Ken Hamlin, Dallas Cowboys could be near long-term deal
This is good news. It appears the Dallas Cowboys and Ken Hamlin are about to get a long-term deal done.
Hamlin's agent, Kennard McGuire, met with Cowboys officials Tuesday during the lunch break at the NFL owners meetings. A long-term deal could be nearing completion.
McGuire said Tuesday that both sides are seeking the same thing -- to keep Hamlin in Dallas for the long term.
"It's mutual," McGuire said. "We both want to make sure we give him the security that he not only deserves, but that the Cowboys get the player that helps them stabilize what they're doing."
Get ‘er done, Jerry.

The Cowboys and Titans are stalled on the Pacman trade. The Titans want a 4th this year and a 6th that could be a 5th based on performance in 2009. The Cowboys are only willing to give one pick in this year’ draft. You know the talks have stalled because Titan’s coach Jeff Fisher is coming out with all kinds of praise for Pacman, hoping to stoke the interest of others or give the impression that the Cowboys are trying to low-ball the Titans.
"I've enjoyed him," Fisher said at the AFC coaches' breakfast. "Pac is a good teammate, when he was available, [and] a very good practice player and fun to be around. These issues, involving his personal decisions, are separate."
"He's one of the more instinctive defensive corners I've ever been around," said Fisher, who has coached defensive football in the NFL for 23 seasons. "Unlike anyone I've ever had before, he's a guy who guesses right. I don't recall him guessing wrong."
Fisher saw Jones evolve into an elite cornerback at Tennessee.
"I thought Pac matured considerably," he said. "By the end of his second year, he understood the emotions associated with the game and how to control those emotions on the field."

This is a very weird report, if it was printed yesterday I would have thought it was an April Fool’s joke, but apparently it’s true. At least it’s true in the sense that the Cleveland Browns thought it was true. The reason the Browns upped their offer to QB Derek Anderson right after free-agency had begun was because they thought they were about to lose him to the Cowboys, who would then ship him to the Dolphins.
Anderson, a restricted free agent, would sign a deal with the Dallas Cowboys that the Browns could not match. The Browns would receive the Cowboys' first- and third-round draft picks, which would have given the Browns the 28th selection in the first round.
The Cowboys then would trade Anderson, and perhaps a future draft pick, to the Miami Dolphins for the first overall pick in this year's draft. The Cowboys would select Arkansas running back Darren McFadden.
No joke, Browns GM Phil Savage admits as much in the article. And the evidence they had for thinking that was minimal. It makes you wonder what goes on in NFL front offices sometimes. There’s another version of the story here, which also includes this nugget.
Here come the Cowboys:
A league source said one draft of the upcoming 2008 schedule calls for the Browns to open the season Sept. 7 at home against the Dallas Cowboys. The game would be moved to 4 p.m. and aired on Fox as its national game.
0 recs |
19 comments
Comments
Fisher is so full of s#%&
If Pacman matured so much and was such a great player, the Titans certainly wouldn't be giving up on him as Fisher said earlier.
Talk about talking out of both sides of your mouth. I'm glad Jerry is sticking to his guns on this jerk, hopefully the trade never happens at all, that would be awesome.
Now that Hamlin's deal is pretty much done, that only leaves MB3, Ware and Newman as the next studs to take care of.
by Terry on Apr 2, 2008 9:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey Terry I told you Hamlin would be the
first to be given a long term extension. This is great news. He was top priority to get resigned, even more so than MB3 IMO.
by Cowboys81 on Apr 2, 2008 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Give them the 4th, nothing else
I want this deal done. They'll take it with just a 4th this year. Make the deal, then turn around and deal Ayodele and a late-round pick to a team that needs LB help to move back to the end of the 4th round (in one way or another).
Great news on Hamlin, though. I was resigned to losing him. I don't know how they're making this work cap-wise, but I trust the guys that write the checks.
by grapejoos on Apr 2, 2008 9:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
What are you thinking!!!!
why would you give up a valuable fourth round pick for a player that's sstill suspended and the titans have NO leverage since NO other team has showed any interest, so what's the big deal to get it done aleady. There is no rush...
Jerry should just offer a sixth this year or a conditional fifth based next year on playing time and performance this year, NO WAY would I give up a fourth round pick for a player the titans want to get rid of anyway.
There was no doubt in my mind that Hamlin would be the quarterback this secondary needed when we signed him last year and would be locked up long term after the season he had.
by Deke on Apr 2, 2008 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree 100% Deke, and BTW
is this a record for us agreeing so much, just wondering?
by Terry on Apr 2, 2008 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've been noticing the same thing lately.
What's up with that?!?!
I feel like I'm in some kind of Bizarro world.
by kcbrett5 on Apr 2, 2008 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am thinking that we're not getting him
I believe there are other teams involved here, and if there aren't now, there certainly will be when he gets reinstated. I also think the Titans may just do an about-face and decide to keep him. Happens all the time. That's all speculation, but I think they can hold firm on demanding a 4th round pick and some team (that's not us) will pay up. If I thought no other teams would jump in and that Tennessee would never decide to keep him, then I would agree with you.
I also clearly value a pick at the end of the 4th round a lot less than some people relative to a pro-bowl caliber CB and all-pro return guy. I don't think a 4th round pick is that big an asset to this team right now, and even if it would yield a useful bench player, I think we can easily get another 4th rounder by trading a guy we're going to cut anyway and an even lower pick. I'm usually a pro-draft pick kind of guy, but I know a bargain when I see it. I think a much fairer way to do this is to make it a 2009 pick contingent on what happens this season, but if the ultimate choice is a 4th rounder or Pacman, then I'm going with Pacman.
by grapejoos on Apr 2, 2008 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jerry's business mind
seems to always be fully engaged. Gotta love that about him.
by sublimezg on Apr 2, 2008 9:50 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Crazy stuff
That Cleveland story is hard to believe.
by BudLight on Apr 2, 2008 10:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
that just proves how big of an idiot Savage is
by Terry on Apr 2, 2008 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There were other options:
http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/...
by BoyzRback07 on Apr 3, 2008 9:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Silly Season 2008.
Not even the GMs are immune.
by Nelson on Apr 2, 2008 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know what...
At first I was like wow.. Pacman could really be just what we need on this team. But if I was Jerry at this point I'd say "here's my offer, you can take it or leave it" and I wouldn't budge an inch because quite honestly, we don't need him. We have 2 first round picks and WILL be getting a corner in the draft regardless. Pacman would serve as good depth and that's all. Would he help our team if he's reinstated? absolutely. Do we need him? Absolutely not. Jerry, make your offer and walk away. If they're interested they'll come to you.
Sorry if I've reiterated here. I've not read the above posts yet. I'm getting pretty tired of reading the same crap over and over regarding Pacman. Bleh..
by sublimezg on Apr 2, 2008 10:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree, the Cowboys certainly don't need more
talent to win the SB, the Giants proved that as we have by far and away a much a more talented team.
The Cowboys need to learn how to handle success and grow mentally and emotionally to learn how to play their best at the end of the season instead of at the beginning or the middle.
by Terry on Apr 2, 2008 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hamlin needs to stay a Cowboy.
Ken provides leadership from either safety position, which solidifies the future. If Roy bombs again this year, then at least Dallas has Hamlin to fall back on at SS. I feel that with Watkins and the possibility of Henry moving over, there are more options at FS (especially if they draft one high).
I was trying to think of how Dallas can get more room under the cap and resigning Hamlin is one of those ways. Doing the same with Barber may also help to spread the hit over a few years.
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 2, 2008 11:18 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I didn't see where it said we were near a long
term deal with Hamlin. All it said is they both want Hamlin to remain a Cowboy.
by quincyyyyy on Apr 2, 2008 12:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Great news!
If there's a player we definitely DON'T need to lose, it's Hamlin.
by Nelson on Apr 2, 2008 12:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
But can we afford to match the contract crazy Al gave Gibril Wilson? That's pretty exorbitant.
by BudLight on Apr 2, 2008 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















