Cowboys assistants sought by other teams
An update on the coaching searches around the NFL involving Cowboys assistants. The Rams are interested in receivers coach Ray Sherman.
According to a source, Dallas Cowboys wide receivers coach Ray Sherman will be asked to interview for the St. Louis Rams head coaching vacancy.
Meanwhile, Jason Garrett, despite any misgivings Cowboys fans might have about his 2008 performance, is still a hot commodity, at least for interviews. The Rams might be considering him in addition to Sherman.
In addition, the Rams are considering former New York Giants coach Jim Fassel and have talked to the agents of Giants defensive coordinator Steve Spagnuolo and Dallas assistant head coach-offensive coordinator Jason Garrett.
Also, the Broncos have him on their list of candidates.
The Broncos have also sought - but not yet been given - permission to interview offensive coordinator Jason Garrett of the Dallas Cowboys.
So by my count that's the Rams, Broncos and Lions who want to talk to Garrett.
After the firing of special teams coach Bruce Read, the name that keeps popping up as a successor is Joe DeCamillis.
Sources said the team is interested in Jacksonville special teams coach Joe DeCamillis, who coached with Phillips when Phillips was defensive coordinator at Denver and Atlanta.
DeCamillis, whose two-year contract with the Jaguars ended after the season, was not available for comment.
DeCamillis has had a successful career as a special teams coach and would be a welcomed addition if the Cowboys go in that direction.
In the "yeah, I remember that" department, Mike Holmgren at his final press conference for the Seahawks was asked about his greatest achievements as GM of Seattle. His answer:
(On what his proudest achievements were as general manager) I felt pretty good after we got two No. 1s for Joey Galloway (from the Dallas Cowboys in 2000). I was dealing with Jerry Jones, and Jerry's a pretty shrewd guy but a dealmaker. That worked out well for us, that particular trade.
Ugh.
0 recs |
75 comments
|
Comments
Ray Freakin' Sherman??
Maybe he can teach Isaac Bruce to run lousy patterns, quit on routes, not block downfield, and cry like a little girl when he doesn’t get enough touches. Good riddance, Ray.
(I won’t indignify all of you by saying "1st").
by GhostofGaryHogeboom on Jan 2, 2009 12:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Isaac Bruce???
I think you meant Tori Holt. Bruce is now in San Fran.
by troysboys on Jan 2, 2009 4:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They are going through the "Rooney Rule" motions...I really hope Garrett hoodwinks them like he did Jerry, Atlanta, and Baltimore...
He’s not going to Denver, not even sure if they have a GM, and with no GM they aren’t going to make the same mistake Jerry did by getting suckered into buying the cart before bringing in the mule…
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
by BoyzRback on Jan 2, 2009 12:41 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I read this post pretty often but haven't seen anyone mention this...
I was listening to a local radio (NY) station and they were wondering why Wade Phillips was retained… One interesting thing they brought up was… Jerry Jones and Holmgren have been longtime friends, so imagine Jerry calls Mike and expresses interest, but Holmgren says he wants to stay out one year. Whats Jerry to do?? Retain Captain Cupcake…
Maybe just wishful thinking…
Happy New Years to all
A Cowboy fan from Dallas residing in enemy terretory since 1990..
by Jtiner09 on Jan 2, 2009 1:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh no! Jerry Jones is a man of his word. Wade Phillips and the entire coaching staff will stay
as status quo….except for Bruce Read; except for; except for…………….!
Wharter
by Wharter on Jan 2, 2009 1:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So...
When Martin Mayhew gets canned in five years or so is he going to cite the Roy Williams trade as his crowning achievement?
by mikedallas45 on Jan 2, 2009 1:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
They didn't get a whole lot for him considering he was a top 10 pick
they actually lost value in that trade. And a first and a third is not the same as two firsts.
by quincyyyyy on Jan 2, 2009 2:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Funny how things change
About this time last year I was worried that Garrett would head off to be a HC somewhere…now, I’m worried that he won’t.
by IronCowboy on Jan 2, 2009 1:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
lol...funny Iron....although don't I think we would be sitting here all doom and gloom if he left 12 months ago...
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
by BoyzRback on Jan 2, 2009 9:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So
if Garrett goes …. who do we get to replace him? Any thoughts?
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by what_the_crap on Jan 2, 2009 1:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ray Sherman
better relations with the WR corps that Garrett doesn’t have.
by quincyyyyy on Jan 2, 2009 2:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I've suggested David Lee before.
Look at what hes done with Miami’s offense with about half the talent the Boys have.
by houseofprime on Jan 2, 2009 2:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
as he called plays beofre?
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 2, 2009 2:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he was Arkansas' offensive coordinator.
by houseofprime on Jan 2, 2009 2:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
has plenty of Coordinator experience
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Lee_(quarterback)
None in the NFL, QB coach here from 03-05, his lack NFL OC experience makes me nervous. He might have the same problem adjusting to calling plays in the NFL, but he definitely brings more experience calling plays then Jason G. did when he arrived.
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 2, 2009 3:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
David Lee is exactly who i was thinking
He and Romo had a great relationship. Plus, he is of the Parcells coaching tree.
by TARHEEL PAUL on Jan 2, 2009 5:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
not too impressed with the saplings that grown from that tree....
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
by BoyzRback on Jan 2, 2009 9:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Al Saunders available ?
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
by BoyzRback on Jan 2, 2009 9:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
that
would be nice.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by what_the_crap on Jan 3, 2009 8:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
good info
The Cowboys have three sets of eyeballs at the Cotton Bowl. College scouting coordinator Chris Hall is joined by Southwest area scout Sam Garza and West area scout Henry Sroka.
The Cowboys got one last look at Felix Jones during last year’s Cotton Bowl. It wouldn’t be surprising if they ended up with a player or two from today’s game.
Forget about Texas Tech WR Michael Crabtree, who will be a top-10 pick. Ole Miss LT Michael Oher, a prototype pass blocker, is also expected to be a first-rounder.
Record-setting Tech QB Graham Harrell is a guy who would make sense for the Cowboys, assuming he’s around in the middle rounds. Tech FS Darcel McBath, a converted CB with excellent cover skills, could also fill a Cowboys’ need. Red Raiders LG Louis Vasquez (6-6, 335) and LT Rylan Reed (6-7, 314) should also be drafted.
Other Ole Miss NFL prospects include speedy WR Mike Wallace and DT Peria Jerry
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 2, 2009 3:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Love to see Jerry trade into the 1st to get Oher.
Mcbath has a pick six in the game. Like what I have seen from Wallace as well.
by houseofprime on Jan 2, 2009 3:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
McBath has decent size..
Harrell would be nice as a back-up.
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 2, 2009 3:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Harrell
looks like garbage today
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by what_the_crap on Jan 2, 2009 3:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he's a system qb
color me not impressed
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 2, 2009 3:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
could be true
They have that type of system there
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 2, 2009 3:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
system QB my ass...The dude is able to deliver quick progression reads,quick pass, on target with tremendous accuracy..
and with a line that plays matador half the time, I’d prefer a quick read, quick release guy in Dallas…Harrell would surely be on my watch list come draft day.
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
by BoyzRback on Jan 2, 2009 10:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
chicken or the egg came first?
Tech’s line was only responsible for 11 sacks prior to the Cotton Bowl
by WestTxHornFan on Jan 3, 2009 1:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
exactly....700+ pass plays - 11 sacks allowed...
5 linemen spread wide – no TE’s…..meaning 4-5 WR’s out on pass patterns…
That makes for many pass rush lanes, and very suseptable to blitz packages to have odd number of rushers…
meaning he must have a very fast rythmic read progression rate, must be able to deliver the ball within 3 seconds with a quick release, and go over at least 2-3-even 4 read options on most plays, delivering the ball in stride, and on target, with little room for error…
I have to admit, I really don’t get a chance to see much of him, aside from highlights of him lighting it up…..But IF your suggesting it’s because of his O Line that he has been so successful for several years, I’d have to have my doubts…..cuz none of their O Linemen are considered first day draft options, and going by their measurables, they have the same type of linemen we have here, all about 6’7" 330lbs…with very slow 40 times…so i can only assume they are big slow gorilla mugs, with little mobility, yet are unmovable and able to handle smallish DL’s…The LG on Tech is somebody we should be looking at in rounds 3-4 though……..in any event….Harrell is the real deal, and if there in rounds 3-4 I’d be all over him too…
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
by BoyzRback on Jan 3, 2009 5:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Just when I was to the point that I could tolerate Holmgren
He had to bring up that trade again. LOL!
by illcowboy on Jan 2, 2009 3:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Joey Galloway trade...
If memory serves, the Seahawks got Shaun Alexander and Koren Robinson with those 2 picks. Alexander would’ve been great for us after Emmitt left. Oh well, can’t cry over spilt milk.
by troysboys on Jan 2, 2009 4:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
OC
Doesn’t really matter about the OC, Wade will get fired after next season and a whole new staff will come in. Probably Holmgren, Shanahan, or Cowher
by just4fun on Jan 2, 2009 5:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
nope
Jason Garrett will be our next head coach. I hope is back, next year he is going to look the true Genius he is..
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 2, 2009 5:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If he gets offered the Denver job no way he turns that down.
They have a ton of talent on offense.
by houseofprime on Jan 2, 2009 6:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh no way..
Best job available. Stocked on O, some talent on D. If champ gets healthy Garrett will look like a Genuis..
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 2, 2009 6:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Denver will have a good d-line in a couple of years
right now they are really green, which probably unfairly hurt shanahan
by quincyyyyy on Jan 2, 2009 8:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I hope so
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 2, 2009 11:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No good potential head coach would be stupid enough be to JJ's hand-puppet.
Jimmie Johnson and Bill Parcells were both promised autonomy. JJ reneged, and both HCs left prematurely.
Wharter
by Wharter on Jan 2, 2009 7:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
With Parcells he left because he was sick of coaching
it had nothing to do with what you are talking about.
by quincyyyyy on Jan 3, 2009 9:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
sick of putting 110% effort into a season to just get dissappointed in the end
What the French?! Toast!
by thebigham on Jan 3, 2009 9:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You failed to include the Jimmy Johnson issue. JJ got his feelings hurt at an NFL
ensemble when Johnson wouldn’t include him in a small gathering of former friends and colleagues.
JJ, for all intents and purposes, called a press conference and announced to the world, that he, JJ, could win a SB with almost anyone at the HC position.
Jimmy Johnson, being a bit of an egotist himself, called JJ’s bluff.
As to Parcell’s exit: if he was sick of coaching, why did he taking the Miami GM position so suddenly?
Wharter
by Wharter on Jan 3, 2009 9:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
suddenly?
it was over a year later, and, my friend, he’s not coaching. He’s VP of Football Operations, which I"m almost sure isn’t Head Coach. Ask Tony Sparano.
by Joey2zs on Jan 3, 2009 12:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the tone for a franchise is set at the top
something that is seriously lacking in dallas, Parcells will probably be executive of the year…..Who do you think put the team together….
by Deke on Jan 3, 2009 12:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Deke, They needed someone to 'splain it to them.
Wharter
by Wharter on Jan 3, 2009 3:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why did Parcells join?
If it is the case that Jerry is too hands on and the whole world knows about it, why did Parcells join in the first place? Parcells is too strong of a character to be hoodwinked by Jerry. Furthermore, Holgrem likes Jerry. Seems like Jerry isn’t as detestable as the fans say he is.
People will then say that Jerry didn’t let Parcells have too much say over the personnel decisions. One of the criticisms of Jerry is that he dictates what coaches do. This implies that people expect that one should do his own job and one not stick his fingers in others’ jobs. Jerry is the GM, so Parcells should stick to his coaching job.
Anyway, if we had won that Seattle game, Parcells may still be coaching us now.
by ym on Jan 2, 2009 10:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dallas Mock Draft:
2. Kevin Ellison – S – 6’1" – 224 – USC
3. Antoine Caldwell – OC – 6’3" – 305 – Alabama
4. Jason Phillips – ILB – 6’1" – 237 – TCU
4. Troy Kropog – OT – 6’6" – 298 – Tulane
5. Jaimie Thomas – OG – 6’4" – 332 – Maryland
5. George Hypolite – DT – 6’1" – 285 – Colorado
6. Corvey Irvin – DT – 6’3" – 289 – Georgia
7. Wopamo Osaisai – CB – 5’11" – 198 – Stanford
by tyler2 on Jan 2, 2009 8:59 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
D-......back to the drawing board guy..
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
by BoyzRback on Jan 2, 2009 10:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No back-up (or replacement) for Romo?
Wharter
by Wharter on Jan 3, 2009 5:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dom Capers
Has anyone read anywhere that Dom Capers is coming to the ’Boys as a consultant?
I don’t know why we would need a consultant with Brian Stewart on board. He was in the college ranks as a coach for 9 years. Got into the NFL through some form of league ‘affirmative action’ program. Then 2 years with Houston as an assistant DB coach. 3 years with the Chargers as a DB coach under Wade and then he gets the Defensive Coordinator job at one of the premier franchises in the most competitive sports league in the world.
Wade really wanted the guy and lobbied hard to get him, and perhaps he’s brilliant. But he sure looked lost and scared on the sidelines, apparently Wade had to intervene midway through the season and start calling plays for Stewart, and now I’m hearing rumors that the Cowboys are thinking of bringing in a defensive consultant.
I am a shareholder in a well known company with great prospects. OK, so this company hires an ‘expert’ to run a key part of our business. We know that he’s comparatively new to the professional end of the industry and has zero experience in this new and much more demanding position. We pass up other, more experienced guys…but we hire this fellow.
His first year in the job wasn’t great, but the company did so well in another segment (offense) of the business that his weaknesses were not as glaring. His second year in the business was not mitigated by resounding success in other segments and he began to look like he was struggling, and midway through the year, the General Manager of the company stepped in and made many of the decisons for this employee, and there was a noticeable improvement. However, it seems this may have distracted the GM from his other duties and the company underperformed against expectations.
Now, the General Manager is apparently discussing bringing in a consultant to provide additional help. during the next year.
As a shareholder of this company, which did not have the kind of profitable year we were all expecting, I have to ask myself if the salary that we are paying this executive is providing us with a return on our investment.
Well?
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams
by Jim Vance on Jan 2, 2009 9:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Jerry wanted Dom and Wade didn't. A year later, Stewart has been exposed and Jerry is bring in Dom.
by CHARB on Jan 2, 2009 10:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no wade wanted dom
and Stewart didn’t
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 2, 2009 11:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wade couldn't hire Dom because Stewart didn't want him?
Isn’t Wade the Head Coach?
Sorry my mistake, I used Wade and Head Coach in the same sentence.
by CHARB on Jan 3, 2009 12:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Stewart said
He wouldn’t be comfortable. Wade respected his feelings.
We should fire Stewart and hire Dom
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 3, 2009 1:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My memory
says “Capers was the one that respected Stewart’s uncomfort with him(Capers) coming in”
Which now makes complete sense, if I was Stewart and knew my own incompetence, I would have been “uncomfortable as well”
by WestTxHornFan on Jan 3, 2009 1:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I said the very same thing at the time.....Jerry should have insisted on it....
The fact that Stewart cost us Capers still friggin gives me heartburn….
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
by BoyzRback on Jan 3, 2009 5:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Lets not forget at the beginning of this season there was a very real chance Belicheat
was going to get suspended. The Pats were hedging their bets with Capers knowing he could step in for the cheater if he had to miss any time. Would you rather be under Phillips and stewey or have the possibility of being thrown the keys to the whole pats team that had just gone 17-1 or whatever it was. Capers was lookin out for Capers not steweys feelings.
Don't believe everything you think.
Your causes are cute!!!
by stoproyce on Jan 3, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Brian Stewart is the Scapegoat?
I think you should read the DMN news article December 20, 2008. In that article Wade says that (paraphrase) We have a game plan and we are getting the calls we want called. The article goes on further to say that Wade has a headset and knows what all the defensive calls are and has veto power over any of the defensive calls that are made. The game plan, according to the article, further states that calls were scheduled beforehand for certain down and distance situations.
Also, I must question the “affirmative action” reference concerning Stewart. The man coached at both the college and porofessional level for 14 years. He knew Wade’s defense because he worked with him previously. Yet in your mind he got into the league because of affirmative action? The NFL’s affirmative action policy refers to INTERVIEWING minorities for HEAD coaching positions, not assistants.
The bottom line is Stewart as the defensive coordinator is averaging 11 regular season wins a year. Every fan, including myself, wanted the team to be more successful. However, your criticism seems to be tinged with something other than an objective viewpoint.
by jevans1729 on Jan 4, 2009 12:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Only question I got for that is....Where did you hear Capers is once again being considered as a consultant ?????
post links please…..cuz that other dribble doesn’t pay credence to the news you offer..
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
by BoyzRback on Jan 2, 2009 10:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yes Sir!
I don’t have a link because I heard it on the radio with two guys talking I didn’t recognize I don’t know if they were only rehashing last years rumor, or if it was surfacing again.
As you may have noticed early in the post, I was asking the question to see if anyone else had ‘read’ that Capers was indeed back under consideration. Then, under the premise that it was being considered, I made my point about Stewart’s lack of qualification to be a Defensive Coordinator. Strictly my opinion.
Then you call my opinion dribble, which I presume you meant drivel.
Here are 7 definitions of the word drivel. I’d like to know which one you feel best represents my opinion?
driv⋅el /ˈdrɪvəl/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [driv-uhl] Show IPA Pronunciation
noun, verb, -eled, -el⋅ing or (especially British) -elled, -el⋅ling.
–noun
1. saliva flowing from the mouth, or mucus from the nose; slaver.
2. childish, silly, or meaningless talk or thinking; nonsense; twaddle.
–verb (used without object) 3. to let saliva flow from the mouth or mucus from the nose; slaver.
4. to talk childishly or idiotically.
5. Archaic. to issue like spittle.
–verb (used with object) 6. to utter childishly or idiotically.
7. to waste foolishly.
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams
by Jim Vance on Jan 2, 2009 10:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm guessing #4
But it wasn’t drivel or dribble. It would be good news IMO, then you have Wade’s successor on hand if Red takes off.
by Doomsday on Jan 2, 2009 11:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Strongly disagree
I’m feeling #2
:o)
In-YOUR-endo
by accidental innuendo on Jan 2, 2009 11:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm
As long as he’s not making fun of my saliva/mucous problem, I’m OK
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams
by Jim Vance on Jan 2, 2009 11:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
lol...actually #2 covers it....meaningless talk....seeing that there has been no recent reports of Capers once again considering a consultant job...
I surely agree with agree with the basis of your post though……Stewart NEVER should have been named DC to begin with….He’s a high energy guy, that has some promise in the future….but our future is now, and we don’t need amatuers running our defense OR OFFENSE !!!!
A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.
President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -
by BoyzRback on Jan 3, 2009 5:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Marty Ball
This story was on Wikipedia about Marty Schottenheimer and why he was fired from San Diego. Apparently, Marty felt Wade was expendable there.
"Schottenheimer was abruptly fired by San Diego on February 12, 2007. Reasons for his firing include a strained relationship with general manager A.J. Smith, which reached a breaking point when 4 assistants (Cam Cameron, Wade Phillips, Rob Chudzinski and Greg Manusky) left for positions with other teams. It should be noted that these coaches left to pursue higher level opportunities with other teams, instead of merely making a lateral move to another team in which they would be doing the very same thing they were doing at San Diego.
Jim Trotter, of the San Diego Union Tribune, also believes that Schottenheimer’s insistence that his brother, Kurt Schottenheimer, replace Phillips as the defensive coordinator further strained the relationship between team president Dean Spanos and Schottenheimer."
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams
by Jim Vance on Jan 2, 2009 10:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
From what I understand.
Marty wanted to hire his brother to replace Wade after he got the Dallas job, and AJ wanted someone else.
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
by Wmillion on Jan 3, 2009 1:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
OK, makes sense about Marty and his bro.
I think what is bothering me about Stewart, and Wade is that in my opinion, the Defensive Coordinator position for the Dallas Cowboys is not the place for ‘on-the-job-training’. We needed someone who had the chops and had the ability to make an immediate impact on the quality of the D units play.
Garrett, while a first time OC did make an immediate impact in his first year. The Offense exploded with production. It was Garrett’s outstanding job that was the deodorant for the D and the Special Teams play in 2007.
We all assumed that Garrett and his group would remain stellar through 2008, while the play of the D and ST improved. It looked like a sure formula for the Super Bowl. The offense stumbled in 2008, partly through injuries and partly through the expertise of great football minds in opposing D coordinator jobs. Garrett seemed outmatched and out schemed at times.
We thought we pulled in most of the missing components on the defense via free agency (Zach) and the draft (Jenkins and Scandrick) or the police blotter (Pacman). We knew Safety was still a concern but Thong was saying all the right things. At the same time, ST play was bad in 2007 and showed no real improvement in 2008.
The defense could not seem to come together in the first half of the 2008 campaign and we all wondered if this squad would ever reach it’s potential. (I remember seeing a TV shot of Stewart, the camera was actually focused on Wade, but Stewart just looked wide eyed and hyper.) It was at that point I started to think, “This guy really looks like he doesn’t know what to do.”
I continued to think that we still didn’t have the right players on D, until I saw them really pick it up while Wade was more involved. Wade’s helping Stewart and showing marked improvement in the play of the defensive unit was the biggest indictment of Stewart’s lack of ability. I think that maybe if Wade had taken over responsibility for that D unit in 2007, we might be looking now at a significantly better defense than we have. All speculation and drivel according to some, but still my opinion.
The compound effect of Stewart’s ‘OJT’ is that the Head Coach had to basically step in and do his job, and in doing so, the HC apparently neglected ST again, and was not able to impact the offense’s struggles.
So, to sum up, then I’ll shut up…I think Wade is a great defensive mind, he’s proven it many times. As a head coach, he has made some glaring errors in judgement. Read and Stewart. Garrett showed that he can make an immediate impact and he got a major league lesson in adaptability and adjustment, this year. I believe he will be back, I hope he stays.
Any manager can make a bad hire. He compounds that mistake when he thinks he can save that bad hire and make that bad hire into something he is not. At some point you have to recognize that plow horse you have is never going to compete in the Kentucky Derby. One measure of a manager (HC) is if he has the ability to recognize his mistakes and then have the strength to correct them. I’m willing to give Wade credit for seeing that special teams was bad and didn’t look like it was going to get any better under the current coach. I’m still waiting to see if he can make the emotionally hard decision of recognizing that his protege is not ready to be the Defensive Coordinator of the Dallas Cowboys.
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams
by Jim Vance on Jan 3, 2009 7:41 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'll agree with most of that
That problem as I see it is that no one actually expected Stewart to be an actual D-coordinator in anything but name. I think most everyone assumed that Wade would be taking care of the D, including calling the plays, when he came here. I’m not positive but I thought Raf posted at his old site when we hired Wade that Wade even talked about how he would never hand over the reigns to his D again. That he had done that once (with Denver maybe?? when Charlie Waters was the D-coordinator??) and it had reflected badly on him and he wouldn’t do it again.
That’s why when I found out Stewart was actually calling the plays I was shocked. What’s the point of hiring a defensive “guru” to implement his version of the 3-4 D if he’s not going to call the plays?? I’m still kind of shocked.
by kameleon_o on Jan 3, 2009 11:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You may be right...
But if Wade is the defacto Defensive Coordinator, why spend Jerry’s money on an empty sweat suit like Stewart? I don’t understand the need for the charade. Like Tex says, just call Stewart the hostess who gets Wade his coffee, and call Wade the Head Coach/Defensive Coordinator.
Better yet, get rid of Stewart and bring over one of the cheerleaders to fulfill his duties. No drop off in expertise but much better looking AND adds to the circus atmosphere.
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams
by Jim Vance on Jan 3, 2009 11:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Most coaches name someone as their coordinator
Gary Kubiak was the O-coordinator for the Broncos but Shanahan was calling the plays. I thought it would be the same here. I have no idea what Phillips was thinking by letting him call plays. That was a serious lapse in judgement.
by kameleon_o on Jan 3, 2009 5:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















