...but who’s watching?..lol

If the team converts Henry to FS (which seems increasingly likely, at least in some situations), that would give Scandrick an opportunity to play as the 4th CB. Now, that would be a Quarter package essentially, but it would be nice to put that degree of athleticism on the field in prevent situations (Newman and Jones and Henry and Hamlin and Jenkins and Scandrick, oh my!). Of course, the other possibility of him seeing the field is if another CB gets injured.

I agree that it’s a big luxury to have such an upgraded CB corps – for one, it makes the Henry conversion an option. It remains to be seen how much trust the rookies can earn, but Jenkins figures to find his game sometime this season and Scandrick hopefully will around the same time.

a couple of tips per week. He’s VERY strict.

did not have Madden slobbering all over him for his entire career and thats what punches the hall of fames ticket. He will get in but with a hanging chad….

He just played so many damn games that he broke all the records, but it was at least partly due to the sheer volume, not necessarily overall averages or consistency, and of course one can’t ignore that when it comes to sheer volume, he leads in INTs as well. He looked really, really bad against us last year before he got injured, impatiently trying to force it down the field and making poor choices. Rodgers looked good in part because we didn’t game plan for him, but still, he did perform better than Favre.

Great Point, to say he wasn’t the most feared QB in the league at any point his career is bold statement considering he won the MVP 3 YEARS in a row, too me that means you were the best player in the league. Favre deserves a lot of the credit he receives. He put up great stats for years, did he throw more picks then you would like yes, but that is what happens when you are risk taker.
QB’s who I would take over Favre- Manning, Brady, Aikman, Montana, Marino, and Elway. I am just naming Qb’s I have seen with my own two eyes. So Favre is one of the ten QB’s in the last 25 years or so.

I think Aikman benefited from Emmitt, but it also stopped him from putting huge passing stats.

Aikman has 3 rings and is Hall of Famer, but he will never be considered a top 10 QB because he his job was to hand off to emmitt, and manage the game. Both Troy Aikman and Micheal Irvin could have put up profilic stats if we throw the ball more, but it wasn’t necessary.

Brett Favre threw the ball a lot more then Aikman on average, so Favre’s stats are better. Troy only had one season over 20 td’s, and only two good passing seasons. Year in and Year out, he put up medicore stats, not saying he wasn’t valuable, but his numbers just aren’t there.

What does Cowboy nation think? Favre or Aikman? I included a link for each of their stats.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/A/AikmTr00.htm

http://www.nfl.com/players/brettfavre/profile?id=FAV540222

That the QB who has started more consecutive games than any player ever, who holds the all-time marks in passing yards and TDs (and INTs) should not be in the HOF?

MVPs can be quibbled with, but if Favre doesn’t deserve to go in the HOF, no QB does.

You didn’t answer my question. Aikman or Favre?

Bradshaw man that guy gets the business from the fans. I never seen him play, so I can’t speak either way, but man he takes a beating..

I watched Bradshaw growing up in the ‘70s as a kid and all he did was just throw the ball up for grabs to Stallworth and Swann and they usually came down with it.

The guy had 2 HOF WRs, HOF OL, HOF RB and a defense littered with HOFers, all Bradshaw had to do was keep his INTs to a minimum as he wasn’t the most accurate passer that ever played.

So do you still think Favre doesn’t deserve to get in?

i was trying to say is bradys stats dont get anywhere near Mannings.. brady has the rings over manning thats it but Manning it still better. I used the bradshaw example to prove having 4 rings doesnt mean you are a great qb.