Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Has Kentucky Improved Since the Non-Conference Season?

Rams decision on Jason Garrett not expected until after the weekend

What's happening on the Jason Garrett front? Well, it looks like we should know the answer relatively soon since the Rams appear to be the last team left that is interested in his services. The official word from the St. Louis organization is that Garrett is still in the running and that a decision will come shortly after the weekend.

[The Rams] confirmed that Minnesota assistant head coach-defensive coordinator Leslie Frazier, Dallas assistant head coach-offensive coordinator Jason Garrett, Baltimore assistant head coach-defensive coordinator Rex Ryan, and New York Giants defensive coordinator Steve Spagnuolo are still in the running.

In fact, Devaney added a fifth name, saying that former New York Giants head coach Jim Fassel also was under consideration.

So that's the official word coming out of St. Louis. But the always amusing ‘sources' have narrowed it down further.

Devaney didn't name a front-runner, but one NFC personnel executive said Thursday that he thought the Rams were leaning toward Frazier. Another league source said Frazier and Spagnuolo were the most impressive candidates coming out of the interviews.

Indeed, this report from Yahoo Sports says the same, Leslie Frazier and Steve Spagnoulo are the two guys who still have a shot. Further complicating matters is the thought that the Rams might be waiting until after the weekend because they have a strong interest in Baltimore Ravens DC Rex Ryan. But Ryan is also reportedly a front-runner for the New York Jets job. Unless, of course, the Jets go with Spanoulo who recently had a second interview with the team

Got all that? Yeah, I know, whatever, let's just see what happens. One thing I do get out of all that mess is that it looks likely that Garrett will not be hired by the Rams. If that's the case, then it's pretty certain he will return to the Cowboys as the OC which leads to a whole new set of questions. Mainly, is the situation between him and T.O. so dire that he really has issued some kind of ultimatum that he can't co-exist with T.O. next year? Does the fact that he has no other real option if he doesn't get the Rams job factor into that equation for Jerry Jones? Is Jones so enamored with Garrett that he would actually give into the demand, if it has actually been made? I don't know but the next week or so should be interesting.

If you didn't know already, Tennessee Titans DC Jim Schwartz got the Detroit Lions job so that's no longer an option for Garrett. 

Meanwhile, the receiving corps of the Cowboys has come to the defense of T.O. RW2 has a Q&A with Nick Eatman where he sings the praises of T.O. and hopes that #81 and #11 will line up together for the Cowboys next year. He also discusses how he and Tony Romo need to get on the same page and develop the trust factor over the offseason. Patrick Crayton also loves him some T.O. although he did concede that T.O. and Garrett had a rocky relationship at the end of the season. Hat tip to BTB-regular jsams for the post of Crayton's interview, here. And finally, the one guy who you knew would be in T.O.'s corner, agent Drew Rosenhaus, weighs-in here.

I found this highly amusing. The DMN blog reports on the efforts to sign free-agent Chris Canty. 

The Raiders signed defensive lineman Tommy Kelly to a seven-year, $50.5 million contract ($18.125 million guaranteed) last winter that raised a lot of eyebrows around the league. That deal would be the starting point for negotiations if the Cowboys want to keep Chris Canty from determining his value in the open market.

"It'd have to start somewhere around there, if not higher," said Brad Blank, Canty's agent. "We talked very briefly last summer at that level, and [the Cowboys] didn't seem very interested."

Please. That number is ridiculous for Canty. If the Cowboys make that kind of mistake and give him that kind of money, then Jerry Jones should fire Jerry Jones as the GM. I like Canty, I still wonder if he has more game than what he's shown, but I'm not willing to spend that kind of money to find out.

0 recs  |  Comment 74 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

well

(dripping with sarcasm) Although Canty is clearly not worth that, given JJ’s propensity, Canty would probably get it if he was 35 and at the end of his career.

by dave33 on Jan 16, 2009 11:00 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Jerry

has been making some Al Davisesque moves lately. I wonder if they get their sweat suits from the same place?

by GunsUp on Jan 16, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

lol

totally

George Teague did it all.

by Aaron Novinger on Jan 16, 2009 1:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No Raiders Deal

should be used as a benchmark ever.

They were one of the three big spenders in total contracts last year, along with the Jets and Cowboys. At least the latter two got players who had performed.

The Raiders dumped D’Angelo Hall and Javon Walker weeks after giving them insane signing bonuses.

Maybe the Raiders will give Chris the money he wants.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 16, 2009 11:21 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Nothing

Jerry does surprises me any more. I just get up every day and check to see the next freak that the circus brought to town. Jerry reminds me of a very old and very rich Carny.

by GunsUp on Jan 16, 2009 11:26 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Raiders

What a nightmare.. You have to love Al Davis calling plays from the owners box..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 16, 2009 11:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's not

that funny. I bet JJ gets a direct line to the sideline installed in the new stadium. Or, maybe he can just call them over the P.A. since everyone knows what we are going to run anyway.

When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.

by GunsUp on Jan 16, 2009 12:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Can i laugh at that?

Or is that not funny either?

by joey7289 on Jan 16, 2009 12:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You are

perfectly welcome to laugh at whatever you want. I can just see JJ copying Al any day now.

When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.

by GunsUp on Jan 16, 2009 12:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh ok lol

And yes i do kind of believe that…if it gets Jerry hype he’ll do it.

by joey7289 on Jan 16, 2009 1:05 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I see this TO decision coming up as one that could prpel him in that direction

If he listens to his people, including his son, and dumps TO, I think it would show that he his headed in the opposite direction from Davis, but if he remains keen on keeping TO, then he is going to leave no doubt that he and only he is in charge, something that Davis is always enforcing.

In reference to how good the Steelers have been in their history: "No one is even close to them."- Steal Home

by hinduplaya on Jan 16, 2009 1:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

and Canty is gone if he expects that kind of doe

Move Ratliff to his spot, replace Spears with Hatcher and draft or acquire a true 3-4 NT….problem solved…

by Boyzfan94 on Jan 16, 2009 11:26 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

+1

Canty better smarten up, he may be a player we let test the market and try to match the deal.

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 16, 2009 11:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

easier said than done

True 3-4 NT who aren’t excessively overweight and old are hard to come by.

Also, why would you want Hatcher to replace Spears? Spears is a much better player as Hatcher hasn’t shown much as of late.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 16, 2009 12:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

NT is a definite

but I don’t know if moving Ratliff to DE in ’09 is in the cards.

I’m trying to get more info on Marcus Dixon. He was making a move in camp and his position coach was really, really excited to see him play. Then he injured his back, missed all the preseason games and was put on the practice squad. In some ways, his injury gave Dallas a redshirt year with him.

If he has any real promise, and Canty gets a crazy contract (which is possible. It only takes one team falling in love with him for this to happen) then he goes.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 16, 2009 12:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good Info Raf

Kind of excites me, he was a beast when he played, minus all the problems around him.

by joey7289 on Jan 16, 2009 12:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Raf any info on Hatcher

i remember you were real excited about him in his second year when he was tearing it up at camp, but whats been going on with him lately?

He made a few plays in his second year and was pretty much non-existent last year. If Canty goes we’re looking at the very real possibility of him being a starter in ’09. Whats the scoop?

BTW a guy who’s caught my eye of late as a possible mid-round DE is Jarron Gilbert. He played in the WAC for San Jose State, but put up some real impressive numbers. 9.5 sacks and 22 TFL. The guy also sems to have prototypical 3-4 DE size at 6-6 280 w/ room to put on weight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gK_SxTr4jZs

by boysinyabelly on Jan 16, 2009 1:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You need more than

2 DE’s to rotate.

You can let canty go and play ratliff/spears/hatcher/bowens.
Spears is stout against the run.
NT’s don’t grow on trees. Maybe Salvi can help but you need at leats 2 other DL if canty leaves.
Spears may be too tall to play the nose. I would give him a shot.

by oneforthethumb on Jan 16, 2009 7:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Crayton....

see what is wrong with this team?? why is this idiot on ESPN 2 days in a row talking about TO???

its the offseason – no playoffs….go home, STFU and maybe play some golf

why does this team have to be in the news (using that term loosely) EVERY damn day….no wonder there is always drama, always some distraction and absolutely NO FOCUS on the important things during the season

TO needs to go??? ‘big game’ Crayton and his big mouth may as well go too

by McLovin9 on Jan 16, 2009 11:27 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I wonder if BSPN was a paid apperance, crayton is on the low end of the vet player contracts

he may be there just for the extra scratch.

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Jan 16, 2009 11:31 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Big surprise loudmouth, idiot Crayton is good buddies with TO. They can both be gone for all I care.

by GhostofGaryHogeboom on Jan 16, 2009 2:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

George Teague did it all.

by Aaron Novinger on Jan 16, 2009 2:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah I am not buying the JJ to Al Davis transformation. Shoot from the hip

commentary, a lot of the comments in the last few articles show that this is a lot of venting a lot of anger that needs to be directed somewhere and it has a shotgun effect on what topics get hit.

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Jan 16, 2009 11:30 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I don't think JJ is

becoming the next Al Davis, but you do have to question the circus type atmosphere in Dallas and the one in Oakland.

When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.

by GunsUp on Jan 16, 2009 11:32 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm all for team chemistry and for doing whatever it takes to get that back...

Yet the more I think about this the more I believe Owens should stay. Cutting Owens does not free up enough cap space that makes his departure earth-shattering awesome and in fact will hinder the Cowboys in the pursuit of free agents and signing players like Ware. However, it is extremely important that the coaches sit down and really have an honest talk with Owens, clear the air, get it all out on the table and move forward. I still think Owens is capable of being a difference maker on offense and with a healthy RW2 and a training camp with Romo I think this offense can rebound from a (relatively) sub-par season in 2008.

My only regret is that if Owens stays that means that Miles Austin will have that much more trouble getting on the field. If he’s healthy he can be a gamebreaker and can stretch the field for the big guys underneath to come open. However, I think if given the chance, Austin has the ability to beat out Crayton for the #3 spot (which he kinda did already).

Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog: easy to use, free to join.

by Brandon Worley on Jan 16, 2009 11:42 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

the issue is not the cap numbers

its about winning. let me explain. if Crayton and Williams are saying there were some problems between TO and RG and TO didn’t really respect him, then its worse than said, because normally they sugar coat that stuff.

if TO is being discussed internally and some coaches don’t want him. keeping him will only make him feel protected by Jerry and make things worse and cause more divisiveness. that doesn’t induce winning as chemistry despite what Jerry says is important. Chemistry is about working together. ability to work together and be functional. which involces trust and communication. without those, its difficult to work together.

so that leads to losing. regardless of what RW2 and Crayton are saying, another OC is not going to fix the problem specially if Romo and Witten disagree. now you got different factions in the locker room and that doesn’t induce winning regardless of who is right or wrong.

by CowboysFanatic on Jan 16, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Keep T.O.

Most productive skill player, freed things up for other receivers by drawing double teams, actually showed up against the Eagles (100+ yds) at the end of the year and only proven #1 WR. Oh, and we’ll pay more money for him if he leaves. No brainer.

Though T.O. is no saint he’s not the problem. The problem is Romo, his practice habits, his locking-in on Witten and his not being ready, mentally, to be a big game QB. Until Romo gets over that hump we’re not going anywhere. And for anyone that says “well, Romo feels he has to placate T.O.,” then Romo needs to be stronger in that sense, too. Less Cabo and Jess, fewer INT’s in big spots and more anger after losing big games.

Other problems: Cowardly snitches feeding Werder info, Red Headed “the league has caught up with me,” “sophomore slump” Geniuses.

I’m tired of this “Owens is charismatic” BS. The reason why guys side with him is because they believe what he does. That’s why Gurode and Williams called Witten out, and that’s why many in Philly were on his side vs McChoke. McChoke has always been a babied, pampered ‘company man’ of the Eagles and T.O. sure as heck wasn’t the only guy who felt that way there.

T.O. can be a pain in the rear, no denying that. He’s also the hardest-working guy we have (recall the rundowns of opposition players on INT’s, blocks downfield, training regimen, etc) and he will be the 2nd or 3rd (Moss) best WR in the history of the league when he’s done. He’s been to the Super Bowl, been a playoff hero and is still the best proven playmaker on the team. Others want to say this guy and that guy will take his spot, that’s all speculation based on nothing but stuff such as RW2’s one standout year in Detroit. T.O. has proven himself again and again and again as a producer on the field, and if Jerry lets the media try to play GM for him and ditches T.O., he’s a fool. Do not expect that to happen, particularly with the new stadium opening up and seats needing to be sold.

by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 16, 2009 12:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.

by gee-roj on Jan 16, 2009 1:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

nice sig

In reference to how good the Steelers have been in their history: "No one is even close to them."- Steal Home

by hinduplaya on Jan 16, 2009 1:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+3!!!

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by what_the_crap on Jan 16, 2009 1:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

not true at all

You get rid of T.O., Romo becomes a much better qb.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 16, 2009 1:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sorry I can not agree with that.

If anything it puts more pressure on the young guys.

by joey7289 on Jan 16, 2009 1:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no it doesn't

You get rid of T.O., Romo becomes the vocal everyone wants him to be, and doesn’t feel pressure to always having to appease T.O.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 16, 2009 1:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He can become vocal now

He doesn’t have to wait for TO…

by joey7289 on Jan 16, 2009 1:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

not true

Players have to walk on egg shells regarding T.O., thats why we don’t have any vocal leaders

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 16, 2009 3:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Why

Why does everyone treat TO like a big bad monster.

by joey7289 on Jan 16, 2009 3:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And he doesn't have to appease To

He can do what he wants, he is a grown man correct?

by joey7289 on Jan 16, 2009 1:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no kidding...

Can you imagine Brady or Manning worrying about appeasing anyone?

0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.

by gee-roj on Jan 16, 2009 1:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's Brady's offense. That's Manning's offense.

This should be Romo’s offense.

George Teague did it all.

by Aaron Novinger on Jan 16, 2009 1:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It can be

It’s not Owens is offense.

by joey7289 on Jan 16, 2009 1:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

True

Owens should not be the focal point. I think it’s just dumb to take a huge cap hit.

Okay, I’ve seen $600,000+ or $9million. Anybody know which of these is the actual hit for next year.

George Teague did it all.

by Aaron Novinger on Jan 16, 2009 1:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No

But I would love to see Roy WIlliams with one on one cover, over Roy Williams in double coverage.

by joey7289 on Jan 16, 2009 1:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I would like to see Roy room with Romo on the road

so they can toss the ball back and forth in the lobby, by the pool, and off the balcony.
That would free up Witten to room with T.O. so they can have crunchie contests.

George Teague did it all.

by Aaron Novinger on Jan 16, 2009 1:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Salary cap ramifications for T.O.

Here’s the deal in simplistic terms:

If they keep T.O. they pay him roughly $9 million this year

If they cut him, that $9 million is dead money that they can’t use for any other players, plus there’s a $6800,000 hit tacked on.

So basically you pay him $9 million to play or have $9,6800,000 in dead money to make him go away.

by Dave Halprin on Jan 16, 2009 2:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Which means

if he’s not here for one more year, then someone feels really strong about moving on without him.

George Teague did it all.

by Aaron Novinger on Jan 16, 2009 2:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think that is quite right

The salary cap ramification is correct. But the Cowboys won’t be paying Owens $9 million this year. I believe his base salary this year is $2.7 million, and he is owed a roster bonus of $3.1 million on June 3rd. The remainder charged to the salary cap is the pro rata portion of his signing bonus.

by NCCowboy on Jan 16, 2009 2:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks, Grizz, for the info

That’s even a worse situation than I thought if T.O. were to be cut.

by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 16, 2009 4:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

THE REAL TERRELL OWENS CAP IMPACT

OK, here it is – the real, REAL numbers:

Owens deal included $13 guaranteed – $12.9M was in a signing bonus and the other $100,000 was guaranteed as part of his 2008 salary. Therefore, prorate $12.9 over 4 years and you have $3,225,000 per season.

Cutting T.O.
If Dallas cuts Owens before paying him his roster bonus due June 3, the remaining amount of his signing bonus is accelerated into the 2009 cap figure:

$9,675,000 ($3.225M x 3 years remaining)

Keeping T.O.
If Dallas keeps him for 2009, they owe him a $3M roster bonus on June 3, plus a salary of $2.67M. Add that to the prorated signing bonus ($3.225M) and you get:

$8,895,000 ($3M + $2.67M + $3.225M)

So:

Cut:    $9.675M
Keep: $8.895M

Difference: $680,000 more if he is cut.

Q.E.D.

Stop the Madness - Enshrine Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com

by Raul Villaronga on Jan 16, 2009 5:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks, Raul

You guys are the best. Grizz, yourself, Raf and everyone else here — always gettin’ er done!

thumbs up

by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 16, 2009 5:33 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Definitely.

And the other WRs become better WRs. And Garrett opens up the offense more, if he stays.

George Teague did it all.

by Aaron Novinger on Jan 16, 2009 1:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Paul dead on,man. its about time that blame is placed squarely where it belongs.Romo needs to

take charge of this offense and be a man about it . He needs to work as hard as TOin the off season,he needs to focus on his timing with his recievers,with making his reads and not locking on to one receiver to the point that defenses know where he is going with the ball. He needs to be a vocal leader of men and develop contingency plans with his receivers. When the protection breaks down he and his receivers should be on the same page,he should know as should they exactly where the ball needs to be. He needs to take care of the ball and run with it sometime instead of just throwing it up for grabs.Romo gets way too much defense from some on this board for sub par play and a lack of concern for ball safety. myopia is a bitch,step back and get some perspective.yes terry if he had better protection things would have been different they also would have been different if he’d just stop throwing up jump balls at least once a game.

Don't believe everything you think.

Your causes are cute!!!

by stoproyce on Jan 16, 2009 2:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks, stoproyce

I’ve said this before and I’ll repeat it: I’m a HUGE Romo fan. I do think he’s the guy, without a doubt. But it’s clear to me now that the Giants playoff game last year was no fluke. Romo has several mental aspects of the game to work on, IMO, including taking losses a bit harder, getting to a spot where he can perform better in big games and not enjoying the ‘comeback’ in games so much (I’m thinking of Arizona and Baltimore games this year, among others). In other words, Romo needs to have the laser-focus earlier in games BEFORE we’re down a bunch. He needs more Aikman and Brady in him and less “aw, shucks, I get to go bang Jess” of an attitude.

I’m not saying everyone else but Romo is perfect. They’re not, including T.O. and the O-Line and the coaching staff. But I view Romo as the gating item in terms of our making and having success in the playoffs right now.

The reason why everyone’s on this “Charismatic T.O.” nonsense is because the media felt that the team would turn on T.O. and instead they turned on cowardly snitches and Romo’s practice habits. So now Owens is like Barack Obama in terms of his appeal, supposedly. I think that’s a joke. Professional athletes are going to say what they feel, especially guys as competitive as NFL players. They just want to win, and if they feel someone saying stuff to Ed Werder is hurting that goal then it’s going to come out. And it did, and it didn’t go the way Werder and many in local media wanted it to go. I wrote JFE right after her “Charismatic T.O.”-type article and told her “Yep, I knew you were going to write this piece after you reported that T-New said a coward is tearing the team apart.” In other words, the dominoes werent falling the way the media wanted them to in their manipulation of the blame game so it was time to play the ‘Charismatic T.O.’ game.

Most of the people here know how the media game works. This junk with T.O. is just the latest flurry to hurt him and Dallas. Ditto on Pac Man. That doesn’t mean there’s not info to report or this is all made up, but when ESPN’s headline says “Cowboys May Release Owens” and then the info in the article says that issue hasn’t even been brought up yet in a serious way among management you know what the agenda is.

As far as Owens goes, he definitely has his problems. I wish his hands were better, wish he didn’t cut some routes short and I wish he wouldn’t lobby for more action via Deion or other surrogates. All of that being said, I absolutely believe that T.O. is all about winning and his actions come from that. T.O. does have a strong personality. So what? Time for some of the other guys to suck it up and grow a pair.

The one thing you can say about T.O. that you can’t yet say about Romo or about guys like McNabb is he likes pressure and thrives in it. Broken ankle before Super Bowl? Big game. 49ers need a TD pass to beat the Packers? Owens. JJT calls Owens out as over the hill? 200+ yards receiving. Must-have game when Romo and others go fetal position against the Birds? 100+ yards. There are plenty of other examples.

Owens is a high-strung, ultra-competitive physical freak warrior. He’s a sure-fire Hall of Famer who still has plenty left. I don’t think he missed any games this year. Has he lost some skill? Yeah, he has. But not enough that he can’t still contribute in a big way next year, especially when RW2, Felix Jones, Choice, Bennett, etc are more integrated and other things (like the line and coaching) are hopefully also improved.

People like ESPN know the deal. They understand that if things go properly then the team the Cowboys were supposed to be this year they may be able to be next year. For guys like Werder and some of his bosses at ESPN, they don’t want that to happen. They don’t want T.O. to succeed, and they don’t want the Cowboys to succeed with him. You think that Pac Man story being scheduled for Week 1 of the playoffs was a surprise in terms of timing? Heck no. That was a Werder before Giants special to help drag the Boys down had they made the playoffs. Again, it’s not if information exists. There is a ton of stuff out there on many guys and teams in the league. It’s what, and when, you choose to pursue it. It’s not an accident that the loudest voices that want T.O. gone from the team are guys that hate him and the Cowboys (Carter, Wilbon, …).

T.O. can play on my team anytime. You can’t replace guys like him so you find ways to deal with their quirks and unleash them. I love that guy. And when you see guys like Harrison and Plax doing the gun thing you realize that T.O. has never had any kind of legal issues and it makes all the hate for him even curiouser. Stephen A. Smith, who was in Philly for the McNabb/T.O. fiasco, says that was more McNabb’s thing, I’m pretty sure. And Smith is correct. SF was T.O.‘s fault, in my opinion, but not Philly. Besides the Deion interview I don’t think T.O. did much of anything this year.

Bring him back. Do not pay extra money, and have more dead money, to take your best playmaker away. I’m certain either or both Machiavelli and/or Sun-Tzu have lessons on what happens when you allow your enemies to devise your strategies for you, personnel or otherwise. To quote Dennis Hopper: “Bad things, man. Bad things.” ESPN, Werder, Wilbon, Cris Carter need to shut up or cease being listened to by Cowboys fans and management. They’re not friends, they’re not neutral, and they’re not looking out for the team’s best interest. Ditto many in the local media who understand that if they trash T.O. and the team they have a better chance of getting more run on ESPN. That means you, JJT.

This is all a big game to the media types. You just have to understand how it is played. I worked in the media, and I have a brother who did, too. He interviewed T.O. way back in SF. He thought T.O. was great. I feel the same way. Not perfect, great.

Jerry – you know what you have to do.

Keep T.O.

by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 16, 2009 5:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

On Pac Man incident timing...

…it may have been Week 2 of the playoffs and not Week 1. Can’t recall.

by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 16, 2009 5:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

One other thing...

…I totally agree with basically everything that you said, stoproyce.

People think that T.O. wants to overpower everybody and wants people around him to be weak. NO. I know people like T.O. and they actually want people to meet their intensity level and bring it, and, as stoproyce said, be men about it. Cut the cowardly BS leaking with Werder. That’s what the team via Gurode and Williams was saying, as well as T-New. Guys like T.O. will only respect you if you stand up to them and for yourself. So stop worrying about trying to get rid of the guy and just step up and go the extra mile. That’s good for the team, it’s what T.O. wants and it will help the team to win.

People misunderstand Owens, I think. You just have to get how much he wants to win and how competitive he is to understand what he does. He’s nearing the end and he wants Garrett and Romo to get up to speed fast before his time runs out. That’s where all of his verbalizing comes from.

During the last Eagles game, you could see T.O. go into a kind-of a fatherly mode, almost, with Romo. He could have melted down or done the kind of things people think he’s about but he didn’t. Why? Because it was over. Meaning, his behavior before was to try to help get results. Now that the game and season were lost, there was no reason to be fired up or try to get people motivated. And that resignation shows me that all of this isn’t because he’s jealous of Witten or doesn’t like Romo or any of that. It’s about trying to win. Once that goal was gone, T.O. calmed down and was talking with shell-shocked Romo. You hope that this is finally starting to get through to Romo, and I think that last game may finally have done it. If that is the case, then the embarrassment loss may actually end up helping us in the end.

by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 16, 2009 5:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I say good luck canty

let him go out and test the market for a 3-4 DE that is not so impressive in his stats and see what kind of offer he gets, then we can decide to match it or not. We have bowen and hatcher who maybe ready to step in and can probably draft for depth.

by CowboysFanatic on Jan 16, 2009 11:46 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

I harbor no ill-will toward Canty (except for not living up to our stellar expectations). We was adequate for a 4th Rounder. If somebody wants to overpay him, good for him!

I will say that I was disappointed in Hatcher this season. I wonder if he was hurt. If not, I’m afraid he may be a step down from Canty.

by JimmyJohnson on Jan 16, 2009 12:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Read the comments of the anonymous player again . . .

But one teammate suggested Romo is frustrated enough that he might initiate a different approach, although not the confrontational kind that some believe might solve the problem.

“To be completely honest, I just think Tony is over it, not like, ‘Screw it.’ But I think Tony is over the mind games,‘’ the player said. "It would help if Tony would stand up to him, but he would never do it. He does a great job of ignoring it and not letting it affect him, and that’s why it has worked as good as it has. It’s just hard. I think right now everybody is to the point where, ’We’re going to need him, so let’s not piss him off.’”

But Owens seems to be finding it increasingly difficult to conceal his irritation. Last week in Pittsburgh, on the first possession of the Cowboys’ most important game of the season, a team source who reviewed the game tape said Romo threw an interception when Owens mysteriously failed to complete his route. Troy Polamalu intercepted the ball at the place where Romo expected Owens to be. Later in the half, Romo underthrew a pass for Owens that was intercepted by Ike Taylor and Owens gestured openly in Romo’s direction as he walked toward the sideline that the ball should have been thrown further upfield.

But what upset Owens’ teammates most of all was his response to the interception Romo threw on a pass intended for Witten that Deshea Townsend returned for the game-winning touchdown in a 20-13 defeat. Both the quarterback and tight end publicly accepted blame for the Cowboys’ season-high fifth turnover. In contrast, Owens said the offense stunk, that the team can’t win with turnovers like those and then suggested his defender was playing off in single coverage and that he was open but Romo decided to throw elsewhere on the fatal play.

On the sideline, Owens was seen yelling at a Cowboys assistant coach. In his news conference after the game, Owens implied that Romo’s decision to throw to Witten was the wrong one, saying, "It’s his job to go out there and assess what the defense is, and he made that decision.’’

That incensed some Cowboys, one of whom said, "If you only knew all that guy does. It’s gonna go down with him before it’s all over with. He is unbelievable. Tough loss and he does that?’’

Until then, Cowboys insiders considered Owens’ most damaging behavior the interview he did with former Dallas cornerback Deion Sanders on the NFL Network in which he suggested the offensive system under Garrett was responsible for his worst statistical season since his rookie year with the 49ers. Owens also hinted that Romo and the other Dallas quarterbacks who played when the starter was injured were not making getting him the ball a high enough priority. "I can’t throw it and catch it,’’ Owens said.

At least one prominent Cowboys player was displeased that the coaching staff responded to the criticism by seemingly placating Owens in that Sunday’s game against San Francisco, allowing him enough opportunities that he posted his best statistical line as a Cowboy: seven catches for 213 yards, including a 75-yard TD.

"Well, T.O. got his way,‘’ the player said. "It never fails how we operate around here. Drives me crazy, but what can you do?’’

by NCCowboy on Jan 16, 2009 11:46 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

These reports make me laugh

They make me feel like I’m in high school again.

by joey7289 on Jan 16, 2009 12:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Me too

I feel like I’m reading the national enquirer or something of that ilk. If this actually 100% true and not tailored by the media to create a more interesting story, then I’m sure the Cowboys will let him go. But I’ve had enough personal experience with the media to know that they’re rarely, if ever, giving us the full story.

0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.

by gee-roj on Jan 16, 2009 12:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It sucks

that this is always gonna be an issue as long as these players are here.

George Teague did it all.

by Aaron Novinger on Jan 16, 2009 1:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

it's beginning to look like the so-called source is becoming a cancer

that dude needs to grow up.

"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson

www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]

by silverblue5 on Jan 16, 2009 1:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

HAHAHAHAHA.

Well said.

Game Recognize Game

by pretty ricky on Jan 16, 2009 1:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice post NC Cowboy

That’s what sucks about having TO right there. He’s a great asset on the field. Also, dedicated and hard working. He has a “down year” by his standards and still puts up over 1,000 yds and 10 TD’s.

Yet, he’s also so sensitive and combustible that people try to placate him at the expense of the team. The team is stuck between a rock and a hard place.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Jan 16, 2009 7:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Romo criticised the scheme too

I am a big Romo fan, but was pretty disappointed that he complained about the scheme after the Eagles loss. The scheme didn’t cause his fumble…

by BoyfromOz on Jan 17, 2009 2:47 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

09_bar-refaeli_08_small
NFL Drafting 101
Small
Romo for president? Why would Tony take the pay cut and less power?
Smilinmiles_small
My plan to take the Cowboys to the SB.
Captain_small
Seven Statistical Nuggets To Start the Off-Season
Captain_small
It may be time for a new type of O-Line ... Part II

Recent FanPosts

Small
Dallas Cowboys Needs and Potential Answers Part I
Tcb_small
2010 Breakout Performer
Small
Manning and Favre - a personal disappointment
Small
Can Wade be Colonel Hogan with a headset?
Photo_150_small
What To Expect in 2010?
Small
The Inevitable yet Spontaneously Elementary Truth…
Small
Saints now America's team, Steelers fans sulk
Cowboyjet_small
CONTEST RESULTS
Fp4273_dallas-cowboys-tony-romo-posters_small
Cowboys mock draft version 3 w/ Extras
Tom-landry-at_small
Michael Irvin Accused Of Rape

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mocking The Draft
Morgan Burnett NFL Draft scouting report
The Phinsider
A quick look at free agent tight ends
Mocking The Draft
A case for Sam Bradford going first overall

SPONSORS


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer