The T.O. Tsunami Re-Run
Here it comes.
The T.O. tsunami.
The story almost writes itself.
There are certain things that are politically risky for a sportswriter or pundit to do. Challenge the strategy of Tony Dungy. Question the motives of LaDainian Tomlinson. That's stepping out on the ledge. But criticizing Owens is not one of these things. It's extremely easy to express disdain -- fake or real -- concerning Owens. It's not hard at all and requires almost no risk to do so.
After losses, I try not to watch much of ESPN because I know what's going to happen. I know that it's feast or famine. When we win there's hesitant and faint praise, but when we lose the criticism is harsh and unrelenting. Tom Jackson is almost always the harshest critic. Skip Brainless will no doubt offer his "I told you so" analysis along with a shocking and equally implausible theory -- perhaps Owens is trying to sabotage the season because he's become jealous of Romo's popularity. He'll offer no evidence, of course. Just a weightless theory he's paid handsomely to espouse. Keyshawn Johnson will join in on the chorus as will Cris Carter. The best thing about having Michael Irvin on ESPN was that there was somebody there who would stick up for Owens occasionally. He would also stick up for the Cowboys consistently. We saw what happened to him.
But my main point is still the same. This is a non-risk. Who hasn't criticized Owens? What risk is involved in criticizing him? Why should I respect this cowardice? Do you want to come out against World War II as well? Are you against the Dow Jones nosediving as well? Is this really the type of pack journalism that we deserve?
Of course, I'm not absolving Owens from his comments. Poor choice of words, IMO. Poor timing as well. Like Grizz said "STFU." Now and forever. Thank your lucky stars that Jerry Jones saved your career and gave you a chance to rehabilitate your image. Thank your lucky stars that you happened to meet a young, amicable, easy-going QB by the name of Tony Romo, who actually didn't brush you off but embraced you.
But, you know what, this comes with the package. I knew it. We all knew it. Owens is an emotional, brutally-honest, yet sensitive soul. He's going to say inappropriate things. Always. It's actually a miracle he's stopped putting his foot in his mouth as much as he used to. It's like having Allen Iverson on your team. Do you want the 30 points a game or not? Do you want the double-digit touchdowns a season or not? I do. I'll take it. It's annoying at times but guess what. Mild-mannered, respectful, humble receivers are a dime a dozen. I don't want them. I want the game-changer. Owens is that. But he comes with preconditions. Well-known preconditions.
But if the fans know that, doesn't the media? Of course they do. That's not the point. The point is it's a safe play. A story that's already been written. "T.O. causes trouble again." I could write that story blindfolded. "Owens says blah blah to blankety blank according to unidentified team sources." How much talent does it take to write that? And guess what. It feeds the beast and keeps the story going. Next thing you know major pundits from each sports network are weighing in. Then syndicated columnists from major dailies. Next comes sports columnists from smaller dailies each searching for slightly adjusted takes on the same story. T.O. back to his old tricks again. T.O. trying to sink team chemistry. Cowboys take chance on T.O. and it may be backfiring. It's like a similar guitar riff handed down from college jam band to college jam band until everyone is playing it.
I'm not asking for people to ignore Owens. I know he's a big story. I know he drives coverage. I'm not even asking people to ignore Owens when he makes dumb comments. That's fine. But it doesn't deserve a column by JJT or to be the focal point of a discussion after a major loss at home. It doesn't deserve to be hyped as one of the lead-in stories on ESPN. This is a story that has been written over and over and over again. There's nothing new here. He always complains when he doesn't get the ball. Always. Particularly when we don't win. Shoot he complains when he does get the ball. I know this. So I know you do.
Secondly, spare me the fake outrage. Who are you outraged for? Our team? Most of the media I've seen hates our team and this was long before T.O. became a part of it. Do you feel for Tony Romo? The same Romo you questioned as an unknown before last year and now call a choke-artist? I don't buy it. What about Wade Phillips? The same coach you call a lame duck and state brazenly has one year left to go before he's jettisoned? That's the biggest crock of $#-! I've heard in a while. Who's left? The fans? Let's be real. You could give a darn about the fans and particularly Cowboys fans. So exactly who are you outraged for? Please elaborate. I'd like names.
I guess I'm just tired of the worn-out narrative. Believe me, I'm always tired of Owens falling into this trap by giving them material to run with. Dude. Learn your lesson. You got the money, the fame and the top spot in our offense. Shut yer yap. But at the same time, I'm more frustrated in this half-a$$ed, faux-outrage that I have to deal with every week after a Cowboy loss. I shouldn't have to deal with it. I'm a pretty darn good consumer of sports news. I watch ESPN, Fox Sports and the overpriced NFL Network like my life depends on it. I rack up hits on ESPN.com, NFL.com, CNNsi.com, FOXSports.com and Profootballtalk.com everyday just to name a few sports websites. I scour newspapers for the latest sports news. I deserve more than this recycled story that will probably be played out week-to-week for the entire year and the rest of Owens' career. I deserve some actual work and actual analysis. And I'm usually not the guy to start spewing about what fans deserve because most times I feel like the only thing we deserve is an entertaining show and a team that attempts to win. But this is one thing I feel strongly about. I deserve more than this tired re-run. Repackage it and sell it to me another way. Cause this charade is stale.
1 recs |
36 comments
Comments
Nicely written
another sure sign this won’t be read by MSM.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Sep 30, 2008 4:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I shouldn’t have to deal with it.
Until TO is at home during the regular season sipping lemonade in his million dollar home watching people play football on TV, this story will never end. But this is compounded by the fact that he’s done this in every team he’s played for. There’s being, as you put it, “emotional, brutally-honest, yet sensitive soul” and there’s TO. Brutally honest is saying that you lost as a team and that WE made mistakes that need to be corrected. Saying that you didn’t get the ball enough and throwing your coaching staff and team under the bus are another story all together. A story should be written about that because he didn’t say that last year. Last year he talked about what WE did wrong, all of a sudden it’s what YOU did wrong.
That makes all the difference. I listened to his comments after the game, they weren’t twisted, he said that the he and the fans both new he wasn’t getting the ball. Don’t make this out like the MSM was putting words in his mouth, he said that all by himself, and he’s showing that same old TO angst, that’s not being an emotional and brutally honest player. It’s called throwing a tantrum because you lost.
by thwalls on Sep 30, 2008 6:15 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It was hardly a tantrum
and that’s the point. He said the offense runs better when they are getting him the ball in advantageous positions. And he’s right. Little quick outs and slants has not been working fo rthe team offensively. They haven’t been putting him in motion as much. The O line hasn’t allowed time for a longer play to develop. Lots of problems and I’m fine with ANYONE on that team being a catalyst for talking about adjustments.
Should he not say it to the media? Probably. But he didn’t rhyme Romo with Homo or say things about Garrett or Phillips that a lot of people on this blog did. So the media response is freakishly disproportionate to what Owens said.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Sep 30, 2008 6:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I absolutely agree with you.
Get the ball to the man who is going to make a play. That’s it. But if the man you go to, the catalyst, consistantly drops the ball when you go to him he can’t say that he’s not getting enough touches on the ball. And there were times when he was in single coverage and couldn’t make a play. I’m not going to say that he is a bad receiver, or a mediocre receiver, or even a “good” receiver – he’s a great receiver. But when you drop the ball more than 2-3 times in a game, you can’t say that you’re not being allowed ample opportunity to make a play.
That right there, the fact that he was given the ball and couldn’t do anything with it, combined with his ego, made his comments sound bad. Lets flip this…
If, lets say, Fitzgerald complained that his team wasn’t giving him enough touches to help them win and they were stagnate without him getting 8-15 touches in the game, where he CAUGHT all 5 passes he was thrown, that wouldn’t sound bad at all. He is a great receiver making the plays thrown his way, so saying that he needs more touches makes sense.
When you drop the ball in a game, that often, and have an ego that huge, you’re going to attract unwanted attention. Don’t get frustrated when the media calls him on it, because just like with the 49ers and the eagles, it came with the package.
by thwalls on Sep 30, 2008 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No doubt he can't drop balls and then copmplain about not getting his and have
much credibility. But he’s not doing anything really outrageous right now. We should all just take a breather and save our own tantrums for the time he does, if he ever does.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Sep 30, 2008 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1...
Journalistic integrity went out the window a LOOOOOOOOONG time ago. People take one line and skew the hell out of it. I want a receiver who says the offense is stagnate when he doesn’t get the ball. To say T.O is not a great guy to have lining up on our side is ridiculous. The fact is he does, and will continue to take 2 defenders with him where ever and he goes. He did learn from the best WR in the game and I pray that he passes that knowledge onto our young guys. As for one line, that’s fine. I expect it. As for the Philly fans and their trojan horse theory…STFU!!! You’re lame and as stale as the media is. Quit whining about poor Donovan and the suffering he went through 2+ years ago…
btw…what is MSM? I missed it somewhere along the way. Gracias.
by AikmanNailedMySis on Sep 30, 2008 7:33 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
one more explanation please...?
Can someone explain the dropping to a knee in the endzone penalty to me? T.O got flagged for the sprinter stance, but Trash, er…I mean Thrash didn’t get flagged for dropping to both knees like he won the Super Bowl? You can’t tell me he was praying…Why no flag? I think the obvious answer is zebras are Cowboys haters haha…
by AikmanNailedMySis on Sep 30, 2008 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can someone please tell me...
…what it was that T.O. said that has all the people up in arms? Is it just “I should have had the ball more”, or “I wasn’t involved enough”. I mean, is that it? or was there something else that I am missing.
I love me some T.O....I ain't skeerd!!!!!
by airtyme on Sep 30, 2008 8:22 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
And wouldn't...
the beef be between TO and Garrett, not TO and Romo…?
by Pete222 on Sep 30, 2008 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Owens did complain to Romo after the game about Romo’s bad passes.
~Texas Massacre 08~
by TheHeat on Sep 30, 2008 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Specifcally he said to Tony
“Can’t you only throw me the sticky balls?? I can’t hold onto those regular ones.”
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Sep 30, 2008 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did Romo Speak to the media??
I am not sure if i missed anything…but did romo talk to the media after the game?? It will be interesting to see how the media uses his responses to the game and show the rift in the team….I am thinking the cowboys especially Jerry need to start controlling player access to the media pretty closely…wasn’t TO unavailable to the media the last week….we all realise how the MSM has a anti-cowboys bias…i think we ought to restrict the availability of these comments to begin with…i am not sure whether the league can mandate any player to complusorily talk to the media…..
by thejanusman on Sep 30, 2008 8:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
great post
Three more thoughts:
1) TO’s statement wasn’t that he “didn’t get the ball enough in the GAME,” he was agreeing with a reporter’s statement/question that they “got him more involved in the 2nd half.” So, at worst, he was saying that he wasn’t getting the ball enough in the first half. That’s it.
2) Still, TO is 35, and he should know better. Count to ten when you get one of these questions, TO. Go to the Nuke Laloosh school of media relations… “Just wanna take ’em one game at a time….”
3) Yesterday, it was revealed that Plaxico Burress has been fined 40-50 times in the past few years, and has been openly insubordinate with Coughlin at times. Notice, this went on when the GIants were in a Super Bowl season! On the continuum of Locker Room problems, “high strong, give-me-the-damn-ball receiver” is about a 3, and an insubordinate star is about a 10.
4) If TO is hurting the team, it’s not because of his relatively anodyne news conference comments. He can’t “blow up this team,” because unlike in Philly, he would have no takers in a “TO vs. Tony” feud. If he’s hurting the team, it’s because he’s not rising to the challenge and beating Shawn Springs.
5) I think there IS something to TO’s complaints. If our offense is based upon a “read” that says “look away from TO when he’s doubled,” or “defeat press/double coverage by throwing a 6 yard comeback,” then it’s a kink. Guys like TO and Moss defeat double coverage when they don’t get looked at until after 4-5 seconds…let him defeat the bump and run across the field….and Dallas isn’t doing that. Beginning after the Packers game last year, teams are playing a “take TO away at all costs” defense against us, and I don’t think we’ve adjusted all that well to it.
by TimSchultz36 on Sep 30, 2008 8:32 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I completely disagree!!!
4) If TO is hurting the team, it’s not because of his relatively anodyne news conference comments. He can’t "blow up this team," because unlike in Philly, he would have no takers in a "TO vs. Tony" feud. If he’s hurting the team, it’s because he’s not rising to the challenge and beating Shawn Springs.
ESPN would be all over that story hahaha…Skip Bayless, Steven A. Smith, and Jay Mariotti would have a field day with that garbage. Not that it would be a good story, just that they would make it their biggest story
by AikmanNailedMySis on Sep 30, 2008 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Saw it coming...
Saw it coming and mentioned it several times during the Packers in game thread, but was attacked by people on the board saying to “pay more attention to the game.” Well, I pointed out that TO was sulking like his dog died because he only had 2 catches despite his team blowing out the packers. I knew it was coming, throwing the offense under the bus and now when it happens, the same people who attacked me, will say “it’s no big deal, he’s not saying anything.” Well, he is saying something, he’s making noise and it’s week four. I thought it was great that he stuck up for his QB after the playoff loss, but now after 2 weeks where he feels he wasn’t involved enough, we are seeing signs of the “OLD T.O.” Interesting take on Wade’s part, when asked about TO’s comments he deflected the question by saying, “we didn’t get marion the ball enough.”
by DieSlowKeyshawn on Sep 30, 2008 8:46 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I Agree
This is the beginning of the End.
~Texas Massacre 08~
by TheHeat on Sep 30, 2008 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
of all the TO talk? God I hope so.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Sep 30, 2008 6:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OHHHH!!... Carpenter is on First and Ten
With Skip Bayless…lol
Look up... get up...Don't ever, ever give up!!
by Boyzfan94 on Sep 30, 2008 9:09 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
TO's emotions
got the best of him. It was an emotional loss because he and every other Cowboy saw themselves as the team to beat, and they got beat. He is a true competitor and he sees himself as a playmaker. These dinks and dunks don’t work. Jason Garrett seems to have trouble getting TO the ball in the first half more often than not. It shouldn’t take until the 2nd half to get your #1 threat involved. This team wouldn’t be the same without TO. We knew who he was when we signed him, and he has helped transform our team. We also know that he’s capable of tearing a team a part.
Live by the sword, die by the sword.
by bryangene on Sep 30, 2008 10:14 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
London Free Press...really?!?
They stated:
So here was the most prominent and skilled of those three (talking about T.O, Pac, and Tank), whining he should have been involved in more than 20 of the 58 offensive plays the Cowboys ran against the Redskins.
He was implicating the coaching staff for not recognizing he must be the focal point of the offense.
This came from T.O saying:
“I’m a competitor and I want the ball.”
Wow. Talk about selective listening. The other articles only relevance comes from them crapping on T.O. for using the word “I” when talking about how he felt about him getting the ball. How else should he address what he thinks? The way Tuna addressed him? The media never ceases to amaze me…why did I major in journalism? Waste of money…
by AikmanNailedMySis on Sep 30, 2008 10:53 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The "London Free Press" my ass!
They need to be reminded that we’re the ones that kept them from mandatory German lessons.
Wharter
by Wharter on Sep 30, 2008 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
TO's contribution
14 points off 2 TD’s. Wants the ball to do what with it…. SCORE…..
Media doesn’t understand that athletes want to WIN and if they have ability ( which he certainly does), and sees that other parts of the game aren’t clicking ( Running Game, and Defense ) then HELL YEAH ……. Throw me the BALL.
He’s willing to draw coverage to free others up, and go for it alone if they aren’t open….
Sometimes , e.g. Austin touchdown, others get to score because of the coverage on him.
That’s what I want from our players , shows me that one is willing to help the rest, and if called on to do it alone are willing to succeed or fail in the name of winning.
by oldtimer on Sep 30, 2008 11:45 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Defense
It’s all about the defense. The Cowboys give up too many big plays. They won’t win a Super Bowl anytime soon unless they deal with this problem, they did little to address it this past off season, until that gets fixed the Boys will go no where, especially with T.O screwing with the chemistry of this team.
by TRFAN on Sep 30, 2008 11:55 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We don't have a TO problem
TO is an emotional player who wants to win a title and he wants to win it now, he’s going to complain and make some questionable comments to the media. Who in return are going to blow it out of proportion and make it look like he is destroying our team from the inside out. But no matter what he says, he is going to continue to battle and give it 110% in practice and on game day. I think the Cowboys players realize that and don’t consider him a threat to the cohesiveness of the team. He is an elite receiver who requires defenses to plan around him and who gives everyone else on offense a better chance to produce.
The real issue here is Jason Garrets offensive play calling and the lack of an identity our offense has. I know we want to get the ball to TO more and we tried to last game but we went about it all wrong. TO doesn’t need to be running 10 yard outs or be handed the ball in the backfield. TO is a deep threat who needs to be running posts, fly routes, deep drags, ect… He needs to be motioned more into and out of the slot creating miss matches. Leave the running to Marion, how you can only run him 8 times with the size and talent of our o-line just doesn’t make sense, and put Felix in the game on offense, why we don’t let him get at least 3 touches or more on offense a game is beyond comprehension for me. Let Witten continue to own the middle of the field and if your gonna bring a receiver around in a reverse why not miles austin or even stanback.
- if we can do that on offense we can’t be stopped, whether TO gets enough touches in a game wont be as big of a deal if were winning.
On defense, you would think with the coaching and the players on the field we would be one of the top 3 defenses in the league. But no we’re giving up an average of 22 pts, and over 200 passing yards. We need to get more consistent pressure which shouldn’t be a problem for us, even when rushing just 4, we need to bring more exotic blitz more often to keep the offense confused. We are to easy to read on defense. In the secondary we just have to play better, it’s hard to watch, T-new has been my favorite player on the boys’ for a while but he just hasn’t cut it lately, the secondary looks confused half the time out there, its embarrassing. Defense needs to stop assuming the offense is going to put up 30+ points and have some pride wanting to be an elite defense. Stop trying to make big plays on your own and just make sure you take care of your responsibilities from play to play and the big plays and turnovers will come.
Alright, I feel better.
" high and tight Martellus, high and tight."
by Staggolee87 on Sep 30, 2008 1:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
sometimes
being so far away from the action (Paris) is an advantage. At least i don’t get TO story in the French media. Anyway, I can see that media is the same everywhere. I don’t think that saying for example that Sam Hurd wants the ball more will attract readers! Media knows TO sells. Look at the Yahoo opening page. Tank Johnson has to be restrained after the game, but the title of the article links TO to the story, even though he wasn’t the one to be restrained.
Most sports media are like paparazzi or people media. They go after what sells and the Cowboys and TO are a hit for them.
by Helene on Sep 30, 2008 1:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not trying to interject politics here, but...
Sean Hannity says over and over, that with politics, journalism is dead. I truely believe that it’s not just with politics. Journalism is dead in sports as well.
Please don’t hold your breath Tuna waiting for some real journalism, we like you too much around here.
by mhuff13 on Sep 30, 2008 2:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
TO should know better
Whenever he says anything that can be spun as a “controversy brewing” type story, I blame him. The MSM will pounce on it whether it was an innocuous statement or not. If he hasn’t learned that lesson by now, he never will.
I really doubt he is saying or doing anything intentionally that would jeopardize the sweet deal he’s got going for him in Dallas. But he still needs to watch what he says or don’t say anything, and not give ammo to the media looking to tear him and the Cowboys down.
Don’t shoot the messengers, just ignore them. At least, that’s what works for me.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Sep 30, 2008 3:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
exactly
but he loves to talk to the media to much to shut his trap…
"If you see me up in the mountains with a lion, I ain't lyin
don't help me, help the mountain lion"
by Wmillion on Sep 30, 2008 5:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I say it was intentional
He knows there is a good thing in Dallas and he knows that the media attention is so over the top that anything he says will be magnified a million times. This puts pressure on everyone so he thinks they will appease him, ie “give him the damn ball.”
Immature? Yes. Effective? Let’s hope not or he will do it all year.
by Billito on Sep 30, 2008 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Media Unfairly Single Out TO
I agree that the media unfairly single out TO and this is a subject that I have addressed several times, including this post regarding the situation that you are discussing in this thread:
by David Friedman on Oct 7, 2008 5:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Somehow, the link did not show up in the above comment. Here it is:
http://besteversportstalk.blogspot.com/2008/09/monday-night-football-quick-hits_30.html
by David Friedman on Oct 7, 2008 5:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















