Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Dallas Cowboys 2008 NFL draft grades rolling in

 

The draft grades are starting to roll in and the Dallas Cowboys are generally getting good reviews. Almost all analysts are giving the Cowboys A’s or B’s for their efforts over the weekend.

Here are the grades and click on the names to read why they gave us the grades they did. Enjoy!

Mel Kiper – B+ 

Pete Prisco – A 

Rick Gosselin – B 

The Star Ledger – B- 

John Czarnecki – A- 

Charean Williams - B+ 

Football’s Future - A 

Sporting News - B+ 

For my own personal grade, I'd give it a B. I like Felix Jones and think he'll add instant speed to the offense and will upgrade our special teams. Mike Jenkins was great value at #25 and is insurance for Pacman and a step towards building a younger secondary for the future. I'm not thrilled with Martellus Bennett in the second round, he's a great athlete but not enough production for me and thought we could fill the spot of a second TE later. Tashard Choice is a solid pick with good value at that spot although I'm not sure Dallas needed to go for a 2nd RB at that spot. Orlando Scandrick adds another piece to an upgraded secondary and flashes excellent speed. Erik Walden felt like a reach in the 6th round and will be a project, maybe not the best use of that pick.

Add your grades below.

0 recs | Comment 55 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

B-

Would rather have selected Mendenhall, but Jones is a fine back who will complement MB3 very well. I also understand the Choice selection because Jones wouldn’t be able to carry the entire load in case MB3 is injured or doesn’t get signed long term.

I love the talent Jenkins brings to the table, but am concerned about his character and work ethic, thats why I prefered Cason to offset Pacman’s thug mentality influence on our younger players. Hopefully he won’t be reinstated and we’ll have 3 4th rd picks next season.

I really liked the Bennett pick because he’ll provide Romo with another big target in addition to Witten down the seam.

Thought Jerry did a brilliant job of trading for future picks in 2009.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 28, 2008 10:29 AM CDT   0 recs

Oh yeah

I almost forgot about those picks acquired for next year. Detroit’s 3rd and Cleveland’s 4th will really help manuever the board next year.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 10:51 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

B-

This would have been a A- or B+ if the pick was Mendenhall at #22. I just can’t see passing on a three down back for a guy like Jones. Yeah, I like the speed dimension but potential franchise backs don’t fall in your lap every year.

Like the Jenkins pick, though I would have been satisifed with a trade down a pick of Flowers a few spots lower. Still, Jenkins is a good fit and fills a definite need.

Bennett: like the player, not sure if I like him there. Would have preferred a WR or, to a lesser extent, FS in that spot.

LOVE the pick of Choice. Strong runner, he will provide solid depth. Great value pick at that spot.

Don’t know much about the other two picks. I would have rather seen us take a shot at a position of need then on another OLB.

Thought Jerry got a bit too cute with the trades on the second day. Hopefully he got some 2009 value with those 3rd and 4th rounders he picked up.

B-. Give me a Mendenhall and I like the draft alot more. Hopefully Jones pans out.

by MPC4LIFE on Apr 28, 2008 10:36 AM CDT   0 recs

B is a cool grade...

i would’ve taken mendenhall is well. i’m not that concerned about the walden pick. remember jason hatcher was a project too. i am concerned billy p isn’t here to build up that project. he seems good at that. columbo, hatcher, reeves. hopefully wade p will coach ‘em up…..

i like the walden pick better than the taster’s choice pick. just MHO.

by Tuna Helper on Apr 28, 2008 10:38 AM CDT   0 recs

C+ grade from me

Taking a complementory back in Jones over an every down back that falls right into your lap in mendenhall at 22, was a complete mistake. Even Jerry doesn’t think Jones is an every down back. Jerry’s reasoning is void of all logic, he stated that Mendenhall every down ability took away from selecting him at 22, what!!!! That’s thee dumbest double talk logic yet i’ve heard from jerry for not selecting a player. The fact is Jerry was fixated o Jones from the get go and no one in that draft room was going to change Jerry’s mind. I’m sure Mendenhall was rated higher on the cowboys board than Jones.

Jenkins is an absolute great pick, He was the second best corner for me in this draft and I thought he would was long gone by 22, it was smart for Jerry to move up insure getting him.

Bennett pick is another pick void of logic. This is a position where you already have an all pro tightend in Witten. Bennett is a project, you dont draft projects in the second round, you draft players that have a good chance of starting this year, Bennett doesn’t fit that role. He’d be lucky to be activated on game day, Curtis is entrenched as the second tightend, he has really stepped up his game alst year. Bennett needs work in blocking, that he’s not going to master in year one.

Taschard Choice pick just proves what I’ve stated about the Jones pick in round one, Jones is a complementory back, so Dallas had to protect themselves in case Barber got injured and could miss an extended period of time, Choice is a good player and could start and carry the load, Jones clearly cannot because of this pick.

Scandrick is a great pick and could be a steal in the draft. He was a great value for where he was picked, some boards had him late second or an early third round pick, to get him in the fifth, it was a great move to solidify our secondary, an area that I mentioned many tiimes last year that Reeves and Jones were nothing more than spares on this roster. Our secondary has improved greatly from this draft, regardless of Pac-rat..

Walden was a reach pick, a player you probably could of signed as an UFA after the draft. This is an area where a fullback or nose tackle should of been addressed in this draft,. With Anderson the only fulback and Tank as the only true nose tackle on the roster.

Jerry was up to his old days, moving down and around and added very good draft picks for next year, as for this years draft, I give the cowboys a C+, but if you take into account the picks added for next years draft, I’d give Dallas a B-. It would of been a A- if mendenhall was taken over Jones, then we wouldn’t of needed a second running back where Choice was selected and Bennett was selected to high for what is really a project that wont contribute alot this year.

by Deke on Apr 28, 2008 10:42 AM CDT   0 recs

They need 3 backs!

Think about how great it would be to have the running game take over and win a few games next year instead of relying on the passing game. Gotta have 3 good backs if you are splitting carries.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 10:53 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I never said they didn't

If they took mendenhall, a lead type back, then you wouldn’t need to take Choice in the fourth round, but draft one later. But as I stated many times before, dallas should of signed Tatum Bell in free agency, then you woulldn’t need to draft another back after you selected mendenhall, you would be set at that position, and if Barber continues to want 40-60 milion, I’d say bye bye after this yera, then you’d have Mendenhall as your lead back, Bell as you change of pace back, and draft a rookie later in the draft next year. Barber isn’t a lead back, never has and never will be, his best role was as the second change of pace back where his carries are limited to keep him fresh.

by Deke on Apr 28, 2008 11:02 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Barber is a football player. Tatum Bell is not.

Gotta go with what works—MBIII is solid. Because of this draft and his contract situation everybody is looking too far ahead. He’s still young; he’s still got a future here. Has he ever even had a sprained ankle? Tatem Bell couldn’t even play an entire year yet.

Mendenhall could become the new Steeler bruiser back—I admit, I like how he keeps his legs moving like Roger Craig. But Felix Jones will be waaaaaaay better as a speed back than Bell, and Tashard Choice is solid and a great team leader.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 11:08 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

First off

I never seen one word in your response about barber being a lead back, Please, dont tell me Jones is faster than Bell, he is not… Tatum bell could actually start a game if needed because of injury, and has in Denver, Bell isn’t an every down back but I’m not looking for him to be that type of back, I could use him in alot of ways in this offense, toss sweeps, end around, lined up in the slot.. Mike Martz didn’t use him, he didn’t even use any of his backs, he’d rather throw the ball every down. Detroit deacticated him most of the games, thats why Mike martz is clueless as a coordiinator.

Jones hasn’t played even a down in the NFL and he’s waaaaay better, what crystal ball are you using. You dont take a change of pace back in the first round over a lead type back, if he’s available, that’s all I’m saying..

by Deke on Apr 28, 2008 11:19 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

There's upside with Felix

whereas there is a ceiling on Tatem. Felix is a rookie—he can end up being really, really good. That has to count for something, some hope for the future that Tatem can’t provide. Bringing in Bell can be done at any time via Free Agency or trade. Felix is a Dallas Cowboy and will be as long as he can be.

Why would Martz deactive Bell? He had speedy WR-like Marshall Faulk. You think he would’ve wanted to use Bell like he did Marshall. Guess he wasn’t that good. In fact, he will be out of the league within 5 years. Will Felix? Doubt it.

Yes, Felix is instantly better. Don’t know why you hate on him. I wanted Rashard too, but after getting Choice I feel alot better. We needed a KR too. If we can get 2-3 TDs on special teams this year, that would be 2-3 more TDs than we had last year.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 11:25 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I never said I dont like him

its not about the name on the back of the jersey with me, its about the team, period. I dont get caught up in the Names, its the type of player that is valued in the first round, a lead back is more of a value than a complementory player, a lead back is on the field 80% of the time, a complementory player is on the field 20% of the time, which one is a better value to a team, a player thats on the field 80% of the time or a player thats on the field 20% of the time, especially a first round player.

by Deke on Apr 28, 2008 11:38 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Oh, Barber can do it.

Everybody points out that Giants game, but the 2nd half was devoted to trying to get the passing game going. It was one game.

If Dallas really wanted Felix—and they did—then they had to have taken him there with that 1st pick. You saw the little run on RBs. Nobody expected Chris Johnson to go that high. Felix would’ve been gone.

This is a 2 back team. There’s no Emmitt, no Dorsett. Felix is a multi-purpose weapon that WILL be useful. He’s not just a backup.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 2:32 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Barber can do it!!!

you know this how, again are you using a crystal ball, He started one game, how does that translate that he can do it. I suggest you go watch the second half of the Giant Playoff game again, he was gassed in the second half, 11 carries, 28 yards, missed blitz pickups and you want to say that dallas passed all the tiime.

Dallas wanted Jones because that the back that they thought would be there. They didn’t think Mendenhall would, again they missed picking a lead back, just like they did when they passed on Steven Jackson, another blunder. I’m not saying Jones isn’t a good back, but again you dont draft multipurpose/USEFUL backs in the first round. Mendenhall was the better choice.

Everytime I hear we run the two back system, I’m reminded when a coach says that he has two good quarterbacks, which really means, they dont have one main franchise QB, same can be said for running backs.

by Deke on Apr 28, 2008 2:45 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

2 back systems

is becoming the trend (one that Parcells saw and accepted). Look what’s happening to Larry Johnson, Shaun Alexander, Frank Gore, etc. RBs take as many, if not more, hits than linebackers. Felix and MB3 have shared carries through college and will continue to in the pros. Do you have a crystal ball where you can see both these guys huffin’ and puffin’ just because they got 30 carries in a game? Julius Jones did 3 of those in a row his rookie season. He wasn’t gassed he was happy.

Again—the Giants game was one game. Get over it. Barber’s came in to spell Julius when he got knocked outta the game and was fine. These guys are athletes—they don’t get winded easily.

I don’t see how any Cowboy fan can’t be excited about this new backfield. Wait till they take the field and I guarantee you’ll be more excited this year to watch these three then Julius, Tyson Thompson ran with Barber.

Mendenhall could’ve been a franchise back, doesn’t mean he will be.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 3:01 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

rigga...some get it...some don't.......

I can assure all that Felix Jones will be on the field for much more than 20% of the offensive plays….Mendenhall wouldn’t have started here….he wouldn’t have seen 20% of the plays…he wouldn’t have helped on special teams….he wouldn’t have liked being a back up….and he wouldn’t have offered anything that MBIII or Choice couldn’t offer as well….so there…..end of subject….Felix Jones was the ONLY back that would fit into this scheme PERFECTLY…and i for one am soooo soooo glad it worked out this way….Felix Jones WILL be a star in this league….much more than Tatam Bell ever was, has, or will be…..period…..

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

"If you don’t take him off the field as a coach, he will just about die out there," Jerry Jones said. "That impacted my decision. It’s a Michael Irvin-type work ethic. That’s what we are talking about with Felix Jones."
- Owner/G.M of the Dallas Cowboys , Jerry Jones

by BoyzRback on May 1, 2008 6:41 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Exactly

After watching the Giants use multiple RB’s through the season it helps to have 3 good ones. I know some question whether we should’ve taken Choice, but when you only have 2 including Felix Jones we needed another capable player. This could be setting up for insurance in the event we can’t get MB3 resigned next season. I love the selections.

by Boyzfan94 on Apr 28, 2008 12:52 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

What potential starter was available in Round 2?

Many experts are agreeing with you that the Cowboys shouldn’t have been picking backups, but what position did you see them taking a starter at in this year’s draft? I don’t think there was a single player in the draft available at any position that would be starting this year over the guys we have, at least at the spots where we picked.

I see the potential of Jones and Choice as similar to J. Jones and Barber if Barber doesn’t get resigned. I think the Cowboys view Jones as 1A rather than 2, and will view Choice as 1A if Barber leaves next year.

by Baked Potato Soup on Apr 28, 2008 10:57 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

and Felix should give them

what Julius gave them in his rookie year.

I was wondering if Garrett would consider keeping Barber as the change of pace back and start Jones. Don’t think it will happen, but Barber will probably play most of the series in the 1st and 4th quarter while they mix Felix in the 2nd and 3rd where he could help put the game outta reach.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 11:00 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I just think that if there wasn't a player there in the second round

that could help you this year, then Dallas should of moved down, acquire more picks and probably still of gotten Bennett.

by Deke on Apr 28, 2008 11:24 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

thats funny you say that because

word has it that Jerry wanted to actually trade up in the 2nd rd to draft Bennett but Stephen told his dad to hold on and he’d be there at #61.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 28, 2008 12:44 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

A-

We had 3 actual needs, considering we sent an NFL record Pro-Bowlers and lost only 1 starter, Akin Ayodele, which were CB, RB, and WR.

RB – I think that Jones is a better fit for our existing offense, and also is a better good faith pick in regards to Barber’s contract negotiations. However, picking up Choice gives us another Barber type if the contract talks don’t work out. Great job. We definitely are solid at RB now.

CB – Jenkins and Scandrick would give us a great secondary without Pacman. With him, I think we have the best in the league.

WR – This was just not a good draft for receivers. I’m glad that we didn’t reach. The Redskins took Malcolm Kelly in Rd. 2, and the TE we took is just as fast, 2 inches taller, and 40 pounds heavier. I think he can be used as a Dallas Clark type that gives us a major mismatch against corners or linebackers, as well as making running out of the 3 WR set equally dangerous as passing.

I’m not the biggest fan of Patrick Crayton, but he played as well as any rookie WR last year, his first as a starter. I don’t see any of this year’s prospects giving us more production than he will likely provide this year.

A- if Pacman doesn’t get reinstated, A+ if he does.

by Baked Potato Soup on Apr 28, 2008 10:45 AM CDT   0 recs

And now we have awesome KR/PRs!!!

Whenever a NFC East team drafts a WR, it doesn’t scare me. They never seem to pan out unless they go to the Giants.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 10:55 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

A-

It makes more sense to me for Dallas to draft 2 RBs—one with speed, the other a true backup—especially because both of these backs were very productive and have real talent. Mendenhall would’ve been nice, but I think they would’ve had to trade up to get a speed back like J. Charles if they would’ve taken the Illini back.

The TE was not necessary, but if he gets some key 3rd down catches out of the backfield or in 2 TE sets he can contribute right away and perhaps become a better playmaker than Fasano. This pick did surprise me.

2 corners were a necessity and I’m glad they took them where they did.

Don’t know much about the pass rusher, but they do need to keep grooming that position considering Greg Ellis is getting up there.

Would’ve like to see a S (not great in this draft) or NT (disappointed they didn’t get Rubin) in this draft—maybe even a development interior OL (that guard from USC is a rookie free agent). But I’m really glad they ignored the WR group. They need to see this year what they have already unless they get a vet.

I think Dallas picked talented players that will all (except maybe the DE/OLB) make this team. They need contributors in certain positions (RB, CB) and they got that. They also shot some speed into this team.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 10:49 AM CDT   0 recs

Infatuation With Mendenhall???

Obviously time will tell, but his stats don’t impress me. He didn’t do anything against the tougher oppenents on Illinois schedule & he had (1) big run against USC. See for yourself.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=174861

by wleiseljr on Apr 28, 2008 10:54 AM CDT   0 recs

True that.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 10:57 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Agreed.

I’m extremely wary of spread offense backs.

by Baked Potato Soup on Apr 28, 2008 10:58 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

And even Felix

took most of his carries from the I-position—very prolike!

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 11:01 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Prolike!!!

it was a gimmick offense, you had three backs on the field at times one of them acting as the QB, prolike, no, gimmick like, yes!!!

Spread offenses is about 80% of college football… you dont think Arkansas was????

by Deke on Apr 28, 2008 11:43 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

And what is Dallas' offense?

Don’t you see them spreading their offense alot? Compared to Hawaii or Kentucky—Arkansas (from a RB perspective) ran alot more prolike running plays.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 2:35 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

A

This is the first time I’ve actually graded a Solo King Jerry draft with an “A” rating.

I kept questioning each selection - not where they were drafted - but the actual player himself… and darn if I didn’t like how they fit in with what our team is trying to do.

All personal feelings aside, here are my comments on the players the Cowboys drafted:

- Besides the obvious rhetoric that Felix Jones represents the faster, home-run threat at RB to complement the violent, between-the-tackles style of MB3… did anyone bother to think that Red Ball has some new wrinkles (involving Felix The Cat) that he’s probably planning for next season’s offense. Imagine bringing The Cat in motion, using him in the slot, or having him catch Romo passes in stride for a quick hitting gamebreaker. Garrett could also use The Cat in similar situations that Mike Martz used to use Marshall Faulk or in packages mirroring how Andy Reid uses Brian Westbrook. If teams will have one more thing to worry about with The Cat on the field, which could open things up for TO, Witten, and maybe - only maybe - Terry Glenn, if he bypasses surgery and plays in the ‘08-09 season.

- I love Mike Jenkins because he’s a fast, bold, playmaking ballhawk who can stay with his man in coverage, has superb closing speed, and can haul tail with da rock after a turnover. Plus, he’s very physical and can blow up opposing offensive players.

- Although I too questioned the selection of a TE in the 2nd Round, I must say that I cannot argue with the physical specimen and gluelike hands of this athletic tight end known as Martellus Bennett. I wonder if da King thought of Keith Jackson, the ex-Packers TE who played at wishbone OU who seldom passed, but caught everything his way when he got into the NFL. Of course, Bennett won’t have that kind of pressure on him because he’s backing up All-Pro Jason Witten. It’ll be interesting to see what Bennett can do in a pro-style passing offense.

- Love the Choice…. Tashard Choice to be exact. Being a Miami Hurricanes’ Fan, I watched Choice kill us twice - esp. in the game at Tech his junior season. Despite his sub-6’0” height, he’s a tough little warrior who plays with pain and excels between the tackles. Another thing not mentioned is how he has a nose for the end zone when in the red zone. He’s a definite upgrade over Tyson Thompson at the running back position - IMHO.

- Orlando Scandrick is the most intriguing selection to me. Talk about speed, talk about wanting the football, talk about productive special teams play, and talk about adding corner depth… this kid has a chance to be something special. In one game, he returned a blocked extra point for two points and a blocked FG for a TD. And at CB, he has the blazing 40 time to more than hang with his receiver.

- The only thing I know about Erik Walden is what I’ve read since yesterday and the workout video posted on this site. The man looks like a fine blend of power and intensity. Hopefully, the coaches will find a way to fit him in as an OLB or ILB to add some depth. He seems to have an outstanding work ethic and he appears to have a coachable attitude. For a sixth round pick, I have no problem with Walden here.

For the record, I cannot believe that I actually like what King Jerry did. But the icing on the cake has to be the two additional 3rd rounders and the extra 4th rounder he obtained for the 2009 NFL Draft.

www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]

by silverblue5 on Apr 28, 2008 10:54 AM CDT   0 recs

A strong B

Like most of you I scratched my head at the Bennett pick at first but after reading up a bit, he sounds like a promising player. I also would have leaned toward Mendenhall but don’t think the reasoning for grabbing Jones there is out of place. Love the Jenkins pick.Like the picks for next year and think they have added some good prospects to the roster on day 2. All in all very solid.

by clpark on Apr 28, 2008 11:00 AM CDT   0 recs

B-

Jones/Mendenhal thing is a little overblown. A back that amasses over 3,000 yards backing up DMc is a damn good back. My big problem is that we failed to beef up at NG. We really need a space eater to allow our current starter to move back to his natural position.

by HutHut on Apr 28, 2008 11:05 AM CDT   0 recs

Jerry did a good thing

sticking to his guns with Felix, even though Mendenhall slipped. That’s admirable.

I was disappointed they didn’t get a NT also. Really wanted Rubin or Okra.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 11:11 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

B

Yes, I would’ve taken Mendenhall, but if you’d told me pre-draft that we’d get Felix and Jenkins I wouldn’t have complained. Maybe Mendenhall dropped for a reason…

Overall, I thought it was a good draft, but I would’ve preferred to address some other depth issues. I don’t see another DE turned OLB being particularly necessary, and we really didn’t need another backup running back as early as we got him, although I do like Choice. If this is to give Jerry flexibility in the Barber negotiations, OK, but I still would’ve liked to see the ‘Boys address depth at other positions, particularly Safety.

Still, we won 13 games last year, addressed our two biggest needs and perhaps drafted some luxury guys. Solid draft, overall, just not necessarily the choices I would’ve made on day two.

by MeanMr.Mustard on Apr 28, 2008 11:27 AM CDT   0 recs

B+

Positives:
I hated the Jones move when we made it, but I loved it after the Choice pick. I see Choice as the true backup RB and Jones as Garrett’s shiny new toy on offense. Using Felix in the flat should draw the linebackers and safeties up and allow us to go over the top more effectively. Hell, Felix might have filled the need at WR; we can lineup Felix in the slant or outside, just like Faulk, Bush, and Westbrook. Felix may never be a typical three down running back, but he should get enough touches in the game to be considered a de facto starter. As for Choice, he can keep Barber fresh and split RB duties with Felix if Barber doesn’t stay after next year.

Some people will love the Jenkins pick and some will hate it, but it’s all based on personal preferences. Is work ethic or natural talent more important? Personally, I think that if Jenkins can get in the weight room and build up some more upper body strength, he’ll be just fine.

As for the fifth and sixth round picks, I have a rule about not getting upset over late round guys. Frankly, there wasn’t a player past the second round that could come in and make an impact. We have a full roster already, so it made sense to pick high upside guys who we can keep on the practice squad next year.

Negatives:
My only real problem with the draft weekend is the Fasano/Ayodele trade and the second round pick. It didn’t make much sense to trade our backup TE (a former second round pick) for a fourth round pick and then use our second round pick on another backup TE. I like Bennett as a long-term prospect, but this seemed like a bad use of resources.

by cstorm15 on Apr 28, 2008 11:49 AM CDT   0 recs

B+

Basically I gave them that grade because they didn’t reach for any players and in many cases got steals (Jenkins, Choice, Scandrick). You can’t go wrong with that strategy.

Anyhoo, the only problem I had with this draft is they did not address NT or SS.

by quincyyyyy on Apr 28, 2008 12:38 PM CDT   0 recs

A-

This was a GOOD draft for the Cowboy. The defensive back field is no longer a weakness. The front 7 are TOUGH.

Now what defense in the NFL wants to face the Cowboys. We have the receivers, qb, rb and OL. And not to for get a great punter and a lot better than average place kicker. Yes it would be nice to land another front line wide out. This team is set to make a run at the Super Bowl.

I live and die with the Dallas Cowboys

by stxshooter on Apr 28, 2008 12:44 PM CDT   0 recs

i think the smart teams

know what they are doing…

from hashmarks..

“Seven teams drafted two running backs: Miami, Baltimore, Denver, Detroit, San Diego, Dallas and Seattle. The Broncos, Lions, Chargers and Seahawks each drafted a player initially listed as a fullback among their two running backs;”

just got ownaged

by Longhorn on Apr 28, 2008 1:13 PM CDT   0 recs

C

We need a wide receiver. I didn’t think we would draft one, but I certainly thought we would trade for one. Didn’t happen, and I’m now not sure if it will. Plus, Felix over Mendenhall? I don’t agree with that. Both are good backs, but I firmly believe Mendenhall would have been better.

by Texas Our Texas on Apr 28, 2008 1:26 PM CDT   0 recs

Felix is more of a threat than Mendenhall

it’s that simple. Felix Jones has shown more over the long haul than Mendenhall. If we didn’t have Barber in place I would agree that Mendenhall would’ve been the better choice of the two. F. Jones adds the explosive threat out of the backfield and in the return game. Garrett is going to do some special things with this kid he couldn’t do with Julius.

by Boyzfan94 on Apr 28, 2008 2:08 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Thank you.

That #38 sure can hit!

by Bigrigga31 on Apr 28, 2008 2:37 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Agreed

And for our purposes, I think the fact that Felix was in a 2-back system in college is actually a major plus. He’s used to the role, and he has fewer miles on him. Remember how good Reggie Bush was his rookie year when McAllister was healthy? How he lined up everywhere and was practically a WR half the time? I think Jason Garrett remembers, and that’s why he was grinning ear to ear.

Mendenhall will probably be a great player for Pitt, but keep in mind they were going for the same thing as us: power and speed. I think Jones is a better fit for Dallas this year, and let’s not kid ourselves: this team is in win now mode.

by grapejoos on Apr 28, 2008 5:55 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

and what happened when McCallister got hurt??

Bush was rendered useless which is why Choice was drafted. If we would have drafted Mendenhall, the Choice pick wouldn’t be necessary.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 28, 2008 7:06 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

That is true

But now we are prepared for that eventuality moreso than the Saints were (assuming Choice is better than Aaron Steckel, which seems likely). Even if we had picked Mendenhall, we’d still need a #3 RB, so it’s hard for me to get too upset about using a 4th round pick to draft a good player at a need position.

I understand the concerns that some of you have, but in my opinion, the ceiling on a Felix/MB3 combo is much higher than a Mendenhall/MB3 combo in terms of overall productivity. Jones also helps us address the passing game in a way that Mendenhall wouldn’t.

At the end of the day, I think we have Jones because he’s the guy Garrett wanted. I’ll give Garrett the benefit of the doubt.

by grapejoos on Apr 28, 2008 8:04 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Too early to grade

but there was nothing that made me throw my sandwich at the television so that is good.

Grizz, I don’t mean to be pedantic, but it is not the New Jersey Ledger, it is called the Star Ledger, or the Newark Star Ledger, not that anyone should care about that sliver of NJ trivia

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Apr 28, 2008 2:04 PM CDT   0 recs

Grade: B

Although I agree with the previous post that it is too early to grade a draft class and it could take years to get the final grade, I would give the Cowboys a B. They did well with Felix Jones and others but did not add depth and youth to the Wide Receiver position.

http://myteamrivals.typepad.com/cowboyscorner/

by BillZe on Apr 28, 2008 2:10 PM CDT   0 recs

GRIZZ.... THANKS A TON FOR THIS POST...

Having all these links in one spot the day after the draft is PURE LUXURY

Tar Heels football will surprise this year

by DalaiLuke on Apr 28, 2008 3:24 PM CDT   0 recs

Question for Grizz. other admins...

Is there a way to get the links to open in a separate window / tab?

Tar Heels football will surprise this year

by DalaiLuke on Apr 28, 2008 3:25 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I'd give it a B

Every pick until Walden was projected to go higher than Dallas took them (Felix Jones was projected to go at exactly #22)

Walden was a huge reach that the Cowboys didn’t need to make. Especially now that they have signed Robertson from Georgia Tech. Wasted chance to get Corey Lynch S, Athyba Rubin NT, Peyton Hillis FB, Bryan Johnston OLB, Brandon Keith OT, etc. It’s nice that we stock piled a couple picks for next year, but all of the players listed were higher rated and at areas of greater need. Dallas could have taken any of them and still had the extra picks next year.

But, overall we got very good players rated higher than the spots Dallas drafted them. The 1st round was especially good. Both those guys are starters.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Apr 28, 2008 6:02 PM CDT   0 recs

A -

This was an excellent draft for a team with 13 Pro Bowl players. There wasn’t really a chance to add a pure starter into the lineup unless you considered the WR Thomas a starter opposite TO. Mendenhall would have fulfilled the same job that Jones will be doing, splitting time with Barber.

Like 99% of Cowboy fans, I was up in arms for a few minutes on the Mendenhall non-pick. After further consideration, I’m really beginning to like the Jones selection more and more. I really love the Tashard Choice in the 4th. Chris Long said Choice was the toughest runner he had faced, as did Calias Campbell.

Jenkins and Scandrik allow us to finally have some 3rd WR/slot coverage. It’s been a long time since I was comfortable with opposing teams running up 3-4 WR’s and us matching up. Also, both of these guys can fill in as backup Safeties.

Bennett is an interesting prospect. He has all the intangibles, unfortunately the Ags didn’t play to his strengths.

Add in a 3 and 4 next year, plus Adam Jones as a 4, I’m not sure if we could have done much better. Very efficient draft.

by Assassin on Apr 29, 2008 12:53 PM CDT   0 recs

BTW – there may be one 2008 starter come out of this draft. Jenkins may be good enough to give Anthony Henry some competition.

by Assassin on Apr 29, 2008 1:16 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Dallas Cowboys blog. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. You're welcome to join in the discussion; please follow the code of conduct for commentary.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Canty1_112207_360_small
Romo-Haters
Lasvegasstrip_small
RB TIME
Mad_as_hell_small
Why rookies need a salary cap
Lasvegasstrip_small
QB-Tiers
Romo2_101407_360_small
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Super Bowl
To-popcorn_small
Terry Glenn takes another step back from the ledge
Small
Joe Horn to Da Boys?
3724_small
There are good things in Texas afterall
Small
Training Camp 2008
Small
Adam Jones' new name - Reverend Jones

Post New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Profile3_small Dave Halprin (Grizz)

Authors

Newman_avatar_small Brandon W

Jordan_and_mama_1__small Tuna Helper

ad