Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kickball - SB Nation presents KICK! at SXSW in Austin

Remedial Salary Capology: DeMarcus Ware's Contract

With the confirmation of DeMarcus Ware's contract extension, a question was posed as to how the salary cap works. A complete answer, with all of the legal terminology and cross-references to sections, items and subsections, could put grown men into the fetal position for an extended period of time.

So in an effort to convey some of the basics, I can only impart what I understand to be the essential concepts of the Salary Cap. For those who want to be brave, you can read the Collective Bargaining Agreement at the NFL Players website. Good luck with that!

To start, you will have to know what specific terms mean, such as Paragraph 5 Salary, Rule of 51, Proration and the like.

So let's get started.

More after the jump ...

Star-divide

Paragraph 5 Salary: This team is used to identify the fifth paragraph of an NFL Player Contract, which, as you may guess, details how much salary will be given to a player.

Rule of 51: This is a term commonly used to refer to Article XXIV, Section 7, subsection (a)(i) of the Collective Bargaining Agreement. It reads as follows:

"The highest applicable Salary set forth in Paragraph 5 of the NFL Player Contract shall be included in Team Salary in the Year earned, except that, between March 1 and the first day of the regular playing season, only the following amounts from Paragraph 5 shall be included for players whose Player Contracts are not among the Team’s 51 highest valued Player Contracts, tenders and Offer Sheets (as determined under this Section 7): (1) Any amount that exceeds the Minimum Active/Inactive List Salary for Undrafted Rookie Free Agents; and (2) Any amount that exceeds twice the applicable Minimum Active/Inactive List Salary for all other players."

What this basically means is that only the top 51 salaries on a team are used to calculate the team's salary cap, with the following two exceptions:

  1. Any amount that is more than the minimum base salary for an undrafted rookie, and
  2. Any amount that is more than twice the minimum base salary for all active or inactive players.

Since teams generally give undrafted rookies, this rule rarely comes into effect. But that's what it means.

Proration: This term identifies how signing bonuses are applied against the salary cap. In general, the amount of the signing bonus is divided by the length of the contract to determine how much of it applies to the cap for that year. Usually the maximum number of years you can use for proration is six (6) years, but there is one exception: the bonus can only be prorated a maximum of five years(5) for contracts entered into during the period after the last regular season game of the League Year preceding the Final Capped Year through the end of the Final Capped Year.

Since 2010 is an uncapped year, this means that Ware's signing bonus can be prorated over six years, but would have only been able to be prorated over five years if the extension had been done in this upcoming offseason.

Acceleration: This term defines what happens to the prorated portion of the signing bonus if a player is removed from the team's roster. This could mean a release, a trade, or if a player is lost via the waiver wire. Essentially, all future portions of the signing bonus are lumped together in the current year's cap number.

The exception to this rule is when a player is released after the June 1 date - a date that you have long heard of when teams are looking for additional players just before training camp.  Releasing a player after June 1 allows the team to count the current year's prorated bonus amount to this year's cap and the remaining prorated portions against next year's cap.

So if a contract from this past summer had a prorated $1 million signing bonus with 3 years left, releasing the player prior to June 1st would mean the cap number for the bonus against this year would have been $3 million, but releasing the player after June 1st would have $1 million against this year's cap and $2 million against next year's cap.

Incentives: Incentives, often called "Likely To Be Earned", or LTBE, are special items placed into a contract that allows a player to receive money. Some are simple, such as a roster bonus, meaning the player must simply be on the roster to get the extra money. Others include pertain to some sort of performance threshold, such as workout bonuses, honor bonuses (Pro Bowl, etc.), reporting bonuses, or number of sacks, or receptions, etc.

To determine if an incentive is likely to be earned, you review the player's and team's performance the prior year. If a player receives an incentive for accumulating 15 sacks, then his performance from last year is looked at. If the player had 15 or more sacks, then the incentive is likely to be earned. If he had 14 or fewer, then it is not likely to be earned. Only LTBE incentives could towards the current year's cap. However, it is not likely to be earned, and the player gets 15 or more sacks, then the incentive amount is counted against next year's cap.

DeMarcus Ware's contract numbers are as follows:

Ware received a $20 million signing bonus and had $5 million of salary added to this year's contract. He also receives $500,000 a year in workout bonuses from 2011 through 2015.

  • 2010 - $7.8 million
  • 2011 - $6.7 million
  • 2012 - $4.5 million
  • 2013 - $5.5 million
  • 2014 - $12.25 million
  • 2015 - $13.75 million

Total Salary: $50.5 million
Signing Bonus: $20 million
Additional 2009 salary: $5 million
Incentives: $2.5 million
Total: $78 million

(Note: autographied $1 bill from Jerry - priceless)

His $20 million signing bonus can only be prorated over 5 years, since 2009 is the Final Capped Year  (see Proration above). This means that the prorated portion of the bonus has a yearly impact of $4 million. So this year's cap number for the Cowboys was just increased by $9 million.

Adding the prorated bonus amounts to the salary, the cap hit is:

  • 2010 - $11.8 million
  • 2011 - $10.7 million
  • 2012 - $8.5 million
  • 2013 - $9.5 milliom
  • 2014 - $16.25 million
  • 2015 - $14.75 million

Now add the workout bonuses to 2011 and 2015, plus the additional salary money he got this year:

  • 2009 - $5 million
  • 2010 - $11.8 million
  • 2011 - $11.2 milliom
  • 2012 - $9 million
  • 2013 - $10 million
  • 2014 - $16.75 million
  • 2015 - $14.25 million

Grand Total: $78,000,000

Plus, of course, the extra buck from Jerry...

0 recs  |  Comment 62 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Dude, that's a lot of money

I’m just glad we got him locked up in big D for years to come

Winning takes talent, to repeat takes character. - John Wooden

by BishopWest on Oct 28, 2009 10:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow

I’d thought the contract would be heavily frontloaded to accomodate for the team’s currently decent cap status and next year’s possible lack of a cap. 33.5 Million in the last 2 years could be brutal, it seems likely D-Ware and the Cowboys will renegotiate an extension that swallows up those years (Like the Cardinals just did with Fitzgerald).

I like steak.

by Conjunction on Oct 28, 2009 10:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree

There’s no way we’re paying Demarcus $33MM over 2 years without crippling our cap those years. I imagine we’ll renegotiate or (as impossible as this seems right now) he’d be released and we’d take the accelerated signing bonus hit.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Oct 29, 2009 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you believe there will be a cap?

I think it is long gone and while their may be a luxury tax, I’m not so sure there will be the hard cap like there is now.

by jdramirez on Oct 29, 2009 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah...

if 2010 is uncapped; it’s not coming back.

The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.

by gee-roj on Oct 29, 2009 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lets hope football comes back too

there is no guarantee of that either past 2010.

by Becho on Oct 29, 2009 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The golden goose is not going anywhere.

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 29, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Could you imagine how many leagues would startup...

if the NFL didn’t play one year. The owners are way smarter than that. They know how good the NFL has it now and so do the players. These players aren’t going to miss to many paydays. The window of time to play pro ball is short.

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 29, 2009 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the UFL is starting this year...

because it thinks it can really take a foothold in 2011 when the lockout occurs. I think they are wrong, but I too hope that there is a season. It wouldn’t bother me nearly as much if we were awful like in this Quincy Carter years, but to have a team that is playoff capable and not have a chance… that would hurt.

by jdramirez on Oct 30, 2009 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree....actually the way they structured the cap and gave alot of his money upfront was brilliant

I wouldnt worry about that 11.8 million in 2010 because there will be no cap…even so, thats the money you pay for the best OLB/DE in the league…In a way Jerry had him by the nads because they could’ve franchised him for the next 3 years if they couldnt come to an agreement.

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 29, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Luxury Tax makes sense

but the Hard Cap has correlated with a lot of financial gains. Spurious? Perhaps, but parity has produced more drama, and Ratings

by AustonianAggie on Oct 29, 2009 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

remedial

Sheesh, I told you guys he was good at this stuff, and I know he tried to dumb it down for us, but you could easily get lost in the verbage. Anyway, thanks raul, btw, do you have any idea what the cowboys look like in cap space, probably not since we don’t know if there will be a salary cap next year. I guess I just answered myself.

by TONYINCC on Oct 28, 2009 10:55 PM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

For 2009

I thought they stayed about $14M under the cap to take care of Ware so my guess is that they still have room to work anything they deem necessary.

Congratulations Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com

by Raul Villaronga on Oct 28, 2009 11:24 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

absolutely

Ware will be the last player to re-sign this season.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 29, 2009 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

(O_o)

~Texas Massacre '09~

by TheHeat on Oct 28, 2009 11:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Repeat after me

Help me Obi-Ean, help me Obi-Wan …

Congratulations Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com

by Raul Villaronga on Oct 28, 2009 11:27 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Damn spell-check

8-(

Congratulations Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com

by Raul Villaronga on Oct 28, 2009 11:28 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Because it is cap friendly this year...

and next year there isn’t a cap, and then who knows after that. Jerry with the new stadium will be making money hand over fist and I think fat profits are secondary to winning. I don’t think Jerry will go the route of the Steinbrenners and lose money every year, but there will be enough pie for everyone.

by jdramirez on Oct 29, 2009 8:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

umm...

are many of the top contracts backloaded like this?…I feel like its possible Ware doesn’t even see the last two years. I know Clements for SF and Haynesworth for WAS were, but were jared allen’s, terrel suggs’, and dwight freeneys?

Only 20 million guaranteed? This sounds like a freakin steal, especially compared to haynesworth’s contract. This looks like 4 years 53 mil to me…if ware is still an mvp caliber player 4 years from now, the last two will probably be worth it, and now that i think about it, may not be a problem with the way the salary cap is ballooning.

But seriously, this is an outright steal.

by foyesboys on Oct 29, 2009 12:15 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Most contracts are backloaded like this

The backload usually is just to inflate the appearance of the contract, like 100 million for 7 years
Normally
-They re-do the contract before those last years come in to play
But sometimes
-Those 15mill a year price tags are cheap 5 years later, though prohibitive now

It’s unsettled what an uncapped year will do to salaries

by AustonianAggie on Oct 29, 2009 1:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's more than Haynesworth's.

Haynesworth’s contract is basically a 4 year, $48 million contract. Ware’s is basically a 4 year, $51 million contract. And, like you said, if they decide to keep the life of the contract, those numbers may be pretty reasonable for a guy that age and skill level at that time. Haynesworth’s fifth year on the other hand, is like a $29 million year. Freeney’s contract is similar to Ware’s, where is 6/72 is more like 4/46. I couldn’t find details of Allen and Suggs, but they are probably similar.

I think it’s more than 20 mil guaranteed, too, i think. He got 20 mil signing bonus, 5 mil added to this season salary, so basically a 25 mil bonus, and usually the first year is guaranteed i think , so like 32.8 mil guaranteed.

by Baked Potato Soup on Oct 29, 2009 1:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seem to recall it was 40 mil guaranteed

Also, so much was placed into the contract through an 18 month period beginning three months ago simply because of the uncapped year. With what marquee players have been making in new contracts over the last 18 months, the new CBA will likely balloon cap numbers, so the life of this contract shouldn’t be exhorbitant as far as cap is concerned. Dallas is unlikely to hand out another contract this large for some time, if ever. Jerry got a hell of a deal for arguably the best defensive player in football.

Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"

by White Wolf on Oct 29, 2009 6:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your comparison to Haynesworth's contract is helpful, Potato.

Ware’s contract is essentially for 3 mil more, so he (and his agent) felt good about it. Plus Ware got more guaranteed.
Basically, Ware got paid as the best defensive player in football, rightly so I think, but in a deal that makes more sense for the Cowboys, too?

Thanks for wading through all this, Raul!

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Oct 29, 2009 8:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok thanks

25 mil is still a big improvement compared to haynesworth, but there is less risk with ware anyway imo. 40 mil guarenteed for a guy whose played well in contract years is a ton of money – they can’t choose to cut him if hes not the same player in 2 years cause everythings guarenteed

by foyesboys on Nov 1, 2009 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

T.O.'s goal for the year

“I want to have a better year than Roy E. Williams” He said at yesterday’s Bills press conference.

It’s kind of sad that Team Obliterator can’t let it go. I can’t wait for the snow in Buffalo.

by CowboyCurtis on Oct 29, 2009 6:06 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What is sad is that he's on pace.

Releasing TO was supposed to help funnel more ball to Williams. It’s disturbing that with Romo at QB, Williams isn’t doing better than TO with Fitzpatrick or the Stanford kid.

by jdramirez on Oct 29, 2009 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he was joking

Making fun of himself for not having a good year.

by staubachfan on Oct 29, 2009 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sure he was.

There is some mean-spiritedness in the comment though.

by jdramirez on Oct 29, 2009 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

some truth in it as well

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Oct 29, 2009 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude's a psychic vampire

he’s tiring to listen too, and talk about, feeds off our attention.

If TO had anything left he’d talk about Competing with Miles Austin

by AustonianAggie on Oct 29, 2009 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rumor that TO and RW actually talked before the comment and made the joke with each other

RW made a similar comment on wednesday about racing TO to 4 receptions. Again, I think they were both just joking. No big deal.

by staubachfan on Oct 29, 2009 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I could be wrong

But since next year is uncapped, this can only be prorated 5 years…or am I misreading section XXIX:

…the bonus can only be prorated a maximum of five years(5) for contracts entered into during the period after the last regular season game of the League Year preceding the Final Capped Year through the end of the Final Capped Year.

The last regular season game of the League Year preceding the Final Capped Year (2009) occurred last January. This also explains the difficulty teams had with the 1st Round picks.

Thus your numbers are a little off…but only by a $Million or so.

He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson

by Fighter15 on Oct 29, 2009 6:52 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Correct

… and updated. Thanks.

Congratulations Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com

by Raul Villaronga on Oct 29, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

OH! One more thing

Isn’t it also possible to advance more prorated money into this year, thus lessening the impact on the out years?

He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson

by Fighter15 on Oct 29, 2009 6:54 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The contract can always be renegotiated...

and if you have caproom this year, you can restructure the contract so you use that room and then open up space in later years.

However, with 2010 being an uncapped year, people are making balloon payments on players like the Haynesworth deal where they get about 40 million just in that year. The rest of the contract is either monopoly money, or very cap friendly.

by jdramirez on Oct 29, 2009 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This all seems for naught considering the cap will be gone in 2010...

and then will forever be banished to the woodshed in 2012 after the lockout.

by jdramirez on Oct 29, 2009 8:06 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good info, but what I would really like to know is...

How much we will be under the cap as of now in 2010 and who will be free agents then.

by quincyyyyy on Oct 29, 2009 8:12 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Here's the problem with that...

Most of us here are Cowboys fans and some of use are optimistic enough to believe they will make it to the conference championship, if not better. I believe the top 6 teams are not allowed to go on a buying frenzy and are only allowed to spend the same amount of money on free agents, that they lose in free agents.

The Cowboys aren’t really expected to lose anyone next year, maybe Sensabaugh and Spears, but they aren’t going to break the bank to the point to where we can then go and pick up several top tier players (offensive lineman).

Not to mention, the best way a team can have consistent success is not through free agency (e.g. Washington Redskins), but rather through the draft (e.g. Patriots, Eagles, & Colts). Fill holes with free agency, but don’t build your team with it.

by jdramirez on Oct 29, 2009 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Austin will be a Restricted FA

He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson

by Fighter15 on Oct 29, 2009 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Same with Spears and Sensabaugh

Assuming of course there’s no cap. And that would mean unlimited ability to sign them.

With a new CBA? Who knows what the deal will bring, but you can bet that provisions will be made to allow teams to “balance their books”.

He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson

by Fighter15 on Oct 29, 2009 8:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They could use the franchise tag on Spears, but thats not going to happen....

Sensabaugh and Austin will probably get new deals after the offseason….Im not sure Spears will be here…

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 29, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Will there be a franchise tag to use after this year?

There will be no contract in place. Isn’t the tag part of the contract?

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 29, 2009 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They would still be able to use a Franchise Tag and Transistion tags next year....
Teams currently have one franchise tag to use to restrict player movement. In the event of an uncapped year teams would have one franchise tag and two transition tags. Teams with two, or three, stars entertaining free agency wouldn’t have to choose which one to keep.
To keep balance between the haves and the have-nots playoff teams

Jerry could be thinking this next year:

If anything the lack of a salary cap in 2010 would present a rare one of a kind opportunity for owners to shed salary.

Teams would be able to dump bloated contracts they don’t want without suffering the regular salary-cap ramifications. One such candidate could be Oakland quarterback JaMarcus Russell, who is scheduled to count $15 million against the cap for 2010, only $3 million of which is guaranteed. So if the Raiders wanted to pay the $3 million to Russell and let him go, they wouldn’t have to pay his base salary or take the severe cap hit. It’s a similar story in Tennessee with quarterback Vince Young, who has a $4.25 million roster bonus due March 10 to go along with a salary of $2.8 million. If the Titans decided to release him, they’d clear out over $7 million worth of payments.

http://www.3rdstringsafety.com/2009/10/no-one-wins-with-an-uncapped-year/

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Oct 29, 2009 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks, that clears up a lot of questions

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 29, 2009 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ken Hamlin

will probably be gone.

by CowboyCurtis on Oct 29, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wouldn't be surprised

considering his bloated contract…

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Oct 29, 2009 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

we can only pray

Ich bin ein Berliner--JFK

by HudBaby on Oct 29, 2009 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jerry might be like kid in a candy store.

seeing some good players without a home.

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 29, 2009 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

With or without the cap?

Being snarky, but obviously it will depend on the CBA.

There simply is no way to tell because it will depend entirely on how the “revenue” is defined and the percentage that is applied to player salaries.

The one thing that is certain is that the formula will change and my guess is that all teams will be given a reprieve if they are “over the cap” in 2010 based on a new formula. If the CBA is not renewed, then obviously 2010 is uncapped and the ’Boys will be unlimited.

The quality FAs will be few, as most of the young guys will be Restricted (FA rules go from 4 to 6 years), but the list of high-priced veterans should be extensive as many of the small-market teams will dump salaries.

He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson

by Fighter15 on Oct 29, 2009 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very true.

Most of the good free agents from last year got big contracts (Canty or Haynesworth), and there are then mid-level free agents that will become restricted free agents. Then there are the players who just finished their sixth year and are unrestricted free agents. However, if they haven’t gotten a long term contract and have been playing year to year at this point, chances are they are already on their way out of the league. Think Keith Davis.

Even though Richard Seymor will be a free agent, do you think the Raiders will just let him go free aftering giving a 1st round pick for him. They will franchise him just to get something back.

by jdramirez on Oct 29, 2009 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Austin and Sensabaugh

I think the original plan was to front load Ware’s contract even more, but with Austin blowing up and Sensabaugh being solid they had to move money around a bit. Jerry will wait and let Austins numbers drop a bit and make sure he can excel against top tier corners and extend him this year and work on Sensbaugh next offseason.

by Red Raider on Oct 29, 2009 8:38 AM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

I love...lamp

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Oct 29, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brick

Are you just looking at things in the office and saying that you love them?

Are you ready for some football???

by APerfectStar on Oct 29, 2009 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Zzzzwww_small
my mock version2
Small
A Fool's Mock
Small
Restricted Free Agents: Sign Away now, or wait and trade for them later? Following up on: Jared Gaither?
Tcb_small
Jamal Williams anyone?
Small
What about Jared Gaither?

Recent FanPosts

Miles_austin_small
Quincyyyyy's highly anticipated All Bad Boy draft
Small
Maurkice Pouncey Scouting Report
Texas_small
New ESPN Mocks
Small
Dez, Roy and Marty B
Miles_austin_small
SB nation's MockingTheDraft 32 team mock (need help! ASAP)
Tom-landry-at_small
Why Dallas Will Not Look To Re-sign Terrell Owens

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Dawgs By Nature
Around the Pound (3/12): TE Ben Watson Signs, Heiden Cut; Holmgren Comments on QB Situation
Arrowhead Pride
Friday Night Open Thread
Canal Street Chronicles
Mickey Loomis Press Conference Transcript: Saints State of the Union

SPONSORS


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher