The VRR: Cowboys Special Teams Getting More Special; Miles Austin Awarded
Special teams coach Joe DeCamillis has done an outstanding job for the Cowboys since joining the team during the offseason. Through five games, his coverage units have held opponents to 7.8 yards on punt returns and 20.8 on kickoffs. On the flip side of that, the Cowboys average only 7.3 yards on their own punt returns and turn in a decent, but not spectacular, 23.7 yard average on kick returns.
Enter Allen Rossum. The veteran return specialist will sign today with the Cowboys and should help Coach Joe D bring more balance to his units.
Rossum is the latest in a chain of "DeCamillis Guys" to come to Dallas since the special teams czar was brought in this off-season and the Cowboys made a new commitment to improving their kicking game.
The coach was heavily involved in the war room on draft day, and his Jacksonville experience encouraged the Cowboys to bring in Gerald Sensabaugh and Chauncey Washington.
More VRR after the jump.

By all the roster churning this season, Calvin Watkins thinks that the Dallas coaches are sending a message to the players.
Under Bill Parcells, the Cowboys constantly churned the bottom of the roster and worked out players. That practice slowed when Wade Phillips took over as coach. Phillips believed once the roster was set, he didn't want to change it. But after last season's 9-7 finish, Phillips has changed things.
The Cowboys have made nine roster moves since the start of the season -- two more than this time last year. That will rise to 10 when Rossum signs.
Patrick Crayton could be back to being a backup on both offense and special teams.
Wade Phillips wouldn’t say it on Monday but it sounded like Miles Austin would be starting at one of the receiver spots. Phillips said he expects Austin to be playing as much as he did last week, when he made his first start for an injured Roy Williams. While Phillips didn't say how it would all shake out, one can only assume it means Crayton might be going back to the No. 3 receiver.
And now with the Cowboys expected to sign veteran return specialist Allen Rossum, it would appear Crayton could be losing his punt return duties as well.

Cowboys fans: go here to vote for Miles Austin's game-winning catch as Sprint's Can't-Miss Play for Week 5. Doing so also enters you in a contest to win Super Bowl tickets.
Vote each week for a chance to win one of 17 trips to Super Bowl XLIV!
Voting opens every Tuesday beginning at 3 p.m. ET and closes every Saturday at 3 p.m. ET. Check back weekly to see which Sprint Can't-Miss Play was the winner.
The play is NFL Total Access' top play of Week 5.
Austin has already been named the NFC's offensive player of the week.

Prior to Sunday's game at Arrowhead, Tony Romo was the inconsistent part of the passing game. While he looked to have recovered much of his accuracy, the receivers sort of fell apart.
Dropped passes were a huge problem against the Chiefs. Austin had two passes he should have come up with in the end zone. Crayton had a drop and a near fumble. Sam Hurd had a drop in the end zone. And Jason Witten let quarterback Tony Romo down by not coming up with a deep pass in the second half. It would have been a tough catch. But it was one a Pro Bowler like Witten should come up with.
Even if Marion Barber and Felix Jones return from the bye week healthy, the Cowboys plan to incorporate Tashard Choice more into the offense.
Barber is expected to get plenty of rest this week in the hopes of getting over his lingering thigh problem. The Cowboys (3-2) are also hopeful Felix Jones (knee) will emerge from the bye week healthy. But even if Barber and Jones are at 100 percent heading into the Oct. 25 home game against Atlanta, Dallas is determined to keep Choice in the mix.
"We've got to give him some touches," Cowboys coach Wade Phillips said. "We can't eliminate him. He makes plays."
When asked about getting more opportunities, Choice chose his words carefully. But he did suggest he would like to be more involved in the early going. "I feel I'm at my best when I do run it a lot," he said. "It helps you when you go into the fourth quarter and have already run the ball 15 times."
Throughout all the penalties, turnovers, and just downright sloppy play, the Cowboys are nine points away from a chance at a perfect record.
"I’d like to be 5-0, certainly," Phillips said. "But that’s not where we are. We played almost well enough to do that, and I told them one more play in two games, and we would be. But we’re not, so that’s reality. We’re 3-2, which is where we are, and we’ve got to do something about that. We’ve got to get better."

This offseason, the Cowboys made three key free agent acquisitions - one for each level of defense. Todd Archer says Keith Brooking, Igor Olshansky, and Gerald Sensabaugh are all fitting in well.
Brooking is second on the team in tackles to Bradie James with 55. He has a sack, two tackles for loss, three pressures and three pass deflections. He's also become this team's heart beat in many ways.
Olshansky might not be as heralded because 3-4 defensive ends don't put up great numbers but his 24 stops are second-most among linemen next to Jay Ratliff. He also has a sack and four pressures.
Sensabaugh has 26 tackles and a pass deflection so far. I think his better days are ahead and you're not seeing tight ends do as much damage vs. the Cowboys than they had in the past.

The NFL trade deadline is October 20th. Jason La Confora discusses some of the names that may be available.
The Cowboys will practice today and tomorrow, and then the players will have a three-day weekend.
0 recs |
167 comments
|
Comments
First to congratulate Miles.
Keep it up.
"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell
by GunsUp on Oct 14, 2009 11:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
First to call Allen "Awesome Rossum" Hpe he lives up to that name.
by mdlusk on Oct 14, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice!
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 14, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Vote: Head & Shoulders Player of the Week
Another place to vote for Austin as Player of the Week
by scottmaui on Oct 14, 2009 12:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Kudos to Miles Austin. I’ve always like the guy and was getting a little inpatient for him to seize an opportunity. He took a major step on Sunday.
Kudos also to the Cowboys for the Brookings and Olshansky signings. Those 2 have been outstanding.
by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 14, 2009 12:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely love the Rossum signing
We now have a guy that can take any return to the house, we haven’t had this type of return guy since Neon Deion.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 12:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Unless you count Newman and Felix
Of course players made out of glass aren’t quite as useful
by WAREwolf94 on Oct 14, 2009 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really meant punt returner
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I also like that signing for another reason
Patrick Crayton needs to be sent a message. He’s a solid receiver but almost single handedly cost the Cowboys the game last week. The refs blew the first call when he fumbled deep in KC territory. That probably would have been at least 3 more points for them. Then he fumbled the punt and set them up for one of their scores. Both plays to me were pure lack of mental focus. I like the guy (wish he would keep his big mouth shut more) but he was a perfect example last week of what has been holding the Cowboys back. Mental weakness
by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 14, 2009 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
He lacks superior athletic ability, so he better rarely make a mistake. He has made mistakes at crucial moments in his career, but doesn’t have enough upside to justify him continuing to touch the football.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
by Wmillion on Oct 14, 2009 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crayton
Is a great player for us i believe. Our offensive coordinator is not using him correctly. Put him in as a slot reciever, and he is one of the best if not the best. He can be relied an heavily, and will come through consistently. It’s what he does best. But put him out there as a number 2 reciever…..I don’t know. Whoever is responsible for that type of decision (and not going after a good deep threat reciever like Austin is only now becoming) in last years draft (not only this past draft) is where the real problem at reciever is. Austin having success (with his speed) will help Roy and Patrick and the other recievers alot. Without Felix out there, our team speed on offense ends after Miles. We need speed at the WR position. I hate saying it, but maybe getting Matt Jones too during the bye week may not be so bad after all. I don’t know. All I can say is we need rec ievers with speed.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 14, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Having Crayton in the slot, working the middle could really help open things back up for the TEs.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 14, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
His natural position is the slot
by cow_fanatic on Oct 14, 2009 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Don’t know why Austin wasn’t starting in the first place to stretch the field. Just the threat of him going deep will open things up underneath for Roy, Crayton, Witten/Marty B, and the RBs. I think Garcon has been doing that for Petyon and the Colts the last few weeks. Peyton has never had a speed guy like him to stretch the field.
by selke99 on Oct 14, 2009 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah..I thought back in training camp Crayton was going to be the #3 guy for sure....
Maybe Wade finally woke up…well see.
by Boyzfan94 on Oct 14, 2009 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Matt Jones
I would really like to see us sign him.
by cowboy1966 on Oct 14, 2009 6:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not happening with MJones
1)he doesnt know the offence and well be a non factor for few weeks and
2)who do you want of the roster? one thing for sure they’ll keep all the OL, so we have to cut a WR and I think even Ogletree right now is better than Jones
by dcfanz on Oct 14, 2009 7:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
MJones 65 catches for 761 yards last year.
He was better last year than anyone on our squad except Witten. I don’t know why no one has picked him up. Is he still smoking dope?
by cowboy1966 on Oct 14, 2009 7:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
has be something
With all of the teams that need WR, there is something. I don’t think he is any better then Sam Hurd. If Hurd got the targets, he would have better stats.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
by Wmillion on Oct 14, 2009 11:29 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
he's one bad night away from
screwing whatever team picks him up
Ich bin ein Berliner--JFK
by HudBaby on Oct 15, 2009 12:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our roster is getting thinner...
We were thin to start the season now were thinner. If our starters go down in some spots we’re in deep dodo. More starters playing Special Teams means more risk. Five rosters spots is alot to give up when most teams get by with three. These type of moves could come back to bite us.
by DIRE WOLF on Oct 14, 2009 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
ST is just as important as defense and offense, it comprises a third of the game. Anything that strengthens any one unit significantly is a good thing.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd bet Rossum can be as good a CB as Cletis Gordon, if not better.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 14, 2009 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We won't.
Jenkins and Scandrick are made of brick.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 14, 2009 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL!
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 14, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Terry
That’s a Parcells comment. Love it!
by cow_fanatic on Oct 14, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know too much about this Rossum dude
But if he was “ALL THAT” why is he even available to the Cowboys at this point? Wouldn’t some other team have him locked into a contract already?
Just a legitimate question.
by BishopWest on Oct 14, 2009 10:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The move does not cost dallas any money, his contract for this year is guranteed by the niners because dallas
has picked him up after the season started. So dallas can give him a look and if he does not have anything left in the tank he can be cut and dallas will not owe him any money. The guy signed a vet minimum contract; it is has a good chance at working out with little risk; if anything it will hopefully give crayton a kick in the butt to not feel too comfortable.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Oct 15, 2009 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But my question still goes unanswered....
….if Rossum was such a great “return man” why didn’t SF keep him on their roster? I mean, if he was like “Grade A” he wouldn’t be available to the Cowboys, right?
by BishopWest on Oct 15, 2009 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never said he was Grade A, but my point is the guy is probably as good if not better than crayton,
if anything it tells these guys that the coaches are going to take advantage of a situation where an available vet can come in and take some of your duties away if you do not perform. So to me it is a good move, they cut a cb to make room for another cb that will be the ST return man; it does not dimish depth because they did an apples for apples swap at the cb position.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Oct 15, 2009 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I totally agree that it was a good move
…I’m just a little taken back that so many bloggers are treating Rossum like he is the answer to all of our “return” issues. I’m suggesting that if he was THAT good, he wouldn’t be available.
by BishopWest on Oct 15, 2009 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's way better than Crayton, thats all I need to know
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 16, 2009 8:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well it has been a sore spot for a while that the media and fans have wanted address with an actual
return guy, and it is kind of like a person who is has been living on bread & water (aka Crayton) then when that guy gets a choice to something better it is just the best thing in the world. Rossum fits the bill and most everyone here was tied of Capt fair catch and wanted a guy who has more speed and return experience.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Oct 16, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's not great, but he may be better than what we have...he's coming in on the cheap...nothings guaranteed...
we broom his butt if he doesn’t produce. Rossum wasn’t cut because he did anything bad, but to make room on the roster for Crabtree. I hear several teams tried to pick him up on the East and West Coast. I trust JoeD…he’s done a pretty good job, so far…
by CaliFanInTx on Oct 15, 2009 5:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
there were a lot of teams interested in Rossum after he was released
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 16, 2009 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want to applaud JG
I like his playing calling this year. Top offense in the league, I think there are few things he can tweak, but overall he is doing a great job.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
by Wmillion on Oct 14, 2009 1:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree, we have been really balanced this year
and it’s hard to criticize when you’re ranked first in total offense.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree, re3spectfully but strongly
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 14, 2009 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
third
So far, Garrett’s play caling has not wowed me, and on more than a few occasions, it has puzzled me. I think it is more that the Cowboys’ skill players are all good to great, and that makes the offense go.
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
by Seanrude on Oct 14, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Me too. I've been a strong JG supporter...but he's made more than few "head scratching" decisions this year...
by CaliFanInTx on Oct 14, 2009 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jason Has Sucked
Repeat fades inside the five; the last two calls to the endzone in Denver. Dallas has run well considering injuries but overall it is hard to give Jason more than a D. The WR corp has not developed; where is Martellus Bennett or Jason for that matter?
by Iowacowboy on Oct 14, 2009 8:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
I have questioned some calls just like everyone else. But it is going to be hard to move up from 1st!
by cowboy1966 on Oct 14, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1..JG has been pretty bad.....really bad.....
Maybe people need to pay attention a little more….The Denver game alone going with the same play call against one of the best CBs in the league should say enough….JG is God awful and too predictable…
by Boyzfan94 on Oct 14, 2009 6:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
then we must definitely have the most talented
offensive players in the league to be ranked number 1 despite a horrible OC.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 7:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's bad dude...
Anyone that’s knows anything about football says he isn’t doing a good job…JG calling running plays and letting Felix Jones make plays with his feet and Austin getting YAC isn’t saying to much…JG has been medicore at best with his play calling…hey, maybe it’s Romo with his execution and not JG??? what you think about that Terry…..nah..right?…lol
by Boyzfan94 on Oct 14, 2009 7:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoever kept Choice off the field a lot the last game didn’t have very good judgement. Barber is a one legged RB right now. Choice looked very good.
by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 14, 2009 7:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
with all the tendencies that JG has
I still like him better than whoever was our OC from 97 to 05
by dcfanz on Oct 14, 2009 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree and Garrett is still my pick to be next HC
by AustonianAggie on Oct 14, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it's hard to understand and believe
That it’s possible a team has great talent, but because of decisionmaking, doesn’t live up to that greatness, and is really kept from becoming what we think it is, but yet still puts up great stats. The problem is, stats don’t win football games. decisions, emotions, the will to win, perseverance, heart, desire, and hard work as well as luck will take you there though, even if you don’t have the talent of your opponent. We’ve seen it many times in the history of the NFL.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 14, 2009 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even though it was against the chiefs,
by WAREwolf94 on Oct 14, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still saw some of this:
emotions, the will to win, perseverance, heart, desire,
apologies for the double post
by WAREwolf94 on Oct 14, 2009 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
really I just wish the players would keep their heads in the game
emotions cloud the Cowboys judgement… emotions have yet to impart super human strength to them. They want to win, they desire it.
But their attention seems lacking on plays here and there. If anything I blame too many emotions
by AustonianAggie on Oct 14, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you can't play football without emotion
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, technically, as a human
unless you Asperger’s Syndrome, you can’t do anything with out emotions. Even logical deductions only re-enforce and validate emotions, or diminish them.
by AustonianAggie on Oct 14, 2009 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
anyone who has played football, knows what I mean
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed there Terry..no question about that...
by Boyzfan94 on Oct 14, 2009 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you were a football player...
what should be your worse fear? losing. What if you lost- what would your emotions be like? You should be angry. But you should channel it to better your level of play, and not accept losing.
I’m sorry, but I don’t feel like Garrett’s playcalling instill confidence. He pushes aside conventional wisdom in favor of trying to attack a team down the field. Sorry, Charlie, but that doesn’t work all the time, and especially when defenses know it’s your achilles heal, along with the fact that your O-line is marginal at best in pass blocking. You’ve got to do better than that. By not being willing to change what your doing, you are showing no emotion as to what is happening to the team. That undermines your confidence as a player. This team is way more talented than the need to do that, and those decisions are killing us, but we’ll never know. We’ll just sit here as analysts and say either Garrett did a good job or didn’t.
Sooner or later, ownership will react. They have no choice but to see what a teams faults are.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 16, 2009 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
1) Garrett’s “play calling” that had Romo throwing to Austin last game instills confidence.
2) Attacking down field is conventional wisdom (nearly every team in the NFL does it), however in a recent game, the Cowboys first “down field” play was their 54th offensive play of the game with only 10 minutes remaining in the game. Prior to that play, everything was either a run or short pass.
3) This year the Cowboys are running more and passing less. That should please you, because I think that’s what you’re looking for.
by BishopWest on Oct 16, 2009 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No one is saying not to attack
down the field. If you are doing that too much though, are you turning the ball over alot too? If you are, and continue to do so, what does that say about your downfield attack? And say the turnovers are excessive, wouldn’t you start to question the validity of such wisdom?
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 16, 2009 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My responses to all 3 Bishop
1. It’s the Chiefs, not the Giants, so don’t get too confident.
2. Maybe they aren’t forcing it like they did earlier in the year, But those interceptions by the Giants are still burning in my head, as well as the one in the Denver game.
3. It’s not the Cowboys are running more that is the issue, it’s that they are calling passes at the wrong time. Please let’s not go into run-pass ratios again
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 16, 2009 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
attacking downfield is the way you win in todays game
all the good teams do it, even the so called running teams like the Giants and Falcons.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 16, 2009 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Especially
When that downfield attack produces interceptions for your opponent- That makes it real easy to win!
Win What?
I’m sorry for being sarcastic Terry. I just have a difference of opinion with you (I already know of my difference of opinion with Bishopwest).
I, for one, do not have a blind adoration for our passing schemes, even after Miles’s game. Something is not right there, and not you, or anyone on this board, has been able to convince me otherwise. There are alot of times I ask myself questions of why we passed the ball on a specific play. But why should I question it? It’s become normal now, hasn’t it? We’ve watched the same thing, what, now, for 3 years? Why should I expect things to develop and the team to get better AT EVERYTHING? Sorry for having that expectation Sir.
By golly, that’s what I need to think like- More passing by Romo, that’s the answer. That’s what it is- Garrett is not calling enough 5 and 7 step drops! Romo has all the time in the world to survey the field! Things will be fine! Romo’s just in a slump since…well, he first became QB.
I hope you can understand my disappointment in this offensive coordinator.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 16, 2009 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interceptions downfield?
Game 1 – TB – Romo threw zero interceptions
Game 2 – NYG – Romo threw 3 interceptions
Pass short right intended for Crayton
Pass short left intended for Witten (hit his foot)
Pass DEEP right intended for Hurd; picked by Phillips
- Note that this one pass to Hurd is the ONLY interception all year that Romo threw going DEEP downfield with those 5 to 7 step drops that you are so worried about.
Game 3 – CAR – Romo threw zero interceptions
Game 4 – DEN – Romo threw 1 interception
Pass short right intended for Austin
Game 5 – KC – Romo threw zero interceptions
So far this year Romo has thrown 4 interceptions out of 165 passes and ONLY ONE of them was picked deep downfield.
THAT’S RIGHT – ONE INTERCEPTION on a DEEP pass out of 165 total passes.
Sir, you are making much ado about nothing. You are all bent out of shape over Romo throwing INTs way downfield and it has only happened 0.006 percent of the times he has thrown a pass this year.
You’ve based your whole theory on something so minuscule that I can hardly believe that we even have to debate it. You’re making a mountain out of a mole hill.
The thing that you are so afraid of and worried over (interceptions downfield coming out of a 5 to 7 drop by Romo) has only happened once all year, and Romo plainly stated afterwards that he didn’t account for the safety on that play.
Pick something else to worry over – cause this is a non-issue.
by BishopWest on Oct 16, 2009 11:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't "define" it
NFL Game Center – play by play “defines” it. All I did was read it.
Here are the 4 INTs that Romo has thrown this year as listed by the NFL Game Center. And notice that ONLY ONE of them came on a long pass, the other three were on short passes.
(2:56) (Shotgun) 9-T.Romo pass short right intended for 84-P.Crayton INTERCEPTED by 25-B.Johnson at DAL 34. 25-B.Johnson for 34 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
(1:25) (Shotgun) 9-T.Romo pass incomplete short left to 82-J.Witten. The Replay Assistant challenged the incomplete pass ruling, and the play was REVERSED. (Shotgun) 9-T.Romo pass short left intended for 82-J.Witten INTERCEPTED by 21-K.Phillips at DAL 28. 21-K.Phillips to DAL 28 for no gain. Ball ruled down because of whistle.
(:36) 9-T.Romo pass deep right intended for 17-S.Hurd INTERCEPTED by 21-K.Phillips at NYG 5. 21-K.Phillips to NYG 27 for 22 yards (34-D.Anderson).
(12:45) (Shotgun) 9-T.Romo pass short right intended for 19-M.Austin INTERCEPTED by 24-C.Bailey at DEN 3. 24-C.Bailey ran ob at DEN 6 for 3 yards.
by BishopWest on Oct 17, 2009 1:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay then Bishop
My apologies- I shouldn’t have said downfield passes, I should have said downfield forced passes or just forced passes.
Whatever your reasoning for what you say, my reason for my opinion has to do with this kind of play has happened over time, not just the game you are quoting. this Offensive coordinator turns away from the run, during the most critical times of a game, and forces these passes against t teams. Don’t tell me not to make anything out of it, because I’m not, just stating my opinion. Just because you don’t like my opinion about it you seem to be going out of your way to disprove my belief. My belief is my belief, and I don’t care if you agree. The stats you keep on quoting seem to make your debate more meaningless with every game that passes and Garrett continues with his schemes. But don’t worry so much about my opinion- just watch Garrett yourself.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 17, 2009 7:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't get the wrong idea.
Our debates and opinions are somewhat fun, entertaining, and seem to be bringing out the best in both of us. We do feel differently about the OC and run versus pass issue, but look on the bright side…..we are both huge Dallas Cowboys fans, right? Right!
I’ve got much more in common with you and all other Dallas fans than I do with fans of any other team. Members in the same family will squabble sometimes, but when it matters most, we Cowboys fans are all a part of the same Brotherhood. (Give me a High Five…….)
by BishopWest on Oct 17, 2009 8:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not mad Bishop
I’m mad at loosing, and this is what I see, and It’s truly what I believe. Living here in NY and following the Giants the way I have, as well as being constantly surrounded by Giants Fans (friends and family) I can tell you only what i know about defeating them. If you ask me what’s best to beat the Eagles, I wouldn’t know as well, or Denver, etc. etc., But to beat the Giants…….
No turnovers. Just run the ball with Tashard, and watch them loose.
Is it coincidence that the Giants seem to know how to defense Garrett? No, just that he was a coach for them too, and they know his tendencies. Garrett is the only one that can change that perception of him, no one else.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 17, 2009 9:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So it's either short or deep, per them?
I would call a couple of those intermediate, personally, but they don’t have that option. If it has to be either short or deep, then there are going to be a lot that are short. They are calling anything under 15 yards short. I’m asking if that’s how YOU define it, too, as either short or long?
1st one – 10 yards, not short imo
2nd one – 4 yards, short
3rd one – 41 yards, deep
4th one – 14 yards, not short imo
by Baked Potato Soup on Oct 23, 2009 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yest WW94, but the reason
I don’t believe in this offensive coordinator anymore is because of his decisionmaking on offense. He will get his plays, don’t get me wrong. But until he proves to me against the real opponents, like the Giants, Steelers, Eagles, etc., that he has wised up and gotten his head together as to what his team is like, and come up with a varied gameplan that is tailored to each team we are playing, he will not gain back that confidence. The right decisions are not being made, and it’s clear to me that something is out of Sync with the Cowboys offense, and has been since he’s been here. It’s one thing when you struggle and overcome the Kansas City Chiefs. it’s another thing when you are facing the Defense of the Eagles, or Giants, etc.
good questions to mull over….
1. If this team’s offense is learning about itself on the fly, how can that be viewed as normal? Don’t you think the coaches have been here long enough to know the weaknesses, react, and have done something about it by now?
2. If this teams defense is evolving, and becoming better, how many games will it take to realize that maybe a puss rusher is needed? I’m beginning to wonder if Spencer can do it. Last week, Wade kept saying “Spencer is getting close, he’s getting close, he’s getting closer…..”
Well, it’s close but no cigar. I counted 2 missed interceptions and a penalty that prolonged a drive by Denver That Spencer was guilty of. That ain’t getting close, That’s getting far.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 14, 2009 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He did it.
We scored 31 pts on the Giants. He didn’t throw the 3 ints in that game.
You can watch any team and 2nd guess play calling. Maybe not Indy, but Peyton is OC on the field. People are questioning NE,saying they throw to much.
JG is getting it done and it isn’t by accident.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
by Wmillion on Oct 14, 2009 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He did what?
he allowed the Giants to be in the game by falling right into what they were looking for- turnovers. The Giants excel at points off of turnovers. The turnovers in that game came from forced passes, and are double-weighted. The Giants would not even be in the game if they didn’t see the turnovers. Garrett, apparantly, hasn’t figured that out yet. He’ll have to learn that by accident it seems, since when he watches them occur, he just keeps putting Romo out there to gunsling. You don’t bring a pea-shooter to a brawl.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 16, 2009 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
horrible analogy
Romo is big time gunslinger and you know it.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 16, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and obviously
my hope that Garrett would curb Romo’s enthusiasm from slinging it out there was just that- a hope. Garrett not only fails at curbing the Gunslinging – He encourages it!
If Garrett wanted to run an offense the way he is trying, there are a number of things to point out:
1. Why have you built an offensive line that is good at run blocking, but not good at pass blocking, Yet continue to put Romo at risk?
2. Why, after T.O.’s departure, did you not make it a priority to go after a deep threat reciever in the draft or in FA?
3. Why did you draft Martellus Bennett? So he can block? Some fan’s out here wanted a reciever with that 2nd rd. pick.
4. Why was there no reaction to Max Unger falling in the draft? Didn’t you feel a need to infuse youth and talent into this OL?
These are but a few questions I have regarding the handling of the offense.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 16, 2009 9:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure that's a typo, but thought I'd ask anyway...
maybe a puss rusher is needed?
What exactly is a PUSS rusher?
LOL
by BishopWest on Oct 14, 2009 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe he for got to add a "y" at the end?
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Oct 15, 2009 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is a typo
but maybe that’s what we have rather than pass rushers. opposing quarterbacks have to get the feeling tthat they don’t have time, and the job isn’t being done there. There are many of the other type of rushers. I’m one of them.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 16, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoa - you're gonna stick out like a sore thumb on this blog for
anything you say good about Garrett.
(By the way – I agree with you)
by BishopWest on Oct 14, 2009 10:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brooking and Rossum
While with the Falcons, Keith Brooking and Allen Rossum were each named the team’s Man of the Year (’06 & ’05, repsectively). In Dallas, Jason Witten is often associated with this honor.
Adding yet another high-character veteran at a position of need could go a long way for this team both on and off the field. Other than Brooking, Rossum’s familiarity with Coach Wade and Coach Joe D is a connection that has proven to be an asset for this team.
Making this move even better is the fact that the Cowboys next take on the Falcons. Coming off a bye week, with key players and coaches who have been familiar with Atlanta could help Dallas get to 4-2.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 14, 2009 1:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Aaron
I wanted to get your thoughts on Flo?
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
by Wmillion on Oct 14, 2009 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Personally, I'm down on the guy so it may not be the best week...lol.
When I watched him at training camp, he looked slow. I had never been to training camp before, so maybe that’s just how he is—being an ol’ veteran and all.
I’m 50/50 on the guy. Like some of the other bloggers, I agree that it’s too much of a risk to put Free in there full-time. Flo may get penalties and fines and miss a block here and there, but he’s still playing on an aggressive level. IMO, he does not look like he lacks any confidence in his abilities—tripping fouls or not.
On the other hand, I wouldn’t mind seeing Free get in for a series or two. The way this team is playing, there won’t be many blowout games where they can get Free some real experience. Should something happen to Flo, we gotta go with Free anyways, so why not let him build a little chemistry with the first group?
Grant it, subbing in an O-lineman is nothing like subbing in a nose guard. In practice, they were subbing in guys who jumped offsides or committed false starts, but during games everybody just sighs and rolls their eyes. Honestly, I don’t see Flo being the next Jackie Slater and playing until he’s Favreish—I see him hitting his point of diminishing returns.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 14, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Totally right on the money
About Flozell. He’s still got something left though. Just has to cut down his mistakes, or else you gotta take him out and put Free in just to show him this won’t be tolerated. Why didn.t the Cowboys go after a Tackle the last 2 years in the draft? There must be a reason. Probably because of Davis being able to play the position? I don’t know……
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 14, 2009 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
they had higher priorites
and plus by the time they picked, there really wasn’t many good ones available.
I hardly ever agree with Deke, but I will agree with him on one thing…if Bigg ever has to play LT, we’re in serious trouble and Romo is a dead man walking.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly my thoughts on using Bigg there
They should have moved up in the second round to draft Unger, Then gotten a tackle with the 3rd. No reason to let Seattle trade in and pick him right before our pick in the 2nd rd. we needed to re-stock our O-line, especially since the Giants keep re-stocking they’re D-line (sometimes with our players too).
We haven’t done a very good job there. Brewster could turn out. But that doesn’t help us now.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 14, 2009 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Forgot about Brewster.
He should be eligible to get off PUP by Week 7. Wonder what they’ll do with him.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 14, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
True.
Unless they make every Cowboys fan in the world happy and let Procter go.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 14, 2009 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They'll probably cut an Olineman and make room
if he’s got anything to offer. He must have more upside at this point than a player like Proctor or McQuinstan
by AustonianAggie on Oct 14, 2009 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah we're so strong in OL...
if someone goes down we’re f—-ed
by DIRE WOLF on Oct 14, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder if they would try Marty B at LT
if Flo went down and Free couldn’t do it
by AustonianAggie on Oct 14, 2009 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Considering how much of a
student of the game he is and how serious he acts, he probably knows all the plays and calls already
by WAREwolf94 on Oct 14, 2009 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Romo would get killed...
LT is hard to play that why they make the big bucks
by DIRE WOLF on Oct 14, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good, I twas thinking you should know better
by DIRE WOLF on Oct 14, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha
On a side note, I’m facebook friends with MartyB – he’s an addict.
I’m also friends with Tashard Choice, Marion Barber (but I don’t think its his real account) and I’ve sent a request to Mike Jenkins. Also Clarence Hill and Calvin Watkins for good measure. I want to see how many I can friend and then I’m hoping at some point that one of them notices I’m friends with all of them and says “who the *@$& is that??”
by WAREwolf94 on Oct 14, 2009 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rayfield Wright
and that new Eagles LT, both TEs entering the league
by AustonianAggie on Oct 14, 2009 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hate to tell you but Jerry Jones brought it up
back in the summer. he said, if Marty B weren’t such a weapon down field, we’d move him to LT
by AustonianAggie on Oct 14, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes that sounds like what our GM would say
by DIRE WOLF on Oct 14, 2009 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Raf pointed out that NE's success
largely dealt with interchangable parts. I’m down with some of that Kool Aide. I know its asking a lot, but remember Magic Johnson’s 1st NBA title, when he lined up Center, because Kareem Abdul Jabaar was hurt?
I know a lot goes into blocking schemes but Marty is a great blocker, and lines up shoulder to shoulder with Flozel often
by AustonianAggie on Oct 14, 2009 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he plays LT we better sign ...
more back up QBs we will need them.
by DIRE WOLF on Oct 14, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree they missed out on Unger
but sometimes teams burn you in the draft like Seattle did us, Jerry rolled the dice the kid would be there and he lost.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I do think its possible that Jerry wanted to move up, but couldn't get a dance partner
I agree if he just sat there, then there was a miscalculation on the part of him and the brain trust
by mdlusk on Oct 14, 2009 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How do you not let someone trade in and pick before us?
by staubachfan on Oct 14, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unger is now starting RG
I really wanted him at center for us. But this shows you how good he was.
by cowboy1966 on Oct 14, 2009 7:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not what I meant
What I meant was in reference to DallasPalace’s comment “…No reason to let Seattle trade in and pick him right before our pick in the 2nd rd.”
You just can’t just stop someone from making a trade or moving up in he draft.
by staubachfan on Oct 14, 2009 7:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, but
If you are the Dallas Cowboys, going into the draft, no first round pick, don’t you make a contingency plan, and look to try and trade up to get a player that would fall out of the first round, and make it a point to find a trading partner, especially after seeing players drop? This did not seem the case Staubachfan. They just seemed to stay aloof and not react, and when they did not get what they wanted (the player didn’t make it to our pick), like a baby, just started crying (meaning they traded out of the first round). They needed to target an oiffensive lineman in this past draft. I would have never thought Unger would have fell so far, but stranger things have happened in the draft.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 22, 2009 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correction
traded out of the second round is what i meant
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 22, 2009 10:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm hoping they have their eye on a few guys coming out this year.
There’s a few good ones right there in the Dallas area.
http://www.mockingthedraft.com/pages/2010-nfl-draft-offensive-tackles
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 14, 2009 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks for the info.
I feel the same way. I really want to see what we have in Free, because Flo doesn’t appear to have much left.
Free feet the fire might work out!?!?
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
by Wmillion on Oct 14, 2009 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm thinking after about 1/2 a game with Free
you’d be looking to put Flo right back in there again
by BishopWest on Oct 14, 2009 11:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
FLo
Gets beat and continues to lead the league in penalties..
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
by Wmillion on Oct 14, 2009 11:36 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Flo does get a whole lot of penalties
but I still trust his experience lots more than Free’s inexperience. I’m thinking that Free would end up with less penalties, but get burned for sacks in BUNCHES. Playing Free may get Romo injured much quicker. I rather have Romo and Flo playing than Free and Kitna.
by BishopWest on Oct 15, 2009 12:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If they roll Romo out it won't matter.
Get some quick hitters over the middle. There are ways to make up for Free’s inexperience, but this staff won’t do anything that is different.
"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell
by GunsUp on Oct 15, 2009 7:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would only want "different" if it was actually better
…and swapping Flo for Free isn’t better. So in this case, I don’t want “different”
by BishopWest on Oct 15, 2009 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
tough to know.
There have been some young LT’s that have stepped in played well out the gate. Baltimore has done it twice with Gaither and Oher.
Free played well in the pre-season.
I don’t have the answer, but I know you just can’t say Free isn’t ready.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
by Wmillion on Oct 15, 2009 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Flo shuts down many of the best Pass Rushers in the league
often too.
by AustonianAggie on Oct 15, 2009 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just like he shut down Hali?
How about Dumerville the week before?
Did he shut down Tuck? Tuck shut himself down.
For the penalties and stupid mistakes he makes this “Shutdown” argument is no longer valid.
"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell
by GunsUp on Oct 15, 2009 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Flo is no longer a "shutdown" LT
but he is WAAAAAAAAY better than his replacement.
by BishopWest on Oct 15, 2009 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can only imagine how fired up Brookings will be for the Falcons game
I don’t think he’ll allow us to lose that game.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brooking will play all posistions.
and we’ll win 99-0.
by Rickyy. on Oct 14, 2009 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Makes me kinda wish Atlanta was one of our road games.
I am eager to see the Stadium again after two weeks away, though.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 14, 2009 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not me!
I’m flying into Dallas next Thursday for the game. I plan on bringing back a BIG FAT WIN.
by Road Warrior on Oct 14, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well welcome to Texas then.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
by Uncle Angus on Oct 14, 2009 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have a good feeling about the Atlanta game.
But Atlanta just kicked the crap out of a pretty good SF team.
by cowboy1966 on Oct 14, 2009 7:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
believe it or not
we’re capable of beating good teams despite what all the naysayers are proclaiming.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Capable, it just hasn't happened in a while
by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 14, 2009 7:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we've only played 2 so far
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 7:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And lost 3 out of the last 4 last year. That makes 5 losses in 6 games to decent teams.
by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 14, 2009 7:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
last year was last year
different year, different team
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 7:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to me
Same undisciplined play, too many penalties, mostly the same players and coaches.
by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 14, 2009 7:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the dynamics of every team changes every year
sometimes its subtle, sometimes its not, but the 2009 cowboys are not the 2009 cowboys
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 14, 2009 7:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The 2009 Cowboys are the 2009 COwboys
They are different from the 200 8 Cowboys, but you aren’t saying that there is no carryover, are you?
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
by Seanrude on Oct 14, 2009 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, I meant the 2008 Cowboys
What I’m saying is that the dynamics and make up of the 2009 Cowboys is different from last’s years team, so you can’t say just because they did XYZ last year, that means they will do XYZ this year.
Doesn’t necessarily work that way.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 16, 2009 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
true but there is a history there, a lot of the same players, and it is not unreasonable to see trends
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
by Seanrude on Oct 16, 2009 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand trends.....but
who can explain the Titans fall this year when they have many of the same players as last year. Even subtle changes can cause a team to greatly improve or deteriorate. Trends don’t necessarily predict the future.
Although I’m hoping that DAL does break out of some of their recent “trends.”
by BishopWest on Oct 16, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trends do not necessarily predict the future, but they are a useful tool for attempting to do so
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
by Seanrude on Oct 16, 2009 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't disagree with that....
….I’m saying that just because something was a certain way before, doesn’t mean it’s going to be the same way again.
One example I gave above is TEN Titans.
Another example: D Ware. Last year he lead the NFL in sacks and this year he had zero sacks through the 1st four games.
Another example: What trend would have predicted that Austin would break the all-time record for pass receiving yards in a single game in Cowboys’ history? None. That’s beyond trends.
My point is that many, many things happen on the football field, both negative and positive, that totally defy previous trends. Now, I understand that you don’t throw out all trends or team tendencies as though they are meaningless. They can be helpful.
In game 1, Romo throws the heck out of the ball (over 350 yards) and we get three long TDs off of big pass plays.
So in game 2, the Giants look at that “trend” and decide to stop the pass versus Dallas, and they limit Romo to 127 yards passing. However, we ran the ball over 250 yards against them. I guess the “trend” changed from week one to week two.
You just can’t put very much faith in trends in my opinion.
Now, without doubt the Cowboys have been one of the most penalized teams for several years in a row. That seems to be a very predictable trend that hasn’t been reversed yet. But it can be. It’s not set in stone. It can change just as quickly as Austin breaking an all time record or the Titans falling to 0-5.
by BishopWest on Oct 17, 2009 2:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a great point. Ties in with some posters desire for emtion, too.
Brookings is of great character apparently and plays with emotional intensity. Sounds like Rossum can add much to this important area of the game that’s let us down some.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
by Uncle Angus on Oct 14, 2009 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wade clearly doesn't get it
Played almost well enough to be 5-0??? That’s laughable. esp. after needing a miracle to beat possibly the worst team in the league. Clearly this team needs to be kicked in the butt, instead more coddling. It’s becoming more and more clear that coach cupcake is leading this team to disaster.
by just4fun on Oct 14, 2009 9:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Should we trade TNew + for Nnamdi Asomugha?
I say yes.
by Cosby Sweater on Oct 14, 2009 10:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
What?
Where did that come from? Pull the trigger on that one before Al wakes up and takes his medicine.
by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 14, 2009 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see brookings "practice hard" speech fell on deaf ears
this team doesn’t practice hard enough.
by just4fun on Oct 14, 2009 10:52 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It will have good results on the players who have his character, but unfortunately he may be out numbered.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Oct 15, 2009 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















