Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Falling Action: Best and Worst of UFC 146

Cowboys @ Chiefs: Winning Beats Losing

What's a fan supposed to make out of a win like the Dallas Cowboys victory over the Kansas City Chiefs in overtime? It's a win, but the team had some problems along the way. The offense might have found a new weapon, but the same mistakes and penalties continue to dog this squad. The quarterback looked sharp, but the defense only played 55 minutes again (although they did get a BIG stop in OT).

So how do you approach the aftermath of a game like that?

I turn to the all-wise and knowing sports sage, Ebby Calvin ‘Nuke' LaLoosh, from Bull Durham. Ebby has the secret knowledge you need to judge this game when he said, "I love winning ... It's like, you know, better than losing!"

Couldn't have said it better myself.

More below...

Star-divide

We sure didn't scare anybody else in the league with our performance on Sunday, except for a few opposing defensive coordinators that might have an unpleasant moment or two watching Miles Austin on tape. Other than that, the Cowboys lapsed into the same old self-inflicted wounds that keep them from truly finding out how good they could be.

You can make the argument that maybe this is the kind of win that can get something started, a near-disaster against an inferior opponent that slaps a team in the face, waking them up from a slumber. You can say the team showed heart and guts to come back and win even though they were the ones that put themselves behind. You can say that Romo found some of his mojo, and he found a new, fun toy to throw the ball to. You could say all these things and more.

But the only reason you can say it is because we won. In the NFL, it's not about winning pretty. Sure, we'd love for the Cowboys to blow teams out, but they're not playing for votes and rankings - in the pros it's all about W's and L's. Winning 26-20 in overtime counts the exact same for your playoff hopes as a 44-7 blowout.

The very simplistic point is they might not have done it the way we'd all like to see, but they did it. Win and move on. It's not quite one-and-done at this stage of the season, but banking wins in the NFL, on the road, is paramount. The Cowboys now have two on the road. Against bad teams? Yes. But at the end of the year, they don't note how you won, just if you won.

For every good someone can find with this team, you can find a bad. Tony Romo had a great day. The offensive line still gets too many penalties, at the worst times. Miles Austin played the Felix Jones role to perfection - home-run hitter. The defense gave up points late in the game, again. Keith Brooking is a long-toothed vet still knocking heads. Flozell Adams is a long-toothed vet teetering on the precipice. Tashard Choice runs with bad intentions. The defensive line hasn't figured out the definition of offsides. You could play this game for hours with this team. You could also drive yourself crazy!

At 3-2, the Cowboys have managed to keep themselves in the hunt. That's what this win does. It moves the ball forward on the ultimate goal, getting to the playoffs. Dallas is one of eight teams in the NFC with a winning record. We're in the hunt.

Forget about homers and haters - most of us are just trying to grab hold and hang on for the ride. Heading into a bye week is coming at the right time; getting Felix Jones and Marion Barber healthy will certainly be a bonus on offense. Roy Williams can also heal. Flozell can try to gather up a second-wind and at least return to reasonable form. The Cowboys can hopefully get on a roll. Then again, things could go the other way, too.

But for the moment, after a game like Sunday, just say to yourself, "I love winning ... It's like, you know, better than losing!"

Comment 215 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Flo srsly bothers me...

… he just can’t keep up w/ the speed rushers anymore. Not sure Free is quite ready, but he’s good enough to bench Flo at times when he f’s up

Superbowl, or BUST.

by .FRoST.USAF on Oct 12, 2009 5:36 AM CDT reply actions  

A LT Is A Priority . . .

in the next free agent period. If there is anyone available then we must go after this player even if it means blowing the salary structure all to heck. Or, we need to think about finding a free agent center and making the move of Leonard Davis to LT. I am all for inserting Free to see what he can do.

by Iowacowboy on Oct 12, 2009 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Jerry is not drafting a LT in the draft...

Just look at this teams dismal history or drafting OL…Unless we totally tank this season there won’t be a LT in the draft that could come in as a rookie and start. uhh….what about Doug Free? why did we draft him again?…..We are better off signing a expereinced FA. That’s what has worked best for us and I don’t see that changing. Jerry is not paying top dollar for a lineman, not happeneing. If we go offense with a high pick it will be a WR. Hopefully, after yesterday Austin is on track to being that speed guy, not sure, if not, we need a serious threat at WR. Crayton is awful, Hurd and Austin are on one year deals so we will most likely be looking for a WR in the draft or FA.

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 12, 2009 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

we should draft a safety

LT in the 2nd round, if Free isn’t good enough

by AustonianAggie on Oct 12, 2009 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

haha a boatload

wasn’t it like a 1st, 5th and massive contract?

by foyesboys on Oct 12, 2009 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nobody just gets a LT

I don’t think Jerry has ever drafted OL in the first round. Besides we need a safety, a LB, maybe a TE or another K.

by birdness on Oct 12, 2009 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree...

There used to be a time when he could go one-on-one against the elite DEs. He has now regressed way too much. I am interested to see how many times they had to leave the TEs in there to help him with the rush. There was talk of switching Bigg to the LT, they need to re-evaluate the OL during the bye week.

by thejanusman on Oct 12, 2009 8:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Flo

I agree Adams is not playing like he did 5 or 6 years ago but I have a theory about the illegal procedure penalties yesterday. We know that Adams has very little hearing in his right ear, the ear toward the quarterback. I think defensive lineman around him are calling out signals mimicking Romo. Remember a couple of games ago Romo complained to the refs that the defensive linemen were doing that. Yesterday you could see that Adams was very up set with both procedure penalty calls against him. I think defensive linemen are causing those movements. Perhaps the play when Adams grabbed the lineman & threw him down was a play where he was being too careful to not move & that caused him to come out late. When he saw that he was beaten so badly, what he did saved Romo from getting killed.

I know that last year Adams started getting the reputation that he could not longer handle speed rushers. I’m convinced that had more to do with his injured left shoulder than him just loosing his abilities.

Adam does have a lot of penalties & I know it is frustrating to us fans, but he’s still a pretty darn good left tackle in my books.

Maybe, Fish can ask around the team to see if defensive linemen are in fact calling out signals to Adams to get him to move.

by geth13 on Oct 12, 2009 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't know about that, very interesting

but Romo isn’t going to get anywhere complaining to refs about defensive players pretending to be him. Maybe it’s a free speech issue? J/k.

by DavidH22 on Oct 12, 2009 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agree with this; great analysis

Still Flo is old and gimpy. It is past time to find his replacement.

by Iowacowboy on Oct 12, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

happy for the win but

the reality is if we had played this way against almost any other team out there we would not have had an overtime opportunity to win. I know Wade seemed to do good things his first year, but really it seems more like the beginning of the first year was a left over team from Parcells and the longer the season went the more they became what they are today…an undisciplined team. I think we have some real good (maybe even great) players whose talent and potential are being wasted with this coaching staff. Even the defense, the only reason Wade is still here, seems to be regressing. Too bad Jerry didn’t think about developing Romo and bring in an offensive guru as head coach and let him find someone out there to run the defensive. There are a lot of good defensive minds out there, not just Wade Phillips.

by cowboyz4ever on Oct 12, 2009 6:59 AM CDT reply actions  

+1

I know Wade seemed to do good things his first year, but really it seems more like the beginning of the first year was a left over team from Parcells and the longer the season went the more they became what they are today…an undisciplined team.

by cow_fanatic on Oct 12, 2009 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

+1000

The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.

by gee-roj on Oct 12, 2009 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Can somebody please inform me

the last time that the Cowboys were a disciplined team? 2003? 1998? Or the Jimmy Johnson days?

by DavidH22 on Oct 12, 2009 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

In Parcells defense...

These guys were much younger back then and you expect that sort of play from younger players. When Wade came in he let them get away with it and away went any sort of continued work on changing those habits.

The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.

by gee-roj on Oct 12, 2009 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

With discipline and better coaching....

this taem could be 5-0. We have the players, but there are way too many stupid mistakes and penalties

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 12, 2009 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe, but its the TOs and the brainfarts of the members of the passing game.

The offense should get better and better. Romo and the recievers will get a better understanding and timing of each other.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Oct 12, 2009 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

My thoughts are.

The defense needs to play a whole game. The line on both sides of the ball need to stop making stupid mistakes (offsides and false starts). Austin is better than people thought, and a “Healthy Choice” is better than a banged up Barber. The talent is there, but the execution is lacking. Like a lot of others here, I think the “Organization” needs to make change. The win feels better than a loss, but if you don’t learn something and take it to the next contest this win will be for naught.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Oct 12, 2009 7:15 AM CDT reply actions  

The results are in

The new Wade is the same as the old Wade. The tougher training camp and focus on eliminating penalties amounted to bubkis.

This team is mentally weak. It self-destructs at every opportunity. There seems to be no discipline. Discipline starts at the top. Until there is a change at the top (in this case GM), there will be no change on the field.

When you look at the talent gap between the Chiefs and Cowboys, there should have been no contest. A disciplined team like the Giants would have pimp-slapped the Chiefs all over the field (which they did). An undisciplined team would commit penalties on 3rd and 26 that let the inferior team stay in the game (which they did).

At least we can’t lose this weekend!

by HutHut on Oct 12, 2009 7:55 AM CDT reply actions  

It's hard to argue with anything you said

As much as I want to pick a fight with you I can’t find anything wrong with your post. Sighs

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 7:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

True Dat: Five Games Makes a Statement

Lack of dicipline and it does start at the top with the GM. We can enjoy being in the hunt but the climb to elite status must start somewhere, sometime. Not sure I see this journey underway.

by Iowacowboy on Oct 12, 2009 8:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's hard to believe Dallas is "in the hunt"

I know we’re all supposed to be eternally optimistic but I don’t see Dallas in the hunt. The 3 teams Dallas has beat are combined 1-13 and yesterday was about as ugly a win as you could see. The team is not getting better, it’s getting worse and has endless signs of a team that is not disciplined (i.e., penalties and dumb mistakes), doesn’t execute consistently, and is poorly coached. 8-8 will be very difficult in my opinion.

I really want to be positive but I just don’t see it.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 8:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

...and the teams we lost to are 10-0.

As long as we are talking “reality”, as bad as the boys have looked, their two losses were both winnable and the teams they lost too are looking pretty elite right now. If the boys can just clean up the mistakes and put some complete games together (admittedly big Ifs), they will be there in the end. It is still all about December for this team, and if they can get there “in the hunt” we can see if they have really changed.

by Dooud on Oct 12, 2009 8:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

Valid point

You’re right, the losses are to teams with really good records. I wish that would make me feel better. When I look at why we lost those 2 games, I see the same issues, poor discipline, stupid mistakes, too many penalties and questionable play calling. That’s why the “good” losses don’t make me feel better. It’s the same symptoms win or lose

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

right now

yes, I agree. They’re an 7-9 team. I know the team they’ve beat are combined 1-13, but they’re beating the teams they’re supposed to, and the 2 teams they lost to are 10-0 right now. They need to prove they can beat a good team. I think facing Atlanta coming off a bye would be a HUGE win for this team.

by Dub_TC on Oct 12, 2009 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

3rd & 26

That penalty call on the 3rd & 26 was totally BS. Ball made a clean hit on the receiver. Hits like that occur in every game. I will be the first to admit that the Cowboys played anything but a good football game yesterday. But, their poor play wasn’t the only pitiful performance on that field. The officials were just as poor.

by geth13 on Oct 12, 2009 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes but

I really believe that the officials are more critical when a team plays sloppy. If you are playing disciplined (or superstar) you tend to get those calls.

by staubachfan on Oct 12, 2009 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Such as?

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Oct 12, 2009 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Here's just three

In overtime Scandrick pass intereference on Bowe on the chief’s last drive on first down. Roughing the passer on Romo with a hit to the head, Olshansky diving at the knees’ of the quarterback

by Deke on Oct 12, 2009 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

I Couldn't Believe

When I saw the replay of Olshansky. That was a dirty, fithy play. Something the Patriots would normally do. I was shocked and disgusted.

by kindablue on Oct 12, 2009 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Discipline starts at the top. Until there is a change at the top (in this case GM), there will be no change on the field.

This is precisely my dilemma this morning. If this is true, what do we do Jerry ain’t going anywhere anytime soon. Do we just muddle around at 7-9/ 9-7 for the next 15 years? Why should I care until Stephen Jones takes over?

by rabblerousr on Oct 12, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

if Jerry was along for the ride then

then he is along for the ride now

No blame / no credit – it works both ways

by BishopWest on Oct 12, 2009 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

big difference, Jerry assembled this mess over the last twelve years, he hired this puppet coach

Jerry hired two good coaches, Jimmy and Bill, but his ego got in the way and Jerry decided he could do better and both left. Jerry hired Jimmy, that’s his credit with regards to the three superbowls and got out of the way and let Jimmy run the organization, assembling coaches and players..

by Deke on Oct 12, 2009 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here's what you do...

You root like hell for Dallas to win and you root like hell for me to be wrong. Also, Dame Fortune plays a role in this League. The Cowboys could luck into a Super Bowl.

by HutHut on Oct 12, 2009 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Look at the Cards

They were unstoppable last year. No they sucked but they did go to the show.

by birdness on Oct 12, 2009 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Winning is better than losing.

The boys win a game that they should have won. That too is good. The same penalties and same soft defense at the end of the game almost cost the team. Until the team begins to show the focus to detail to prevent stupid penalties and mistakes, we will continue on this Jekyl and Hyde rollercoaster ride. HutHut has some solid points. Jerry really does have to look and see if Wade has the ability to do that. I don’t think so.

by oldboysfan on Oct 12, 2009 8:07 AM CDT reply actions  

Is our o-line too fat?

It seems they have to get a head start off the line because they are so tubby.

by quincyyyyy on Oct 12, 2009 8:14 AM CDT reply actions  

Maybe they wouldn't struggle with their blitz pickups

if so many snaps weren’t right at the end of the play clock so that the defense can time their blitz. Why can’t this team get to the line faster and mix up the snap counts to keep the defense guessing?

by WAREwolf94 on Oct 12, 2009 8:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

That is actually a really solid point...

It seems like the other team always knows exactly when to blitz and I think that is a huge part of it. I certainly think the time it takes to get this offense lined up needs to be addressed.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Oct 12, 2009 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wade, Garrett, Penalties? Are these really problems, or outcomes.

All these posts about Wade and Garrett and how they have to go. I kinda buy it sometimes when the Cowboys seemingly run the same delayed draw over and over and over … but for the most part I don’t.

I don’t know if it’s a ‘team too dumb to win’ issue … but an observation I have (that others do as well) is that the team plays to the level of their opponents – nearly all the time. NYG, Denver, KC … all these games were ‘one play away.’ (see Eatman’s most recent post on dallascowboys.com).

I watch the defense in the last 5 minutes of the game against KC … they were completely out of gas – even Jay Ratliff and DeMarcus Ware. Maybe it’s all the result of a ‘bad scheme’ … or ‘an undisciplined team’ …

Or maybe it’s simply the talent level on the team – Romo, Ware, Barber, Ratliff, McBriar. These guys have top-tier talent and can really play that way. Newman’s lost a step, I think we realize that, and Brooking has been a lot of fun, hope he can keep the energy up. But maybe the rest of the team just doesn’t have the one on one football talent to win those ‘one more plays’ more than 50% of the time.

by berkokid on Oct 12, 2009 8:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Now we're to the point

Where our strength and conditioning coach is regressing. How far do the Phillip’s arms of mediocrity reach?

by cow_fanatic on Oct 12, 2009 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Actually

the strength and conditioning coach, Joe Jurazek, has been the same since before Parcells.

There is some credence to the theory that perhaps the december fades have more connection to the strength and conditioning of the team than a particular head coach or coordinator. There’s been one constant through all the december collapses under campo, Parcells, and now Phillips, and that’s the strength coach.

just sayin…

by koreyvkWA on Oct 12, 2009 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree With This Thought

Talent wins out; Dallas has made too many draft day mistakes and too many dumb trades like the Galloway and Roy Williams fiascos. Thus we have Pat Watkins and Andre Gurode and Patrick Crayton etc.

by Iowacowboy on Oct 12, 2009 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

You act like the Boys should start an All-Pro at every position.

That Galloway trade was in the last millenium – get over it. Haynesworth was handled by Gurode to the point that he went on a stompage. Crayton has been hot and cold but Boys should have more explosion flielding punts. Watkins is a backup – big dissapointment for a 5th round pick.

by birdness on Oct 12, 2009 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Cliche

Yes…it’s better to win than lose. For those who want Wade gone now, it’s a phyrric victory at best.

This team is simply not as good as we had hoped. Period. Seriously, what else can be said at this point? Removing the HC mid-season will cause more problems than it solves. There is nothing to do at this point other than hope for improvement.

by Boundforbeach on Oct 12, 2009 8:30 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm not sure I agree

I’m embarrassed to say that somewhere in the back of my mind yesterday I was hoping Dallas wouldn’t pull it out. Conventional wisdom is that firing your coach during the season is never the right thing to do, I’m not so sure. The longer Wade stays, the longer we are all tortured with a team that plays just well enough to tease us but when we’re rational we all know will never take the next step. Unfortunately it would take something like a loss yesterday to a winnless team to even consider making a change. I disagree with some other here that say the team isn’t talented enough to be very good. I think the Cowboys are as talented as just about any team in the league.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Replacement success rate is very low...

Les Pasquarelli did an article on this last year. Since 1970, there were 59 mid-season coaching replacements in the NFL. The winning percentage of the replacement coaches was a pitiful .337 Now some of that is attributable to the fact that the teams were obviously flawed before the change, but I’m not sure that changes the analysis. Getting rid of Wade now may not increase our hopes of making the postseason. If you do it, I think you are bascially acknowledging that the season is over. While things look grim at this point, I don’t think we’re there yet.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=3663418

by Boundforbeach on Oct 12, 2009 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't care if he gets the axe or not.

I want Jerry to light a fire under his lard a$$ and at least threaten it. Wade is freaking blowing the innaugural season of Jerry World. If Wade is too stupid to figure out he is on the hot seat, then Jerry needs to clue him in.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Oct 12, 2009 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

c'mon...

you don’t think Wade already knows he’s on the hot seat? He’s been around this game long enough to know how it works. He may be a mediocre coach, but he’s not stupid.

by Boundforbeach on Oct 12, 2009 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

That is what's sad

Your job is on the line and you still cannot get your team to play as a TEAM because you are incapable to coach improvement.

These wins seem like a result of single-game, individual efforts because you cannot point to anything this team does well as a TEAM.

We have seen this defense play well for the majority of the games and then cannot get a stop at the end. How many times does that happen before you change the scheme? He is incapable of changing that aspect.

by cow_fanatic on Oct 12, 2009 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

But it all comes down to this...

Do you really think the team would have a better chance of reaching the post season if Wade were let go right now? Historically, this has not worked out well for other teams who have made such a change.

by Boundforbeach on Oct 12, 2009 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

I wasn't clear on my opinion I guess

I have written off this year. So I hear you about the winning % of replacements etc. I don’t think this team is headed to the playoffs so I say let’s speed up the process and move along. If you adjust your thinking as I suggest, you might do things like playing Doug Free over Flo so you know what you have going into the draft/free agent season.

I also think there is a possibility someone like John Gruden or Mike Shanahan might beat the odds and take these team and get them to perform at a higher level. One big issue too would be if you fire Wade as HC you also need a DC. I suppose Dave Campo could fill in but that would have to be addressed.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

I pretty much as well....

Yesterday was not a playoff caliber team we were seeing..it was great they got the win, but it was the Chiefs dude….with our talent we shouldve wiped the floor with them. We need a coach upgrade and some help on offense and defense to be able get where we need. It’s really pretty pathetic watching this team at times….

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 12, 2009 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

At 3-2, I just can't do it yet.

Call it stupidity or naivety, I still cling to hope (however misguided) that they are going to put together a run and make some noise in the division. If Wade loses the locker room or they lose the next few games, then I’m with you. But not yet.

by Boundforbeach on Oct 12, 2009 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's not stupidity or naivety

We’re all the same, we’re passionate fans. We WANT to see reasons for hope. I just don’t feel it right now, this has gone on too long with the same patterns of behavior. A light went on for me and it looks pretty clear all of the sudden. The Dallas Cowboys are what they are.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

I am more concerned

about the long-term level of this team then just this year. Whether you make a coaching change now or at the end of the year this team is not playing to the level necessary to make the postseason. And it’s getting worse. We lost the turnover battle again and had a season high 13 penalties. When the hillbilly clown says there are things they need to work on like he does after every game, what are those things. Are they really wokring to improve because it is not shwoing up on game day

by cow_fanatic on Oct 12, 2009 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Appartantly he doesn't.

If he did maybe his defense wouldn’t crap their pants in the last two minutes of three different games this year. “WADE’S” defense let go of 3 leads this year. They played great for 58 minutes and rolled over in the last two minutes. That is not the type of defense fielded by a coach who knows his lard is on the line. And, coaches of elite defenses don’t let crap offenses look like All Pro’s with two minutes left. They don’t 2nd year starters behind a line missing two starters gash them for a TD on 4th and 7. Twice the defense had a chance to finish that game, and twice they failed. That is not what a coach who is motivated by his retention would let happen.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Oct 12, 2009 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Oh No!!!

I can’t see myself ever wishing for a loss. However, a win like this is better for focus then an easy win going.

by staubachfan on Oct 12, 2009 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Cowboys so far…

The pessimist in me looks at yesterday’s win and thinks; they needed overtime to get by a winless team. The pessimist in me also thinks; the 3 teams they’ve beaten have a combined record of 1-13.

The optimist in me thinks; their only two losses came down to the wire against a pair of teams that have combined record of 10-0. And for some reason seeing Denver beat New England in all most the exact same way they beat Dallas a week earlier made me feel much better.

This offensive line has got to be the most penalized unit I have ever seen. Man do I wish that could stop. Now!

The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.

by gee-roj on Oct 12, 2009 8:37 AM CDT reply actions  

I don't agree with that

I do think this team is talented….we do not have the right people at the top to take advantage of the talent. The coaches’ job is to coach a team UP for their games. Our coaching staff does not do that. We watched a team yesterday that had no business being in that game and they almost beat us because their coaches coached them UP for the game. Wade might be a good dc (not even sure about that anymore) but he does not have the personality to lead this team. And as we sit here and watch it all unfold the team is just getting older….at some point the window will close and all talent brought together will be wasted.

by cowboyz4ever on Oct 12, 2009 8:38 AM CDT reply actions  

Maybe this means...

That the team will play better toward the end of the year this season. Reversal of the recent trend is fine with me.
Let the problems show thier ugly head now so that this team can fight through them and get stronger as the season progresses. And a win is a win…..

Anomoly............Finally here.........

by goat3000 on Oct 12, 2009 8:46 AM CDT reply actions  

No disrespect intended

What have you seen that gives you any hope that this team will improve as the season goes on? It’s been the same pattern as last year………….an occasional really good performance mixed in with mostly games of poor execution and discipline. I was saying exactly what you said last year, finding multiple excuses why all the stupid things would stop, and the team just fell apart down the stretch. It’s the same stuff over and over, I just don’t see where you get the idea something will magically change.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

The years we started really hot

I didn’t see anything in September and October to make me think we would fall apart at the end. Maybe those teams got complacent because things were too easy. Maybe it’s not likely but it’s not out of the realm of possibility that our early struggles can unite this team and make them stronger.

by WAREwolf94 on Oct 12, 2009 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thats what the team is saying

All we can do is hope that will happen. I read a quote that Parcells said this team is stupid. I agree with him. It really shows up with the line play. Hopefully that can be coached around. However, they are sticking together without the TO factor. If they gel, we could still have a lot of fun.

by cowboy1966 on Oct 12, 2009 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Indeed

The majority of the game felt like the Rams game last year where the team did not show they were focused or ready to play.

Then we pull it out at the end and all the post game interviews sounds like the Bengals game of last year. We didn’t up, great effort, tried hard, blah blah blah. You don’t get brownie points for trying hard

by cow_fanatic on Oct 12, 2009 9:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why we should get better after the bye week

-MB3 and Felix should be healthy

-Romo finally has a playmaker at WR to throw to

-Roy Williams will now be in single coverage against teams’ second best CB

-Crayton will go back to what he does best… being a slot receiver

-Our defense has been playing well for the past three games and should continue to play well especially with Sensebaugh back.

by quincyyyyy on Oct 12, 2009 8:47 AM CDT reply actions  

Easy on the playmaker

Has there been anything consistent this year. Austin had caught 4 or 5 balls before yesterday for the year. Congrats to him BTW, he seems like a good kid

by cow_fanatic on Oct 12, 2009 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

You Assume

That they will elevate Austin to the number 2 WR spot. I hope they do and move Crayton to the slot. But, I’m not sure they will.

by staubachfan on Oct 12, 2009 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

That is because it would make freaking sense.

It seems that the coaches are doing everything they can to outsmart themselves. How many times has the LB come in and caught a TD? He has 16 for his career, but no one thinks to cover him? What a farce.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Oct 12, 2009 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

12th man

I am going to hijack this thread, or attempt to, for a minute. I was at the game. I live in Kansas City and this was my first Dallas Cowboys game I have ever been able to go to. Having grown up in Texas I realize that is a bit odd to some of you, but its just fate.

Anyway, to my point. That game was like a mini home game for the boys. There were so many Cowboys fans at that game that people were calling into the local sports radio station talking about how pissed they were about it. It was truly impressive.

Thanks to the dedicated that drove the distance to attend the game. We truly were the 12th man yesterday on an ugly away game that could have ended very differently. And thanks to Miles Austin for picking yesterday to show up when we desperately needed it.

endeavor to persevere

by captain caveman on Oct 12, 2009 8:55 AM CDT reply actions  

Definitely

My first game too, and it was amazing how many Cowboys fans there were. My buddy was real disappointed about that too, and I heard on the radio some complaints from Chiefs fans.

by rhodri2112 on Oct 12, 2009 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that's interesting. I was listening to the radio show (while watching

the television broadcast with the sound turned down) and the play-by-play guys were talking about how many Cowboys fans were there and how loud they were. I had no idea there was a large contingent of ’Boys fans in KC.

by Fernie67 on Oct 12, 2009 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Here in Northern VA/DC...

Dallas fans match the Redskins fans in numbers.

~Texas Massacre '09~

by TheHeat on Oct 12, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

I went to school near there and had to deal with Redskins fans all the time, they are terrribbleee. I always hated the Eagles as I grew up in NJ but just a little time with the deadskins fans was enough to change that

by WAREwolf94 on Oct 12, 2009 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

And here I thought the rancid smell in Hopewell was from the paper mill ...

… when it was Redskins fans all along …

Congratulations Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com

by Raul Villaronga on Oct 12, 2009 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was at the Bronco's game

Same thing. Maybe 1/3 of the fans there were wearing Cowboys jerseys.

"Another thing that freaks me out is time. Time is like a book. You have a beginning, a middle and an end. It's just a cycle." -Tyson

by cmr3 on Oct 12, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thanx Caveman

I thought I was losing my mind, cuz I thought I kept hearing DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE chant when our DEFENSE was on the freakin field!!! So that’s really what I was hearing?

Tell me it’s true!!!

Just becuz you put yer boots in the oven don't make it bread

by dcfansinceiwasababy on Oct 12, 2009 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think a lot of people also need to realize that the Cowboy's 2 losses

are to arguably 2 top 5 teams. To compound that, those loses came late in the 4th Q.

Are the Cowboys the Elite of the NFL? No, of course not. They are much closer to the top than most people give them credit for though.

JD’s like, "you want some fucking pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, bitches!"- RCCook

by laxtonto on Oct 12, 2009 9:05 AM CDT reply actions  

-1

They don’t beat 25 teams in the league playing the way they did yesterday which is the same song and dance with the way they played against Carolina.

Those losses came late in the 4th quarter because we couldn’t stop that team on their last possession of the game. That’s also a trend that continued yesterday

by cow_fanatic on Oct 12, 2009 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Anything can happen on Sundays...

In 1992 with our team heading to their first Super Bowl win in in their 4 years run and with one of the most talented rosters that we’ve seen they faced the poor Rams in Dallas and lost a poor played game.

Even poor teams can win on Sundays, that’s why there have been as few winless teams.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Oct 12, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yesterday's near disgrace proves you wrong

We’re a very talented team that is very, very poorly coached. 8-8.

Greetings from the Humungus, the Ruler of the Wasteland, the Ayatollah of Rock and Roll-A. I laugh at your puny plans.

by Lord Humungus on Oct 12, 2009 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Bad execution by the players

makes the coaches look bad. And vise-versa, good player execution makes the coaches look good.

But it’s really more about the players than the coaches. Great players play great regardless of who their coach is. Just consider that some players in the Hall of Fame had bad coaches. In today’s game, All-Pro players, and Pro-Bowl players are invited to Hawaii every year from bad teams with poor coaching.

Coaches definitely have their influence, good and bad. But a great player will excel regardless of the coach.

by BishopWest on Oct 12, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great players will, you are correct.

Great teams are made by coaches. Staubach would have been Staubach without Landry, but the Cowboys would still have been crap.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Oct 12, 2009 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

+1000

The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.

by gee-roj on Oct 12, 2009 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a good thing I don't have a heart condition

Even when I go into a game with no expectations of winning or losing, this team finds a way to suck me back in. From there they manage to get my blood boiling and heart jumping out of my chest. The ups and downs literally make it feel like a roller coaster ride, but frankly, I think I feel a little safer on a roller coaster.

The thing I am concerned with are the mental mistakes. I don’t think they are fixable. We’ve said it every week for many years now. Fix the penalties, fix the mental blunders, fix this, fix that. But look, they’re still here, and it looks like they’re here to stay. If one of you has a way to cope with this, please, make a fanpost. I need some guidance here! The beer just isn’t cutting it anymore.

Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.

by sublimezg on Oct 12, 2009 9:16 AM CDT reply actions  

More mental mistakes to throw in

Crayton not able to fair catch a punt, not the norm from him so it’s a mental mistake
Newman not catching a punt that hits at the 17 and then rolls to the 3, another mental
      mistake
Not a single attempt at a punt return when there were clear return opportunities

And that’s just the punt return aspect.

by cow_fanatic on Oct 12, 2009 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not that Cowlishaw is all that level headed

but he’s calling for a mid-season replacement at coach:

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/spt/columnists/tcowlishaw/stories/101209dnspocowlishaw.324e180.html

I understand just how difficult it would be to institute a new DC but I think there is someone internally or someone in the world unemployed right now that could run this pitiful 3-4 (internal being the most obvious option). Just giving JG the keys would at least spark something. We are so milquetoast in everything we do that at this point you need something like this. Playing for mediocrity sucks and not a very good strategy. This isn’t like years past – there are easily 8 teams in the NFC right now that are markedly better than us. We can’t just marginally get better.

"I just want to comment on how it’s become like a common thing in the [MLB] for guys to fall in love with [the Rangers’s] sloppy seconds." (thanks cstorm)

by ab03 on Oct 12, 2009 9:27 AM CDT reply actions  

Are you serious?

Wade’s unit has been doing great the past 3 games. It’s Garrett who has been screwing things up. His unit comes unprepared week in and week out. You are just out of the frying pan and into the fire with that one. If Wade is getting fired then he better take Garrett with him

If we are hiring from within it better be Joe DeCamillis.

by quincyyyyy on Oct 12, 2009 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

the thing is

we just need someone different. Joe D isn’t a bad choice but I can’t name that many ST coaches that have made the jump. One thing about JG is that he has a good offense but not great at playcalling. Maybe someone on his staff will be better. What I want out of the new coach is someone who brings a new attitude – maybe a sense of desperation. That lockerroom needs a change – JG is the easiest to facilitate that change.

Anyway, it also answers whether JG really is the heir apparent

"I just want to comment on how it’s become like a common thing in the [MLB] for guys to fall in love with [the Rangers’s] sloppy seconds." (thanks cstorm)

by ab03 on Oct 12, 2009 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

If RHG offense is good it is because the players are making plays

and not the playcalling, as you said. How is RHG much different from Wade? Is another laid back coach what this team needs? Change for the sake of change is not good unless it is the right change.

Joe D is a players coach but he is also a motivational coach that can ride players when necessary. That’s the kind of coach this team needs.

by quincyyyyy on Oct 12, 2009 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

you are right ST coaches suck as head coach

I mean just look at the baltimore Ravens they have been miserable since Harbaugh took over [/sarcasm]

by quincyyyyy on Oct 12, 2009 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Gunther Cunningham

Les Steckel

Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced

by tdships on Oct 12, 2009 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

2 ST coaches

Terrible HC’s

Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced

by tdships on Oct 12, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure Gunther was a d-coordinator

but using that argument I can name about 5 bad d-coordnator coaches for every one you name. Point I was making is it is possible to be a ST coach and be a good head coach. Harbaugh proves that.

by quincyyyyy on Oct 12, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Huh?
Wade’s unit has been doing great the past 3 games

Isn’t Wade the head coach? I assume you’re talking about the defense but I’m really concerned with the whole team.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

His defense has only been giving up around 15 points the past few games

And unfortunately, as to your second point, yes he is the head coach but he is too docile and letting Garrett run the offense into the ground. Wade is a great D coordinator, as a head coach he is mediocre at best.

by quincyyyyy on Oct 12, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry, when a guy is the head coach

He doesn’t get a pass from me because he’s doing a decent job as a DC. I agree Garrett’s playcalling was atrocious yesterday. I don’t care though, Wade is the head coach and should be accountable for how the overall team played.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

which is why unless things change he’ll be gone after the season (or if we lose the next four games)

by quincyyyyy on Oct 12, 2009 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

I have no agenda here, but what was so bad about the Offensive playcalling?

We piled up a ton of yardage. A couple of catchable TD balls weren’t, a makable FG is hit and this becomes the runaway victory everyone hoped for/wanted..

Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced

by tdships on Oct 12, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

guess you could make an argument for this game

but for the past 1 and a half years Garrett has sucked.

by quincyyyyy on Oct 12, 2009 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

The 2 most glaring examples for me

1. Very limited use of Tashard Choice despite Barber having a dead leg and Choice running extremely well everytime they gave him the ball

2. Very poor adjustments in the passing game, why so little use of the TE’s?

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

OK

The Choice/Barber issue is valid. But I don’t claim to know what MB3 was telling the coaches or the trainers. In both of the last 2 games, the running attack did shift to Choice in the latter stages.

I think the TE argument is a little overstated when we pass for over 350yds, over 80% of it to WR’s. Remember, just this past week, Romo (and by extension Garrett) was getting criticized for his poor WR production.

Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced

by tdships on Oct 12, 2009 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

When you have the best TE in the NFL

I think you should use him. It’s great some long plays by Austin pumped up the WR numbers. I’m talking about trying to sustain drives prior to late in the 4th Qtr. when the Cowboys scored all their points. I really don’t care what people were complaining about previously, yesterday Witten was basically absent during that stretch.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Defense Has Not Been Great

Before we go too far down that road, the dense has not exactly been lighting anything on fire. Where was the defense on that last drive; where has the intimidating pressure been all season; how about the turnover ration and the sacks and the slashing up the middle runs this D has been surrendering all year? For all the offensive problems, I think the defense has stunk more in many ways.

by Iowacowboy on Oct 12, 2009 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

defense is averaging 15 points a game for the last 3

And if you have to rely on your defense to win the game on the very last drive when they are the most tired then there is something wrong with your offense, because defenses tend to be more tired at the end of games.

by quincyyyyy on Oct 12, 2009 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Cowlishaw Stole this from me

The right thing now would be to remove Phillips during the bye week and give offensive coordinator Jason Garrett – the one-time heir apparent whose career has been a roller coaster ride since 2007 – the final 11 games to see if he can create a sense of urgency as head coach.

by cow_fanatic on Oct 12, 2009 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed!

The last thing we need to have happen is give Wade the rest of the year, only to make Garrett the coach next year. Let Garrett fail too, then we’ll be done with the both of them.

Let’s end this fiasco once and for all.

by Road Warrior on Oct 12, 2009 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree, CF. I want that to happen too...

… However, da King would never ever do that.

Especially not after a win.

It would make him look bad.

Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/

by silverblue5 on Oct 12, 2009 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Like

firing a HC after a super bowl win

by cow_fanatic on Oct 12, 2009 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

That was the old Jerry.

da King’s eff’n ego led him to fire Jimmy-J.

Wade has no ego.

And in a weird kind of way, that soft personality appeals to our owner… much more than a strict requirement of our stupid team to correct mistake after self-inflicted mistake after dumb-a** mistake.

Btw…

Aww man. Why’d U have to bring up the firing of Jimmy-J?

Can I tell you what I did when I heard that news?

I yelled at my car radio (the words below almost verbatim)…

“JONES YOU’RE A [EXPLETIVE] IDIOT! YOU [EXPLETIVE] [EXPLETIVE]!!! I [EXPLETIVE] HATE YOU!!! YOU [EXPLETIVE] MORON!!! I’LL NEVER FORGIVE YOU FOR THIS!!! WE COULD’VE HAD A DYNASTY AND YOU RUINED IT!!! [EXPLETIVE] YOU!!! YOU SUCK!!!”

What was your immediate response?

Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/

by silverblue5 on Oct 12, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

About the same

except I was in soneone else’s car

by cow_fanatic on Oct 12, 2009 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes. And if Jimmy was coaching, they don't lose that NFC Championship game in Frisco with Steve Young as the Niners QB.

Jimmy-J would’ve had something up his sleeve and prepared them better.

Can I tell you frustrating that was looking at Switzer’s dumb look on the sidelines when SF jumped out in front early?

I remember hating Deion (who played for San Fran at the time) that game, hating Jones, hating Switzer, and hating Aikman for those dumb INTs he threw.

Oh yeah, I also hated that cruddy Candlestick Park turf that was tore up with all that mud from the rain before da game.

But you’re right, Sean. Even though you could consider it a dynasty, it should have been FOUR IN A ROW.

Then I wouldn’t have to keep hearing my idiotic friend remind me that the Niners were the first team to win five Super Bowls.

Like that has any relevance to anything.

Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/

by silverblue5 on Oct 12, 2009 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL

Getting into a drunken dust up over pride; after that team played out in several years, Jerry has done nothing in the draft or on the field. Nothing.

by Iowacowboy on Oct 12, 2009 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

A win is a win, where have I heard that before

One year ago, Dallas barely beat the pathetic Bengals after the cowboys played another sloppy mistake prone game. Now one year later, you seen the exact same sloppy mistake prone play by this team in Kansas city, and some people think this is a big win…..really!!!! Beating a chief’s team that has won 2 games in their last thirty is considered a big win, WOW!!!

Teams that don’t learn from their mistakes, are destined to repeat it, and the cowboys are in that pattern.

Some would say, but we lost to two undefeated teams, and we could of won both, ofcource with the if’s and what’s were crackers and nuts theory, heard that all of last two years too, what’s changed???

Since starting out 12-1 in 2007, the cowboys are two games above five hundred, that’s an average team in my book, not anywhere close to being a top notch team

The window is closing for this team, it peaked two years ago, there should of been a coaching overhaul after last season, but Jerry wouldn’t allow his ego to admit his mistake, so the cowboys have wasted another year, this is the lost year for the cowboys. Wholesales changes are coming after this year, a year too late IMO..

yeah, a win is a win, keep telling yourselves that after watching the theater of the absurd yesterday, I heard the same last year after the Bengals games, a win is a win Deke, where did that get us, I’ll tell you, it will be the same this year….another year of poor play and out of the playoffs,

by Deke on Oct 12, 2009 9:38 AM CDT reply actions  

last season injuries killed us

If we stay healthy, this team will improve and get better. Like Romo says, it’s a process and it won’t happen overnight. The players just have to keep believing in themselves and one another and special things will start happening.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 12, 2009 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

that's cute

but unrealistic. Cowboys have serious issues and better teams will take advantage of us.

by quincyyyyy on Oct 12, 2009 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Its not unrealistic at all

The team will get better IMO.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 12, 2009 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

We all want that

What evidence do you have that it will happen? Are they getting progressively better each week? To me it’s going the other way, maybe I’m missing something everyone else is seeing.

I want to win the lottery and really hope it happens. I see no evidence it will happen though.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sure I see evidence of progress

For example, last week Romo and Austin weren’t on the same page on the INT that probably cost us the game, but this week they were in sync. To me, that is definite progress.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 12, 2009 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

OK, technically everything didn't go wrong yesterday

On a micro level there was something positive you could take from yesterday’s game. If that makes you or others feel good then I’m happy for you. To me it’s more like 1 step forward and 2 steps back. I could find 5 things that are worse now than the beginning of the season. Whatever. The body of evidence, the trends and direction of the team are not positive.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

what are those 5 things??

I’m curious because I don’t see that we’re getting worse at all. Frankly, it’s all in your prospective regardless.

Negative fans like Deke will always see the flaws and harp on them, positive fans like myself always see the good in their play and focus on that.

Bottom line is that no fan knows what this team is yet, that will be determined over the next 4 games IMO.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 12, 2009 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Another significant improvement

is how our defense couldn’t sack anyone or generate turnovers. They definitely seem to be improving there

by WAREwolf94 on Oct 12, 2009 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

For the first 58 minutes anyway.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Oct 12, 2009 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Worse yesterday

1. Penalties 2 Running game 3 QB protection 4 play calling 5 Penalties (yep, I’m counting it twice. It is off the chart bad and getting worse).

I really can’t believe anyone can look at that performance yesterday and think the trend is improving. The first game of the year the Cowboys dominated the Giants offensively and while you won’t admit it 1 guy lost the game for them. Despite that loss, there was a lot to be excited about because Dallas looked like the better team and the Giants looked like the luckier team. Yesterday they were outplayed for most of the game and were lucky to win against a winless team in OT.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Using your logic you won't know any more in 4 games

There will always be something to point to that worked even in a loss. Yesterday you point to Austin’s production. It’s the NFL, a team will always have 1 bright spot. I think my assessment is just as valid now as any you will make a month from now. Dallas has beaten 3 teams with combined records of 1-13 and lost to 2 teams combined 10-0. In 2 of the losses and 1 win the defense has not made a critical stop at the end to win the game. Penalties and discipline are getting progressively worse and the Cowboys are not particularily beat up compared to other teams (really only 1 significant injury).

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Always a bright spot

What’s the Brown’s bright spot – both compleations.
What’s the Redskin’s bright spot – Portis isn’t hurt?

The Boys played the teams on the schedule. They controlled the first half against the Bronco’s but didn’t put up points. The game went to the final series. They also controlled the Gmen – who could predict that freak bounce off Witten’s foot?

The Boys are not the worst 3-2 team in the league.

by birdness on Oct 12, 2009 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't see too much difference between now and when we began the season

I think you’d be hard pressed to say we’re doing worse. Offensively, when the oline didn’t kill us, we moved the ball with ease – thats the same thing as the panthers game. And the bucs game. In our 2 bad games, romo really sucked. Thats pretty consistent to me.

Our run D looks very legit right now. Our run O looks worse, but personally, ithought those first three games may’ve been an abberation at the time so its not a shock. Our pass D also looks much better than it did in week 1.

Our defense has consistently played for 55 minutes lol…

What killed us yesterday was a couple turnovers in the first half, neither of which are your common dallas cowboys turnovers (Crayton has probably fumbled 3 punts the last 3 years and I can’t remember the last poor snap exchange i’ve seen with romo). That combined with an extra large dose of oline penalties put us way behind the 8 ball and we took a while to climb out of that. Aside from the oline, i thought we played pretty well overall.

by foyesboys on Oct 12, 2009 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Im with you terry

An ugly win like this adds up at the end of the year. Everyone was laughing at the Eagles last year for the TIE the had…..that ugly game got them into the playoffs ahead of US!!! Now we deffinately need to compose ourselves and cut out these stupid penalties but if start on a roll we need every win good or ugly to play in JAN..

American by birth, COWBOYS FAN by the grace of God.

by jgoddard8409 on Oct 12, 2009 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

at least we have....

one receiver that has break away speed! !!!Go M.A!!!!! Overstating the obvious , we need to get him the ball more going foward!!

by fiverings37 on Oct 12, 2009 10:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Why blame Wade?

Sure five guys jumped offsides five different times. Did the whole team? No…what about the guys who didn’t jump offsides? Apparently Wade is getting through to some, but some are just dumbheads! I watched Ware jump one time and Stephen Bowen stayed firm in his stance.

by TheCowboyFan on Oct 12, 2009 10:35 AM CDT reply actions  

Fumbles gave the Chiefs

10 points to start the game, without which they don’t even come close to sniffing a victory, much less taking it to overtime. The overall performance of the offense and defense was certainly riddles with miscues, but I don’t think it was as bad as some make it out to be.
Still, I am concerned about:

1. The WR core: Yes Austen shows some promise, but our WRs don’t scare anybody, at least not yet this season. With such a good running game, why isn’t the passing game opening up more? Why do we see so few long passes? (It doesn’t seem like the offense stretches the field vertically like it has in past years, with most throw relatively short.)
2. The intelligence of the team: how can the defense line up or jump offsides so many times on a single drive by the opponent? Why are we wasting timeouts because players aren’t lining up correctly? Can safety’s avoid illegal hits that sustain drives that would otherwise be stopped?

I liked:
1. Fullback “Cricket” did a great job lead blocking, as did Witten, springing our backs for good gains.
2. Romo threw the ball away when nothing was there or took the sack, and he was accurate with his other throws, and ended with 2 TDs and 0 ints.
3. Choice is the best 3rd back in the league, and probably the best #2 for most teams. Thank God we’ve got him!
4. Defense is getting good pressure and coverage looks tight most of the time. Several key stops (would have been nice if TNew had caught that int or that we hadn’t gotten the illegal hit call on 3rd and 26)
5. Special teams promises much better field position advantage for us this year, though Folk seems to have lost some confidence.
6. Austen may be our #2 WR that we’ve been looking for. Maybe.

by Teacher on Oct 12, 2009 10:36 AM CDT reply actions  

Fans and media obsess about energy and percieved effort

which accounts for some positive results at the collegiate level and below

But in Pro Football it’s Talent #1, Scheme #2 and Execution #3. I am flipping the script on this team and stating it has the ability to lose against anyone – pretty much the opposite of what I’ve believed the prior 2 seasons. How did this happen?

First you have to examine a Defense that consistently fails to rise to the occasion with the game on the line. I would love to see any analysis of the game winning/tying drives by NYG, DEN and KC to understand the scheme and execution. Because if it shows to be neither, then it must be the talent. However, I am inclined to conclude(without that analysis)that it is a combination of Talent(Hamlin now the DB Liability with an ample assist from the Nickle LB)and scheme. And since the former MR Fix-it’s arrival, his supposed strength is our weakness.

At this point, this team has shown me it cannot get out of it’s own way sufficiently to succeed this year. The Hierarchy in the NFL is Elite, Above Average, Good, Mediocre, Bad and Awful. I can’t tell which of the middle 2 we are, but the trend is decidedly down, not up.

I learned after seeing the Colts game, part of the 2 minute drill they practice is handing the ball to the Umpire after a play, to save time because he places it at the LOS for the snap. Would this even occur to our coaching staff ? I’m not even going to ask if we could actually perform that, because I don’t feel our players have the mental wherewithal to pull it off.

And that’s my last point – dumb players make dumb plays. We’ve made soooo many dumb plays for so long, that problem is too obvious. And it persists because you can’t fix Stupid.

So what to do? Try to salvage this year? Of course, but I’m not hopeful. But we can’t saddle next year and the year after with the burden of keeping status quo now. Because it will only extend the underperformance that permeates this organization. I can only conclude that Wade must go. Make Garrett HC so we can find out if we have one. He’ll continue to call the plays, probably elevate Sherman to OC. Make Campo the DC. Is this optimal ? Of course, not, but you can’t let best get in the way of better. More than anything, change the dynamic. Force the team to play smarter, but not tolerating, much less making excuses for dumb play. At least we’ll find out if any part of this current coaching staff is worth keeping or we start all over next year.

Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced

by tdships on Oct 12, 2009 10:36 AM CDT reply actions  

and out of those three

it’s really all about execution because the talent and schemes in the league are close from team to team for the most part.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 12, 2009 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Make Garrett the HC...

and it will be the same thing next year. The more things change, the more they stay the same. It’s not Wade. It’s the players. Just like Parcells said…dumb people do dumb things. You’d have to get rid of the dumb players. Case closed.

by TheCowboyFan on Oct 12, 2009 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Grizz

You are the voice of reason, sir.

And I always love how you keep things in perspective.

Yes, I too will take the win.

Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/

by silverblue5 on Oct 12, 2009 11:08 AM CDT reply actions  

If so much of our problems are discipline related,

what would you guys think of cutting a player? Didn’t Jimmy Johnson once cut a player mid season who made a big mistake? And not just someone buried on the depth chart but a real contributor?

Maybe something like that could get this team’s attention. If Curtis Johnson gets healthy I’d be interested to see what would happened if Wade cut someone like Barbie after another deer in the headlights tackle attempt.

by WAREwolf94 on Oct 12, 2009 11:14 AM CDT reply actions  

The only one I can remember off the top of my head was Curvin Richards

but he wasn’t a “real contributor”

Dallas has been known as a team who will cut a lesser player to try to make a point. They cut Running Back Curvin Richards a few years ago for a couple of fumbles. Emmitt Smith sure wouldn’t have been cut for the same offense.k

link

by BishopWest on Oct 12, 2009 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

The best thing about this week’s win is that it comes right before the bye. I say this because honestly, there were some small improvements from the Broncos game (Romo to Austin, pressure on QB), but ultimately there are a good amount of things this team needs to address with the same vigor that it approached fixing the run defense after the Bucs game and the passing game after last week’s Broncos game (I assume there was a lot of extra work put in for the passing game this week based off of Miles Austin’s post game interview). Hopefully this extra week will allow some of these adjustments to be made.

The adjustments that I would like to see made:
1) Tashard has to get more carries early in the game. I love Barber and his style, but I think it is by now obvious that we need to save him a little and utilize him more near the end of games where pass protection and his closing ability are at a premium.

2) Something has to be done about the nickel backer spot. I don’t know if that means allowing Brooking the chance to be a three down LB (which I will say looks pretty attractive right about now) or giving Jason Williams some snaps, but clearly Bobby Carpenter is not the right fit. He is awful in run protection and he has blown many tackles that other LBs would make. I wanted to see what he had, but it is clear that he doesn’t have the necessary ability.

3) With Michael Hamlin just about healthy (at least if you believe the initial prognosis), I would love for him to get some snaps at SS instead of Watkins. By all accounts M. Hamlin has quite a nose for the ball (look at his INT totals at Clemson) and would I think add some playmaking ability to a secondary that will be exploited badly if Watkins has to cover guys like Tony Gonzalez for any length of time.

4) Lastly, I would like to see some experimentation with punt returners. Crayton is (usually) solid and should used around the goal line, but I would be interested to see how a guy like Scandrick with his speed and desire to help the team would do in the PR position. He came out of college labeled an effective punt returner with deceptive speed and I think would provide a nice shot in the arm to special teams (a part of the game he really excels in).

Obviously, all these changes revolve around personnel, and not more obvious changes like less mental mistakes (looking at you Flozell) , but I think these changes could make us better in all phases of the game independent of this team’s IQ.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Oct 12, 2009 11:32 AM CDT reply actions  

I agree with almost everything...

I would only add that penalties absolutely has to be addressed. This has been going on to long. The penalties that we get from playing aggresively I can stomach. It is the pre-snap and technique penalties that drive me crazy and must be minimized.

Secondly, turnovers…turnovers…turnovers. It must be emphasized to our players (Romo most importantly) that turnovers in general are unacceptable, but most importantly when they occurr deep inside our own territory. We are giving away too many points. Generally speaking, our defense has been playing some pretty good football lately but we need to quit giving the game away or letting “inferior” opponents stay in game with turnovers that so easily lead to points.

Beware D-Ware

by WittenRocks on Oct 12, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

if you want penalties addressed

then you want different players on the oline. I personally think it starts with flo and gurode. I think we need to give free a shot – we have to see what he has. Flozell is part of the reason we have been a mediocre team these last 25 or so games. We can’t just put him out here and hope he doesn’t get 3 penalties in a game.

As for the dline, i don’t know what the heck happened yesterday. That was ridiculous. But it was not normal, which is why i’m willing to excuse it.

by foyesboys on Oct 12, 2009 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

So we put Free out there to see

Free makes one mistake – one and Romo get blind sided – season over. You really want to just see? Flo may have lost a step but at least he’ll trip a DE before that guy gets a free shot on Romo.

by birdness on Oct 12, 2009 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Flo - yes; Gurode - no

This season on penalties for the OL

Adams – 7 for 51 yards
Colombo – 2 for 15
Gurode – 2 for 15
Kosier – 1 for 10
Davis – 1 for 10

by BishopWest on Oct 12, 2009 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

There's somethin' happenin' here...what it is ain't exactly clear...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Oct 12, 2009 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Can only speak for myself....

but what I see is a BAD football team. Top to bottom. At least they aren’t waiting until December to break our hearts.

by Road Warrior on Oct 12, 2009 11:46 AM CDT reply actions  

if we are bad

then the giants and broncos are jsut barely better than bad.
There is not a big difference in this league from 7 wins to 11. It generally comes down to executing 3-5 plays a game better honestly. Plus some luck. 3-5 plays could change our record anywhere form 1-4 to 5-0.

by foyesboys on Oct 12, 2009 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Didn't we see a team receiving yardage record

That was crap. Throwing all those balls to an untested, undrafted WR – Red Ball should be fired for calling those plays. I don’t think Romo even looked for Witten and why would Barber ever come out of the game? Actually he was in there too long.

by birdness on Oct 12, 2009 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I keep reading that Romo overthrew receivers several tims in ESPN, SI, and the like...

Did that really happen? Or did he have a few overthrows that even the great Peyton Manning has every game? Cause I read here that Romo was good.

And if Romo was good, why aren’t we talking a little more about it?

by blee on Oct 12, 2009 12:16 PM CDT reply actions  

Brady overthrew a wide open Moss yesterday as well

It happens to every qb, you can’t be perfect on every pass.

BTW, Romo was good yesterday, really good, he kept us in the game when things looked bleak.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 12, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Even though the KC secondary isn't too good...

…Romo was under duress right? I just want to know how I should feel about Romo now. Was he a checkdown Charlie or did we see the confident almost reckless gunslinger of old?

Somewhere in between right? Damn, I hate missing Dallas games.

by blee on Oct 12, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

to me he was vintage 2006 romo

but thats because our oline was doing him no favors. He was making constant quick moves in the pocket to buy time and generally pretty accurate.

by foyesboys on Oct 12, 2009 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

he was very good yesterday

he missed a couple passes yes, but he was far more accurate than he was in the bucs, giants or broncos games. When you consider he was running for his life out there, i thought he played very well

by foyesboys on Oct 12, 2009 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

On Sportscenter, they were talking about how well he played. He had a couple of

passes that were catchable in the endzone, even if a bit overthrown. Actually, his passing stats would have looked even gaudier if the receivers hadn’t been dropping passes left and right in the first half. He looked good.

by Fernie67 on Oct 12, 2009 7:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

the best thing about those throws that weren't caught

is that they were well away from the defenders

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Oct 12, 2009 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

THE BOTTOM LINE: Cowboys are an average team and changes NEED to be made.

The first that has to go:
Wade Phillips.

As a head coach, WP has done little to make this team worthy of a championship. 2007 now seems almost like a fluke. The fact is, the Giants were and still are the better team. Until a SERIOUS head coach comes here and teaches these guys fundamentals, the Cowboys will remain average. Jason Garrett is NOT the answer for HC. He has proven that his play calling can NOT be depended upon at crunch time. I like JG but he’s not head coaching material.

Changes to the Defense. We can’t even seriously entertain the thought of a Super Bowl until our Defense plays to a championship caliber. Yesterday’s OT win at KC shows how far we are from that. DW had at least 20 sacks last year. Where has he been? Yes, I concede the double teaming but a talent like DW HAS to get to the qb for this team to win.

Our secondary is in serious need of revamping. Newman is overrated. He gets beat on the deep ball too much. He’s also injury prone. Look how long Champ Bailey and Darryl Greene have played and HOW they’ve played. Both will be in the Hall one day. Can we say the same about Newman?

Our offensive line needs more discipline. Flozelle Adams needs to go. This team makes too many penalties to be considered a good team. Romo has to be consistent for this team to win. That means NO turnovers and his decision making has to keep improving.

RB’s. Choice, Barber and Jones are great but injury prone. Choice should start at RB with Barber and Jones coming in the rotation. Barber’s running style will not allow him to be a 4 quarter running back. His body simply can’t take the punishment. Choice is also a bruiser but with more speed. Jones is the break-away threat needed in the fourth quarter and along with Barber as the closer, this team should be raking in the yards each game.

WR’s. Austin should be starting along side Crayton. Put RW in the slot and his strength is the slant and fade.

Get a defense to stop the run and let a re-tuned offense do it’s thing, and the "Boys would be unstoppable. Until then, we will be mired in mediocrity.

by Cowboy88 on Oct 12, 2009 12:19 PM CDT reply actions  

some good pts

But you want Crayton to start?

It’s Wade’s fault that Newman’s not a HOF corner? (Or that he isn’t 6’3’’ so that he could stop those passes to Brandon Marshall?)

I agree it’s on the coaching staff for not doing more to keep Barber healthy (no one but Felix’s fault on his injuries). You KNOW Barber breaks down, yet you give Choice 1-3 carries until Felix gets hurt? Unbelievable.

by blee on Oct 12, 2009 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

who would you start at WR?

It’s Newman’s fault entirely. He lacks both the speed and hands to make a great DB. Choice SHOULD be the starting RB. I really have a hard time understanding why they can’t seem to get that through their heads. Well…with WP, I suppose I can. Bubba is as Bubba does. You let Choice loose and he’s liable to rip off a good number of 100 yd games, as long as he stays healthy.

by Cowboy88 on Oct 12, 2009 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Barber

when healthy has looked better to me than Choice. I think Barber deserves to be given the title of “starter” but I do agree Choice needed to get more carries.

I would start Roy and Austin.

by blee on Oct 12, 2009 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree But We Need To Start With

A real GH. This GM must be given the authority to hire the HC and run the draft and select the free agents. The GM and the HC must be given the authority to hire the coordinators. Then the other staff positions are filled. It is this type of heirarchy that instills fear in the players because lower level coaching is on the hook for performance. This is organizational dicipline that creates a dynasty like the Patriots or the Cowboys under the regime of Tex, Tom and Gil. Jerry must fire himself and hire a GM; this is the first step to recovery.

by Iowacowboy on Oct 12, 2009 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're right but realistically JJ isn't going to resign those repsonsibilities anytime soon.

But when he does, Stephen Jones will be installed. Now, whether SJ will hire a GM to take over football operations is anyone’s guess. So in the meantime, the only changes from the organization that realistically make any sense would be to get a new head coach.

by Cowboy88 on Oct 12, 2009 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Enough about this with Jerry Jones

He did hire Bill Parcells who picked his players and did everything a GM does except negotiate salaries. The only player who BP probably didn’t want was T.O. and I cannot say I am sorry T.O. was ever a Cowboy. I read somewhere also afterwards that BP was onboard with the decision to bring T.O. and he still did not deliver a SB or even a playoff win……..so? who do we blame now?

I think we just have to get lucky and get a coach who can either motivate this stupid bunch or who can draft better players. The stupidity we have to overcome everyweek from Nemwan, Flo, Crayton or whoever deicdes to stink it that week is what’s killing us. I still believe we have not lost to anybody but ourselves. We’re a good team talent wise but a stupid team……

by ManTab on Oct 12, 2009 1:20 PM CDT reply actions  

agreed. I never like BP mainly cuz he was up in NY all those years and I still think the BiGGEST jerk in the NFL but....

Until we get CONSISTENCY on this team of playmakers who make plays on both sides of the ball, we can expect an awful lot of what happened this past Sunday. An average team playing average ball. Dropped passes, the occasional turnovers, missed tackles, penalties galore and a head coach saying " I don’t know what happened out there".

Until all of that nonsense stops, and I don’t see it stopping anytime soon, it’s gonna be a long season.

by Cowboy88 on Oct 12, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

I trully believe Jerry Jones has done everything he can for the Cowboys.

He hired Jimmy and Parcells. Switzer was not a bad option at the time, Gailey was an offensive genius with Pitt before coming to us. Then Campo (he f^&$ed on this one….) and then Bill Parcells. I can’t blame him. He has trully made the effort. he has signed the big time free agents like Deion and T.O…has he been wrong?

I can’t blame the guy for not giving up negotiating slaaries and contarcts with his own moeny. These are not peanuts we’re talking about so I have to deffend him because I would not give up those rights either. But Football wise he has given the administration to his coaches.

by ManTab on Oct 12, 2009 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

oh please......Switzer was a JOKE on this team. Switzer remains a Joke. If you want proof...I

I ask you to watch the “Dumb & Dumber” game in Philly that year….that’s all you need to know about Switzer as a head coach in the NFL.

by Cowboy88 on Oct 12, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

Jerry has always been great from a business sense, and since the 3 superbowls he has constantly tried to be good at the football part too. Initially he splurged a lot and spent a lot of money on FAs, just like everyone else in the NFL. Once the league realized that wouldn’t work, he checked his ego and brought in Parcells to build a team from the ground up. That didnt work out, not because Jerry’s ego forced him out, but because Parcells was sick of being here (like his past stops) and had lost touch with the players.

The talented team Parcells built wasn’t happy with the vanilla, 2 gap responsibilities and strict atmosphere, so Jerry adapted again and went out and got Wade, an attacking 3-4 guru and player’s coach. When the team faltered last year, Jerry didn’t vainly pull the plug but went out and got the players and coaches Wade wanted.

To me, Jerry is continuously learning from his mistakes and has always made the effort to adapt to what he thinks will work in the NFL. It’s not his fault that these players have had the same stupid problems no matter who is coaching them.

by WAREwolf94 on Oct 12, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

At times he does

At others he gets burned. He played quite well against Steve Smith.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 12, 2009 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

god if miles can be consistant

Roy. Witten marty b.Miles

Felix, choice, barber

That is a whole hell of a lot of options, lot of huge if’s here, I just wish garrett wouldn’t get so cute. Why wasn’t choice in more, why can’t we simply LOB a pass to martellus, I’m not talking back shoulder fade I am talking jump ball!

Man if miles can put together another good game. That opens so many things like 7 in the box for our box 1 on 1 w witten or roy. Please miles, don’t be an abberition(sp?).

by TONYINCC on Oct 12, 2009 2:00 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

If we can keep everyone upright...

the offense should be able to score 30 points a game. So many options in the pass and run with Felix and Roy back and MBIII ready. If they don’t stop the brain farts on both sides of the ball it won’t matter. The defense did a good job till the end of the 4th quarter and then they had there let down, I guess thats the norm for them. Romo had a good game and could have been better with a few less drops. If Austin is for real watchout, this team could go somewhere. The glass is half full this week.

PLAYOFFS!! PLAYOFFS!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 12, 2009 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Holding calls kill drives

Instead of third and 2 is third and 12.

by birdness on Oct 12, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

so does passing when you should run

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Oct 12, 2009 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

they were uncharacteristically

moronic. Usually you can count on the ol for that stuff. The D generally only gets offside when Ware jumps early and the refs think hes offsides but hes really not lol. Yesterday, EVERYONE was offsides. There were a couple lining up in the neutral zone calls too.

by foyesboys on Oct 12, 2009 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Miles Austin is very impressive coming

out of his breaks. No wonder he was open last week against Denver. Instead of Hurd, we should’ve been focusing on Austin. His cuts on his routes are so quick, nobody can hang with that unless they guess which way he’s going to cut.

I was very impressed with Austin’s catch where he went up to fight for the ball. His hunger yesterday was off the charts. His speed is what the O has been missing.
Garrett needs to game plan around Austin and make the D gameplan for him. With his speed/quickness, he will beat his guy more times than not. Make the D’s saftey shadow him, this will open up other areas in the passing game.

Picking up Brooking was a great FA pickup by Jerry. Guy is holding this D together. Wish we had more like him. Great leader.

Ware got a few sacks yesterday, but the guy still isn’t looking the same as last year. Seems a step slower for some reason. He needs to step it up more consistently as does Spencer. We need pressure from the edges. Being last in the NFL on getting the other teams off the field on 3rd downs is wearing our D down. Ratliff is not going to last playing at a high level if we don’t get the O’s off the field.

Our O line is concerning me at this time. They appear to be wearing down as the season goes. That’s been their demise the last few years. They start out good and then the grind of the season just wears them down. Age could be a factor. Romo is having to improvise more and more each game because the protection is getting worse. Being tired factors into the mental mistakes they are making.

News flash for Garrett. If Barber isn’t 100%, use Choice more often. You can do it. Don’t be afraid. Next game if I were Garrett, I start Choice and ride him often, sprinkled with Felix for 3 quarters and then bring Barber in for the 4th quarter. The extra rest would do Barber and Felix some good.

Thank goodness for the bye week. Time to get healthy, rest, re-focus and iron out some kinks. Who knows, but this last game could be the game that kick starts our team. KC having the ball at mid field in OT with a 1st and ten, could have been the turning point in the season. All KC needed was 15 yards and then they were in range of the FG. The D made a statement stopping them cold and then got the ball back and scored. That right there in my opinion was the season if they didn’t stop them.

by T Zig on Oct 12, 2009 3:08 PM CDT reply actions  

Remined me of Michael Irvin

The catch where Miles wrestled the DB for the ball reminded me of Michael.

He " owned" the ball when it was in the air. Seeing Miles show that attitude was great, and hope for the future.

Agree on his route running. Seeing another clip on the Broncos game certainly reinforced his
cutting ability.

Work in Ogletree and we have 2 receivers who can do that with speed, and we become very dangerous…..

by oldtimer on Oct 12, 2009 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good point.

Can’t think of a receiver we’ve had since Irvin that would fight for the ball. And I would love to see Ogletree get a shot. At least he was activated yesterday.

by illcowboy on Oct 12, 2009 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Don't be so quick about Ogeltree.

All he has really done is look good in Preseason. That’s nothing. Until he makes plays in regular season games, there’s no need to start him. Let him work himself into the starting lineup and then we’ll see.

by Cowboy88 on Oct 12, 2009 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

he still looked good against a vet corner

Even though it was pre season he still looked good.

I like his hustle, and speed.

by oldtimer on Oct 12, 2009 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Highlights I saw :

Austin broke Bullett Bob’s record,

Choice needed more touches

Flozell should be rotated or benched

Romo led a nice comeback

Try a new return man

Dallas won their 1st regular season game at Arrowhead

Uniforms of both teams were pretty cool

Need to target Witten more

Have to play better than that to contend in the NFC East

Good defensive pressure

by WarWolf on Oct 12, 2009 7:50 PM CDT reply actions  

+1

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Oct 12, 2009 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Omarav_small
The 17 Years Myth
09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Bedtime Stories Part 1: What KMAAN
222724_1014143404454_1551120017_30067740_5911_n_small
2012: Random Thoughts about Anything but a Quiet Offseason
Demarco_murray_st_louis_rams_v_dallas_cowboys_baxpocve6rkl_small
Headed in the Right Direction...(Delusional or Reality)
Small
X's and O's... More Basics... Cover 3...

Recent FanPosts

Small
Before we rip Mike Jenkins
Small
Jenkins Or Spencer
Small
Beat the Pass Rush
Small
Romo and the Super Bowl Question
Small
Cowboys players under 25 are more valuable than Eagles and Giants

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

2012-05-23_14-43-22_987_small KD Drummond

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Contributing Writers

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dallas_cowboys_nike_gloves_small Archie Barberio

Even_better_tom_small Tom Ryle

2011_07160126_small CotySaxman

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui

Sean_lee_small NYHorn