St. Louis writer(s) said that Garrett can't coach black players?!?
Now, with all the drama around the Owens/Witten/Romo/Garrett stuff, this isn't the first time that the race card has come up. Stephen A. Smith said, apparently, that black players were supporting T.O. and mentioned white players were cheered before the Giants game while T.O. was booed.
Marshall Faulk also brought up race in regards to the Cowboys' turmoil. And the topic is getting a lot of run throughout the internet as people evaluate the reporting and presentation of the Cowboys' purported chemistry concerns.
Myself and Rafael, as well, just yesterday discussed the possible perception that there is a racial component to what is going on regarding the criticism of T.O. There really isn't any way around the issue, in my mind, and it is being brought up in a number of places.
Here's a new instance of the racial dimension surrounding these matters being raised, and one I was not aware of until I read the article that containted the information by FOX Sports' John Czarnecki:
During the search process, columnists and writers for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch started revealing flaws in Garrett's résumé — basically, that he's a very young coach who hasn't won a playoff game. But when the subject came to players, it was voiced that Garrett had a difficult time coaching black players. That is such a ridiculous assertion, but it gained so much steam in St. Louis that the fans accepted it as fact. On the day that Garrett thought he had a shot at becoming the head coach, the final paragraph in a Post-Dispatch news story was that hundreds of fans called the team's ticket office to complain about a Garrett hiring.
I could not find the original piece(s) that Czarnecki was referring to from the St. Louis paper. Perhaps someone else can help out with this.
Czarnecki says that, essentially, it's Owens' fault for what happened with the St. Louis writers and fans. That's absurd, in my opinion, unless Owens personally called those writers up himself and fed them lines.
Here's my take: When you have various media outlets taking what appear to be wanton rips at a black player, saying he's jealous of a white player and essentially questioning his basic sanity by putting out that the player feels two white players are designing plays to exclude him, and when things such as Cris Carter's saying that he would put a bullet in T.O. are barely even covered, you're likely to draw a healthy dose of scrutiny from people who feel Owens is being persecuted. That's the danger of going out of your way to pillory someone to the extent that T.O. is hounded by entities like ESPN.
Thus, even if your vitriol would be just as vile towards a white or Latino player, you end up being on the defensive and scheduling Stephen A. Smith to interview T.O. for your network (with an appearnace by Michael Irvin) so as to cool off the heat. We are in a new historical era here in America and there also exists a greater level of consciousness about, and intolerance towards, what is perceived to be racially-tainted bias against people. Ask incoming Illinois Senator Roland Burris, or President Barack Obama. People are not as willing to let things pass as they might once have been, and if groups such as ESPN go too far, in some people's minds, they will hear about it. I think that's a good thing.
That having been said, I think ESPN would dislike Owens no matter what the color of his skin was. I don't think they're racist, just vindictive towards T.O. I feel the same way about guys like Peter King regarding their statements on Terrell. There are cultural differences, to be sure, between many of the media that covers pro athletes and a number of those who compete in those endeavors, but I think that a good number of the people who dislike Owens (think Carter and Keyshawn) would find fault in him regardless of his heritage.
This information on Garrett and the St. Louis job is a bombshell to me. I hadn't heard about this at all, and I don't know what to say about how real or not the "can't coach black players" supposed label is as regards Jason. However, if people both within and without the organization feel that there is something to this story or perception, then Jason Garrett--the Red Headed Genius--may be in worse shape than I thought he was, and I thought he was on pretty shaky ground to begin with following his getting dinged by several teams for their head coaching spot and after his reported 'me-or-him' ultimatum to the Cowboys about Owens (this becomes more problematic now as Garrett, by being dinged on his head coaching search, has lost his negotiating leverage with Dallas). Not to mention Romo having basically called him out following the Philly debacle, to go along with others in the locker room who aren't RHG fans. All of this, taken together with the concept that the league caught up with Garrett this year, may be why, as Czarnecki mentions, rumors that Jerry Jones wouldn't be so unhappy if Garrett were to leave began in the first place.
What do you guys think? Has anyone seen this/these supposed story/stories in the St Louis Post-Dispatch or on St. Louis radio? I knew not a thing about any of this until like two hours ago.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
0 recs |
111 comments
|
Comments
Well I guess
T.O. stands for the entire black race of players. This is laughable! His brother John seems to be doing a pretty good job of coaching black players. Funny thing is when the crowd booed T.O. that was one black player! It had nothing to do with the color of his skin. Also Tony Romo himself isn’t even white, so they can’t say the crowd was only cheering whites.
Tony Romo isn't white?
What is he if he is not white?
Tony Romo
Romo is a Second-Generation Mexican American on his father’s side and is of German and Polish descent from his mother’s side.20 His grandfather, Ramiro Romo Sr., emigrated from Múzquiz, Coahuila, Mexico to San Antonio, Texas as an adolescent. The elder Romo cites Tony’s success as an example of the possibilities afforded to immigrants in the United States: “I’ve always said this is a country of opportunities. If you don’t get a job or an education, it’s because you don’t want to.”21
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
Thanks for
the answer. I didn’t know that.
Just thinking...
If Obama can be black, why can’t Romo be white?
good question
it just seems like if you have any black in you, you are considered black.
I think the old rule as far as checking the race/origin box on something is if you are one eigth black then you have to mark African American.
Stupid.
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 23, 2009 6:47 AM CST up reply actions
Just combed through some archives in the
St Louis Dispatch sports section, even read a lot of the posts attached to the stories. Didn’t see a single mention of Garrett not being able to coach black players. Not that their fan base wasn’t distressed with the possibility of his hire, it was more along the lines of their thinking he was less qualified than the other canidates. Plus, as usual, the Cowboy bias. However, I didn’t read even a hint of what you’re talking about?
I couldn't find anything either
…though Czarnecki does say it was ‘voiced’ that Garrett had this issue, or whatever. Maybe one of the writers said it on the radio, or TV or something? Something apparently happened, if Czarnecki believes that the entire fan base began to feel this way. I don’t know anything about this which is why I’m asking others for help.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 22, 2009 6:45 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks for this, rocj55
Very cool. I favorited that. Antonio’s grandarents!
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 22, 2009 8:26 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah my mom grew up there, and so did my wife.
I grew up in alice tx, go coyotes!!!
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
My dad's family...
…is from San Antonio. That is the Mexican side of my family.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 23, 2009 8:11 PM CST up reply actions
Brian Burwell had a hatchet piece on Jan. 13th
saying Garrett was “the one unqualified candidate” on the team, citing his failure to control T.O. as one reason.
I’m guessing you’re seeing the print generation of a statement, the transformation a statement undergoes after several re-tellings — Czarnecki, in trying to say Garrett couldn’t harness T.O., comes out as he can’t handle black players.
I find it odd that Burwell tries coming off telling Garrett that he has no right interviewing for a HC job and gets exceedingly personal. Who died and made him God?
This gets me to a point that Michael Lombardi made. Garrett visited and his name was leaked. The fans apparently got irate and the Rams went in another direction.
Now, this may be pure coincidence, but Lombardi talked about the Redskins almost hiring Jim Fassell last year and how his name leaked into the media and fans turned thumbs down and voila, the team hires Jim Zorn. His point was that the Redskins shouldn’t let the public pick their coaches.
The Rams are getting lots of praise for having “football men” in control of the organization. Let’s see if they’re brilliant or buckled to public opinion on Garrett. There’s another unsubstantiated rumor that appeared in PFT that Garrett priced himself out of the Rams job.
Mike Florio bashed him for it, but how can we tell there’s any meat to it. Another way of looking at it, is that the Rams got cheap. The rumor mill on Spagnuolo had him giving poor interviews in Denver and New York, but again, when agents are trying to steer candidates this way and that, who’s to say how credible any of these storeis are.
Thanks, Rafael
My guess was that it was the Burwell piece you were referring to, and/or some other appearances Brian may have had. This is his kind of angle.
I used to like him a lot when, I believe, he wrote for the USA Today. He still does some good work and is as opinionated as ever—as was the case in the Romo piece—but I don’t seek his stuff out the same way I used to. Here’s the piece Rafael is talking about:
Jason Garrett, latest St. Louis Rams head coach candidate, isn’t ready for prime time
I read this before I made the fan post here. It seems a huge stretch for Czarnecki to claim what he is in his column off of this piece by Burwell, but I could see how that may have happened. The thing is, it’s even more of a stretch to say that the entire fan base or whatever soured on Garrett because they believed, at least based on Burwell’s piece, Garrett couldn’t coach black players. That’s ridiculous, in my opinion. It’s actually more than absurd, it would be irresponsible to put that out there on an already inflamed situation.
I want to think that there has to be more to this story, some radio and/or TV and/or other writings to back this up, what Czarnecki wrote. You should not be casually tossing out racially-tinged assertions based on such flimsy material. Why would Czarnecki do that, if that’s what he did? Is he just another T.O. hater? And if he is, why on earth would he try to say it’s T.O.‘s fault that some St Louis writer(s) supposedly inserted the race card? I don’t get it; it seems counterproductive if you’re trying to make T.O. look bad.
That is, by bringing up race you draw people’s attention to what they may feel is a reason why T.O. is taking so much heat. Perhaps Czarnecki has more information than we know, or perhaps he just wanted to take on the elephant which appears to have been in the room for some time and that others have already begun to comment on. Blaming T.O. for what a writer(s) in St Louis supposedly said, though, I don’t know if that’s going to work, especially without more proof. And that’s not even bringing up the whole ‘entire fanbase’ aspect.
Thanks, Rafael.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 22, 2009 7:23 PM CST up reply actions
Garrett wasn't hired cuz they (fans) knew of his poor play calling ability, game planning, and inability to make in game adjustments
It was well publisized throughout the football world, and quotes from Dawkins, Reed, and Lewis played a huge part in Ram’s fans thoughts…IMO
And if your team is 2-14 , and one of the victories is against the coach that’s looking to take over..It doesn’t go over well.. Would anyone have wanted 0-16 coach Rod Marinelli taking over as HC here in Dallas ??
by CowboysRnumba1 on Jan 23, 2009 3:46 PM CST up reply actions
There is something to this.
I dont think it is so extreme that I think Garrett can’t coach black players. I just think there is a component there. When the whole Witten vs. TO showdown took place, I said that players may begin to take sides, and the locker room may suffer a racial divide. Everyone ripped me for saying that, but we are starting to see clues of just that.
It would however be crazy to insinuate that since Garrett cant control TO then he cant coach black players. No one can control TO.
Sometimes it’s actually harder for black coaches to coach black players. Sometimes a black player see’s a black coach and does not necessarily view him as an authority figure, but more as a brother. Sometimes a black player expects a black coach to look out for him, and let him get away with certain things. That is a dangerous situation.
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 22, 2009 7:24 PM CST reply actions
Totally agree
…Glory. And you make a great point about the difficulty black coaches can have in coaching black players. I know exactly what you mean. Because of the history of our society sometimes black players can take the same disrespectful view of African-American coaches that others may have taken in the past. That is, they may not see them as true authority figures or as the guy who is really in charge. Or, as you also point out, the player may want the coach to understand him and his situation/background more so than, say, a white coach, and that can lead to other possible problems.
This is what I really believe happened this year, and it is just my feeling but based on looking at the totality of the reporting that came out: Players really began to feel as though Romo was off-track, with practices, the early season struggles, whatever. Remember how close T.O. and Romo were last year, and how T.O. cried and talked about Romo at the end of the season? I think that was real.
What happened this season, it seems, is that guys started to feel like Romo wasn’t mentally getting it done, or progressing, or whatever, but they began to perceive that not only wasn’t the media covering that possibility of the rich, celebrity, cute white quarterback, they were going all-out against the brash black superstar. This likely wouldn’tve been such an issue except that guys felt there really was an issue with Romo, and the stilted coverage really began to hit home as unfair and possibly biased by more than just their dislike of Owens.
I’m not saying this is what happened, but I think the players may have come to believe this, and, I have to say, I feel that some of this kind of thing did happen. Meaning that it became a little too easy to dump on T.O. and similarly too simple to believe Jess’ boyfriend and Witten. The media didn’t start waking up to the truth of how players felt until both Williams and Gurode called out Witten, and, finally, T-New made his ‘coward’ statement at the end of the season. Plus, of course, the choke job in Philly. That’s when the whole ‘charismatic’ T.O. like Czarnecki parrots here began to really take shape.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 22, 2009 7:37 PM CST up reply actions
Edit
“when the whole ‘charismatic’ T.O. concept like Czarnecki parrots here began to really take shape.”
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 22, 2009 7:40 PM CST up reply actions
i dont know
The media really hinders any type of healing process. Under normal circumstances I would say that this could be resolved. But it is going to take this team enduring something awful together. I hope that the past season can be that galvanizing experience.
The damn media just digs and digs. They just keep throwing gas on the fire. I don’t know.
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 22, 2009 10:37 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks for the reply...
If there is one thing I wish for this teams’ 09 season its that they learn to ignore/dismiss the media and handle their problems behind the curtain instead of letting the media guide them to distraction once again.
co-sign
Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/
by silverblue5 on Jan 22, 2009 11:55 PM CST up reply actions
Jerry really needs to put a limit on media coverage if he wants any harmony within this team..
sources or no sources, players actually read the papers, take on an opinion, worry about turncoat teammates, and the stories or rumors become amplified in the locker room discussions and can alter their own internal beliefs or thoughts on the team or other players..sorta like it’s done here on this site alone….altering peoples thoughts of Wade, Garrett, TO, Romo, Witten. etc. etc…
by CowboysRnumba1 on Jan 23, 2009 3:57 PM CST up reply actions
GreatArticle
finally an article that goes straight to heart of the issue that is confronting the dallas cowbos. it ’s a double standard on the cowboys, brian stewart who has his playcalling duties removed because of lack of playcalling experience is fired, while the RHG who also lacked playcalling experience, is continuing his internship as offensive coordinator, and given job interviews. the RGH not using felix jones in the first deadskins game; deion on nfl network after the bengals game stating that nfl coordinator around the league have caught up with the RHG offensive scheme. TO discuss the RHG offensive scheme struggles to Deion on NFL Network. Deshea Townsend of pittsburgh steelers stating that defensive coordinator dick lebeau knew the cowboys formation prior to his intercepting romo for the game clinching td. ray lewis, stating after the ravens beat the cowboys on nfl network that preparing during the week for the cowboys was easy because of the simple (vanilla) of the offensive scheme. Romo after the ravens game stated it took the RHG almost 4 quarters to figure out the ravens defenisve scheme was not prepared for in-game adjustments. After the iggles game Romo again questioned the offensive scheme of the RHG. Not a peep from the dallas media regarding brian stewart ,but once TO exposed the RHG, the witch hunt by the dallas media to make TO the scapegoat, especially jennifer engle, gil lebarton, etc instead of exposing the RHG for what he is a fraud and into his internship. If the players on the team see this double standard, it explains why this franchise is disfyunctional. Media outlets like ESPN refuse to let up on TO because TO exposed ed werdner for what he is a reporter who is always trying to stir up the pot on TO to make a story and when TO fails to take the bait, ed goes to the janitor, water boy, RHG for a story line to undercut TO, which is what the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram and the Dallas Morning News is doing to increase circulation and revenue from advertisers. People like Peter King and John whatever his name is for FOX have been given a pass in their career when it comes to their perception of the black athletes and most of the time have low standard of them and what the black athlete to smile, shuffle feet, speek unless spoken too, and stay in your place, while the face of the nfl is a white athlete(peyton manning) when the nfl is 80% black. these sport writer failed to expose the system for what it is. for instance manning, brady are good because they are surrounded by outstanding black players in key positions and they both stay in an offensive system that maxiumize their talents. Whereas a jarmarcus russell, dante cullpepper, jason cambell, doug williams, brian leftwich had to go through several different offensive coordinator learning a new system everytime, therefore their skill suffers from learning a new system. the only black qb to have the same comfort zone as manning and brady is mcnabb with reid 10 years, but mcnabb has only had a quality receiver onces in his entire career in 2004 and that was TO and the iggles lost to the pats, who probably cheated to win that game. The media takes a head in the sand approach in regards to the quarteback situation in the nfl when it comes to the black and white athlete. Thanks for writting this post, it was very informative and hopefully open up the eyes of fans.
Completely wrong
Stewart was stood down because he was running the offense of Wade and doing a poor job. The D was struggling so we had the guy who designed it step in. JG was running his own offense and had nobody in a position of authority to him who could step in and start calling plays. On top of that, our offense was not struggling any where near as badly as our defense and removing him of his duties was not called for.
On Manning and Brady and comaparing them to guys like Campell and Russell. Maybe the reason they have had more success is purely because they are better qbs. Race doesnt have anything to do with it. And to suggest that the only reason Manning and Brady are any good is because they are surroundded by black players is just plain wrong. The reason they are so good is because they are extremely talented and are surrounded with a group of very good black and white athletes.
On Manning being the ‘face’ of the NFL, while I dispute that, the reason he is everywhere in the media is his charasmatic prsonality and the fact he is one of the two best players at the NFL’s glamour position. To see black leaders of teams look at guys like Ray Lewis or Troy Polamalu. These guys donmt just smile and shuffle their feet, which by the way is another outrageous accusation.
Every single one of your posts has been about how black athletes are discriminated against. How about you come here and talk football instead of diluting numerous threads with complaints about how the whole NFL, media and society are part of a conspiracy to make it harder for black athletes.
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 22, 2009 8:03 PM CST up reply actions
I have to back Dallas up here
And I am not a person to go around shouting ‘race!’
As I put in my post below regarding ProFootballTalk, there definitely exists the desire to take certain black superstars down. Not saying that this isn’t the case with certain white stars, either (think Roger Clemens and Mark McGwire), but there is often more zeal in going after guys like Vick, or Bonds. I think this has to do with cultural differences. Some old fogey sportswriters can’t stand the showmanship of certain younger players and they seem to enjoy having them embarrassed, or humiliated.
I’ll give you a good example of this: When PacMan was suspended from the league, he decided he wanted to do a stint in professional wrestling. The outcry that this ‘menace’ that the NFL just suspended should be able to earn a solid living and get notoriety was extreme. The people who wanted to ‘get’ PacMan didn’t want him rehabilitated or punished, they wanted him totally shut down and censored. It was ugly, and I remember it pretty well. You can’t do that, or should not. Go and look up the stuff Jack Johnson, the boxer, used to have to deal with because he was a black boxer beating white fighters. They got him on some BS prostitutes across state lines garbage because they wanted to take the arrogant black guy down. This kind of stuff does happen, even today. It’s subtler, but it does happen. And again, I’m a guy who was not an Obama supporter and I was routinely called ‘racist’ and other nonsense. So I know there’s plenty of false fires out there, but there’s still a lot of this distasteful stuff that occurs in our society. And plenty of it gets focused through the lens of sport.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 22, 2009 8:17 PM CST up reply actions
I understrand that there are difficulties for black athletes that white athletes dont face.
However my problem with Dallas 1966’s comments is that they are just as if not more blatently racist. Claiming black athletes are required not to speak unnless they are spoken to and just smile, and that Manning and Brady are only good because they are surrounded by black atheltes are not correct.
I respect your opinion and understand where youre coming from, the comment I responded to was racist and implied the only underlying factor in NFL decisions is race.
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 22, 2009 8:41 PM CST up reply actions
Good point
I don’t agree that Manning and Brady are only good because they are surrounded by black athletes. I understand what Dallas is saying, that others guys help to establish the reputation of guys like Manning and Brady.
Similarly, the reference to ‘speak when spoken to’ is an exaggeration for effect. It’s an allusion to times in the nation’s history when such actions were publicly expected of African-Americans. Unfortunately, that mentality does still exist in some corners, if not in such an extreme sense.
What you’re saying is correct, though, literally. And I agree with you. I thought Dallas made some really good points, and cited a lot of good examples from the Cowboys’ season. I think that sometimes when you’re aware of a bias and others are not, or don’t want to be, you can kind of oversell your points when presenting them to others. There is truth, I feel, in what Dallas is saying, but the exact wording might not be literally correct.
All of that being said, I am with you and others on players—and people—being judged on their capabilities and nothing else. As anyone who has played much basketball could tell you, some people will assume you’re an inferior player if you are white. That’s stupid, just as it’s stupid to think blacks can’t be top-flight quarterbacks, or thinking quarterbacks, or pocket passers, etc. This stuff does still go on, as the issue McNabb had with the NAACP guy (or William Rhoden and some of his stuff) shows.
I’ve always liked your posts, aussie. Thanks for commenting. You know I’m not trying to take you to task, personally. You made good points. I’m just trying to elaborate on where I think Dallas is coming from.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 22, 2009 9:46 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks
I appreciate your civil mediation. I understand where you are coming from, and now I think better understand what Dallas 1966 is saying.
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 22, 2009 10:42 PM CST up reply actions
You're all class, Aussie
Thanks very much for your calm, considered thinking.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 22, 2009 11:15 PM CST up reply actions
Also you want to talk faces of the league
I consider him to be one of the big faces of the league, and not a guy “who speaks only when spoken to.” I think why sports writers and media seem to come down harder on black athletes especially T.O. because they tend to be more in your face arrogant than most white players. Also Paul made a good point of cultural differences. In the case of Vick the media perception of him being considered a thug so when he got in trouble legally they called for his head.
Thanks, Dallas
…I appreciate your kind words.
You bring up a lot of good points. Let me just say this to start with: I’m not a Brian Stewart fan, as least as DC. I just don’t think he did a good job. And that’s how guys should be evaluated, not because they have nice nicknames like RHG, but are they getting the job done. I don’t think Stewart did. But I’m also not sure RHG did, either, and he should be looked at just as Stewart was. Maybe that was part of the point of Burwell’s piece — it’s not about nicknames or perceptions, it’s can you get the job done.
All the citations you make about guys around the league saying how vanilla the ‘Boys offense was this year really hits home. I had forgotten some of that. I like RHG, and said not too long ago that I would be good with bringing him back. However, the "me or him stuff with T.O., if it’s true, was a bit much for me and others in the organization may have felt the same way. Jason regressed this year, or such is the apparent common wisdom around the NFL. That means he probably shouldn’t be getting into power struggles with the team’s top playmaker, no matter how much Ed Werder or anyone else wants to pile on.
I do think a kind of Romo/Witten (and/or his agent)/Garrett ‘cabal’ formed this season. Not saying that one shouldn’tve formed or there wasn’t a legitimate reason for this faction to feel it had to protect itself or whatever. But this dovetailed with what groups like ESPN wanted, and foster. Same with many local media. And I think that when the T.O. part of the locker room realized how persistent and consistent this group was with getting its message out (some of which may have little to do with them and a lot to do with ESPN, …), they hardened against it. Hence the calling out of Witten by Gurode and Williams. I think the Garrett faction thought people would peel off of T.O.‘s side but just the opposite happened and now we have the ’charismatic’ T.O. stories everywhere. To be clear, I absolutely believe this is as much the Garrett faction’s fault, if not more so, than T.O. and his group. Yes, T.O. was dumb to talk to Deion and complain, but he didn’t call out any players. He basically called out Garrett. Yet when Werder-Gate broke T.O. was tarred and feathered and everyone piled on. And when T.O. spoke, the team was 5-4 and struggling with Romo out, I think. What were they before the Giants game? A lot better, and looking ot make the playoffs.
You also make great points about Romo likewise calling out RHG. Again, stuff I forgot. But it’s been there all the time. Coverage of that? Scant, if at all.
I want to say this: One guy who stood up for Brian Stewart was JJT. He said what Wade did with him was wrong. I have to give JJT that.
The rabidness with which some in the local media assail T.O. is disturbing. Really offensive. One of the articles I link to above by a black internet writer points out how casually JFE rips Owens. My own mind goes to Mac Engel and one rubbish piece he typed when Owens did well and Witten did not. You could see the foaming at the mouth through the monitor. Peter King is a jerk, a punk. He’s a clown that got ripped for writing about his own daughter incessantly in his marathon columns in the past until something happened with her, some incident, and he stopped talking about her. Something like that. The amount of hate he has for Owens is ridiculous, but it’s also fairly common. Again, widely different cultural backgrounds and you wish Pete could reign it in somewhat. I wonder how he felt about Moss until Moss went to his beloved Pats? Tell me the next time T.O. hits a cop with his car, ok?
The NFL is much more inclined to lock down the individuality of its players than is, say, the NBA. This is a longstanding debate, the merits or lack of same regarding this policy. There is a seemingly insatiable desire to ‘get’ certain stars, like Mike Vick. The entire reason why PFT is so popular is what Florio did with the Vick case, how he covered it, and broke down legal avenues for parties to pursue with Vick (including Atlanta with its own contract, and the league). That was the situation that really put PFT on the map. Florio knows it, too, which is why he has his “days since last arrest” feature. He understands, and milks, the dynamics.
You make a good point about McNabb and other black QB’s. I’m not a McNabb fan, and there is a whole separate ‘good black guy’ vs ‘bad black guy’ thing that the media loves to play out regarding him and Owens. This also ties into McNabb/Limbaugh and McNabb/NAACP guy. All these little microdramas that are there under the surface. T.O. gets pulled into these things because of his history with McNabb and because T.O. is your quintessential brash black athlete guy. It’s sad, but true. That doesn’t mean T.O. doesn’t create his own headaches. He does. But his rap sheet is shorter than Plaxico’s, Moss’, Marvin Harrison (it looks like) and many others. But that doesn’t matter, it seems.
I love T.O. I used to dislike him but I respect him now and really appreciate his drive to succeed. And you always know he’ll show up when the big game comes, boos or cheers. He’s a warrior, and he can be in my foxhole anytime.
Thanks for you thoughtful response, Dallas.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 22, 2009 8:08 PM CST up reply actions
Excellent work Paul....
I love T.O. I used to dislike him but I respect him now and really appreciate his drive to succeed. And you always know he’ll show up when the big game comes, boos or cheers. He’s a warrior, and he can be in my foxhole anytime
+1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
Me and many other fans here would jump right in that fox hole with you and TO..
I bet everyone, or many or some had these thoughts at one time….
Disliked or couldn’t stand him,
Grew to appreciate and respect his play here,
started to embrace TO,
grew to like TO, and the play making ability, all while being a model player,
started to love TO,
have had enough of the drama perceived to be brought on by TO,
actually think his abilities are regressing,
can’t stand TO,
looking foward to him being cut.
Not me, I know TO is a vital cog to this offense and team, and want to see him to retire here, and go into the Hall of Fame as a Dallas Cowboy.
I love me some TO.
by CowboysRnumba1 on Jan 23, 2009 4:29 PM CST up reply actions
+1
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 23, 2009 6:45 PM CST up reply actions
"I love me some TO."
Amen, my friend!
Thanks for stopping by and for your kind words
thumbs up
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 23, 2009 8:12 PM CST up reply actions
Brian Stewart was removed because he was incompentant and The head coach is a genius as a
D-coordinator. And it was also the black players on the defense who thought he sucked as well. I guess Demarcus Ware is a racist.
On the otherhand who is going to replace Garrett if he was fired? Ray Sherman? That guy already flamed out as a O-coordinator. We were in a position with Stewart where we had one of the best d-coordinators in the league as our head coach.
Furthermore, Garrett had a good season as a coordinator last year, and Brian Stewart didn’t. If Garrett has a second bad year like Stewart did I can promise you he’ll be gone.
As for Quarterbacks the media loves McNabb. Your logic makes no sense whatsoever.
The only area in football where racism is present is in college where there is obviously racist attitudes among the alumni towards black head coaches. Other than that I think you are just looking for excuses.
+1
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 22, 2009 9:11 PM CST up reply actions
Let me ask you a question
How would the black players treat a gay player?
The gay community has it sooooooooo much worse in organized sports than blacks. You have absolutely no clue. So stop whining, you have nothing to complain about.
As far as I'm concerned Skip Bayless was spot on about Aikman.
Im sure that a gay player would have it rough in the league
but to say “You have absolutely no clue” and “stop whining” is a little insensitive.
I think you are undermining a lot of people’s hardships when you make comments like that.
I would never tell a gay person to “stop whining.”
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 23, 2009 6:51 AM CST up reply actions
"Rough" is the understatement of the year
considering how the brothers of the down-low are treated in their own community.
Black individuals have comparatively no hardships in the league right now. And if there is it is extremely slight. I’m not denying there used to be barriers for African Americans in sports, but that is not the case anymore. So when I see someone making tens of millions of dollars who is loved by most the media (like McNabb) complain about how hard he has it it just makes me want to gag.
Tim Hardaway’s reaction John Amaechi coming out would be the reaction of a lot of football players. It would be exceedingly difficult for any openly gay player to be treated respectfully by many of their own teammates.
As far as I'm concerned Skip Bayless was spot on about Aikman.
Wow
I dont know what it is like to be gay, and you dont know what it is like to be black.
Im not gonna sit here and argue about who has it worse. I gave respect to your struggle, but you’re just gonna downplay mine. That’s cool.
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 23, 2009 7:27 PM CST up reply actions
You didn't read what I wrote
I’m giving your community all the props in the world for overcoming what you guys have overcome. But I’m talking about the present. At the present it is not even close. Gays have it waaaaaaaay worse off RIGHT NOW. The black community has nothing to complain about in the NFL RIGHT NOW.
I just find it so hypocritical that people like Steven A. Smith sees any bad thing that happens to a black individual as being motivated by racism, but if he would only look in the mirror he would see how his own community treats the gay African Americans, and how it makes it almost impossible for an openly gay individual to play in the NFL. If Steven A. really cared about discrimination he would speak up about that, but he doesn’t because he would rather play the victim.
As far as I'm concerned Skip Bayless was spot on about Aikman.
Steven A. Smith bothers the hell out of me too.
As does Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. All three of them are embarrassing. I can’t stand when people jump to the race card without even knowing the entire story.
But to say that blacks have no problems in the NFL right now is just not being honest.
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 23, 2009 8:50 PM CST up reply actions
question
What does your signature mean?
As far as I’m concerned Skip Bayless was spot on about Aikman.
"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"
In his book "Hell Bent"
Bayless accused Aikman of being gay.
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 24, 2009 12:57 AM CST up reply actions
Isn't that a straw man argument?
I mean, how many gay athletes have there ever been in pro sports? Even those who keep quiet. Can’t really compare to black athletes aree what they went though in the 40s-60s.
That said, I think your name and signature line are fabulous!
No your's is a straw man argument
I’m not comparing black athletes of yesteryear and gay athletes of today. I’m comparing black athletes of today and gay athletes of today. And there is a lot more gay athletes in professional sports than you realize because the vast majority of them do keep quiet for fear of retribution.
That said, I think your name and signature line are fabulous!
Thanks honey.
As far as I'm concerned Skip Bayless was spot on about Aikman.
PLEASE READ *******
Tread lightly here. some people have already posted some questionable comments on this thread that I had to delete. If you want to discuss it civilly like the guys above are doing, fine. But if this thread spins out of control I’ll just lock it down.
+1
We all gotta walk on egg shells with this one.
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 22, 2009 10:39 PM CST up reply actions
Sure thing, Dave
Understood. I knew this could be a challenging topic but when I saw Czarnecki’s piece I felt it should be brought up. I hope I’m handling my posts ok and I urge others to please be restrained in their comments, as well. If you’re not sure if something should be written, then perhaps it shouldn’t or maybe the words could be rephrased. We all have feelings and need to do our best to respect others and their opinions, at least ones honestly and tactfully presented.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 22, 2009 10:42 PM CST up reply actions
"I hope I’m handling my posts"
You are actually being very level headed, unbiased and insightful. Keep it up
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 22, 2009 10:44 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks, Aussie
I have total respect and empathy for what Dave’s saying, and he’s right. Not everyone is going to express his/her opinions about this kind of topic in a way befitting of BTB at every moment, and that’s not fair to the site. If I have a bad day tomorrow (or a bad next hour), I might be the one out of line. I’m certainly not singling anyone out or putting myself above that category.
What Dave brings up is why I first was taken with the story. Does Czarnecki have more evidence than the Burwell column with which to base his assertion on? I have no idea. I hope he does, however, or else he’s placing a gallon of gasoline on a situation that would better be served by an extinguisher.
On the other hand, Czarnecki may be dead-on with what he’s saying and that would raise real questions about what was being said by St Louis Post-Dispatch writers. Garrett should not have his name dragged through the mud in this way publicly, at least unless someone (a source) has the guts to say this on the record, which I very much doubt.
Again, just tying this up: Grizz raises legitimate concerns with being flippant when discussing racial issues. I wish that whoever is behind this report by Czarnecki—either himself or the St Louis writers—would show the same gentleness with the topic that Grizz is now. If someone, directly, wants to come on the record and say such things about either Garrett or Owens, ok. Until then, IMO, saying that Owens was happy or fostered the idea that RHG isn’t great at dealing with certain players or else that Garrett can’t coach certain players is simply not responsible, IMO. As this thread shows, such language and ideas can cause people real consequences and generate very ill will.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 22, 2009 11:00 PM CST up reply actions
setting it straight
my point is that the playing field is not level. for instance on the manning and brady concept, if you look close you will see that they flourished in a system that max their talents. manning has had the same offensive coordinator since he came into the league in 1998, Tom Moore. Brady had the same offensive coordinator for the first 6 years of being in the league in Charlie Weis, then the patroits went in-house with josh mcdaniels who learned from weis, the system remain the same. When I mentioned russell, cullpepper, campell, leftwich, my point was that they too was number one draft picks, but most or all had to go through several coaching changes and different offensive coordinator, therefore they had to learn a new system from that coordinator each time there was a change. Now my point on manning and brady being surrounded by gifted black player to be successful, manning all his wide receivers have been drafted in the first round (harrison, wayne, gonzales and dallas clark who happen to be white), brady, without randy moss the pats do not go 18-0, brady also had donte stallworth, defensive coordinator had to pick their posion, which left wes welker on one on one coverage throughout the 2007 season, he emphasize the short passing game because maroney was often injured for the running game, therefore brady took advantage of the defensive schemes which made welker successful. now my point with mcnabb, been in reid system since 1999, the only time mcnabb was effective was in 2004 with TO and his go to guy, plus mcnabb had westbrook and deuce staley to support the running game. since 2004, mcnabb has not had to benefits of a consistent threat at receiver and the running game as been spotty because of the various injuries to wesbrook. therefore, mcnabb supporting cast is not as good as mannings and brady. when russell, campbel, leftwich was in college they had to weapons and played in the same system to be successful, but no so in the nfl. my point regarding manning being the face of the nfl, when i say being the face, i mean making benjamins in endorsements, especially, the preminum endorsements like mastercard, do we see a randy moss doing those type of commericals, or a jarmarcus russell, or even a adrian peterson doing a commercial for mastercard, nope, but you will see manning face. when doug williams won the super bowl, madison avenue did not come running to him as a matter of fact he is not even in the hall of fame, yet he is the only black quarterback to win a superbowl and during the week of the superbowl he had to endure comparison to the great john elway of the broncos. my point regarding the mass media, you have old very conservative sport writter who perception of the black athlete is differrent from the white athlete and that’s a culture thing, that why TO is the scapegoat, when TO spoke out against the RHG offensive scheme it was taboo, but when romo talked about it the mass media started drinking the kool aid, plus romo is now taking some heat about his perception of being the quarterback of the dallas cowboys from troy aikman, now romo has to back track an say i am going to be a leader now. leaders are born not made. my point on the comparisons on stewart and garrettt, now both had no playcalling exeperience prior to coming to dallas as coordinators, my poing is that stewart was stripped and demoted to game planning by the head coach and later fired, whereas garrett was not stripped nor demoted, yet garrett is giving the opportunity to get job interviews and maintain his position, the reason why garrett flourished in 2007 was because tony sparano had his back, sparano was into his 3rd year with handling playcalling duties and knew when to make in-game adjustments and when to ultilize the running game, without sparano, garretts offensive was as plain as vanilla, defensive coordinator around the league went after it like sharks, garretts inexperience was exposed during the first deadskins game when felix jones was not used at all. it all fact about what i am saying no illusions or perception is straightforward. now for those who are in denial and want to wear rose colored glasses more power to you, but sometime the truth hurts and that is fact. the problem with the cowboys is not TO, but the perception is that he is the problem because that’s what the media is putting out there for us to believe. it’s not about race it’s about perception, the media uses race to form perception of an individual. i did not vote for obama, but i do know that he is president and he is in office for a reason, but you still have people who are in denial about that. sometimes you can’t see trees in the forrest because of the fog.
You say they're surrounded by spectacular black athletes...
But Manning and Brady’s best friends are their respective O-lines. A bunch of fat white guys (for the most part). I seriously don’t see where you’re going with that one. There are black people, white people, and latin people too. Who cares? Maybe I’m a little more ignorant about the situation, but I think Manning and Brady were awful examples…
by AikmanNailedMySis on Jan 23, 2009 7:55 AM CST up reply actions
+1
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 23, 2009 6:46 PM CST up reply actions
I agree with you to some extent
but brady and manning are poor examples. They are two players who saw nearly immediately success and THAT is why they kept their jobs/in favor with the media and fans. Its also why their coordinators didn’t change for the first few years. The other players you listed did not see anythign close to that type of success. After 2 years in their systems, you could see manning and brady were pro bowl caliber players. Thats all it took. And the patriots have actually changed coordinators a few times. Brady managed to post a great year when his best receiver was jabar gaffney, a receiver the EAGLES cut! But the other players you listed – they have all played at least some stretch of time with the same coordinator, and things haven’t clicked for them.
McNabb is the reason i agree with your point somewhat. He was a great qb through most of the 2000s and i agree that most fans haven’t truly appreciated him. Maybe it does have somethign to do with race. But heck, mcnabb took criticism from all sides – the when he tried to be more of a pocket passer, the black community criticized him for that. For some unknown reason, the guy, despite being an incredible leader and a “good guy” before the TO split up, hardly received any credit. He was in my mind one of the top 3 qbs in the league for most of this decade (not anymore though).
I don’t agree that coaches of different races are held to different standards. Say what you want, but garrett played a large role in our offensive success in 2007, and THATS why he kept his job after a poor season this year. Look at Mangini and Crennell – they held their positions for about the same amount of time, both were given ample amount fo time to work, now they’re gone.
I agree that TO is not our biggest problem, just one of many. Hes generally been a great leader for the younger players, and a lot of people on this team look up to him, but you’d never hear that from the media. And to be fair, hes said really NOTHING newsworthy for about 2 years now. yet they’re still all over him.
nice quote...so true..
the problem with the cowboys is not TO, but the perception is that he is the problem because that’s what the media is putting out there for us to believe. it’s not about race it’s about perception, the media uses race to form perception of an individual.
- dallas 1966
by CowboysRnumba1 on Jan 23, 2009 4:41 PM CST up reply actions
OK now I get that
Youre first comment just came across as a bit agressive and seemingly racially motivated. However I get what youre saying here and agree with most of your points, especially:
“it’s not about race it’s about perception”
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
final point
my last point and i will close out, why has there not been any ESPN OUTSIDE OF THE LINES reporting on jacksonville jaguars’s Matt Jones, for being caught red handed wih cocaine, and was only suspended by the nfl for 3 games or chicago bears all-pro middle linebacker brian urlacher’s domestic dispute he is having with his ex, because he dressed his young infant son in girl clothes that made his ex ferious toward urlacher. I do not see ESPN making any of these two incidents the lead story. But TO who had not had any kind of off the field incidents, get’s the lead story because TO refuses to take ed werdner bait, so what does ESPN do allow ed to take unidentified sources regarding the condition of the lockerrom and the interaction between teammates and coaches, which now has been blow out of the context. When TO exposed the RHG, that when the witch hunt began. look at the blogs that jennifer engle writes regarding black players on the cowboys, she calls them fools and idiots, but garrett is a genisus. i close my case.
Because...the Eastern Sports Patriot Network
will not allow it. They thrive on anything related to the Cowboys. It brings in the bucks, it gets hits on their website. Terrell on the other hand bought a fair amount of this on himself. He loves the spotlight (or loved, not sure anymore) and has to sleep in that bed now. You noticed how much negative press was afforded Randy Moss UNTIL he joined the Pats. Although I’m sure he didn’t change his stripes all that much, he joined a team that does the opposite of “I’m Jerry Jones. I own the Cowboys! Look at us!”. You almost never hear anything bad coming from the Patriot camp, even the Spygate crap got shoveled under the rug for the most part. JJ in his infinite wisdom has saw fit to make sure everyone pays attention to even the minutest detail when it comes to the Cowboys. So we as fans have to suffer the humiliations that most teams keep private. In addition, it creates animosity among fans of other teams for the perceived “favoritism” the Cowboys receive from the press. Go figure. I would love for any other NFL team to stand the constant scrutiny this team endures year in, year out. I don’t think they could handle it.
+1
I honestly think there are two reasons TO has more media attention than Jones.
1. He is TO. A man who has a history of very publically bringing down teams.
2. Were the Dallas Cowboys. Networks are going to focus on us much more than the Jags, because most people have such a strong opinion about our franchise
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 23, 2009 7:40 AM CST up reply actions
I agree
T.O. is one of the biggest stars in the league, and everyone has an opinion about him. Love him or hate him, there is no middle ground. (For the record, I hated him until he came to Dallas; Now I love the guy).
Same with the Cowboys. Does anybody outside of Chicago (and maybe Green Bay and Detroit) think about the Bears unless they are int he Super Bowl? Can anybody even find Jacksonville on the map? Everyone who is a football fan either loves or hates the Cowboys. The Jaguars? YYYYAAAAWWWWNNNN!!!!!
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
The selective media really pisses me off too.
And you know what, you could say it even goes beyond singling out black players. The media seems to even cater to a certain type of black player. I think the media is still made uneasy by the guys with more of a street upbringing. The Tiki Barbers and Marvin Harrisons of the league seem to be protected.
Tiki Barber was every bit the cancer in the Giants locker room, that Terrell Owens is in Dallas, but no one woul say it. Marvin Harrison’s teenage fan-choking, and gun toting incidents are swept under the rug. Larry Fitzgerald is all things great, but he’s been charged with smacking his girlfriend around, more than once.
Though these guys are threatening, they get a pass because they do not look threatening.
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 23, 2009 4:57 AM CST up reply actions
Just to clarify, are you saying TO looks threatening or that he had a steet upbringing? Or both?
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 23, 2009 7:44 AM CST up reply actions
no, not T.O.
I was trying to make separate arguments in one post.
But no T.O. is not one of those guys.
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 23, 2009 7:29 PM CST up reply actions
agreed
TO hasn’t proven to be anything resembling “threatening”, hes never been in trouble with the law to my knowledge. Yet every game the cameras focus on him when we’re losing, to see if he starts yelling and screaming at players like an “angry black man”. I’d bet most wide receivers generally are unhappy when they don’t get the ball, and if they bothered to focus on them, i think they’d find a similar situation.
I can’t even imagine what would happen if TO were to actually get in some real trouble and do something illegal like many other players in the nfl.
I disagree Glory
Espn focuses on whoever the fans want to continually focus on. Look at all of our comments if I could get through a thread without the mention of TO once in it I would be in heaven. Espn focuses on players that people want to keep talking about. It is a business and they report their news like a business. A lot of people hate TO and like him so they know both sides will want to watch a piece on him and take different opinions on him. Tiki and Marvin Harrison simply are not that entertaining. TO brings and entertainment aspect to the game with his mouth the other two do not. And Fitzgerald just goes out and makes unbelievable catches that is why he is out there on Espn. And TO is definitley not threatening have you seen those i shirts he made on hard knocks. “I catch” that really cracked me up how could he be threatening.
Fitz has been accused of domestic violence?
I did not know that. Kind of disappointing.
accused is the key word
I’ve seen many PFAs filed that have no validity to them whatsoever, just totally false allegations.
Many times they are filed by wifes or girlfriends just to gain advantage in domestic and custody litigation.
In Romo we Trust
He's a repeat offender Terry...
don’t make light of legality of it…..cops were involved, he was booked and proccessed, there has to be some merit to the claim.
That being said, I have been falsely accused on two occasions, by two different women of domestic violence ,and never laid a hand on a woman in my life…..go figure.
by CowboysRnumba1 on Jan 23, 2009 4:51 PM CST up reply actions
You know the answer to your own question
Who makes more headlines, T.O. or Matt Jones? Matt Jones barely speaks
I will give you credit there, though...
Matt Jones didn’t get suspended until the last few games of an already-finished season for the crappy Jags and the dude got caught with booger sugar in his nose and in his lap! Plus he had a bag of grass on him. That was total garbage…
by AikmanNailedMySis on Jan 23, 2009 7:58 AM CST up reply actions
booger sugar
haha never heard it called that before…
by CowboysFan4Life on Jan 23, 2009 10:38 AM CST up reply actions
Btw whatever happened with Santonio Holmes
getting caught with weed earlier in the season? I know the team suspended him for one game but so far as I know Sheriff Goodell never did anything. Did I miss something?
no he wasn't suspended by Goodell
because the team suspended him and it was his first offense,
In Romo we Trust
A lot of casual NFL fans
probably don’t know or forgot who Matt Jones is. T.O. on the other hand is as well known to the American public as Lebron James. That was a ridiculous comparison.
Sometimes the human race…
Can be so profoundly stupid that I have to wonder how we have survived as a species for as long as we have. :-/
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
I can not stand comments of race anymore
Depending on any issue at hand the issue of race is always overplayed. I think our generation has evolved to the fact that race does not play as big of an impact as it once did. The idea of equality has finally broken from the chains that held it down in America, and I believe that issues of racism are well overplayed especially by people like Steven A. Smith I can not stand the guy personally.
Stephen A. Smith is the biggest joke I've ever seen cover sports.
Everything is racial to him. If Kobe Bryant dunks, it was a way to get back at the rim for being racist… Another quality export of the wonderful city of Filthadelphia
by AikmanNailedMySis on Jan 23, 2009 2:26 PM CST up reply actions
Very disappointing . . .
to inject the issue of race into such a flimsy package of evidence—a terrible waste of pixels, and a reminder of how unreliable the internet can be—readers must be more discerning!
To read Czarnecki’s prose again, he writes: “But when the subject came to players, it was voiced that Garrett had a difficult time coaching black players. That is such a ridiculous assertion, but it gained so much steam in St. Louis that the fans accepted it as fact.”
Note that careful insertion of the passive voice—“It was voiced”—who voiced that? He referred at the beginning of the paragraph that “columnists and writers for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch” were revealing flaws in Garrett’s resume. Was it one of those “columnists and writers”? If so, why not quote them? Probably for the same reason he protects himself in the next sentence with his opinion that the charge is a “ridiculous assertion”—to avoid being sued. In the meantime, he fans the flames of a non-attributed rumor, neither quotes a columnist or writer who would have been only a secondary source, and of course makes no reference to a primary source, which would have to be someone in the Cowboys organization.
Folks, this is the definition of “yellow journalism”, the sort of journalism that if practiced by ESPN would have everyone on this board up in arms. No matter your opinion of Jason Garrett as a coach, think of the harm done to him as a person. A non-attributed rumor, written in a cowardly passive voice, with the writer protecting himself with his own denial of the charge, and yet, if the author is to be believed, “gained so much steam in St. Louis that the fans accepted it as fact.” Another blow against truth. Another reputation savaged to further someone else’s agenda or career. Shame!
Great post, NCCowboy
You put it perfectly, as did Rafael upthread. Thanks.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 23, 2009 8:15 PM CST up reply actions
I agree NC, that was a complete butcher job by this clown Czarnecki, and looks to save his own ass the whole way through.
defamation law suit should be looked into by Garrett.
+1
Czarnecki is trying to ding T.O. but he basically crushes Garrett in the process. Thanks for nothing, JC.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 23, 2009 8:16 PM CST up reply actions
I agree that a lot of people play the race card way too early.
I am not one of those people. But I dont understand why so many people dont even want to talk about race. I make no excuses in my life based on race. But for me to walk around, seeing what I see everyday, and say that racism is non-existent; I would be a liar.
We can all be mature and talk about it. We’re all adults here correct?
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 23, 2009 7:34 PM CST reply actions
+1
I’m with you all the way, Glory. We have to be respectful about it, how we talk, but it’s something that should be discussed. If for no other reason, just to show that it is not the boogeyman that it is often made out to be.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 23, 2009 8:18 PM CST up reply actions
Isn't the object
at some point not to have to talk about race when dealing with any issue? The lines between races continue to blur. Yet, the argument of race contines to be a convenient answer to way too many questions. It’s the default.
Glory, you said there was a component to the story of Garrett not being able to coach black players but never went in to specifics. You also stated the Romo-T.O. issue would turn in to a race issue inside the locker room when all T.O. wanted was the ball. How do you relate an NFL wide receiver who has a history of complaining not getting the ball enough to a racial divide in the locker room?
Unfortunately I was never big enough or fast enough to be an NFL player. But if I had been and the decision had to be made, I would have to be an idiot to side with my race. You think Demarcus Ware sides with T.O. because Witten, Roy E, Crayton and Austin are too involved in the offiense?
As far as the Romo, Witten, T.O. situation
I see it like this. Terrell Owens and Jason Witten had a disagreement in the locker room. Two men disagreed but one man was blamed, the other exonerated. When the media shredded T.O., and the crowd booed him that week coming out of the tunnel, a lot of the black players probably felt that they had to stick up for T.O. Now at some point, it becomes easy to blur the line between sticking up for a friend and actually inheriting his beef. This is where the crack develops. Guys side with T.O., people on the other end of the spectrum, see this and band together themselves. Next thing you know, your locker room is split.
I only believe this is possible because it is all I have ever seen. Every little league, high school, and college locker room I have been a part of has been literally segregated. When everything is going well, everyone gets along, but when adversity strikes, most guys retreat to their corners.
However, I did attend high school and college in Iowa, where the cultural divide is blatant, and I assume it is not that way everywhere. And I am not inside the Cowboys locker room, so I’m not saying that there is a racial divide, just that it is possible.
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 23, 2009 9:03 PM CST up reply actions
Actually now I think Carp is the source
he supposedly sucks up to Romo big time, and he is always chummy with the media. Although I don’t think we’ll every really know what happened.
I'm with you Quinc..I have long considered Barbie the source...
And he does seem to make himself available to the media at all times…Since when have any of you seen a back up LB on any team being interviewed on TV regularly, including ESPN reports? No Berger, No Hatcher, no Rogers, or Polk ?…but Barbie Carpenter sure seems to make his appearances….hmmm..
He’s one of Romo’s and Witten’s stooges, and seems to be the close to the core or common denominator of any contraversy coming out of Valley Ranch.
by CowboysRnumba1 on Jan 23, 2009 10:20 PM CST up reply actions
I never thought of that
I was wondering why the hell they keep interviewing Carpenter? Who the hell wants to hear from him?
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 23, 2009 10:57 PM CST up reply actions
Very interesting
I hadn’t thought of this possibility at all. Hmmm.
by PaulFVillarreal on Jan 24, 2009 12:48 AM CST up reply actions
and yes, I wish we didn't have to talk about race.
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 23, 2009 9:04 PM CST up reply actions
You don't have to!
When T.O. was booed, I was sick. It substantiated for me the bandwagon mantra that Cowboy fans have. I was disgusted and embarrassed to be a Cowboy fan. All I could do is mentally separate myself from those fans. It is not my opinion that T.O. had to be defended by his teammates because he was black, it was because he was their teammate and those players should be saddened and disgusted like I was, regardless of their personal feelings about him.

by 

















