FISH on FOOTBALL: A Top-10 X's And O's, Cowboys And Falcons Style
Getting you ready for Cowboys-Falcons ... with a FISH on FOOTBALL Top-10:
1. It's not always just about acquiring good players. Sometimes it's about how you acquire them.
It's too early for the Cowboys to give up on the acquisition of pass-catcher Roy Williams. He's been highly unproductive, but the UT product's pedigree is inarguable. No, the debate is whether the best way to acquire a big-bodied veteran pass-catcher is to spend a first-, a third- and a sixth-round pick for one.
That debate hits the field on Sunday and is embodied not only by the presence of Roy (who says it's time to "call 911'' ... the jersey numbers of Romo and Roy) but also by the presence of another big-bodied veteran pass-catcher.
To acquire Tony Gonzalez to play tight end for them, the Falcons sacrificed a second-round pick.
Roy Williams for a first, a third and a sixth.
Or ...
Tony Gonzalez for a second.
Good players. Both acquired. But the difference is the "how.''

2. Speaking of great tight ends: In Jason Witten's last 15 games, he has three TDs. The Cowboys need to find other blockers to protect against the blitz, tell other pass-catchers to shut their mouths and open their hands, and simplify some throws for Tony Romo.
Jason Witten should score three TDs over the course of a full-season's games almost by accident. Dallas might want to try getting him the ball in the red zone on purpose.
3. In one interview Jerry Jones says the game against Atlanta "is going to be an all-day sucker.''
In another interview Jerry is talking about the Roy trade and says maybe it wasn't "the greatest trade since ice cream.''
Methinks Jerry has a sweet tooth.
4. As the guys at ESPN wrote it, Patrick Crayton "just wishes somebody would have told him about his demotion.'' ... Crayton feels he was "in the dark about the change'' ... and Crayton "just feels that, as a six-year veteran, he deserves an explanation.''
Nope. No you don't. One thing about football: Nobody deserves anything. Your explanation, Patrick, came when you showed up to practice this week and took fewer reps. That's your explanation.
5. Atlanta is doing something wrong to open games: In five opening-game possessions, the Falcons have produced one short scoreless drive, a pair of three-and-outs and two FGs.
Meanwhile. ...
6. Dallas is doing something right to open games: In five first quarters, the Cowboys have given up just 10 total points.
This could be a case of a moveable object meeting an irresistible force.
7. Falcons-at-Cowboys brings Fox' A-minus team to Arlington. We get Troy Aikman, but the play-by-play guy will be Thom Brennaman because usual partner Joe Buck will be off doing baseball.
Joe Buck will not be missed.
8. Here we go again with the anointing oil.
Matt Ryan, Michael Turner and Roddy White are not Aikman, Emmitt and Irvin. They are not similar in playing styles and - while they have promise as the foundation of the Atlanta offense - they are not even on the same planet in terms of accomplishments. The Falcons are 4-1 and the Falcons have the potential to be better. But this offense, as near-glitzy as it is, doesn't consistently top 300 yards per game, is getting just 3.5 yards per carry from Turner and is about to get tested (theoretically) with four roadies in its next five, at Dallas, at New Orleans, home vs. Washington, at Carolina and at the Giants.
Gonzalez has been terrific and Atlanta's O-line hasn't allowed a sack since Week 1. Those two issues have been as instrumental in the Falcons' success as any of the "next-Triplet'' guys.
Maybe Ryan/Turner/White really is on that track. And maybe on Sunday the Cowboys get to play them before they reach that pinnacle.
9. Here's a weird one about the Atlanta defense: The Falcons aren't special in stopping the run. They rank 23rd. The Falcons aren't special in stopping the pass. They rank 21st.
Yet they only surrender 15 points per game. You win a lot of games if you give up 15 points per game.
So what gives? Atlanta has 12 takeaways in five games. Only two NFL teams have more. The Falcons have five interceptions (that's a middle-of-the-pack number) but they have seven fumble recoveries. Eight leads the league.
All of this is proof of how blemishes can be covered up with play-making. And all of this should be a lesson to the Dallas defense, which has the fewest takeaways (two picks, two fumble recoveries) in the NFL.
10. Yesterday I wrote that I cannot figure out Jerry's motivation in announcing him NOT executing a trade.
"We had a significant offer for a key player that we turned down, and turned down in getting in more extended dialogue for," Jones said after Wednesday's NFL trade deadline. "So we did have that kind of activity ... but I shouldn't name the player or the team. It was a very firm, significant offer for one of our young players that we had a chance for a lot of consideration if we had wanted to take it, and we didn't."
Because Jerry was so willing to talk that much ... you just knew that he (or somebody) would talk a little more. And now we all assume it was Martellus Bennett.
And now maybe we have Jerry's motivation for hinting at all of this: He gets to go to Marty B and tell him, "See how much we love you? Cincy wanted you bad, but we love you even more!''
So maybe you get a more focused Marty B.
Or maybe you get a more cocky Marty B.
Said Bennett today at Valley Ranch: "I get more press than anybody I know who doesn't catch any balls.''
67 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yes, but Roy and Gonzo are not equal players
The #1 difference, and the #1 reason that Roy warranted more compensation, is the age of the two players. For a third round draft pick, for instance, I have commonly heard it said that you are supposed to get at least a 3-4 year starter. Gonzalez is a supremely talented pass-catcher, but he’s got another 2-3 years of productivity in him, by my estimate. Roy has much much more career ahead of him. Sure, Roy hasn’t been productive so far, and whether or not he ever justifies that compensation is a separate issue.
I’m not faulting the Falcons, I think they made a good move to help their team now and help their young franchise QB, but I don’t think you can compare his trade and Roy’s trade apples to apples.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
if anything
the gonzalez trade would make what we gave up for roy make more sense – except obviously roy isnt producing right now.
A pro bowl but declining TE for 2-3 years for a second round pick or a guy who we thought would be a solid #1 receiver for the next 5-6 or so for a 1st and 3rd….
that is a good point
but Gonzalez has a track record of excellence. Williams historic production is much iffier.
by I_miss_Switzer on Oct 23, 2009 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions
Haha...sorry to edge you there Staubach
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
I'm so glad Joe Buck will not be announcing our game
I really don’t like him. I just feel like he gets very excited when things do not go well for the Cowboys.
I agree 100%
I think Buck loves to see the Cowboys lose. He’s a dip sh#@!!!
by thruthicknthin on Oct 22, 2009 8:27 PM CDT up reply actions
Roy trade - we also got a 7th
I would just note that I believe we also got a high end 7th round pick from Detroit, which was not too many spots from the low end 6th round we gave up, so those essentially cancel each other out, and in reality it was “just” a 1st and a 3rd.
+1
People ALWAYS FORGET THAT. It was basically Roy for a 1st and a 3rd.
by northtexan95 on Oct 22, 2009 8:00 PM CDT up reply actions
which is still a high price to pay for someone who has yet to produce in Dallas, and did not seem to do all that much in Detroit
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Fish
An interesting stat concerning the Falcons, those 7 fumble recoveries. It’s generally accepted among advanced-stat geeks like myself that fumble recovery rates are generally random, and they do not seem to be reproducible year-to-year. It would seem that Atlanta’s defense has mostly been the beneficiary of some good luck. It definitely takes skill to force a fumble, though. They lead the league there with 11.
'Luck'
"I’m a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work, the more I have of it." – Thomas Jefferson
by One.Cool.Customer on Oct 23, 2009 3:07 AM CDT up reply actions
Except
when statistical analysis proves that if you are a hard worker your luck still changes.
by Doctorjorts on Oct 23, 2009 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions
I think the obsessive need to compare current players to greats
Is starting to get a little out of hand. For Ryan alone, I’ve heard the Aikman, I’ve heard the Peyton, I’ve heard the Favre, and on and on and on. What is Ryan? A very good young quarterback who does a good job of protecting the football. What is Turner? A guy who had one very good season and hasn’t done much of anything in 2009. What is White? One of the best darn receivers in the NFL over the last three seasons, which were immediately preceded by two very lackluster ones.
And that’s it. If I hear one more national pundit try to draw that kind of comparison, I’m going to want to strangle him/her with his/her own shiny purple tie.
No offense at all to you, Fish, as I found the post interesting. I just hear this stuff everywhere I go.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
Come on Dave, give me a break..
Human nature makes people compare likenesses between players. Some of them add a gallon of hope when they do it and come up with a name, oh well. The impressive thing about Ryan is he’s in his second year and apparently isn’t suffering any sophomore slump. I think Turner is a little worn down from going from back up to LT to starting back. The question with him is, can he get his legs back? It’s not helping that Norwood keeps getting dinged up in that regard. And White I think has always been a bona-fide stud..it’s just that his growth was stunted by that runnin…er, quarterback that used to play in Atlanta.
and sometimes people compare qualities
without saying they are on the same level as that person. For example, a lot of people are comparing Choice to Emmitt, not because he is anywhere close to the same level at this point in his career, but because he has a similar running style. In the same way, there are parallels between how Ryan and Peyton Manning play as QBs. Ryan is nowhere near his level yet, but there are similarities in their styles. I agree we can go overboard with it sometimes, but it is human nature to look for those comparisons.
White put up a stud season with CHRIS REDMAN at quarterback!!
That always astonishes me. That’s like what Calvin Johnson did last year in Detroit. Truly impressive.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
I'm just always sketched out
I want to see the comparison earned over several seasons. It’s the crazy person in me, I guess.
But you’re right, it’s human nature. Just a bit of an overreaction on my part.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
by Dave Choate on Oct 22, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions
I was just Van Halen'ing you
I agree with your sentiments..the comparisons do get out of hand with little/no proof.. I will say this though..You guys have finally got a real QB and I think with a few pieces you might be sniffing another SB appearance in the future. And don’t underestimate the power of Dimitroff either. Might be the best acquisition to date.
I tend to agree with you
there seems to be this idea that you have to lock in your judgment of a player RIGHT NOW. No waiting for more data points, no looking for the perspective that you might have in a few years. NOW!! It’s pretty silly, really.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
You protest too much Dave
Ryan, Turner and White are talented players. Whether they even gain elite status only time will tell. They have done well and their ability should not be underestimated. I look forward to seeing how the Cowboy defense deals with them.
They used to compare Manning, Harrison, and James
to the triplets, put the longer time goes on, that’s not paying Peyton Manning enough respect for his QBing.
Anytime a team has a good WR, RB, and QB...
…the triplets get brought up. It’s a compliment in a way, but the comparisons usually don’t go down to the level of detail of the actual individual style of the players. Michael Irvin’s playing style wasn’t much like Roddy White’s or Marvin Harrison’s, for example. And Emmitt was very different than Edge. It’s just an easy reference to make when you’ve got a trio of playmakers on a team.
I wonder why the Cowboys’ triplets are the most often referenced as the standard bearers? I guess it was the 3 championships. You’ve got plenty of other Hall of Fame triplets out there— Jim Kelly, Thurman Thomas, Andre Reed….Joe Montana, Jerry Rice, Roger Craig….Quincy Carter, Troy Hambrick, Ken-Yon Rambo…the list goes on…
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
lol
yes, I read to the last line!
I see it as a compliment, although NFL people have a love/hate relationship w/the Triplets (a nickname I’ve always hated, BTW, sounds wussy) due to anti-Cowboys bias.
Everyone has to admit they were all 3 great, HofFamers-But, supposedly, none of them were really that good, since they had the benefit of each other and that “great offensive line.”
Yet no one ever says the same thing about the 49ers or Steelers players, for instance.
by Realist Larry on Oct 22, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Wuss nickname
Yep, in the case of Troy, MIke & Emmitt, I think “The Trinity” would have been more suitable.
Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.
The difference is
the Cowboys’ “Triplets” had a brand name. “Triplets” It was coined for them, so therefore when comments are made on any other threesome, the comparison is necessarily made.
Anyone who makes the comparison without breaking down substantive comparative variables is lazy and unimaginative.
D$%#$ IT NOW I HAVE TO CLEAN LUNCH OFF MY SCREEN.
"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell
You have to give Edgerrin James his props.
He was a monster out of the gate winning back-to-back rushing titles his first two seasons. Neither of their current backs is as good as he was in his prime.
Harrison’s greatness is trickier to define, of course, because we all saw how scary good an older Randy Moss was in ‘07 after being thought of as “done” after finally playing with a great QB. So there will be the natural tendency to ask what kind of scary numbers Moss (or T.O. for that matter) would’ve put up if he’d played his whole career with Manning with most assuming those numbers would’ve dwarfed Harrison’s.
The Colts’ Triplets label was ultimately justified though; they were the best statistically at their respective positions for a number of seasons. They just couldn’t get it done in the postseason for a myriad of reasons: NO defense and having to go up to New England to play.
James pre-knee injury was an ELITE back
And even after the knee injury, he managed to be very productive (although Peyton Manning as a QB preventing 8 man fronts certainly helps), while also being an excellent receiver and pass blocker.
James’ career stats put him in the top 20 all-time backs, and I think that’s probably an appropriate place for him. He was hugely talented and productive in his prime.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
Post knee injury, Edge eventually managed to put together back-to-back 1,500 yard season in '04 and '05.
Great point.
But then he went to the Cardinals and carried the ball a whole lot when they were still just lame birds which has all but finished him since he ended up averaging 340 carries between ’04 and ’07; two of those seasons behind a bad Cardinals O-line.
Now as good as Edge was, the scary question to ask is what could a Colts offense have been like where they figured out how to utilize Faulk’s versatility (had they kept him) as effectively as the Rams did. That’s fully acknowledging how good of a receiving back Edge was himself, but Faulk who they in effect traded to get Edge was on another level.
Faulk was the NFL's best player in those Rams years
1999-2001, Faulk was supernaturally good. He should have won 3 straight MVPs, instead of 1 to Kurt Warner’s 2.
I think part of it was his supreme talent, but part of it was also Martz’s coaching, which helped him. Also, Marshall has said that it helped him a bit to be made to switch teams, because it made him realize some things and turned him into a less selfish, harder working player.
Truly a unique player, though, in those Rams years. What a weapon.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
Well it's not like TO ever played with bad quarterbacks - Young, Garcia, McNabb, Romo
But I’ve definitely wondered about the numbers Steve Smith would have put up with a not-Jake Delhomme.
That's true of T.O.
But you know there are plenty of pundits and other folks would still make that point when specifically comparing Harrison and T.O. And while none of those guys T.O. had throwing the ball to him were geeks off the street (well, actually Romo and Garcia sort of were when they got their big chance) his numbers would’ve seen some increase if he’d played with Peyton his whole career.
Good point about Steve Smith. Delhomme is every bit the gunslinger Romo is; only he’s got the coveted postseason skins on his wall.
That's not fair
if Romo got to play the Dallas Cowboys in the playoffs (Delhomme’s first postseason victory), he’d of had his first playoff win a long time ago.
What can you do though? That's the perception.
Also would you be willing to go as far as to state Romo won’t earn his first playoff victory until it ACTUALLY is against the Cowboys? Wouldn’t that be something? Romo could even be a Panther by then; in a year or two. If something like that did occur, I bet Jerry would literally peel off his face to reveal his true ghoulish visage.
Delhomme had a heck of run in the ‘04 playoffs. His gunslinging ways are what put the Panthers ahead late in the Super Bowl. However up and down he’s been the rest of his career he certainly played well enough to deserve a ring in those playoffs.
I tell you one thing
the triplets were great—but just how great were they after Novacek and Haley left after 95 (or did Haley make a few games in 96). Never underestimate the importance of the near-greats.
We were just talking about Haley the other day
when you watch the SB replays, you are reminded what a great player he was. He simply could not be stopped by the Bills.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
Kind of Tired
Of talking about the Roy trade. I stil think it is to early to determine. Do I wish he came in like Moss for the Pats? Sure, but that isn’t realistic, so I will just wait and see. I like what he adds to this team.
I agree with Fish we need to use Witten more in the red zone. It is weird, but I agree Skip Bayless too, I think we tie game vs. Denver if Roy wasn’t hurt. If Roy is really healthy, I think Miles, Roy, and Witten are about to do some damage.. I would love to see Hurd gets some reps at the 3.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
Why Is It Unrealistic To Think We Would Not Have Signed Roy Without a Trade?
All signs pointed to Roy exiting Detroit. There was little chance Detroit would have signed him. Roy wanted to come to Dallas. Roy was in the last year of his contract so he held all the cards. Truth is the Jerry suffered from premature eruption in making this trade; last season the evidence was mounting that TO was losing his skills and the team was in trouble or not hitting on all cylinders . . . Jerry panicked and gave away the farm . . . can you say Joey? Consider the opporunity lost: can you say Percy Harvin and Rookie of the Year?
One thing about football: Nobody deserves anything. Your explanation, Patrick, came when you showed up to practice this week and took fewer reps. That’s your explanation.
I disagree slightly about this particular stance. I’m not sure Crayton used the right word in “deserve”, but having a coaching staff tell him upfront that his starting position will cede to Austin or whomever, why is that seen as a bad thing? If anything, a coaching staff that is honest with the player breeds a measure of respect. Crayton doesn’t have to like the coaching decision, and I would hope he doesn’t like being demoted. But as a fairly long-time contributor for the team, it does help with morale and team chemistry when the decision makers leave no ambiguity about their decisions.
There’s no hidden agenda here, so why try to hide it? Instead of tiptoeing around the situation, tell Crayton from the start he’s going to lose some playing time to other players. This isn’t about coddling the player, rather it’s about treating players as adults. You want to get back your playing time? Practice harder. Block better. Make tough catches and not fumble. But don’t make platitudes and dilly dally around the situation by gradually reducing someone’s playing time without an explanation.
A coaching staff is supposed to breed accountability, discipline, and respect. Crayton shouldn’t even had the opportunity to voice his concerns to the media. He should have been told beforehand, understood why that decision was made, and do something about it in practice/game. Situation dealt with and confronted. Treat players like adults, they perform their jobs like adults. Anyone who doesn’t feel like following that model doesn’t have to be a member of the Dallas Cowboys.
Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell
Just to clarify though, I’m not against the Crayton “benching” at all. The Cowboys have to play the best players on their roster, so if Crayton or whomever is replaced by another player because they’re better, so be it. I would be infuriated if the coaching staff didn’t put the best players on the field.
I’m merely disagreeing with the particular reasoning of not giving a player a direct explanation, even if it’s simply, “I’m reducing your playing time. Why? Check your game film against last week. Disagree? Show me in practice.”
Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell
Crayton was told he wasn't starting by the coaches
He just wasn’t told why and that was Fish’s point…he doesn’t need to be told why, it’s obvious.
Austin is a better playmaker, end of story.
In Romo we Trust
He feels he wasn't told why
I’ve had several experiences where I’ve had to talk to employees about either being let go or not being selected for a promotion and you can sit there and be brutally honest with all your reasons. However, more often then not they walk out of the office feeling like they were never given a “good” reason and therefor feel they weren’t told why they were let go or not promoted. I’m just saying that might be his perception but that may not be the reality of the situation.
That's what I take from it as well
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
"I get more press than anybody I know who doesn't catch any balls.''
Haha Marty B is always good for a one liner.
That says
more about the Dallas press corps than about Marty B.
Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.
Roy Could Have Been Had for No Draft Picks
What makes the Roy trade a disaster is that we could have had him for nothing. He was going to be a free agent and he did not want to sign with Detroit nor did Detroit want to sign him. Sure there is no guarantee he would have made it to the Cowboys but is was worth the risk. Had we taken this risk, then we could have likely had Percy Harvin. The fact that Roy is not producing or that he has devolved from an elite receiver to a glorified Keyshawn proves the price was way too high and we should have been patient and run the risk.
But with multiple teams seriously looking for a WR
NYG, Ravens, Titans, Iggles, Deadskins… Dallas didn’t want to risk missing out on what they considered the best available.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
#9 is the key element to this game
The Falcons are a good team because they create turnovers and take care of the ball, so the key to beating them is winning the turnover battle or at least not losing it.
Cowboys I think easily win this game if they do that.
In Romo we Trust
Crayton has been on the block ever since the NFC playoffs '07
When he ran his stupid mouth and then was the majority contributor to the Cowboys losing. Ugh seeing him drop that pass AND quitting on his route still sits in my head.
Patrick, you’re a loud-mouth with marginal ability. When you normally sure hands fail, you’re a sub-par receiver. Miles Austin has an infinitely higher ceiling and needs a chance to flourish. Shut up, play the slot, and take the receptions you get.
Greetings from the Humungus, the Ruler of the Wasteland, the Ayatollah of Rock and Roll-A. I laugh at your puny plans.
One thing to bear in mind with the Roy vs, draft a receiver with that 1st pick deal
The Cowboys don’t play rookies. All this talk about Harvin, and I like him a lot, I think he was the 2nd best receiver in the draft, but he just wouldn’t be on the field much for the Pokes. Maybe as a return man, but he wouldn’t get many passes.
I’m not arguing that we paid too much for Roy. I think it’s clear we did unless he begins to blow up soon. But Roy brings many valuable things to this team, and I still like his chances of scoring 7 or more TD’s this year, especially if Austin can sustain his play and the 3 headed monster is healthy.
Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"
That is why we need to get rid of the Candy A%^&ed coaches who can't bear to hurt someone'e feelings.
"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by 






















