Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Only time can judge the value of the draft

The 2008 NFL draft has finally come and gone. We spent so much time gearing up for this past weekend that it seems as if there's a feeling hanging around of "now what?" So, to satiate our thirst for all things NFL we turn around and instantly judge the draft, team by team. An "A" for this team and their picks, a "B" for that team and their picks, and so on and so forth. I have never really understood the fascination with automatically assigning a grade based on which team picked whom, the day after the draft! There is absolutely no way for anyone to judge how any of these players are going to work out in the NFL. They haven't even met with their coaches yet or picked up a play book. Sure, we have an idea of how a certain player might fit with a club but there are no guarantees, especially when it comes to the draft. I think the only way to really judge a team's draft is to look at the strategy they employed, how they executed their plan and if any glaring misjudgments were made.

For every Patrick Crayton that is drafted, I can give you three Skyler Greens. For every Peyton Manning, there are numerous Ryan Leafs. Just because a player was selected in the first round does not automatically make that player a star. Every year there are 32 players drafted in the first round (well, 31 this year), and on average less than half of those players pan out to be Pro Bowl players, or even long time starters for the team that drafted them. I'm sure that when a team selects a player with their number one pick they are certain that this is the guy. Problem is, it never works out that way across the board.

This brings me to the Felix Jones/Rashard Mendenhall debate. It's a very valid issue among Cowboys' fans and media alike. Immediately your thoughts go back to 2004 when the Cowboys found Steven Jackson sitting all pretty and ready to be drafted by them right there at #22. But the Cowboys were convinced they could get a valued running back in the second and traded away the pick to Buffalo. Steven Jackson went on to go to the Pro Bowl with St. Loius while Julius Jones is now playing playing with the Seattle Seahawks. Just like in 2004, the Cowboys had Rashard Mendenhall fall into their laps. Incredible! Everyone was certain that Mendenhall would be long gone before #22 but there he was. All the Cowboys had to do was write his name down on the draft card and hand it in. Instead, the Cowboys drafted Felix Jones, sending the Blogging The Boys community into a frenzy of emotion. How could Jerry Jones make the same mistake all over again.

To truly judge this pick, you have to step back and see it from the Cowboys point of view instead of a fan's. The Cowboys wanted to draft a running back who was a true complement to Marion Barber and who gives them big play potential every time he touches the ball. Mendenhall is not that player. He is a running back who need 20-25 carries a game to be effective and he would not get that playing behind Marion Barber. Jones has played in a two-back system his whole career and makes the most of it every time he touches the ball. He is a threat to take it to the house on any play he is on the field and is extremely versatile as well. Some may point out that Jones and Mendenhall had nearly the same amount of big plays last year, but then you have to realize that Mendenhall had 130 more carries than Jones.

A lot of you have brought up the question of what if Marion Barber is not here next year? Mendenhall would have been the perfect back to draft to be the franchise back of the future. Well, that's all well and good except the Cowboys are not rebuilding their team and are not looking for a running back of the future. The Cowboys are in the hunt to win now and to win it all. The Cowboys went into this draft with every intention of re-signing Marion Barber to be their long term running back. If that happens, then Mendenhall was not the player that fit this team. While everyone including me, thinks that Mendenhall was the better back of the two, the only way we can even know that is to just wait and see.

After picking Jones, the Cowboys made a quick trade to move up and select Mike Jenkins, giving up a fifth and seventh rounder in the process. Immediately, you scratch your head and think the Cowboys could have selected Jenkins at 22 and waited until 28 to grab Felix Jones. But then you realize that Pittsburgh would have nabbed Mendenhall and Tennessee would have selected Jones at 24, leaving the Cowboys with  whole lot of nothing when it comes to first round running backs. The Cowboys had a plan with who they wanted in the draft and Jerry Jones made the trades to make it happen.

Martellus Bennett was initially a head-scratcher. Why would the Cowboys draft a tight end just one day after trading one away? But if you wait until the draft was over to judge the pick, you see that the Cowboys didn't draft a FB. The Cowboys last year used the tight end a lot as a blocker but since Fasano never developed his blocking ability Jason Witten too often was called upon to block. This took one of the Cowboys best weapons right out of the game. The Cowboys love to use the tight end as a wham blocker out of the fullback position as well as helping out in pass protection. If Bennett can come in and do a better job of that than Fasano, then Witten's job just got a whole lot easier.

All you have to do is take a look at the clip Grizz posted of Tashard Choice to realize why he was drafted. Some use this pick as an argument to prove that Felix Jones wasn't the right pick. I contend the Cowboys would have drafted Choice even if the had picked Mendenhall. The man's intangibles, drive and leadership abilities are off the chart and something that was sorely lacking on the team in key situations last year. It doesn't matter if that spark comes from a rookie as long as it comes from somewhere. Tashard Choice will be a vital asset to this team in ways that most likely will never show up on a stats sheet. It doesn't hurt that he's a pretty good running back as well.

If you look at the draft picks as a whole for the Cowboys as well as the guys they are bringing in as free agents it becomes clear the team is making a concerted effort to get faster. Much faster. The Cowboys went into the draft with cornerback as a weakness and walked out of it with the same position a major strength. Immediately, the Cowboys have vastly improved their defense. With this group of defensive backs it is hard to think those big third down plays we saw last year will haunt us again this year.

The only real questionable pick in my eyes was the selection of Erik Walden. I just don't understand why the Cowboys decided to reach for a tweener defensive linemen when it seems that he might not have been drafted at all.

It's tough to not make an instant judgment on how the Cowboys drafted. Sometimes its easy to question a move though, like last year when Miami drafted Ted Ginn in the first round. The Cowboys didn't have a glaring issue like that though. They certainly made a very interesting choice with their first pick that will be debated all the way until the first snap of the regular season. Only then, when these players actually make it onto the field with the team that drafted them, can the true judgments be made.

For what it's worth, I give the Cowboys a B.

0 recs | Comment 62 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

I think in the sixth round you get BPA

because its the sixth round and you are not going to fill any need at that point. Although there are exceptions like punter, kicker, long snapper, and FB where you can fill a need for the immediate future in the sixth.

by quincyyyyy on Apr 28, 2008 8:25 PM CDT   0 recs

Walden wasn't BPA at the top of the 6th

So no matter how you look at it, the Boys blew that pick. Not a need position, and not the BPA.
Looking at Walden, I have to wonder what they are going to do with him? He is built more like an ILB than OLB.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Apr 28, 2008 8:59 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

In his interview on The Ticket

Walden mentioned that he is comfortable in coverage over the middle, as well as covering the tight end or RB out of the backfield.

by Brandon W on Apr 28, 2008 9:02 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

How do you know that.

I don’t think any of us is privy to the Cowboys draft board, and he could very well have been.

by quincyyyyy on Apr 28, 2008 9:26 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm guessing

But I’d say it’s a good guess that there were better options available with 2 full rounds remaining.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Apr 28, 2008 11:52 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Passing on Steven Jackson...

People forget… had the Cowboys drafted Jackson, they probably would have had a different record that year and would not have been able to get DeMarcus Ware in the following draft… got to take all the factors into the equation…. I’m happy with this years draft

by nzach54 on Apr 28, 2008 8:28 PM CDT   0 recs

The man’s intangibles, drive and leadership abilities are off the chart and something that was sorely lacking on the team in key situations last year.

Not sure I follow your thinking on this comment.

I like the premise of your article. Grading drafts is no more an exact science than the draft itself; it will be several years before a true grade can be reached.

But I must disagree with your assessment of the Mendenhall / Jones debate. While I was hoping for F. Jones to be the man when the day started, I was SHOCKED we didn’t take the MUCH HIGHER rated Mendenhall when he fell to us. The argument that Jones is the more complimentary back simply doesn’t hold water. Mendenhall posted a faster 40 than Jones at the Combine, and is considered a speedster AS WELL AS a bruiser.

Ultimately, all our guessing will only be resolved after a year or three. For now, I am hoping all the Jones supporters are right. I also love the guy. I just hope we didn’t pass up a perennial pro-bowler.

Tar Heels football will surprise this year

by DalaiLuke on Apr 28, 2008 9:02 PM CDT   0 recs

I personally never argued for the pick of Jones over Mendenhall

I wanted us to look at it from the Cowboys’ perspective.

I think we hold WAY to much water in these “experts” draft ratings. True, for the most part they are in the ballpark but they can’t be perfect every time. If they were, then Emmitt Smith would have been selected #1 overall instead of being a “reach” at 17 when the Cowboys traded up to get him. He was too slow and too small, remember?

And as far as the Tashard Choice blurb: The Cowboys lacked a killer instinct and basically a backbone when it mattered most last year. That could be attributed to the coaches, or whatever, but too often I think the Cowboys relied on talent alone far too much and it cost us int he playoff game when the Giants showed how desire to win and drive could get you over that hump for a championship. The Cowboys drafted several players this year who were proven leaders on their teams who can start infusing that enthusiasm into our team. Choice is the exceptional in that role.

by Brandon W on Apr 28, 2008 9:10 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Here is an ESPN assessment that speaks to your point...

5. Felix Jones, RB, Dallas Cowboys
The Cowboys could’ve taken Rashard Mendenhall with this pick, but Jones wasn’t a bad choice, either. Jones has that electric speed that will make him a nice counterpart to bruising runner Marion Barber. He’s also comfortable as a change-of-pace back after sharing time with Darren McFadden at Arkansas. Throw in Jones’ kick return ability and his underrated pass-catching skills, and you’ve got a versatile weapon who can elevate an already potent offense.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft08/columns/story?columnist=chadiha_jeffri&id=3371140&lpos=spotlight&lid=tab1pos2

At this point, as you say in your article and above, it’s all subjective opinions. And as I said, I hope the Jones supporters are right!

One thing you can measure a bit is character, and Choice looks like a real leader.

Tar Heels football will surprise this year

by DalaiLuke on Apr 28, 2008 10:22 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

It's not an exact science

Great write up Brandon. We need to have faith in the scouting department. There are hits and misses every year for most every team. You can judge a players physical talent, but it’s really difficult to judge a guys heart or his mental fortitude.

by obiru on Apr 28, 2008 9:05 PM CDT   0 recs

"Only time can judge"

I agree as a general rule, but I think in the Felix-Mendenhall debate we should be able to judge pretty effectively after this year.

Felix was clearly grabbed as a home run threat for this season. That doesn’t mean we don’t expect him to improve and contribute down the road, but obviously if you’re picking the “back of the future,” you go with Mendenhall. I disagree with popular wisdom that suggests that if Mendenhall becomes a perennial pro bowler we made the wrong choice. If Felix provides an added dimension to our offense this season that Mendenhall reasonably would not have, it was a good pick.

by MeanMr.Mustard on Apr 28, 2008 9:11 PM CDT   0 recs

Nice Work Brandon

Good , balanced analysis.

If these picks get us deeper into the playoff then it doesn’t matter what the draft grade was or wasn’t.

It’s all about that elusive playoff run, and onto the big one…..

by oldtimer on Apr 28, 2008 9:20 PM CDT   0 recs

My son is deployed

and he asked me by email my opinion of the draft. Of course I gave him this blog site so he could judge for himself, but I also graded it an “A”. They got exactly what they needed for a team that went 13-3 last season. They got better where they were deficient; they answered the apparent strategies of NFC East opponents (more WRs); they mainitained cap flex to sign good players down the road. This was a smart, well-thought out draft.

by dunkman on Apr 28, 2008 9:32 PM CDT   0 recs

Good luck to your son, dunk

Tar Heels football will surprise this year

by DalaiLuke on Apr 28, 2008 10:23 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Somebody let you pro-create?????

I mean. . .thanks for his service!

Bum's Boy Boyz

by JerrodWheeler on Apr 28, 2008 10:33 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Hmmmm Good point

The postman sure has seemed bummed out the last few months….

by dunkman on Apr 29, 2008 5:16 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

LOL

Oh you’re a quick one Dunk.

Good luck to your son, hope he comes back safe and sound, ya know, so the mailman doesn’t go postal.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Apr 29, 2008 2:25 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Finally

Common Sense.

just got ownaged

by Longhorn on Apr 28, 2008 9:40 PM CDT   0 recs

blah blah blah

like most of your posts.. a lot of blah blah to make a point..atleast you don’t use youtube clips to make jokes..

i can live with the felix jones pick..i think that if you wanted a back to compliment barber you could have gotten one in the later rounds..i would assume that a team’s first overall pick is one that they want to start at some point in the future, and not play back up forever

by bryangene on Apr 28, 2008 9:47 PM CDT   0 recs

Hey man

How about showing a little respect. Brandon and Tuna Helper work for nothing to help make this blog a great place for Cowboys fans. If you disagree with their posts say so, but there’s no need for taking personal shots like that.

by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on Apr 28, 2008 10:34 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I agree, Grizz...

I like to debate the content, but there’s no doubt both Brandon and Tuna deserve tremendous props for all the EXCELLENT posts they offer. BTB was great before, and the additional input only adds value to the site.

bryangene, we’re all entitled to our opinions… and this is a great place to debate… but ultimately we’re all Cowboy fans!!!

Tar Heels football will surprise this year

by DalaiLuke on Apr 28, 2008 10:40 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

didn't mean for it to be taken as a personal shot

i was aiming towards constructive criticism; my fault if it came out any other way

by bryangene on Apr 28, 2008 11:21 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

How could your post be taken as constructive critism?

Blah, blah, blah… real constructive.

Brandon’s articles are very well written and informative. I think both him and TH are doing a great job helping out Grizz.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Apr 29, 2008 12:03 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

hmm

i never said they weren’t informative, just too wordy

by bryangene on Apr 29, 2008 12:16 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

LOL

Words, words, words…damn all these words getting in the way of my reading.
OK, I gotcha. I guess it was just the use of “blah, blah, blah” to describe a writers hard work that came across a bit harsh.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Apr 29, 2008 12:25 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

LOL

it is just the style he chooses to use. see grizz’s posts..direct and to the point

by bryangene on Apr 29, 2008 9:54 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

special teams

is the other significant area greatly improved through the drafts and trades. it also went from a weakness to a strength, as we now have several skilled return guys to choose from, and some improvement in coverage. I think this was a significant factor in how they graded these guys and decided their picks, including taking F. Jones over Mendenhall.

Overall we have improved at several positions, and diminished at none. Zach Thomas is a good improvement over Ayodele. Adam Jones (assuming he plays) and Jenkins are a huge upgrade from Nate Jones and Jacques Reeves. Felix is likely a big boost over Julius, and the same for Choice over Tyson Thompson . And Bennett has a strong potential to be a bigger contributor than Fasano.

We can look at the details and find areas to criticize, but overall I feel like they did a great job coming in with a plan and executing it well to make the team better than it was last year, with the goal of seriously contending for the SB this year. And a contender we will be. Yes, I know we need to win just one playoff game first, but I certainly hope we don’t stop at only one!

by scottmaui on Apr 28, 2008 9:55 PM CDT   0 recs

I can't see why you couldn't start

Mendenhall and use MB3 off the bench as he has been accustomed to since college. Can’t understand how Jones is a better complement to MB3 when Mendenhall is every bit as expolsive as Jones.

And more importantly, Mendenahll can pick up blitzes and keep Romo upright, Jones could get Romo killed.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 28, 2008 10:13 PM CDT   0 recs

Good point, Terry...

If that is indeed the scouting report – Mendenhall rates higher in pass protection – then the pick becomes even more questionable.

Tar Heels football will surprise this year

by DalaiLuke on Apr 28, 2008 10:30 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Does Mendenhall offer anything to special teams ??????.....NOPE.

breaks your tie…...doesn’t it ???

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

by BoyzRback on Apr 29, 2008 12:07 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Terry's Right On

Why people call Jones ‘more explosive’ than Mendenhall I have no idea. Did ANYBODY in this community watch Mendenhall light up USC? As a die-hard ‘SC fan, I did. USC had one of the best, and certainly one of the fastest, defenses in all of college football last year (their offense was uncharacteristically flat) and Mendenhall torched them. I understand all the skepticism about Combine times, but Mendenhall did run a FASTER 40 than Jones. Jones was a back-up RB that got to play against defenses that were exhaling with DMac out. Horrible, horrible pick. And, at the risk of sounding like Bryangene, pretty superficial analysis of the Mendenhall vs. Jones debate. You take the best RB available, not the ‘most complementary’ – this isn’t a Vice-President for goodness sake!

by ol hickory on Apr 29, 2008 1:31 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

well said hickory

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 29, 2008 7:35 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I wouldn't say 3 thousandths of a second

is an appreciably better time. Straight line speed they are the same, but in terms of quickness if you watched either play Felix Jones wins hands down.

by quincyyyyy on Apr 29, 2008 9:18 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

tie?? you got to be kidding

there is no tie comparing Mendenhall to Jones, as Mendenhall is by far and away the superior talent.

Who cares if he doesn’t play ST, I don’t know of any feature backs who do. Miles does a fine job of returning kicks.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 29, 2008 7:34 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

yeah....so superior that

he couldn’t beat out pierre Thomas…LOL

Mendenhall plays for the steelers now

Felix is our lightening….and he’s wearing a star on his helmet…..

Felix is my guy…..who cares about mendenhall…..He’s a backup to willie parker.

Felix is a cowboy….and I’m excited to see what he’s going to bring to the cowboys offense

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Apr 29, 2008 8:05 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

So let me get this straight

The deciding factor for taking one player over another is whether he can play special teams. Are we talking about a fifth round player here!!!!!!!!

Sorry, not when it comes to a first round talent player, that cant be the deciding factor for taking a player at the running back positon, it should be whether the kid has the ability to be a franchise back, not a part time back.

by Deke on Apr 29, 2008 7:44 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Well we have a franchise back in MB3

the Jones had to decide who would make our team better. With Felix Jones it offers our team more versatility in terms of what plays Garrett can call. Having a faster less tough version of Barber as our second back would limit what Garrett could do with this offense.

You guys are asking the wrong question. Its not who is the better all-around back, its who would make this team better. The answer is Felix Jones.

by quincyyyyy on Apr 29, 2008 9:22 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

And you came to that conclusion after one game.

I like barber, in his role as a change of pace back, few are better, but if you dont limit his carries, he’s less effective. there is no way you can come to the conclusion that he’s a lead back after one game. In the second half of the Giant playoff game after the cowboys dominated the first half in time of possession, you’d expect the cowboys offense to take control of the game in the second half, but the opposite happened, and Barber was gassed, anyone that watched that game seen that and wasn’t effective in the running game. I’m not putting it all on him either, the Oline appeared gassed as well.

We aren’t asking the wrong question…. Derek lassic was drafted as a change of pace back, Sherman Williams was suppose to spell Emmitt and as a change of pace back. This is the same philosphy that Jerry used when running the draft in the ninties, drafting backups or complementory players, thats a mistake…

this isn’t whether one likes Jones or mendenhall more, nobody hates Jones, its the type of back that you draft in the first round, especially when a concensus pro franchise lead type back falls in your lap, AGAIN, and you pass, AGAIN.

by Deke on Apr 29, 2008 11:38 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Barber was given the ball 23 or 24 times in the first half

and gained over 100 yards. Why don’t you think he could be a 20-25 carry back?

The problem with the playoff game is we gave him an abnormal amount of carries for even a franchise back. LT only gets around 20 carries a game. But honestly I would put 75% of the blame on the o-line for not making holes. Now we are used to MB3 making holes for himself but when you are given the ball that much you can do only so much.

Now as for Felix, comparing him to Sherman Williams is a mistake. Felix is built a lot better than him at 5’101/2 and 207lbs. Felix has better size and is more talented than either of the backs you mentioned (lassic being a mid round pick).

IMO you not only have to draft the best player but also who would be best for your team. And I don’t think drafting Mendenhall would make our team even better than drafting someone with a completely different skill set from MB3, like Felix Jones.

by quincyyyyy on Apr 29, 2008 12:01 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Agreed

I think Felix is best for the Cowboys, at least for this year. And if MB3 is re-signed, then I think he’s better long-term, too.

For me the bottom line is whether Felix is good for us; I could care less how Mendenhall does for Pitt. The reason that passing on Jackson hurt so bad is that JJ ended up being a bust. If Felix is good for Dallas, the rest is a footnote.

by grapejoos on Apr 29, 2008 1:00 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

One thing that no one is talking about

Is Mendenhall’s fumbling problems. I think that, and his lack of more than one good season probably scared a few teams away. The Cowboys offense has become one of the better at holding on to the ball (Gurode’s wild shotgun snaps aside). Not that his fumbling can’t be corrected, but it might have been part of the reason he fell so far.

I think also the Cowboys just liked Felix Jones better. As Boyz mentioned, Felix Jones does have the advantage of returning kicks very well.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Apr 29, 2008 12:13 AM CDT   0 recs

BW's Title offers the bottom line here

Nobody can say whether or not we just picked up the next Emmitt. Only time will tell.

Tar Heels football will surprise this year

by DalaiLuke on Apr 29, 2008 1:02 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Yeah it'll be interesting

to watch each one develop. I wasn’t happy that we took Jones, but I’m open minded enough to wait and see.

I did get a kick out of Kiper judging whether a pick was good or bad based on his rankings. So Mel, it’s your way or the highway? Must be nice.

by dunkman on Apr 29, 2008 5:19 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I also was hoping for Mendenhall, but BWs title says it all...

We can spout opinions until we’re blue in the face, but the proof will not come around until October or November – or maybe not for a few years! Kiper and all the other talking heads get paid to fill air-time… he’s just more arrogant about his opinions.. or is it foolish?

Felix Jones will be an excellent back. So will Mendenhall. Guess which one will be better is next to impossible. If Mendenhall was all that (as so many here believe – me included), why did 22 teams pass on him? Reminds me of a QB named Quinn.

Tar Heels football will surprise this year

by DalaiLuke on Apr 29, 2008 12:09 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

same can be said about Ware

ten teams passed on him too, and believe me, alot of cowboy fans wanted Mike Willaims selected. I thank Matt Millen every day for taking that choice out of Jerry’s hands…

by Deke on Apr 29, 2008 12:16 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Yeah, but...

Several teams with dire needs at RB passed on Mendenhall, including the Bears. A lot of teams passed on Randy Moss too, so it means nothing. I think this just came down to who the coaches wanted.

by grapejoos on Apr 29, 2008 1:02 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

The bears were never going to take a back that high after The Benson pick

a couple years back, a guy that I said at the time would never be an good NFL back , the bears have gotten burnt recently over backs they took early in drafts.

Its not just need only, but the value taken for a teams particular need.

This was a jerry Jones pick, plain and simple..

Passing on Moss was a smart move for the cowboys. With Aikman soon to retire because of concussions and the cowboys heading into a salary cap nightmare, it would of never worked with Moss here with no cap room and no franchise QB

by Deke on Apr 29, 2008 1:34 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

It wasn't just the Bears

Houston and Detroit also passed on Mendenhall. Maybe they had bigger needs, but they picked guys with much lower consensus grades in the end.

They’re all Jerry Jones picks. Felix was picked because that’s the guy Garrett wanted for his offense. I think the logic is sound. If the Cowboys target a player and think he’s the guy, they should stick with that when the time comes to pick.

Interesting argument on Moss, I definitely hadn’t heard that take before. Seems to me that Dallas and a bunch of other teams probably regret not taking the best WR since Rice. But my only point with Moss is that good players get passed up too, so it actually could be taken as a pro-Mendenhall point.

My bottom line is that I think this Mendenhall debate is a silly argument. He may be a great RB. He’s not what the Cowboys were looking for. They aren’t doing a RB by committee because they’re forced to, they’re doing it because they want to.

by grapejoos on Apr 29, 2008 6:29 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Great post Brandon!

And you’re absolutely correct…Time will tell.
I like the felix jones pick
there was a reason mendenhall dropped so far.
I don’t put much stock in combine times
I know football speed….I know Felix is a THREAT every time he touches the football.

We’ll see what Felix brings to this team….And I for one will be cheering him on ALL THE WAY!

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Apr 29, 2008 8:09 AM CDT   0 recs

Strech

I think no Player in the Sixth round can really be called a strech. Over 65% the time these guys never make the team. If he can come in and rush off the edge with Spend we founda gem. I think of compare him to a Trent Cole the pick makes a lot of sense..

I think Tellus gives us a big time Red Zone threat who can split out and catch the fade or a jump Ball. We really don’t have a Jump Ball threat. TO is a great WR,but going up for a Jump ball is not an area he excels in. Tellus is 6’6” with a 39 inch vert and basketball background. There is not a defender who can handle that in the Red Zone

by Wmillion on Apr 29, 2008 12:16 PM CDT   0 recs

I agree Wmillion

Bennett will be an amazing weapon for Romo in addition to T.O., Witten, Glenn and Crayton.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 29, 2008 1:59 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

MendenHall

I think Mendenhall’s performance should not be directly tied to Felix Jones and Dallas. There were a lot of teams with a glaring need at RB that passed on him too, Houston and Detroit are few teams that come to mind.

We didn’t have a need for Bell Cow type RB, we took the guy we thought was better suited for our team. We brought them both in for interviews, something about Felix made Jerry think he can contribute and make us winner.

Us passing on Stephen Jackson was Parcell’s idea, he was enamored with Julius..

I trust Jerry on this one.

by Wmillion on Apr 29, 2008 12:23 PM CDT   0 recs

Kevin Jones
Us passing on Stephen Jackson was Parcell’s idea, he was enamored with Julius

not true sir, infact the cowboys had kevin Jones rated as their top back on their draft board, they just thought that there wasn’t much difference between S. Jackson, K.Jones and J.Jones, they thought the value was to move down into the second round and still get a comparable back, they were wrong…

by Deke on Apr 29, 2008 1:41 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Tid Bit

Solomon Wilcox on Sirius NFL Radio stated that several teams maybe 5-7 teams had Felix Jones Valued Higher then Mendenhall pointing to his YPC. He said the number was something that couldn’t be ignored.

He went on stay that he wouldn’t be suprised if FJones went ahead of Mendenhall

by Wmillion on Apr 29, 2008 12:30 PM CDT   0 recs

Sure he does!!!

Did he ever say any such thing before the draft, I doubt it. YPC isn’t something scouts look at when they make their evaluations of players, comparing a every down back in mendenhall to a part time back in Jones who averaged 11 carries a game and had 16 receptions for the season…

thats like saying the cowboys drafted Scandrick because he averaged 46 yards per kickoff return..

by Deke on Apr 29, 2008 1:48 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

But we did draft Scandrick b/c he averaged 46 yds / kickoff

didn’t we ? (J/K)

Tar Heels football will surprise this year

by DalaiLuke on Apr 29, 2008 2:08 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

LOL!!!

Really!!!! I thought we drafted him because he played on a blue field…..I stand corrected!!!!

by Deke on Apr 29, 2008 3:12 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I like the tandem RB idea, it's worked well for Dallas

Maybe Jerry didn’t want to get a guy who could carry the load. That could potentially lead to headaches down the road if the Boys wanted to keep MB3, but Mendenhall would be demanding the bulk of the carries. Just another possible reason Felix is a better fit. He is used to sharing the carries and it’s worked out great for him. I can’t remember the last time 2 RB’s from the same college team both went in the 1st round. Embrace the tandem RB movement.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Apr 29, 2008 2:43 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

how bout 2006 Ronnie Brown and Cadillac Williams

not only did both go in the 1st rd, but both went in the top 10.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 29, 2008 3:01 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Very good

I already forgot about them. Cadillac Williams, another example of how risky it is to take a RB high in the draft.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Apr 29, 2008 3:37 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Dallas Cowboys blog. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. You're welcome to join in the discussion; please follow the code of conduct for commentary.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Canty1_112207_360_small
Romo-Haters
Lasvegasstrip_small
RB TIME
Mad_as_hell_small
Why rookies need a salary cap
Lasvegasstrip_small
QB-Tiers
Romo2_101407_360_small
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Super Bowl
To-popcorn_small
Terry Glenn takes another step back from the ledge
Small
Joe Horn to Da Boys?
3724_small
There are good things in Texas afterall
Small
Training Camp 2008
Small
Adam Jones' new name - Reverend Jones

Post New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini