Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

It's About Time the Cowboys Played This Well

I'd say it was sometime in the second quarter of the Cowboys and Falcons game when an idea occurred to me. I have no idea if the Cowboys actually worked on this during the bye week, but something was different for the Cowboys offense on Sunday. And it's one of the most basic elements of offensive football that we don't really discuss.

Tony Romo and the Cowboys offense were getting to the line of scrimmage with plenty of time left on the play-clock. They were as efficient as I've seen them in a long time in terms of getting plays and personnel into the game. I can't recall a play where we were frantically jumping around to get set trying to avoid a delay of game penalty. We didn't waste a bunch of time-outs because we couldn't get set, either.

Why is that so important?

Star-divide

Because it gives Romo time to observe the defense, wait to see if any blitzers tip their hands, and then call out protections to his line and check to audibles if needed. By some quirk of microphone technology (and a quiet Cowboys crowd), we got to hear some of that going on. We got to see Romo stand at the line and very carefully point out everything he wanted done in a calm, cool manner. No frantic shifting or screaming, and no running to his spot in the shotgun to get the snap at the last second. He spent his last second before the snap looking at the defense, instead of watching the play-clock and screaming at Andre Gurode to snap the ball. No distractions let him focus on the defense entirely.

And on Sunday the Cowboys were very good about picking up Atlanta's blitzes, something that has bedeviled the offensive line for a while. Sure, we all remember Romo's amazing escapes during the game, but there were only a few, most of the time Romo was getting great protection and the running backs were right on cue in picking up the free blitzers.

A couple of weeks ago, the Broncos got a free blitzer from the edge that sacked Romo and created a costly turnover.

It was at some point in the second quarter of this game, when I noticed a secondary player for the Falcons creeping up on the edge. This time, Romo looked at him, and turned to the tackle and then the running back and pointed him out. They ran the play and the Cowboys picked up the blitz without a hitch.

I can't say it was all because Dallas was efficient in calling their plays and substituting personnel, but I don't think it hurt, either.

0 recs  |  Comment 105 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

It certainly didn't start off good

but I am pleased by the way they responded to that poor start.

by grey9er on Oct 26, 2009 12:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

It all turned around

When Romo got his bell rung! He played lights out after that. It’s like it flipped a switch in him and it was old Romo all over again. (the good one)

Ich bin ein Berliner--JFK

by HudBaby on Oct 26, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe

he will be like Spiderman when bit by the radioactive spider. A superhero. This is some pretty good wine I am drinking!

by cowboy1966 on Oct 26, 2009 8:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No Kidding, Romo Looked Out for the Count

But came back as Superman; go figure.

by Iowacowboy on Oct 27, 2009 7:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I noticed that too.

The offense seems to have calmed down, guys know where they should line up, and now Romo can focus on his presnap reads.

Makes a huge difference.

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Oct 26, 2009 12:57 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yep

I also think he repositioned a RB to the other side of a formation.

I mentioned this topic earlier because the same thing hit me. I really think that this getting to the line with the call quickly to let them be ready has been what they have intended all along but this is the first week they looked like they were all able to execute it.

Great post, Grizz.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Oct 26, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And if they continue to do this, the false starts may be reduced as the OL get less jumpy.

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Oct 26, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point as well

Seems to really make a lot of sense.

I remember one of the picks in the Giants game where Romo ran out of time to adjust. This would help with that kind of stuff too.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Oct 26, 2009 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Keep this guy away from us!

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Oct 26, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+10001

The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.

by gee-roj on Oct 27, 2009 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

i don't need a weatherman to knows what way the wind blows.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 26, 2009 1:02 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Things looked way calmer yesterday

less pointing ad nauseum by everybody, less of Romo begging for Gurode to snap the ball.

by I_miss_Switzer on Oct 26, 2009 1:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Couldn't agree more, Grizz

That was one noticeable change in the offense. The first five weeks it was absolute pandemonium before the snap.

That had to have helped.

by Starred4Life on Oct 26, 2009 1:16 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The team played up to its potential

For about 70 to 80% of the snaps we played good football. That’s what we’ll need consistently from now on. I believe on the first 5 games we were playing 50 – 50 between stupid football and good solid football. That was enough to beat TB, KC and Carolina but enough for NYG and Denver…… we couldve easily won those two games. Damn they hurt.

by ManTab on Oct 26, 2009 1:20 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Take care of the little problems...

and there won’t be many big problems.

I don't need a weatherman to knows what way the wind blows.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 26, 2009 1:22 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

I saw a lot more discipline, and its good to see that Romo can really put up a great performance after getting hounded by the media. He is stronger mentally than most think. We got an easy one coming up this week that we can’t take to lightly, and then I get to see the Boys live in Philly!

by witten82 on Oct 26, 2009 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Doesn't it also seem logical

That Romo being able to get everyone set and survey the defense with plenty of time also helps him execute the play better? Not feeling rushed or uncertain?

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Oct 26, 2009 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

thats the most comfortable Romo looked in the pocket for quite some time

Actually, I would be hard pressed to remember the last game when he looked that comfortable, almost Brady like.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 26, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

a solid preparation will do that

I wish the coaches would prep like this for every game. And the baffling part is we should know our div. opponents like the back of your hand, but we looked terrible against the Giants

by dcfanz on Oct 26, 2009 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

First half of the Browns game last year?

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Oct 26, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love when we play the Packers.

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Oct 26, 2009 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It makes me miss

Erik Williams

Ich bin ein Berliner--JFK

by HudBaby on Oct 26, 2009 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah, him:

Eric Offensive Holding Williams, I remember him too!

Just becuz you put yer boots in the oven don't make it bread

by dcfansinceiwasababy on Oct 26, 2009 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not that one, Erik "hands to the face" Williams.

He was a beast and he kicked Reggie Whites ass. Very nasty(dirty)

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Oct 26, 2009 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and Bruce Smith's ass in two Super Bowls

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Oct 26, 2009 7:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like that big arm brace he had.

It was set to permanent clothesline.

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Oct 26, 2009 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Erik Was a Monster

Him and Larry Allen set the tone for that championship dynasty; he was a key figure at the Whitehouse, as well.

by Iowacowboy on Oct 27, 2009 7:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry for going OT, but I can't make a fanshot or post via mobile

Cowboys have a 4:30 press conference schedule. Maybe DeMarcus is going to get his money.

www.draysbay.com

by Tommy Rancel on Oct 26, 2009 1:45 PM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Or maybe they're giving to

Miles instead!!

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Oct 26, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I wonder how the Jets feel about Miles now!

by CowboyCurtis on Oct 26, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A little nauseous, I'm guessing...

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Oct 26, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he tunes out the media somewhat now...

If we see how stupid they are you know he can see it. The media uses the shock crap so much now. They take us for fools and we know they’re morans.

I don't need a weatherman to knows what way the wind blows.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 26, 2009 1:45 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

opps morons**

I don't need a weatherman to knows what way the wind blows.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 26, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They say Ware on the radio

I don't need a weatherman to knows what way the wind blows.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 26, 2009 1:49 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Thats about the market isn't it?

I wouldn’t trade him for any other DE or OSL out there

I don't need a weatherman to knows what way the wind blows.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 26, 2009 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Terrell Suggs got about 38 million guaranteed

So yea its near market price

www.draysbay.com

by Tommy Rancel on Oct 26, 2009 2:00 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

that'd make me very happy

reasonable price too. May actually be underpaying him.

by foyesboys on Oct 26, 2009 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Ware would take a little less to stay a Cowboy.

After all whats a few mil between friends.

I don't need a weatherman to knows what way the wind blows.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 26, 2009 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jerry will take of Miles in the off season

I don't need a weatherman to knows what way the wind blows.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 26, 2009 1:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

* care

I don't need a weatherman to knows what way the wind blows.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 26, 2009 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

YEAH

THEY SAID THEY ARE HAVING A PRESSER TO ANNOUNCE DWARES EXTENSION.

by TONYINCC on Oct 26, 2009 1:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yayyyy!

Pay him his f’ing money!

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Oct 26, 2009 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

At some point early in the game, I felt the confident 'old Romo' had returned. By that, I mean the Romo I had

complete confidence in, no matter the D&D. Yes, a couple were dropped, but Romo was on the money throughout the game.

Family, Friends, Cowboys, Beer & BBQ. Life is good!

by CowboyMan on Oct 26, 2009 1:56 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

it makes all the difference,

what a stark reality lets say compared to the Giants game

by dcfanz on Oct 26, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny you say that

There was a point when the game was still close but as the offense lined up, I just felt like they “had it” and were going to move down the field and take control of the game.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Oct 26, 2009 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed...

i think a lot of THAT feeling had to do with the fact that they were ‘ahead’ of the clock, every play…

they were in position, reading the D, calling audibles and all that pre-snap stuff without having to worry about the clock…

they looked the way REAL good teams do, NO panic, no hurry, just get the play, get to the line, make your reads, change the play if necessary, assign your blocks if necessary, and run the play….

probalby makes a TON of difference than running to the line and trying to audible and barely getting the play off, or making a mistake in the read because you did not have time to be thorough…

by stephena on Oct 26, 2009 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

great point...

i also noticed that we were at the line ready for the snap with 10 seconds or so to spare, look over the D, change the play, what ever needed to be done….

i mentioned a few weeks ago in an email to a friend, a list of things that i thought coaching was at fault for, and this was one of them…

in previous games it seemed that the O was ALWAYS rushed and that Romo had to snap the ball before he was really ready….

by stephena on Oct 26, 2009 1:58 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I only saw the game from about midway through the third quarter, but noticed the same thing

Was that true for the whole game?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Oct 26, 2009 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pretty much.

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Oct 26, 2009 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not sure..

i noticed it in the second quarter…

but it was so obvious… EVERY time they would show the play clock and where the O was, i expcected it to have like 4 seconds on it.. but every time it had like 10 or so….

and they had PLENTY of time to look things over and run the play…

by stephena on Oct 26, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

good to know, that can only help

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Oct 26, 2009 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha me too

I was thinking that the guy who decides when to show the playclock on fox’s telecast had gotten lazy or something, but really we were up to the line with so much time that there was no need to worry about the play clock.

by foyesboys on Oct 26, 2009 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I saw that too

and it was especially fun watching eli/giants O struggle to get plays off last night and the az safeties screwing with his head.

by foyesboys on Oct 26, 2009 2:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

yea...

ONCE you notice it you will see it happens about EVERY play… Romo had all day to do all his pre-snap business and then get the play off….

by stephena on Oct 26, 2009 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

THESE

were the things that mad the loss to Denver and the narrow escape in KC so frustrating… this was a COACHABLE part of the game…

see the problem and get it fixed….

maybe they did….

by stephena on Oct 26, 2009 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Early on

they look quite on the same page as there were 2 false starts in a row (with one by witten!). But that might have been the first drive – the play right after the penalties was the romo scramble where he got hurt

"I just want to comment on how it’s become like a common thing in the [MLB] for guys to fall in love with [the Rangers’s] sloppy seconds." (thanks cstorm)

by ab03 on Oct 26, 2009 2:14 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

might as well post it here.. as i am feeling good about the win...

i had us 4 and 2 at this point with my early predictiions… and ta da, we are….

however, i had us losing to the Panthers and the Falcons, not Denver and NY.

so with that said… the loss to the Broncos is made up for a little by winning against an NFC opponent i thought we would lose to (Falcons)… but the loss to the Giants still hurts, as obviously a division loss hurts more than a ‘regular’ loss.

by stephena on Oct 26, 2009 2:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

just have to beat them in the Meadowlands then....

makes it a wash…assuming that most expected us to split with the GMEN

by McLovin9 on Oct 26, 2009 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This begs the question......

Why did it take three months from the start of training camp to get to this point? Isn’t this an indictment of the coaching staff? Not to be negative after such a great win, but sometimes I feel as though this team wins in spite of the coaching staff.

The team is highly undisciplined, and had a disorganized offense for a third of the season. What is going on here?

by bewareofdware on Oct 26, 2009 2:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

AGREED 100%

more than anything i would think that is why anyone would call for the coaching staff to be fired…

at least that is what i think…

Can’t make Roy Williams catch the ball, but you can get the play in quickly to allow for pre snap business, be penalty free on the snap (i.e. no movement, illegal shift, holding), and give him the CHANCE to have the ball thrown to him..

getting the play in
getting personnel in
getting defenses read
getting players in postion
getting players thinking

are all coaching issues… and this team has plenty of them…

i can take losing, even getting beat bad, if the deciding factor was not a ton of mistake as listed above… they won’t be perfect but eliminate much of the above and players will be in postion to play… and with our talent we should win MOST of those matchups…

by stephena on Oct 26, 2009 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This game - all of this improved
getting the play in
getting personnel in
getting defenses read
getting players in postion
getting players thinking

I’m glad to see these positive changes

Winning takes talent, to repeat takes character. - John Wooden

by BishopWest on Oct 26, 2009 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right

And my take is that this is something new they have been working on and the bye week gave them a chance to polish it.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Oct 26, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree. It looks like they put the bye week to good use.

Hopefully they will prepare for the rest of their games they same way. This is something Brooking keeps refering too.

by cowboy1966 on Oct 26, 2009 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

nope it has nothing to do with the buy week, its the hit on Romo's head (JK)

all seriousness aside, he started playing lights out after the whiplash at the end of the 17 run, one can only wander….

by dcfanz on Oct 26, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't it said over and over

it is all about execution. The little mistakes add up.

It could be that the litany of coaches over the past ten years have been bad. Or it could be that the players that came here didn’t pay attention to the details. Personally…

I think it is the culture. The sense of entitlement the press gives them when they do well and the but kissing the owner gives them when they do badly.

It really is hard to change a way of thinking.

McGruber!

by Mojoness on Oct 26, 2009 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes, and the quickest way to show change is to bench roy williams

if he improves he can be put back, but one for five should put him on the bench. no way he should be starting over patrick crayton

by just4fun on Oct 26, 2009 7:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It kinda bugs me...

First of all hate to complain about anything. We won. The Giants are in a skid. The Eagles are looking more like Bagels.

But I have a bit of an issue with Choice not getting a single carry. It would seem like he has been demoted… Now I know some of that was because the running game fizzled and Tony was hot but zero carries?

I am Ok with him not being the starter. That sort of thing happens when you have this much talent in front of him, but I do think he earned some playing time.

  (Yeah yeah he did play but I am talking playing time of some significance.)

McGruber!

by Mojoness on Oct 26, 2009 2:49 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

A healty Choice is better

than an injured Barber. This coaching staff goes too long with guys when it may serve the team better to make a change. I am sure Barber getting the money has a lot to do with this decision. It is the same reason RW gets more time than Hurd. IMO.

by cowboy1966 on Oct 26, 2009 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't know that Hurd

is better than Roy. It seems like RW has alot of potential.

I understand at least not playing Hurd because we don’t know that he will do well. We do know Choice is capable of performing the job and he has earned the chance.

McGruber!

by Mojoness on Oct 26, 2009 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know though...

It does seem like Wade is coaching to keep from losing his job as opposed to coaching to win football games.

There may be a slight distinction. For instance are you going to take a chance on an unknown reciever or play the guy the owner gave a testicle to bring to the team?

McGruber!

by Mojoness on Oct 26, 2009 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you go against the owners choice

or you don’t try and make him look good….and it fails you may be out of a job. However, if you are right you may be able to drop a line to the media about what a great pick-up it was for Jerry to get this guy (fill in the name) that helped get the “W” today.

by cowboy1966 on Oct 26, 2009 3:29 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good points all.

I think its the offense slowly but surely finding its identity. Get RW ribs healthy and find a few good plays for Bennett and look out.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Oct 26, 2009 4:21 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Correct

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Oct 26, 2009 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I also noticed the extra time

And that Romo seemed more comfortable and accurate.

And that the play calling was more subdued, with no stupid calls killing a drive.

Hope all of this was planned and worked out by the coaches.
But , still, did they not really see these things before?

by Realist Larry on Oct 26, 2009 5:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I remember them talking about this

in preseason. I think it took until the bye week to get it into their heads.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Oct 26, 2009 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anybody notice...

how EXCEPTIONALY well the rb’s picked up and blocked the blitz? I usually dont notice but it seemed they not only blocked well but were knocking guys on their ass

by fretman on Oct 26, 2009 5:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

There were alot of good things happening yesterday.

Unfortunately , as mentioned earlier it appeared to start coming together after Romo took that shot in the head. God, I hope he won’t need that each week. He did look the the best in the pocket that he had for a long time. You could almost see the confidence in his eyes at the line of scrimage. That was something I hadn’t seen for a while. He looked like the Romo of 2007. Keep it up boys.

by oldboysfan on Oct 26, 2009 6:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Actually he was playing well the entire game

The only misses at that point were drops. I remember wondering if the hit was going to hurt his accuracy, but it didn’t.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Oct 26, 2009 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A good observation.

Like some of those above, I found myself looking for the time left on the play clock because we so frequently are rushing at the end. I was pleasantly surprised when there seemed to be plenty of time, so much so that by the second half I’d forgotten about it pretty much. I think you’re absolutely correct about this “execution” as somebody put it being vitally important to that kind of performance by the offense in general, and Romo’s composure specifically.

"We'll see." --Bill Parcells

by Uncle Angus on Oct 26, 2009 6:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

BTW...

I love the fact that you never see the naysayers after a win.

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Oct 26, 2009 7:14 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

True that

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Oct 26, 2009 8:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, we are here.....

If your standard of excellence is a 10-6 team that loses in the first round of the playoffs….this is your team.

One data point does not make a trend….they played well against a good team for the first time this season. Can they sustain that effort? Time will tell. My beef is not with the players, it’s with the owner, who MUST have the reins in his hands as a GM and control over a mediocre coach. Teams with these chararcteristics do not win championships.

Winning championships is my standard. This team will not get close to winning it all.

by Cowboys Oldtimer on Oct 27, 2009 8:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow.

Who said anything about standards?

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Oct 27, 2009 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know, thats really a great picture of Romo

in front of his line with all of them watching him with the “OH SHIP” whats he doing in front of us loojk on their faces.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Oct 26, 2009 7:16 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Watching Brees play the Giants last week I noticed on a good proportion of snaps the Saints snapped very quickly almost immediately after stepping into the position. I don’t recall seeing any other team doing this before but it seemed to me to work well.
While this reduces the pre-snap read it also seemed to catch the D before they were fully prepared for the snap. Further, with the way D’s try to disguise what they are doing this may mean you catch people out of position, a blitzer too far back, a safety in the wrong zone etc.

Most teams line up and then let the QB stand there and read the D, call protections etc. By going quick on a proportion of the plays it means the D can’t assume that the QB is going to stand there until its down to a few seconds before snapping – as a result it makes it harder for them to disguise what they need to move into position earlier to make sure they don’t get caught out.

"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson

by BoyfromOz on Oct 26, 2009 9:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Favre did it

several times against the Stillers

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Oct 27, 2009 7:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for picking up on this, Dave...

When watching the game, it almost looked like they were going no-huddle. I was amazed at how calm Tony seemed before the play.

by BVandy on Oct 26, 2009 10:01 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Other positives from the game...

include the secondary looking much more sharp, especially late in the game. Newman’s play yesterday left me a little concerned, but for the most part the guys were actually looking for the ball and playing the ball. Then, late in the game they developed a swagger and were absolutely laying some hits. And finally, I am really beginning to like what I see from Jenkins. I think we may have ourselves a good DB after all.

by Rembrthe90s on Oct 27, 2009 1:55 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Zombie_cap3_small
The case against drafting a Safety early
N1328130042_30128772_75_small
Brandon Marshall
Small
Shawn Andrews
Ollogo3_copy_small
BTB.COM NCAA TOURNAMENT BRACKET CHALLENGE
Small
My "realistic" Mock

Recent FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Zzzzwww_small
Cowboy`s might have McCoy on their radar
Articlelarge_small
Represent Your Team in MHR's Live Mock Draft
Sb_xliv_ring_small
HutHut's Team Needs and Draft Predictions
Snf18bizd682_406043a_small
Nathan Vasher
Small
Anatomy of scouting a quarterback

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

A Deeper Look At The 2009 Cowboys Running Game

Photo +1 updates

Rams, Redskins Showing Interest In QB Sam Bradford

Photo +1 updates

Conflicting Reports On The Future Of 49ers GM Scot McCloughan

More from SBNation.com >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher