games ... and when I came back, I didn’t play much."

The NFL is considering a restriction on hair length. I thought some of the celebration and taunting rules were dumb but apparently that wasn’t enough for the NFL. Now they are trying to up that absurdity with hair rules.
The DMN Blog points out The Barbarian, Captain Caveman and Isaiah Stanback all have long hair and might be affected. I can’t see MB3 without his dreads or Bobby Carpenter without his long mane. I agree with ESPN’s LZ Granderson who says this is more of a generational issue than anything. I thought everyone had a constitutionally-protected right to have a mullet. On that note, Patrick Kerney is thanking his lucky stars this rule wasn’t considered in 2001.
Come on, No Fun League. Can we concentrate on something that matters? Instead of end-zone dances and hair? Does the NFL really want to seem like the crazy preacher in "Footloose"? It’s not like we have all these long-haired hippies in the league who’d rather sing "Aquarius" than play football. For every Troy Polamula there’s a Patrick Crayton or Anthony Henry. Long hair is not the norm. This is a non-issue. Can we move on please?
That being said, these guys get paid a lot of money. And it’s not a right to play in the NFL but a privilege. So if they say snip it, I’d do it in a heartbeat. I can’t wear my Marion Barber jersey to work, so I can see how people could make a parallel.
Still sucks though.

I promised that I’d highlight some of the comments made from this blog. We’ll here it is. The first semi-regular Hat Tip Awards. Here we go!
Most Effective Running Gag:
Nelson for his response to Grizz’s post about Adam Schefter’s report that the Pacman trade is imminent and his post about not trading for Darren McFadden.
Nelson unveiled what has become his signature: a hilarious clip of some random guy dressed like a giant Pacman running through an office. The graphic speaks for itself. No matter how many times I see it, it never gets old.
Feel free to nominate others for these completely arbitrarily and random awards.
0 recs |
29 comments
Comments
As da President of the Long Hair Society...
...Virginia Beach Virginia Chapter, I hope the NFLPA forges a solid, unified front and this stoooopid long-hair ban does not go through.
Already NFLPA President Kevin Mawae, Kyle Turley, Mike Golic, and Mark Schlereth have voiced their respective opinions -- with all of them unanimously stating that this rule crosses the line.
Of course, having sported da long locks since '93, I'm sort of biased.
I support your stance, TH... and I agree with Jerry Glanville when he called the NFL the "No Fun League."
by kcbrett5 on Mar 29, 2008 4:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No Fun League
Reminds me of when T.O. got fined for waving his Touchdown Towel ON THE SIDELINE. It's almost like the NFL Brass feels restless and fidgety if they aren't enforcing anything.
And besides, what would guys lime MB3 and Troy Polamulu be without their hair? I've got dreadlocks that go halfway down my back, and personally, I feel like it's more than a hairstyle, it's who I am. I'm sure those guys and others feel the same way.
by Nelson on Mar 29, 2008 4:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't believe Jerry
He's not going to tip his hand before the draft.
I heard yesterday on TV or Radio that the Jessica/Romo marriage was a false rumor.
by Cowboys81 on Mar 29, 2008 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree totally.
The players union has to take a stand here. Roger Goodell believes that minority athletes should be nameless and faceless. This guy is an egomaniac and someone has to show him that he cant just make up rules, like his vague everchanging conduct policy.
When you talk about cutting hair you are messing with people's culture. And I'm not just talking about black players, Im talking about the Hawaiians, Samoans, Polynesians, or even a white guy that is straight up country and wants to rock a mullet.
As long as they follow the rules let these guys have a personality. Are they gonna make em cover their tattoos next?
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Mar 29, 2008 7:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Goodell has nothing to do with rule proposals
the teams and owners actually make they're own rules regarding the league, not Goodell.
by Terry on Mar 30, 2008 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hah
If only we had the clip of Aquarius as done in the credits of 40 year old Virgin. Possibly the only time I enjoyed movie credits in my life.
by BudLight on Mar 29, 2008 8:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That end-of-movie segment was hilarious, Bud!!!
by kcbrett5 on Mar 30, 2008 1:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
long hair
The NFL has to cut the hair, because if Roy Williams makes a tackle from behind by the hair it is legal and they cannot suspend him. If he does it by the shoulder pads, it will cost him at least 3 games this year.
by dirtycallahan on Mar 29, 2008 8:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Pretty Good Read
On Dallasnews.com there is a pretty good article on the marketing side of the cowboys. It is mostly about the future naming rights for the new stadium and possible suitors and what it would take.
"Jerry Jones is the best pure marketer in U.S. sports," Mr. Ganis said. "He has been able to generate more attention and more revenue for his brand than any other team in sports. In this area, he has no peer."
by Romo9 on Mar 29, 2008 9:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
$20 mil per year
Kinda narrows the field of companies down.
I'd guess ExxonMobil or Verizon are the two top probably willing to do that.
So much for Landry's Seafood...
by APerfectStar on Mar 30, 2008 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt Tony and Jessica tied the knot
There is no way that Pa Simpson would have let slip an opportunity to whore out his daughter to People, Us, Entertainment Weekly, etc.
There is something creepy about that guy.
by Seanrude on Mar 29, 2008 9:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah
There is no way that Pa Simpson would have let slip an opportunity to whore out his daughter to People, Us, Entertainment Weekly, etc.
Wouldn't surprise me if Joe tried to go the J.Lo-route and sell the exclusive rights of first pictures to People or some other mag for a few mil.
by Nelson on Mar 29, 2008 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont understand.
Why do people have a problem with the hair length thing. I mean come on its a job. They are paid to do that job. If their employeer doesnt want their hair a certain length then so be it. Can you guys wear whatever you want at your job? Maybe you maybe you cant. I dont see a players hair part of their personality but the way they play on the field. If a player is only noticed by their hair then maybe they should focus on being a better player. No one has a problem knowing where Witten is on the field.
All im saying is if the only reason a player wants to keep his long hair is because no one will recgonize them without it maybe they got a little more to worry about.
/end rant
by thebigham on Mar 30, 2008 5:58 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
True but....
I cant wear anything I want to work. But I can certainly wear my hair anyway I like. Companies get sued for telling people otherwise. The uniform regulations are enough.
And Im telling you right now. I have a pretty good paying job and if they told me to shave my face I would quit without a second thought. Some things are bigger than money and players should not let anyone take their individuality from them.
I really wouldnt be mad if there was a work stoppage over this deal. But there arent enough NFL players with enough character to take it that far.
They are gutless like the NBA players who let that culturally biased off court dress code fly.
Somebody step up.
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Mar 30, 2008 7:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In most part, I agree with Ham.....
Is it really asking that much as to cut it to shoulder length so your name logo can be seem, and recognized. At the very least, If it can easily be folded, and tied up to expose the name...
Personally, I feel all the players(about 10 tops) that do wear it halfway to their ass are strickly doing so to be indivisualist, and scoff at the team unit concept.It's kinda like the rule of players not being allowed to take their helmuts off while on the field of play...It doesn't have anything to do with a cultural bias...
I have no problem with the NFL's stance on this...but I doubt it will pass..
It's only going take take one time when someone grabs MBIII from behind, by his locks and he breaks his neck, that people will understand it's not really a big deal to alter their arrogant, indivisual expressive style..
They have hair nets for guys like that..
by BoyzRback07 on Mar 30, 2008 8:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Im not coming off of this one.
Why is it such a bad thing to express yourself? I dont think that anyone is scoffing at the team concept. Do you think any one of Troy Polamalu or Marion Barber's teammates or coaches would say he is not a team player because of his hair.
You can express yourself with your look and be a team player with your play and attitude.
WE ARE PLAYIN WITH PEOPLES CULTURE.
And personally I dont want to see a bunch of look-alike drones running around on Sunday.
They have not once said it is a safety issue. If they were concerned with safety they would have never made it legal to tackle by the hair.
This is the egomaniac, racist commissioner trying to control every little aspect of the game. I hope the players strike. They have got to get this clown off his high horse.
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Mar 30, 2008 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
WHOA
look a like drones? That vast majority of players have short hair as it is. I dont understand your statement.
And what does race have to do with anything.
From what i hear is that the rule the Nfl wants to pass is your hair cant cover the top of the players name. So players can still do their own thing just not to an extreme which i think is a fair trade.
by thebigham on Mar 30, 2008 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Race has everything to do with this.
Come on, who is this rule directed at, really? Not the squeaky clean do-boys like Peyton Manning. I think the NFL is queasy about being represented by dredlocks, gold teeth and tattoos.
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Mar 30, 2008 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just show the players this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDy66...
by APerfectStar on Mar 30, 2008 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Although there are some white guys with long hair, this is directed at the dread brigade
by Seanrude on Mar 30, 2008 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is ridiculous.
So only "colored" [sorry couldnt think of a politcally correct term] people can have dredlocks, gold teeth and tattoos. And only "white" people can be squeaky clean. I hate when things turn to this. Race has nothing to do with it end of story.
by thebigham on Mar 30, 2008 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Got me wrong.
There are plenty of squeaky clean guys of all colors. There are plenty of bad guys of all colors. But the common opinion (and misconception) is that only the bad guys have dreads tatoos and gold teeth.
Thats why they are cracking down and its unfair to all the Edgerrin James' and Mike McKenzie's of the world. If Kevin Greene was still around I would say this is unfair to him as well.
But we know who the target is. And this is absolutely a race thing.
The NFL is terrified of Hip-Hop culture, and wants to separate itself from it. This is a pointless fight because a good percentage of NFL players come from the same places that Hip Hop artists do. They cant throw a blanket on this one.
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Mar 30, 2008 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1 ham.....
This rule only effects about a dozen players.....Nobody is saying get a military cut......just cut it to where you can see your jersey name and number......or tie it up...it's not hard....it's not racist, and it sure isn't unpractical.....what's the problem...they aren't saying cut it...they are saying get it off your name and number...simple...even Pacman got rid of his locks....i'm sure they didn't tell him to.
It'a all about dress code.....MLB has the same rules as far as wearing socks a certain way, tucking in uniforms...NBA , same thing...jersey's tucked in, etc...look professional man....cutting 4-6" off your dreads ain't a big deal....
A NFL ref shouldn't have to pull up your hair to get a look at the name or number to see who caused the infraction.
by BoyzRback07 on Mar 30, 2008 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Racist?
There are members of all races in the NFL that have long hair, not just African-americans. The NFL wants to be presented as a presentable american sport and with all the frequent legal infractions it is understandable that they want to make their image better in anyway possible. It isn't a restriction on dreads either, it is a restriction on hair length. They aren't targeting the black athletes in the NFL, the majority of the league is black, they are merely trying to fix their image. If you are a NFL player, you are making good money. Even minimum salary in the NFL is pretty good, these players shouldn't be complaining about hair length. You aren't being foced to cut your hair, if thats all you care about just leave the league behing and get a new job. Thats what the NFL is, A JOB, and most jobs want their employees to look presentable.
by Romo9 on Mar 30, 2008 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed with BoyzRback
Juicy discussion, sorry I missed this one.
The thing about this rule that rubs me the wrong way is the WHY?? I don't think it's a safety thing because they haven't said that it is, and if so, it's something the player has complete control over. They know they can be tackled by the hair. It's a classic "No Fun League" random rule. It's not for player identification purposes either; come on, the guys with the crazy hair are the most recognizable guys on the field because they have crazy hair.
I don't really buy the racial argument here; I think that was definitely going on with the NBA dress code, but here they're not even saying that players need to cut their hair, they just need to tuck it into their helmets. There is definitely a cultural element involved for players that wear it that way (anyone seen Hawaii's college football team?), but I don't think the NFL's philosophy is because of any factor like that.
Maybe it's to try to crack down on players trying to be more recognizable for marketing purposes, and clearly guys with long hair are more visible because of it. Polamalu is a great player, but the hair is his trademark. But I would think the NFL likes having recognizable stars.
For me, it comes down to the idea that you should have a reason to change a rule and change how people behave. I see no reason here, so I say no change.
by grapejoos on Mar 31, 2008 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
One more thing.
Is it true that Herm Edwards came up with this rule? If so I have lost all respect for him. And I had a lot.
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Mar 30, 2008 7:37 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i think...
they fact that Edwards supports the rule shows this is a generational issue moreso than anything else. just an example. i swear my father was more upset at latrell sprewell for having braids than choking his coach. the braids just drove him up the wall.
by Tuna Helper on Mar 30, 2008 10:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















