Offensive Confusion
Everybody has an opinion on what's wrong with the Cowboys offense. It's Romo. It's Garrett. It's the WRs, or lack thereof. It's the pass protection. It's all of the above. Well, sitting here on my couch 2000 miles from Dallas, it's obvious that I don't have the answer either. But since everyone else is doing it, here's my two cents, which I hope is a bit more sophisticated (and accurate) than a "Romo sucks!" chant.
1) The offense is more complicated than the players can handle right now.
Evidence: The delay-of-game penalty in Denver, and the repeated close calls with the playclock. QB reminding guys of where to line up in formations. Poor blitz recognition and pickups. Repeated miscommunications between QBs and receivers.
The Problem: Specifically, Romo has too much going on in his head pre-snap, and he's not doing a good enough job of handling all the reading, reminding, and decision-making. In addition to all of that, he's trying to change his leadership style between snaps and on the sidelines. Blame it on Garrett's scheme and calls, Gurode's poor protection calls, mistakes at WR, or Romo's intelligence, practice habits, or dating life. One way or the other, somebody has to give Romo some breathing room to concentrate on playing his position because the "field general" thing is leading to too many mistakes.
Suggested Solutions:
-Simplify the offense. I'm not suggesting going back to the Quincy "half of the field" Carter offense, just not worrying so much about getting the perfect matchups. -Quit calling two plays in the huddle. How many times has Romo gone to the line, scanned the D and killed the first option, only to have the D shift. And part of the run-pass ratio problem is that Romo audibles out of a lot of running plays (which is why we rarely run on first down, I think). I don't know for sure that Dallas is actually calling two plays most of the time, or whether this is common practice throughout the league, and again, I'm making a diagnosis with no knowledge of what's actually going on in the huddle or on audibles. But whether Romo is calling his own plays at the line or just switching to Plan B, it's not working. Audibles can be great at times, but Romo isn't Peyton, and sometimes you've got to just line up and beat the other guys even if they have the right play called against yours.
-Give somebody else the job of calling protection assignments. I can't comment on Gurode's intelligence, but I'm pretty sure that most teams have the center calling the protection schemes and the QB isn't overly involved. If the QB is thinking about getting his protection lined up, he's not thinking about where he's going to throw it. I don't know enough to make an intelligent suggestion of who should be doing this, but it doesn't appear that Gurode's up to the task.
- Throw in a little no-huddle or half-hurried offense from time to time, or at least some rollouts. Not all the time, but just occasionally so that you get Romo to rely on his instincts instead of his head. Most of his turnovers these days are mental breakdowns, not from forcing things like his first few years. Maybe "bad Romo" isn't gone for good, but in chasing him off Garrett has also chased off "good Romo" in the process.
- Patience. Maybe it's just a matter of getting used to the new wrinkles, making some adjustments to what the defense are throwing at them, and getting out of their own way. Maybe time and experience will lead to some growth that will pay off in December and January.
2) Garrett is smarter than he needs to be.
Evidence: Back-to-back endzone fade passes against Carolina. Back-to-back endzone slants to Hurd vs Denver. Overall tendency to go against conventional wisdom--i.e. passing on first downs, second downs, and third downs.
The problem: Garrett's either an idiot, too stupid to realize that you don't succeed by doing the above mentioned things, or he's trying to be smarter than everyone else in the room, thinking that those things will work just because the defense expects him to NOT do them. Now we know that Garrett's not an idiot--he went to Princeton and played QB in the NFL for a long time, and idiots don't do that. So quite simply, Garrett's too smart for his own good sometimes. He plays that annoying "I know that you know that I know what you think I'm thinking" game too often, guessing what the other guys aren't expecting and then trying that. And on top of that, he tries to get the perfect matchup, formation, and play call every time, leading to the above over-complication of the offense.
Suggested Solution: Garrett needs a Sparano to keep him grounded, someone in his ear to check him when he's overthinking things, someone to remind him to run in the second half. I don't know that that guy is on the Cowboys staff right now, but this is what happens when you pay the offensive coordinator a ton of money and tell the Head Coach to keep his nose out of the offense.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
6 recs |
33 comments
Comments
Interesting perspective
The Bye week is the Cowboys’ chance to make any changes like the ones you suggest.
It will be interesting to see what JJ (the GM) does with his coaches and strategic changes in approach to the season.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on Oct 6, 2009 6:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I'm sure JJ will show some great strategy
How about “Everytime the cowboys win, Wade gets unlimited access to the nacho cheese dispenser for a week”.
It’s a joke so settle down all you suddenly-appointed blog police who get to tell everyone who is a real fan and who isn’t.
by Billito on Oct 6, 2009 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey! You're not a real fan!!!
Oops…I just read the last part of your post now.
Never mind.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on Oct 11, 2009 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice!
Throw in a little no-huddle or half-hurried offense from time to time, or at least some rollouts.
Umm, where have these been? These are things Romo has had success in—not pocket passing. He likes to step up and around or behind the tackles and hashmarks. I often see teams run the no-huddle for a series or two just to get the QB in a rhythm. That helps carry his accuracy and timing over throughout the rest of the game.
The chicken or the egg? I can’t decide. Either way, a little nesting could go a long way.
Jai guru deva, ommm
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 6, 2009 8:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
unfortunately
a no huddle where the qb throw incompletions just makes the offense looked like a rush mess. But I agree with you lol – im willing to try anything to get romo into the game, though im not sure the playcalling is the problem with him.
by foyesboys on Oct 7, 2009 1:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dallas runs a decent amount of hurry up
They did it against Denver too. It’s a half huddle hurry up to not really take the defense by surprise but not give them enough time to make adjustments. The problem is when you do this and your offense isn’t clicking, it tends to lead to miscommunications, 1 yard runs, incompletions, and lots of three and outs (see the second half against Denver). When you have the lead, you shouldn’t be playing games in the second half, especially with this o-line. get in the huddle, run off the play clock, and let the line do their job. The Cowboys had no time of possession in the second half, and it became clear that if the offense didn’t get it going that it was only a matter of time before Denver began scoring, they simply had too many good opportunities.
I agree about rolling out though. It was funny because someone on here asked where Romo’s mobility had been and in the Carolina game he actually did some good scrambling. The 4th down play that Romo got it to Hurd tells the story. Let’s be honest, the line isn’t a great pass blocking line, and Romo’s really not a great pocket passer, and while we’re at it, the receivers are pro-bowlers. That’s why Hurd got open, because Romo bought time which makes it so much more difficult to cover.
Like the original post said, Garrett is trying to do all these complicated things, but when Romo is getting rushed he doesn’t have time to analyze everything or for the play to develop. So I agree, you either have to simplify the offense, (screw this “romo-friendly” crap), or you design more roll-outs and scrambles.
It's not cocky if it's a lie.
by FelixFanclub on Oct 7, 2009 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
receivers aren't pro-bowlers*****
It's not cocky if it's a lie.
by FelixFanclub on Oct 7, 2009 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice Post!
Make some kind of adjustments, cause this offense ain’t clicking! Whatever it takes to get this offense rolling.
A healthy Felix Jones would do a world of good though.
by Boyz4Life on Oct 6, 2009 9:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
As I was driving home today I was thinking about Romo’s drives in the pre-season. Granted, the offense and defense being played is very “vanilla”, I vaguely remember most of Romo’s completions coming off play-action and designed rollouts. Where has this gone?
by jsams on Oct 6, 2009 10:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Sir Romo sees a lot better when he's not looking over these
muscle piles battling in front of him. I think he does better when he’s in motion and can see what’s around him.He’s a lot more accurate when his feet are in motion, the guy’s just not a pure pocket passer. That’s why he makes great plays when the protection breaks down and has to scoot. If I were Garrett, I’d roll this guy out about 50% of the time if I could.
by Benthere on Oct 6, 2009 10:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think that's why Garrett hurts Romo.
Garrett does not know how to handle an athletic quarterback whose best plays are made with his feet. It’s like trying to turn Vick into a pocket passer. Now obviously Romo is a much better passer and Vick’s a much better runner, but it’s along the same principle. I haven’t done this but if you type in Romo highlights in youtube my guess is you wont see many 5 step drops where he hits a 12 yard pass. You are going to see the Rams game when the snap went way over his head, he kicked it, picked it up, juked the defender and ran for about 10 yards. That’s who Romo is, why not just accept it and play to his strength?
It's not cocky if it's a lie.
by FelixFanclub on Oct 7, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
update:
I clicked a tony romo highlights video in youtube and it took a whole minute and and ten seconds before it got to the play against the rams……
It's not cocky if it's a lie.
by FelixFanclub on Oct 7, 2009 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kosier strikes me as the sharpest of the 5
But until we realised what we were missing everyone was saying we needed an upgrade!
I would think he is safe for another year or 2, he is playing well this year.
"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson
by BoyfromOz on Oct 6, 2009 11:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I could be wrong, but I think that last year
Kosier was calling the blocking schemes instead of Gurode.
Then when Kosier was hurt and Proctor went in…….the whole thing fell apart.
By the way, very nice post, I enjoyed it and agree on the great majority of what you’re saying.
by BishopWest on Oct 6, 2009 11:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It seems like
the offense is just too many long routes and not enough short to intermediate routes. With the exception of Witten, it seems like there is nothing in the middle of the field. Every route is outside of the hash marks and very long. In the Denver game, Dallas also went away from what worked with them in the Carolina game. Run the offense through Jason Witten. Make sure that Witten is always there so Tony can check down if necessary, which he usually has to do. I think that Garrett is just trying too hard to get vertical with non-speed-burning guys. Austin is our only WR that can really run by CB’s and he isn’t on the field every play. I’d like to see the offense simplified and have the routes shortened up and bring them inside the hashes.
by Felix J on Oct 7, 2009 1:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Too many long passes?
In the DEN game, Garrett’s first 53 plays (until 10 min remaining in the 4th Quarter) were either runs or short passes.
by BishopWest on Oct 7, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
x
Garrett needs a Sparano to keep him grounded, someone in his ear to check him when he’s overthinking things, someone to remind him to run in the second half.
A very good point. I think too many people forget that Tony Sporano was also an instrumental part of that 07 offense and very few people gave him credit.
After Fuentes blows a save and an Angels loss to the Indians:
"Angels still in first place" - UCI Halo
"Hey you know who would have gotten those 3 outs in the 9th?
Darren O’Day." - FirebatM3
LOL
by hinduplaya on Oct 7, 2009 5:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
SOLUTION
Actually spend the preseason getting guys in shape, disciplined, and intimate with the playbook instead of using the first half of the season as a “learn as you go” program.
by emoon3 on Oct 7, 2009 8:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Last year
You would have had a valid point with the Hard Knocks scene in town. But this year, I didn’t hear anything but praise for the pace, discipline, and content of training camp from Raf and the other guys who were there.
The “too undisciplined” chant is getting old, especially because even Mr. Discipline himself had the same problems with most of these players.
by greatwhitenorth on Oct 8, 2009 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too many players
probably feel they are “untouchable”. If they had fear for they’re job, trust me, whatever discipline problem the players have would go away instantly! It’s coaching, trust me.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 10, 2009 11:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
Even under Mr. Discipline himself we still had the same problem
This lets you KNOW that the problem is NOT the coaching – it is the PLAYERS, trust me :)
by BishopWest on Oct 11, 2009 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like this solution!!!
The problem is, whether I like this solution or not matters little. Getting the coaches to realize this-priceless!
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 10, 2009 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They look sloppy before the snap
It seems like Dallas often gets tight on the snap count when they should not be rushed. How many times do we see Romo begging AG to snap the ball at the last second.
Also, it doesn’t inpsire confidence when it seems that they have a game that every player has to do some pointint pre snap. “Tony, I see a linebacker” “There is a safety over there, right in front of us”. It looks like nobody really knows what is going on. It also seems like too often Romo is having to grab a back or receiver and send them the other direction out of the huddle.
Just pure slop.
by I_miss_Switzer on Oct 7, 2009 8:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
But why all the confusion and slop pre-snap? Who/what is the cause of this team not being able to do what 75% of the rest of the NFL makes look easy?
by greatwhitenorth on Oct 8, 2009 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good post
I like your thinking. If you notice Brady or Peyton they come to the line, point out the MIC backer, and proceed to make their pre-snap reads. Romo has to direct traffic, point out the blitzer/s, and then make his pre-snap read-IT IS TOO MUCH. People need to know their assignments and blitz protections, Romo is basically setting up the offense out there.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
by Wmillion on Oct 8, 2009 11:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It seems like too many guys are pointing out to much
it just looks like mayhem. Romo doesn’t need 4 guys to point out defenders to him before every play.
by I_miss_Switzer on Oct 8, 2009 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
Also, if Romo is having to take time to direct backs and WRs where to line up, that is less time for him to make his reads—such as spotting that lurker of a safety/center-fielder.
There's somethin' happenin' here...what it is ain't exactly clear...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Oct 9, 2009 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We're gonna have to see
If that is going to continue. That has to stop, for the QB’s sake. He needs to have his head in the play. The coaches have to adress this. Or else if you thought I was blaming coaching before, wait till you hear what I have to say about the coaching if it continues.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 10, 2009 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't Forget Gurode
Romo has to use 20 percent of his available RAM and computing power to focus on where, how, and when Gurode might snap the ball.
by Iowacowboy on Oct 11, 2009 8:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Valid point! JG trying to be smarter than necessary!
Looking at the 2 plays which resulted in TOs in Denver –
1st one was 3&14 at 20 yeard line, we are leading by 10 , why the heck try to pick 14 yards with empty backfield??? Romo got blindsided and the turnover cost 7 points. ( #%%^#^ A.Spencer)
2nd one was in the Denver redzone after fumble recovery , 3rd & 11 , should have gone for a quick throw and took the field goal. Instead trying to pick the 11 yards another lon developing pass play which Romo got out but whether his trow was off or Miles and he were on different pages and Champ got a uncontested interception. 3 points probably wouldn’t have nailed the game but at least increased the lead and would have given momentum.
Looks like JG either underestimated Denver D or got outsmarted !
by Nan_L on Oct 10, 2009 7:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
On the 3&14, there were 2 guys open on that play and Romo didn't see either one of them
Choice was open and the nearest defender was 10 yards away. Bennett was open in the spot that Hill (DEN) had just vacated. Romo’s eyes were glued on one receiver to his right, thus the sack-fumble.
During week 4, out of 109 situations where teams were in 3rd and 10 or longer, 83.% of the time they threw the ball instead of running it. Of the 18 times they ran, they got zero first downs.
Passing was probably the right call (though an empty backfield may not be the right call.) However, I don’t think JG underestimated the Denver D or got outsmarted, I think his players let him down by not executing the plays correctly.
by BishopWest on Oct 10, 2009 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















