Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Chat Highlights with the Mile High Report

Photo

by Ed Andrieski - AP

In lieu of our weekly five Q & As with opposing teams' bloggers, John Bena from SBN's Mile Hile Report was kind enough to answer questions regarding the Broncos in a FanPost here on BTB. This generated some great, hardcore football analysis of Sunday's Dallas @ Denver matchup.

To provide an overview of the discussion, we pulled five of your questions along with Bena's answers to create this post.

Make the jump for the five Q&As.

Star-divide

NDCowboy8: Much of the credit for the Broncos going 3-0 this season goes to the defense. Who has really stepped up on defense and really boosted the unit's play? I was also curious how much of an impact Brian Dawkins is having on the D?

MHR: There has been improvement on all three levels of the defense. Up front, Ronald Fields, along with Kenny Peterson and Ryan McBean, have been what they need to be as 3 down-linemen. They are taking up space, holding the line of scrimmage, and not allowing the OL to get to the Broncos linebackers.

There are a ton of ‘star’ players, but each of these guys is a professional that knows how to do their job. So far, it’s working.

In my mind, however, the defensive backs have been the biggest upgrades, especially at safety. Brian dawkins looks to be playing as well as ever, and Renaldo Hill and Andre Goodman were instant upgrades coming in from Miami. Then, of course, there’s Champ Bailey.

At linebacker, all the publicity goes to Elvis Dumervil because of his hot start, but Andra Davis has been a huge surprise in the middle next to D.J. Williams. He seems to be rejuvenated by getting out of Cleveland and is playing the run better than I have ever seen him. D.J. Williams is a tackling machine, and Mario Haggan was voted a caption by his teammates – which shows the type of respect he has earned.

DoomsdayD75: How is Elvis Dumervil being used in the new Broncos defense? I haven’t been able to watch him this year, but looking at the stats, he’s off to a great start (much better than Ware).

Any analysis on how Moreno is progressing would be great as well.

One last thing, where the hell is Royal? He seemed perfect for the Welker-type role in McD’s offense, but he has been non existent so far.

MHR: Dumervil – When Elvis was drafted by the Broncos I was a bit surprised because I thought he was a better fit as an OLB because his strength was his speed and long arm-reach. While only 5-10, Dumervil’s reach is that of a man 6-4 or so. When he played DE, it was a lot easier for offensive linemen to engage him, using their size to overpower him at the point of attack. Now, since he is standing up, Dumervil gets a good push, allowing him to gain leverage on his opposition.

Royal – He is perfect, but to give credit to opposing defenses they are doing a good job of doubling him, and chucking him off the line, making it tough for him to get into his routes. The Broncos have gone to the matchups that are left over – usually getting the ball to Brandon Stokley and Jabar Gaffney. Now, with Brandon Marshall coming on, I expect things to open up for Royal a bit.

Moreno - You can see with Knowshon it is only a matter of time. The injury in the pre-season, coupled with his 7 days hold out, slowed his progress but he is making up for lost time fast. Knowshon still relies on his athleticism a bit too often, but he is a load to bring down and his ‘pass pro’ is really improving each week. Knowshon, along with Correll Buckhalter, combined for 35 carries and 198 yards last week.

What has impressed me most about Dumervil is how quickly he has picked up the other facets of playing OLB – pass coverage and run defense. He has been able to quickly and effectively switch from a pass rusher to tackler in the middle of a play. He is also in great condition which allows him to play at a high level for 60 minutes.

BishopWest: The Cowboys are leading the league right now with 193.7 rushing yards per game. I know that Felix Jones is out for the Denver game, which hurts us and helps you. But even with M.Barber, T.Choice and our mauling OL, the Cowboys are very formidable in the run game.

If our OC Garrett was looking for a weak spot to run against your front seven, in your opinion, where would that weakness be?

MHR: All along I would have said right up the middle, but the Broncos have been solid inside. I still think that is your best bet, and biggest strength. With the size advantage up front, it would be smart of the ’Boys to attack the Broncos straight on instead of trying to string them out. The strength of the defense is the speed, and the best way to neutralize speed is to run right at it.

Mandmeisterx: How are the Broncos special teams? This has been one of our weaknesses for years, but it is finally starting to become a strength for us. If this game is close, as I expect it will be, special teams could be the key. Who wins the battle here?

MHR:That is a great question. From a kicking standpoint, Matt Prater was just named the Special Team Player of the Month, which bodes well. Not only has Prater been solid with long-range FGs, he is tied for the league-lead in touchbacks. The best coverage unit is one that watches the return-team kneel down in the endzone.

As for the return game, the Broncos are still searching for someone to grab that role by the horns. Peyton Hillis, Eddie Royal and LaMont Jordan have returned kicks this year, and Royal has been returning punts.

sportsfan900: Who do think will win? Yeah, I know you will say Broncos but be honest and say who might win. I'm a bit nervous about the Cowboys; this will be important to me because I want us to be in a nice position of 3-1.

MHR: For the Broncos to win, the recipe is pretty simple -

1 – Limit the Run – The Cowboys are #1 in the NFL in rushing, so this a no-brainer. Notice I said ‘limit the run’. If the Cowboys are as good a running team as they have showed so far then stopping the run completely is out of the question. What the Broncos need to do then is force the Cowboys to earn every yard. Keep the yards per carry to around 4.5 yards, instead of the 6.8 the ’Boys are averaging now.

2. No Mistakes – That has been the Broncos strength so far. They have turned the ball over only twice this season(2 fumbles) and Kyle Orton has yet to throw a pick. It is imperative that the Broncos not give the Cowboys a short field or easy points.

3. Force Mistakes – Conversely, the Broncos need to force a couple of turnovers themselves.

One thing I will say, I feel as confident as you do if the Broncos force the Cowboys to pass. The strength of the Broncos defense is the DBs. If you feel good about taking Marshall and Royal out of the game I feel the same about Bailey and Goodman taking Williams and Crayton out as well.

That leaves Witten, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Broncos double him(under-over) to try and limit him.

Thanks again to John Bena and all the MHR bloggers for your participation and insight into this game. It made for a fun week and we wish you well in all your AFC dreams. Good luck and...

...Go Cowboys!

0 recs  |  Comment 53 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Doh!

I was hoping for some fresh stuff, but strangely, I feel like I know the Broncos pretty well after reading all of the posts in the past few days. It’s almost felt like a rival week with all the back and forth jabbing going on. Here’s to what should be a good game!

Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.

by sublimezg on Oct 3, 2009 9:39 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Ware

You have to think that there are going to be weeks where Ware just dominates the QB and this is just such a week in my opinion. Orton is not a very good QB in my opinion and I think we are looking at maybe 4 or 5 sacks and a couple of picks.

Ahab the Arab
I say keep an eye on this kid, this Louie the Looper. He's going places!

by damnarab2 on Oct 3, 2009 10:14 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Someone is drinking the coolade.

It would be nice, but I don’t think it will happen.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 3, 2009 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think he gets sacked very often because

he throws the ball away when he feels the pressure coming

I wouldn’t bet on more than a sack or two this week

by BishopWest on Oct 3, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

orton doesnt get enough credit for what he brings..

He’s played well in chi. And den. And I think this short ball control off. Is perfect for him..

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Oct 3, 2009 12:55 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you

Orton’s play in Chicago can be used as a small reference point to his play now. It’s not entirely fair for people to judge his current and future play on what he did in Chicago for a lot of reasons. Here’s a couple:

1) Offensive line in Denver is 5 times better than Chicago’s. Easily.
2) Marshall, Royal and Stokley are better than Hester and the rest of Chicago’s receivers.

Undoubtedly, Orton will be forever compared to Cutler because of what happened, but the offensive scheme being used here is much better for Orton’s style and skills.

"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu

by Joe Medina on Oct 3, 2009 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Orton's Da Man

I always felt Orton got a bad rap in Chi. Remember he took them to the playoffs as a #1 seed as a rookie. Granted, the defense that year was dominating, but he didn’t do anything to hurt the team, ie. no turnovers. But he didn’t do much else. Then last year I thought he did a decent job, they just have no WRs (what does that say about your front office when you try to turn your PR/KR/3-4th CB into your #1 WR?) and their defense wasn’t near as good. Cutler has a much better arm and more upside than Orton, but seems like the Bronco fans have been pretty hard on Orton.

by selke99 on Oct 3, 2009 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree completely...

the mentality of the common Broncos fan seems to be similar to something like this:

They were blinded in recent years by Mike Shanahan. He’s a good coach, but his front office skills left much to be desired. He was constantly making stupid decisions regarding personnel, and he always had the majority of Broncos Country believing we were just a player away. A lot of things contributed to Mike being shown the door, but blowing a 3 game division lead with 3 games left in the season is grounds for any coach to be dismissed.

Broncos fans have been so hard on Orton because he’s not flashy like Cutler. I agree that Cutler has a stronger arm, but most sensible fans can agree that a strong arm doesn’t mean anything when those throws are sent into triple coverage 50% of the time. I think Broncos fans were so against Orton, not because it’s Orton, but because of the way he was aquired. Had he been picked up in free agency or something like that, Bronco fans wouldn’t be nearly as upset about it.

Personally, I think Broncos fans are fickle as hell. I know it sounds arrogant, and I don’t mean it to, but Broncos fans have been spoiled with a rich history of overall success. It’s not often that teams win back to back Super Bowls. This past few years sent up a lot of red flags to me about Mike Shanahan. His benching of Plummer for Cutler in 06 was the first major one, and last years injuries were another. When you have 6 or 7 running backs going down in one season, it’s probably a result of poor conditioning, more than anything else.

Sorry I got long winded, the Orton hatred is a soft subject for me because it’s unwarranted.

"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu

by Joe Medina on Oct 3, 2009 7:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

4 or 5 sacks and a couple of picks

= )

I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok.
Shaquille O'Neal

by tannji on Oct 3, 2009 11:39 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If the Broncos sell out to stop our running game

It will mean a big day for Romo and our receivers for sure.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 3, 2009 11:58 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

all they'd need to do,

is leverage dumervill’s speed on the edges to force the cowboys’ running game up the middle, where it’s weakest. then if they double witten, it’s up to the Cowboys’ WRs to find space. I think the game is going to be much more hard-fought than all the homers believe.

Cowboys win, of course.

by Joey2zs on Oct 3, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats the way most DCs play it,run first.

Make Romo pass and he will give you a chance at 2 or 3 int. Till he proves them wrong I think thats what you can expect to see. We don’t have wideouts that scare anyone most good DBs think they need no help. Witten and Marty B. thats the key to the passing game right now. LBs and safetys can’t cover them 1 on 1.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 3, 2009 12:24 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Romo...

…has only thrown multiple INTs in the same game 9 times of the 42 games he has started. That’s only 21% of the time, which seems like a small probability to me.

I agree on your idea of getting Witten and Bennett involved in the game plan more this week. Actually I think they have been a part of the game plan versus TB, NYG, and CAR, but the 30% completion rate of passes going to Bennett in the last three games needs to greatly improve. If I was a DC, I don’t see Bennett as a too much of a threat right now, which might work in the Cowboys’ favor. If Garrett and Romo can catch DEN in a bad match-up this would be a great week for Bennett to get a chunk of yards and possibly hit paydirt.

by BishopWest on Oct 3, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

This week is the week to get Bennett more involved for sure.

by torchindefenses on Oct 3, 2009 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you not think Denver plays the run first?

With out Felix the pass to the back for big yards is not a big worry. I think 8 in the box is the D until it doesn’t work. Back to back 200 yds rushing games you would have to be crazy not to. Maybe Romo can work the middle like in TB it will take them out of it.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 3, 2009 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wonder where StillHatestheGiants has been lately.

Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"

by White Wolf on Oct 3, 2009 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I laugh every time i read your quote

lololol

Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.

by sublimezg on Oct 3, 2009 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

It doesn’t get old because I can relate to it. At least I could in my youth.

Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"

by White Wolf on Oct 3, 2009 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Edge goes to the home team in this one

Can’t believe I just said that but the way Dallas has been playing, unless they come together in all phases they could get beat. These teams are evenly matched at this point into the season and that usually means the home team wins. Dallas has more talent as a whole but Denver is playing better all around as a team.

17-14 Denver

by torchindefenses on Oct 3, 2009 1:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Home team?

This year DEN is 100% wins at home (1 of 1)
This year DAL is 100% wins away (1 of 1)

Posted this already – but I still think it is worthy of consideration here – DEN has only won 54% of their home games over the last 3 years and DAL was won 62.5% of their away games during that same time.

The Cowboys may even focus better away from the circus atmosphere of JerryWorld.

by BishopWest on Oct 3, 2009 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My mind is building a theory about our secondary

For several years now our secondary has been pretty weak. Obviously a lot of it has to do with personnel like Roy, Reeves, Henry, ect. But now what? Why are we still getting torched after the revamp? Weren’t we all excited about our new corners? I mean they’ve both showed signs of being really good, so how is it that we’re sitting near the bottom of the league in pass defense after facing three traditionally non-pass-happy-teams? Not to mention the QB’s we’ve faced are questionable at best, with the exception of maybe Eli (I hated saying that)?

On the flip side, where are our receivers? Yea, Witten is basically our #1 receiver, but why is that? It’s because he gets open, plain and simple. It’s because Romo has a lot of trust in him to be open and to make the catch. While I love having an amazing TE, it sure would be nice to have at least one elite WR. Roy has not and probably will not prove to be an elite WR for us. Serviceable yes, elite, no. Witten has 19 catches on the season so far for 181 yards followed by Crayton 8/183, and then Roy 8/179. 8 receptions in 3 games from your leading WR is not very good. The yardage isn’t bad, but the reception part is what’s bothersome to me. Roy and Crayton are on track to get about 43 receptions on the year. Those are numbers our #2 and possibly even #3 receivers should be getting, not our #1.

Without making this too long, the theory is that perhaps our WR’s really aren’t good enough to challenge our DB’s much in practice, and that’s why they are getting torched in games. What do you guys think?

Oh and I predict that next, or late in this season that Ogletree surpasses Miles and Hurd for the #3 spot.

Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.

by sublimezg on Oct 3, 2009 1:33 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

thoughts about WRs

RW is our #1 WR right now, but not necessarily our best option to catch passes:

  1. Right now until they (Romo and RW) really get comfortable, its gonna be a while before Romo has the trust to throw it to RW over Witten.
  2. Or until Witten becomes blanketed, which rarely happens.
  3. RW usually gets the most unfavorable matchup and is still catching passes. its not like witten is getting the top corner and RW is getting the LBer.

note: look at alot of teams this year. TEs are definitely becoming more dynamic and leading teams in receptions. they have just as much ability but matchups are so much more favorable with a LB/Safety coverage with the entire field to work with

Ogletree …. problem is that it is not his job to win. he cant get in the game
its Miles/Hurds job to lose. Once they start dissappearing or making mistake … Ogletree wiill get his shot. that has to happen first and then we can see what Ogletree can do against real players in real time

Into video games? Check out GamersBeyond.com for reviews/vids on latest video games from all platforms (PC, PS3, xbox, Wii)

by fuji1232 on Oct 3, 2009 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I haven't watched that closely

but when I do , I’m not seeing Roy being doubled. You’re #1 should have no problem beating single coverage pretty regularly.

Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.

by sublimezg on Oct 3, 2009 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes RW will be lucky to get 2 or 3 catches.

Bailey will be on him all day he is still one of the best cover corners in the game. One of the other WO needs to show up.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 3, 2009 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is Roy really that far off from being a "number 1" WR

I hate to bring up TO again, but in the first 3 games last year he had 10 receptions for 193.

Roy is only short 2 receptions and 14 yards (that’s not really a MAJOR difference over a 3 game spread)

I do think that TO pulled a lot of double coverage his way, sort of freeing up other receivers. I don’t see Roy being doubled the same way right now.

by BishopWest on Oct 3, 2009 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and that's the difference

that and TO wasn’t all that amazing last year in terms of a #1 as far as receptions and yardage go

Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.

by sublimezg on Oct 3, 2009 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i have heard several

Times that they keep a safety over roys side for help.

by TONYINCC on Oct 3, 2009 6:52 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

agree

just not as much as when “The Player” was in Big D

by BishopWest on Oct 3, 2009 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

YES, way off from being an elite WR.

He’s doesn’t have the numbers of a good #2. He is paid like a #1 that is another mistake Jerry made.He gave alot for an average WR. Bad GM move.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 3, 2009 3:38 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

not when u couple him with a good QB like Romo

Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.

by sublimezg on Oct 3, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If this GM Jerry fellow occasionally gambled on a receiver in the first three rounds...

…..Maybe he wouldn’t have to pay through the teeth for other team’s overpriced goods. Just a thought.

by MadMick on Oct 3, 2009 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope so too

I’m thinking he and Romo get on the same page a little better throughout the year

by BishopWest on Oct 3, 2009 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK i just went to the bronco website....whew..

they really think they’re a bunch of elevated thinkers…you guy’s should read some of crap that’s over there…no disrespect because i was born in c.o. but….WOW…

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Oct 3, 2009 7:33 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I know

http://www.milehighreport.com/2009/10/2/1062868/stretch-of-the-imagination

A human mind develops from a primarily perceptual method of functioning in our childhood to the conceptual method of functioning in adulthood. This is aided by the hierarchical stacking of concepts in order to improve intellectual efficacy and by what could be called “cognitive experience” i.e. repeated handling of concepts and ideas that refines and clarifies their use. But above all, the process is a volitional one. It requires continuous effort and focus, personal responsibility for observing, judging and integrating the facts of reality. To proceed from childhood cognitive functioning to adult functioning is not an automatic process.

This is football dude…. . . . .

Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.

by sublimezg on Oct 3, 2009 8:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, it is football.

football is more of a cerebral game than you give it credit for.

TAKE IT!!!

by Joe Medina on Oct 3, 2009 8:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure... If you're a coach.

The playing part is pretty elementary. That whole tirade pretty much boils down to “we gets no respect!”. I only skimmed it, but that’s pretty much what I took away from it. That, and he contradicts everything he worked so hard to convey at the end, which pretty much voids the whole mess and makes it a terrible waste of reading time.

Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.

by sublimezg on Oct 3, 2009 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I ain't reading ALL that.

That little snippet is enlightening enough.

by MadMick on Oct 3, 2009 8:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL, some of the posts might take it farther than people would expect…. but your giff was funny for two entirely different reasons = )
I can just avoid what I don’t feel like reading. On the Bright side, we don’t have any flame wars there whatsoever. We do have the MHR University, light homerism, some pretty funny guys sharing their thoughts, some pretty smart guys sharing their thoughts, and very little of the Bubba Factor. You guys have a good thing here as well… just different than ours = )

Good luck tomorrow, sorta. (every fan base I have wished luck to has lost a game the next day, for what it’s worth)

I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok.
Shaquille O'Neal

by tannji on Oct 3, 2009 8:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then odds are not in your favor

Muahahahhahhaahhaha!

Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.

by sublimezg on Oct 3, 2009 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Broncos are in the same boat as the Cowboys

We are both rated lower by the talking heads than we should be. BTW, your name would sound better as JoeCalifornia or CaliforniaJoe. Or is there some other meaning there?

Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"

by White Wolf on Oct 3, 2009 8:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

regarding my name:

It’s just an old email address that my brother made for me a long time ago (like 10 years or so). It’s always been my username everywhere. Mostly just so I don’t have to remember different stuff for different sites.

Regarding the ratings:
Until we wax SD, and find a way to beat a few “shoe in” Super Bowl contenders, no one will take us seriously. That’s fine, I could care less what anyone else thinks. I’ll tell you one thing though, living in Patriots country now (yuck), I have never seen more arrogant, pompous fans in my entire life. I grew up in Colorado, went to high school in California, and now live in Mass, and there is more bandwagon fans here than anywhere I’ve ever been. These people believe the Patriots are guaranteed to be in the Super Bowl this year. It’s quite pathetic.

TAKE IT!!!

by Joe Medina on Oct 3, 2009 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL.

I liked it when the Pats won their first SB, but they’ve become a loathed organization throughout the NFL. I truly believe they were cheating. I remember the season before they got caught, the announcers in a game I was watching kept saying over and over, “It just seems like the Patriots know what’s coming.” Then to act like, “how dare you?” and take it out on the whole league going 16-0, for the first time in my life I enjoyed a Giants victory. I LOVED watching the Pats go down in flames, and blow their perfect season.

Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"

by White Wolf on Oct 3, 2009 9:11 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

It was nice watching them fail wasn't it?

I didn’t live in Mass at the time, but if I did, I would have been rocking an Eli jersey all day. I’m not a Giants fan or anything, but to see them lose in their perfect season was just sweet karma. I hate Eric Mangini, but I think blowing the whistle on the Patriots and their cheating system was brilliant.

TAKE IT!!!

by Joe Medina on Oct 3, 2009 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Garrett DOES Have a Running Problem
Images_small
Playoff Chances: Week 10
Captain_small
NFL Power Rankings - Week 11 - Final Edition
Captain_small
Seven Statistical Nuggets To Take The Edge Off
Barberbench_small
A good problem to have: no major draft needs (poll)

Recent FanPosts

Fox-jimmyjohnson_20_3
Are the Redskins the key to the division..?
Avatar_small
Mike Jenkins Bicep Treatment
Small
Anyone scared Watkins must play again...?
Small
It Isn't JUST About December
Small
More Witten please!!!
Arnold_small
To run, or not to run... That's Redball's dilemma
2938_avatar_64x64_small
I would like to extend a sincere thank you to Bill Belicheat

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher