Who is Tony Romo?
Is Tony the next in the line of great Dallas Cowboy QB’s (Staubach and Aikman) or is he going to leave with good, perhaps even great, stats but ultimately the frustration of unmet expectations (Danny White)?
To assess this I have tried to pull together a summary of my view of the key attributes of Romo as I see them.
He is talented
There is little doubt he has the talent. He has a history of strong personal performance, going back to Eastern Illinois (3 x 3x OVC Player of the Year (2000–2002) and Walter Payton award in 2002.
He has performed from the first game he stepped into the starter’s role. In around 2.5 seasons he has already broken several Cowboy passing records. His QB rating is phenomenal – Aikman didn't break 90 till his 5th year, Brady never had a year better than Romo's until ’07 and Peyton's didn't until his 6th year. And he made the pro bowl his first two seasons.
He is a nice guy with a calm demeanour
You don’t hear of many NFL starting QB’s changing an old couple’s tire after a game or buying a homeless person a movie ticket – and then sitting next to them! He has real character. He is not a rah-rah but I am not sure he needs to be. But the downside of this personality in a locker-room or on the field is that he likely does not hold his teammates to account enough.
He has never won a playoff game, at any level
His high-school team wasn’t good enough to ever get in the playoffs. Eastern Illinios made the playoffs each of Romo’s 3 years as a starter but lost each time. In 2001 they lost narrowly despite a 5-TD effort from Romo. In 2002, they got killed including 2 turnovers from Romo. You are all more than familiar with his record in the NFL…. This creates a hurdle of self-believe but I think Romo's resilience can overcome this.
He is resilient
He has shown a great ability to bounce back from adversity. His 2007 performance was not impacted by the Seattle fumble. He came back from a 6 turnovers to help his team to victory against Buffalo. Sometimes those early losses set up a lack of belief that manifests itself in further failures (e.g. Levy’s Bills – lost SB narrowly then got blown out in later years….). I don’t think Romo is at this point yet.
I think the danger with this resilience is that he puts too much on himself and continues to take too many risks. In the playoffs this can kill you, as we have seen….
He is “philosophical” (but he does care)
Often with strengths there is another side to the coin. His nice guy personality and resilience I think also lead him to take a pretty balanced view of football – it is not the be-all and end-all for him. There has been a lot of flak over both the Calvin Watkins article and some of Romo’s press conference comments so I won’t rehash it here. But there is also a counter-point from Todd Archer.
This is where Aikman's advice resonates strongly. Romo has not handled perceptions well. Perhaps this is due to his rapid transition from obscurity to NFL star, perhaps due to his balanced view, but he does need to do this better. I personally don't believe his trip to Cabo was a big deal, but it undoubtly created much unneeded pressure and distraction. Perceptions do matter in the NFL, because the mediots are always looking for an angle.
He practices hard, but perhaps without sufficient discipline
These two articles also raise seemingly contradictory points about Romo’s practice habits which I had trouble reconciling. But after reviewing carefully and looking at other evidence (e.g. Woodson’s DC podcasts – great listening BTW) I think I have a view that reconciles them.
There is plenty of evidence of Romo’s work ethic in Archer’s article and from the past few years. Question is whether, as some believe, the fame and fortune has changed these habits. I don’t think so. If you read the CW article carefully it is not critical of HOW HARD Romo practices, but HOW he practices:
“ Romo, sources said, often forced throws in practice and often did not treat practice work consistently.”
I believe the issue is that he is not serious enough in practice and does not execute in practice how he should in the game. This carries over into game situations where he does force the ball when he shouldn’t or pre-determine which receiver is getting the ball regardless of coverage.
It seemed to me that there were a lot of throws this year where there was clear communication issues – even with Witten. Passes where the receiver never turned around or clearly wasn’t expecting the ball. Now I am sure that not all of those were Romo’s fault, but it is disciplined repetition in practice that would reduce the number of those errors or issues, whether by the receiver or Romo.
My “Romo recipe” for success
In my view Romo has both the physical talent and the resilience to be one of the Cowboy “greats”, but there are a few things he needs to do to get over that hump.
1. Lead by example. Got to hold yourself accountable before you can hold others accountable.
2. Continue to work hard – but practice with discipline, focus and concentration. Sset the tone for others as Aikman did. [The coaches hold the greater responsibility here though]
3. I don’t think he can change his nice guy personality and honestly I wouldn’t want him to. But he must hold people to account even if he knows they won’t take it well. If the player responds badly, then the coaches and other players must stand by Romo.
4. Manage perceptions - don't give the mediots any ammunition.
5. Don’t try to win it by yourself, limit mistakes and check-down or throw it away.
There was a short quote in his Eagles press conference that didn’t get much attention. “We didn’t show it today, and I’m disappointed and frustrated. But we will be better next year, I promise you that.”
I for one am looking forward to it.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
5 recs |
63 comments
Comments
i am looking forward to it as well
08 was a crazy year, alot of ups and downs, definitely a season that will be remembered or may not be
we’re still a good team, we blew out weaker teams when we needed to and we beat some good teams too
so i guess if we stay relatively healthy next year and make the roster changes we need to
we should be ok, also hopefully wade and garett step it up as well
tony romo is still my favorite quarterback in the nfl right now and i think people forgot too quickly how well he has played throughout his career, in a way he restored the franchise
"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips
by MrMinority on Jan 24, 2009 1:25 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Looking forward also
I know Tony has his flaws, but he is my quarterback and I wouldn’t trade him for Manning, or Brady, or Joe Montana or anybody.
After sitting through Chad Hutchinson, Quincy Carter, Ryan Leaf, Clint Stoerner,Vinny Testaverde, and Drew Bledsoe, I feel very lucky to have Romo. It’s great to have a quarterback who at least gives us hope again.
The thing about Tony is, he is nearing that intersection in a quarterbacks life where his peak physical ability, and peak understanding of the game cross paths. About age 30 is where a quarterback usually starts to really, really get it mentally, just before he begins to regress physically. I am excited for Tony’s future.
IF YOU'RE LOOKIN FOR ME...I'M AT THE SCRIP CLUB WITH PACMAN......AND WE'RE BEING REBELLION!!
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jan 24, 2009 11:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I wish I had your faith in him
I once did, but it is fading fast.
""I really dig Hannibal. Hannibal had real guts. He rode elephants into Cartilage." -Tyson
by cmr3 on Jan 24, 2009 1:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Romo too and have faith that he will become very good.
But If I could trade him straight up for Manning, I think i woulld pull the trigger on that deal
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 24, 2009 6:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Peyton or Eli?
Peyton is a better QB but his years are running out…I’d take Romo over Eli without a doubt. For my money, Peyton is the best QB in the league and arguably ever for what he does as field general/coach as well as his accuracy.
by Kansas Cowboy on Feb 1, 2009 3:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Peyton of course
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Feb 2, 2009 2:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
co-sign
Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/
by silverblue5 on Jan 25, 2009 12:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great job
Awesome post. This is a pretty fair accessment even in these controversal times.
""I really dig Hannibal. Hannibal had real guts. He rode elephants into Cartilage." -Tyson
by cmr3 on Jan 24, 2009 1:42 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
+1
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 24, 2009 6:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wisconsin Roots
I am proud to say Tony Romo is from Wisconsin, not because of his football skills but because of the person he is. We have our share of problems here, but we generally turn out people with good character. Romo exemplifies that. The flat tire story didn’t surprise me one bit but it did make me proud.
by Cowboy Louie on Jan 24, 2009 2:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Good post, good analysis and points.
I too share your enthusiasm for the future. I wish next season was next week.
by Benthere on Jan 24, 2009 6:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Very interesting he has never won a playoff game great research
I never knew this
by rioplayer7 on Jan 25, 2009 5:44 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
great post
Too bad all Cowboys fans don’t share your opinions about Romo, very well said.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 25, 2009 6:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
BTW, Danny White was a great QB
and should be mentioned among Staubach and Aikman. He’s a perfect example that qb needs to be on a great team with great defenses to get SB rings. Cowboys defenses in early ‘80s weren’t that good.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 25, 2009 6:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Danny White
was a tad bit before my time(I was 4 or so when Aikman was drafted, and that’s about as far back as I can remember), but my Dad who’s been a diehard since he was a boy swears up and down that Danny White was actually the best QB Dallas ever had. My Grandpa swears by Roger the Dodger. Despite the criticism I may throw Romo’s way, I still maintain hope he could surpass all three. He’s got the natural gifts, it appears. Just has to fix the little things here and there.
by the red scare on Jan 26, 2009 2:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Danny made some big mistakes...
in the biggest games. I think that is what kept him from being great in my book. But it is true that the 80’s Cowboys did not have too many great seasons defensively.
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
by gee-roj on Jan 26, 2009 7:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
He was excellent. If we can count Meridith up there, why not Danny?
Funny Danny White Anectdote:
I was at the Baltimore game (I was 9) where Glenn Corano started in Danny’s place due to injury. Landry allowed Danny to punt. Since it was his chance on the field, he faked a punt and ran about 20 yards. After he came to the sidelines, you could hear Landry screaming at him all the way in the stands.
by JimmyJohnson on Jan 26, 2009 3:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I beg to differ about the early 80's Defense....probably our best overall D in history..White couldn't win the big game, and threw tons of Int's...sounds like Romo 2.0
DE-Ed Jones
DT-Randy White
DT-John Dutton, Larry Cole
DE-Harvey Martin, Jim Jeffcoat
LB-Mike Hegman
LB-Bob Breunig, Eugene Lockhart
LB-DD Lewis
CB-Benny Barnes, Dennis Thurman
CB-Everson Walls, Ron Fellows
SS-Charlie Waters, Dexter Clinkscales, Bill Bates
FS-Dennis Thurman, Michael Downs
1980 Defense- 19.4 points per game-13th / D White 25 Int’s in 16 starts
1981 Defense- 17.3 " " “" "” " “" " "” " “"”- 7th / ‘’ " " "" " 13 Int’s in 15 starts
1982 Defense- 16.1 " " “" "” " " " “" "” " – 3rd / " “" "” “" 12 Int’s in 9 starts
1983 Defense- 22.5 " " "” " " " " " " " " " – 20th / " " “" " "” 23 Int’s in 16 starts
1984 Defense- 19.2 " “" " " " " " "” " " “" – 9th / "” “" " "” 11 Int’s in 6 starts
Danny White 91 starts in the 80’s ……………..123 INT’s…….1.35 INT’s per start
Defense was plenty good enough to win a championship, they didn’t make it to 4 NFC championship games on the arm of Danny INT White.
=========
2008 Defense- 22.8 " “"” “" " " "” " “" "” – 20th / Romo "" 14 Int’s 7 fumbles lost in 13 starts
Tony Romo 39 starts since taking over in ‘06……..46 INT’s………1.17 INT’s per start
Deja Vu ?
by CowboysRnumba1 on Jan 28, 2009 2:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No, I don't have deja vu. So, Romo, whose defense hasn't proven it can
do the job either when it counts (or did we watch different Philadelphia games in December?), has not had a chance yet to prove that he’ll be better or worse than Danny White. I also find it amusing that Romo is being trounced for not having won a playoff game, but Danny White sucks despite the fact that his teams repeatedly made it to the conference championships. If they had gone to the Super Bowl and lost four times would he have sucked then, too? If they lose it’s the QB’s fault; if they win, someone else gets the credit. Got it.
by Fernie67 on Jan 28, 2009 8:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly you have an awful memory
The defenses were the reason we lost 3 consective championship games in the early ’80s, Danny White was a big big reason we got there.
Defenses weren’t even close to the defenses of the ’70s and ’90s, not even close. To say they were championship defenses is absolutely laughable.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 28, 2009 2:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Once again.....I never said Danny White sucked..and my memory is quite clear..
You said the defenses of the early 80’s sucked, and that’s the reason Danny White didn’t win any SuperBowls..league rankings of 3rd, 7th, 9th in 3 of the 5 early 80 years dispell your theory. I look at the Defensive roster of the early 80’s and I see multiple Hall of Fameers, ALL PRO, and Pro Bowl performers…….therefore your statement holds no merit, or justification. So laugh at that oh rose colored delusionalist.
by CowboysRnumba1 on Jan 28, 2009 9:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
rankings mean nothing
If you actually watched the playoff games in that era, you would know that the defenses played very bad in those games.
Same thing happened to Dan Fouts in the ’80s, he practically had to outscore teams in the playoffs, Danny White had to do the same thing.
Let me ask you something, who was responsible for “The Catch” in the 1982 NFC Championship game? Who was responsible for Wilbert Mongomery running roughshod over us in the 1981 NFC Championship game? Who was responsible for Joe Theismann and John Riggins having their way with us in the 1983 NFC Championship game?
Danny White…I don’t think so. It was those horrid defenses and obviously those rankings or all-pro designations really didn’t mean jack diddly squat, did they?
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 29, 2009 8:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not going to continue...Obviously you had the same affection for Danny White pre-internet, that you have now with Romo.
And we all know getting through to you is damn well impossible…so i’m not going to fight it…i’ll let you go on protecting your QB’s til you die….QB’s are never at fault in your world, only Defenses, O Lines, RB’s, and WR’s ….QB’s only win games, they never lose them.
He’s a perfect example that qb needs to be on a great team with great defenses to get SB rings
- Terry
Danny White meet modern day Danny White = Tony Romo
by CowboysRnumba1 on Jan 29, 2009 12:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I never said QBs win games
get your facts straight. BTW, Danny White certainly wasn’t my favorite player in the ’80s, Tony Hill, Drew Pearson and Dorsett were my favs.
If Romo can become as good as White someday, I’ll be very happy. White would have had multiple SB rings with a good defense.
And yes, defenses, OLs, and the rest of the team do contribute more to a team’s wins or loses than just one player, for someone who claims to have played the game, you should know that.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 29, 2009 12:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL....your just laughable...
You blame an all star riddled defense for Danny White’s failures to win championships, and you blame an all star riddled o line, and wr corp for Romo’s failures to win any important games….yet you say no other QB can lead this team besides Romo…Sounds like your the one resting all our triumph and glory at the feet of Romo when we win, yet it’s never his play that costs us losses…And yes, Romo has single handedly lost games for the Cowboys, ( you witnessed it live in Pittsburgh, remember ? ) and i’ve played and coached this game longer than i’d like to remember, and I know the game well.
Ok, so you say QB’s never win games, yet Big Ben proved last night that they do indeed win games…and your also saying unless our team has a great defense, and offensive line, Romo will never win SB rings here…cuz QB’s can’t win games…baloney.
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 2, 2009 12:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Roethlisberger didn't win that game
Holmes was MVP and got open and his OL blocked extremely well that drive.
If Romo gets that time and his receivers get open, he could have made those plays too, no doubt about it.
Steelers won the game, not Big Ben, not by a long shot.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Feb 2, 2009 12:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Roethlisberger didn't "get" that time by pulling it out of some magic Crackerjack box.
He had to run around in circles behind a leaky line to pull off that game-winning drive. While Romo is capable of buying that kind of time running around how many times have we seen Romo get antsy after extending a play a little too long; it’s either getting stripped from behind or going all the way back to the Week 2 a poor overthrow that gets picked off.
Also, the game-winning TD pass was a precise laser and by no means an easy pass to make. Not to mention that early on in the drive the Cards should’ve had Big Ben dead to rights on about the 2-yard line then following that, he converted a 1st-and-20.
by MadMick on Feb 2, 2009 4:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not a Roethlisberger fan
but give him his due. He should have been the MVP. Like you said, he should have been sacked a couple of times during that last drive. Because of his moving around, Holmes got open and he fired it in there. I don’t know if Romo would have done that. He seemed to have lost a step this year and held on to the ball too long and either would get sacked or fumble.
by texstar on Feb 2, 2009 5:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Romo could have easily done that
Just go back and watch the Steelers/Cowboys game, Romo scrambles just as well as Ben if not better.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Feb 3, 2009 9:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
then proceeded to throw up some wounded ducks that were picked off...
your point ?
scambling then converting on the pass is what’s being discussed here..not the ability to run around like a chicken without a head…
Big Ben had a magnificant display of will, drive, character, toughness, and leadership to take charge in that game……and it’s a damn shame he wasn’t voted MVP.
very bad example..
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 3, 2009 10:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
what about the TD to T.O.?
guess you selectively choose to forget that play.
I got news for you, Roethlisberger throws as many wounded ducks as Romo if not more.
Go watch all the Steelers games this season and you’ll see.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Feb 3, 2009 10:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We were discussing his SB performance..
in which 20 of 21 completions went for 1st downs, and his game winning drive..I’d take Romo over Ben…but until Romo grows a pair like Ben, he’ll always be looked at as inferior to Ben….
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 3, 2009 1:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know what that means
Ben had receivers get open and he made the throws. When Romo’s receivers get open, he does the same thing.
Ben has 2 rings because he’s lucky enough to play on teams with great defenses. I’m confident Romo could duplicate Ben’s performance if given the opportunity.
Don’t forget, we’re talking about the Cardinal defense, Romo put up good numbers against them too before he broke his hand.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Feb 3, 2009 2:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There is a big difference between the Cards D we played
and theur D in the playoffs
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Feb 3, 2009 11:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
they were playing good ball in Sept and Oct
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Feb 4, 2009 8:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ok Terry
if you say so
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Feb 5, 2009 12:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think QB is almost a copout for MVP
Ben played a GREAT game, don’t get me wrong. But Holmes terrorized the Cards D all night. And the last drive solidified it for him. Not only did he make the game winning (and AMAZING) TD grab, but he set himself up a few plays before that, too.
…Plus he’s a buckeye haha
by AikmanNailedMySis on Feb 4, 2009 8:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Fitzy should have won it
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Feb 5, 2009 12:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the only reason he didn't is b/c they lost
by AikmanNailedMySis on Feb 6, 2009 12:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Even if they lost
As long as Holmes doesn’t make that ridiculous catch, I think Fitzgerald gets the honor.
He was MVP of the playoffs.
In-YOUR-endo
by accidental innuendo on Feb 6, 2009 3:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeas he was
but I think thta he deserved the MVP even though they lost. Although a losing player never wins it.
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Feb 6, 2009 4:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dallas Cowboy Chuck Howley won SB MVP in a losing effort...
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 9, 2009 9:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ok I didnt know that
Although in general losing players dont win the MVP
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Feb 11, 2009 12:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the reply gets no comment at all
wow.
ok, just one reply
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 2, 2009 10:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Battle Fatigue
I’ve given up for now.
(Romo) still gets excited when he buys a new t-shirt at Target for crying out loud
by I_miss_Switzer on Feb 2, 2009 11:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure this a truly fair comparison - Romo is actually the best on INT%
These QB’s were at different stages of their careers and were also throwing different volumes of passes.
The fairest comparison is int% i.e. No of interceptions / no of attempts. To make it fairer, I have compared the equivalent number of passes that Romo has completed. I had to use whole seasons, so its not exact but its pretty close. Also note this is regular season only.
Romo: first 1307 passes – Int% of 3.5%
Aikman: first 1528 passes – 3.9%
Staubach: 1354 – 4.6%
White: 1177 – 4.8%
So on a like for like comparison on interceptions, Romo is #1.
However, both Aikman and Staubach both had a SB winning season within those pass attempts. Interestingly in those SB winning seasons both had low Int‘s – Staubach’s was 1.9 and Aikman 3.0%, so I think there is some validity to the point.
"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson
by BoyfromOz on Jan 28, 2009 10:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Point is...You cut down on turn overs..your chances of winning increase.
Danny White did not shine when he needed to the most, in the playoffs…
How our seasons ended.
’80 12-31 127 yds. 1 INT LOSS
’81 16-24 173 yds. 2 INT LOSS
’82 9-15 113 yds. LOSS
’83 32-53 330 yds. 3 INT LOSS
’85 24-43 217 yds. 3 INT LOSS
Not to take anything away from Danny White, cuz teams back then were stacked and played together for years, and alot better powerhouses than todays NFL which is diluted with free agency which i guess promotes parity…..Dallas was the better team back then, but always found a way to lose in the end…very similiar to this current team….
by CowboysRnumba1 on Jan 28, 2009 10:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you mean the defenses found a way to lose back then
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jan 29, 2009 8:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Awesome post
Great job man, that was an extremely fair assessment. I personally don’t believe a whole lot in the idea of “choke artists.” Romo has several game winning drives no one even brings up because once someone screws up once its hard to get rid of the label you receive. He has also won several big games, one being the Giants game this year. And as far as the media goes, I agree, the Cabbo incident was wrong only in the sense that the media would create distractions. If the media never found out, I would find nothing wrong with that. And the whole Jessica situation, (as much as I hate the NFL turning into Seventeen Magazine, I hafta adress this) I mean, its really not his fault the media has an obsession with his personal life.
by witten82 on Jan 26, 2009 1:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
He still needs some help to reach his full potential
Romo can be the leader of the team, but I feel like he gets too much put on his shoulders. I mean utilize the running game more, if pass protection is not good, use screens, roll outs, bootlegs. I feel like Garrett and Wade Wilson need to help him out a little more. Emphasize decreasing turnovers (that would be a good starting point.)
I’m glad to hear him say he’s going to step it up. I think Aikman had a point when he offered his opinion. Romo needs to focus more on being the QB of the Dallas Cowboys to get to the next level. He needs to find the balance between:
a)patient, smart, limiting mistakes QB
b)gun-slinging, play-maker QB.
Right now he’s to much of b, and not enough a.
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
by APerfectStar on Jan 26, 2009 3:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Nice post
It’s easy to forget that he is still learning because of the early success he’s had. We and the mediots had maybe unfair expectations of him. I think he’s on his way to being great and I think the choker label is a load of crap. We’ve seen him lead to many key drives to think the pressure unravels him.
by illcowboy on Jan 27, 2009 8:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
+1
he’s had way to many game winning/tying drives and always seems to get a field goal right before the half even with like 15 seconds left
He can only get better, he’s still learning and if Carrot and the O-line do their part, we can see 07 stats again.
and maybe a playoff win, or two, or three.
"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips
by MrMinority on Jan 27, 2009 10:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+2
"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 27, 2009 11:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Job...
I think Tony has all the tools to be a championship QB but needs someone to reign him in every once in a while.
I’d like to see him focus most on recipe item 2 in terms of discipline and focus both in practice and in the games.
Garrett needs to get a clue!
by BulletBob on Jan 28, 2009 3:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















