Jacques Reeves underrated?
KC Joyner has an interesting article over at ESPN. He lists Jacques Reeves as one of free agency's underrated players, citing Reeves' YPA numbers throughout the season.
Jacques Reeves, CB, Texans: Reeves, formerly of the Cowboys, had a 7.9 YPA in 2007. That number alone says he is average, but it is skewed somewhat by three of his games. Reeves struggled in Week 2 at Miami, got beat for a 69-yard touchdown by Donte' Stallworth in Week 6 against New England and had a subpar showing in Week 11 against Washington.
Take those three tilts out of his numbers, and Reeves' YPA drops to 7.0, which is a starting-cornerback level YPA. He might not be a shutdown cornerback, but he certainly is an upgrade for a weak Houston secondary that can use all the help it can get.
This is a perfect example of someone twisting stats to reflect their own agenda. True, Reeves' numbers can be skewed by big plays that he gave up throughout the season but the fact remains he still gave those up. If you were a Cowboys fan watching the whole year then you saw that while Reeves played well at the beginning, he was targeted over and over again successfully by opposing offenses as the season wore on. When the Cowboys were desperate for a stop, Reeves was always guilty of giving up the third down conversion. It was frustrating to watch him line up 10 yards off the ball on a third and six and give up the easy come back or slant pass. And the 46 second touchdown drive by New York in the playoff game was a perfect example of Reeves' shortcomings as a corner and how an offense can exploit him. While there are worse cornerbacks playing in the NFL and teams are always in need of a decent defensive back, just because Houston gave Reeves a $20 million contract does not mean he was underrated as a Cowboy.
However, Joyner also lists D.J. Hackett as another underrated player who could make an impact in 2008. The Cowboys have sat back and played it safe so far in free agency and will wait to see who will fall through the cracks just itching to be snatched up for a cheap contract. Hackett could very well be that guy. The closer we get to the draft and the more I think about Jerry Jones' attitude about our current wide receivers I just don't see the Cowboys drafting a receiver on the first day. If the Cowboys can sign a player like Hackett then they can focus even more on positions in need of depth.
A lot of fans are praying for the Cowboys to make a play for Larry Fitzgerald or Detroit's Roy Williams but neither of those players has a shot of coming to Dallas any time soon. For one, Detroit is adamant that they are not trading Williams, and Larry Fitzgerald is just too expensive for the Cowboys to trade for. The Cowboys have also not shown any interest in Bryant Johnson, another speedy receiver on the market. Hackett would bring speed to the team and could come at an affordable price perfect for the Cowboys.
0 recs |
17 comments
Comments
Reeves underrated???
LMAO
All I can say is Houston doesn't exactly have a great history of picking players. A little bit of history repeating....
by APerfectStar on Mar 8, 2008 7:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
i think
it was a typo and they really meant UNRATED
by TrueBlue24 on Mar 9, 2008 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ROTFLMAO!!!
That's frickin' hilarious, True!!!!!!!
by kcbrett5 on Mar 10, 2008 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree Brandon
all this trading for or signing a big name WR talk is just utter nonsense.
by Terry on Mar 8, 2008 7:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
yeah
It was frustrating to watch him line up 10 yards off the ball on a third and six and give up the easy come back or slant pass.
You can say that again.
Announcer: FIRST DOWN!
Us: UGH!
by Nelson on Mar 8, 2008 8:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Same here
He absolutely made me crazy during the season.
There was a reason they had him play 40 yards off the WR, and why the team didn't pursue a re-signing.
by dunkman on Mar 9, 2008 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And what was so frustrating was...
... that Reeves had track star speed, but didn't know how to use it in coverage and didn't have the confidence to implement it the right way.
In a sense, that's also on Brian Stewart and Todd Bowles, too... because Stew and Bowles were both supposed to have experience coaching DBs.
So glad da King had the smarts to (a) not keep Reeves, (b) not spend stupid money on him.
by kcbrett5 on Mar 10, 2008 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I say use both 1st rounders on CB, then we might
get 1 starter if we're lucky, RB in the secound and sure pick up some small collage speed at WR in the 3rd or...Hey, how about a back up QB who might actualy be able to play for a while in a pinch if Superman gets hurt.
No matter what we do...Reeves still sucks!
by Badknees on Mar 8, 2008 9:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm surprised he didn't make the Pro Bowl
by Jaxon on Mar 9, 2008 9:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jaxon... bitter bitter bitter
Is that burr still under your saddle?
I think the Cowboys were a little over represented, but what are they supposed to do? Turn down the trip?
by dunkman on Mar 9, 2008 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He you just calm down there!
We practically gave you Matt Moore. You're welcome.
by sublimezg on Mar 9, 2008 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats a hell of an Idea! Finally someone who ...
knows there Football LOL
by Badknees on Mar 9, 2008 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
idiocy
first, football stat, while not completely irrelevant, are pretty meaningless. the sampling sizes are just too small.
second, its this sort of horse-sh!t statistical analysis that drives me crazy...
yes by taking out his 3 worst games (which btw is over 18%) then his averages improve. without his ad games he may be better than average. that is because the average player has bad games. if you take out al the cb's worst 3 games then while reeves numbers go from average to above average, guess what so do everyone elses.
if you take out romo's worst 3 games, his averages go up. take out folk's worst 3 games and he didnt miss a kick. take out newmans worse 34 games.. and he didnt miss a game all year. take out alber pujhols worst 30 games and he may hit 400 every year.
people aho dont understand stats should use them.
by 325424 on Mar 9, 2008 4:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think we need to factor in the rule change
effectively limiting defensive backs to poster dummies. There are a few CBs who are still formidable but most are vulnerable. With the disparity in skill between Newman and Henry vs Reeves and Jones naturally the latter two got picked on. Since we did not spend $80 million last year we were left with two former 7th rounders to cover injuries. What the Giants showed the NFL last year is the answer is multiple good pass rushers - a factor already being implemented here with Spencer. If another pass rusher is available in this draft I would not be surprised to see us nab him. Houston, however, is a step down for Reeves and his exposure might be even more evident without as many pass rushers. Chances are Houston also is looking for another pass rusher in the draft and hope to avoid the weakness in their new cornerback.
by lee3022 on Mar 10, 2008 3:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Glad to see you posting more again, Lee...
Outstanding points, sir.
Hopefully, the viewers will see frequent highlights of Reeves getting toasted to reveal how little BSPN writers know about our situation at corner.
by kcbrett5 on Mar 10, 2008 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No doubt
it's always good when lee is posting again!
by Dave Halprin on Mar 10, 2008 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















