Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: NHL Free Agency Coverage: NHL Rumors, NHL Signings & Trades


Random Wednesday Cowboys Notes

-- Garrett Would Give His Denver D to Dom:

From Michael Lombardi, at the National Football Post:

I know if Jason Garrett gets the head coaching job in Denver, he wants Dom Capers of the Patriots, and formerly of the Dolphins, as his defensive coordinator.

-- Come on Down!

Georgia underclassmen Knowshon Moreno and Matthew Stafford announced for the NFL draft today.  Keep 'em coming.  With Dallas picking 51st and 69th with its first two selections, a good dozen or so underclassmen would help push quality seniors who are rated in the early 2nd round range into Dallas' reach. 

Here's the full list of underclassmen who have declared.

-- Don't be Cheap, Jerry

There's one name on the Cowboys free agent list that jumps out -- restricted free agent WR Miles Austin.  He's one of the bright spots from the '08 season.  One year ago, he was a big tease, a speedy guy with questionable hands.  The team spoke well of his skills, but he was nothing but a hope to replace Terry Glenn.

 

Star-divide

Austin emerged from the Sam Hurd/Isaiah Stanback group this year.  He showed velcro hands and ran better routes.  He had taken over the Denver preseason game when his zeal to impress the coaches did him in.  He waved off position coach Ray Sherman, who wanted him to stay on the sidelines after a TD catch.  Austin took his place on the kickoff coverage unit and took a helmet on his left knee. 

The sprain took him out of action until week two.  He made a big impression against the Packers in week three, catching the game-sealing 63 yard bomb from Tony Romo early in the 4th quarter.   He was getting on the field more when he re-injured his knee and had to sit out a month.

When he returned, Roy Williams was working in Austin's spot.  He still made some big plays in the Redskins win in week eleven.  He made a sliding 18 yard grab on a deep out to jump-start Dallas first long drive of the evening.  In the 4th, he made a clutch conversion of a 3rd and seven, where he ran a shallow cross, caught Tony Romo's pass, spun and dove past Chris Horton for the last, critical feet.  In between he had another big reception nullified by a penalty.

Austin wrenched his knee on the spin and sat down for the third time this year.   He only tallied 13 catches for the season, but averaged 21.4 yards on those grabs.  With T.O. getting double coverage every week after the Eagles win, Austin was the one deep threat on the roster -- when he was healthy.

The "low-round" free agent tender is just over $1 million.  A second-round tender is $1.5 M.  A first-round tender is just under $2.2 million.

Austin was an un-drafted free agent.  If another team signs him away, the Cowboys would get nothing in compensation.  They've been looking for a young complement to Owens for a while.  Bill Parcells and Jeff Ireland brought him to Dallas in '06 and you know they have an eye on him. 

If the Cowboys go cheap on him and watch him blossom for another team, they'll hear this is Jimmy Smith II.  They don't need that headache.

This is How You Do It

In my offensive line review, I concluded that Dallas needs to find a young OL or two to challenge the big-ticket vets.  Look at Denver for an example of how you can revamp a line and upgrade your offense without breaking the bank. 

In 2007, the Broncos offense was 11th overall in yards.  It's line was respectable:  it ranked 9th in rushing, and pushed opponents for 4.6 yards per attempt.  (Both those figures were higher than Dallas' line).  The Broncos gave up 32 sacks, which was ranked mid-pack, three spots below Tony Sparano's last group. 

That wasn't good enough for Mike Shanahan and OL coach Rick Dennison.  They overhauled the line completely this offseason, replacing four of the five starters.  Second year player and first year starter Chris Kuper was the only vet to keep his job, though he moved from left guard to right guard, where he replaced Montrae Holland.

Second year OT Ryan Harris was inserted next to Kuper at RT.  Eight year vet Ben Hamilton returned from an injury that cost him '07 and played at left guard.  The Broncos claimed Chiefs castoff C Casey Weigmann and put him in the pivot.

In April, Denver spent a 1st rounder on Ryan Clady, who played at a Pro Bowl level at left tackle. 

And the Broncos got much, much better.  They finished 2nd overall in offensive yards.  Their run ranking dropped three slots from 9th to 12th, but the Broncos were far more effective;  they ranked 18th in rushing attempts in '07 but 28th last year.   Their yards-per-attempt rose from 4.6 to 4.8, and that's with severe turnover at the RB position.

Their sacks dropped from 32 in '07 to a league-best 12 last year.

I'm not advocating that Dallas draft an OT in the first round.  They don't have a pick that high.  But look at Kuper and Harris.  The former was a 5th round pick in '06.  Harris was a 3rd round pick in '07.

These are the type of picks I'm hoping to see from Dallas this year.  I want one of those first two picks used on an OL and one of the two 4ths as well.   If they stick, the Cowboys are covered in case of injury and can make a simple swap if one or both of the kids are ready to play in the future. 

The Dallas starters are good, but not great.  Denver's example shows that you can always get better.   Much better.

 

0 recs | Comment 129 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

+1

I merged the two groups

"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams

by Jim Vance on Jan 7, 2009 3:13 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

please

jerry
resign miles austin
him and crayton are both good in the slot
but its like whenever austin gets an opportunity he capitalizes
and hes alot faster and can stretch the field
hurd isn’t bad, i remember some games when he made some plays but i dont think he’ll be able to crack the depth chart and will sit inactive with stanback
which leads me to…stanback, well maybe when hes heathy he can compete for a spot but i havnt seen anything that would confirm he could do that
i guess hes still a work in progress

"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips

by MrMinority on Jan 7, 2009 3:15 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Stanback has been hurt

He’s also entering his third year.

Austin was at this same point one year ago, and look at how he jumped. I’m not guaranteeing anything for Stanback, but an Austin-like jump would be welcome. In camp all the receivers, ALL of them, kept mentioning him as the guy who could be really special if he kept working and learned the position. They were envious of his physical tools.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 7, 2009 3:19 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yea

hes like a better todd lowber
because he’s a great athlete he just needs more time
im not giving up on his cause but right now we know where he stands
also with irvin helping him out in the offseason he could improve

"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips

by MrMinority on Jan 7, 2009 3:41 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

really

Didn’t know that.. Isn’t shoulder injury a reoccurrence?

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 4:06 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A first or second round tender

for Austin for sure. A low round tender and he’s certainly gone. The question is whether a 2nd rounder is enough. Remember Miami tried to skate Welker through on a 2nd round tender. We know how that worked out for both sides. Not saying that Austin would leave and then lead the league in catches. But you get the point.

A first round tender would look him up almost for sure.

He looks like a player. Lets keep these types of guys around. The incremental cost is only $600K.

by Ridgelake on Jan 7, 2009 3:18 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Austin is 2nd round tender material...It is not the same as Welker...Welker PROVED his value on the field for Miami..

Austin’s value is purely projection and speculation….going on his 18 career catches in 3 seasons..I don’t see any teams looking to drop a 2nd rounder on him…I’d like the guy to stay, at least another season to show what he’s got, and to see if he can stay healthy before i drop some long term deal at his feet….IF Jerry is afraid to lose him, then give him a one year 1st round tender deal…but he’s not worth 2 million per year quite yet…

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 7, 2009 9:10 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'll take a guy averaging 21 yds a carry in the nfl

over any second rounder this year.

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 9:23 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah with 21 yds a catch I think we should give him a first round tender

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 8, 2009 3:37 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You make a tender offer to a player

you choose the price you offer, according to the chart.

If the player signs the tender, he’s yours for that price.

If he refuses to sign, and another team signs him for a long-term deal, you get the compensation dictated by the tender from the signing team.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 7, 2009 3:22 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good point on Welker

New England took some cheap shots when they signed him; the rippers said they “overpaid.” The pointed out that they could not cover him when they played Miami.

They knew what they were doing.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 7, 2009 3:20 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Stanback is Like Samuel L. Jackson..

in that M. Night Shyamalan movie, where he was Mr. Glass and Bruce Willis was never hurt. Stanback just seems too fragile for the game.

I hope we keep Austin (and he becomes more like Bruce Willis) and we see if we can work out a trade for Crayton and Stanback. If you added up all of Crayton’s and Stanbacks good plays over the last 2 years, it might equal 1 good game.

"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams

by Jim Vance on Jan 7, 2009 3:23 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

and Austin isn't fragile ??? c'mon....get off Stanback...geez...it's is first year as far as i'm concerned....

at least he had the guts to forgo surgery for the better of the team, and play with a dislocated friggin shoulder….

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 7, 2009 9:12 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

Kid has special skills, the only thing that will prevent him from being great is that he might be a china doll, Cowboys should give him at least this season to see if he can remain healthy.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 8, 2009 8:12 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Tendering a 1st rd rd pick for Austin is a must

This guy is loaded with tremendous talent and has the potential to be special. Letting him slip away would be foolish IMO.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 7, 2009 3:24 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

OL picks

Hard to get excited about them with the ghosts of Free, Marten, McQuistan, Rogers and Peterman lurking…

Love the theory though.

by I_miss_Switzer on Jan 7, 2009 3:29 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You're going to have to start hitting on OL sooner or later

You can’t stop drafting them.

Every one of those guys you name was a Parcells pick. I want to see what the current scouting staff can produce.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 7, 2009 3:31 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not saying don't pick

Just hard to get excited.

Heck, hard to not break down and cry.

I notice Peterman is a two year starter for the mighty Lions. No idea if he is actually decent.

by I_miss_Switzer on Jan 7, 2009 3:33 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i'm for drafting offensive line help

but they need to change their criteria. whatever it is that they’ve been basing their picks on so far ought to be flushed immediately.

by g8tgod on Jan 7, 2009 3:35 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He is O line coach at tiny Cetral Connecticut College....looks like he's getting into coaching..

He did some intern coaching stint in the NFL already….

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 7, 2009 10:08 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Roy Williams

I was so mad when we traded for Roy. Miles was playing very well. He could have been our #2.

by ym on Jan 7, 2009 3:58 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He still can be

T.O. is 35. He’s not going to be a Cowboy much longer.

That’s the point of keeping Miles.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 7, 2009 3:59 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

AZ figured out..

I know tougher with Witten- but Fitz, Boldin, and Breaston all topped 1000 yds..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 4:09 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But they also had the worst running game in the NFL

I could do without that.

I’d rather have two 1,000 yd RB’s.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Jan 7, 2009 6:03 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

T.O

I think T.O. is going to be out #1 option for two more years. He was productive despite playing with Brad Johnson and an inconsistent offense. He just does a great job of taking care of his body. Miles could have been our #2 this year, when he was healthy, and next year.

by ym on Jan 7, 2009 4:26 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ed Reed Airs Jason G. Out.. WOW
That was a real simple game plan that they attacked us with," said Reed of the Cowboys’ offense. “I thought it would be more complicated, but it was a real simple game plan that they attacked us with. I mean we knew it. Looking at these coaches’ openings and talking about a certain someone from Dallas, I’m like, ‘Hold on now.’
"It’s just Garrett, Garrett, Garrett. I knew the plays we were going against. Maybe that was the game plan for us. But when you watch it on tape, it’s not as complicated as I thought it would be. I’m surprised people want to fire Wade Phillips down there and he’s the one calling the defense — and the defense is successful. The guy who’s calling the offensive plays isn’t getting the same turnaround. Maybe it’s the players.”

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nfceast/0-7-56/Reed—Cowboys-had-a—simple—game-plan.html

Jerry can’t be happy..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 4:11 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Motivation

I am sure the Ravens players consider it an insult that Garrett turned down the HC job.

by I_miss_Switzer on Jan 7, 2009 4:14 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Maybe Not

The Steelers were saying the same thing.

by kindablue on Jan 7, 2009 5:15 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nothing more than a vindictive payback

Cowboys offense averaged 25 points this year when Romo was under center. If that’s simple, I’ll take it.

by NCCowboy on Jan 7, 2009 4:17 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

we scored 24 points

So, it wasn’t tha bad, but I think there is some truth in his words.

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 4:52 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Remember

14 points when Ravens were playing softer Defense.

In-YOUR-endo

by accidental innuendo on Jan 7, 2009 5:32 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

FINALLY a BONIFIED AUTHORITY ON DEFENSE BACKS MY CAMPAIGN

Both Ray Lewis and Ed Reed….TWO NFL Player of the Year recipients share my bewilderment as to why this azzclown Garrett still has a job, or even garners interest in this league….I heard Columbia is looking for a QB coach….see ya

GARRETT MUST GO !!!!!!!!!

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 7, 2009 9:20 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bona Fide Authority, I believe is what you mean

But are they really bona fide? You aren’t the least bit curious why, when Ed Reed should be preparing for Tennessee, he takes time to be interviewed on Michael Irvin’s show and goes out of his way to pillory Jason Garrett? He wasn’t even asked about Garrett. Sounds more like payback for Garrett jilting the Ravens coaching offer last year than valid criticism.

by NCCowboy on Jan 8, 2009 6:56 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wouldn't it make more sense to try to sign Austin longer term

I agree we need him to stay, so why not go all in and try to get a 3-4 yr deal done?

by StillHateTheGiants on Jan 7, 2009 4:21 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Miles Effing Austin

What has he done to earn a first round tender? Give him a second, if Bill wants him, Jerry gets the Phins pick. The Boys may not get Crabtree, Maclin or Harvin but, Louis Murphy or Brain Robiskie should be acceptable compensation for a UFA.

by birdness on Jan 7, 2009 4:21 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why are you getting so wound up

about $500K?

What’s that 2nd rounder going to cost you?

Is he going to average 20 yards a catch? How long do you have to wait to get that production?

Why swap a sure thing for a maybe for $500K

by Rafael Vela on Jan 7, 2009 4:27 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Let me add

What did Roy Williams do to earn his huge contract?

T.O., Austin, Crayton, Witten and Bennett all averaged more per catch that that guy.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 7, 2009 4:29 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree with you that we should use a first on Austin

but calling him a “sure thing” seems like a bit of a stretch

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 8, 2009 3:53 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Respectfully disagree...

… a first round tender is not that much.

Austin has at least three years experience in this system and increased familiarity with Romo. Plus, his development and maturity continues to excel.

The percentages show that with a rookie WR, it usually takes longer for them to be productive.

See Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly of the Skins.

Just my humble opinion…

"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson

www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]

by silverblue5 on Jan 7, 2009 4:57 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

I think the majority of people on btb say sign him to the 1st round tender..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 5:18 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Need to keep him

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Jan 7, 2009 5:28 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i AGREE....He should at least get signed to a 1st...now that I look at it...

I wouldn’t sign him long term though until mid season…see what he brings..

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 7, 2009 9:22 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+10

Whatever they need to do to keep a young WR with potential like Austin has shown. I’m sure it will take a 1st round tender to keep him. Plus if some team wants him bad enough, the Cowboys get a 1st round pick.

T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003

by APerfectStar on Jan 7, 2009 6:12 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think we'll need austin next year

TOs getting old. Last year was his first year without an injury, but his play dropped off. He had problems for most of the year with the press. His route running isn’t great. Hes still a very good receiver, but i don’t think anyone can say for sure two years from now he’ll be at a #1 receiver level.

Who knows what’ll happen with roy williams.

I honestly feel Austin may be our future at WR.

by foyesboys on Jan 7, 2009 5:45 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Who

do you think is the best safety we can get in our draft position?

by jkyu2006 on Jan 7, 2009 4:22 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Should be plenty of decent Safeties out there for us...

It’s pretty safe to say USC’s Mays and Missouri’s Moore will be off the charts by the time our pick comes around.

Here’s some names that should get picked up from rounds 2 through 5.

Chung-Oregon
Pegues-Miss St
Hamlin-Clemson
Johnson-Alabama
Delmas-W Michigan
Vaughn-Wake Forest
Greene-Rutgers
Taylor-LSU
Bruton-Notre Dame

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 7, 2009 9:55 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

40 times, bench press, and ball hawking

I can’t wait for the combine

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 10:59 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think

the worry is our defense. Draft an Olinemen, then take mostly defense. Saftey is a big priority. But, if only Romo wouldn’t throw so many interceptions. (I know a lot of it is the O-line, but who am I going to blame, Big LEONARD DAVIS?).

Defense strategies next year vs the Cowboys will be all positions wear 82.

by jkyu2006 on Jan 7, 2009 4:29 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We draft for

Defense every fricking year. I am sick of having to draft for Defense!!!!!!! Just draft some NFL caliber players Jerry. I would rather have Henry at Safety than bust a nut for a safety who won’t make it.

by GunsUp on Jan 7, 2009 10:09 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

last year

2 of our top 3 picks were RB and TE.

Henry is an iffy tackler and is brittle.

by I_miss_Switzer on Jan 7, 2009 10:32 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

your upset with

scandrick and Jenkins?

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 10:59 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

so many INTs??

He threw 14 in 13 games, thats not a lot. Throwing 15 INTs or less a season for a gunslinger is pretty good actually.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 8, 2009 8:18 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well if he had of played a whole season he would have probably thrown more than 15

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 8, 2009 8:51 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

maybe..maybe not

I can live with my qb averaging one INT per game, especially if it comes in the first half.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 8, 2009 9:01 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The timing of an Int does not affect how much of a negative impact it has on the game

Every interception costs your team a possible 7 points minimum, and even though interceptions late in the game may be pointed to afterwards as big plays, they are no more important than interceptions in the first quarter

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 8, 2009 9:13 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I disagree

An INT or fumble late in the game is much worse than earlier in the game for the simple reason that a team can overcome a TO earlier in a game than late.

I also disagree that every INT costs a team possible points because a team is just as likely to punt on any given possession than score.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 8, 2009 9:24 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well firstly a team can also put itself in a position by playing well early in a game

that a turnover late in the game wont cost them a victory. Late game turnover are just morer memorable and as such are sometimes thought to have more impact on a game than those that occur earlier.

And on the subject of possible points, note the word possible. Every time a team turns the ball over they end a drive in a way other than with a touchdown. However since a team could theoretically score a touchdown on every drive, them not scoring one on a turnover drive results in a loss of the seven possible points they could have gotten from that drive.

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 8, 2009 9:29 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

we'll have to agree to disagree on this one

You’ll never convince me the significance of a TO isn’t more detrimental later in a game because the odds are overcoming it are much greater…its pure logic to me.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 8, 2009 9:37 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's like saying

A touchdown in the first half is less valuable than one in the second half. They’re both worth 6 points, chief…

by AikmanNailedMySis on Jan 8, 2009 1:51 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 9, 2009 6:23 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Blue Chip Quarterback

Tex would do whatever it takes to move back into the middle of the first round to secure a blue-chip quarterback. The Cowboys won’t win a single playoff game over the next few years with the beleaguered Tony Romo at the helm – or at least until a fire is lit under his fat a#$ via competition, see Donovan.

The off-season mantra for the Dallas Cowboys needs to be… it’s the quarterback stupid. Changing coaches, coordinators, offensive line components, receivers won’t matter until the most important position in all of sports in addressed.

Mortgage next year’s #1. Package Choice, Spears, or whatever it takes to get back into the range of a Brady Quinn (22), Jay Cutler (11) or a Joe Flacco (18). In addition, sign Byron Anton Leftwich as soon as the free-agent window opens.

by Montecito Tex on Jan 7, 2009 4:31 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I also loathe these do-or-die scumbags who would rather start from scratch and be the Lions for a couple of years if the Cowboys can't win 14 games every year.

Also how can I take Tex seriously when he pays as much if not more attention to QB’s asses than their passes? If Romo flops as bad as a lot of folks suspect he will next season, he’ll be out of here soon enough. What has Quinn or Cutler won yet?

Byron Sandwich? He’s better than Brad but if he was that great why did the Falcons prefer to keep Chris Redman as a back-up over him?

by MadMick on Jan 7, 2009 6:35 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ummm....cuz Leftwich isn't ready to hang up his shot to start yet...maybe ??

Leftwich would be a major upgrade at the #2 QB spot here…and is welcomed by me for sure with open arms…I wanted him last off season…and he would have beat a few teams as well..

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 7, 2009 9:59 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Henson!!

He was about as blue chip as they get, Tex. Sorry, but your credibility regarding QBs is shot. I’ll trust your opinion on defensive coordinators, though.

by DavidH22 on Jan 7, 2009 6:44 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Leftwich

I wonder how many times he’d have been sacked had he been under center when we played Baltimore. They got how many rushers unblocked? 12? 15? I’m sure Byron’s slow feet and huge wind-up throwing motion might have been able to avoid a sack once or twice……

by Ridgelake on Jan 7, 2009 4:39 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Byron, don't call me Bryan

The difference between Leftwich and Romo is between the ears and in the heart. Where as Romo quits and folds at the first sign pressure, see his career portfolio, Byron has shown a tenacity, which this soft team lacks. He’d be a major upgrade over Brad Johnson… but then again so would Larry King, Phyllis Diller, and other Johnson-like fossils. Not having a contingency plan for our distractible and under-achieving signal caller was the biggest mistake of the 2008 season. That, along with retaining the BStew, the most unqualified Coordinator in the entire NFL.

by Montecito Tex on Jan 7, 2009 5:09 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Stockpile Quarterbacks

The Cowboys had Witten, but still the drafted Fasano and Bennett. They did the same at RB last year and the contingency became a necessity. Yet, at the most important position in all of sports, the great Jason Garrett had to work with a fossil and a failure.

Pay Romo and draft Brady Quinn. Draft Aikman and use a supplemental on Steve Walsh. Draft a quarterback every year and bring competition to the position. Lord knows Romo would rather be texting blondes about an episode of the Hills than playing a meaningful football game in December or January. Bring in competition for Van deVelde.

by Montecito Tex on Jan 7, 2009 5:23 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes, they should have kept Matt Moore

or brought in Chris Simms. But that was Jason Garrett’s fault. Garrett chose Johnson! The Brad Johnson Failure was Garrett’s choice.

I imagine that the Cowboys have trafted extra tight ends and running backs despite already having quality starters at those positions because

a) You can start more than one tight end or running back each play. Unless you’re the Ravens, you likely don’t insert two quarterbacks together
b) Different tight ends and running backs have different skill sets. Fasano was supposed to be a blocking specialist, for example. Martellus is more of a downfield threat. Felix Jones is a renowned home run hitter. These additional players provide different styles of play at the same position.
c) Different tight ends and running backs can play different positions on the field. Different tight ends can play H-Back, while some of the running backs can play in the slot or return kickoffs.

You don’t have to draft another QB high or often when you have a franchise QB like Romo. Yes he is a franchise QB. Maybe or probably draft one in the 4th round or so, or definitely sign a decent (young and mobile) free agent. Then make sure your OC knows to use the weapons he has (i.e., running backs) and you have an O-line that can pass block decently. That’s enough.

If you’re not happy with that, Tex, the Cowboys can always sign Drew Henson off of the Detroit Lions’ scrap heap.

by DavidH22 on Jan 7, 2009 6:57 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Matt Moore

Was nice, would have been nice to see what he could have done with Romo out..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 7:26 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good one

Had to look up Van deVelde—a painfully apt comparison for the moment. Perhaps the Anna Kournikova of the NFL? But not to his face; don’t want him to do a Jim Everett on me.

by NCCowboy on Jan 8, 2009 7:02 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Haha

I was actually waiting for College basketball. but fair enough.

by joey7289 on Jan 7, 2009 5:29 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You're under arrest

for aiding and abbetting known criminals!

by Benthere on Jan 7, 2009 5:41 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i love it..

You actually have a disclaimer for watching a tv channel..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 5:56 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Raf

With Jones now gone, do you think they’ll look for another corner, maybe later in the draft?

by joey7289 on Jan 7, 2009 5:30 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

start jenkins

in henry’s spot
put henry at free and move hamlin to strong
o yea cut roy “thong”

off topic: browns hire mangini

"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips

by MrMinority on Jan 7, 2009 5:32 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No way

They cut Henry now.

And Mangini, glad he’s getting another chance, to bad he’s put in a worse spot in Cleveland then he was in New York.

by joey7289 on Jan 7, 2009 5:33 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I disagree

I think Cleveland has more talent.

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 5:56 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh I'm not saying they don't

But there are a lot of problems. Just look at Romeo, he wanted Quinn as his QB, but they pretty much forced him to play Anderson. They will have a new GM coming in so maybe it’ll work out better then it did for Crennel.

by joey7289 on Jan 7, 2009 6:02 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wow

According to ESPN, 4 months after Pac was involved with another shooting. Now it is ESPN, but if true, makes a lot of sense why they cut him. He’ll never play in the league again.

by joey7289 on Jan 7, 2009 5:56 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pac

quit the nfl and become a stick up kid… That is where you heart is at..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 6:10 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"...turned stick up kid, look what U done did.. got sent up for a seven-year bid..."

"I got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell." -- Bruce Dickinson

www.brainfriednetwork.com [NEWS/SPORTS/FOOTBALL]

by silverblue5 on Jan 7, 2009 7:26 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Grandmaster Flash

I love it

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 8, 2009 4:00 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

2009 draft for the cowboys

  second, fourth, fifth, seventh round, of their own plus:

• Third round from Cleveland

• Fourth round from Detroit

• Fifth round from Tennesee(pac-rat)

• Sixth round from Miami for nose tackle Jason Ferguson

two late compensatory picks free agent loses(Jones and reeves)

by Deke on Jan 7, 2009 6:42 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thanks Deke

So we’ll have 3 picks between 50 and 100. I hope we get a quality NT, SS, OL with those pics. With the later pics I hope we get another OL, QB, and CB.

by staubachfan on Jan 7, 2009 8:41 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ed Reed is great, but he's wrong

It wasn’t the Raven’s defense that beat us, it was our defense. Our “simple” game plan put up 21 points on them late in the game.

As far as Austin, I wasn’t a believer before this season, but I am now. Lock him up. Hurd was looking pretty real himself before he got injured. As a matter of fact he was lighting up the Viking’s defense before and during the play he got injured on. I think they both figure into our plans.

It isn't what you say. It's what you do.

by Lunging Wolf on Jan 7, 2009 7:02 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah I'm not real thrilled that an opposing player

is taking pot shots at anyone on our team. I heard or read somewhere that the Colts offense is considered “simplistic”, it’s all in the execution. Besides, you’d think this guy would be busy getting ready for his upcoming butt whooping the Titans are about to deliver instead of bad mouthing people.

by Benthere on Jan 7, 2009 9:55 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

there's a big difference between simplistic and vanilla.......

and Garrett has ice cream all over his play book..

he MUST GO…..pass it on..

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 7, 2009 10:10 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't understand why everyone is saying that.

Jason must go? Come on, the Titans probably have the most simplistic offense in the league. That’s not the problem here. I still believe Jason Garrett can be one of the best. He’s been coaching for what, 3 years? I’ll bet Garrett spends the entire off-season watching film and soul searching. The game of football is won or lost on the line of scrimmage, and THAT’S where we lost our season. Not in injuries, or scheme, or formations, or complexity. Our blocking was good a few times, mediocre most of the time, and downright bad at the most crucial times. Garrett will learn as much as anyone in this league learned this year. He will get better. Give me the same team with the same scheme, and the same players, and have that O-Line dominate, and we’ll go to the Super Bowl.

It isn't what you say. It's what you do.

by Lunging Wolf on Jan 7, 2009 10:19 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Strongly disagree

In the 13 games Romo started, the Cowboys averaged 25.1 points and gained 370.5 yards. In 2007 when Garrett was considered a genius, the Cowboys averaged 28.4 points and 365.7 yards per game. Garrett isn’t perfect, but his playcalling is not the problem. Starting from scratch is not the answer and most likely will set back Romo’s development.

by NCCowboy on Jan 8, 2009 7:07 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Play calling is the problem.

With Romo starting, the Cowboys were 7-0 this year when they attempted less than 35 passes, and 1-5 when they attempted more.

Attempts per game in Cowboys wins (8 games): 30.6; interceptions: 7; sacks: 9; QB fumbles: 6.

Attempts per game in Cowboys losses (5 games): 41; interceptions: 7; sacks: 11; QB fumbles: 7.

by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 8, 2009 7:49 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And those QB turnovers . . .

14 turnovers by our QB had nothing to do with those 5 losses? Its easy to blame the scheme, if for no other reason it allows you to deflect attention from your mistakes.

by NCCowboy on Jan 8, 2009 8:18 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

no, only Pittsburgh game

did a TO decide a win or loss.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 8, 2009 8:24 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't disagree

But which losses do you want to blame on playcalling? Maybe Washington when Barber only ran the ball 8 times and F. Jones didn’t touch it. But, the defense should shoulder most of the blame in that one, allowing Washington to hold onto the ball for 38 minutes. Arizona? Special teams disaster. Eagles? Whole team fell flat. Which leaves the Ravens. Everyone wants to blame the scheme in that one, but poor play of the OL had more to do with that, in my opinion.

by NCCowboy on Jan 8, 2009 8:34 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Cowboys win and lose as a team

I’m not into calling out certain individuals or coaches and allocating blame as to why we lost certain games.

Bottom line is that the entire team underachieved this season and they have to play and coach better next season.

Keep this in mind as well, I don’t care what plays you call, the players still have to execute them so in the end thats what it really comes down to…execution and the team that does that the best and most consistently throughout the season wins the SB…its really that simple.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 8, 2009 8:45 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Redskins, Steelers, Ravens.

The team looked like they just quit in the Eagles game, so not that one. The defense allowed Washington to hold the ball that long because the Cowboys weren’t running the ball and getting time of possession. Against the Steelers, they should have been running the ball and working the clock when they had the lead in the 4th quarter.

If the line was playing so poorly against the Ravens, why did they call 47 passing plays when they were averaging 4.4 yards per carry? Isn’t that a failure to adjust by the coaching staff?

by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 8, 2009 11:00 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Almost every game is decided by turnovers Terry

whether directly as in the Pit game, or indirectly as in the Ravens game. Turnovers lost us far more than one game I can assure you

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 8, 2009 8:53 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

thats not true

The Chargers just beat the Colts but had more TOs, really costly ones I might add, so thats proves your assertion wrong.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 8, 2009 9:03 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not really

I said almost every game is decided by turnovers, so citing one example doesnt disprove my argument.

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 8, 2009 9:14 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

well I can site several more

and many the Cowboys played. Turnovers can decide games, but its not as many as you think.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 8, 2009 9:26 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They had more turnovers because they were throwing more.

7 of the interceptions were in the wins. Those numbers show that, obviously, if you throw more, you will have more interceptions, more sacks, and more QB fumbles. But they also show that Romo still did those things in other games, so what’s the difference? More pass attempts, and that’s game plan. By throwing more, you increase the opportunity for negative plays.

by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 8, 2009 10:44 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There's three things that can happen when you throw the ball

and two of them are bad. Can’t remember which coach said that.

by Benthere on Jan 8, 2009 1:21 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No one is saying don't run the ball.

First, we lost the Ravens game simply because of two fluke running plays at the end of the game. I don’t understand what you’re trying to say BPS. That the line was good? Our running game wasn’t as good as you’re saying it was. Your statistics are misleading because we were running the ball at the end of the games we were already leading. The Cowboys were 25th in the league in total running plays, but 8th in rushing fumbles. The passing game saved us from many of the fumbles the rbs lost. You have to admit the running game was not very effective this year. It wasn’t. And you can’t just throw away the accomplishments of the 07 squad at the drop of a hat. They had huge success throwing the ball in 07, and believed they could get it going again at some point in 08. So did I. Everyone wants to run the ball. We understand the concept. I’m excited about our talent at rb. The bottom line is we weren’t run blocking or pass blocking very well. Fix the line problems, and the running game will flourish. So will the passing game. We ALL want to run the ball, but we need a mix of run and pass.

It isn't what you say. It's what you do.

by Lunging Wolf on Jan 8, 2009 10:01 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How do they determine what round the compensatory picks are?

Jones ran for 700 yards and Reeves was a full-time starter with 4 interceptions. I’d be bummed if we only got a couple 7th rounders for them. How about a couple 4ths? I have no clue how it works…any insight would be appreciated.

by DavidH22 on Jan 7, 2009 7:02 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm guessing a fifth and a sixth, fourth rounders probably would be a reach

won’t know for awhile, has to do with contribution and playing time..

by Deke on Jan 7, 2009 7:06 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We lost JJ and Jacque, but we signed Zach.. He played pretty well..

A team is eligible to receive compensatory draft picks if it is determined that they lost more or better players than they were able to acquire during the previous year’s free agency period. The number of picks a team receives equals the net loss of compensatory free agents (maximum of four).

Compensatory free agents are determined by a formula that was developed by the NFL Management Council. Not every free agent lost or signed by a team is covered by this formula

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 7:29 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

so Zack should negate Reeves play, seemingly we'll get one pick for Jones, who did alright..

lucky if we get a 5th for whole deal..

A true diehard Cowboys fan since 1975.

President - Garrett MUST GO campaign -

by BoyzRback on Jan 7, 2009 10:06 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

that is my thinking

we will get one, not two..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 7, 2009 11:00 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Julius Jones

I doubt he brings better than a 7th round pick. He didn’t even get 700 yards and he lost the starting job.

by troysboys on Jan 7, 2009 11:51 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

he came out so hot..

what a bum.. It took his brother 3 teams before he got it right..

"Protect the Romo, Save the Cowboys!!"

by Wmillion on Jan 8, 2009 12:14 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Terrellowenstonyromo_small
The True Area of Concern
Small
Food for thought
Jessica_simpson_tony_romo_main_small
Romo vs. December
Jessica_simpson_tony_romo_main_small
Romo vs. The Clutch
Profile3_small
For Tarheel Paul...

Recent FanPosts

050_small
Tarheel pauls family
Small
Tony, Tiger and Me
Picture_6_small
Marvin Harrison rumor — Really? Again?
318039_small
Let's Put Our Heads Together Re: Ed Werder
Pirate2_small
Romo vs. Woods vs. Boehner
Picture_8_small
Trash Talk Circle

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Editor

Profile3_small Dave Halprin (Grizz)

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Michael_irvin1_800_small Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88)

Me70s_small Aaron Novinger (Bigrigga31)

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Smile_small Jim Vance

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports