Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Hugh Douglas Admits To Stealing From Jaguars

The Cowboys wide receiver paradox

 

It’s not often that you have an offense that roars through a regular season setting club records and yet is still questioned in terms of personnel. That is the Dallas Cowboys fate this offseason. One part of the equation was obvious and the Cowboys obviously fixed it. Dallas dispatched their third string running back, Tyson Thompson, early in the offseason while simultaneously displaying no intent at all to bring back one part of its dual running back combo, Julius Jones. This left them with only Marion Barber who was tendered at the highest level as a restricted free agent all but assuring his place on the 2008 roster. Once the RFA deadline passed the Cowboys had the Barbarian for this year and then added Felix Jones and Tashard Choice in the draft giving them a full stable of backs for the 2008 season. Problem solved.

The other part of the equation, the wide receivers, is a little more nebulous than running back and hasn’t been addressed in any meaningful way so far. The question is: Does it need to be addressed? Here is where the paradox comes into place. The Cowboys offense was a high-powered machine for most of the season and the wide receiver position was part of that explosion. So why did almost all the experts list WR as a need in the draft and why did the Cowboys seemingly acknowledge this need by pursuing a veteran through a trade that never came to fruition?

Even today, guys like Pat Kirwan are still referring to this problem.

Lots of people predicted the Cowboys would select a receiver early in the draft, but they never took one even though they had many opportunities to do so. The pressure point(s) in this decision fall in three places: 1. Can Terry Glenn stay healthy? 2. Can Patrick Crayton continue to grow? 3. Will Jerry Jones continue to look for a trade for a marquee player? Wideouts Early Doucet, Earl Bennett and Mario Manningham were still on the board when the Cowboys took tight end Martellus Bennett at the No. 61 spot. One of those players might have been able to help but maybe not enough to skip a player like Bennett, who will play in the Cowboys' two tight end sets. The best thing Dallas can do to relieve the pressure on the receivers is to find a way to make a trade before the season.

 

Yesterday, I linked to a Peter King article that pushed the same theme. I also linked to Wade Phillips’ press conference response saying that Dallas is just fine for the moment with its wide receiver corps. What gives?

There are a few things in play. One is the idea that the Cowboys main WR’s are aged and hobbled. Terrell Owens and Terry Glenn are both in their mid-30’s. Glenn is coming off a knee injury that effectively wiped-out his 2007 season and no one, including the Cowboys organization, is quite sure what his status for this year will be. Glenn is a good route-runner with good hands, but his bread-and-butter has always been his speed and his ability to separate from defenders. A severe knee injury to an older receiver brings up the very real issue that he may never be the same receiver again even if he does make it back on the field. Meanwhile, Terrell Owens, who it should be noted may be in his mid-30’s on a pure chronological basis, has the body of a much younger receiver and shows no signs of slowing down. But, and this is a big issue, when he went down with an ankle injury late in the season, the Cowboys offense began to sputter and his return in the playoff game against the Giants didn’t exactly fix the problem. It can be debated whether he was 100% but most observers would say he wasn’t and the rest of the receiving corps couldn’t make up for it.

When talking about the Cowboys passing game, the experts rarely point out one thing that plays a major role. The Cowboys #2 receiver is really TE Jason Witten. Even when Glenn was healthy they were probably 2a and 2b after T.O. Witten doesn't have to carry the load like some TE’s who were/are the #1 option on their teams like Tony Gonzalez or Antonio Gates, but he should be thought of in that class when evaluating the Cowboys passing offense.

Still, the Cowboys receiving corps is perceived as aging at the top with little backup potential and one injury away from real trouble. The truth is probably not that dire but there is some legitimate reason for concern.

The Breakdown:

Terrell Owens – His time in Dallas has been an unmitigated success and he’s proven that he’s among the elite receivers in this league. But he is creeping up their in age even though his mid-30’s appears to be like other receiver’s late-20’s. The Cowboys have a lot of contracts to settle with a lot of top players and T.O. is one of them, he finishes his original 3-year contract this year. Dallas will have to determine how long they want to re-sign him for and also work within the demands of money that T.O. and his agent drew Rosenhaus will surely ask for. Strictly in terms of football, Dallas most assuredly wants him back after this year, but the salary cap and the player’s age will shape the negotiations. He’s no lock for the future.

Terry Glenn – Just one huge question mark. Can he play again? Can he remain healthy if he gets back on the field? Will he be close to the same player he was if he does get back into the lineup? Dallas will be monitoring this situation very closely in the OTA’s and training camp. Glenn’s future in Dallas ranges from a return to the #2 WR spot to not even making on the 53-man roster because of lingering injury issues. Another WR where the future is uncertain, and unlike T.O., it’s uncertain for this season.

Patrick Crayton – An OK #2 option but a better #3 option. With Glenn’s injury he was pressed into service as the #2 (in pure WR terms, Witten actually fills that role) and during the biggest game of his life he failed not once, but twice, in a major way. Can he be counted on to handle the responsibility again this year?

Sam Hurd – A steady backup guy but doesn’t appear to have the potential to go much further.

Miles Austin – Has all the speed you’d want to break into the upper echelon of the receiving corps, yet seems better at drawing pass interference penalties instead of actually catching the ball.

Isaiah Stanback – We really don’t know what he can do since he was hampered by a foot injury last year and is trying to make the transition from QB to WR. A project with all the physical attributes but no one is really sure if he’ll be able to produce at the position in real games.

After that, you have some young veterans and some fresh-faced UDFA’s who will take their shot at muscling in on some playing time in training camp. So far, it looks like Danny Amendola has the early lead in making that happen.

So there’s the paradox. Essentially the same group of receivers returns that led the Cowboys offense to one of the best seasons in the history of the club. But they also proved the fragility of the situation through injury and inexperience rearing its head in the big playoff game last year. Unless Dallas makes a move for a veteran that can contribute in a meaningful way they will be rolling the dice and hoping to hit the big payoff. But with a little bad luck they could just as easily crap-out.

Comment 43 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

#2

It appears to me the #2 is going to have to come from with-in.

How can we afford to bring in an established WR?

by Wmillion on May 6, 2008 11:24 AM CDT reply actions  

I think they are fine at WR..

Idk call me crazy or call it faith but i really believe they are fine at WR. I think Austin or Stanback will break out this year and give the cowboys Offense what it needs….the need for speed

What the French?! Toast!

by thebigham on May 6, 2008 11:57 AM CDT reply actions  

I think so too

Crayton is a perfectly adequate #2 WR on this team, and Glenn would be better if he can play. What we need isn’t a ”#2” so much as just a deep threat, whether that guy lines up opposite TO or in the slot. Stanback sounds like he could be that guy; Austin could be that guy if he works on his hands big time. We also will have the ability to put Felix in the slot; he has the speed we’d need.

Crayton isn’t the greatest #2 in the NFL (not with duos like Harrison/Wayne, Chad/TJ, Fitz/Boldin), but he’s okay. He’s better than any WR some teams have on their entire roster. As a third option in the passing game, he’s solid, and is a good possession WR. If TO goes down, he’ll struggle to fill the #1 role, as we saw. But if you start playing that logic out at a lot of the starting positions (QB, TE, OT, FS, etc), we’d be in even bigger trouble.

Nobody in the draft was going to upgrade us at WR this year more than they upgraded us at other positions. There’s young talent, and it will get the job done.

by grapejoos on May 6, 2008 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Roy Williams.

Trade for Roy Williams. Win the Super Bowl now.

Texas slang in a Big Apple minute, by a friendly OED consultant. http://www.barrypopik.com

by barrypopik on May 6, 2008 12:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Crayton

bad #2, ok #3, good quality #4

.500 or bust!

Bad Vibes Kill Rallies!

"Well, we are one of the cheapest teams in Major League Baseball"
-Tom Hicks 4/8/2008

by Jayslick on May 6, 2008 12:16 PM CDT reply actions  

Patrick Crayton

50 catches, 697 yards, 13.9 yard average, 7 TD’s
Good #2, better #3

by Dave Halprin on May 6, 2008 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

if you wanna win a superbowl

he aint a good #2. he’s a good #2 on a crap team, on a superbowl contender he’s a #3 at best and a #4 on both teams that were superbowl teams last season.

.500 or bust!

Bad Vibes Kill Rallies!

"Well, we are one of the cheapest teams in Major League Baseball"
-Tom Hicks 4/8/2008

by Jayslick on May 6, 2008 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

He was the #3 on our team

Jason Witten was the #2, so he’s an OK #2 and an excellent #3 on a Super Bowl contender.

by Dave Halprin on May 6, 2008 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Crayton might have been #4 for NE, but GMen, no way

Crayton would easily be the 2nd best WR on the Giants.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on May 6, 2008 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Crayton is a damn good #3

You have TO and Witten, you want the guy to do better than 50 catches and 700 yds? Not going to happen on any team. He could play #2 WR on a lot of NFL teams. The only thing you said I agree with is that he’ll never be a #1 WR. As for the statement that he couldn’t be #4 on either SB team from last season, that is just ridiculous.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on May 6, 2008 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Should say "#3 on either SB team from last season"

post edit

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on May 6, 2008 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

And in the Playoffs....

Critical drop, quit on next to last offensive play. Big mouth who doesn’t have the game to match it.

by GhostofGaryHogeboom on May 6, 2008 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

love the name.......

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

"If you don’t take him off the field as a coach, he will just about die out there," Jerry Jones said. "That impacted my decision. It’s a Michael Irvin-type work ethic. That’s what we are talking about with Felix Jones."
- Owner/G.M of the Dallas Cowboys , Jerry Jones

by BoyzRback on May 6, 2008 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

In essance

it’s nitpicking to say we NEED another reciever…... IF the Miami Dolphins had T.O., Crayton, and the posibility of Terry Glenn returning to the lineup, the WR position on that team would not even be a question, as they have MANY other glaring needs….
I am 100% on board with the fact that our WRs are getting up there in age, are coming off injuries (Glenn), and that Crayton is NOT the BEST #2 WR in the league.. (like a Chand Johnson and T.J. Houch in Cinci).
Our needs were:
Running Back – addressed via draft
Corner Back – addressed via free agency and Draft
WR – not addressed (and might not be)
You can’t plug ALL the holes, but right now if you HAD to find a weakness in our personnell, you would easily say WR because age to our starters and seemingly NO obvious young player to develop.
I mean really, are we OK if Romo goes down? – probably not
are we OK if Newman goes down? – probably not
so it’s really just a matter of looking at our team, finding a weakness.. ANY weakness, and harping on that…

by stephena on May 6, 2008 12:25 PM CDT reply actions  

agreed

I will take our roster with another year of experience. This is Romo’s second year as the starter going in to the season. This offseason he can develop the rapport needed to develop the younger guys. Good QB’s make WR’s better- Romo has that type of talent. I just want him to work with the young guys and get there timing down. Everything else will fall in to place. You mentitioned TJ Hous, he was a 7th rd pick- it just takes time to develop.

Once Romo and Garrett Figure out what routes the young guys run best you will see huge improvements.

by Wmillion on May 6, 2008 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

good analysis Grizz

I think that sums our receiving corp quite nicely. It obviously would be nice to bring in an established veteran opposite T.O., but those guys cost money and draft picks.

I think Jerry and Wade are rolling the dice they can get one more year out of TG and re-sign T.O. for a few more years, until Stanback and the rest of the youngins develop.

Kirwan is usually a knowledgable football guy, so I was kind of surprised by his moronic comment that we could have drafted either Earl Bennett, Doucet or Manningham in the 2nd rd when none of those guys would have even sniffed the field or even made the team, let alone contribute in any significant way this season.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on May 6, 2008 12:57 PM CDT reply actions  

furthermore

...... add Roy Williams, Chad Johnson, or Randy Moss for that matter, to our roster, and some other ‘weakness’ would be found…. maybe out left tackle position… maybe our lack of full back experience… i don’t know.. but we the fans and the media would find some weakness…
last year the entire season the media harped on the Pats having ‘old’ linebackers and that by the end of the season that would come back to haunt them… other than that, they seemed invinceable… and in the end, it was NOT the ‘old’ linebackers that hurt them, it was their inability to stop the pass rush… so.. IF they had young linebackers, would the press have picked up on the need for better offensive linemen??!? who knows….

i.e. you only have so many people, and until your team is comprised of ALL pro bowlers and they NEVER get injured a weakness can always be found…

I bet we sit on the WRs we have now and next year go after Roy Williams when he is a FA or Chad Johnson after he sits out this year or plays VERY disgrunttled and the Bengals are forced to trade or cut him…

by stephena on May 6, 2008 1:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Question

If we sign Roy or Chad are we letting TO go? YOu are talking about having 40-50 million dollars locked up at WR position..

by Wmillion on May 6, 2008 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

When it's time

I think Roy Williams will be the guy.. next year… he is young plays like a seasoned vet and has a huge upside, he would pair nicely with T.O. Roy would be ‘on his way up’ T.O. because of age would be ‘on his way down’, but still a VERY dangerous WR.

I don’t know how we would pay them??? not my job, but i think if Roy, Jerry, and Stephen really wanted it, they would figure it out…

by stephena on May 6, 2008 1:18 PM CDT reply actions  

TE & RBs too

obviously I hope Glenn comes back and one or more of the younger guys has a breakout season like Wade seems to think they are capable of.

the other factor that you alluded to but is important as part of the overall passing game is the other positions who can catch. Bennett could be a real weapon, including in 2-TE sets and/or split out, and especially in the red zone where a 6’-6” player with jumping skills can get above the traffic. His blocking skills and overall athleticism combined with his more immediate potential contribution to the passing game made him a better value and than any of the WRs available. Add to that Felix Jones’ and Choice’s ability along with MB3 to catch out of the backfield and especially Jones’ ability to line up in the slot, and the possibility of having two of those RBs on the field at the same time, and that all adds up to a variety of targets for Romo that can help either take pressure off of Owens or take advantage of the coverage Owens draws. Just sayin’ Witten isn’t the only non-WR target that has to figured into the overall passing threat.

by scottmaui on May 6, 2008 1:21 PM CDT reply actions  

good point Scott

I get this feeling that Garrett will line up Felix the Cat out wide in many formations when MB3 is in the game, utilizing his speed opposite T.O. Really, thats all we need opposite T.O., speed to stretch the field, as we got plenty of receivers who can move the chains.

Sean Payton does the same thing with Bush and in all reality, Bush and Jones are the same players in terms of skill set.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on May 6, 2008 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

yes...

... and this was best utilized by Mike Martz with Marshall Faulk for the Rams.

I would love to see Red Ball utilize El Gato in the same manner. Talk about creating mismatches.

www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]

by silverblue5 on May 6, 2008 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree

El Gato could be a weapon in the passing game as well as the running game.

by Dave Halprin on May 6, 2008 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree

One more good option for the offense.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on May 6, 2008 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am still really upset that the cowboys didn’t go after Donte Stallworth.

by Zak on May 6, 2008 1:47 PM CDT reply actions  

You mean, the "Human Hamstring Pull?"

just kidding…

www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]

by silverblue5 on May 6, 2008 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I mean the guy that used to tear up the cowboys twice a year

by Zak on May 6, 2008 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know who you're talkin' 'bout

He was always healthy against us, but if you look at his career, you’ll see how many times he was injured with a hamstring pull or some other nagging injury.

And he tore up Dallas one year (twice when with Philly) and last year in one game against us (when with NE).

I’m fully aware of who you mean.

www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]

by silverblue5 on May 6, 2008 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe he just hates the Cowboys?

And we have to face him on opening day…

by sprprsnmn on May 6, 2008 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

How many yards can a third receiver really have?

Think for a second here. Witten had an all-time great season at TE with 1100+ yards receiving and he and TO combined for 2500 yards of receiving offense.

So think of great third options on offenses throughout NFL history, where the first two receiving options garnered 2500 yards (and 22 TDs) combined (there likely haven’t been many). How many of them had their third receiving option have significantly better numbers than 700 yards and 7 TDs. This isn’t a defense of Crayton – I have huge problems with him as a player – but the reason that WR isn’t an issue is because there simplyy aren’t that many more balls to go around. its a case of dimishing returns putting resources into that bucket.

If we had a fully functioning Glenn last year I highly doubt he could have also had a 1000 yard season with Owens and Wittens production not declining.

by Ailuridae on May 6, 2008 2:16 PM CDT reply actions  

I disagree

with a very good #2 WR, Romo could consistenly put up P Manning type numbers, 4500+ yds and 40+ TDs.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on May 6, 2008 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

actually

Romo’s numbers last year are very similar to Manning’s seasons. Peyton has had exactly one year of 4500+ yds and 40+ TDs, 2004. If Romo puts up numbers anything similar to last year, his numbers will be right around what Manning usually does.

by spyoung on May 6, 2008 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Stanback

Throw Stanback at the 2 and make it work.. Only way to get better is to play..

by Wmillion on May 6, 2008 4:08 PM CDT reply actions  

I hope so

I’m really interested to see how much further along he’s come in his development at WR.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on May 6, 2008 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think he'd stay

Hard to know what the Bengals do with their bungled WR situation, but I think (unless everyone gets happy this year) that they’ll find some way to get rid of Chad and keep TJ.

The good news is that there are several options on the horizon next offseason. I think any big WR signing might come at the expense of TO, because we definitely cannot afford to sign any big free agents without suffering very significant losses of current players, but maybe TO isn’t looking for a big payday this time around. We’ll see.

by grapejoos on May 6, 2008 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

TJ wants out too....and Cincy won't franchise him....

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

"If you don’t take him off the field as a coach, he will just about die out there," Jerry Jones said. "That impacted my decision. It’s a Michael Irvin-type work ethic. That’s what we are talking about with Felix Jones."
- Owner/G.M of the Dallas Cowboys , Jerry Jones

by BoyzRback on May 6, 2008 10:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

His situation is a little different

He wants out because he’s underpaid (and probably because he has to deal with Chad…I’m sure after being on his team in college too, he’s had enough). I think when push comes to shove, TJ will get a big new deal in Cincy and Chad will get shipped out. TJ is becoming the fan favorite there anyway, for good reason.

by grapejoos on May 7, 2008 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I just read comments from their coach...

already conceding the price will be too much for them to keep next season…..which is also one reason they drafted 3 WR’s….and picked up a few FA’s…..TJ will be outbid by every team looking for a WR…...Cincy…is and always will be the cheapest bastards in the league..

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

"If you don’t take him off the field as a coach, he will just about die out there," Jerry Jones said. "That impacted my decision. It’s a Michael Irvin-type work ethic. That’s what we are talking about with Felix Jones."
- Owner/G.M of the Dallas Cowboys , Jerry Jones

by BoyzRback on May 7, 2008 6:12 PM CDT reply actions  

rebuilding again

No chad, C. Henry, or TJ.

This team will be re-building again. They still have to figure out how to protect Carson, they let one of there best Linemen go last FA!!

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"

by Wmillion on May 8, 2008 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Woeful franchise

A good friend of mine was a Bengals fan all of his life. Last season, he couldn’t take it anymore and became a Giants fan (he lives in NYC and this was before the playoffs, in his defense). I don’t blame him. Palmer’s knee injury was a huge (and unfortunate) turning point there. Now they have a festering locker room cancer in Chad, a guy who is underpaid but at least a little classy (TJ), and a head coach who seems to have lost his grip. Things are gonna get ugly there.

by grapejoos on May 8, 2008 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jason_garrett_head_coach_small
Is Doug Free Overpaid?
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Hindsight Games Part 1: J.J. Watt
Jason_garrett_head_coach_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario
Largestssescape_color_small_small
Myth Busters: Dallas' Sad Pass Rush

Recent FanPosts

Small
Starters, dominant players, and BPA
Dez_bryant_small
What we need is for Jerrah to act like a GM and be proactive and fix the team with $17M under the cap resources
Small
It's Rabble's Fault
Small
Do what Philly did in 2011, only better
Dez_bryant_small
How The Giants GM Would Fix The Cowboys Overnight ... Good Read Jerrah!!!!
Zzzzwww_small
Twitter GM Mock

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui