Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jon Jones, Rashad Evans Reignite Rivalry

Trade Crayton?

What do you guys think? Crayton is really not that valuable to the team and he does have some what of a name so we could get a decent CB for depth or a LB or even a Safety. This would absolutely clear the way for the young WR like Austin, Hurd, and Ogletree who all look to have some good upside. I would not mind this move. I know it seems like one bad game out of Crayton and I am throwing him under the bus, but I just think its a good time to get some value in return. his contract is not that hard to move.. plus it creates a chance for the youngbloods to get some well earned playing time. I dont know about you guys but I want to see what Ogletree and Hurd can do with playing time. They both had amazing camps, what else do they have to do in order to see the field for more then 2 snaps. This move would help jumpstart the team for the future and get them some good experience. Its not like we have to give up that much on field production in order to do so. If you actually look at it, I think we are guaranteed the same amount of production with the possiblilty of ssssoooooo much more with the youngbloods playing. So in the end there is nothing to lose and so much to gain


Poll
Should the Cowboys look to trade Patrick Crayton?
Yes
135 votes
No
107 votes

242 votes | Poll has closed

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

Comment 73 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I just don't get all this

talk about Crayton. I hate him as a punt returner because all he normally does is waive his hand in the air (and him trying to make a play that he shouldn’t is probably the reason for his fumbles this year on PRs). But the guy has been incredibly reliable and makes the play that needs to be made 99% of the time. Maybe I am watching a different game than everyone else, but this whole movement that Crayton is a bum and should be cut/traded/benched seems ludicrous to me.

Patrick Crayton is as reliable as receivers come, and it seems to me that he has worked very hard in the off season to become faster and it has showed. 84 is a good WR and should remain a staple of this offense. I don’t mind him losing time to Austin if the coaching staff thinks that is best, but he has to be in the line-up on critical passing downs and all third downs.

by sduncan24 on Oct 15, 2009 9:58 PM CDT reply actions  

+1

The Knights season may have just ended, but the Cowboys year is just begining!

by aussie_cowboy on Oct 15, 2009 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

Crayton is more valuable to the team than most fans realize. He runs good routes, has normally great hands, and blocks really well.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 16, 2009 8:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

He's a good solid starter

Good teams are built around having a group of good solid starters. Why would you trade a guy like that? He’s also the only proven WR on the team who has proven he can stay healthy. The only value of this post is that it’s somewhat provocative.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 19, 2009 7:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

i agree

he needs to be used the way he plays though… he’s solid when hes a slot receiver, getting those first downs, much like witten… him and witten need to be dominating the middle of the field

by CowboysFan4Life on Oct 16, 2009 9:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yep

he’s solid. Not great, but solid. We’d miss him.

by SB2008 on Oct 16, 2009 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

not so sure..

Amani Toomer? Marvin Harrison?

Team’s move on.. I just don’t picture myself saying, “Man I miss Patrick Crayton” or “Patrick Crayton would have made the play”..

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Oct 16, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Oct 16, 2009 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Value

What do you think you could get for Crayton? I think Crayton has some value to this team, not point in trading him. I think he just needs to play a different position.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Oct 15, 2009 10:17 PM CDT reply actions  

he does have value

I am not saying he is a bad player and he NEEDS to go. I just think we could get something for him. But he is consistent

by bloodsweatandtears on Oct 15, 2009 10:20 PM CDT reply actions  

P Cray

Would you want Dallas to trade for a player like Crayton? I know I wouldn’t.. Crayton=DJ Hackett.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Oct 15, 2009 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thoughts

Romo became the starting qb in 2006 (actually midway through that season)

But for the sake of simplicity and to save myself hours of research, let me just list the receptions and yards of our 5 current WRs since the beginning of 2006. My idea is to estimate how many passes these guys may have received from Romo. (Again, I’m not doing the research on which games Romo was injured and didn’t play – I am just looking for a ball park figure, not the exact number.)

In the regular season games since 2006:

Arrived in 2009 – Ogletree – 0
Arrived in 2008 – Williams – 30 rec, 412 yards, 2 TDs
Arrived in 2006 – Hurd – 29 rec, 468 yards, 1 TD
Arrived in 2006 – Austin 33 rec, 685 yards, 6 TDs
Counting from 2006 – Crayton – 140 rec, 2006 yards, 16 TDs

*although Crayton arrived in 2004 I’m excluding stats for 2004 and 2005 because Romo wasn’t the one throwing to him.

My point is that Romo and Crayton have successfully connected on pass receptions 4 times more than any other WR on this current roster. To trade Crayton would limit Romo to throwing to WRs who have thus far only caught an estimated total of 92 passes from him. Patrick has caught more passes from Romo than all of the other 4 WRs put together. We don’t need to lose that kind of chemistry right now.

(Again, remember that these are estimated totals but I think that the point still remains that Romo and Crayton have a connection that might not be there yet with some of the other receivers.)

by BishopWest on Oct 15, 2009 10:59 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

+1

Chemistry is a biggie, and Crayton’s a good slot receiver

by Joon on Oct 16, 2009 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I get the argument

but, the Colts let Marvin Harrison walk and he is the teams All-Time leader in almost every stat category.. I think Indy is doing ok without Marvin.

I may be the minority, but I think Hurd could do more with similar looks.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Oct 16, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great point...and I agree...

Look what they are doing without Anthony Gonzalez also…they plug in a rookie WR in Piere Garcon and dont miss a beat…This strenghens my point also we need a young speed guy in the slot…whether that be Ogletree or a rookie next year we have to get some speed in the slot.

As far as Hurd he can do the same as Crayton given he has good hands and a little faster….

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 16, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

respectfully disagree

marvin was in the decline, he wouldn’t be producing like he had his whole career… and he started to have baggage

by CowboysFan4Life on Oct 16, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

But I thought that Indy had some guy named Reggie Wayne on their team, no?

Who is our Reggie Wayne?

That’s just it – we don’t have one.

If Wayne wasn’t on their team at that point, Marvin probably stays another year or two.

by BishopWest on Oct 16, 2009 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1

Indy comparison doesn’t work. Wayne is a top WR in the league, and Harrison’s departure was due to health/cost consideration, neither of which applies to Crayton.

3-2 headed for the bye week.

by APerfectStar on Oct 16, 2009 8:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

It works

Teams move on.. NYG moved on from Plax and Toomer, both better plays then Crayton. They are getting it done with a bunch of unproven WRs, why not us? We have the best TE in the game, he should see the ball more..

Point is Crayton is expendable.. I think he has value, but he isn’t special, dependable, but not special. We wouldn’t miss him.

Crayton isn’t the holding this offense together.. Like I said, if you gave Hurd the same looks we would get more production.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Oct 16, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not arguing that he's indispensable

Both Indy and NYG have drafted WR’s in early rounds the past couple years. That is different than Dallas’ approach. Dallas is not real deep at WR. Partly because of emphasis on TE and RB positions.

I’d say Terry Glenn’s exit when TO was still our #1 WR is more like the situation in Indy with Harrison and Wayne. That situation worked out well because Crayton had a great season for a #2 that year.

3-2 headed for the bye week.

by APerfectStar on Oct 17, 2009 1:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hear ya..

Both Philly and NY have made some solid selections at the WR position in recent years. I just knew were taking a WR when they drafted Martellus..

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Oct 17, 2009 5:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

I am not saying Crayton is worthless

but I would rather see Hurd get the ball.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Oct 16, 2009 10:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm fine with Crayton or Hurd, I'd like either of them in the slot

Hurd still has possible upside, while Crayton has already proven himself, but might be on a downward track.

3-2 headed for the bye week.

by APerfectStar on Oct 17, 2009 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

While I’m not a fan of Crayton we can’t trade him, unless the Cowboys are working out a trade for another WR. I agree that Crayton shouldn’t be returning punts and he should be the number 3 WR but he is consistent. He usually gets 3-5 catches a game and seems to have a good relationship with Romo. We need to be giving Romo more weapons not taking them away.
Interesting note Adam Schefter was on ESPN today talking about 5 trades that should happen, and he mentioned Dwayne Bowe getting traded. He said that a 2nd and a 5th would get him. I would give that up for him. That would allow us to go after a LT in next years draft, instead of having to also add a WR.

by jack dein on Oct 16, 2009 12:10 AM CDT reply actions  

Whoa

I like that deal, 3rd year receiver, had 900+ his first year, 1k last year, w/ a QB that has time to throw he can put up more yards, but I said the same about Roy, lol

"We play to win the game" - Herm Edwards

by nicholas.rodriguez on Oct 16, 2009 3:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Crayton may be slow, relatively speaking

but he is a playmaker. Career YPC average over 14, long gainers every year, including an 80 and 44 yarder so far in 2009. Decent 3rd down conversion rate. Keep him as slot receiver.

Crayton is going to end up being the second-best ever undrafted free agent wide receiver this team has ever had.

by DavidH22 on Oct 18, 2009 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

really....thats not saying much...lol

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 18, 2009 6:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Value

I think he’s more valuable to Dallas than he would be to another team for the reasons BishopWest stated above. I don’t think Dallas would recoup the loss of a reliable WR/backup PR. Unless some GM has a higher opinion of him, Dallas would come out of the trade weaker.

3-2 headed for the bye week.

by APerfectStar on Oct 16, 2009 12:12 AM CDT reply actions  

I agree

Might have overvalued what he could bring. There’s no way he’d bring a decent CB or safety.

by illcowboy on Oct 16, 2009 1:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Value is the key

The only players that could be traded now in order to get value that would substantively improve the team for this year (i.e. the addition would be significantly greater than the loss) would be Barber or Choice. A trade offer of Barber for someone like Shawne Merriman would have to be considered, short of that it’s wasted effort.

Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam

by LRogue on Oct 16, 2009 7:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Crayton should probably stick around

Guy’s a good slot receiver. He’s not fast, but he’s slick.

But I was disappointed in him in the last game. Guy fumbled twice, technically. The first was a lucky break on our part. Both are pretty much inexcusable when he’s supposed to be our most consistent receiver who catches everything. He doesn’t have much big play ability to make up for his shortcomings.

He should absolutely lose his starting position. Miles offers way more. But unless we could get good value out of a trade, I’d keep him around, at least until Ogletree develops into a guy we can depend on(that fumble on the KO return told me he isn’t quite ready to play on offense just yet).

Epic Fail since 1985

by the red scare on Oct 16, 2009 4:35 AM CDT reply actions  

Here is the deal...

Jerry paid Crayton like a #2 WR 2-years ago, so nobody is going to trade anything for him. His experience with Romo makes his far too valuable for us to just trade him mid-seaon for a 6th round draft pick or special teams 3rd team LB.

I like Crayton. Not as a kick-returner (ok – maybe a “fair-catcher”), or an outside WR, but in the slot. He is a good route runner and has above average hands.

I think Roy and Austin should start on the outside and Crayton should be our “slot machine”.

Cowboy Up!

by CowboyCrazy on Oct 16, 2009 7:17 AM CDT reply actions  

Craytons contract is a non-factor in him being traded if he was..it is cheap...

What other football minds outside this blog are thinking of crayton..

The National Football Post’s Michael Lombardi says Cowboys WR Patrick Crayton has “gone down faster than any player I’ve seen in a very long time.”

“He has no juice left in his legs, appears to have lost his quickness and doesn’t show any skills that make him tough to cover,” added Lombardi. Crayton’s obvious decline is just another reason that Miles Austin will hold onto the starting flanker job opposite Roy Williams.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=2909

Crayton signed a 14 mil contract in 2007 with a 6 mil signing bonus. Crayton will get $1.5 million in 2009. He receives a base salary of $2 million in 2010 and $2.5 million in 2011. In the final year of his contract, he can earn an additional $1 million if he reaches certain incentives.

He salary is cheap to unload

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 16, 2009 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

I haven't seen any decline in Crayton

People on here were saying he looked quicker in the PS. I have no idea what Lombardi is talking about.

by StillHateTheGiants on Oct 19, 2009 8:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with CowboyCrazy

That we should keep Crayton as a slot receiver. Howver I also can see us going after Bowe. I would actually be willing to try to trade Roy Williams in any deal for Bowe. I just really like Bowe alot better than Williams. My issue with RW, is unlike a Braylon Edwards or a Plaxico Burress, RW is weak when he goes up…I’d go so far as to say he goes up with “alligator arms”.

by jtgreet02 on Oct 16, 2009 8:03 AM CDT reply actions  

Crayton has little to no trade value, but I agree a move in the offseason or sooner should be made....

Crayton brings very little to this offense and nothing now on special teams with the Rossum signing. A better poll should be trading Newman who has some value left…..

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 16, 2009 10:53 AM CDT reply actions  

What could they get for Crayton?

Maybe (MAYBE) a 5th rounder…and while a trade for Bowe sounds intriguing, who would be benched forhim? Austin? Dude just had a huge game. Give him a chance to produce on a regular basis. Williams? He cost alot a acquire, he ain’t gonna ride the pine.

by DavidH22 on Oct 16, 2009 12:04 PM CDT reply actions  

I don't think we SHOULD trade him, but if we did

Maybe trade a 2nd, 3rd, and Crayton for Bowe and their 4th. That basically puts Crayton’s value as a late 5th rounder since (hopefully) their pick would be much earlier in the round than ours.

Never interrupt your enemy when he's making a mistake. - Napoleon

by MadDawg03 on Oct 17, 2009 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

probably a 6th or 7th rounder....

thats all….he wont be traded, but I would like to see him demoted to the 3rd and maybe the 4th at some point during the season. I think Ogletree or Hurd can bring more to the table than Crayton as this point….they will probably try to trade Crayton in the off season or cut him next year….I just dont see them keeping him when there are better players waiting behind him.

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 16, 2009 12:56 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah

Crayton is mediocre at best and I agree that the young guys are looking stronger these days, but we wouldn’t get jack for Crayton. I see a previous comment speculates a 6th or 7th rounder and that sounds about right. But despite Crayton’s lackluster skills, he is probably more valuable than a late round draft pick (at least if you consider our last few late round draft picks). We seem to have more luck with undrafted free agents anyway.

Maybe Parcells would want him down in Miami.

by Taoboy on Oct 16, 2009 1:50 PM CDT reply actions  

Maybe losing two jobs in one week

will make him realize how close to the edge he is and he’ll play like it.

by Billito on Oct 16, 2009 3:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Crayton has been a bum for years now

Sorry, but he hasn’t been good since he was taken out of the slot. He runs his mouth too much and produces far too little.

Maybe we can trade him and a pick for Josh Cribbs? Wishful thinking…

by ChrisRichey on Oct 16, 2009 3:33 PM CDT reply actions  

While I would love to get Cribbs on this team..

I doubt Cleveland would consider taking aboard Crayton, which I’m sure they (as well as the rest of the league) see as an aging possession receiver with some left in the tank, but not enough to consider giving up a young, play-making receiver/returner. Any trade for Cribbs would include strictly draft picks.

by Thehomerpimpson on Oct 16, 2009 8:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know.......

where all this talk of trading Crayton is coming from. The guy has one bad week and now it’s, “trade him right now.” The guy has good hands and while he may not have blazing speed, he is a reliable player in the passing game. He muffs a punt, so we sign Allen Rossum. It was good timing for Crabtree signing and getting Rossum the week after Crayton not doing good on punt returns. But……. he is our number 3 WR whether we like it or not….. Hurd has NOT leapfrogged over him, YET. Ogletree did have a great training camp and preseason, but not until next year will he get extensive playing time, IMO. We’ll see if Miles Austin can continue his great play before we start saying get rid of Crayton.

by Felix J on Oct 16, 2009 3:52 PM CDT reply actions  

+1

it’s yet another overreaction. Crayton’s not going to make it to a Pro Bowl anytime soon, but he’s still solid. He is what he is, a slot guy. Hurd isn’t ready, neither is Ogletree. Put RW on one side, Austin on the other, and Crayton in the slot … and try that out. I bet it works.

by Dub_TC on Oct 16, 2009 5:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1

All this Crayton is a Bum stuff is getting old. crayton is a productive #3. Miles austin has one good game and Ogletree fumbles in his only game action thus far….and everybody is ready to trade Crayton?
Remember how big Crayton came up when Terry Glenn went down?
Lets give austin a little bit longer to prove he’s going to be a consistant threat and not just a “Chief killer”….LOL….
Give austin the starting spot….put crayton in the slot…..to be honest, thus far Crayton has been more productive than Roy williams….LOL….yeah,Lets cut him…HaHaHa…what a bum!!!!

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Oct 16, 2009 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think he is a bum

but if you ranked our WR’s on play-making ability he would be 4th in my book..

1 Austin
2 Williams
3 Hurd
4 CRAYTON

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Oct 16, 2009 10:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hurd id better than crayton????

HaHaHa…….
when Hurd….williams….and austin ARE HEALTHY…..they asre still not much better….with the possible exception of AUSTIN.

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Oct 18, 2009 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

He said playmaking

and I am not trying to put words in his mouth, but I believe he is talking about making big or explosive plays and in that category I think it is pretty conceivable to rank Crayton last. I still like Crayton because of the consistent first down he is going to give you, but that is just me.

by sduncan24 on Oct 18, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

exactly..

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Oct 18, 2009 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

not over-reaction

this has been a topic of discussion on here for at least a year.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Oct 16, 2009 10:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Crayton has been pretty much a non-factor for a couple of years....

Why this man crush for a medicore player is beyond me….He shows up for one or two games a year and that’s all….some here have already pointed out teams like NY, Indy going with younger less experienced players and it has worked out for them tremendously. It’s time to get players like Ogletree, Hurd, Austin more involved and demote a player like Crayton that isn’t doing a whole lot expect run his mouth..

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 17, 2009 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

NY's young receivers

were all big-time college players and high draft picks. We all know Crayton’s pedigree. He’s done quite a bit for the team’s original investment.

by DavidH22 on Oct 18, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah.

That’s great and all. Get back what you invest. Jackass Jerry never invests anything legit in drafting a receiver except a couple of 4th-round projects (well, there was that one guy who insulted the Big Blowhard) so what the Cowboys end up with is 3 receivers (and actually a 4 on a LOT of teams) posing as a starter.

by MadMick on Oct 18, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

exactly...Sklyer green and Stanback..two draft pick blunders....

Hopefully Jerry learn his lesson he can’t skimp on WR talent and draft a top notch WR next year.

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 18, 2009 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm okay either way

I think we can take the hit at WR and rely on Hurd for the #3…its a downgrade but not a large downgrade. The key would be what we get for Crayton if he were to be traded. If it created an upgrade greater than the downgrade at WR it would be worth considering. If there were a good NT that could backup Ratliff it might be worth it. If its a CB, it would be tougher to justify because the player we get is unlikely to be better than Scandrick so we’d take a hit on a player who plays 10+ plays a game (3rd WR) for an upgrade at the 4th CB who plays very seldomly. The positions that might make sense to upgrade would be NT, Safety, OLB and OL.
Keep in mind that its often not 1 for 1 in trades when they occur. If a trade were to occur the Cowboys might be adding a player from the bottom of the roster or picking up a 2nd player that creates the need to cut a player from the bottom.

by Kansas Cowboy on Oct 16, 2009 6:46 PM CDT reply actions  

my concern with trading crayton

is Austin and Hurd and RW’s inability to stay healthy. Crayton is rarely hurt. Honestly, if we trade Crayton, i think we end up starting multiple games with Hurd or Austin an Ogletree at wr.

But otherwise…I think we are all remembering 2006 and 2007 crayton. Look at his play the past 12+ games. Look at the numbers – hes hardly bringing anything to the table. I have a hard time believing hurd, austin or ogletree can’t peform as well as he has been. The guy hasn’t been consistently effective since early 2008 (which happens to be the time TO’s play fell off…and Romo’s to some extent).

by foyesboys on Oct 16, 2009 11:49 PM CDT reply actions  

Hurd/Austin and ogletree at wr...

and hurrendous game day depth behind them.

by foyesboys on Oct 16, 2009 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

If depth was a concern...

We could pick up a player like Matt Jones and he would be more productive….why a 6’5 player that runs a 4.3, 4.4 40 that led his team last year is still on the street is weird….If used the right way he would be more productive than Crayton. How could anyone argue that…

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 17, 2009 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

There has to be a story there

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Oct 17, 2009 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Obviously quite would argue that

maybe its the drug problems, but theres gotta be a reason for him being on the street

by foyesboys on Oct 18, 2009 3:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not a fan of Crayton

but with out a doubt he is the most reliable receiver we have. when was the last time you saw him injured? He’s not the fastest, strongest, or biggest wide receiver we have, but he is always there, which what we need.

by Alexcomestokill on Oct 17, 2009 1:52 AM CDT reply actions  

Maybe my Ravens will jump on this oppurtunity....

How about a 2nd round draft pick and Troy Smith for Crayton, This seems fair enough to me.

R.I.P. Tony Fein
May God watch over you wherever you are now and may you be in a better place. We will never forget you!

by Zachary Beard on Oct 18, 2009 8:57 AM CDT reply actions  

You badly undersell reliability.

I’ll just get this out of the way; once upon a time and in a key game (the Cowboys needed to beat the Cards to gain home-field throughout) Kevin Williams had 9 grabs for 203 yards. After that…hell, he probably didn’t have 203 receiving yards the rest of his career.

Point is: Miles Austin had one huge game where he twice shook off the same corner (for long TD’s) who most likely sucks himself. Austin has been a virtual no-show besides that. Should Austin at some point easily supplant Crayton as the other starting wide-out? Sure; if only Potential The Kid could ever prove he was a consistent performer. The fact is though that in 4 other games this season, Austin has a paltry 5 catches for 81 yards.

Sure, this team should have better than Crayton but at least he’s reliable. As for Ogletree: A.) who knows how good he really is and B.) we all saw last weekend that dumb smart guy Garrett thought a banged-up Barber deserved double the touches a fully able and even more capable Tashard Choice deserved. In other words, fat chance of this freckle-faced fraud taking a chance on giving a rook receiver significant playing time.

by MadMick on Oct 18, 2009 11:23 AM CDT reply actions  

Pro's and Con's

Pro

His exit gets Ogletree on the field sooner

The speed on the edge increases

More balls for Bennett and Felix

Con

Romo doesn’t have good chemistry with Roy or Telly B, which then increases the likelihood of INT’s coming from people running the wrong routes

Experience is critical in late season road games…are you sure you want a rook or Bennett on the field in those matchups?

He brings little value in trade

Any injuries then make the WR corps scary thin

"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Oct 18, 2009 11:36 AM CDT reply actions  

basically

He isn’t worth trading.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Oct 18, 2009 6:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thats experience and great hands sure was a factor on the drop slant play right last year..lol

C’mon people….we wouldn’t be missing anything without Crayton…He hasn’t done anything this season to say we need him in the lineup..nothing…oh yeah..he did have one good game, but he is good game a season..big deal..

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 18, 2009 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Disagree

Don’t let one play change your opinion of a player. It took me tons of miscues before I even began to sour on Romo.

"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Oct 18, 2009 7:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

This team has 4 undrafted free agents at WR

IMHO that’s an embarrassment.

Crayton should and would be a 4th or 5th WR on most teams.

He’s Hank Baskett without the former playboy girlfriend.

Matter of fact our entire WR core behind Roy Williams are a bunch of Hank Baskett’s.

by Sharksbreath on Oct 18, 2009 5:00 PM CDT reply actions  

I think thats going to change next draft....hopefully Jerry wakes up and uses a first round pick on one

Dez Bryant anyone?….he will get reienstated……keep an eye on this guy for a NT…Terrance Cody DT from Alabama….he is a monster at 6’5 370 lbs….

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 18, 2009 6:40 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

222724_1014143404454_1551120017_30067740_5911_n_small
Jason Garrett: From Process to Promise
Rush_hour_small
Is Doug Free Overpaid?
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Hindsight Games Part 1: J.J. Watt
Rush_hour_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario

Recent FanPosts

Small
Could Terence Newman have been playing injured?
Cowboysmetal_small
NFL Player Salary Problem Solved.
Small
Offseason Priorities
Small
Starters, dominant players, and BPA
Dez_bryant_small
What we need is for Jerrah to act like a GM and be proactive and fix the team with $17M under the cap resources
Small
It's Rabble's Fault
Small
Do what Philly did in 2011, only better

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui