Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Jerry Jones discusses the Pacman Jones incident Bar-right-arrows



Labor issues and the NFL

 

I think the media will be at the OTA today so I’m waiting for a report out of them.

In the meantime, the opting-out of the CBA by the owners is the big story. The owners have a few issues that are rankling them, including the cost of labor and the rising costs of real-estate/stadiums etc. They want some help from the players in that regard, but Gene Upsahw is sounding an early antagonistic tone.

"The only thing that they have said about what is fair for the players is that we're getting too much," Gene Upshaw, the executive director of the NFL Players Association, said in a teleconference. "They are saying that we have not addressed the cost of stadiums, and we don't recognize those costs. I don't know how they can come to those conclusions after what we've done all these years with helping to finance stadiums. We're the only union to ever do that.

"You get a club like the Dallas Cowboys, who will be getting somewhere between $150,000 for a premium seat [in their new stadium] that used to sell in Carolina for like $12,000. That's a big change in revenue. They want us to pay for some [of] the improvements in stadiums, but they don't want to give us any assets for doing that. They want us to just pay for it; we're not going to do that."

Ha! You just knew Jerry World would come up in this conversation. It’s early, they'll launch many more shots across the bow before they get serious about negotiating this thing. Another issue the owners will attack is the rising cost of rookie contracts.

Gene Upshaw said Roger Goodell told him owners have problems with rookie salaries. Miami Dolphins tackle Jake Long, the first pick in the April draft, is the highest-paid offensive lineman in the league despite having not played a down.

 Hallelujah! This is something they have to get under control, its bad enough if you pick a bust with an early first round pick, but to compound the problem with the weight of a huge contract is bad business. They need to find some sanity in this area.

Here’s another story from the L.A. Times that lays out more of the issues. 

If a new CBA can’t be reached by the 2010 season, it becomes an uncapped year. Speculation is already going on about what Jerry Jones and Daniel Snyder might do under those circumstances. 

But 2010 would be an uncapped year, in which the Dallas Cowboys and Washington Redskins could turn into the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox of the National Football League. Without a new collective bargaining agreement, teams such as the Cowboys and Redskins would be allowed to spend without any limits -– and likely would.

 Wheee! Labor turmoil is fun. Not really. They need to get it together before things get really crazy. I’ve always believed that revenue-sharing and a salary cap are two of the things that help the NFL stay at the top in sports leagues. Adding a rookie structure would be a great benefit, too. But please, at all costs, avoid a lockout in 2011.

Star_medium

Look ahead to our first regular season game with this article on the Cleveland Browns. 

0 recs | Comment 10 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I think the real sticky issue will be

a rookie cap that will proposed by the owners. Upshaw said the players will definitely not agree to that so this could cause things to get ugly.

Hopefully, the owners stand firm on this issue.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on May 21, 2008 1:09 PM CDT   0 recs

I don't understand why Upshaw said that

He is representing the NFL players, the guys that will get cut to make room for the draft picks’ salaries. Less money for the new guys means more money for the established players.
That would seem like the easiest point for the 2 sides to agree on.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on May 21, 2008 3:51 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Jeez
But 2010 would be an uncapped year, in which the Dallas Cowboys and Washington Redskins could turn into the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox of the National Football League. Without a new collective bargaining agreement, teams such as the Cowboys and Redskins would be allowed to spend without any limits -– and likely would.

I wish journalist had to take an entrance exam or something. While I find it highly probable that theforeskins will not have one of the top 8 records in the league, the chances that the Cowboys will be out of the top 8 with the roster we are building is slim to none. I know we all think that it would be great if Jerry could pick out all the golden cherries from free agency in the year North Texas will be hosting the Superbowl. There are just too many factors working against the winning teams and the top tier talent. Dont forget that a player would have to be in the league for 6 years and not 4, so the available talent would be slimmer then usual.

On the other side of that coin, Dallas could afford to keep its own players at a much higher number to keep them out of the mix, but that is hardly Red Sox or Yankee type spending.

Bottom line is before mediots go off half cocked, they need to do some research.

by Impatient on May 21, 2008 1:58 PM CDT   0 recs

here's the thing sportswriters don't realize

Spending freely without a salary cap like the Yankees and BoSox will not work in football to build successful teams. Baseball is far less than a team sport than football. Baseball has some team chemistry issues like a SS and 2ndbaseman turning a double play and a catcher knowing his pitchers, pitcher needing good fielders behind him, but for the most part baseball is really all about hitting, pitching, fielding and running the bases all of which are individual skills and matchups. A players individual success is certainly not dependent on his teammates and vica versa. A hitter isn’t going to receive help from any teammates in the batter’s box, another teammate isn’t going to help a pictcher throw strikes or field balls.

Football however is the ultimate team sport where each player is totally dependent on the players around him to be successful and the team works like a machine where all the parts have to move in harmony for the team to achieve success. OL have to know what the others are doing at all times, QBs and WRs have to be on the same page at all times, defensive schemes require knowing your other teammates tendencies.

Therefore just acquiring the most talent will not always insure success in football, team chemistry is not only important, its a necessity, and it can’t be bought by rich owners, it has to be achieved on the field through work and reps.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on May 21, 2008 2:47 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm not sure about the assumption here

Spending tons of money doesn’t guarantee anything in any of the big 4 sports. It helps, but only if you spend it wisely. The Yankees, Knicks, and NY Rangers all know this well, as do many other teams. The Cowboys had a huge salary when they were winning Super Bowls, and have a top salary now. The Pats also pay a lot, etc. Having effectively unlimited money would help a ton. Football is all about chemistry, but star players can develop chemistry together. Look what a FA/trade spree brought the Pats last year (Welker, Moss, Thomas).

So, I do think it would be a big deal, would benefit the Cowboys, and I think it would be fair to criticize them if they won titles doing so. I’d take it, but I think the relative equality in football is what makes it so great and provides parity. The owners and players can work something out on the rookie salaries, I would think…it makes no sense! The owners working something out together will be a tougher task I think. There’s a big disparity between the Pats, Cowboys, Skins, etc. and the Bills, etc. in terms of financial power, and there are bound to be disagreements.

by grapejoos on May 21, 2008 4:22 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I agree, but my point was

the star players in football need time to develop chemistry with each other even though Moss and Welker did fit in nicely with the Pats, however, ultimately they didn’t get it done. They still need some years to learn each other.

Baseball players on the other can come right in the very first year and be effective because hitting, pitching or fielding a ball is the same no matter what uniform you’re wearing or who you’re playing with.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on May 21, 2008 4:39 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

This is really reaching Terry
ultimately they didn’t get it done. They still need some years to learn each other.

18-0 and you want to use this to support your argument?

The bottom line here is that money can create an uneven playing field. While there are examples of teams spending money and not getting results, it remains rare to be a “have-nots” champion. Money matters, and if you give a quality GM enough cash, he can create a powerhouse. The author here simply points to baseball as an example.

What’s the big deal? This seems logical enough.

Tar Heels football will surprise this year

by DalaiLuke on May 22, 2008 6:32 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

AND ... I hope we get a year or two of "free market" trading

Jerry has been getting quality guys through FA, Dan Snyder will continue to punt… I see this as only helping the Cowboys. When Zach Thomas is getting long in the teeth in a couple of years, who here would complain if we went out and bribed / bought the next Ray Lewis from a smaller-market team?

Dallas already is as close as the NFL gets to the Yankees, who cares? Good for us.

Tar Heels football will surprise this year

by DalaiLuke on May 22, 2008 6:36 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm just saying you can't buy

a great football team like you can buy a great baseball team. Great baseball teams are a collection of great individual players, the same can’t be said in football. There are more team chemistry issues in football, which is why building through the draft and developing young players who can work many years together is the only way to go.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on May 22, 2008 7:48 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Tell that to Detroit, Yanks' and the Met's.....

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

"If you don’t take him off the field as a coach, he will just about die out there," Jerry Jones said. "That impacted my decision. It’s a Michael Irvin-type work ethic. That’s what we are talking about with Felix Jones."
- Owner/G.M of the Dallas Cowboys , Jerry Jones

by BoyzRback on May 24, 2008 10:36 AM CDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Dallas Cowboys blog. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. You're welcome to join in the discussion; please follow the code of conduct for commentary.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Romo2_101407_360_small
A More Balanced View
Im002151_small
State of the Union
Vue-bas-1_small
Tony Romo vs Eli Manning
Small
Greatest Draft of Jerry Jones Era?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Week 6 Madden '09 Simulation
Small
Are 'disciplinarians' proven winners, or overrated?
Small
Wade Phillips is Broken
Small
Anyone from the Blog attending the game in PHX this weekend?
To-popcorn_small
Felix Jones chases Beattie Feathers' 74-year-old YPA record - SI.com
Small
You can own a Cowboys stadium END ZONE!
Small
No disciplinary action by team vs Adam Jones
Small
Ed Werder reporting TNew has sports hernia
Small
Pac-man Jones at it again
Perf_small
Where is Felix in the Passing Game

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Profile3_small Dave Halprin (Grizz)

Authors

Newman_avatar_small Brandon W

G_small Tuna Helper

ad

Site Meter