Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Jerry: is multitasking more efficient?

For some people the task of presenting the General Manager, Owner and Head Coach of the Dallas Cowboys would be a very simple task, they'll point their finger at just one person.

Jerry Jones.

Has he been VERY wrong in the past? Yeah, he sucked. Was he wrong when he said what he said in the radio? No, he wasn't. And if you want to argue, I'll present to you what wikipedia says (and that's a knowledgeable girl):

Sports teams

In most professional sports, the general manager is a team executive responsible for acquiring the rights to player personnel, negotiating their contracts, and reassigning or dismissing players no longer desired on the team. The general manager may also have responsibility for hiring the head coach of the team.

For many years in U.S. professional sports, coaches often served as general managers for their teams as well, deciding which players would be kept on the team and which ones dismissed, and even negotiating the terms of their contracts in cooperation with the ownership of the team. In fact, many sports teams in the early years of U.S. professional sports were coached by the owner of the team, so in some cases the same individual served as owner, general manager and head coach.

As the amount of money involved in professional sports increased, many prominent players began to hire agents to negotiate contracts on their behalf. The intensified contract negotiations that resulted, as well as the overall increased need for professional business management, drove many sports teams to separate the positions of coach and general manager. Some coaches, however, still insist on being allowed to fill both positions as a condition of employment.

In some sports leagues salary caps have been adopted to maintain a competitive balance and in these leagues it is one of the functions of the general manager to ensure all player contracts are in accordance with these caps, as well as consistent with the desires of the ownership and its ability to pay.

General managers are usually responsible for the selection of players in player drafts and work with the coaching staff and scouts to build a strong team. In sports with developmental or minor leagues, the general manager is usually the team executive with the overall responsibility for "sending down" and "calling up" players to and from these leagues, although the head coach may also have significant input into these decisions.

Player acquisition? Check.

Decisions on personnel? Check.

Monetary decisions? Check.

You want to talk about the past? About the late 90s and early 2000s? Go ahead, knock you inconscious, I won't listen (what's the purpose), I want to talk about right now, which are Jerry's present mistakes?

  • Roy Williams? The current whip boy. Jerry gave up too much for too little. Maybe. This isn't a closed book, at the very least the guy has talent. And because of that, the team needs to continue to play him.
  • Wade Phillips? For many the wrong choice. I tend to simplify things. A my-way-or-the-highway Coach couldn't manage the right kind of production out of a bunch of talented underachievers? Ok, I'll try something different, what about player friendly?
  • Player acquisition? The Draft has a success rate that's up there in competition with the best run franchises... In Free Agency we've seen the likes of Colombo, Davis, Brooking, Kosier, Hamlin, Sensabaugh, etc. They also have a high success rate.
  • Money? They have no money problems and they're making decisions with the future on mind.

Hear me out, in the past 6 years have you seen or heard of a single time when Jerry made a decision that went exactly against the head coach wishes? I'm hearing Terrell Owens? Wrong, Parcells met with Owens not once, but twice (once in Frisco, yes, Parcells traveled out of his way to met with a player, then in Dallas), before he talked contract with Jerry. On playing young guys because the Coaches were forced to? The average fan would have started Henson (yeah, some salt in those fries Henson, take that Tex!) and Romo a lot earlier than Parcells did. Other than them who's an easy call? Miles Austin? You mean the Austin that was guilty of an interception and of dropped passes earlier in the year? The stone hands Austin of previous years?

But yeah, I kind of get it, Jerry Jones is the antichrist and anything that he does is just wrong.

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

3 recs  |  Comment 91 comments  |  Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The point is

I’ve never had a problem with Jerry, the owner. As a GM, he has made some horrible moves – and should bear a good portion of the blame for our playoff drought. But when an owner/GM tries to get into coaching, that is a recipe for disaster. One, it is the model laid down by Al Davis and Dan Snyder. None of the successful teams follow that model. They leave football decisions (like who starts) to the football guys – regardless of the owner’s commitment to the team.

Here is why. When the owner decides who does and does not start, the coaches have no power. That is multiplied when coaches can’t reward or punish players through fines. When a coach loses his power to motivate his players, you get a bunch of underachievers. What is our problem today?

by JimmyJohnson on Oct 31, 2009 12:29 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Please enlight me with names

Names of players that should be playing, shouldn’t be playing or that should or shouldn’t have played in the recent past, and your reasoning.

I’m willing to bet that there’s solid reasoning opposing your side.

I understand your position against Jerry, but I have to try real hard to find mistakes in his recent past… Jerry accepted to change his hand selected heads of personnel to acommodate those hand picked by Parcells? Has he signed players that reflect what the Head Coach and his position coaches need (3-4 players, Fasano, Bennett, Brooking, Sensabaugh)? 3-4 players for the scheme change under Parcells. Fasano and later Bennett for the 2 TE sets. Colombo as a project. Kosier as a little known but gritty player. Brooking as a staple of thoughness under Phillips. Sensabaugh because Phillips likes coverage from his Safeties. Ellis was let go because he couldn’t do anymore what is asked of OLBs, even though Jerry had to pay him signing bonus money.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Oct 31, 2009 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're on the wrong track

It isn’t about talent acquisition. It is about the coach’s ability to get the most from his players. When the owner usurps the coach’s authority, coaches can’t lead. When coaches can’t lead (through the carrot and stick of playing time and/or fines), players don’t perform at peak level. Maybe Roy Williams needs to be benched for a game or two so that he is accountable for his lazy route-running and drops. But Wade can’t do that because Jerry has guaranteed Roy’s starting slot. When your team is the most talented for several years running – with no real results – that says something about your coaches’ ability to motivate players.

by JimmyJohnson on Oct 31, 2009 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're probably guilty of overrating
When your team is the most talented for several years running – with no real results – that says something about your coaches’ ability to motivate players.

Can you really make the case of the Cowboys being more talented that the Steelers, Giants, Colts and Patriots of the recent years?

Oh, I see, they’re just better led, right?

Gimme a break, leadership is one of the most overrated subjects in Football, execution and game planning are my top 2 reasons behind a winning team and that’s two of the things in which the Cowboys have been terribly inconsistent. Is that the fault of the GM?

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Oct 31, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did the Eagles beat us 44-6

because they were better at X’s and O’s? Because they had better talent? Or because the Cowboys quit?

by JimmyJohnson on Oct 31, 2009 1:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ithink some combination of the three

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Oct 31, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did the Cowboys quit because they weren't led?

Or because they didn’t game planned, adjusted and executed AT ALL? I can see how that’s the GM fault, but what is he supposed to do? Release the inconsistent guys? We’re talking about the coaching staff, every receiver, OLineman, the QB, the RBs (because they missed blitz pickups), every DLineman not named Ratliff, and every LB and DB.

Hey, you can throw a bomb at all your infrastructure and try to rebuild again, but that doesn’t mean that you’re going to start building correctly, you can draft busts and miss in FA.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Oct 31, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or...

Keep the players and allow the coach to build a culture of accountability. You can never do that if the owner steps in and designates certain players who cannot lose their starting role or be fined regardless of performance.

by JimmyJohnson on Oct 31, 2009 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chandus

You make good points.No, Jerry is not the antichrist [ IMHO I hope ]. Jerry takes a lot of flack because he is a media hound and has an ego. Neither of these things are totally bad. His media savvy and his money had made the Cowboys one of the most valuable franchises anywhere and his ego demands he do whatever he can to put a good product on the field. He has made mistakes in the past and he will again. I think he is getting better and team is better for it. I too , I have been less than excited with Wade as coach, but somehow he and Jerry have put together a better team than last year and have things seemingly coming together. I look forward to seeing the rest of the season. But know, win or lose , Jerry will start again to improve his team.

by oldboysfan on Oct 31, 2009 12:35 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Can't let the TO thing go

Here’s what Parcells said:
Signing Owens “was not my decision,” Parcells told me after he left Dallas. “I had to do the best I could with him, which is what I tried to do.”

by JimmyJohnson on Oct 31, 2009 12:44 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The facts are...

Dallas has not won a playoff game in 13 years. Most if not all owners in the NFL would have replaced the GM. We are talking about the Cowboys not some 2nd rate team. It is not what the Cowboys were with Tex and Tom. Jimmy made it work as GM and HC because he had control. Jerry is a great owner and a not so good GM imo.

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 12:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

As I said, you can knock yourself inconscious...

… because you can argue until you’re blue in the face about all of Jerry’s mistakes in the mid to late 90s to the early 2000s, I won’t, he screwed it time after time, we agree.

I’m talking right now, his mistakes in the present and recent past.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Oct 31, 2009 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Jerry is doing so good...

lets see him win a SB without Jimmy, The one with Barry was won inspite of Jerry and Barry imo.

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like Troy for one

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Moose as well

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Oct 31, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It could always be worse...

like if little Danny Snyder was the owner. Man that team is a trainwreck.

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

good post Chandus

I think there is a big difference between having a say who or who isn’t getting PT or in the starting lineup and the basic Xs and Os of the game, schemes, etc.

Any GM in the NFL has a say in the former, including Jerry, and the latter is strictly for the coaches and coaches only. Economics of today’s league dictates this.

It’s a shame most fans can’t comprehend this.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 31, 2009 1:16 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Terry,you mean like in NE.

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Belichick's boss

told him to play certain players he’d do it or risk losing his job, it’s that simple. There is a hierarchy in the league, it’s called owner, GM, HC, in that order.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 31, 2009 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bellicheck's boss

wouldn’t be stupid enough to do so. That is the difference between the Patriots and Jerry’s Cowboys.

by JimmyJohnson on Oct 31, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was I was a stupid as Jerry Jones

to be a billionaire with 3 SB trophies in my office and the owner of the greatest sports franchise on the planet.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 31, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LMAO

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not man love, it's facts, pure and simple

Some fans don’t like to hear the truth though.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 31, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that doesn't matter

Jerry is the owner and he’s not firing himself.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 31, 2009 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It does matter when the Dallas Cowboys

haven’t won a playoff game in 13 years. Its sad that we have an owner thats can’t see the forrest for the trees. He loves the spotlight so much that he puts winning aside to be in it.

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No it's your opion.

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it's not an opinion that a GM

can lay down the law to a HC, that’s the hierarchy of the NFL.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 31, 2009 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Depends on who the coach is.

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We are talking about NE right?

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Randy Moss was Belichick's call?

I don’t need to tell you that his acquisition goes against the grain of his tendencies, do I?

And the guy is known for taking plays and routes off, and I don’t see Belichick benching or replacing him.

That’s Bill Parcells version 2.0. Probably in the end, Belichick is going to say that Moss wasn’t his call and how he did everything in his power to make it work…

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Oct 31, 2009 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Belicheck's over there...walkin' on water.

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Nov 1, 2009 8:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The key word is if...

Imo the owner and GM know who the coach is. They stay out of his way and let him coach. Kinda like in the Tex and Tom days. It’s what makes SB champs

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 2:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Jerry isn't that kind of owner

and he was the same way when Jimmy Johnson was winning SBs in the 90s. Nothing has changed.

Anyone who doesn’t think Jerry told Jimmy what to do occasionally back then is delusional.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 31, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you really believe that Jerry was telling Jimmy who to cut and who to keep?

It is a little early in the day to be smoking this much weed, isn’t it Terry?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Oct 31, 2009 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

On occasion, absolutely

He had as much say into the construction of that team as anyone and anyone who thinks otherwsie is the one smoking weed.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Oct 31, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats why Jimmy left...

and we haven’t won too many SBs have we.

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 2:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If you want to get some reaction on a fanpost

just say Jerry is a good GM and it will blowup.hehe

Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.

by DIRE WOLF on Oct 31, 2009 2:34 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That's what I call...

… reading something that isn’t there…

I never said that he’s a good GM, I’m only wondering about his mistakes lately, I’m not saying that he was right and how successful he’s been…

IMO, he made a mistake in taking Phillips, but to say that his hiring didn’t made sense would border on stupid… Jerry had a talented but under performing D, he was also coming from a though as nails coach, hiring a really good defensive minded coach known for being player friendly made sense. He still has a D that tends to perform bellow expectations and a team overall that continues to miss it’s focus.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Oct 31, 2009 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Roy Williams trade
Terrell Owens extension
Zach Thomas
Drafting 3 total current starters (not including kickers) out of the past 4 drafts

by Baked Potato Soup on Oct 31, 2009 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Roy Williams extension (the other one)
Carousel of QBs prior to Romo (Quincy Carter, Hutchinson, Leaf, Henson)
Pacman
Hard Knocks

by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 1, 2009 4:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

my point is

that bitching about Jerry as GM is like bitching about paying taxes, it’s never going to change until he’s dead

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 4:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not necessarily true

Wellington Mara in the mid seventies was similar to Jerry in that he owned the team and acted as GM. The game had clearly passed him by, as the Giants were truly god awful. Fans began to protest by burning their game tickets in the parking lot, hiring planes to carry banners protesting Wellington’s hand in personnel decisions, etc. He eventually saw the light, brought in George Young as GM, hired first Ray Perkins, then Bill Parcells, and the Giants won a few Super Bowls.

And before you call me a hater, yes the situations are different in that Dallas has not been as bad (though that string of 5-11 years was getting there). I am just pointing out that fan protests have made a difference in the past.

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 4:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

that will never happen with Jerry

I don’t care if they burn down his new palace, he’ll never fire himself, just won’t happen.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 4:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no it wouldn't

as his pocket book will always be fat and you know that.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 4:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That doesn't even make sense.

You’re saying that if it affected his pockets, it wouldn’t change, because it wouldn’t affect his pockets. How is that even disagreeing with me?

If this team played poorly and he couldn’t sell out the stadium, he would change the way he is doing things. I believe that because he is clearly an intelligent man, and that would be the intelligent thing to do in that situation.

I don’t agree with you that he is too stubborn and lacks enough business savvy to make necessary changes if the team and its financial structure are hurting for a prolonged period.

by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 1, 2009 4:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no I'm saying it will never affect his pockets

Cowboys are America’s Team and always will be no matter what Jerry does as GM

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 5:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No they won't

They need to be successful to continue in that role.

There was a time when Notre Dame ruled the college football roost. Not so much anymore. Why? They suck, and have done so for awhile

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 5:04 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

and we're 5-2 and in first place

we’re not Oakland or Detroit and never will be.

BTW, ND still has a huge TV contract so they’re not a good example

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 5:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They may have a huge contract, but when is the last time they were national championship contenders

or do you think the financial health of your favorite teams is more important than on field success?

Personally, I don’t give a crap how much money Jerry Jones makes, I just want to see the team that he owns win Super Bowls again.

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 5:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

your changing the subject

the point to all this is that Jerry will never change, he is who he is and he’ll never fire himself.

To think that he might someday is just plain silly.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 6:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

you may be right

but the Cowboys will not always be America’s team if he runs the into the ground

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 6:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Three 5-11 years

Our team continued it’s streak of sell out games, a lot of prime time games and one of the leaders in merchandise sold.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Nov 1, 2009 5:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Keep up that streak of 5-11 years, and the prime time games would dissappear, and themerchandise would nosedive

I agree that it did not happen, but Terry’s blanket statement that it would never happen is nonsense.

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 5:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

not it isn't

we’re the Yankees of the NFL

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 6:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And why are the Yankees the Yankees?

Because they win consistently.

In the eighties when the Yankees were lost, and the Mets looked good, there were a lot more Mets hats seen on the streets of NYC. That has changed now, as the fortunes of the teams has changed. There is now a new generation fo Yankees fans because of their dynasty in the 90s, and they have been successful enough since then to maintain that fanbase.

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 7:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

we're 5-2 and made the playoffs 2 out of the last 3 years

you talk as if we’re headed to another Dark Era like the late 80s and beginning of this decade.

Even then we were still America’s Team and selling a lot of merchandise. Jerry has owned the team for 20 years, if he hasn’t run it into the ground by now, he never will.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 8:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I am not saying that we are heading into a dark era

WHere did I say that?

I said the reason the Cowboys are the most popular team in America is their success, and if that success falls off, they will no longer be as popular.

You are saying that this is a permanent condition, no ifs, and or buts about it. I am saying that this legacy can be tarnished if the success falls off. And success is not going to the playoffs. Success, to the Cowboys, is SUPER BOWLS.

What are you not understanding here?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 9:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

success is going to the playoffs

Cowboys fans aren’t going to stop supporting the team if they aren’t going to the SB each year and the last 15 years has proven that

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 9:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If these team does not periodically win Super Bowls, they will not continue to attract a fan base outside of the Dallas region

If they do not have a national fanbase, they will no longer be America’s team.

I thinkyou said you are living in the Pittsburgh area right? How many COwboys fans are there in Pittsburgh? How many SAn Diego Chargers or Atlanta Falcons fans are thereWhy do you think the Cowboys have more fans? Is it because Jerry has done a bang up job as GM since Jimmy left? Is it because they went to the playoffs a bunch of times in the eighties? Or is maybe, just maybe, and I realize I am way out on a fracking limb here so bear with me, is it because they won a bunch of Super Bowls?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 9:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

there are a lot of Cowboys fans where I live In Pa

more than you think and there always will be a national fan base, fans are going to be fans whether the team wins the SB or not.

I became a fan before they started winning multiple SBs

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 9:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I know there are a ton of Dallas fans in PA

Just like there are all over the country. That is why I asked you about the number of Falcons and Chargers fans in the area. A lot less of them than Cowboys fans, right? Now why do you think that is? Jerry’s sparkling personality? the cool new stadium? Or is it something else?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 9:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

and you are right Cowboys fans will not jump ship if they don't win Super Bowls

I am talking about attracting new fans to replenish the national fanbase. I am fat and old. I am not going to be here much longer. Someone needs to take my place.

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 9:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

One more thing

You do realize that I hope this team renders this debate moot by winning multiple Super Bowls over eh next few years, right ?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 9:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

me too

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 9:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The reason they are America's team is because they have a national fanbase

I am part of that national fanbase, being born and raised in NJ. If the Cowboys are not good for an extended period of time, why would a kid in NJ (or pick a state other than Texas) root for them?

The Raiders are the other team with a national fanbase. How many young kids outside of Oakland have become Raiders fans the past few years?

Do you guys really believe that being “America’s Team” is a permanent state of affairs?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 5:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, because the international fanbase is huuuuuuge.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Nov 1, 2009 5:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

absolutely

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 6:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

damn good point, Chandus

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys

by Aaron Novinger on Nov 1, 2009 8:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually Jerry Saw the Fan Base

And revenue eroding in the early 2000’s. Mickey Spanola had an interview with Jerry in 2003 where he admitted the team’s decline eventually affected ticket and merchandise sales, and he saw bringing in Parcells as a way of restoring the luster of the organization.

It’s pure fantasy to assume most fans would blindly continue to pour money into a poorly-run, incompetent organization. He’s already done it once, after we had three 11-loss seasons in a row. If we were ever to fall down into the gutter for an extended period of time, particularly during a recession, Jerry would be a fool to ignore his shrinking pocketbook.

by kindablue on Nov 1, 2009 10:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no he didn't

Jerry remained as GM during Parcells era, so that just reinforces my argument that he’ll never fire himself.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 2, 2009 7:45 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, well ignoring your horrible ability to predict the future.

If the scenario I presented happened, I 100% guarantee he would make the change.

by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 1, 2009 6:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I guarantee he wouldn't

simply because he would never believe it was his fault. Jerry is a control freak and an egomaniac, what can’t you understand about?

That combination would never fire himself.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 8:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

IS that good thing?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 9:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I am sking your opinion

Do you think that is a good thing?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 9:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I really don't know what you mean by that question

good for what? Do I think it’s good for the team? Well, I think Jerry has done a good job running the Cowboys for the past 20 years, so like I said, it doesn’t matter, it’s the man’s personality, it is what it is.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 9:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No that is not what I am asking

you wrote: I guarantee he wouldn’t simply because he would never believe it was his fault. Jerry is a control freak and an egomaniac,

Do you think that it is a good thing that Jerry’s egomania means he will never find fault with his perfomance?

Again, saying “that is the way it is” does not answer the question

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 10:04 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

again, it doesn't matter because it won't change anything

thats my answer and I’m sticking with it

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 2, 2009 7:46 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

BPS Jerry will never fire himself no matter what

To think otherwise is simply wishful thinking on your part, it’s not being realistic

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 5:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Where did I say that I wished that he would?

I’m just someone that runs a business, and I know that if your business model stops working, you have to make changes. To say that his won’t stop working is actually just backing out of the discussion.

When you make an absolute statement like that about him, you are basically saying that he is more stubborn than he is intelligent, and that he would rather run the franchise into the ground and stop making money than make changes.

by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 1, 2009 6:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

yes, yes, yes, YES!

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Nov 1, 2009 7:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no, read above

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Nov 1, 2009 8:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Mom_s_camera_081_small
A Special 'Thank You' to Grizz.
Small
Garrett DOES Have a Running Problem
Images_small
Playoff Chances: Week 10
Captain_small
NFL Power Rankings - Week 11 - Final Edition
Captain_small
Seven Statistical Nuggets To Take The Edge Off

Recent FanPosts

Villaronga_small
Theismann, head, hole in the ground ...
Small
Cowboys and Redskins at Dallas - A Look Back
Fox-jimmyjohnson_20_3
Are the Redskins the key to the division..?
Avatar_small
Mike Jenkins Bicep Treatment
Small
Anyone scared Watkins must play again...?
Small
It Isn't JUST About December
Small
More Witten please!!!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Arrowhead Pride
Chiefs Have Three Tight Ends Active; Vrabel is Inactive
Buc 'Em
BUC'EM Predictions!
Stampede Blue
Week Eleven Early Morning Coffee

SPONSORS


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher