The VRR: Seahawks (2-4) @ Cowboys (4-2)
The two games before their bye last week, the Seattle Seahawks have respectively been super hot, and then super cold. It would behoove the Cowboys to prepare for the former, so there is no chance of losing out on a much needed three-game win streak.
Dallas must stay focused no matter which Seattle team comes to play.
"For right now, it's good to be in a good position," defensive end Marcus Spears said. "But at the end of the day, you've got to put more wins together and be a solid team throughout the whole season in order to be what you want to be."
This Sunday, the team with the identity crisis will be the visitors.
The Seahawks have no idea what they are: the team that beat Jacksonville 41-0 or the team that didn't convert a third down in a 27-3 loss to Arizona.
"It's amazing how one week can change the way you think, isn't it?" Seattle coach Jim Mora.
More VRR after the jump.

CB Marcus Trufant will play for the first time this season, but the Seahawks may bring him along slowly.
Sunday, Trufant will be running around covering the Cowboys’ Miles Austin, Roy Williams and Patrick Crayton. The plan is to have Trufant play in the nickel defense, at his usual spot on the left side. On the other downs, the corners will continue to be Ken Lucas and Josh Wilson.
"Having a play run at you every 30 or 40 seconds at that position can be difficult," is the way coach Jim Mora put it this week. "So, we need to see where he is endurance-wise. Obviously, he’s got to knock some of the rust off in terms of his technique, but he’s doing that, and he’s worked hard."
Hasselbeck and Housh are trying to get on the same page.
Houshmandzadeh had four catches for 34 yards and has grown frustrated over the situation. The pair spent extra time working together during the bye week.
"We'll find out when the games matter," Houshmandzadeh said. "It's easy to do at practice, when no one's on you."
The quarterback believes there's no easy explanation for his inability to get the ball more to his top target.
"Just trying to figure out what we're good at," Hasselbeck said. "One of those things is just to be automatic with some of the guys I throw the ball to and get some routes where we feel that confidence, that 'automatic' confidence. That breeds consistency. We're close some times, but we misfire. We have to fix that as quickly as we can."
Here is Seattle's injury report.

On the verge of a three-game win streak, Coach Phillips is keeping the players focused on their mistakes.
"We have to continue to just eat our humble pie," linebacker Keith Brooking told reporters in Irving. "We played one really solid game across the board, offensively, defensively and special teams. But at the end of the day, you have to look at the big picture. We have to keep it going. This is a 'What have you done for me lately?' league."
Slapping the Falcons (4-2) gave the Cowboys (4-2) a two-game winning streak and catapulted them into the playoff conversation. But all the good vibes Dallas took from that game will disappear should it lose to Seattle (2-4) on Sunday.
"We haven't won the Super Bowl or anything," linebacker Bradie James said. "We haven't even won a playoff game. We're excited. We have some confidence. But we need to be consistent."
The Cowboys haven't won three in a row since Weeks 11-13 of last season.
"Winning a couple of games, doing well in a couple of games sets a trend, but it doesn't make you a consistent football team," Phillips said. "To be consistent, you have to win three in a row."
Penalties, penalties, penalties. The Cowboys really need to cut those out...right? Hmm, Todd Archer takes a closer look at the team's record when it commits eight penalties or more in a game.
Last week, Atlanta's second touchdown came in part because Stephen Bowen was called offside on a third-down play. But it got me to thinking about how the penalty issue has been a big deal for a while.
They had eight against Atlanta and still won. Care to guess what the Cowboys' record is in their last 16 games in which they have been penalized eight or more times in a game?
It's 11-5. Amazing, isn't it?
The presnap penalties conundrum: five yards lost or maintain big play opportunities?
Cowboys coach Wade Phillips said that the penalties that bother him the most are the pre-snap ones. Phillips said it's when you make changes that you can't jump. Phillips also offered that they could go on the first sound every time but that would hurt their audibles that have resulted in big plays.

Coach Phillips seems to have no qualms about putting Felix Jones back at kickoff return.
"The guy's well right now and he's ready to play. We'd like to get him the football and I think that's an opportunity to do that."
Said Jones: "Hey, there ain't no way around that. This is a physical game. You can get hurt walking a straight line. You just play football; there's no way around not getting hurt."
Jones has averaged 25.8 yards on 24 career returns and scored one touchdown last year. He said his knee continues to improve.
"The knee brace really helped out a lot, and you just go from there," he said. "Every day it's getting better until the point where I don't need it anymore. From now on I guess I'll be using it until I feel 100 percent, and confident about what's going on with my knee."
Ogletree huggers: could this be the second week we get to see #85?
The Cowboys also could use rookie receiver Kevin Ogletree. Active in one game this season, Ogletree has four kickoff returns for an average of 23.5 yards, similar to Jones (23.0) and Austin (24.7).
"That’s all you really want to do is help the team win," Ogletree said. "That’s what I’ve been here for. That’s been my motto. When I get in there, I believe it’s going to be trying to make a play or do something to help us."
Again the team's punt returner, Patrick Crayton will take advantage of every opportunity he has with a bit of a chip on his shoulder.
"However they come my way, I've got to maximize them," said Crayton, the NFC special teams player of the week after the longest punt return by a Cowboy since Deion Sanders went 76 yards against Indianapolis a decade ago. "I've got to squeeze 100 percent of the juice out of it."
Crayton was hardly a whiner when assessing his situation last week. He said he would have liked to hear something from the coaching staff, but didn't act like it was hard to figure out.
"I had a dropped pass and a muffed punt," he said. "And the other guy had 250 yards."

Tony Romo has faith in Roy Williams.
"I'm a firm believer that if a guy shows me on a consistent daily basis out here on the practice field that he can do it, he's going to do it in the game," Romo said. "Sure, people are going to have games that aren't whatever they may feel up to their own standards, but that's each individual wanting to be competitive within himself."
"Roy works his butt off at practice. He comes out and he performs out there daily and I don't see any reason why he's not going to have a very successful rest of the season. I'm not going to shy away because he shows me on a consistent daily basis that he does so many good things. It'll happen."

Gerald Sensabaugh says that his thumb is cool, and the defense is ready to ravage the Seahawks' offense.
"Yeah, he (Ware) should be, but we’re all licking our chops a little," Sensabaugh said. "We’re ready to get out there and play again after the game we had Sunday. Our guys are going to be ready to pressure, no matter who’s at tackle or on the O-line. We’re going to get pressure, regardless."
Sensabaugh said that his surgically repaired right thumb, which was heavily wrapped in Sunday’s win over the Falcons, didn’t bother him or change his aggressive approach, and said he sees no reason for that to change.
"It’s pretty good — it’s healing up pretty well, I’ve got a new cast on it today, and I’m ready to go," he said. "I’ll throw it in there. It didn’t hurt me tackling—it didn’t help me catching the ball, but as far as tackling, it didn’t bother me at all."
Junior Siavii is growing into his role as Jay Ratliff's backup at NT. The Cowboys need him to continue to do so.
The Cowboys can preserve Ratliff only if the backup is effective, and Siavii has been. The Cowboys credited Siavii with being in on seven tackles during 16 plays in Sunday's win against Atlanta.
"It would be nice to see him get even more plays," said Ratliff, who agreed that breaks help him stay fresh in the fourth quarter. "He's doing well. We help each other out. We're a team, and we feed off each other."

In high school, Miles Austin did not join the football team until his junior year. Finally, football coach, Steve Mucha, got him aboard.
Mucha, 48, remembers the frustration he felt when Austin repeatedly rejected his pleas to join the team.
"He was concentrating on basketball and track, so we had kind of written him off," Mucha said. "I'd ask him to join and he'd say, ‘It's too late.' I'd say, ‘It's not too late. Let's see what happens."
Just before halftime of his first high school game, Austin caught a 70-yard pass to set up a score.
"Because he's such a great athlete, he caught on quickly to everything we were doing," Mucha said.
As a senior, Austin led the Boilermakers in interceptions and was an all-county receiver.
SAEN's Tom Orsborn also notes:
The record for most receiving yards over three games (in one season) is 612 by the Houston Oilers’ Charley Hennigan in 1961.

Here is the NFL Game Center link for the Seattle Seahawks at Dallas Cowboys.
And here's the series history between the two teams.
Dallas leads the all-time regular season series with Seattle, 7-4, including a 34-9 home rout of the Seahawks on Thanksgiving Day 2008. The Seahawks won the previous regular season meeting, a 13-10 home result in 2005. Seattle last won in Dallas in 2002.
In addition to the regular season series, the teams played a memorable postseason contest, won by Seattle in dramatic, 21-20 fashion at home in the 2006 playoffs.
Cowboys head coach Wade Phillips is 6-1 in his career against the Seahawks, including a 4-0 mark while the Broncos (1993-94) and 1-1 while at the helm of the Bills (1998-2000). Mora was 0-1 against Dallas while at the helm of the Falcons (2004-06), and will be meeting Phillips for the first time as a head man.
50 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think the penalties issue is overrated
Good teams overcome penalties and as Archer points out we’ve been doing that.
Limiting turnovers and creating them defensively is much more important than committing penalties IMO.
In Romo we Trust
Let's hope so, because they're not going anywhere
This personnel group has been committing penalties for 4+ years, it’s not gonna change now.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
Good offenses can overcome penalties
There is no correlation between a high number of penalties and losses in football. This is especially true if you have an offense that can put up yards like the Cowboys. It can be first and 15 every first down and the Cowboys would still make first downs on a regular basis. Of course having a home run threat in Austin also helps.
The penalties that hurt are the ones that come at the worst times. OL penalties that put the team out of field goal range or kill a drive, for instance. The question isn’t quantity but quality of penalties. I’d also argue that penalties on the defense are worse than penalties on the offense. Defensive penalties can make bad offenses look good and good offenses look great.
I didn't know what a mancrush was. Derek Holland showed me.
by DerekSTheRed on Oct 30, 2009 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions
Hadn't seen that before but yeah that echoes my thoughts as well
The only thing I would add, is that this theory is not unique to the Cowboys. I would argue it applies to most football teams at all levels of competition. For instance, I came up with the theory while watching TCU in a bowl game against Iowa State several years ago.
The announcers kept saying how many penalties TCU kept getting. They didn’t mention that all of the penalties were coming on the offensive side of the ball, while the defense (which was and is quite good) played penalty free. Not surprisingly, the Horned Frogs beat the favored Cyclones. Now I didn’t go to TCU, but the guys I was with watching the game did. They kept saying how they always had penalties every year and still managed to win.
That’s when I came up with the theory (if I only had a name) and started applying it to the other football games I watched. So far it seems to be holding.
I didn't know what a mancrush was. Derek Holland showed me.
by DerekSTheRed on Oct 30, 2009 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Right, and I still believe in the counter I wrote at the time
Discipline does not change player DNA. The current group of Cowboys players commit penalties. They are not children. They’re not going to change because of “discipline.”
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
+1
Witten said yesterday penalties is mental disipline on the players, has nothing to do with coaching.
Therefore, if these group of players are predisposed to committing penalties, it doesn’t matter who is their coach, they will always do it.
In Romo we Trust
"There is no correlation between a high number of penalties and losses in football"
Do we have some backup for this?
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
I was hoping that there was some statistical examination
I agree that anecdotally, if wouldn’t seem to hold true, but who knows.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
Here’s an excerpt from the 2007 edition of “Pro Football Prospectus.”
In their 1998 book “The Hidden Game of Football: The Next Edition,” analysts Bob Carroll, Pete Palmer and John Thorn made a remarkable discovery: There is no clear connection between avoiding penalties and winning games. The idea that there’s nothing wrong with penalties is completely counterintuitive. It can’t possibly be true, can it?
No, actually, it can’t possibly be true. At least, it isn’t true in today’s NFL. Perhaps “Hidden Game” was wrong because it was looking only at the 1997 season, or perhaps the NFL has changed over the past decade, but teams with fewer penalties do in fact win more games. Over the past five seasons, the 25 single-season teams with the fewest penalties have averaged nine wins. The 25 single-season teams with the most penalties averaged just 7.1 wins.
On the other hand, not all penalties are created equal. Teams with a lot of offensive penalties lose a lot of games (as St. Louis fans know quite well), but defensive penalties have a negligible effect on wins and losses. Over the past five seasons, the 25 teams with the most offensive penalties averaged six wins, while the 25 teams with the most defensive penalties averaged eight wins — the league average.
I contend that teams with good offenses can overcome a high number of penalties while average to below average teams cannot. Maybe I’m guilty of confirmation bias on defensive penalties. However, it seems to be that defensive penalties can really shift field position, but that may not be as big a deal as I thought.
I didn't know what a mancrush was. Derek Holland showed me.
by DerekSTheRed on Oct 30, 2009 7:43 PM CDT up reply actions
bah posted before I was ready.
I don’t have the fancy statistics that Schatz has. However, if you isolate the penalty to losses correlation to only the teams with 300+ yards/game, I’m betting there would be no correlation.
I didn't know what a mancrush was. Derek Holland showed me.
by DerekSTheRed on Oct 30, 2009 7:47 PM CDT up reply actions
Well, of course
Teams with 300+ yards per game are going to win more in general and have a better chance of overcoming penalties— I don’t think it’s groundbreaking to say that “Teams with good offenses tend to win more games.”
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
I disagree
Even the bad teams are to good to spot them an extra 100 yards throughout the game. And the timing of the penelties can be and often are at very critical or momentum swinging times.
The bye thing worries me
Teams coming off of byes were undefeated until last week, when the Bears lost. Seahawks had an off week to get healthy and game plan. I think we’re a better team, but we’ll see.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
it would be a worry if we were at Seatlle
I think the fact we’ve been at home for three straight weeks and Seattle will be playing this game at 10am their time should off set any bye week advantage for them.
In Romo we Trust
We will see about Mora, Jr. but the game after a bye week has not been fabulous for the Seachickens.
Holmgren’s record after byes was a well-chronicled lament. In his 10 seasons in Seattle, the Seahawks were 2-8 in games after byes.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 30, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions
Every game worries me
but especially the ones Dallas is “supposed to win”. I think the pressure is greater because not only are they expected to win, but because of Seattle’s injury problems, Dallas will be pilloried if they don’t win convincingly.
What I want to see is good exeuction on both sides of the ball.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
Aye, that is the key.
I think what’s had everyone on edge so much relates to that quality of play. Even though we’re 4-2, the team hasn’t been consistently sharp in execution. We’re waiting for them to bring focus, energy, and intensity to every play, or to as high a percentage as possible.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
I think penalties are certainly an indication of the team's level of execution,
whether they cost us the game or not.
I think some penalties, like false starts and offsides, are caused by focused players—they’re focused on getting a jump on their assignments for the upcoming play.
But good execution requires correctly completing your assignment at the correct time. Patience and developing confidence in your ability to handle your assignment without that extra little time edge seem to be culprits.
That said, whenever Ware is called for offsides I’m suspicious. I haven’t seen it this year, but the last couple of years he was called for those (from a standup position) not because he was actually offsides but because he starts his “windup” before the snap but without stepping offsides.
"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin
Off topic...
anyone know how Stanback is doing in New England?
I think the penalties are overated too. But they do make me nuts when I am actually watching the game…..
Anomoly............Finally here.........
I don't think Stanback is even with the Patriots anymore...
But Danny Amendola has like 14 catches for the Rams…
My buddy who's a Pats fan
said he’s seen Stanback in a restaraunt a couple of times, but that’s all he’s seen of him. I don’t think he’s on the field much.
Yup, as a QB.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 30, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Red zone offense question...
…both R. Williams and M. Bennett have reputations as great “leapers”.
So how come we don’t see T.Romo throwing high passes for these guys to go up and get? Is this in the playbook?
"It's how you execute. That's why practice is so important, meetings are so important. ... The will to prepare is just as important as the game itself sometimes." ~Wade Phillips
well...
The throws I have seen where he tries to do that have been thrown too fast and the receivers aren’t reacting to them quick enough to get a good jump on it.
He doesn’t need to just float the ball but he can’t throw a bullet unless the timing is perfect, and it hasn’t been perfect at all.
sounds to me like...
…they don’t practice it enough.
I’m no expert, but the really good teams have receivers who catch the ball then they are well-covered. Those QB’s can intentionally throw it high or throw it low and away for completions.
Who has the greater responsibility here…QB who can throw it right or receiver who can catch it any way?
"It's how you execute. That's why practice is so important, meetings are so important. ... The will to prepare is just as important as the game itself sometimes." ~Wade Phillips
Remember the infamous two fades in a row from the 1 yard line?
Those were to Roy Williams and Marty B, in succession.
Tony and his receivers do not seem to be in synch on fade patterns thus far.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
Ironic how the maligned Brad Johnson threw one
perfectly to Roy in just about their first game.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
They've attempted a few
They just haven’t been connecting.
As far as penalties i couldn’t agree more with the quality of the penalty is what counts. False start on first and ten, not so bad. Offsides on third and four, when we stopped them….bad.
I can see us shutting them ‘Hawks down on both sides of the ball. I can’t name one position they have thats better than what we have.
Can i say that Bennet only had three catches, but two came on that clutch 2 minute drill. Maybe Romo is gaining a little trust going to the kid in prime time situations.
Michael Irvin to Keyshawn Johnson "I know where me and Rice belong on the top ten receivers of all time list, but who do you have in the bottom 8?"
by markdamack on Oct 30, 2009 12:42 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
I think he was looking for Bennett
I’d like Tellus to get the ball a little more because he has much greater yac potential than Witten. If Tony can use them both, the 2 TE sets will be that much more effective.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
I think Bennett will become more and more important for us
the deeper we get into the season. Opposing defenses are going to focus on what we’ve been doing best so far this year, and it will open up opportunities for him. I’m hoping to see him start breaking out like Austin has.
"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin
Yeah, Bennett slowly being brought along.
Remember how many times he was lining up on the wrong side of the line early on? He seems to have got that down, got his blocking down, now they should look to him more often in the passing game just to have another option in the middle.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 31, 2009 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions
My 2 cents.
As a serial false starter at the high school level, I can honestly say that most of my false starts were causally related to the defense jumping off side. If the NFL rule applied at the high school level, I would have been a stud picking up more yards than our fullback.
But penalties have several roots.
1. Lack of concentration. WR’s especially should never false start since their only key, considering crowd noise is the physical snap of the ball. Also when a WR goes in motion, another needs to cover the tackle to avoid and illegal formation. Pay attention to what you are doing and what needs to be done. There is no excuse for not moving up to the line of scrimmage.
2. Lack of technique. This applies mostly to offensive lineman and cornerbacks. In situations where the defensive lineman is quick or simply a superior player, the lineman will take liberties which often lead to obvious holding calls. The player begins to anticipate rather than react which leads to being off balance and getting beat. Flozel with his leg whips are a perfect example of this. With Cornerbacks, they should consider themselves soccer players after the 5 yard line. No hands, no arms, just positioning. Again anticipation leads to poor decisions and penalities to make up for the bad decision.
3. Lack of ability. I like to think of this as the Micheal Irvin rule. He was great, I loved him, but he created separation physically by pushing the CB away either with an elbow or occasionally with both arms fully extended. The latter were always called. It’s not that Micheal wasn’t talented, but he wasn’t talented enough to create separation the old fashioned way, pure speed.
The point is that all of the above are within the power of the player to control. If you play with technique, and focus, you can give your team an incredible advantage. It can be and has been argued that when penaltys happen is bigger than how many, and while that can be true in a vacuum, the total amount of penalties will negate plays mediocre, to good, to great plays. A play for no gain, not that big of a deal; a play for 55 yards, a first down or even a touchdown that is negated, is incredibly dispiriting and can have a long term effect on a game.
Focus to eliminate the penalties and you eliminate the negated plays.
Im worried...
We are getting a little ahead of ourselves here.. This team is very talented, no denying that, but we keep makig stupid mistakes. The penalties are a momentum killer and as fragile as our team phsyche is we cant afford them.
Wade needs to get people focused and stop “Aw Schucks-ing” everything.
That being said, Go Cowboys! Beat the Sea Chickens..
Keep the train rolling..
"Life's battles don't always go to the stronger or faster man. But sooner or later the man who wins, is the man who thinks he can."
Wade is who he is.
He’s the son of Bum, who didn’t offend as many people apparently.
Wade doesn’t see his job as “getting people focused”. That’s their job. Wade’s job is to oversee and delegate through the coaches to the players, except for the defense.
Consider that Keith Brooking, one of our new favorites for his intensity and focus, thinks highly of Wade as a coach and a man.
Big Bill got people’s attention through intimidation. So, I presume, does Mike Singletary. Or Mike Ditka. Or Jimmy.
The tough as nails coach that’ll kick yer ass is but one stereotype.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
Big Bill's Intimidation
also had the team playing very tight and afraid of making a mistake. My son’s highschool baseball coach was the same way. If a player is afraid of making a mistake then he doesn’t play well at all.
The team was also physically beat up at the end of the season,
and there wasn’t a ton of depth past the first team, so the team faded late. I think part of it plays into what you are saying about being so intimidated that they played hurt and were unable to heal.
Its not about the Cowboys' record when they committ 8+ penalties ...
its about what their record would be if they cut those penalties down.
Can Archer answer me what the Cowboys record would have been if they only committed only 2 penalties in those games? Or had Dallas been more focused would they have won more games?
I can highlight one, just one, game, where Dallas’ own lapses in concentration cost them mightily. … Look at the playoff game in year 1 under Wade. Penalties and the lack of concentration killed them. Ginats first drive, 3rd and 5, incomplete pass, but offside PENALTY keeps drive alive. New York scores TD. …. With 11 minutes before the half, the offense runs 10+ minutes off the clock. The COACHES LAPSE and go into “prevent” mode with a minute left before the half. This defensive series before Dallas pressures Manning and Giants are 5 plays and out. But the coaches play prevent with a minute to go. A huge facemask PENALTY boost giants field position and what started as a hope for FG before half for the Giants ends in a Giants score and tie game at half. After a FG and a stop by the D, Romo completes a pass to Jason Witten to mid-field, but wait whats this?? PENALTY nulifies the gain. Two plays later Patrick Crayton DROPS a pass that would have gone for TD and a 10 point Dallas lead. Instead, Dallas punts. … Giants take lead, the Boys driving and Romo completes a pass to Witten to New York 30, but wait, once again, PENALTY on Dallas nullifies the play. Dallas punts. Instead of a FG, the Boys punt. After another D stop, the Cowboys are set up with 1st and 10 at Giants’ 20. So instead of only needing a game winning FG, they need a TD. Next play another PENALTY. A missed blitz pick up next play, and then Patrick Crayton STOPS on his pattern, and the rest is history.
Anyone arguing penalties are overrated .. I dare you to show me how the hell the Giants would have won this game, if not for penalties and stupid mental mistakes.
The Cowboys should have been extremely focused!
At this point, though, getting over the “Wade effect” is not his problem anymore. His very soft coaching has cost the Cowboys already .. but at this point the players need to be accountable to each other. There are a certain few players who need to get on everyone’s asses for playing “soft” and “lacking concentration”. The Jason Wittens, Gerald Sensiboughs, Keith Brookings need to get on the players … even if at some point they call a players-only meeting and a players only practice!!
by spadesking131313 on Oct 30, 2009 8:21 PM CDT reply actions
Yep.
But don’t forget, Tony Romo was solely culpable for the loss since he is the only one who constantly is reminded that he has yet to win in the playoffs.
Funny you should mention that jd
I watched the Cowboys Seahawks playoff game the other night. This was under Parcells, and it wasn’t so much penalties as turnovers and poor play that cost us this game, yet it is Romo who is forever blamed for the loss.
Nearly every big pass Hasselback threw in that game was with Roy Williams responsible for the coverage, including the game winning touchdown with plenty of time left on the clock. One of the Seattle scores was directly due to a pass interference penalty on Newman in the end zone. Romo actually played a terrific game, including driving them down the field for the winning field goal at the end of the game.
We now know that Seattle regularly put slippery balls out there for the opposing team’s field goal tries, and the ball Romo dropped was so shiny it stood out. I mean it was REAL shiny. So in spite of poor plays, and a HUGE penalty, it is Romo who is blamed for the loss.
Roy Williams had some great hits the first three years he was here, and some great interceptions, but his last 3-4 years here he cost this team tremendously with his inability to cover a receiver.
The good news is that he has been replaced by someone who can actually cover, and to expect the same outcome with a much better pass defender would be flawed thinking. It is this fact that leads me to the conclusion that teams can no longer pick on our porous cover-two. If we get the penalties under control, this team can go deep into the playoffs.
Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"
I almost forgot
Terry Glenn’s weak-ass fumble at the goal line was another turnover that gave that game away. It cost us a safety, and we had to punt the ball to Seattle for their game winning drive, and touchdown pass over Williams. On that play Romo got Glenn the ball, and all he had to do was juke one cornerback and he probably would have had a 99 yard touchdown. Instead, he fumbled the ball into the end zone. He was holding the ball away from his body in one hand, and could have easily fumbled it even if the Seattle cornerback hadn’t poked it out. Mistakes and poor play. I think we’ve overcome a lot of what has haunted this team, and we MUST get the penalties under control. If we do this, we could be a load for ANY TEAM in the NFL.
Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"
That's a tough game to watch.
I hate nightmares for a few weeks after that game, and while I like Peyton Manning, there was little joy in my heart when he won the Super Bowl.
Yeah, that was a sloppy game, and it is part of the reason I don’t feel awful about Parcells not deciding to stick around. The team didn’t respond well to him, the defense wasn’t dominating, and it didn’t seem as though he could eliminate the stupid penalities by shear will of personality.

by 
























