What Makes Motivation
I've been trying to figure out what makes for improved motivation come December. Is it having something to play for within the season still (like the Giants seeking the Wild Card and so it was push or bust)?
Is it the coaching staff seeing new things and coming up with motivation for tired players (and maybe bored players if there's not a lot to play for) like the Giant's defensive coordinator did by challenging his guys to cover and then feeding them with blitz's such that while other teams were coasting his started boasting sacks and pressures and INTs?
Seems conditioning is out of the question because we get the Thanksgiving 10 day break.... but then again is it? What do they do conditioning wise? Run, lift, playbook (conditioning for the mind), and execution of plays.... is any of that building towards December or needing to change so it can build in December? What do other teams do? And wouldn't it be wise of Jerry to do a study of the 10 most successful teams in the month of December, all their routines, treatments, strategies and regiments? Consistent winners win consistently for easy to document reasons and obviously we need to find a working pattern that works.
I see it the NFL keeps putting at least 2 divisional games in December for us so if we can't get up for Philly and the Skins and or the G-men then who can we get excited for.....and yet look what we have done! Would charting our Decembers help using all the factors you can think of? How about a slightly different approach, why don't we try some different things? ---Off the top of my head as a for instance- one big concern is wearing guys out before the Playoffs. Well that can be done mentally, physically, emotionally, and spiritually. What do you think, if we have a winning total lead like last year going into December why don't we decide to rotate Second String guys up to Starters during the Thanksgiving day game (and progressively use them for two games in December before putting in our top dogs again). It might get the First String guys to act as mentors; it might also irritate them and remind them that they Want to be the starters so come December they do still have something learn and to prove (in a hope to reinject heart and a need to will us over the top). --You know a sword is only sharpened by the friction of another hard surface. And really, something Has to change. It is bad enough to loose in December but to loose to Washington and Philly is horrible and even worst when you are dominated and made to look and feel bad like we have been for the last 3 or 4 years...and ever the question of WHY?
So what are your thoughts? Maybe our brainstorming will hit a note or strike a key and get pushed along to the big brass to look at and maybe, just maybe it will help our Cowboys to reverse that trend in crunch month, December. Cause I would love for people to start fearing playing Dallas at the end of the year!
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
0 recs |
10 comments
Comments
I've said before
and I continue to maintain that our conditioning always seems to break at the end of the season. Take the end of last season. Our once dominate offensive line was getting pushed around and run through. Our offense couldn’t finish plays, and our defense looked sloppy.
by Mandmeisterx on Aug 13, 2008 11:04 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Changes
I think having the Trio of talented backs will help with that.. If you noticed down the strech New England ran the ball very effectively, teams truly having to respect our run game, will be huge- More one on one coverage for WR/TE unit.
The Giants are another team that ran the ball effectively with 3 different backs all season. Running the football keeps the clock moving, and the defense fresh.
"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"
by Wmillion on Aug 13, 2008 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're overanalyzing it
In 2006, we still had a lot of holes to be filled and Romo was in his first year starting so the meltdown that year shouldn’t have been all that unexpected.
Last season, the team peaked against the Packers and felt that they had the entire NFC wrapped up after that game which lead to the fall off in December.
What happened last season should be plenty enough motivation not take any games for granted. I really don’t think we’ll see the annual December slide because of that.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Aug 13, 2008 12:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope your right
and of course only time will tell, but I think this year the team will be especially focused on trying to maintain their intensity and conditioning in December because they know what has happened in previous years. Of course we thought that might happen last year. But TO being out was one factor, and of course in the Skins game they didn’t have a goal any more, and chose to rest their starters. What I wonder is if they were to end up in the same position this year, having locked up the #1 seed in the NFC before the last game, would they do the same thing again, to ensure they keep their starters healthy, or would they go out and try to win that last game to keep their intensity up and try to maintain momentum going into the playoffs? The Giants chose the latter approach and look what happened. It may be oversimplifying it, as there are so many factors that go into team chemistry, intensity, conditioning and preparation, but it will be interesting to see what they do if they end up in the same situation.
by scottmaui on Aug 13, 2008 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
also don't forget
not only was T.O. hurt but Romo was nicked up as well.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Aug 13, 2008 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the Giants settled this one
You gotta go out and try to win. There is seemingly some unbelievable bad karma for resting starters for the playoffs. Until a team suffers a serious injury in week 17 subscribing to this, I think we’ll see more teams following the Giants’ approach. However, I will say that they had a pretty unique situation, in that their week 17 opponent was going for a perfect season, and playing them close gave the Giants a huge boost of confidence going into the postseason.
by grapejoos on Aug 13, 2008 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not to mention
we lost those playoffs games on virtually the last play & was able to battle back to put ourselves in scoring position, we had the ball last on both occassions, just did”nt execute!
I look at it as progression,wild card to NFC Champs to SB___
Third time is the Charm!
by bleedn blu on Aug 13, 2008 6:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Think about it
How great would it have been if we had just kicked the skins azzes all over the field last year instead of just laying down and letting them win? That would have been a huge confidence boost and I agree with grapejoos about bad karma for letting your starters rest.
The football gods do not bestow blessings on pussies.
by Billito on Aug 13, 2008 9:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
it is easy to say that in retrospect
but I don’t think one game or one season settles it that this is always the best philosophy. The Giants were fortunate to avoid injury and pull out their wins. But IF the Giants had gotten a big injury that hurt their playoff chances, or if one or two plays had gone differently (including perhaps the wrong call on Ware’s offsides) and the Boys had won, it could have been the Boys that went all the way, and we’d be saying the exact opposite. While there is something to the argument of maintaining your momentum for sure, there were many other factors at play and it easily could have turned out differently. One example does not prove the case forevermore. There will always be a risk/reward to both approaches that coaches have to balance to find the best way to protect their players while maintaining and building momentum and chemistry and confidence.
But given the freshness of this wound, if the Cowboys were to end up in the same situation I think they would seriously think about doing it differently this time.
by scottmaui on Aug 14, 2008 7:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















