They're Rushing All Right: Dallas to Run More in '09, but How Much More?
Wade Phillips is quoted from a KTCK interview that he's looking for more rushing from his '09 team but sees a need for more efficient rushing:
"Overall, and you go into stats which obviously people use different ways, but our running game the last two years is around the 20th-best in the league. If we can shoot for the top 10 with that group I think it'll help us not only as far as moving the football in the running game, it'll also help us with the turnovers, cut down on those things, and the rush on our quarterback."
Phillips is right on both counts. The Cowboys run/pass ratio was 42:58 this year. That's a richer pass mix than '07, when Dallas ran 44% of the time. The trend in recent years has been for a pass first-run later strategy. I wrote a piece on this last January that I've pasting in part here. Consider than run/pass mixes of the top offenses last season:
The perfect ‘07 Pats lead a different era, where you pass to win. Look at the run-pass ratios of 2007’s top four playoff seeds:
- Patriots - 43/57
- Cowboys - 44/56
- Colts - 45/55
- Packers - 41/59
All throw the ball at least 55 percent of the time, and have ratios in line with last year’s Colts, who won the Super Bowl with a 44/56 run to pass ratio.
Now, compare those ratios to some of the biggest offensive juggernauts of the '80s and '90s:
- ‘89 49ers — 51/49
- ‘94 49ers — 49/51
- ‘95 Cowboys — 50/50
- ‘96 Packers — 46/54
- ‘98 Broncos — 52/48
Only the ‘96 Packers, with Brett Favre running Mike Holmgren’s offense, skewed more towards the pass. The ‘89 Joe Montana-led ‘Niners, the ‘94 Steve Young edition, the ‘95 Troy Aikman Cowboys and the ‘98 John Elway Broncos were all around 50/50 in their run/pass mix.
How do the remaining playoff contenders mix it up?
- Ravens: 58% run, 42% pass;
- Steelers: 46% run, 54% pass;
- Eagles: 41% run, 59% pass;
- Cardinals: 35% run, 65% pass;
It seems there are many ways to win, though the Cards stats are highly misleading. They've changed their character completely in the post season, going from a 2:1 pass/run ratio to a 52% run/48% pass blend in wins over the Falcons and Panthers.
Which brings us back to Dallas. I think the run ratio will jump much, much higher next year, but given the passing weapons at Dallas' disposal, I think a run percentage of 48% or 49% is more realistic than an attack resembling Baltimore's. Their ratio resembles those Wade's daddy Bum dictated for his '70 Oilers when Earl Campbell was his lone offensive superstar.
The last time Dallas had a run ratio higher than 50% was in 2005, when Drew Bledsoe was running the show. The fans that year accused Bill Parcells of playing too conservatively, of trying to win every game 17-14.
Wade won't win any converts trying that strategy.
0 recs |
161 comments
|
Comments
I like what I'm reading here...
This gives me hope. More runs, less bumps and bruises on Romo, less turnovers, more wins. Sounds good. Especially with the 3-headed monster we’ve got at running back: MBIII, Felix Jones, Tashard Choice.
All we need is some more beef on the OL and we can run much better.
by BishopWest on Jan 12, 2009 11:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I would contend in '05 we didn't have the talent or depth we have now at the
rb position. I think we could become a great running team if Garrett gives our Rb’s defined roles in our offense:
MB3:
short yardage; goal line; and 4th quarter closer
Bubble Butt:
1st and 2nd downs in the first three quarters
Choice:
3rd down back; relieving FeJo in the first three quarters; jack of all trades
by quincyyyyy on Jan 12, 2009 11:10 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
After we drafted FeJo Jerry was on some radio show and talked
admiringly of his nice bubble butt.
by quincyyyyy on Jan 12, 2009 11:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And he loved the way Troy looked in the shower (grin)
and some fans hope he’ll sell the team. ;)
by Rafael Vela on Jan 12, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
'Bubble Butt' is common coach talk. If you've been watching the...
NFL Combine for the last few years the term is heard quite a bit.
Family, Friends, Cowboys, Beer & BBQ. Life is good!
by CowboyMan on Jan 13, 2009 12:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
actually the majority of athletes
have bubble butts
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 14, 2009 7:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would like to see this ratio for our RB's per game
Barber: 12 carries
Bubble Butt: 12 carries
Choice: 8 carries
by quincyyyyy on Jan 12, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
hahaha
bubble butt
"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips
by MrMinority on Jan 12, 2009 2:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Wade's been reading BTB...
Hahaha
This is exactly what I’d like to see happen next season. With the group of RB’s that we have, there should be no reason we can’t end up in the top 10. O-line? This is all on you, make it happen.
If Dallas can make their opponents have to worry about the run in a big way it will go a long way toward helping Romo. Slow down the opposing pass rush, make play action more effective, and force the other team to drop that safety into the box.
A strong running game will help this offense return to a more effective unit…wouldn’t hurt if a certain someone to could make some less obvious play calls too
by TLCM on Jan 12, 2009 11:11 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This ratio
will always be out of kilter if we keep getting as many stupid penalties that force us into passing situations.
"We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality"
Ayn Rand
by Atlas will Shrug on Jan 12, 2009 11:11 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I hopeth
Because 3 out of the 4 things that can happen when you try to pass the ball are bad. I just hope that FJ’s and MB’s toes are good to go. I don’t trust toe injuries healing back to what they were before and they seem to linger past anything else people injure.
by dcfansinceiwasababy on Jan 12, 2009 11:15 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
excellent point
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on Jan 12, 2009 11:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well 2 of the three things that can happen when you run are bad
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 12, 2009 6:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
true..
You need balance.
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 12, 2009 6:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 12, 2009 6:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
know what they have in common?
Know what the Cardinals, Eagles, Steelers and Ravens all have in common? They all beat the Cowboys.
by Joey2zs on Jan 12, 2009 11:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I was just thinkin' about that last night...
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on Jan 12, 2009 11:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And Dallas beat the Eagles
and should have beaten Arizona and Pittsburgh.
They had the Ravens in position to beat them.
It’s nobody’s fault but their own.
by Rafael Vela on Jan 12, 2009 11:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
so true, so true
Imagine if our Boyz had put Zona, Pitt, and Balt away and our record was 12-4 instead of 9-7.
If, if, if…
woulda, coulda, shoulda…
sux.
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on Jan 12, 2009 11:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
how about Philly vs Arizona being two 9 win teams
I’m pulling for the Eagles cause I’d like to see tenacity, consistency win.
by AustonianAggie on Jan 12, 2009 1:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
BLASPHEMY!!!!!!
I want their trophy case to stay nice and empty like it should be!
by TLCM on Jan 12, 2009 2:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no way
Don’t root for the Eagles, dude. That makes me really unhappy and hurts my head a little bit. i HATE the Eagles.
by Joey2zs on Jan 12, 2009 8:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+10000000
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 12, 2009 9:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+quadrillion octillion
Just trying to make a point …
Stop the Madness - Enshrine Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com
by Raul Villaronga on Jan 12, 2009 9:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Addition by Subtraction
Tex is puzzled… why hasn’t Brian Stewart, the most unqualified coordinator in the National Football league, been let go yet? Following Read and Adam Jones, BStew’s dismissal was the third “no brainer” move of the off-season. Capers will be gone by week’s end and the status quo on defense isn’t acceptable. Fire Brian Stewart.
by Montecito Tex on Jan 12, 2009 11:17 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I feel dirty saying it but...
I actually agree with Tex on this one…
Stewart probably should be let go, probably won’t happen since he’s Wade’s lovechild, but, would moving Herring to DC be a way to keep him here? If Ware’s success this season is related to Herring, I’d like to see him stick around.
by TLCM on Jan 12, 2009 11:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Promote Herring,
and further demote Brian Stewart. Is Hudson Houck still around?
by Joey2zs on Jan 12, 2009 11:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's an empty shell game
Herring might leave because he gets to run an offense.
Changing his title does nothing.
Wade is calling the defense. He developed it. Stewart is an appendix,
so whacking him does nothing except give Tex warm and fuzzies.
by Rafael Vela on Jan 12, 2009 11:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Haha
Well in that case nevermind….
I don’t need to think about Tex getting his warm and fuzzies…ew
by TLCM on Jan 12, 2009 11:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously
Wade runs the D….just looking for a way to cut some dead weight and keep what looks like a good position coach
by TLCM on Jan 12, 2009 11:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Herring won't stay if he gets the DC title and nothing else.
by Rafael Vela on Jan 12, 2009 11:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You don't think
If his heart is to be a NFL coach he would stay if given the DC title? My thinking is if it is about the NFL the title matters, if it is about responsibility to his already gone.
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 12, 2009 12:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh ...
… does nothing except give Tex warm and fuzzies.
Well, there goes the ole appetite …
Stop the Madness - Enshrine Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com
by Raul Villaronga on Jan 12, 2009 3:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
Tex is puzzled… why hasn’t Brian Stewart, the most unqualified coordinator in the National Football league, been let go yet?
Maybe BStew is in Cabo working on his pear-shaped physique by drinking margaritas and chasing divorcee bimbos?
Stop the Madness - Enshrine Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com
by Raul Villaronga on Jan 12, 2009 3:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL!!!
The pear shaped physique nonsense is really puzzling as Romo could probably be considered very thin for a pro qb. Never understood that one.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 12, 2009 3:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He doesn't look like he weighs 225, does he?
I wonder if he still does, or if he ever did. Roethlisberger is 6’5", 240 and he appears more a lot more stocky than Romo at 6’2", 225. But if those are the right weights, Romo is thicker for his height than Big Ben. I think Aikman was listed at 6’4", 225, so Romo would be stockier than him, too.
I bet he’s closer to 200.
by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 12, 2009 6:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 12, 2009 6:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I hear you Tex.
If nobody else wants to give you credit for calling for his head months ago I certainly will.
Romo really does suck. Jerry really needs to hire a GM. Fuck your new stadium Jerry.
by Captain Comeback on Jan 12, 2009 3:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
For once
You are saying something intelligent and that I agree with T E X
by dcfansinceiwasababy on Jan 12, 2009 11:19 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
2005 Parcells
problem with Parcells in 2005 was that when you expect to win games 13-10 / 17-14 you need to have a reliable kicker….and we just didn’t
by McLovin9 on Jan 12, 2009 11:23 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
McLovin
If next year’s team played like that you know the first time the team lost people
would be screaming for heads to roll because the team is wasting all the passing
talent at its disposal.
And yes, the lack of a kicker was Parcells’ fault. It’s negligence if you don’t have a good
kicker.
And Vanderjagt goes around his neck.
by Rafael Vela on Jan 12, 2009 11:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And the irony of it all was...
… that Big Bill was so meticulous about having great special teams, yet the kickers we had under him always sucked.
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on Jan 12, 2009 11:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bill's special teams were awful here
Look at ’06 alone:
allowed a 100 yard TD return to Washington.
Allowed three long punt returns in the Lions loss;
and let their final FG attempt get blocked, which gave Washington the win after Kosier’s facemask penalty.
It wasn’t just on the kickers. Joe DeCamillis can do the team a big favor by getting those special teams in shape.
But it takes smarter players, unlike Pat (three facemask penalties before Halloween) Watkins. Kevin Burnett is no genius either. I remember Bruce Dehaven getting exasperated with him in Oxnard one day and asking him to add two plus two and then to count to five before a ST drill. And I don’t think he was completely joking.
by Rafael Vela on Jan 12, 2009 11:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow. After hearing about how dumb our players are...
… I think I’m finally understanding the importance of drafting talented, character, AND smart guys!!!
Thanks for the knowledge, Raf!!!!!!!
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on Jan 12, 2009 11:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I though Jones signed Vanderjagt
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
by Seanrude on Jan 12, 2009 12:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Parcells wanted him though
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 12, 2009 6:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There isn't much passing talent.
Witten, that’s it. Owens is losing a bit each year now. Williams is a poor man’s mid 30’s Owens. Miles and Crayton, JAGs.
by edubz on Jan 12, 2009 10:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
-1
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 12, 2009 11:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The other problem was
JuJo was are main back and our offensive line was even worse than it is now.
by quincyyyyy on Jan 12, 2009 11:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I also feel like a good running game will help our defense
there were many games last year when it seemed like our defense was just getting worn down.
by quincyyyyy on Jan 12, 2009 11:28 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Oh you mean...
Like when we’d come out and run 3 pass plays in a row and go 3 and out for half a game?
+1
by TLCM on Jan 12, 2009 11:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Cards
Won by studying film, finding holes in their opponents Defense/Offense and exploiting it. Just like they found holes in the Dallas Defense/Offense and exploited them. Dallas Coaches/Players are sooooo confident in thier abilities that they feel they can just line up and no one stop them. Until they get out of that mindset we will continue to disapoint.
by GunsUp on Jan 12, 2009 11:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
The percentage of runs to pass can only be 50-50 if....
we have RBs that can consistently pick up 3rd and 1,2,3,4s. For this to work, though, we need to get positive yards on 1st and 2nd down. If we have to pass on 80% of 3rd and 3,4,5,6 etc., there is no way to reach 50% in runs. too many times this past year we got zero passing on 1st down, stuffed on 2nd down runs, and disaster on 3rd down. Romo completely lost his touch for 3rd and long situations. Something he was once great at.
Family, Friends, Cowboys, Beer & BBQ. Life is good!
by CowboyMan on Jan 12, 2009 12:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don't think
he lost his touch so much, as the opposition knew what was coming. Ray Lewis and others stated they knew what the Cowboys were going to do on every play. As good as our players are, they can not win in that situation, and that goes directly to coaching/coordination.
by GunsUp on Jan 12, 2009 12:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Protection...
Plays a huge roll in that as well
by TLCM on Jan 12, 2009 12:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 12, 2009 6:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's why Tashard Choice needs to play more
Dude almost always made positive yards on hs carries. I suspect Felix Jones did as well, although both are small sample sizes.
On the other hand, Barber seemd to get dropped for a loss quite a bit in 2008, even before his toe injury. I suspect that’s the nature of the beast, as he always fights for yards and sometimes that ends up with him losing yardage.
Just an observation…
by DavidH22 on Jan 12, 2009 2:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As you said its a small ample size for Dash and Tash
I still think MB3 should be the focal point of our running offense
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 12, 2009 6:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
*Sample size
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 12, 2009 9:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In other news...
NFL Network has a scroll running at the bottom of the screen saying the Colts are holding a presser this afternoon and Tony Dungy is expected to retire
by TLCM on Jan 12, 2009 12:26 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Man
Dungy was the man. Interesting to see where they go from here..
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 12, 2009 12:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention...
Dungy was one of the true class acts in the NFL. Just a good guy all around…
I was just joking with a friend that Indy should just get a killer DC and let Peyton run the show hahaha
by TLCM on Jan 12, 2009 12:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They've already announced that
Jim Caldwell will be promoted to HC.
He interviewed in Dallas two years ago, you might recall.
by Rafael Vela on Jan 12, 2009 1:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They'll probably keep their whole staff in place
and keep rolling. Tom Moore is a kick ass OC;
Howard Mudd is a great OL coach;
There’s no need to rip it up and start over there.
by Rafael Vela on Jan 12, 2009 1:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dungy
well i will probably get ripped for saying this and i even feel bad about saying it because i have zero doubt that Dungy is a good coach and probably even a better person but his teams consistently underperformed in the playoffs and were 1 and done….TB won the year after Dungy left and you ask yourself is that a coincidence?? i mean, yeah – they won a superbowl and the Pats were really good at the time as well….but for a team that good and that put up that many 12/13 win seasons they sure seemed to fizzle in the playoffs with the exception of the 2006 team that went on and played a Grossman-QB’d Bears team
by McLovin9 on Jan 12, 2009 1:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
McLovin
Look at Tom Landry’s career record sometime.
You’ve just described it.
by Rafael Vela on Jan 12, 2009 1:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dungy
Was a great coach and a great person.. He had his faults like every coach. He had a trend of being one in done in the playoffs. Defense wins championships. I think Indy needs to focus on improving the D.
We talk about TO, Romo, witten, Roy Williams, but we need to talk about our D. D’s wins championships.. Philly, Balitmore, Pitt-top 3 D’s and AZ has been spectacular stopping the run this post-season. M. Turner #2 RB in the league for rushing yards, D. Williams lead the league in TD’s and top 5 in yards..
Tex posted it earlier, but B Stew, needs to go. We need all of the quality coaches on D we can find.
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 12, 2009 3:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
It seems like Romo, Garrett and T.O. as well as the OL are getting all the heat, but our defense, except for a few games this season, really underachieved.
They need to play much better if we expect to make the playoffs and advance.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 12, 2009 3:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, and the lazy-arse, idiotic, moronic, asinine MSM...
… stupidly harped on Romo in that Eagles loss, when our D was the ones giving up big play after big play. We were already getting destroyed when Romo began turning the ball over, and it was only because he was forced to attempt high-risk plays in order to try and cut the lead.
Unfortunately, his and the Barberian’s turnovers led to long Philly defensive TD returns.
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on Jan 12, 2009 3:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
maybe Romo wouldn’t feel the need to make something out of nothing and gamble on high risk plays if he had a defense he could count on.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 12, 2009 3:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
so you’re saying that those 2 vintage Romo ducks in the first half of the Baltimore game were because he couldn’t trust his defence and was trying to make something out of nothing?? puhlease
by McLovin9 on Jan 12, 2009 3:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It was just 17-3
when Romo threw that horrible interception intended for Roy Williams. He had puh-lenty of turnovers this year when the games were close.
by DavidH22 on Jan 12, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you think 17-3 is a close game?
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 12, 2009 3:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i actually do think that being down by 2 scores in the 2nd quarter is still a close game…and dont just use the philly game – the guy was doing it all year – baltimore game was a brutal example….how many picks did he throw in the endzone this year??
by McLovin9 on Jan 12, 2009 4:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes I think 17-3 and having the ball around midefield is manageable
And yes McLovin, Romo had plenty of turnovers when the game was even closer than two scores, in the red zone or within FG range.
Terry, you won’t find a bigger Romosexual than me. But there’s room for criticism of his December performance, especially.
by DavidH22 on Jan 12, 2009 7:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
with the way the defense was playing
I can understand the offense feeling like they HAD to score, right then. I felt like that too.
I agree on the endzone interceptions, they are absolutely inexcusable. Some of them were forced too.
by foyesboys on Jan 12, 2009 8:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe 1 or 2 that i can think of
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 13, 2009 10:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Philly's D
Philly D-held MInn 14 and NYG-11 I guarntee we could beat both of those teams if our D held them to those point totals..
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 12, 2009 3:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I knew about Caldwell
but, I am intersted to see what effect it really has. I guess Pittsburgh didn’t have a huge drop off after Cowher left..
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 12, 2009 1:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I predict no effect
The OC, and O-line coach have been in place forever, and their offense is the strength of the team.
Much like PIT has had LeBeau running their defense forever, the strength of that team.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Jan 12, 2009 2:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They Cowboys need to be more balanced
but with Garrett as OC, they’ll always pass more, I’m thinking a good pass/run ratio would be 55/45.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 12, 2009 12:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Balance
depends on healthy players. In order to up the running plays, we will need our RBs and OL functional for the season.
Our “can-do” has to keep up with our “want-to.”
Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.
by OskieOskie on Jan 12, 2009 1:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Won't happen Terry...
If this team can just get around 50/50 it will be all they need…
Balance is the key
by TLCM on Jan 12, 2009 12:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
50/50 won't happen with Garrett as OC
Closest you’re going to get is 55/45.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 12, 2009 1:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You need to be leading to keep running
Hard to commit to run first if you aren’t leading.
by I_miss_Switzer on Jan 12, 2009 1:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
that is not true at all
unless you are down by a lot there is no need to veer away from the run.
by quincyyyyy on Jan 12, 2009 1:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
Sticking to the run is a necessity.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Jan 12, 2009 2:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
More accurately
you run more when you are leading – that is generally how you try to close out games.
by I_miss_Switzer on Jan 12, 2009 5:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Scrip Club
Anybody see the Pacman piece?
by Joey2zs on Jan 12, 2009 1:31 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I ask because...
…where’s the hatchet piece on Marvin Harrisson shooting someone?
by Joey2zs on Jan 12, 2009 1:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Facts About BStew
In 2003, as assistant defensive backs coach for the Houston Texans, Brian Stewart’s group ranked 31st in the league in pass defense.
In the next two years, as defensive backs coach for the San Diego Chargers, BStew presided over the leagues 31st and 28th ranked pass defense.
And then, with a proven track record of failure, the beleaguered Brian Stewart was named Defensive Coordinator of America’s team. Tex doesn’t get it.
Even if he is just a male secretary, and a Coordinator in name only, Brian Stewart is unqualified to lead this defense. He looks like a deer-in-the-headlights on the sidelines and his units have underachieved, again. The Chargers didn’t just strip Ted Cottrell of his play calling duties, the wacked him in full… addition by subtraction. The same must take place in Dallas. Fire Brian Stewart.
by Montecito Tex on Jan 12, 2009 1:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Can't argue with that.
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
by gee-roj on Jan 12, 2009 2:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Psssst...Tex.
We all are with you on this point. We all agree that Stewart is dead weight. No need to keep re-hashing the same thing over and over.
by Ridgelake on Jan 12, 2009 3:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Stew has to go..
to many good coaches, to leave him in place
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 12, 2009 3:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, if we had a traveling secretary position...
… George Costanza would even have a better track record than Stewart. LOL!!!
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on Jan 12, 2009 3:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
BStew for VO, not DC
I have to give Tex his props, he was calling for BStews removal before anybody. I have to say, Tex is/was right.
It’s Wade’s scheme, Wade calls the plays..BStew is a vestigial organ, an appendix.
A vestigial organ had some function at one point, but now serves no purpose, other than a possble infection site, warranting emergency surgery.
Beyond the financial waste of Jerry’s money, wouldn’t the team itself be better if we had a functioning DC instead of a VO?
If we could get a knowledgeable 3-4 guy, he might be able to add some new wrinkles to Wade’s D, maybe free Wade up to focus on other team issues, maybe get a defense that can take us to the next level.
We know our O stumbled this year, but it was our D that cost us the playoffs. The D was showing improvement, but they failed us when we needed them most. Do we need some new players? Yes. If we had a full time DC he just might be able to squeeze some extra performance out of the ones we have.
Defense wins championships. If the Cowboys want to win, this is an obvious step that has to be taken.
Wade, get an appendectomy.
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams
by Jim Vance on Jan 12, 2009 4:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
blow it all up
well if BStew has got to go – and assuming Garrett gets HC job then you may as well blow the whole thing up because no OC/DC worth his salt is going to come in under this lame duck HC only to know he is likely to get canned in 2010….i’m seriously concerned that 2009 ends up being a writeoff before it even starts…it makes no sense to keep a HC that really is only being kept around to run the defence but you cannot demote him because it would never fly (for him or the team)….if Garrett and BStew go then you may as well send the marshmallow packing as well and get this thing rolling now as opposed to waiting to romance Cowher in 2010…this team is only going to be a viable superbowl contender for another season or two…and that is only assuming Romo can focus on football as opposed to posing in People magazine with his bimbo
by McLovin9 on Jan 12, 2009 4:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand
Why would Wade be a lame duck if Garrett is gone? Wouldn’t that solidify his role, rather than weaken it?
Wouldn’t assistant coaches want to come in if Wade is a lame duck, anyway? They would be more likely to get promoted if there is a vacancy ahead of them.
Garrett was foisted upon Wade by Jerry. Wouldn’t his absence allow Wade greater freedom?
by Joey2zs on Jan 12, 2009 5:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well - i am saying that
Phillips is a lame duck because i am going out on a limb and saying that this group of players hasn’t responded to him and that his dedication to ‘getting tough’ for 2009 just isn’t going to work….and everyone in the media (and the players) know it….Phillips being a lame duck really isn’t related to Garrett leaving…..any HC coming in is likely going to want to hire his own OC/DC…..Phillips was just happy to get another shot at a HC position and would have taken the job under almost any circumstances….so if there are OC/DC jobs out there you are not going to take one where the writing is on the wall that there is a pretty good chance the HC is out of there after the season
by McLovin9 on Jan 12, 2009 5:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Just to play Point-Counterpoint ...
… because, well, it’s fun.
In 2003, as assistant defensive backs coach for the Houston Texans, Brian Stewart’s group ranked 31st in the league in pass defense.
Uh … Houston was an EXPANSION team in 2002. They at least progressed from #32 in 2002 to #31 in 2003 …
In the next two years, as defensive backs coach for the San Diego Chargers, BStew presided over the leagues 31st and 28th ranked pass defense.
But he was with them THREE years, and they ended up 13th in 2006!
In the season prior to his arrival in San Diego (2003), the Chargers allowed 36 touchdown passes. In Stewart’s first two seasons on the job (2004 and 2005), the Chargers allowed a combined total of 38 opponents’ scoring passes.
Let’s look at 2003 (before Stewart) and the 3 years with Stewart:
2003: 27 overall, 21 passing, 25 rushing
2004: 18 overall, 31 passing, 3 rushing
2005: 13 overall, 28 passing, 1 rushing
2006: 10 overall, 13 passing, 7 rushing
A significant improvement in the rush defense because of the big seasons that Brees and Tonlinson had. That caused teams to pass more often in comeback attempts:
2003: 524 attempts, 322 completed (61.5%)
2004: 607 attempts, 372 completed (61.3%)
2005: 567 attempts, 338 completed (59.6%)
2006: 538 attempts, 307 completed (57.1%)
Then in 2006, a dramatic improvement as Jammer (4 picks), Florence (3 picks) and safety Hart (3 picks). Their coverage helped the San Diego defense accumulate a league high 61 sacks.
Note that the completion percentage declined each year, despite more attempts (pre-2006).
TAG – you’re it! 8^P
Stop the Madness - Enshrine Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com
by Raul Villaronga on Jan 12, 2009 5:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Jane, you ignorant....
Ah, an additional perspective… good numbers and good analysis.
I used to be the smartest kid in 6th grade. I’m not in the 6th grade anymore. Are you postulating that this year, BStews 3rd year as VO, will be his breakout year?
Past performance with other teams aside, what has Stewart brought to this club in the last two years?
I’m not challenging your numbers or your belief that BStew might surprise us, has he been doing more behind the scenes than we know about?
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams
by Jim Vance on Jan 12, 2009 6:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nah ...
I’m just countering statistics with … statistics.
Stats are like a-holes … everyone’s got one and you can always make the other one sound like it stinks…
Oh … I’m Chevy Chase … and you’re not.
Stop the Madness - Enshrine Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com
by Raul Villaronga on Jan 12, 2009 7:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's another anecdote to support more balance
The NFL passing leader has NEVER, repeat NEVER, won the SuperBowl.
Brady probably came the closest – they were a huge favourite – but couldn’t get it done.
Rushing leader, defensiver leaders, even special teams leaders have won the SB – but never the passing leader. Over 40 SuperBowls I think that simple stat says something.
You have to be able to run in the playoffs, or eventually a good D will force you into mistakes and knock you off.
by BoyfromOz on Jan 12, 2009 2:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Well the passing leader may never have won.
But plenty of teams have championships throwing the ball. Montana certainly won a few super bowls throwing the ball in the post season.
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
by gee-roj on Jan 12, 2009 2:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
thats overrated
The passing leader is also likely to be paired with a defense that is not great, cause otherwise there’d be no need to pass so much. Brady in 07 is the odd one out. Since they ran up the score so much
Also, i think you really can only look at the last 8 or so years when talking about whats needed to win a superbowl, the FA era. In the playoffs, the rams, pats and steelers in 05 had great passing attacks that put points on the board quickly. The Eagles have always passed the ball a lot, and they’ve made 5 championship games in 8 years.
Its definitely not impossible to win with a passing led offense. In fact, looking at the list of super bowl contneders, more of them have a great passing attack than great running game. But you generally do need a great defense too.
by foyesboys on Jan 12, 2009 2:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i guess its more the timing than the %s
because we are a pass first run later team, in games were losing, we don’t run nearly enough. When we have leads, i like the way the plays are called.
by foyesboys on Jan 12, 2009 2:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
in the 49ers game
we were up like 30-6 or something like that
we became completely inept, never ran and kept passing and going 3 and out
while san fran scored two garbage td’s
garrett was good in 07 for putting the nail in the coffin and he did do that a bit this year in the seahawks game but still it was the seahawks
we definitely need to run more..it takes alot of pressure off romo, we have 3 starting quality backs with mb3, felix, and choice
i like choice alot and i think he should be more of a constant while sprinkling in barber and felix
maybe even putting 2 or all of them on the field at the same time like baltimore does
then the play action becomes explosive and we already have pro bowl qb in romo to pass the ball when need be
"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips
by MrMinority on Jan 12, 2009 2:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
we ran the ball in the 4th in the giants and redskins games too
you’re right about that 49ers game though.
i agree that we need to run more, but i’m thinking more like 54-46, where we run more when we’re down and the games tight.
The big issue with running the ball though has been that our line doesn’t block – when you run on first down, and get anywhere from 2 to negative 2 yards, and then get a stupid penalty on 2nd down, you’re left with a long yardage situation.
by foyesboys on Jan 12, 2009 3:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yea choice and barber excelled in those two games
but aside from that we’ve never had a good rushing game
barber had only 2 100 yd games and coincidently they were both when kosier was in (green bay and washington)
and yea the penalties are awful but we had those in 07 yet the line gave romo time or atleast just enough time to make a play
this year instead of trying to get all 20 yards back with bad OL play we should get 8 or 10 to make 3rd down a bit easier
thats why the giants game was great because the screens to choice were working to perfection
that was garrett’s best game all season, he adjusted well and called good plays
romo played great as well as choice and the defense
"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips
by MrMinority on Jan 12, 2009 3:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This team will be much better off running more
Helps Romo, and the defense. I hope Houck regains his touch and the line can maintain consistency next season. They are certainly built for the run and not the pass as much.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Jan 12, 2009 2:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
It's being reported that,
Garrett is the #1 candidate for the St Louis Rams head coach position
by Joey2zs on Jan 12, 2009 2:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Why?
The Rams defense dominated us. Why would they want to hire someone whose butt they kicked?
by GunsUp on Jan 12, 2009 2:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Honestlly though...
… with da exception of the opening drive of that Rams’ game, backup QB-Limp Johnson couldn’t provide any potency for our offense that game.
If we had Romo, we win that game.
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on Jan 12, 2009 3:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Did he interview?
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 12, 2009 3:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
a local St Louis paper
but i missed the name of the paper. I heard this on the Chris Myers’ nationally syndicated radio show.
by Joey2zs on Jan 12, 2009 2:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Check out da link below
Here’s a source.
"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson
www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]
by silverblue5 on Jan 12, 2009 3:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
After thinking about it
I think the Det job is better then the STL job.
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 12, 2009 3:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How?
He’ll have a quality veteran QB in Bulger, who won’t have to start from square one as a rookie will. The Rams do have some building blocks in Jackson, Donnie Avery, Chris Long and Adam Carriker.
They’ll need to rebuild their o-line before they bounce back, but they’re a better organziation than Detroit.
by Rafael Vela on Jan 12, 2009 5:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
because
I don’t think Bulger is very good.
I like Kevin Smith, Calvin Johnson, Cherlis, Ernie Simms, Bodden and the 1st,20th, and 33rd pick in the draft..
I think Chris Long is average and Adam Carriker is below average. You have a ton of money tied up in Bulger who in my opionon is in the bottom half for starting QB’s.
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 12, 2009 6:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it will be tough
for Garrett to beat out those candidates.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 12, 2009 3:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
On the run ratio
Marion didn’t have a very good ypc…
If we run more it won’t go up all things being equal.
by Mojoness on Jan 12, 2009 4:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
It would have been above 4.0 if we didn't try to play him injured
by quincyyyyy on Jan 12, 2009 4:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not above 4.0
around 3.9….not to be too technical. Which btw is still about a full yard lower than the average of his last two seasons. And don’t forget that Barber actually started off kind of fast, yards per carry-wise. He steadily declined throughout the year, the second Washington game aside.
by DavidH22 on Jan 12, 2009 7:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As I said- All things being equal...
Besides… I think his ypc was as much about poor/average offensive line performance as anything.
by Mojoness on Jan 12, 2009 7:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought it was the most ridiculous coaching decision of the season
why we started barber and played him full time when we had drafted two capable guys is beyond me. Barber is a closer. Hes probably the best in the league at that role. Why overuse him? And we didn’t just overuse him, we ran him nonstop for the first few games of the year.
Use felix/choice in julius’ role and keep barber in the same role or similar role to last year. Theres no reason at all barber should see more than like 17 carries in a game unless hes flat out ripping a defense.
by foyesboys on Jan 12, 2009 8:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Its league politics
The same reason why LT has had so many carries and Sproiles so few. The highest paid guy starts and does the most. Thats the way it is, Im not saying its right, but our team is not the only one to make a decision like that
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 12, 2009 9:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Barber - YPC
well when it comes to Marion’s YPC – it would be interesting to see what the number is if you throw out the first washington game and everything after the thanksgiving toe injury….that would be a fairer assessment
by McLovin9 on Jan 12, 2009 4:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Running %
This has been buzzing in the back of my mind since Raf made his post. I’m not sure where its headed. But I thought I’d start getting some ideas down.
4th quarters are when we run the most, assuming we’re ahead. Its when Barber was/is his most effective. In 2007, we were 13-3. Obviously playing with a lead much of the year. Last year we trailed a lot more and thus were passing a lot more. Our relative leads probably explain much of the differences in run totals year over year.
So I think our overall philosophy is unchanged year over year as far as run/pass ratio is concerned. As Raf indicated, we are a pass-first team. Much like the Pats, Colts, Eagles, and others. It seems Garrett’s philosophy is to pass to get ahead then run the ball to close out the game.
I also seem to recall some excellent posts by Raf on the old boards discussing how d-linemen get more tired rushing the QBs than defending the run. Doesnt our strategy of the last 2 years support this point further?
The question becomes is this the optimal strategy for 2009?
I would be interested to see the statisitics of running by quarter. I suspect that we havent been very effective running the ball in the first halves. How many 2nd and 9’s, 3rd and sevens does it take for us to realize that may not be the best attacking strategy?
Perhaps Parcells said it best that you just have to keep hammering with the running game and eventually good things happen.
Anyway, I’m blathering on here. Trying to get out different ideas. I havent fully crystalized my thoughts on this very complicated, multi-faceted subject.
by Ridgelake on Jan 12, 2009 4:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
well - the first point for 2009
is that we go into the season with 3 known quantities at RB with NFL experience….you can’t say that has been the case over the last 2 years…as a matter of fact, i cannot remember ever having the overall talent at RB that we will have entering 2009 (assuming Barber and FeJo are healthy)….so i think that has to play into the gameplanning expectations for the start of 2009
by McLovin9 on Jan 12, 2009 4:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Furthermore,
the 3rbs; Roy Williams + TO; Witten; Romo; upgraded offensive line… who needs Jason Garrett?
One needn’t be a red-headed super genius to coordinate this offense to yards and points.
by Joey2zs on Jan 12, 2009 5:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Raf
You may know this was Cam Cameron an option last year if JG would have taken the ATL or Balt job?
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 12, 2009 5:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Looks like some hanky panky involving my favorite
QB and my least favorite announcer.
http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/DOJ/story?id=6629292&page=1
by Benthere on Jan 12, 2009 5:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Whatever it takes to get rid of Buck
He makes my skin crawl. Nothing worse than a pencil neck nerd who has no clue what a twit he is.
by StillHateTheGiants on Jan 12, 2009 9:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I will be surprised
if Garrett get the Rams job. I guess we will find out soon enough. I do agree that the Rams are a better organziation than Detroit but if you could win 6-7 games next year in Detroit then people would think you are some kind of football god. I know some think the OU QB may be the 1st pick but I really like the GA QB better. I also hope that Jerry will talk to David Lee if Garrett does leave.
by tyler2 on Jan 12, 2009 6:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Totally off topic, but I wonder if we are the first team in NFL history to lead the league in sacks but not make the playoffs. Anybody know?
by connery on Jan 12, 2009 7:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don't know where to find the info
But I bet the NY Sack Exchange Jets of the 80’s probably qualify.
by JimmyJohnson on Jan 12, 2009 8:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nah, it's happened probably 8-10 times just since the merger in 1970
maybe more…Dallas did join the Raiders as the only teams to lead the NFL in sacks five times (1966,1968-69, 1978, 2008). Fwiw…which is about nothing.
by DavidH22 on Jan 12, 2009 9:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Running only works
if you have effective blocking and an efficient passing game. I’m all for upping the run totals, but Romo has to be in a frame of mind to execute on fewer chances. Lets face it, while the 90’s Cowboys were a run first team, they had one of the most efficient passers in league history. You could tape a dime to your chest and Aikman could hit it. Here’s the problem with that…you must have precise routes run by your wide receivers, and we don’t have a lot of evidence to show ours can do that. If you look at the greatest running teams in recent history, they also had the ability to sustain a controlled passing attack. The 80’s and 90’s 49ers were not running teams by any stretch of the imagination. They employed the short passing game, with runs after the catch. So here’s what I’m saying…you can’t just go from a bunch of passing fools, to a running juggernaut. You have to mix it up. And with fewer opportunities in the passing game, you better not miss when you DO throw it. We can’t just sit there and say we’re going to run more. We have to have an overall plan to make it work.
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made.
Groucho Marx
by Lunging Wolf on Jan 13, 2009 6:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
The Run/Pass ratio this year was 40/60.
I think the biggest problem is that they abandon the run too early when they are down or the game is close.
by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 13, 2009 7:37 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Increasing that ratio to just 45%,
with their average ypc, and the Cowboys would have moved up to 11th in rushing, from 21st. Their sweet spot appears to be about 25-30 runs and about 30-35 pass plays.
by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 13, 2009 7:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
I have no problem with playcalling when we are winning (aside from the SF game someone pointed out). But when we are losing, even if its by less than 7 points, we are passing all the time, which lets the D tee off on romo, which theyve done with real success this year.
by foyesboys on Jan 13, 2009 2:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What was wrong with the play calling in the San Fran game?
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 13, 2009 8:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















